Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 Sep 16:2025.09.16.676631. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.09.16.676631

Exploring metalloproteome remodeling in calprotectin-stressed Acinetobacter baumannii using chemoproteomics

Maximillian K Osterberg 1,, Daniel W Bak 2,, Claudia Andreini 3, Jeanette M Critchlow 4, Jonathan C Trinidad 5, Peter V Cornish 6, Tae Akizuki 7, Walter J Chazin 8, Eric P Skaar 9, Eranthie Weerapana 10,*, David P Giedroc 11,*
PMCID: PMC12458113  PMID: 41000871

Abstract

The growth of bacterial pathogens is limited by nutritional immunity, where the infected host deploys metal scavenging proteins to starve the pathogen of essential transition metals. An important transition metal-sequestering protein is the S100A8-S100A9 heterotetramer, calprotectin (CP). Prior work reveals that CP induces a significant Zn- and Fe-starvation response in the Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen, Acinetobacter baumannii, in liquid culture. Here, we employ a quantitative chemoproteomics platform to pinpoint changes in abundance-corrected cysteine reactivity, and by extension cellular metal occupancy in metalloenzymes, that occur when A. baumannii is challenged with physiological CP in liquid culture relative to an untreated WT control. Changes in protein abundance with CP stress reveal a pronounced Zn-limitation and Fe-starvation response and reciprocal regulation of three enzymes of central carbon metabolism, including aconitase. A majority of the 2645 quantifiable Cys-containing peptides that show an increase in abundance-corrected Cys reactivity (150) are derived from known Zn-, Fe- and Fe-S-cluster proteins, revealing a significant decrease in metal occupancy (undermetalation) across the proteome. Myriad cell processes are compromised by undermetalation of the metalloproteome, including enzymes that function in the TCA cycle and respiration, GTP metabolism, ribosome remodeling, tRNA charging, and proteostasis. A direct comparison of a strain lacking the candidate metallochaperone ZigA (ΔzigA) with the wild-type strain reveals that the loss of ZigA is effectively silent in this assay. We conclude that CP induces a widespread, negative impact on the metalation status of the metalloproteome that results in a significant nutrient limitation response.

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of widespread antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to conventional and last-resort antibiotic therapies continues to complicate efforts to combat bacterial infectious disease in humans.1–2 One attractive approach to meet this challenge is to identify metabolic pathways in bacterial pathogens that become critical only during the course of an infection, in an adaptive often bacteriostatic response to host efforts to minimize dissemination from the initial site of colonization. This might ultimately lead to optimal deployment of myriad antimicrobial weapons by the host that are used to clear the invading pathogen. Targeting specific aspects of bacterial metallostasis,3 a term encompassing all processes that maintain the integrity of the metalloproteome upon challenge by metal limitation or metal toxicity,4–6 might be one such strategy to aid development of new antibacterial therapeutic strategies.3,7

An important antimicrobial response of the innate immune system toward extracellular pathogens is the deployment of transition metal-sequestering proteins that limit the availability of transition metals to the bacterium at sites of infection. This induces a metal starvation response in a process known as nutritional immunity.4,8–9 Originally discussed in the context of host nutrient Fe(III)-limitation mediated by lactoferrin, which binds Fe(III), and lipocalin-2, which binds Fe(III)-siderophore complexes, nutritional immunity against invading pathogens is now known to extend to other first-row d-block metals including Mn(II) and Zn(II) as well as Fe(II).10–14 The S100 sub-family of EF-hand Ca(II)-binding proteins have distinct transition-metal binding sites that provide them with defined roles in host nutritional immunity. The S100A8/S100A9 heterotetramer, calprotectin (CP),15–16 is a unique member of this sub-family, well characterized for its participation in the “tug-of-war” between pathogen and host for nutrient metals.17 CP harbors two pairs of high-affinity transition-metal coordination sites: One is a His3-Asp site that is common to other S100 proteins,15,18–19 while the other is an octahedral hexahistidine (His6) site found only in CP, which chelates Zn(II),20 Cu(II),21 Mn(II),22 Ni(II)23 and Fe(II).24 While the transition metal-sequestering role of CP is paramount to its function, evidence has emerged to suggest that CP induces a cell wall stress response that is independent of its role in metal sequestration.25–26 These findings largely derive from bacterial growth experiments in liquid culture in the presence of wild-type and mutant CP derivatives.

It is well-established that bacteria cultured in the presence of CP are starved for transition metals in a way that appears strongly dependent on the culture conditions and the organism itself.15 We have been interested in how the Gram-negative opportunistic and nosocomial pathogen, Acinetobacter baumannii, responds to CP-mediated stress.27 Early bacterial cell culture and metal add-back experiments revealed that CP induces Zn(II)-starvation in A. baumannii given the strong transcriptional up-regulation of the Zur (zinc-uptake repressor) regulon.28–29 Subsequent global transcriptomics and proteomics experiments revealed that CP drives a chronic Fe-starvation response superimposed on the Zn-limitation response.27,30 These studies also established that one of the metabolic responses to low Fe availability is the prioritization of flavin biosynthesis, and evidence was presented for a “work-around” strategy allowing cells to accumulate high levels of flavin required for electron transfer that might be compromised as a result of a decrease in Fe-containing ferredoxins.30 In addition, these studies hinted at a failure or prioritization of queuosine-tRNA biosynthesis, given the increased cellular abundance of the 6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin (6-CPH4) synthase (QueD2) which catalyzes the rate-determining step in this pathway; it was subsequently shown that CP treatment reduces flux through the queuosine-tRNA biosynthesis pathway.31 Queuosine is a hypermodified 7-deazaguanosine derivative32–33 found in the anticodon loop of four transfer RNAs (tRNA) and is upregulated under nutrient-limitation and metal-limitation stress responses in other bacteria and organisms.34–35 The Q substitution is known to impact tRNA structure and function in a way that can affect the rate and/or fidelity of translation and ultimately the composition of the proteome.36

The set-point model for transition metal homeostasis predicts that CP impacts bacterial metabolism by impairing the ability of the cellular milieu to supply metalloproteins with their cognate metal or metal cofactor.37–38 This model predicts widespread undermetalation of some or all the metalloproteome,3,37 as has been demonstrated for selected metalloenzymes in a small number of organisms.23,39–40 The extent to which the metalloproteome is globally impacted in this way is currently unknown. Here, we employ a quantitative chemoproteomics platform to elucidate changes in abundance-corrected cysteine (Cys) reactivity that results when A. baumannii is exposed to physiological CP in liquid culture relative to an untreated control. Metal-liganding cysteines in a metalloprotein become more reactive toward an electrophile upon metal dissociation, since metal-coordination attenuates the nucleophilicity of that cysteine.41–44 Thiolate ligands are ubiquitous components of Fe-S cluster-containing proteins and a subset of Zn-metalloprotein sites, and as a result changes in the reactivity of these cysteines can act as a proxy for cellular metallocofactor occupancy.45 Strong support for this hypothesis derives from pioneering studies of Fe-S protein biogenesis in Escherichia coli,46–48 and examination of the effects of the thiophilic metal-chelating prodrug holomycin in E. coli.49

We reasoned that this chemoproteomic workflow could be used to globally probe metallocofactor occupancy in CP-treated A. baumannii, leveraging the finding that CP induces a Zn- and Fe-limitation regulatory response in this organism.30–31 Using an isobaric mass spectrometry-based tagging strategy to quantify protein abundance, we show that pairs of enzymes involved in central carbon metabolism show reciprocal changes in protein abundance. These include two pairs of TCA cycle enzymes, aconitase50 and fumarase,49 a Zn- vs. Fe-type alcohol dehydrogenase, and the ribosomal proteins L31 and the low-zinc paralog L31B,51–52 these findings consistent with a classical metal-sparing response.53–54 In total, 29 Zn and Fe-S cluster proteins were found to exhibit a statistically significant ≥2-fold increase in the reactivity of metal-coordinating cysteines, including 22 Zn-metalloenzymes and 7 Fe-S cluster proteins. Undermetalation of Fe-S proteins negatively impacts their cell abundance, potentially consistent with increased turnover and more globale Fe sparing, in contrast to the vast majority of undermetalated zinc enzymes, which display minimal changes in abundance. These undermetalated enzymes function in energy metabolism and respiration, GTP metabolism, ribosome remodeling and tRNA charging, RNA metabolism and proteostasis. In addition, ribosomes from CP-stressed cells exhibit classical hallmarks of ribosome hibernation and nutrient limitation.55 These findings are broadly recapitulated in a strain lacking the candidate Zur-regulated metallochaperone, ZigA,27,56–57 leaving unknown any potential metalloenzyme client for this GTPase.

RESULTS

Experimental Strategy.

In this work, we employed a 6-plex amine-reactive tandem mass-tag (TMT)-labeling approach coupled with desthiobiotin iodoacetamide (DBIA) Cys-labeling and streptavidin-agarose biotin enrichment for sequential quantification of protein abundance and abundance-corrected cysteine-reactivity changes in CP-stressed vs. unstressed A. baumannii ATCC 17978-VU cells (Figure 1). Biological duplicate bacterial cell lysates containing both soluble and membrane-associated proteins were obtained for untreated wild-type (WT), CP (300 μg/mL)-stressed WT and CP-stressed ΔzigA cells (six samples total) and subjected to DBIA labeling and protein isolation, digested with trypsin and subjected to 6-plex TMT labeling using the scheme indicated (Figure 1). The six samples were combined together and one part of the combined sample (≈25% of the total; in technical duplicate) was subjected directly to isobaric mass-spectrometry analysis to quantify relative protein abundance across each TMT channel. This experimental workflow thus provides a quantitative read-out of the relative changes in protein abundance in three pair-wise comparisons (measured across four replicate channels per biological condition): 1) WT vs. WT+CP; 2) WT vs. ΔzigA +CP, and 3) WT + CP vs. ΔzigA + CP in an approach analogous to label-free proteomics experiments published earlier.30 This concentration of CP is sufficient to significantly sequester Zn, Fe(II), and Mn from the media (Figure S1A), yet induces only a significant ≈2-fold decrease in total cell-associated Zn as measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), with little corresponding change in total cell-associated Fe despite these cells being significantly Fe-starved30 (Figure S1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the workflow employed in this study. Briefly, biological replicates of each of three bacterial cultures were subjected to cell lysis and thiol labeling, protein isolation and digestion, and derivatization with one of six TMT reagents, as indicated. Samples were mixed at 1:1:1:1:1:1 and this combined sample subjected to either protein abundance quantitation or streptavidin enrichment and cysteine reactivity quantitation by LC-MS/MS. The insets show ribbon representations of Zn(II) bound active site of β-carbonic anhydrase, MtcA2 (upper) and apo (metal-free) MtcA2 (lower) that might be present in an CP-treated sample (designated undermetallated). See text for additional details.

The remainder of the combined sample (75% of the total; in technical triplicate) was subjected to streptavidin enrichment and elution, with the relative abundance of individual eluted peptides again quantified by reporter-ion intensity. This provides relative quantitation of the abundance of Cys-containing peptides across the same three pair-wise comparisons (measured across six replicate channels per biological condition). Normalizing these cysteine-reactivity changes against the changes in protein abundance, a net change in Cys reactivity is obtained as proxy for the relative change in fractional metal occupancy for a given metalloprotein.44,47,49 Only those changes in net Cys reactivity greater than 2-fold (log2=±1) with a χ2 cut-off of 9.0 were generally considered of primary significance here, although in selected instances we discuss changes with slightly lower values (log2=±0.64; χ2≥9.0).

We used MetalPredator,58 the metalPDB database59 and related tools with manual curation to estimate the number of Zn metalloproteins and Fe-S cluster proteins in the A. baumannii ATCC 17978-VU proteome to provide context for the findings reported here. We predict the presence of 225 zinc metalloproteins (comparable to 215 predicted previously30), of which 40% (87) contain at least one cysteine in the first coordination shell (Document S1). Of these 87 Zn proteins, 6 contain a single Cys, 11 contain two Cys, 22 contain three Cys, and 50 are tetrathiolate coordination sites that are known or anticipated to bind Zn, but if not previously characterized, could also potentially coordinate a 4Fe-4S cluster.60 Likewise, we estimate the presence of 92 Fe-S-cluster proteins in A. baumanni ATCC 17978-VU (Document S1). We note that A. baumannii, like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, contains the minimal complement of ISC enzymes required to assemble both [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] proteins,61 including the cysteine desulfurase IscS, the scaffolding protein IscU, the Fe-S cluster carriers IscA, ErpA, and NfuA,62 as well as two copies of the regulatory protein IscR.63 There is no “stress-responsive” SUF Fe-S cluster biogenesis system in A. baumannii like that found in E. coli.48 In all, we were able to detect 147 (65%) known or predicted Zn enzymes and 59 (64%) known or predicted Fe-S cluster proteins in the proteome (Figure 2A). These percentages represent excellent coverage, since they are slightly higher than the fraction of the total A. baumannii proteome detected in these experiments (1966 proteins or 52%); we note however that there may be unidentified Zn and Fe-S cluster proteins that were not predicted by this analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Change in protein abundance with CP treatment. (A) Pie charts that summarize the statistics of proteome and metalloproteome coverage in these experiments in A. baumannii lysates. (B) Volcano plot of WT cells treated with CP vs. untreated WT cells. (C) Volcano plot of ΔzigA cells treated with CP vs untreated WT cells. (D) log-log plot of CP-mediated changes in the proteomes of WT vs. ΔzigA cells. Solid lines, boundaries of a net fold change of 2 (log2 fold change = 1) deviating from the trendline (dashed line) with the ZigA data point indicated in red. In panel A, 141 proteins increase in cellular abundance ≥ 2-fold (red box) while 45 decrease in abundance ≥ 2-fold (blue box).

