Abstract
Base excision repair is the major pathway for the repair of oxidatively-induced DNA damage, with DNA glycosylases removing modified bases in the first step. Human NTHL1 is specific for excision of several pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions from DNA, with loss of function NTHL1 showing a predisposition to carcinogenesis. A rare single nucleotide polymorphism of the Nthl1 gene leading to the substitution of Asp239 with Tyr within the active site, occurs within global populations. In this work, we overexpressed and purified the variant NTHL1-Asp239Tyr (NTHL1-D239Y) and determined the substrate specificity of this variant relative to wild-type NTHL1 using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with isotope-dilution, and oxidatively-damaged genomic DNA containing multiple pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. Wild-type NTHL1 excised seven DNA base lesions with different efficiencies, whereas NTHL1-D239Y exhibited no glycosylase activity for any of these lesions. We also measured the activities of human glycosylases OGG1 and NEIL1, and E. coli glycosylases Nth and Fpg under identical experimental conditions. Different substrate specificities among these DNA glycosylases were observed. When mixed with NTHL1-D239Y, the activity of NTHL1 was not reduced, indicating no substrate binding competition. These results and the inactivity of the variant D239Y toward the major oxidatively-induced DNA lesions points to the importance of the understanding of this variant’s role in carcinogenesis and the potential of individual susceptibility to cancer in individuals carrying this variant.
Keywords: NTHL, 1NTHL1-Asp239Tyr, DNA damage, Formamidopyrimidines
1. Introduction
Oxidatively-induced DNA damage, which is caused by endogenous and exogenous sources in living organisms (reviewed in [1–3]), is mainly repaired by base excision repair (BER), and, to a lesser extent, by nucleotide excision repair (reviewed in [4–7]). DNA glycosylases initiate BER by hydrolyzing the N-glycosidic bond between a modified DNA base and the 2′-deoxyribose moiety in DNA, leaving behind an apyrimidinic/apurinic (AP) site. There are eleven human DNA glycosylases generated with various forms in targeted areas of cells such as the nucleus, mitochondria and cytoplasm [8,9]. Monofunctional DNA glycosylases remove a modified base only via an activated water molecule, whereas bifunctional DNA glycosylases use primary or secondary amines to carry out base release, with concomitant lyase activity generating β-elimination or β,δ-elimination strand breaks. Subsequently, the repair is completed by other enzymes (reviewed in [5,10–13]). Oxidatively-induced DNA base lesions are subject to repair by DNA glycosylases with different excision mechanisms, substrate specificities and excision kinetics (reviewed in [14–16].
Among the human bifunctional DNA glycosylases, NTHL1 (also called NTH1) consisting of 312 amino acids with an average molecular mass of 34.39 kDa exhibits an extensive sequence similarity with E. coli endonuclease III (E. coli Nth) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe Nth [17]. NTHL1 has been shown to excise urea, N-substituted urea lesions, thymine glycol (ThyGly) and 5,6-dihydrouracil (5,6-diHUra) (a deamination product of 5,6-dihydrocytosine) from double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides, and to possess some incision activity on UV- or γ-irradiated plasmid DNA as well [17–23] (reviewed in [24,25]). When genomic DNA containing multiple DNA base lesions was used, NTHL1 excised 5-hydroxycytosine (5-OH-Cyt), 5-hydroxyuracil (5-OH-Ura), 5, 6-dihydroxycytosine, ThyGly, 5-hydroxy-6-hydrothymine, 5,6-dihydroxyuracil, 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyAde), 5-hydroxy-5-methylhydantoin (5-OH-5-MeHyd), 8-hydroxyadenine (8-OH-Ade); however, it exhibited no activity on 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OH-Gua) [26, 27]. Using Nth1−/− mice, mitochondrial and nuclear extracts, and oligodeoxynucleotides containing a single FapyAde or 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyGua), subsequent studies provided the evidence that FapyAde and FapyGua are also the physiological substrates of NTHL1, but not 8-OH-Gua [28,29]. The importance of NTHL1 for protecting the genomic integrity and in the prevention of cancers is evidenced by the findings that the loss of its function underlies a predisposition to various types of cancers (reviewed in [6,24,25]). On the other hand, there is evidence that the overexpression of NTHL1 may also be caused by disruption of its interaction with other repair enzymes, leading to genetic instability [30]. Using the GENTS database (http://gent2.appex.kr/gent2/), the analysis with a large number of cancer patient samples showed the overexpression of NTHL1, with significantly different expression levels in a variety of tumor tissues including breast, colon, ovary and pancreatic tumors [25]. Interestingly, NTHL1 may also protect telomeric integrity [31], suggesting a role in aging. Since overexpression of DNA repair enzymes leads to the resistance to cancer therapy (reviewed in [32]), DNA glycosylases such as NTHL1, NEIL1, OGG1 and uracil DNA glycosylase have been investigated as possible targets in cancer therapy, and small molecule inhibitors of their glycosylase and/or lyase actions have been discovered as possible anticancer drugs (reviewed in [16]).