Changes in Protein Abundance in CP-stressed A. baumannii.

A volcano plot illustrating the impact of CP stress on the WT A. baumanni proteome shows major perturbations of the proteome. Of the 1966 total proteins detected, 141 proteins increased and 45 proteins decreased in abundance (Figure 2B, Document S2). The changes observed with the WT strain upon CP stress are virtually identical with those obtained in a pairwise comparison of the CP-stressed ΔzigA strain vs. untreated WT cells (Figure 2C–D). This reveals that the cellular impact of CP is not appreciably impacted by the absence of ZigA, which as a Zur target, reaches high intracellular levels (≈400 molecules per cell) under CP-stress (Figure S2; Table 1).27,30 Furthermore, ZigA expression is confirmed to be strongly repressed in unstressed cultures as indicated by a nearly unchanged protein abundance in the ΔzigA+CP/WT dataset (Document S2).

Table 1.

List of selected proteins involved in Fe/Zn homeostasis or the stress response that show increased cell abundance in CP-stressed wild-type (WT+CP) or ΔzigA (ΔzigA + CP) vs. WT untreated control cells.a

Uniprot Entry KEGG Entry Description Gene Name Protein Ratio (log2) WT+CP v WT Protein Ratio (log2) ΔzigA+CP v WT Fur/Zur b Biological Function
A0A1E3MAV2 A1S_2579 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybenzoate dehydrogenase fbsD 2.66 2.20 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3MAY3 A1S_2570 Acetyltransferase fbsK 2.52 2.03 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1L5TK40 A1S_2580 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybenzoate synthetase fbsC 2.31 2.01 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M124 A1S_0771 Small-conductance mechanosensitive channel 2.31 2.07 Ion transport
V5VCJ3 A1S_1986 Fumarate hydratase class II fumC 2.24 2.22 TCA cycle
A0A1E3M675 A1S_2390 Acinetobactin biosynthesis protein basB 2.23 2.27 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A059ZM74 A1S_0391 Large ribosomal subunit protein bL31B rpmE2 2.06 2.30 Zur L31 Zn-sparing paralog
A0A1E3MDH8 A1S_2571 Ornithine decarboxylase fbsJ 2.04 1.79 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3MAZ6 A1S_2572 Alcaligin biosynthesis protein fbsI 2.03 1.63 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A5P1UDU4 A1S_2581 isochorismate synthase fbsB 2.03 1.71 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
V5VE02 A1S_1950 Universal stress protein 2.02 1.92 Stress factor
A0A1E3M655 A1S_2380 Isochorismatase basF 2.01 2.01 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A5P1UDB1 A1S_2574 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase fbsH 1.99 1.64 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M5T3 A1S_1412 Glutathione S-transferase 1.89 1.68 ROS resistance
A0A059ZT15 A1S_2072 Universal stress protein 1.85 2.02 Stress factor
A0A1E3M686 A1S_2384 Histamine N-monooxygenase basC 1.79 1.76 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M8N0 A1S_2381 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase basE 1.78 1.78 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A7U4X7Y7 A1S_3411 CobW C-terminal domain-containing protein ZigA zigA 1.78 0.12 Zur Zn homeostasis
A0A1E3M6B6 A1S_2383 Peptide synthetase basD 1.78 1.70 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M653 A1S_2386 Ferric anguibactin-binding protein bauB 1.76 1.82 Fur Acinetobactin import
A0A1E3M3K8 A1S_1654 Oxaloacetate decarboxylase bfnG 1.76 1.55 Fur Baumannoferrin biosynthesis
V5VA41 A1S_2863 AhpC/TSA family protein ahpC 1.72 1.48 ROS resistance
A0A5P1UFP4 A1S_2566 Ligand-gated channel protein fbsN 1.70 1.41 Fur Fimsbactin import
A0A1E3M3E1 A1S_1652 lucA/IucC family siderophore biosynthesis protein bfnE 1.67 1.44 Fur Baumannoferrin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M685 A1S_2372 Isochorismate synthase basJ 1.67 1.71 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
V5VE85 A1S_1470 Glutathione peroxidase bsaA 1.66 1.62 ROS resistance
A0A7U4X5T2 A1S_2578 Peptide synthetase fbsE 1.65 1.30 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M665 A1S_2391 Peptide synthetase basA 1.64 1.55 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
V5VIG0 A1S_0453 Biopolymer transport protein ExbB exbB 1.63 1.66 Zur Zn uptake
V5VDG9 A1S_1657 Acetyltransferase bfnL 1.61 1.69 Fur Baumannoferrin biosynthesis
V5VEI3 A1S_1246 Universal stress family protein 1.60 1.42 Stress factor
A0A1E3M3G0 A1S_1651 Siderophore achromobactin biosynthesis protein AcsC bfnD 1.59 1.46 Fur Baumannoferrin biosynthesis
A0A7U4X5W9 A1S_2575 Peptide synthetase fbsG 1.58 1.21 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M7F7 A1S_0558 Aconitate hydratase acnA 1.56 1.39 TCA cycle
A0A1E3M668 A1S_2379 Histidine decarboxylase basG 1.54 1.84 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A059ZIQ0 A1S_1009 Copper homeostasis protein nlpE 1.52 1.34 ROS resistance
A0A1E3M3D7 A1S_1648 Ornithine monooxygenase bfnB 1.49 1.27 Fur Baumannoferrin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M8P2 A1S_2392 NADPH-dependent ferric siderophore reductase bauF 1.43 1.18 Fur Acinetobactin reductase
A0A1E3MBP6 A1S_2892 TonB-dependent receptor znuD1 1.40 1.38 Zn uptake
V5VGU2 A1S_0683 Ribosome hibernation promoting factor raiA 1.39 1.31 Ribosome hibernation
A0A1E3M7T8 A1S_0452 TonB-dependent receptor tonB 1.33 1.34 Zur Zn uptake
A0A5P1UI20 A1S_2582 AraC family transcriptional regulator fbsA 1.32 0.99 Fur Fimsbactin regulation
A0A1E3MCQ5 A1S_2567 Thioesterase fbsM 1.28 1.18 Fur Fimsbactin biosynthesis
A0A1E3M630 A1S_2378 ABC transporter barA 1.26 1.37 Fur Acinetobactin export
A0A5P1UK94 A1S_1647 Siderophore biosynthesis protein bfnA 1.19 1.17 Fur Baumannoferrin biosynthesis
V5VGK1 A1S_1186 Chaperone protein ClpB clpB 1.15 1.14 Stress factor
A0A059ZN38 A1S_2387 ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein bauE 1.15 1.22 Fur Acinetobactin import
A0A1E3M643 A1S_2374 Thioesterase basH 1.14 1.36 Fur Acinetobactin biosynthesis
A0A1L5TMI2 A1S_0146 Zinc ABC transporter substrate-binding protein znuA 1.14 1.10 Zn uptake
V5V9K7 A1S_2834 Large-conductance mechanosensitive channel 1.12 1.05 Ion transport
V5VH78 A1S_0454 Biopolymer transport ExbD/TolR family protein exbD 1.11 1.12 Zur Zn uptake
A0A0E1FM87 A1S_0474 Ferric siderophore receptor protein bfrD 1.11 0.99 Fur Siderophore uptake
V5VI41 A1S_0034 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-2,3-dehydrogenase yciK 1.08 1.20 Fur
A0A1E3M7N8 A1S_0412 Catalase-peroxidase katG 1.06 0.97 Stress factor
V5VHL8 A1S_0136 Glutathione-S-transferase dcmA 1.06 0.92 Stress factor
A0A1E3M8A1 A1S_0980 Outer membrane receptor protein pirA 1.06 1.10 Siderophore uptake
A0A1E3MBF3 A1S_2765 Glyoxalase III (protein deglycase) hchA 1.05 1.13 Stress factor
A0A7U4XBR3 A1S_2076 Outer membrane porin 1.04 0.99 Fe(III)-coprogen receptor
V5VA09 A1S_2692 Universal stress protein 1.01 1.08 Stress factor
A0A1E3M2Y5 A1S_1386 Catalase katE 1.00 0.83 ROS resistance
A0A1E3M5V4 A1S_1411 Glutathione-dependent disulfide-bond oxidoreductase 1.00 0.88 Stress factor
a

See Document S2 for a list of all proteins

b

Genes known to be regulated by ferric uptake repressor (Fur) or zinc uptake repressor (Zur).

Examination of the proteins that display increased abundance under CP stress is consistent with the pronounced Zn- and Fe-starvation phenotype reported previously,30 as evidenced by the large number of proteins (26% of the total) that are components of the ferric uptake repressor (Fur) and Zur regulons (Table 1; Figure 3A). For example, the Fur-regulated enzymes used to synthesize the major mixed imidazole-catecholate Fe(III) siderophore acinetobactin (Figure S3A) (BasA-J), and the inner membrane transporter required to uptake Fe(III)-acinetobactin complexes (BauA-E),64–65 as well as the Fe(III)-acinetobactin ferric reductase (BauF),66 all become significantly more abundant in CP-stressed cells (Figure S3B). In addition, a TonB-dependent outer membrane-dependent receptor and ExbB/ExbD, which collectively energize the outer membrane for ferric-siderophore transport, are also more abundant under these conditions (Table 1; Figure S3). Proteins and enzymes required for the biosynthesis and trafficking of the minor mixed catechol-hydroxymate Fe(III) siderophores, fimsbactin A and B (FbsA-E, FbsH-K, FbsM) as well as the baumannoferrin A and B, also become more abundant (Table 1; Figure S3). The Zur regulon is also highly induced by CP, and includes known Zur target genes encoding the low-Zn ribosomal protein paralog L31B (rpmE2), ZigA,27 and components of the high affinity zinc uptake system, including ZnuA, ZnuD1 and the TonB/ExbB/ExbD system that is regulated by Zur (Table 1).67–68

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Changes in protein abundance upon CP treatment of WT and ΔzigA cells. (A) Pie charts that summarize the statistical and functional characteristics of A. baumannii proteins that increase (left; 141 proteins total) or decrease (right; 45 proteins) in cell abundance in CP stressed WT cells. (B)-(E) Normalized intensity of selected protein paralogs that exhibit reciprocal regulation in WT (housekeeping) vs. CP-stressed cells. Trivial names for each protein and their Uniprot numbers are indicated. Statistical significance according to an unpaired t-test is indicated as follows:*, p≤0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p≤0.001; ****, p≤0.0001

Closer examination of the 45 proteins that display significantly decreased abundance under conditions of CP stress reveals a high enrichment (76% of the total) of known metal (Zn, Fe) or metallocofactor (Fe-S cluster) binding proteins and proteins involved in Fe-S protein biogenesis, including the cysteine desulfurase IscS, and the Fe-S assembly scaffold protein IscU (Table 2; Figure 3A). Fur itself is decreased by ≈3-fold, which is consistent with increased expression of the Fur regulon under these conditions (Table 1; Figure 2B). Proteins with decreased abundance include the large ribosomal protein L31 (encoded by rpmE), and a number of cell abundant, cytoplasmic [4Fe-4S] proteins (see Discussion), including the citric acid cycle housekeeping enzymes aconitase B (AcnB) and the class I fumarase (FumA), as well as a functionally uncharacterized, canonical Zn-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase. In fact, all four of these proteins are reciprocally regulated, in which a companion “low-metal paralog”51 encoded by another gene displays increased abundance under conditions of CP-stress (Figure 3B–E). Biochemical experiments validate this aconitase switch as we find that low-metal induced paralog AcnA activity is completely refractory to chelator (EDTA) challenge in contrast to the housekeeping enzyme, AcnB (Figure 4A; Figure S4); these findings mirror what was found in E. coli, which in that work was traced to a weaker Fe-binding affinity.69 The enhanced expression of a “back-up” aconitase A (acnA) has not been previously reported in A. baumannii, and could be regulated post-transcriptionally, as recently described in Staphylococcus aureus.50 The reciprocal transcriptional regulation of the class I fumarase and Fe-independent class II fumarase, FumC, was previously noted under conditions of iron starvation in A. baumannii ATCC 17978,70 as has the reciprocal transcription of L31 vs the Zur-regulated low-Zn paralog L31B (encoded by rpmE2).30 In addition to these enzymes, two cofactor-synthesizing [4Fe-4S] enzymes, biotin synthase and lipoyl synthase, and a Zn-dependent carbonic anhydrase (MtcA2) also decrease in abundance (Table 2). Two other Zn-requiring methyltransferases involved in methionine synthesis (MetE) or homocysteine catabolism (MmnE) become less abundant upon CP-stress, as does the Zn-utilizing enzyme histidine ammonia lyase (HutH), previously tied to the CP-stress response (Table 2).27

Table 2.

List of all proteins that show decreased abundance in CP-stressed wild-type (WT+CP) or ΔzigA (ΔzigA + CP) vs. WT untreated control cells.

KEGG Entry Description Gene Name Protein Ratio (log2) WT+CP v WT Protein Ratio (log2) ΔzigA+CP v WT Metal Cofactor
V5VCN4 A1S_2423 Large ribosomal subunit protein bL31 rpmE −2.64 −2.58 Zn
A0A1E3MA55 A1S_0480 Fumarate hydratase class I fumA −2.22 −2.23 Fe-S cluster
A0A077G9Y2 A1S_0388 Aldehyde-activating protein: S-hydroxymethylglutathione synthase gba −1.81 −1.81 Zn
A0A0Q2HWF1 A1S_0891 Hemerythrin −1.63 −1.72 Fe
V5VBQ0 A1S_2793 Alanine/glycine transport protein agcS −1.63 −1.63
Q9ZAJ4 A1S_0895 Ferric uptake regulation protein fur −1.57 −1.57 Fe
V5V915 A1S_3104 ATP-dependent RNA helicase deaD −1.55 −1.42
A0A5P1UI52 A1S_3029 tRNA-2-methylthio-N(6)-dimethylallyladenosine synthase miaB −1.44 −1.42 Fe-S cluster
V5VGV9 A1S_0378 Electron transfer flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase etfD −1.41 −1.38 Fe-S cluster
A0A1L5TSN5 A1S_1674 DUF2797 domain-containing protein −1.40 −1.41
A0A1L5TJN1 A1S_2433 5′-nucleotidase SurE surE −1.39 −1.44 Other metal
A0A5P1UKT1 A1S_0020 Isoleucine--tRNA ligase ileS −1.39 −1.42 Zn
V5VAD3 A1S_2714 Succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit sdhB −1.37 1.35 Fe-S cluster
V5VBJ4 A1S_2126-2128 Aconitate hydratase B acnB −1.36 −1.34 Fe-S cluster
V5VAK6 A1S_2712 Succinate dehydrogenase hydrophobic membrane anchor subunit sdhD −1.35 −1.47 Fe
V5VFR9 A1S_0984 Carbonic anhydrase (β-class) mtcA2 −1.32 −1.26 Zn
A0A1E3MC83 A1S_3436 Alcohol dehydrogenase −1.31 −1.33 Zn
A0A059ZUZ0 A1S_1511 Biotin synthase bioB −1.30 −1.22 Fe-S cluster
V5VBJ6 A1S_2329 Lipoyl synthase lipA −1.27 −1.30 Fe-S cluster
A0A059ZJ19 A1S_0756 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit F nuoF −1.26 −1.27 Fe-S cluster
V5V8Q5 A1S_3405 Histidine ammonia-lyase hutH −1.25 −1.58
V5VID1 A1S_0486 Gluconokinase gntK −1.23 −1.06
V5VDU6 A1S_1631 Iron-sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscU iscU −1.22 −1.20 Fe-S cluster
A0A7U4X6J8 A1S_3859 DUF4393 domain-containing protein −1.21 −1.08
V5VBX8 A1S_2713 Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit sdhA2 −1.18 −1.30
A0A5P1UIL0 A1S_0737 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate--homocysteine methyltransferase metE −1.17 −1.13 Zn
A0A0E1FDM9 A1S_0922 Homocysteine S-methyltransferase mmuM −1.17 −1.07 Zn
V5VDL9 A1S_1633 Cysteine desulfurase IscS iscS −1.16 −1.15 Fe-S cluster
V5VJC1 A1S_0071 Aminotransferase tyrB −1.14 −1.04
A0A059ZMZ4 A1S_1235 Cysteine-tRNA ligase cysS −1.08 −1.06 Zn
A0A0D7SED5 A1S_1698 Lipoyl synthase lipA −1.08 −1.05 Fe-S cluster
V5VBX3 A1S_2708 tRNA uridine(34) hydroxylase yibN −1.07 −1.05
V5VCQ8 A1S_1928 DUF2057 domain-containing protein −1.07 −0.97
V5VAB5 A1S_2775 Adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase cysH −1.06 −1.13 Fe-S cluster
A0A1E3M509 A1S_0713 Quinolinate synthase nadA −1.06 −1.13 Fe-S cluster
A0A0Q1DQ33 A1S_2426 Lactoylglutathione lyase gloA −1.06 −1.05 Zn
V5VHN5 A1S_0286 Large ribosomal subunit protein bL12 rpIL −1.06 −0.87
V5VHU8 A1S_0755 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit E nuoE −1.05 −1.00 Fe-S cluster
A0A098SGG9 A1S_0757 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit G nuoG −1.05 −1.02 Fe-S cluster
A0A5P1UHV7 A1S_0705 Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase rpe −1.04 −1.01 Zn
V5V9P7 A1S_3060 Large ribosomal subunit protein bL36 rpmJ −1.02 −0.96 Zn
V5VHZ3 A1S_0736 DUF1852 domain-containing protein −1.02 −1.05
A0A1E3MAB1 A1S_3455 Dihydroxy-acid dehydratase ilvD −1.00 −1.03 Fe-S cluster
V5VAU8 A1S_2343 Superoxide dismutase sodB −1.00 −1.19 Other metal
V5VG06 A1S_0953 Cupin −1.00 −0.45 Other metal

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Measured activities of A. baumannii aconitases, complex I, and complex II. (A) Enzyme kinetics of AcnA and AcnB that have been chemically reconstituted with Fe-S clusters and treated with EDTA. (B) total membrane NADH:ubiquinone dehydrogenase (complex I) activities in biological duplicate as measured by reduction of NADH at 340 nm in untreated and (WT) an CP-stressed cells (WT+CP). (C) Total membrane succinate dehydrogenase:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex II) activities as measured by reduction of succinate-2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCPIP) at 600 nm in biological duplicate. Significance calculated from an unpaired t-test, *, p≤0.05; **, p≤0.01; ***, p≤0.001; ****, p≤0.0001.

CP-stressed cells also show significant reduction in Fe-S-cluster-containing membrane proteins including NuoE, NuoF and NuoG, key components of respiratory complex I, the NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, which allows NADH-carried electrons to enter the electron transfer chain (ETC) (Table 2). In addition, comparable decreases in abundance are observed for respiratory complex II subunits that make up succinate dehydrogenase-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, the ETC entry point for FADH2-derived electrons (Table 2). These findings again mirror results obtained from E. coli, where Fe-starvation leads to decreased abundance of components of the respiratory complexes I and II.71 Both activities are significantly decreased in CP-stressed cells (Figure 4B–C; Figure S5) (see below). In summary, we conclude that at least some fraction of the metalloproteome is destabilized and thus subject to increased turnover. This might be exacerbated by undermetalation of the essential Zn site II in the protein chaperone DnaJ, which would reduce the ability of cells to rescue misfolded proteins (discussed below).

Changes in Cysteine Reactivity Across the Proteome.

We next determined the abundance-corrected changes in Cys reactivity across the proteome (Figure 5; Table 3; Table S2). Of the 2645 total unique quantified Cys-containing peptides, 150 unique Cys increase and 67 unique Cys decrease in net reactivity (≥2-fold; χ2≥9) in WT A. baumannii stressed with CP (Figure 5A; Document S2). Once again, it is difficult to broadly differentiate the CP-treated WT from CP-treated ΔzigA cells (Figure 5B–C), with the changes in Cys reactivity very nearly identical in the two strain backgrounds (Table 3). In no case did we see a large increase in reactivity of a metal-coordinating Cys only in the ΔzigA strain, as might be expected for a ZigA metallochaperone client.3,72 This suggests that if a high abundance client exists for ZigA, it likely involves a metal-coordination site that lacks Cys ligation, or the relevant Cys-containing peptide was not detectable in these experiments.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Change in net Cys reactivity in the proteome with CP treatment. A) wild-type cells treated with CP vs. untreated WT cells; (B) ΔzigA cells treated with CP vs. untreated WT cells. (C) log-log plot of CP-mediated changes in Cys reactivity in the proteomes of WT vs. ΔzigA cells. Solid lines, boundaries of a net fold change of 2 (log2 fold change = 1) deviating from the trendline (dashed line) with the five peptides, corresponding to just three unique Cys, just outside the range indicated; all belong to three ribosomal proteins.

Table 3.

List of Zn or Fe-S cluster harboring proteins and their Cys-coordinating residues that show increased reactivity in CP-stressed wild-type (WT+CP) or CP-stressed ΔzigA (ΔzigA + CP) vs. WT untreated control cellsa

Uniprot Entry KEGG Entry Description Gene Name Modification Position (Cys) Net Cys Ratio (log2) WT+CP v WT Net Cys Ratio (log2) ΔzigA+CP v WT Metal Cofactor
V5V8K0 A1S_3443 Chaperone protein DnaJ dnaJ 164 3.00 2.65 Zn
A0A5P1UGY3 A1S_0221 Riboflavin biosynthesis protein RibD ribD 88 2.72 2.59 Zn
A0A059ZTZ6 A1S_0592 Threonine--tRNA ligase thrRS 333|335 2.55 2.63 Zn
A0A0H4UCN7 A1S_3619 Zinc ribbon domain-containing protein 6 2.16 2.11 Zn
A0A1E3MBL8 A1S_2821 Alkylphosphonate utilization protein 6 2.10 2.04 Zn
A0A1E3MBS1 A1S_2862 Protein translocase subunit SecA secA 903 2.32 2.13 Zn
A0A086HW53 A1S_0531 Small ribosomal subunit biogenesis GTPase RsgA engC 319 2.07 2.03 Zn
A0A1V3DEG5 A1S_2542 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase queC 190 1.93 1.84 Zn
V5VCN4 A1S_2423 Large ribosomal subunit protein bL31 rpmE 38|41 1.88 1.81 Zn
A0A081GYS3 A1S_1566 6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin synthase queD2 18 1.86 1.54 Zn
V5VBJ4 A1S_2126-2128 Aconitate hydratase B acnB 718 1.80 1.72 Fe-S cluster
V5VAD3 A1S_2714 Succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit sdhB 210|214 1.79 1.77 Fe-S cluster
A0A059ZTE3 A1S_1176 Alanine--tRNA ligase alaRS 670 1.71 1.75 Zn
A0A0H4UDV2 A1S_2114 DNA mismatch repair protein MutL mutL 596 1.49 1.42 Zn
A0A059ZMZ4 A1S_1235 Cysteine--tRNA ligase cysRS 30 1.47 1.63 Zn
A0A059ZUZ0 A1S_1511 Biotin synthase bioB 128 1.46 1.41 Fe-S cluster
A0A077G9Y2 A1S_0388 S-hydroxymethylglutathione synthase gfa 33 1.39 1.59 Zn
V5VFR9 A1S_0984 Carbonic anhydrase (β-class) mtcA2 50 1.37 1.19 Zn
A0A1E3M178 A1S_0778 Methionine--tRNA ligase metRS 142 1.37 1.25 Zn
V5VGB8 A1S_0696 ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase 26|29 1.29 1.32 Zn
V5V9P7 A1S_3060 Large ribosomal subunit protein bL36 rpmJ 11 1.26 1.35 Zn
A0A1E3M9N2 A1S_0403 Ribonuclease E rne 401 1.19 1.12 Zn
A0A098SGG9 A1S_0757 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase nuoG 235 1.13 1.26 Fe-S cluster
A0A1E3MA55 A1S_0480 Fumarate hydratase class I fumA 264|277 1.13 1.07 Fe-S cluster
V5VBH1 A1S_2366 GTP cyclohydrolase 1 folE 144 1.09 1.24 Zn
V5VBJ6 A1S_2329 Lipoyl synthase lipA 95|98 1.07 0.98 Fe-S cluster
V5VI79 A1S_0579 GTP pyrophosphokinase relA 662 1.05 1.08 Zn
A0A5P1UI52 A1S_3029 tRNA-2-methylthio-N(6)-dimethylallyladenosine synthase miaB 40 1.05 1.29 Fe-S cluster
A0A5P1UKT1 A1S 0020 Isoleucine--tRNA ligase ileRS 418 1.03 1.02 Zn
a

The Cys shown corresponds to the highest net change in Cys reactivity in the chelate. If two Cys are shown, these correspond to Cys within the same tryptic peptide. The net reactivity changes of other Cys residues associated with these chelates are given in Table S2.