A rare, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs3087468) of the NTHL1 gene, which is defined by a guanine to thymine substitution, leading to the substitution of Asp239 with Tyr within the active site of the protein (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.cov/SNP), is widely distributed throughout Europe, Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. The resulting variant NTHL1-Asp239Tyr (NTHL1-D239Y) has been expressed and purified from E. coli [33]. Asp239 is a highly conserved aspartic acid residue of NTHL1 and its homologs in organisms ranging from Escherichia coli, Bacillus stereothermophilus to Homo sapiens [34]. The location of Asp 239 in crystal structures indicates that, in its unprotonated form, it serves as the protein’s active site nucleophile. Thus, the alteration of Asp 239 to Tyr results in an inactive enzyme likely due to loss of the nucleophilic activity. Biochemical analyses using site-specifically modified oligodeoxynucleotides demonstrated that it was inactive for excision of ThyGly and 5,6-diHUra paired with adenine and guanine, respectively [33]. In addition, AP-lyase activity was greatly diminished on substrates containing an AP site paired with adenine or guanine. Further analyses revealed that, when wild-type NTHL1 was mixed with NTH1-D239Y, a decrease in ThyGly release was observed, potentially suggesting competition for binding to this lesion. Furthermore, the expression of NTH1-D239Y in human cells also expressing wild-type NTHL1 resulted in genomic instability, cellular transformation, chromosomal aberrations, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation- and H2O2-treatment that resulted in accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks. The DNA damage response was also activated in human cells expressing NTHL1-D239Y. These results suggested that individuals carrying the germline NTHL1-D239Y variant might be at risk for genomic instability and carcinogenesis. Previous studies on NTHL1-D239Y were limited to one DNA base lesion and a deamination product of another DNA base lesion in a single sequence context. However, oxidatively-induced damage produces a plethora of lesions from all four DNA bases in different sequence contexts within genomic DNA in vitro and in vivo (reviewed in [2]). Given the design limitations of the DNA substrates in previous studies and the knowledge that wild-type NTHL1 possesses a wide substrate specificity, we sought to investigate the activity of NTHL1-D239Y along with those of the wild-type NTHL1 and other major human and E. coli DNA glycosylases for other pyrimidine- and purine-derived DNA lesions.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Cloning, expression and purification of human NTHL1, NTHL1-D239Y, NEIL1 and OGG1 were performed as describes previously [33, 35–37]. E. coli Nth and E.coli Fpg were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). High-molecular calf thymus genomic DNA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO).
2.2. DNA glycosylase-catalyzed reactions and analysis of excised DNA lesions by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with isotope-dilution
Calf thymus DNA in a N2O-saturated buffered aqueous solution was γ-irradiated in a 60Co-γ source at a dose of 5 Gy and then dialyzed as described previously [38]. Unirradiated control samples were also dialyzed. Aliquots of 50 μg of DNA samples were dried in a SpeedVac. For each data point, a triplicate of 50 μg of DNA samples were supplemented with aliquots of ThyGly-2H4, 5-OH-Cyt-13C,15N2, 5-OH-5-MeHyd-13C,15N2, FapyAde-13C,15N2, 8-OH-Ade-13C,15N2, FapyGua-13C,15N2 and 8-OH-Gua-15N5 as internal standards, which are a part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Material 2396 Oxidative DNA Damage Mass Spectrometry Standards (NIST SRM 2396) (for details see http://www.nist.gov/srm/index.cfm and https://www-s.nist.gov/srmors/view_detail.cfm?srm=2396). The samples were then dissolved in 50 μL of an incubation buffer consisting of 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 100 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 0.1 mmol/L dithiothreitol. The samples were incubated with 2 μg of NTHL1, NTHL1-D239Y, NEIL1, OGG1, E. coli Nth or E.coli Fpg at 37 ◦C for 60 min. For time-course experiments, incubation times of 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 45 min and 60 min were used. For the competition assay, DNA samples were pre-incubated with 1 μg, 2 μg, 3 μg or 4 μg of NTHL1-D239Y for 60 min and then incubated with 2 μg of wild-type NTHL1 for another 60 min. Control samples without added DNA glycosylases were also incubated for 60 min. For another set of the competition assays, DNA samples were pre-incubated with 2 μg of NTHL1-D239Y for 10 min, and then incubated with 2 μg of wild-type NTHL1 for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min. Without the pre-incubation with NTHL1-D239Y, another set of DNA samples were incubated with 2 μg of wild-type NTHL1 for the same period of times. After incubations, an aliquot of 100 μL ethanol was added to the samples to precipitate DNA and to stop the reaction. After centrifugation, the supernatant fractions were separated, lyophilized, derivatized by trimethylsilylation and then analyzed by GC-MS/MS using multiple reaction monitoring as described previously [38–40]. The following mass/charge (m/z) transitions were used for identification and quantification: m/z 448 → m/z 259 and m/z 452 → m/z 262 for both cis- and trans-diastereomers of ThyGly and ThyGly-2H4, respectively; m/z 343 → m/z 342, and m/z 346 → m/z 345 for 5-OH-Cyt and 5-OH-Cyt-13C,15N2, respectively; m/z 331 → m/z 316 and m/z 334 → m/z 319 for 5-OH-5-MeHyd and 5-OH-5-MeHyd-13C,15N2, respectively; m/z 369 → m/z 368 and m/z 372 → m/z 371 for FapyAde and FapyAde-13C,15N2, respectively; m/z 367 → m/z 352 and m/z 370 → m/z 355 for 8-OH-Ade and 8-OH-Ade-13C,15N2, respectively; m/z 457 → m/z 368 and m/z 460 → m/z 371 for FapyGua and FapyGua-13C,15N2, respectively; m/z 455 → m/z 440 and m/z 460 → m/z 445 for 8-OH-Gua and 8-OH-Gua-15N5, respectively. The quantification was achieved using the integrated areas of the m/z transitions of the monitored DNA base lesions and those of their stable isotope-labeled analogues.
2.3. Statistical analysis
Three independently prepared DNA samples were used for each data point. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using the GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 software (GraphPad Software, LLC, La Jolla, California) ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
3. Results and discussion
In the present work, we used an approach different from the previous work to test the activities of wild-type NTHL1 and NTHL1-D239Y using high-molecular genomic DNA containing multiple DNA base lesions formed from all four DNA bases. The technique of gas chromatographyisotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) was used to identify and quantify DNA base lesions. GC-MS/MS simultaneously identifies and quantifies DNA base lesions in a given DNA sample, thus enabling the determination of which damaged bases are or are not excised from DNA by a DNA glycosylase (reviewed in [14]). High-molecular genomic calf thymus DNA was irradiated at 5 Gy of ionizing radiation and used for all experiments. This low dose of γ-radiation in aqueous solution of DNA generates lesions from all DNA bases. The levels of eight DNA base lesions were measured. Fig. 1 shows the structures of these lesions. Seven lesions were excised by wild-type NTHL1 with different efficiencies, namely, cis-ThyGly, trans-ThyGly, 