We next carried out a statistical analysis to determine the fraction of the Zn and Fe-S-cluster proteome being probed in this experiment (Figure 6). Figure 6A shows that of the 106 Zn metalloproteins detected in this experiment, 31 harbor a Cys in the first coordination shell (Figure 6A, Table S2). Of these 31 proteins, 22 (76%) display a two-fold or greater increase in reactivity with a chi-squared greater than 9, indicative of loss of the metal cofactor (Figure 6A). To probe the relationship between relative protein abundance and undermetalation, we performed label-free proteomics on soluble cell lysates of unstressed WT, ranked proteins according to their fractional intensities73–74 (Document S3) and highlighted those that were undermetalated in our chemoproteomics datasets (Figure 7A). These 22 Zn proteins in CP-treated cells are present at a median cell abundance that is comparable to all detected proteins and detected Zn enzymes (Figures 7B–C). Interestingly, the median abundance of these 22 undermetalated enzymes is slightly lower than from the seven Zn enzymes that show no increase in fractional occupancy of the metal site (Figure 7D). These data show that it is not uniquely the most abundant Zn enzymes in unstressed cells that become undermetalated in CP-stressed cells.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Statistical analysis of the quantifiable changes in Cys reactivity across the proteome comparing CP-treated vs. untreated WT cells. (A) Analysis of the Zn metalloproteome. Of the 225 Zn proteins (Document S1), 106 were detected at the peptide level in the Cys reactome (left pie chart). 49 of these Zn proteins are predicted to contain a Cys in the first coordination shell, and 31 Cys-containing peptides corresponded to a Zn-ligated Cys (middle). 22 out of 29 Cys exhibited a statistically significant change in Cys reactivity using the cut-offs indicated (right). An additional four Zn enzymes are identified in this analysis if log2 cut-off is dropped to 0.64 (1.5-fold increase in Cys reactivity) (Table S1). (B) Analysis of the Fe-S cluster proteome usijng the same filtering strategy. Of the 92 predicted Fe-S cluster proteins (Document S1), 43 are detected at the peptide level (left). 26 of these 43 proteins had a peptide that corresponded to an Fe-S cluster-ligated Cys (middle). 7 out of these 23 Cys show a statistically significant change in Cys reactivity using the cut-offs indicated (right). An additional four Fe-S proteins are identified in this analysis if log2 cut-off is dropped to 0.64 (1.5-fold increase in Cys reactivity) (Table S1).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Analysis of the relative abundance of Zn (A)-(D) and Fe-S cluster (E)-(H) proteins for which Cys reactivity in the first coordination shell could be quantified [panels (A) and (E)] against all proteins in the proteome [panels (B) and (F)], all other Zn or Fe-S metalloproteins detected [panels (C) and (G), respetively], or other metal-sites in Zn- or Fe-S proteins where cysteine reactivity did not reach our significance threshold [panels (D) and (H), respectively]. Filled, dark circles, those metalloproteins that exhibit decreased metal occupancy; light filled circles, those that exhibit no change or decreased Cys reactivity with CP stress. Dotted lines represent the median abundance of each group, with the significance of difference in the medians calculated from a Mann-Whitney U analysis and the p-values listed above each comparison, *, p≤0.05; NS, not significant.

The opposite behavior seems to characterize the Fe-S proteome (Figure 7E–H). Out of the 43 Fe-S cluster proteins detected, 26 (60%) had a corresponding Cys-containing peptides that was localized to the first Fe-S cofactor coordination shell (Figure 6B). Only seven of these proteins are undermetalated by more than two-fold (Figure 6B), and these enzymes appear higher in median cell abundance than those Fe-S cluster coordination sites that do not reach this significance threshold for a change in reactivity in the cell (Figure 7E–G). This is in direct contrast with that of the Zn metalloproteome (Fig. 7A–C). Further, all seven enzymes that are severely undermetalated are present at lower levels in chronically CP-stressed cells which suggests that the Fe-S proteome might be subject to turnover when not fully metalated (Table 2), i.e., a global Fe-sparing response.75 This is not true of the undermetalated Zn proteome, with just four of the 22 on this list of “destabilized” Zn metalloproteins including L31, whch may constitute the bulk of the Zn-mobilization response.76 Finally, the median cell abundance of these seven undermetalated Fe-S cluster enzymes in unstressed A. baumannii trends toward higher levels relative to those proteins that show no increase in fractional occupancy of the metal site (Figure 7H); this is also in contrast to the Zn proteome (Figure 7D). This analysis suggests the interesting finding that the response of the Zn proteome to decreased cell-associated Zn is distinct from that of the behaavior of the Fe-S cluster proteome, which reflects no difference in total cell-associated Fe (Figure S1B).

Just below the 2-fold increase in Cys reactivity cut-off, are several other metalloproteins of interest (Table S1). These include IscU (C37), the only known Fe-S cluster assembly scaffold protein (log2=0.64) which becomes ≈2-fold more reactive in ΔzigA cells; IscU is also lower in cellular abundance (Table 2). In addition, the cysteine desulfurase IscS that functions upstream of IscU77 is also reduced in cell abundance under conditions of CP-stress (Table 2). These findings suggest a negative impact on Fe-S biogenesis under these conditions. In addition, a 4Fe-4S dicluster domain-containing (ferredoxin-like) enzyme annotated as RnfB of unknown function is also substantially undermetalated under these conditions (log2=0.94). This is in contrast to two other ferredoxins, WrbA and FdxB, that are not substantially impacted by CP stress (Document S2). Another site of interest is C92 (log2=0.93) of peptide deformylase (PDF), an essential mononuclear His2-Cys-H2O Fe(II) enzyme78 that co-translationally cleaves the N-formyl group of the initiator formyl-Met of the nascent chain, the first step in the N-terminal Met excision pathway. PDF remains a bona fide antimicrobial drug target in many bacteria, including recent work in A. baumannii,79 and oxidation or over-oxidation of the Fe(II)-coordinating Cys leads to inactivation of the enzyme in Salmonella enterica.78,80

Undermetalation of the Fe-S Proteome, Cofactor Biosynthesis and Energy Generation.

One subset of enzymes not previously discussed that is affected by CP-mediated Fe starvation is the abundant Fe-S cluster proteins associated with a) biosynthesis of cofactors utilized by the energy-generating TCA cycle enzymes (biotin ligase, lipoate synthase), b) enzymes of the TCA cycle itself (aconitase, fumarase and succinate dehydrogenase), c) enzymes for CO2 fixation (MtcA2), and d) subunits of respiratory complexes I and II, which utilize FADH2 and NADH, respectively, as a source of electrons to power the membrane potential and ATP synthesis (Figure 8). We find significantly reduced specific activities for both respiratory complexes I and II (Figure 4B–C; Figure S5), derived from reduced protein levels, and a significantly reduced metal content in what actually remains in the membrane (Tables 2–3; Table S1). Thus, CP-stress appears to result in significantly fewer functional respiratory complexes in the plasma membrane.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Schematic illustration of CP-induced undermetalation of enzymes involved in respiration, cofactor biosynthesis and energy transduction. The TCA cycle is coupled to the NADH dehydrogenase respiratory complex I and the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex II. These electons flow to respiratory complexes III and IV to create the protonmotive force that powers ATP synthesis (not shown). Fe-S and Zn coordination sites are shown, with stars indicating the Cys that become more reactive under conditions of CP stress. Shaded circles and triangles, see key.

Enzymes in Other Metabolic Pathways that are Negatively Impacted by CP stress.

Metalloproteins that are undermetalated (Table 3; Table S1) are associated with disparate cellular processes, and a number of these Zn enzymes are associated with GTP metabolism (Figure S6). The first two enzymes of the “lower” arm of the flavin biosynthesis pathway are catalyzed by the consecutive action of two Zn enzymes, GTP cyclohydrolase II (RibA) and NADP+-dependent diaminohydroxyphospho-ribosylaminopyrimidine deaminase (RibD).30 C55 in RibA (log2=0.90) and C88 in RibD (log2=2.72) are significantly undermetalated, with RibD among the most profoundly impacted Zn enzymes in the cell (Table 3). These findings are consistent with previous work that showed that A. baumannii employs an alternative 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate synthase (DHBPS; RibBX) that catalyzes the first step of the “upper” arm of flavin biosynthesis pathway in an effort to maintain cellular flavin levels.30 These data taken together suggest that CP-stress negatively impacts flavin biosynthesis with an important bottleneck in the sequential activities of RibA and RibD that occurs specifically as a result of undermetalation.

GTP is also the substrate for the Zn-enzyme GTP cyclohydrolase I (FolE) which makes the intermediate H2-NTP, a metabolic branchpoint in folate and the queuosine (Q)-tRNA biosynthesis pathways.31 A second metalloenzyme QueD2 (6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin (CPH4) synthase) catalyzes the rate determining step in Q-tRNA biosynthesis. Another Zn enzyme QueC, 7-deazo-7-deasaguanine synthase functions in the third step of the Q-tRNA biosynthesis pathway. FolE (C144), QueD2 (C18 from the inhibitory site 231) and QueC (C190) are undermetalated, which pinpoints the sites of enzyme failure in cellular attempts to prioritize this pathway (Figure S6). These observations provide a molecular explanation for the previous finding that CP compromises flux through the Q-tRNA pathway.31

DISCUSSION

In the work presented here, we employ a change in the reactivity of the metal-ligating cysteines in metalloproteins to pinpoint for the first time across any bacterial proteome the impact of CP stress on the metal occupancy of the Cys metalloproteome. We observe significant and widespread unndermetalation that potentially impacts many foundational cellular processes, from energy metabolism (Figures 4, 8; Figure S5) to GTP catabolism (Figure S6) to protein biosynthesis and homeostasis (Figures S7–S8). We take advantage of the fact that chronic CP-stress induces a significant Zn- and Fe-starvation regulatory response under our growth conditions, thus providing a means to evaluate and compare the integrity of the Zn and Fe-S proteomes in the same cells under the same stress conditions. We find that cellular Fe deficiency does not strongly track with reduced total cell-associated Fe under these conditions (Figure S1); this is also true in previously published work.30 This suggests a marked change in cellular Fe-speciation that Fur senses as Fe starvation; indeed, reduced occupancy and decreased levels of cell-abundant Fe-S enzymes (under metal-replete conditions) is direct evidence of a pronounced perturbation of Fe-speciation in CP-stressed cells, which is effectively Fe-sparing (Figure 7). Remarkably, the cellular fate of that spared Fe is currently unknown, but it is clearly not broadly bioavailable. Several possibilities exist, including the presence of a bacterioferritin that has lost the ability to mobilize Fe(II) under these conditions,81 or an an yet underdiscoved Fe-storing encapsulin82distinct from the sulfur-storing encapsulin that is not detectable in CP-stressed A. baumannii proteomes.83

The molecular function of ZigA during adaptation to infected host-mediated nutritional immunity27,30 is difficult to assess from the experiments shown here. The quantitative protein abundance data show no significant differences in the global proteome upon ZigA deletion; similarly, chemoproteomics reveal minimal changes in the net cysteine reactivity across the peptides detected, with the possible exception of several ribosomal proteins, none of which are metalloproteins. Given the anticipated functional similarities between ZigA and two previously characterized Zn metallochaperones vertebrate Zng1 and A. baumannii MigC,3,72,84–85 coupled to the fact that Zn binding to the conserved Cys-x-Cys-Cys motif strongly stimuates GTPase activity,27,57 we would have expected to observe an increase in the reactivity of a Zn-coordinating cysteine(s) within a ZigA client protein(s). Therefore, the absence of such a finding is surprising. One possibility is that ZigA delivers metal to a non-Cys coordination site; alternatively, ZigA may simply interact with an as yet unidentified protein partner(s) in a guanine nucleotide- and/or Zn-regulated fashion, to an interface that lacks cysteines. Clearly, other approaches will have to be taken to identify a ZigA regulatory partner. One such approach would be to globally profile histidine reactivity in CP-stressed WT vs. ΔzigA cells, which may well provide significantly deeper coverage specifically of the zinc metalloproteome and thus the functional role of ZigA.86

In general, undermetalation of the Zn proteome appears more nuanced than that of the Fe-S cluster proteome, and encompasses enzymes and proteins that vary signficantly in their relative cell abundance (Figure 7). In an effort to identify a structural feature that might predispose a Cys-Zn proteome site to metal loss under conditions of CP-induced metal limitation, we further analyzed our undermetalated Zn proteome sites and compared these sites to those that did not meet our statistical criteria for significant loss of metal as well as to Cys proteome. Zn-sites rich is cysteine sulfur ligation might be anticipated to form slightly higher affinity complexes compared to those consisting of lighter N/O atoms;87 in this case, tetrathiolate (S4) sites might exhibit higher resistance to metal loss. We find that fraction of undermetalated S4 Zn-sites matches their estimated percentage in the Cys-Zn proteome (≈50%). Alternatively, the proximity of Zn ligands in the primary structure may also impact Zn loss if cotranslational metal insertion in the ribosome exit tunnel contributes significantly to metalation of the Zn-Cys metalloproteome. If we consider all four Zn ligands as being “close” in the primary structure as within am ≈40 residues in the primary structure,88 60% of the undermetalated sites we observe here meet this definition; however, this is close to the approximate number of sites in the Zn-Cys proteome that that are close in the primary structure. Therefore, we cannot easily identify a specific structural feature in these coordination sites that might distinguish them from Zn-sites that are unaffected by CP-stress. It will be necessary to broadly investigate the thermodynamics of metal binding, as well as the kinetics of metal dissociation to investigate this further.

We also find that the steady-state levels of these undermetalated Zn enzymes are not severely impacted, with the exception of ribosomal protein L31. L31 is expected to have very little structure once dissociated from the ribosome, which will be exacerbated by the loss of the bound Zn, making L31 an excellent substrate for cellular proteases (Figure 3E). Only three other Zn enzymes are characterized by significantly decreased abundance coupled to reduced metal occupancy, including the β-class carbonic anhydrase and two of the five undermetalated tRNA synthetases, isoleucine- and cysteine-tRNA synthetases. This general response of the Zn proteome to metal starvation contrasts with those seven undermetalated enzymes of the Fe-S proteome, all of which are reduced in steady-state abundance, relative to those that retain their Fe-S clusters. This suggests that the metalation status of the Fe-S proteome is more strongly connected to protein homeostasis (biosynthesis, degradation and post-translational modification) than is the Zn proteome, which appears largely uncoupled from proteostasis mechanisms. The reasons for this are unknown, but one possibility is that reduced Zn occupancy fails to engage an unfolded protein response, which might in turn lead to enhanced degradation and cellular turnover of these apo-enzymes relative to the Fe-S proteome. This is turn is broadly consistent with the set-point model, in that the Cys-Zn metalloproteome exists as a superposition of non-metalated and metalated pairs of enzymes, the metalation status of which appears broadly responsive to the bioavailable Zn pool.37 In this case, a careful analysis of the zinc binding affinities of all 29 Cys-Zn enzymes might define the Zn set-point for chronically CP-stressed cells.