5-OH-Cyt, 5-OH-5-MeHyd, FapyAde, 8-OH-Ade and FapyGua. Time dependence of excision was measured at incubation times from 10 min to 60 min (Fig. 2A-H). No excision of 8-OH-Gua was observed (Fig. 2H). These results are comparable with those of previous studies performed with oligodeoxynucleotides and genomic DNA containing multiple base lesions in vitro, and with knockout animals in vivo [17–23,26–29,33,41]. The excised levels of both cis-ThyGly and trans-ThyGly were the greatest among the measured lesions with the level of the latter being approximately 2-fold greater than that of the former (Fig. 2A and B). Although there are four diastereomers of 2′-deoxythymidine glycol, i.e., 5R,6S and 5S,6R (cis-diastereomers), and 5R,6R and 5S,6S (trans--diastereomers) [42–45], GC-MS/MS cannot separate the cis-pairs and trans-pairs of the excised ThyGly as a free base. Thus, each pair is detected as one separate signal, and designated as cis-ThyGly or trans--ThyGly. This is the first report of the excision by NTHL1 of both cis- and trans-diastereomers of ThyGly from genomic DNA containing multiple lesions. Previously, the stereoselective excision of the diastereomers of ThyGly by mouse NTHL1 and human NTHL1 from oligodeoxynucleotides containing a single ThyGly has been reported with the excision of trans-ThyGly being more efficient than that of cis-ThyGly [22,46]. Our results are on a par with these previous observations on the excision of the diastereomers of ThyGly. In contrast to wild-type NTHL1, no excision by NTHL1-D239Y was detected for any of the seven lesions (Fig. 2A to G). The failure of excision of cis-ThyGly or trans-ThyGly is consistent with the previous work that used an oligodeoxynucleotide containing a single ThyGly without a distinction between its diastereomers [33]. It should be pointed out that DNA lesions investigated in this work possess mutagenic/cytotoxic properties (reviewed in [47,48]). Thymine glycol, the major substrate of NTHL1, is poorly mutagenic, and constitutes a strong block to DNA polymerases and thus, a lethal lesion [49]. In E. coli, ThyGly yielded a low T → C transition mutation; however, it was not mutagenic in duplex DNA [50]. 5-OH-5-MeHyd is also a strong blocking lesion to various DNA polymerases. On the other hand, 5-OH-Cyt and the purine-derived lesions are bypassed by DNA polymerases and paired with non-cognate DNA bases, leading to various types of mutations [47]. For example, FapyGua leads to G → T transversion mutations as it pairs with Ade, and is more mutagenic than the mostly investigated 8-OH-Gua [51,52], which is not a substrate of NTHL1 [26–28] (Fig. 2H). Moreover, FapyGua is formed in cellular DNA in comparable or greater yields than 8-OH-Gua [28,53]).
Fig. 1.
Structures of the DNA base lesions measured in this work.
Fig. 2.
Time course of excision of eight DNA base lesions by six DNA glycosylases. Uncertainties are standard deviations.
We also tested two other major human DNA glycosylases, NEIL1 and OGG1, and two E. coli DNA glycosylases, Fpg and Nth, which are homologs of OGG1 and NTHL1, respectively, to compare their activities for the excision of the eight lesions with that of NTHL1. These experiments were also necessary to ensure the capacity of the assays to detect the substrates of other major DNA glycosylases under identical experimental conditions, and thus rigorously define the limit and preference of substrates for wild-type NTHL1. The results are also shown in Fig. 2A-H. NTHL1 and E. coli Nth exhibited similar activities for the excision of cis-ThyGly and trans-ThyGly (Fig. 2A and B), FapyAde (Fig. 2E) and 8-OH Ade (Fig. 2F). However, the activity of NTHL1 for the excision of FapyGua was at least 5-fold greater than that of E. coli Nth (Fig. 2G). (The fold comparisons are expressed for excisions at 60 min.) In contrast, E. coli Nth exhibited significantly greater activity for 5-OH-Cyt and 5-OH-5-MeHyd than NTHL1 (Fig. 2C and D). The activities of NTHL1 and NEIL1 were similar for 5-OH-5-MeHyd, FapyAde and FapyGua and (Fig. 2D, E and G, respectively). For the other lesions, the activity of NTHL1 was greater than that of NEIL1 (Fig. 2A, B, C and F). OGG1 excised FapyGua and 8-OH-Gua only (Fig. 2G and H), whereas E. coli Fpg exhibited an efficient excision of FapyAde, 8-OH-Ade, FapyGua and 8-OH-Gua, with the excision of 8-OH-Gua being the most efficient one followed by that of FapyGua (Fig. 2E, F, G and H, respectively). Both enzymes excised FapyGua with similar activities (Fig. 2G), whereas the excision of 8-OH-Gua by E. coli Fpg was almost two-fold greater than that of OGG1 (Fig. 2H).
Previously, it was found that both NTHL1 and NTHL1-D239Y bind with similar affinities to an oligodeoxynucleotide containing a single ThyGly [33]. When added to NTHL1, NTHL1-D239Y decreased overall glycosylase activity of NTHL1 for ThyGly, potentially suggesting both proteins compete for binding to this lesion. Interestingly, NTHL1-D239Y has been found to bind to tetrahydrofuran with affinity similar to that of the wild-type enzyme [33]. To test whether this type of a competition occurs when high-molecular genomic DNA containing multiple lesions is used as a substrate, the DNA samples were preincubated with 1, 2, 3, and 4 μg of NTHL1-D239Y, and then incubated with 2 μg of NTHL1. No statistically significant changes in excised levels of DNA lesions were observed as shown in Fig. 3A-D in the case of the four major substrates of NTHL1. When 1 μg of NTHL1 was used, no significant differences between the excised levels of DNA lesions were observed, either (data not shown). We also tested whether the competition occurs at lower incubation times with the lowest possible detection level of excision in a time-course experiment. For this purpose, we pre-incubated the DNA samples with NTHL1-D239Y and then incubated them with NTHL1 from 1 to 5 min. For comparison, another set of DNA samples were incubated with NTHL1 only at the same time periods. The results are shown in Fig. 4. Again, no significance difference was observed between the excised levels of the lesions under these two different conditions for any of the seven substrates of NTHL1. These results suggest that, when present with the wild-type NTHL1, the variant NTHL1-D239Y may not prevent the excision of the substrates of NTHL1 from genomic DNA containing multiple lesions, possibly indicating that no competition for binding to the substrates takes place between the two forms of the protein under the experimental conditions used in the present work. Alternatively, the lesions recognized by NTHL1, and other DNA glycosylases, may not be visible to these enzymes at all times. This is likely, given that DNA is packaged into chromatin inside cells. For example, recent experimental findings indicate that NTHL1 is unable to excise ThyGly from sterically occluded sites in model nucleosomes unless magnesium and ATP are present [54]. This indicates that living cells have a factor that facilitates chromatin remodeling with the purpose of enhancing the initiation of BER by DNA glycosylases. The interaction of DNA glycosylases with various substrates and how they locate these substrates among many undamaged DNA bases has been the subject of extensive studies in recent years (reviewed in [13]).
Fig. 3.
Excised levels of four DNA base lesions with 2 μg of NTHL1 following the pre-incubation of DNA samples with 1 μg, 2 μg, 3 μg, or 4 μg of NTHL1-D239Y. The level of ThyGly represents the total of the levels of cis- and trans-diastereomers. Uncertainties are standard deviations.
Fig. 4.
Time course of excision of seven DNA base lesions with 2 μg of wild-type NTHL1 from 1 min to 5 min following the pre-incubation of DNA samples with 2 μg of NTHL1-D239Y for 10 min ●: incubated with wild-type NTHL1 only; ■: preincubated with NTHL1-D239Y and then incubated with wild-type NTHL1. Uncertainties are standard deviations.
In conclusion, our study presents the first evidence that the variant of NTHL1 with the germline mutation D239Y in its active site is completely inactive for removal of the known seven pyrimidine- and purine-derived substrates of NTHL1 from high-molecular genomic DNA containing multiple DNA lesions. The substrates of NTHL1 are known to possess mutagenic/cytotoxic properties. The absolute inactivity of the variant NTHL1-D239Y toward these major oxidatively-induced DNA lesions points to the importance of the understanding of this variant’s role in carcinogenesis and, also in ageing. Future investigations may take into consideration these DNA lesions as the substrates of NTHL1 in the determination of the underlying mechanisms and the potential of individual susceptibility to cancer.