The work presented here also suggests that CP-stress has many hallmarks of nutritional stress while at the same time potentially disarming the ability of cells to fully engage the stringent response as a consequence of undermetalation of key players in this process. One metabolic fate of GTP is its hyperphosphorylation to the alarmone (p)ppGpp by GTP pyrophosphatase (RelA) (Figure S6) as part of the stringent response to general nutrient starvation. RelA associates with ribosomes in an unacylated A-site tRNA conformation and contains a C-terminal regulatory Zn-finger domain (ZFD) that has been shown to stabilize the interaction with the ribosome; mutagenesis of a key Cys in the ZBD (equivalent to our hypermodified C662 in A. baumannii RelA) is expected to impact association with the ribosome, which would lead to a reduced stability in cells.89 89–90 This undermetalation of RelA in CP-stressed cells is read out by enhanced reactivity of C662 thus potentially undermining cellular efforts to mount the stringent response (Figure S6).

Indeed, as found earlier,30 CP-stressed cells have a lower complement of ribosomes (≈60% of untreated cells) (Figure S7A); these cells are also strongly enriched in two ribosome hibernation factors, RaiA and Hpf (hibernation promoting factor), each of which binds to the 70S ribosome and inactivates translation via distinct mechanisms (Table 2; Figure S7B).91–92 70S ribosomes purified from CP-stressed cultures appear enriched for Hpf; in addition, these 70S particles are also enriched for small protein B (SmpB), despite no change in its cellular abundance (Figure S7A; Document S2). SmpB, in complex with alanyl-charged tm (transfer-messenger) RNA mediates trans-translation, the major rescue process for stalled ribosomes that result from a defective mRNA (“non-stop”), or an empty (deacylated) A-site (“no-go”) that results from amino acid limitation (Figure S7B), in a process that is functionally parallel to (p)ppGpp synthesis.93–94 Interesting Ala-tRNA synthetase is one of five highly cell abundant tRNA synthetases that is undermetalated in CP-stressed cells, which may in turn compromise this rescue process (Figure S7C). Thus, 70S ribosomes from CP-stressed A. baumannii cells are not only lower in number, but those that are present may be in various states of maturation95–96 or functionality. These findings mirror those in mycobacteria where Zn depletion induces ribosome hibernation.55

The stringent response is employed by bacteria to combat nutrient deprivation. Mechanisms that are used to globally remodel the proteome, including the selected use of tRNA modifications (Figures S6–S7), proteostasis, sRNA regulation and RNA processing (Figure S8), may well be compromised by significant undermetalation of key enzymes that maintain these processes. These enzymes include DnaJ, a housekeeping hsp40-class molecular co-chaperone that helps to maintain the integrity of the proteome (Figure S8A), and which is among the top-most undermetalated proteins in cells (Table 3); further, the Cys in DnaJ that reports on metalation status (C167) is a ligand to a zinc site II that is essiential for the interaction with DnaK.97 Others include a Cys residue in the SecY-interacting motif of SecA, an ATPase motor protein that powers movement of unfolded proteins destined for the periplasm or the extracellular space through the SecYEG channel,98 and the Cys residues of the “Zn-link” motif of RNase E,99 an essential component of the RNA degradasome100 intimately involved in sRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression (Figure S8B).

If undermetalation of the above-indicted Zn enzymes (Figures S6–S8) even partially impacts their cellular activities, this might be expected to induce a broad remodeling of the proteome. These perturbations might in turn be expected to induce a “knock-on” effect akin to Q-tRNA and ms2i6A-tRNA modification (which requires the 4Fe-4S cluster-containing methylthiotransferase MiaB101 that is undermetalated in these cells; see Table 3) in transfer-RNA pools, and in the integrity of tRNA charging itself (Figure S7) under conditions of nutritional stress.102 In fact, some fraction of the proteome that increases in cellular abundance in the “other” category (see Figure 2) may be attributed to indirect effects like these. Additional experiments, including a comprehensive analysis of CP-stressed metalloproteome and the metabolome will provide deeper insights into metabolic re-wiring in CP-stressed cells. This work is underway.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Chemoproteomics and Mass Spectrometry.

Generation of A. baumannii lysates –

Calprotectin was expressed in E. coli and purified as previously reported.12,16 Wild-type (WT) and ΔzigA A. baumannii cells were cultured overnight as biological duplicate in a standard Tris-LB medium used previously.30 The overnight cultures were diluted 1:50 into 2 mL Tris-LB media and given 1.5 h to recover at 37°C. Final cultures were prepared in 50 mL total volume of fresh media in a sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask and grown with vigorous aeration until an OD600 of 0.370 was reached in the absence or presence of 300 μg/mL CP. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 x g at 4°C for 15 min, washed in 1 mL of 1 x PBS pH 7.4, and then immediately frozen at −80°C until further analysis. Cell pellets were thawed and resuspended in 500 μL lysis buffer (PBS, pH 7.4 + 0.1% NP-40), lysed by three rounds of sonication (10 x 1 s pulses, 85% amplitude) and centrifuged at 10,000 x g at 4°C for 15 min to generate clarified lysates. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (BioRad) and lysates were diluted to a concentration of 1 mg/mL with lysis buffer.

SP3 purification and trypsin digestion –

Samples were prepared in biological duplicate for each study condition, for a total of six (6) study channels (2x untreated WT, 2x CP (300 μg/mL)-stressed WT, and 2x CP-stressed ΔzigA cells). For each channel, 50 μL of lysate (50 μg, 1 mg/mL) was portioned into a low-bind 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube with 50 μL of lysis buffer. Each channel was treated with of 5 μL of 10 mM iodoacetamide-desthiobiotin (DBIA) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark with intermittent vortexing every 15 min. After DBIA labeling, 15 μL of magnetic SP3 beads (1:1 hydrophobic:hydrophilic, 50 mg/mL) and 150 μL of 20 mM DTT in 98% ethanol were added to each channel followed by 10-min incubation with rotation. The beads were pelleted using a magnetic Eppendorf rack and the supernatant removed. The beads were washed once with 500 μL of 80% ethanol, followed by the addition of 100 μL of 20 mM iodoacetamide in lysis buffer and 30-min incubation with rotation in the dark. Next, 200 μL of 20 mM DTT in 98% ethanol was added with another 10-min incubation with rotation in the dark. Following pelleting and removal of the supernatant, the beads were washed twice with 500 μL of 80% ethanol. The washed beads for each channel were then incubated overnight with rotation at room temperature in 150 μL of 200 mM EPPS buffer, 1 mM calcium chloride, and 1.5 μg sequencing grade modified trypsin.

TMT-labeling –

After trypsin digestion, 69 μL of acetonitrile and 6 μL of the corresponding TMT-tag (20 μg/μL in acetonitrile) was added to each of the 6 channels and the reaction was allowed to incubate at room temperature with rotation for 60 min. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 35 μL of 5% hydroxylamine in water, followed by incubation at room temperature with rotation for 10 min. The 6 channels were combined into one low-bind 2 mL Eppendorf tube and dried on a speed-vac. The combined peptide/bead sample was then resuspended in 500 μL of 10% formic acid in water and the supernatant removed from the beads on a magnetic rack. The supernatant was then desalted with a 360 mg Sep-Pak per manufacturer’s directions. The peptide sample was eluted in a final volume of ≈1 mL into a low-bind 2 mL Eppendorf tube, with 250 μL of this elution transferred to a second low-bind 2 mL Eppendorf tube for subsequent off-line fractionation (see below “Off-line fractionation…”) and protein abundance analysis. The remaining ≈750 μL in the first Eppendorf tube was subjected to enrichment on streptavidin beads (see below “Streptavidin enrichment…”) and analyzed for cysteine reactivity. Both of the samples were dried to completeness overnight on a speed-vac.

Streptavidin enrichment for cysteine reactivity analysis –

The combined sample (1st Eppendorf tube from the “TMT labeling” section) was resuspended in 1 mL of 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Addition of 50 μL of pre-washed high-capacity streptavidin agarose beads as a 50% slurry to the samples was followed by incubation for 3 h with rotation at room temperature. The bead mixture was transferred to a Ultrafree-MC centrifugal filter (hydrophilic PTFE, 0.22 μm pore size) and centrifuged at 800xg for 30 s to remove the supernatant. The beads were subsequently washed with 3 x 300 μL of 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, with 0.05% NP-40, 3 x 300 μL of 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and 3 x 300 μL of water. DBIA-labeled peptides were eluted from the beads with 3 x 300 μL additions of 80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid (1 x 20 min incubation at room temperature, 1 x 10 min at room temperature, and 1 x 10 min at 72° C). The combined elution was dried on a speed-vac, before being resuspended in 25 μL low pH buffer A (95% H2O, 5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). Peptide concentration was determined by quantitative peptide assay kit (Pierce) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and the sample diluted to 100 ng/μL with low pH buffer A.

Off-line fractionation for protein abundance analysis –

The combined sample (2nd Eppendorf tube from the “TMT labeling” section) was resuspended in 500 μL high pH buffer A (95% H2O, 5% acetonitrile, 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate) and loaded onto a manual injection loop connected to an Agilent 1100 Series HPLC. Peptides were separated on a 25 cm Agilent Extend-C18 column using a 60 min gradient from 20-35% high pH buffer B (10% H2O, 90% acetonitrile, 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate). Fractions were collected using a Gilson FC203B fraction collector into a 96 deep-well plate (0.6 min/well). Subsequent concatenation of every sixth well resulted in six pooled fractions that were dried by speed-vac and then resuspended in 50 μL of low pH buffer A. Peptide concentration was determined by quantitative peptide assay kit (Pierce) per manufacturer’s instructions and each fraction was diluted to 100 ng/μL with low pH buffer A.

LC-MS/MS of peptide samples –

Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of each sample/fraction was performed as technical replicates, triplicate for cysteine reactivity and duplicate for protein abundance. LC-MS/MS was performed on an Orbitrap Exploris 240 mass spectrometer running Xcalibur v4.4 (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano system. Each sample (5 μL, 500 ng peptide) was injected directly onto an Acclaim PepMap 100 loading column. Peptides were eluted onto an Acclaim PepMap RSLC and separated with a 2 h gradient from 5% to 25% of Buffer B (20% H2O, 80 % MeCN, 0.1% formic acid) in Buffer A (100% H2O, 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min. The spray voltage was set to 2.1 kV. One full MS1 scan (120,000 resolution, 350-1800 m/z, RF lens 65%, AGC target 300%, automatic maximum injection time, profile mode) was obtained every 2 s with dynamic exclusion (repeat count 1, duration 20 s), isotopic exclusion (assigned), and apex detection (30% desired apex window) enabled. A variable number of MS2 scans (30,000 resolution) were obtained between each MS1 scan based on the highest precursor masses, filtered for monoisotopic peak determination, intensity (5E4), and charge state (2–6). MS2 analysis consisted of the isolation of precursor ions (isolation window 0.7 m/z) followed by higher-energy collision dissociation (HCD, collision energy 36%).

Database search and quantification –

The tandem MS data was analyzed by the Thermo Proteome Discoverer V2.4 software package and searched using the SequestHT and Percolator algorithms against a UniprotKB database (www.uniprot.org) of the A. baumannii proteome (UP000072389 – 02/15/2024). Trypsin was specified as the protease with a maximum of two missed cleavages. Peptide precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm with a fragment mass tolerance of 0.02 Da. The false discovery rate (FDR) for peptide identification was set to 1%. Oxidation of methionine (+15.995) as well as acetylation (+42.011) and/or methionine-loss (+131.040) of the protein N-terminus were set as dynamic modifications and TMT-tag labeling (+229.163) of lysine residues and peptide N-termini were set as static modifications. For protein abundance analysis, cysteine alkylation (+57.021) was set as a static modification, while for cysteine reactivity analysis, cysteine alkylation (+57.021) and DBIA labeling (+296.185) were both set as dynamic modifications. For TMT-based quantification, a centroid tolerance of 20 ppm was applied for integration, with a co-isolation threshold of 50% and an average reporter signal-to-noise threshold of 10. Normalization of each channel was applied based on the total peptide signal of all peptides. Peptide ratio quantification was based on S/N values, while protein ratios were calculated from grouped abundances excluding cysteine containing peptides. P-values were calculated by ANOVA of individual peptide or protein abundances. Annotation of cysteine function was generated from the Uniprot Protein Knowledgebase (UniProtKB).

Fe-S Cluster and Zn Proteome Predictions.

For the prediction of the Fe-S proteome, we used the MetalPredator server58 to scan the A. baumannii ATCC17978-VU proteome with default parameters. This resulted in a list of 92 putative Fe-S cluster proteins (Document S1). For the prediction of the Zn proteome, we used the approaches previously employed,30,58 creating two libraries of Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiles, one based on known Zn-binding Pfam domains, and another based on specific Zn-binding structural motifs. The former library was created by combining domains with a known 3D structure and domains without a known structure but annotated as Zn-binding. The latter library was obtained by fragmenting Zn-binding sites from existing protein structures, while excluding non-physiological sites. We then used these two libraries to scan the A. baumannii ATCC 17978-VU proteome with the hmmscan tool,103 filtering out proteins matching HMM profiles that did not conserve the Zn-binding residues. This procedure yielded a list of 203 putative Zn proteins, which was integrated with data from the UniProt database resulting in a final list of 225 putative Zn proteins (Document S1).