Acknowledgements
Certain commercial equipment or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify adequately the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Funding
J.B.S. acknowledges support from the National Cancer Institute, United States (P01CA98993) and from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States (R01ES019179 and 1R35ES031708). R.S.L. acknowledges support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States (R01 ES-031086 R01 ES-029357), and National Cancer Institute, United States (P01 CA-160032) and from the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences at Oregon Health & Science University, United States via funds from the Division of Consumer and Business Services of the State of Oregon, United States (ORS 656.630).
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
References
- [1].von Sonntag C, Free-Radical-Induced DNA Damage and Its Repair, Springer, Heidelberg, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Mechanisms of free radical-induced damage to DNA, Free Radic. Res. 46 (2012) 382–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC, Free Radicals in Biology & Medicine, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Wood RD, Mitchell M, Lindahl T, Human DNA repair genes, Mutat. Res. -Fund. Mol. Mech. Mut. 577 (2005) 275–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington, D.C, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [6].Wallace SS, Murphy DL, Sweasy JB, Base excision repair and cancer, Cancer Lett. 327 (2012) 73–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].D’Errico M, Parlanti E, Pascucci B, Fortini P, Baccarini S, Simonelli V, Dogliotti E, Single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA glycosylases: From function to disease, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 107 (2017) 278–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Li J, Svilar D, McClellan S, Kim JH, Ahn EE, Vens C, Wilson DM 3rd, Sobol RW, DNA Repair Molecular Beacon assay: a platform for real-time functional analysis of cellular DNA repair capacity, Oncotarget 9 (2018) 31719–31743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Lee AJ, Wallace SS, The DNA glycosylases that recognize and remove free radical-damaged pyrimidines, in: Wilson DM III (Ed.), The Base Excision Repair Pathway, World Scientific, New Jersey, 2017, pp. 117–188. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Wallace SS, DNA glycosylases search for and remove oxidized DNA bases, Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 54 (2013) 691–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Wallace SS, Base excision repair: a critical player in many games, DNA Repair 19 (2014) 14–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Nelson SR, Dunn AR, Kathe SD, Warshaw DM, Wallace SS, Two glycosylase families diffusively scan DNA using a wedge residue to probe for and identify oxidatively damaged bases, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 (2014) E2091–E2099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Lee AJ, Wallace SS, Hide and seek: How do DNA glycosylases locate oxidatively damaged DNA bases amidst a sea of undamaged bases? Free Radic. Biol. Med. 107 (2017) 170–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Dizdaroglu M, Coskun E, Jaruga P, Repair of oxidatively induced DNA damage by DNA glycosylases: mechanisms of action, substrate specificities and excision kinetics, Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 771 (2017) 99–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Endutkin AV, Zharkov DO, Substrate specificities of DNA glycosylases in vitro and in vivo, in: Dizdaroglu M, Lloyd RS (Eds.), DNA Damage, DNA Repair and Disease, Volume 1, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2021, pp. 175–203. [Google Scholar]
- [16].McCullough AK, Minko IG, Nilsen A, Nagarajan S, Lloyd RS, Modulation of DNA glycosylase activities via small molecules, in: Dizdaroglu M, Lloyd RS (Eds.), DNA Damage, DNA Repair and Disease, Volume 1, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2021, pp. 323–347. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Aspinwall R, Rothwell DG, Roldan-Arjona T, Anselmino C, Ward CJ, Cheadle JP, Sampson JR, Lindahl T, Harris PC, Hickson ID, Cloning and characterization of a functional human homolog of Escherichia coli endonuclease III, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 109–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Jen J, Mitchell DL, Cunningham RP, Smith CA, Taylor JS, Cleaver JE, Ultraviolet irradiation produces novel endonuclease III-sensitive cytosine photoproducts at dipyrimidine sites, Photochem. Photobiol. 65 (1997) 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Ikeda S, Biswas T, Roy R, Izumi T, Boldogh I, Kurosky A, Sarker AH, Seki S, Mitra S, Purification and characterization of human NTH1, a homolog of Escherichia coli endonuclease III. Direct identification of Lys-212 as the active nucleophilic residue, J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 21585–21593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Eide L, Luna L, Gustad EC, Henderson PT, Essigmann JM, Demple B, Seeberg E, Human endonuclease III acts preferentially on DNA damage opposite guanine residues in DNA, Biochemistry 40 (2001) 6653–6659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Marenstein DR, Chan MK, Altamirano A, Basu AK, Boorstein RJ, Cunningham RP, Teebor GW, Substrate specificity of human endonuclease III (hNTH1). Effect of human APE1 on hNTH1 activity, J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 9005–9012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Ocampo-Hafalla MT, Altamirano A, Basu AK, Chan MK, Ocampo JE, Cummings A Jr., Boorstein RJ, Cunningham RP, Teebor GW, Repair of thymine glycol by hNth1 and hNeil1 is modulated by base pairing and cis-trans epimerization, DNA Repair 5 (2006) 444–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Carroll BL, Zahn KE, Hanley JP, Wallace SS, Dragon JA, Doublie S, Caught in motion: human NTHL1 undergoes interdomain rearrangement necessary for catalysis, Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (2021) 13165–13178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Das L, Quintana VG, Sweasy JB, NTHL1 in genomic integrity, aging and cancer, DNA Repair 93 (2020), 102920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Kar A, Degtyareva NP, Doetsch PW, Redox stress responses and human disease: NTHL1 at the intersection of DNA damage repair and cancer, in: Dizdaroglu M, Lloyd RS (Eds.), DNA Damage, DNA Repair and Disease, Volume 1, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2021, pp. 279–300. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Dizdaroglu M, Karahalil B, Senturker S, Buckley TJ, Roldan-Arjona T, Excision of products of oxidative DNA base damage by human NTH1 protein, Biochemistry 38 (1999) 243–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Marsden CG, Jaruga P, Coskun E, Maher RL, Pederson DS, Dizdaroglu M, Sweasy JB, Expression of a germline variant in the N-terminal domain of the human DNA glycosylase NTHL1 induces cellular transformation without impairing enzymatic function or substrate specificity, Oncotarget 11 (2020) 2262–2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Hu J, de Souza-Pinto NC, Haraguchi K, Hogue BA, Jaruga P, Greenberg MM, Dizdaroglu M, Bohr VA, Repair of formamidopyrimidines in DNA involves different glycosylases: role of the OGG1, NTH1, and NEIL1 enzymes, J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 40544–40551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Chan MK, Ocampo-Hafalla MT, Vartanian V, Jaruga P, Kirkali G, Koenig KL, Brown S, Lloyd RS, Dizdaroglu M, Teebor GW, Targeted deletion of the genes encoding NTH1 and NEIL1 DNA N-glycosylases reveals the existence of novel carcinogenic oxidative damage to DNA, DNA Repair 8 (2009) 786–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Limpose KL, Trego KS, Li Z, Leung SW, Sarker AH, Shah JA, Ramalingam SS, Werner EM, Dynan WS, Cooper PK, Corbett AH, Doetsch PW, Overexpression of the base excision repair NTHL1 glycosylase causes genomic instability and early cellular hallmarks of cancer, Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (2018) 4515–4532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Vallabhaneni H, O’Callaghan N, Sidorova J, Liu Y, Defective repair of oxidative base lesions by the DNA glycosylase Nth1 associates with multiple telomere defects, PLoS Genet 9 (2013), e1003639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Kelley MR, Fishel ML, Overview of DNA repair pathways, current targets, and clinical trials bench to clinic, in: Kelley MR, Fishel ML (Eds.), DNA Repair in Cancer Therapy, Molecular Targets and Clinical Applications, Second ed., Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, 2016, pp. 1–54. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Galick HA, Kathe S, Liu M, Robey-Bond S, Kidane D, Wallace SS, Sweasy JB, Germ-line variant of human NTH1 DNA glycosylase induces genomic instability and cellular transformation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (2013) 14314–14319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Thayer MM, Ahern H, Xing D, Cunningham RP, Tainer JA, Novel DNA binding motifs in the DNA repair enzyme endonuclease III crystal structure, EMBO J. 14 (1995) 4108–4120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Roy LM, Jaruga P, Wood TG, McCullough AK, Dizdaroglu M, Lloyd RS, Human polymorphic variants of the NEIL1 DNA glycosylase, J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 15790–15798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Donley N, Jaruga P, Coskun E, Dizdaroglu M, McCullough AK, Lloyd RS, Small molecule inhibitors of 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase-1 (OGG1), ACS Chem. Biol. 10 (2015) 2334–2343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Kant M, Tahara YK, Jaruga P, Coskun E, Lloyd RS, Kool ET, Dizdaroglu M, Inhibition by tetrahydroquinoline sulfonamide derivatives of the activity of human 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) for several products of oxidatively induced DNA base lesions, ACS Chem. Biol. 16 (2021) 45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Reddy PT, Jaruga P, Nelson BC, Lowenthal M, Dizdaroglu M, Stable isotope-labeling of DNA repair proteins, and their purification and characterization, Protein Expr. Purif. 