Multireaction Monitoring for Quantitation of ZigA.

Generation of 15N-ZigA spiked A. baumannii lysates –

Pipette stabs from a frozen glycerol stock of ATCC 17978-VU were transferred into triplicate cultures containing 1 mL Tris-LB and grown with shaking at 37°C for 16 h. Overnight cultures were diluted 1:50 into 1 mL fresh media and given 1 h to recover in the 37 °C incubator. Recovery cultures finally diluted 1:500 into 10 mL Tris-LB with and without 300 μg/mL calprotectin. Cells were collected once cultures reached an OD600 of 0.4, washed with 1 mL wash buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl), and stored at –80 °C until use. Pellets were resuspended in 600 μL lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM TCEP, EDTA-free protease inhibitor) and transferred to lysing matrix B tubes, which were then lysed on an Omni Bead Ruptor 12 homogenizer by performing a standard lysis protocol (6 m/s, 3 min on, 1.5 min off, 30 s total) twice. Lysates were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 10 min and the supernatants were decanted into clean 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. This step was repeated in order to remove any residual beads and insoluble material. 15N-AbZigA was spiked into each lysate replicate with the appropriate amount added based on preliminary lysate analysis and the standard curve that was generated from ratiometric standards. Total protein content in each sample was then measured by Bradford assay.

Preparation of 15N/14N-AbZigA Ratiometric Standards –

Uniformly labeled 15N- and unlabeled-AbZigA were purified as previously described.57 Seven quantitation standards were generated by mixing calculated mass ratios of 15N:14N protein in triplicate ranging from 0 to 1.0. The normalized 15N:14N mass ratios were plotted against their normalized 15N:14N signal ratios for multiple tryptic peptides to generate standard curves.

Trypsin Digest and Peptide Desalting –

20 μg of protein (standard or lysate) was transferred to a clean Eppendorf tube and dried down using a SpeedVac concentrator. Pellets were resuspended in 100 μL 8M urea and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution. Then, 2 μL 0.5 M TCEP and 10 μL 200 mM iodoacetamide was added to each sample and stored for 1 h in the dark at room temperature for subsequent reduction and alkylation. Protein precipitation was initiated by adding 25 μL of trichloroacetic acid and continued for 1 h at −20 °C. Samples were pelleted in a SpeedVac by centrifugation for 20 min at 20,000 x g, and the supernatant was carefully removed. Proteins were washed with 500 μL of cold acetone, and the samples were dried by SpeedVac concentration. Trypsin digestion was initiated after dissolving the pellets in 100 μL 1 M urea and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate containing 2 ng/μL sequencing-grade trypsin. Resuspensions were incubated for >16 h in a shaking incubator set to 37 °C. 5 μL 10% trifluoroacetic acid was then transferred to each digest to quench the reaction and precipitate the resulting peptides. A desalting step was performed using C18 Zip Tips and the peptides were eluted in 25 μL 50% acetonitrile in water and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid.

LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis and Calculations–

Samples were analyzed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer coupled to an Easy-nanoLC 1200. Peptides were loaded onto an Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 trap column (75 μm x 2 cm, 100 Å) in 0.1% formic acid. The peptides were separated using an Acclaim PepMapTM 100 analytical column (75 μm x 25 cm, 100 Å) using an acetonitrile-based gradient (Solvent A:0% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid; Solvent B: 80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. A 60 min gradient was implemented as follows: 0 min, 4% B; 0-53 min, 4-26% B; 53-55 min, 26-100% B; 55-60 min, 100% B followed by re-equilibration to 4% B. The electrospray ionization was carried out with a nanoESI source at a 260 °C capillary temperature and 1.8 kV spray voltage. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode with mass range 400 to 2000 m/z. The precursor ions were selected for tandem mass (MS/MS) analysis in Orbitrap with 3 s cycle time using HCD at 35% collision energy. Intensity threshold was set at 2e5. The dynamic exclusion was set with a repeat count of 1 and exclusion duration of 60 s. The abundances of unlabeled and 15N-labeled versions of peptides were manually determined using the Qual Browser program within Xcalibur.15N:14N signal ratios of tryptic peptides from spiked lysates were plotted against their respective standard curves to determine the mass of 14N-ZigA present. The final number of ZigA proteins per cell was calculated under the assumption that an OD600 of 1 = 8×108 cells.

Label-free Proteomics Analysis of A. baumannii Soluble Cell Lysates.

Preparation of Ab lysates, along with downstream digestion and peptide desalting, followed the same procedures as previously described.30 The LC-MS analysis was conducted in a similar manner to the preceding section. The resulting data were searched against an Acinetobacter baumannii database (Uniprot UP000094982, 3,780 entries, with the database downloaded on 07/06/2017 from Uniprot) in Proteome Discoverer 2.5. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine residues was set as a fixed modification. Protein N-terminal acetylation, oxidation of methionine, protein N-terminal methionine loss, protein N-terminal methionine loss and acetylation, and pyroglutamine formation were set as variable modifications. A total of 3 variable modifications were allowed. Trypsin digestion specificity with two missed cleavage was allowed. The mass tolerance for precursor and fragment ions was set to 10 ppm and 0.05 Da respectively. Peptides abundances were quantified using the Percursor Ions Quantifier node. Protein abundances were estimated from the three most abundant peptides from a given protein and those that were assigned with less than 3 unique peptides were filtered out of the ranked abundance analysis.

Preparation and Characterization of Fe-S Cluster-loaded AbAcnA and AbAcnB.

Cloning, induction, and purification –

A1S_0558 (AcnA) and A1S_2126-2128 (AcnB) were amplified from A. baumannii ATCC17978-VU genomic DNA and cloned into the pHis-parallel1 expression vector at the NcoI recognition site using isothermal assembly. Constructs were designed to include a 6X His-tag followed by a TEV cleavage sequence. The resulting plasmids were transformed into BL21(DE3) competent cells by heat shocking for 45 s at 42 °C. Surviving cells were selected on an LB agarose plate supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin that was incubated at 37 °C overnight. Colonies were then picked, transferred to 1 L LB medium containing ampicillin, and grown at 37 °C while shaking vigorously. Once cultures reached an OD600 of 0.6-0.8, 1 mL of 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to induce heterologous expression. The temperature was then reduced to 18 °C and incubation continued overnight. Cultures were centrifuged (5,000 x g, 4 °C, 20 min), the pellets were resuspended in 40 mL lysis buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM TCEP, EDTA-free protease inhibitor), and then sonicated for 10 min (2 s on, 8 s off, 60% power) in an ice bath. Insoluble material and DNA were removed from lysates with addition of 10% polyethyleneimine (PEI) and centrifugation (14,000 x g, 4°C, 20 min). Recombinant AcnA or AcnB were then bound to a prepacked, pre-equilibrated 5 mL Ni-NTA HisTrap column connected to an AKTA liquid chromatography system. The column was washed thoroughly with Buffer A (25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 25 mM imidazole) before eluting with a 0-100% gradient to Buffer B (25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 1 M imidazole). Fractions containing the desired protein were pooled, concentrated, and finally injected onto a 120 mL Sephadex G75 in buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM TCEP) for additional purification. The resulting purified protein was buffer exchanged into chelex-treated metal-free buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM TCEP) by dialysis to remove EDTA and stored at −80°C.

Loading Fe-S clusters –

Protocols to reconstitute Fe-S clusters into AcnA and AcnB were adapted from previous work.104–105 All buffers and reagents were freshly prepared and degassed the same day. Thawed protein was transferred into an anaerobic chamber containing <1ppm O2, and briefly buffer exchanged into degassed metal-free buffer. Following reduction with 10 mM DTT, eight-fold molar excess of Mohr’s salt (Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O) was added to the protein and the reaction was allowed to stand for 5 min. The same concentration of Na2S was then introduced, and the solution was incubated for 1-2 h. A color change could be observed after 30 min, typically to red or brown. Excess Fe and Na2S was removed after passing the samples through a PD-10 desalting column in the anaerobic chamber. An observable peak at ≈420 nm by UV-Vis confirmed the presence of Fe-S clusters.

AcnA and AcnB activity assays –

Activity assays were performed using the Abcam colorimetric aconitase kit (ab109712). Reactions were initiated by the addition of AcnA or AcnB (500 nM final conc.) into the supplied buffer containing excess isocitrate. Formation of the intermediate cis-aconitate from isocitrate was monitored as an increase in absorbance at 240 nm (ε240nm = 3.6 mM−1 cm−1). For assays containing 300 μM EDTA, enzymes were preincubated with EDTA for 30 min prior to activity measurements. Calculated activities were background corrected.

Purification of Total Membrane Fractions from A. baumannii.

300 mL of Ab ± 300 μg/mL CP were grown in Tris-LB and cells collected as described above. Further purification of the membrane fraction closely followed published methods.106 Briefly, cell pellets were resuspended in 12.5 mL of buffer A (0.5 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5), 180 μL lysozyme was added from a freshly prepared 10 mg/mL stock and stirred on ice for 2 min. 12.5 mL of 1.5 mM EDTA was then added to the mixture and allwed to mix for 7 min before centrifugation at 11,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted and the isolated pellet was resuspended in 5 mL buffer B (0.2 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris pH 7.5) containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor. The suspension was vigorously vortexed until homogenous and aliquoted into six lysing matrix B tubes. Cells were lysed using an Omni Bead Ruptor 12 with the standard lysis protocol (30 s total, 3 s on, 2 min off, 6 m/s) performed twice at 4° C. Lysates were centrifuged to clear cellular debris and pooled into Ti70 tubes, then diluted to the top with buffer B before ultracentrifugation at 184,500 x g for 6 h. The supernatant was carefully decanted and the remaining pellet was resuspended in 2 mL isolated membrane storage buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) by dounce homogenization. Protein concentrations were measured by Bradford assay, and total membrane fractions were stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

NADH-quinone Dehydrogenase and Succinate-quinone Dehydrogenase Assays.

NADH-quinone dehydrogenase activity in purified A. baumannii membranes was measured by the conversion of NADH to NAD+, observed by a decrease in absorbance at 340 nm (ε340nm = 6.22 mM−1 cm−1). Reactions were initiated with the addition of 50 μg membrane protein into storage buffer containing 200 μM NADH and were monitored for 5 min or until the substrate was fully consumed. Calculated activities were background-corrected using reactions monitored without protein. Succinate-quinone dehydrogenase was assayed according to a published protocol.107 Briefly, 10 μg of membrane protein was introduced into a mixture containing 400 μM phenazine methanosulfate (PMS), 100 μM succinate-2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCPIP), and 5 mM sodium succinate in buffer. Reactions were monitored by a decrease in absorbance at 600 nm (ε600nm = 20.7 mM−1 cm−1), indicating successful oxidation of succinate, subsequent electron transfer to the intermediate PMS, and final reduction of DCPIP. Calculated activities were background corrected using reactions monitored without protein.

Purification of Ribosomes from Unstressed and CP-stressed A. baumannii.

500 mL cultures of Ab ±300 μg/mL CP were grown in Tris-LB as described above and cells collected, with tight-coupled ribosomes purified as described108 and subjected to label-free quantitation as described above.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (5.8MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (39KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (3.7MB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.xlsx (636KB, xlsx)

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschembio.xxxxx

Supporting Information including Supplementary Table S1, Supplemenatry Figures S1–S8 and Supplemental References (PDF); Supplementary Documents S1, S2 and S3 (as Excel files), which contain metalloproteome predictions (Document S1), all chemoproteomics data (Document S2) and all label-free proteomics data (Document S3).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge support by the US National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI101171 (E. P. S, W. J. C. and D. P. G.), R35 GM118157 (D. P. G.), R01 AI127793 (W. J. C), and R35 GM134964 (E. W.) and US National Science Foundation (MCA 2122902 to P. V. C.) . M. K. O. was supported by a graduate fellowship provided the Training Program in Quantitative and Chemical Biology (QCB) at Indiana Univerrsity (T32 GM131994).

Footnotes

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschembio.xxxxx

The authors declare no competing financial interests with the work reported here.

Contributor Information

Maximillian K. Osterberg, Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102 United States.

Daniel W. Bak, Department of Chemistry, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3860 United State.

Claudia Andreini, Magnetic Resonance Centre (CERM), University of Florence, Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.

Jeanette M. Critchlow, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, and Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States

Jonathan C. Trinidad, Laboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102 United States

Peter V. Cornish, Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States

Tae Akizuki, Departments of Biochemistry and of Chemistry, and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, United States.

Walter J. Chazin, Departments of Biochemistry and of Chemistry, and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, United States

Eric P. Skaar, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, and Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States

Eranthie Weerapana, Department of Chemistry, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3860 United States.