78 (2011) 94–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Jaruga P, Kirkali G, Dizdaroglu M, Measurement of formamidopyrimidines in DNA, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 45 (2008) 1601–1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Jaruga P, Coskun E, Kimbrough K, Jacob A, Johnson WE, Dizdaroglu M, Biomarkers of oxidatively induced DNA damage in dreissenid mussels: a genotoxicity assessment tool for the Laurentian Great Lakes, Environ. Toxicol. 32 (2017) 2144–2153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Ocampo MTA, Chaung W, Marenstein DR, Chan MK, Altamirano A, Basu AK, Boorstein RJ, Cunningham RP, Teebor GW, Targeted deletion of mNth1 reveals a novel DNA repair enzyme activity, Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 6111–6121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Brown KL, Adams T, Jasti VP, Basu AK, Stone MP, Interconversion of the cis-5R,6S- and trans-5R,6R-thymine glycol lesions in duplex DNA, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 11701–11710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Vaishnav Y, Holwitt E, Swenberg C, Lee HC, Kan LS, Synthesis and characterization of stereoisomers of 5,6-dihydro-5,6-dihydroxy-thymidine, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 8 (1991) 935–951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Lustig MJ, Cadet J, Boorstein RJ, Teebor GW, Synthesis of the diastereomers of thymidine glycol, determination of concentrations and rates of interconversion of their cis-trans epimers at equilibrium and demonstration of differential alkali lability within DNA, Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (1992) 4839–4845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Wang Y, HPLC isolation and mass spectrometric characterization of two isomers of thymine glycols in oligodeoxynucleotides, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15 (2002) 671–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Miller H, Fernandes AS, Zaika E, McTigue MM, Torres MC, Wente M, Iden CR, Grollman AP, Stereoselective excision of thymine glycol from oxidatively damaged DNA, Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 338–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Wallace SS, Biological consequences of free radical-damaged DNA bases, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 33 (2002) 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Dizdaroglu M, Oxidatively induced DNA damage and its repair in cancer, Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 763 (2015) 212–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Hayes RC, Petrullo LA, Huang H, Wallace SS, Leclerc JE, Oxidative damage in DNA - lack of mutagenicity by thymine glycol lesions, J. Mol. Biol. 201 (1988) 239–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Basu AK, Loechler EL, Leadon SA, Essigmann JM, Genetic effects of thymine glycol: Site-specific mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989) 7677–7681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Kalam MA, Haraguchi K, Chandani S, Loechler EL, Moriya M, Greenberg MM, Basu AK, Genetic effects of oxidative DNA damages: comparative mutagenesis of the imidazole ring-opened formamidopyrimidines (Fapy lesions) and 8-oxo-purines in simian kidney cells, Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) 2305–2315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Ryan BJ, Yang H, Bacurio JHT, Smith MR, Basu AK, Greenberg MM, Freudenthal BD, Structural dynamics of a common mutagenic oxidative DNA lesion in duplex DNA and during DNA replication, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 8054–8065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Dizdaroglu M, Kirkali G, Jaruga P, Formamidopyrimidines in DNA: mechanisms of formation, repair, and biological effects, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 45 (2008) 1610–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Maher RL, Marsden CG, Averill AM, Wallace SS, Sweasy JB, Pederson DS, Human cells contain a factor that facilitates the DNA glycosylase-mediated excision of oxidized bases from occluded sites in nucleosomes, DNA Repair 57 (2017) 91–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