David P. Giedroc, Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102 United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators, Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Genomic Surveillance of AMR. Whole-genome sequencing as part of national and international surveillance programmes for antimicrobial resistance: A roadmap. BMJ Glob Health 2020, 5, e002244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Capdevila D. A.; Rondon J. J.; Edmonds K. A.; Rocchio J. S.; Dujovne M. V.; Giedroc D. P., Bacterial Metallostasis: Metal Sensing, Metalloproteome Remodeling, and Metal Trafficking. Chem Rev 2024, 124, 13574–13659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Murdoch C. C.; Skaar E. P., Nutritional immunity: The battle for nutrient metals at the host-pathogen interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022, 20, 657–670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Sheldon J. R.; Skaar E. P., Metals as phagocyte antimicrobial effectors. Curr Opin Immunol 2019, 60, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Jordan M. R.; Wang J.; Capdevila D. A.; Giedroc D. P., Multi-metal nutrient restriction and crosstalk in metallostasis systems in microbial pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol 2020, 55, 17–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Lonergan Z. R.; Skaar E. P., Nutrient Zinc at the Host-Pathogen Interface. Trends Biochem Sci 2019, 44, 1041–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Weinberg E. D., Nutritional immunity. Host’s attempt to withold iron from microbial invaders. JAMA 1975, 231, 39–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Weinberg E. D., Iron and susceptibility to infectious disease. Science 1974, 184, 952–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Corbin B. D.; Seeley E. H.; Raab A.; Feldmann J.; Miller M. R.; Torres V. J.; Anderson K. L.; Dattilo B. M.; Dunman P. M.; Gerads R.; Caprioli R. M.; Nacken W.; Chazin W. J.; Skaar E. P., Metal chelation and inhibition of bacterial growth in tissue abscesses. Science 2008, 319, 962–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Kehl-Fie T. E.; Skaar E. P., Nutritional immunity beyond iron: A role for manganese and zinc. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2010, 14, 218–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Kehl-Fie T. E.; Chitayat S.; Hood M. I.; Damo S.; Restrepo N.; Garcia C.; Munro K. A.; Chazin W. J.; Skaar E. P., Nutrient metal sequestration by calprotectin inhibits bacterial superoxide defense, enhancing neutrophil killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 10, 158–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Zygiel E. M.; Nelson C. E.; Brewer L. K.; Oglesby-Sherrouse A. G.; Nolan E. M., The human innate immune protein calprotectin induces iron starvation responses in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem 2019, 294, 3549–3562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Nakashige T. G.; Nolan E. M., Human calprotectin affects the redox speciation of iron. Metallomics 2017, 9, 1086–1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Zygiel E. M.; Nolan E. M., Transition Metal Sequestration by the Host-Defense Protein Calprotectin. Annu Rev Biochem 2018, 87, 621–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Damo S. M.; Kehl-Fie T. E.; Sugitani N.; Holt M. E.; Rathi S.; Murphy W. J.; Zhang Y.; Betz C.; Hench L.; Fritz G.; Skaar E. P.; Chazin W. J., Molecular basis for manganese sequestration by calprotectin and roles in the innate immune response to invading bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110, 3841–3846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Antelo G. T.; Vila A. J.; Giedroc D. P.; Capdevila D. A., Molecular Evolution of Transition Metal Bioavailability at the Host-Pathogen Interface. Trends Microbiol 2021, 29, 441–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Cunden L. S.; Gaillard A.; Nolan E. M., Calcium Ions Tune the Zinc-Sequestering Properties and Antimicrobial Activity of Human S100A12. Chem Sci 2016, 7, 1338–1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Cunden L. S.; Nolan E. M., Bioinorganic Explorations of Zn(II) Sequestration by Human S100 Host-Defense Proteins. Biochemistry 2018, 57, 1673–1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Brophy M. B.; Hayden J. A.; Nolan E. M., Calcium ion gradients modulate the zinc affinity and antibacterial activity of human calprotectin. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134, 18089–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Besold A. N.; Gilston B. A.; Radin J. N.; Ramsoomair C.; Culbertson E. M.; Li C. X.; Cormack B. P.; Chazin W. J.; Kehl-Fie T. E.; Culotta V. C., Role of Calprotectin in Withholding Zinc and Copper from Candida albicans. Infect Immun 2018, 86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Gagnon D. M.; Brophy M. B.; Bowman S. E.; Stich T. A.; Drennan C. L.; Britt R. D.; Nolan E. M., Manganese binding properties of human calprotectin under conditions of high and low calcium: X-ray crystallographic and advanced electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis. J Am Chem Soc 2015, 137, 3004–3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Nakashige T. G.; Zygiel E. M.; Drennan C. L.; Nolan E. M., Nickel Sequestration by the Host-Defense Protein Human Calprotectin. J Am Chem Soc 2017, 139, 8828–8836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Nakashige T. G.; Zhang B.; Krebs C.; Nolan E. M., Human calprotectin is an iron-sequestering host-defense protein. Nat Chem Biol 2015, 11, 765–771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Besold A. N.; Culbertson E. M.; Nam L.; Hobbs R. P.; Boyko A.; Maxwell C. N.; Chazin W. J.; Marques A. R.; Culotta V. C., Antimicrobial action of calprotectin that does not involve metal withholding. Metallomics 2018, 10, 1728–1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Lee W. H.; Zygiel E. M.; Lee C. H.; Oglesby A. G.; Nolan E. M., Calprotectin-mediated survival of Staphylococcus aureus in coculture with Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurs without nutrient metal sequestration. MBio 2025, 16, e0384624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Nairn B. L.; Lonergan Z. R.; Wang J.; Braymer J. J.; Zhang Y.; Calcutt M. W.; Lisher J. P.; Gilston B. A.; Chazin W. J.; de Crecy-Lagard V.; Giedroc D. P.; Skaar E. P., The Response of Acinetobacter baumannii to Zinc Starvation. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 826–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Hood M. I.; Mortensen B. L.; Moore J. L.; Zhang Y.; Kehl-Fie T. E.; Sugitani N.; Chazin W. J.; Caprioli R. M.; Skaar E. P., Identification of an Acinetobacter baumannii Zinc Acquisition System that Facilitates Resistance to Calprotectin-mediated Zinc Sequestration. PLoS Pathog 2012, 8, 20–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Mortensen B. L.; Rathi S.; Chazin W. J.; Skaar E. P., Acinetobacter baumannii response to host-mediated zinc limitation requires the transcriptional regulator zur. J Bacteriol 2014, 196, 2616–2626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Wang J.; Lonergan Z. R.; Gonzalez-Gutierrez G.; Nairn B. L.; Maxwell C. N.; Zhang Y.; Andreini C.; Karty J. A.; Chazin W. J.; Trinidad J. C.; Skaar E. P.; Giedroc D. P., Multi-metal Restriction by Calprotectin Impacts De Novo Flavin Biosynthesis in Acinetobacter baumannii. Cell Chem Biol 2019, 26, 745–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Jordan M. R.; Gonzalez-Gutierrez G.; Trinidad J. C.; Giedroc D. P., Metal retention and replacement in QueD2 protect queuosine-tRNA biosynthesis in metal-starved Acinetobacter baumannii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022, 119, e2213630119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).de Crecy-Lagard V.; Jaroch M., Functions of Bacterial tRNA Modifications: From Ubiquity to Diversity. Trends Microbiol 2021, 29, 41–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Wang X.; Matuszek Z.; Huang Y.; Parisien M.; Dai Q.; Clark W.; Schwartz M. H.; Pan T., Queuosine modification protects cognate tRNAs against ribonuclease cleavage. RNA 2018, 24, 1305–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Pollo-Oliveira L.; Davis N. K.; Hossain I.; Ho P.; Yuan Y.; Salguero Garcia P.; Pereira C.; Byrne S. R.; Leng J.; Sze M.; Blaby-Haas C. E.; Sekowska A.; Montoya A.; Begley T.; Danchin A.; Aalberts D. P.; Angerhofer A.; Hunt J.; Conesa A.; Dedon P. C.; de Crecy-Lagard V., The absence of the queuosine tRNA modification leads to pleiotropic phenotypes revealing perturbations of metal and oxidative stress homeostasis in Escherichia coli K12. Metallomics 2022, 14, mfac065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Diaz-Rullo J.; Gonzalez-Pastor J. E., tRNA queuosine modification is involved in biofilm formation and virulence in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 2023, 51, 9821–9837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Zaborske J. M.; DuMont V. L.; Wallace E. W.; Pan T.; Aquadro C. F.; Drummond D. A., A nutrient-driven tRNA modification alters translational fidelity and genome-wide protein coding across an animal genus. PLoS Biol 2014, 12, e1002015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Osman D.; Martini M. A.; Foster A. W.; Chen J.; Scott A. J. P.; Morton R. J.; Steed J. W.; Lurie-Luke E.; Huggins T. G.; Lawrence A. D.; Deery E.; Warren M. J.; Chivers P. T.; Robinson N. J., Bacterial sensors define intracellular free energies for correct enzyme metalation. Nat Chem Biol 2019, 15, 241–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Young T. R.; Deery E.; Foster A. W.; Martini M. A.; Osman D.; Warren M. J.; Robinson N. J., Two Distinct Thermodynamic Gradients for Cellular Metalation of Vitamin B(12). JACS Au 2023, 3, 1472–1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Radin J. N.; Kelliher J. L.; Solorzano P. K. P.; Grim K. P.; Ramezanifard R.; Slauch J. M.; Kehl-Fie T. E., Metal-independent variants of phosphoglycerate mutase promote resistance to nutritional immunity and retention of glycolysis during infection. PLoS Pathog 2019, 15, e1007971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Garcia Y. M.; Barwinska-Sendra A.; Tarrant E.; Skaar E. P.; Waldron K. J.; Kehl-Fie T. E., A Superoxide Dismutase Capable of Functioning with Iron or Manganese Promotes the Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to Calprotectin and Nutritional Immunity. PLoS Pathog 2017, 13, e1006125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Apuy J. L.; Chen X.; Russell D. H.; Baldwin T. O.; Giedroc D. P., Ratiometric pulsed alkylation/mass spectrometry of the cysteine pairs in individual zinc fingers of MRE-binding transcription factor-1 (MTF-1) as a probe of zinc chelate stability. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 15164–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Apuy J. L.; Busenlehner L. S.; Russell D. H.; Giedroc D. P., Ratiometric Pulsed Alkylation Mass Spectrometry as a Probe of Thiolate Reactivity in Different Metalloderivatives of Staphylococcus aureus pI258 CadC. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 3824–3834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Glauninger H.; Zhang Y.; Higgins K. A.; Jacobs A. D.; Martin J. E.; Fu Y.; Coyne Rd H. J.; Bruce K. E.; Maroney M. J.; Clemmer D. E.; Capdevila D. A.; Giedroc D. P., Metal-dependent allosteric activation and inhibition on the same molecular scaffold: the copper sensor CopY from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Chem Sci 2018, 9, 105–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Pace N. J.; Weerapana E., A competitive chemical-proteomic platform to identify zinc-binding cysteines. ACS Chem Biol 2014, 9, 258–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Bak D. W.; Weerapana E., A Chemoproteomic Approach to Monitor Native Iron-Sulfur Cluster Binding. Methods Mol Biol 2024, 2839, 261–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Bak D. W.; Weerapana E., Proteomic strategies to interrogate the Fe-S proteome. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2024, 1871, 119791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Bak D. W.; Weerapana E., Monitoring Fe-S cluster occupancy across the E. coli proteome using chemoproteomics. Nat Chem Biol 2023, 19, 356–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Fisher C. E.; Bak D. W.; Miller K. E.; Washington-Hughes C. L.; Dickfoss A. M.; Weerapana E.; Py B.; Outten F. W., Escherichia coli monothiol glutaredoxin GrxD replenishes Fe-S clusters to the essential ErpA A-type carrier under low iron stress. J Biol Chem 2024, 300, 107506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Chan A. N.; Chen X.; Falco J. A.; Bak D. W.; Weerapana E.; Li B., Chemoproteomics Reveals Disruption of Metal Homeostasis and Metalloproteins by the Antibiotic Holomycin. ACS Chem Biol 2023, 18, 1909–1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Barrault M.; Chabelskaya S.; Coronel-Tellez R. H.; Toffano-Nioche C.; Jacquet E.; Bouloc P., Staphylococcal aconitase expression during iron deficiency is controlled by an sRNA-driven feedforward loop and moonlighting activity. Nucleic Acids Res 2024, 52, 8241–8253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Jordan M. R.; Dujovne M. V.; Capdevila D. A.; Giedroc D. P., Metal ion homeostasis: Metalloenzyme paralogs in the bacterial adaptaive response to zinc restriction. In Bioinorganic Chemistry and Homogeneous Biomimetic Inorganic Catalysis, Pecoraro V. L.; Guo Z., Eds. Oxford: Elsevier: 2022; Vol. 2, pp 30–52. [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Ueta M.; Wada C.; Wada A., YkgM and YkgO maintain translation by replacing their paralogs, zinc-binding ribosomal proteins L31 and L36, with identical activities. Genes Cells 2020, 25, 562–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Pi H.; Helmann J. D., Sequential induction of Fur-regulated genes in response to iron limitation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017, 114, 12785–12790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Shin J. H.; Helmann J. D., Molecular logic of the Zur-regulated zinc deprivation response in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Commun 2016, 7, 12612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Li Y.; Sharma M. R.; Koripella R. K.; Yang Y.; Kaushal P. S.; Lin Q.; Wade J. T.; Gray T. A.; Derbyshire K. M.; Agrawal R. K.; Ojha A. K., Zinc depletion induces ribosome hibernation in mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018, 115, 8191–8196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Edmonds K. A.; Jordan M. R.; Giedroc D. P., COG0523 proteins: A functionally diverse family of transition metal-regulated G3E P-loop GTP hydrolases from bacteria to man. Metallomics 2021, 13, mfab046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Osterberg M. K.; Smith A. K.; Campbell C.; Deredge D. J.; Stemmler T. L.; Giedroc D. P., Coupling of zinc and GTP binding drives G-domain folding in Acinetobacter baumannii ZigA. Biophys J 2024, 123, 979–991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Valasatava Y.; Rosato A.; Banci L.; Andreini C., MetalPredator: A web server to predict iron-sulfur cluster binding proteomes. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2850–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Putignano V.; Rosato A.; Banci L.; Andreini C., MetalPDB in 2018: A database of metal sites in biological macromolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2018, 46, D459–D464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Pritts J. D.; Michel S. L. J., Fe-S clusters masquerading as zinc finger proteins. J Inorg Biochem 2022, 230, 111756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Lo Sciuto A.; D’Angelo F.; Spinnato M. C.; Garcia P. S.; Genah S.; Matteo C.; Sechet E.; Banin E.; Barras F.; Imperi F., A molecular comparison of [Fe-S] cluster-based homeostasis in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 2024, 15, e0120624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Zimbler D. L.; Park T. M.; Arivett B. A.; Penwell W. F.; Greer S. M.; Woodruff T. M.; Tierney D. L.; Actis L. A., Stress response and virulence functions of the Acinetobacter baumannii NfuA Fe-S scaffold protein. J Bacteriol 2012, 194, 2884–2893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Fleischhacker A. S.; Stubna A.; Hsueh K. L.; Guo Y.; Teter S. J.; Rose J. C.; Brunold T. C.; Markley J. L.; Munck E.; Kiley P. J., Characterization of the [2Fe-2S] cluster of Escherichia coli transcription factor IscR. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 4453–4462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Conde-Perez K.; Vazquez-Ucha J. C.; Alvarez-Fraga L.; Ageitos L.; Rumbo-Feal S.; Martinez-Guitian M.; Trigo-Tasende N.; Rodriguez J.; Bou G.; Jimenez C.; Beceiro A.; Poza M., In-Depth Analysis of the Role of the Acinetobactin Cluster in the Virulence of Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Microbiol 2021, 12, 752070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Bailey D. C.; Bohac T. J.; Shapiro J. A.; Giblin D. E.; Wencewicz T. A.; Gulick A. M., Crystal Structure of the Siderophore Binding Protein BauB Bound to an Unusual 2:1 Complex Between Acinetobactin and Ferric Iron. Biochemistry 2018, 57, 6653–6661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Valentino H.; Korasick D. A.; Bohac T. J.; Shapiro J. A.; Wencewicz T. A.; Tanner J. J.; Sobrado P., Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the Flavin-Dependent Siderophore-Interacting Protein from Acinetobacter baumannii. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 18537–18547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (67).Mortensen B. L.; Rathi S.; Chazin W. J.; Skaar E. P., Acinetobacter baumannii response to host-mediated zinc limitation requires the transcriptional regulator Zur. J Bacteriol 2014, 196, 2616–2626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Hood M. I.; Mortensen B. L.; Moore J. L.; Zhang Y.; Kehl-Fie T. E.; Sugitani N.; Chazin W. J.; Caprioli R. M.; Skaar E. P., Identification of an Acinetobacter baumannii zinc acquisition system that facilitates resistance to calprotectin-mediated zinc sequestration. PLoS Pathog 2012, 8, e1003068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Varghese S.; Tang Y.; Imlay J. A., Contrasting sensitivities of Escherichia coli aconitases A and B to oxidation and iron depletion. J Bacteriol 2003, 185, 221–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Eijkelkamp B. A.; Hassan K. A.; Paulsen I. T.; Brown M. H., Investigation of the human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii under iron limiting conditions. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (71).Ezraty B.; Vergnes A.; Banzhaf M.; Duverger Y.; Huguenot A.; Brochado A. R.; Su S. Y.; Espinosa L.; Loiseau L.; Py B.; Typas A.; Barras F., Fe-S cluster biosynthesis controls uptake of aminoglycosides in a ROS-less death pathway. Science 2013, 340, 1583–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (72).Weiss A.; Murdoch C. C.; Edmonds K. A.; Jordan M. R.; Monteith A. J.; Perera Y. R.; Rodríguez Nassif A. M.; Petoletti A. M.; Beavers W. N.; Munneke M. J.; Drury S. L.; Krystofiak E. S.; Thalluri K.; Wu H.; Kruse A. R. S.; DiMarchi R. D.; Caprioli R. M.; Spraggins J. M.; Chazin W. J.; Giedroc D. P.; Skaar E. P., Zn regulated GTPase metalloprotein activator 1 (ZNG1) modulates zinc homeostasis in vertebrates. Cell 2022, 185, 2148–2163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (73).Wisniewski J. R., Label-Free and Standard-Free Absolute Quantitative Proteomics Using the “Total Protein” and “Proteomic Ruler” Approaches. Method Enzymol 2017, 585, 49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (74).Wisniewski J. R.; Rakus D., Multi-enzyme digestion FASP and the ‘Total Protein Approach’-based absolute quantification of the Escherichia coli proteome. J Proteomics 2014, 109, 322–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (75).Gaballa A.; Antelmann H.; Aguilar C.; Khakh S. K.; Song K. B.; Smaldone G. T.; Helmann J. D., The Bacillus subtilis iron-sparing response is mediated by a Fur-regulated small RNA and three small, basic proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105, 11927–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (76).Gabriel S. E.; Helmann J. D., Contributions of Zur-controlled ribosomal proteins to growth under zinc starvation conditions. J Bacteriol 2009, 191, 6116–6122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (77).Lin C. W.; McCabe J. W.; Russell D. H.; Barondeau D. P., Molecular Mechanism of ISC Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biogenesis Revealed by High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142, 6018–6029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (78).Anjem A.; Imlay J. A., Mononuclear iron enzymes are primary targets of hydrogen peroxide stress. J Biol Chem 2012, 287, 15544–15556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (79).Yang S.; Wang Y.; Yang Y.; Zhang Z.; Li F.; Tao L.; Han L.; Guo S.; Zhang Y.; Jiang Y.; Chang J.; Yang H., Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives as Novel Potent Peptide Deformylase Inhibitors for Combating Drug-Resistant Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria. J Med Chem 2025, 68, 2942–2962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (80).Rohaun S. K.; Chakraborti P. K., Oxidation of active site cysteine leads to inactivation of peptide deformylase from Salmonella enterica. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2025, 759, 151675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (81).Bradley J. M.; Carter A. M.; Bugg Z.; Andrews S. C.; Le Brun N. E., The Iron-Sulfur Cluster of Bacterioferritin-Associated Ferredoxin (Bfd): A “Biological Fuse” that Prevents Oxidative Damage to Cells? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2025, 64, e202511340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (82).Eren E.; Watts N. R.; Montecinos F.; Wingfield P. T., Encapsulated Ferritin-like Proteins: A Structural Perspective. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (83).Benisch R.; Andreas M. P.; Giessen T. W., A widespread bacterial protein compartment sequesters and stores elemental sulfur. Sci Adv 2024, 10, eadk9345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (84).Pasquini M.; Grosjean N.; Hixson K. K.; Nicora C. D.; Yee E. F.; Lipton M.; Blaby I. K.; Haley J. D.; Blaby-Haas C. E., Zng1 is a GTP-dependent zinc transferase needed for activation of methionine aminopeptidase. Cell Rep 2022, 39, 110834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (85).Critchlow J. M.; Rocchio J. S.; McKell M. C.; Campbell C. J.; Barraza J. P.; Krystofiak E. S.; Green E. R.; Akizuki T.; VanNieuwenhze M. S.; Stemmler T. L.; Giedroc D. P.; Skaar E. P., The Zinc Metalloprotein MigC Impacts Cell Wall Biogenesis through Interactions with an Essential Mur Ligase in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog 2025, 21, e1013209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (86).Zhai Y.; Zhang X.; Chen Z.; Yan D.; Zhu L.; Zhang Z.; Wang X.; Tian K.; Huang Y.; Yang X.; Sun W.; Wang D.; Tsai Y. H.; Luo T.; Li G., Global profiling of functional histidines in live cells using small-molecule photosensitizer and chemical probe relay labelling. Nat Chem 2024, 16, 1546–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (87).Berg J. M.; Godwin H. A., Lessons from zinc-binding peptides. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1997, 26, 357–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (88).Kudva R.; Tian P.; Pardo-Avila F.; Carroni M.; Best R. B.; Bernstein H. D.; von Heijne G., The shape of the bacterial ribosome exit tunnel affects cotranslational protein folding. Elife 2018, 7. e36326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (89).Li Y.; Majumdar S.; Treen R.; Sharma M. R.; Corro J.; Gamper H. B.; Manjari S. R.; Prusa J.; Banavali N. K.; Stallings C. L.; Hou Y. M.; Agrawal R. K.; Ojha A. K., Starvation sensing by mycobacterial RelA/SpoT homologue through constitutive surveillance of translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023, 120, e2302006120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (90).Sinha A. K.; Winther K. S., The RelA hydrolase domain acts as a molecular switch for (p)ppGpp synthesis. Commun Biol 2021, 4, 434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (91).Prossliner T.; Skovbo Winther K.; Sorensen M. A.; Gerdes K., Ribosome Hibernation. Annu Rev Genet 2018, 52, 321–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (92).Polikanov Y. S.; Blaha G. M.; Steitz T. A., How hibernation factors RMF, HPF, and YfiA turn off protein synthesis. Science 2012, 336, 915–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (93).Guyomar C.; D’Urso G.; Chat S.; Giudice E.; Gillet R., Structures of tmRNA and SmpB as they transit through the ribosome. Nat Commun 2021, 12, 4909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (94).Moore S. D.; Sauer R. T., The tmRNA system for translational surveillance and ribosome rescue. Annu Rev Biochem 2007, 76, 101–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (95).Schedlbauer A.; Iturrioz I.; Ochoa-Lizarralde B.; Diercks T.; Lopez-Alonso J. P.; Lavin J. L.; Kaminishi T.; Capuni R.; Dhimole N.; de Astigarraga E.; Gil-Carton D.; Fucini P.; Connell S. R., A conserved rRNA switch is central to decoding site maturation on the small ribosomal subunit. Sci Adv 2021, 7. eabf7547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (96).Bennison D. J.; Nakamoto J. A.; Craggs T. D.; Milon P.; Rafferty J. B.; Corrigan R. M., The Stringent Response Inhibits 70S Ribosome Formation in Staphylococcus aureus by Impeding GTPase-Ribosome Interactions. mBio 2021, 12, e0267921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (97).Linke K.; Wolfram T.; Bussemer J.; Jakob U., The roles of the two zinc binding sites in DnaJ. J Biol Chem 2003, 278, 44457–44466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (98).Tsirigotaki A.; De Geyter J.; Sostaric N.; Economou A.; Karamanou S., Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017, 15, 21–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (99).Callaghan A. J.; Redko Y.; Murphy L. M.; Grossmann J. G.; Yates D.; Garman E.; Ilag L. L.; Robinson C. V.; Symmons M. F.; McDowall K. J.; Luisi B. F., “Zn-link”: A metal-sharing interface that organizes the quaternary structure and catalytic site of the endoribonuclease, RNase E. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 4667–4675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (100).Bandyra K. J.; Frohlich K. S.; Vogel J.; Rodnina M.; Goyal A.; Luisi B. F., Cooperation of regulatory RNA and the RNA degradosome in transcript surveillance. Nucleic Acids Res 2024, 52, 9161–9173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (101).Esakova O. A.; Grove T. L.; Yennawar N. H.; Arcinas A. J.; Wang B.; Krebs C.; Almo S. C.; Booker S. J., Structural basis for tRNA methylthiolation by the radical SAM enzyme MiaB. Nature 2021, 597, 566–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (102).Mohler K.; Ibba M., Translational fidelity and mistranslation in the cellular response to stress. Nat Microbiol 2017, 2, 17117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (103).Eddy S. R., Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998, 14, 755–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (104).Freibert S. A.; Weiler B. D.; Bill E.; Pierik A. J.; Muhlenhoff U.; Lill R., Biochemical Reconstitution and Spectroscopic Analysis of Iron-Sulfur Proteins. Method Enzymol 2018, 599, 197–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (105).Marengo M.; Puglisi R.; Oliaro-Bosso S.; Pastore A.; Adinolfi S., Enzymatic and Chemical In Vitro Reconstitution of Iron-Sulfur Cluster Proteins. Methods Mol Biol 2021, 2353, 79–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (106).Cian M. B.; Giordano N. P.; Mettlach J. A.; Minor K. E.; Dalebroux Z. D., Separation of the Cell Envelope for Gram-negative Bacteria into Inner and Outer Membrane Fractions with Technical Adjustments for Acinetobacter baumannii. J Vis Exp 2020, 158, 10.3791/60517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (107).Kolaj-Robin O.; O’Kane S. R.; Nitschke W.; Leger C.; Baymann F.; Soulimane T., Biochemical and biophysical characterization of succinate: quinone reductase from Thermus thermophilus. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011, 1807, 68–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (108).Shebl B.; Menke D. E.; Pennella M.; Poudyal R. R.; Burke D. H.; Cornish P. V., Preparation of ribosomes for smFRET studies: A simplified approach. Arch Biochem Biophys 2016, 603, 118–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (5.8MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (39KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (3.7MB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.xlsx (636KB, xlsx)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES