Skip to main content
ACS Central Science logoLink to ACS Central Science
. 2025 Aug 1;11(9):1762–1772. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5c00909

Copper-Catalyzed Asymmetric Cyclizative Sulfinamidation: Forging Indole-Based Stereogenic Sulfur(IV) Centers and Atropisomeric Chirality

Xiaowu Fang , Fengrui Xiang , Yue Zhao , Zhuangzhi Shi †,‡,§,*
PMCID: PMC12464752  PMID: 41019106

Abstract

The structural prominence of indole-based sulfur-containing compounds in pharmacologically relevant substances stems from their versatile biofunctional capabilities. Despite their significance, the stereogenic elements embedded in these structures have frequently been overlooked in drug discovery endeavors primarily due to the absence of efficient synthetic methodologies. Here, we introduce a groundbreaking strategy for the enantioselective synthesis of indole-based sulfinamides via a copper-catalyzed asymmetric nucleophilic cyclization and sulfinamidation reaction. Utilizing ortho-alkynylanilines and sulfinylamines, this method achieves a broad spectrum of sulfinamides with complete atom economy, establishing a new paradigm in synthetic efficiency. Our approach not only facilitates the formation of S-chirogenic sulfinamides but also concurrently constructs products featuring both stereogenic sulfur and atropisomeric chirality. Comprehensive mechanistic investigations, complemented by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, provide deep insights into the reaction mechanism, particularly in elucidating the S-stereogenic and atropisomeric control during the cyclization and sulfinamidation processes.


graphic file with name oc5c00909_0009.jpg


graphic file with name oc5c00909_0008.jpg

Introduction

Atropisomeric (hetero)­biaryls constitute a privileged class of compounds with broad applications across medicinal chemistry, catalysis, and materials science. , This significance has spurred the development of numerous advanced synthetic approaches. Particularly noteworthy are atropisomeric indole derivatives, which hold considerable importance due to their prevalence in natural alkaloids, bioactive molecules, chiral ligands, and organocatalysts. Consequently, the catalytic asymmetric synthesis of axially chiral indoles, especially those incorporating oxygen and nitrogen functional groups, has become a focal point of research (Figure A). A significant milestone in this field was achieved in 2010 when Kitagawa reported the palladium-catalyzed asymmetric cyclization of ortho-alkynylanilines, despite modest enantioselectivity. This strategy has since proven to be remarkably effective and versatile, enabling the construction of atropisomeric indoles through catalysis by both precious metals , and organocatalysts. In parallel, indole-based sulfur-containing compounds have attracted considerable attention owing to their therapeutic and agrochemical potential. Nonetheless, the stereogenic elements are frequently overlooked in drug discovery initiatives. , Therefore, the development of a general methodology to incorporate the backbone and central chirality into these indole frameworks holds significant promise for expanding the chemical space and enhancing the prospects of discovering novel drug leads with improved pharmacological properties.

1.

1

(A) Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of atropisomeric indoles. (B) Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of S-chirogenic sulfinamides by aryl-addition to sulfinylamines. (C) Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of atropisomerically chiral sulfoxonium ylides. (D) Copper-catalyzed asymmetric cyclizative sulfinamidation for indole-based stereogenic sulfur­(IV) centers and atropisomeric chirality.

Sulfur’s distinctive capacity to generate a wide array of chiral configurations, enabled by its varied oxidation states including S­(IV) and S­(VI) stereogenic centers, markedly increases the structural variety and intricacy of prospective pharmaceutical compounds. Among them, sulfinamides, particularly those featuring stereogenic sulfur­(IV) centers, have gained prominence as pivotal intermediates in synthetic chemistry due to their unique equilibrium between stability and reactivity. Substantial advancements have been made in their synthetic methodologies. Chiral organocatalysts, such as 4-arylpyridine N-oxides, and quinine derivatives, have been successfully employed in the nucleophilic substitution of sulfinates with amines. , Additionally, these compounds can be synthesized using anionic stereogenic cobalt complexes, which involve an enantiopure sulfinimidoyl iodide intermediate. Notably, recent innovations have introduced asymmetric metal-catalyzed additions of boron compounds to sulfinylamines as a novel strategy for the preparation of aryl sulfinamides (Figure B). , Moreover, aryl halides have been effectively added to sulfinylamines under reductive conditions, enabled by Earth-abundant metals. , In contrast, the development of axially chiral organosulfur compounds has progressed at a notably slower pace. In 2024, Huang and colleagues achieved a significant breakthrough by successfully synthesizing atropisomerically chiral sulfoxonium ylides using chiral phosphoric acids (Figure C). Inspired by these advancements, we aimed to design and synthesize indole-based sulfinamides that incorporate both stereogenic sulfur centers and atropisomeric chirality.

Herein, we report a copper-catalyzed protocol that achieves both high enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity in the nucleophilic cyclization of ortho-alkynylanilines, subsequently enabling sulfinamidation with sulfinylamines (Figure D). Although nucleophilic cyclization of ortho-alkynylanilines has been previously documented by copper catalysis, the development of enantioselective transformation has remained elusive. Our innovative methodology not only enables the efficient formation of S-chirogenic indole-based sulfinamides but also facilitates the construction of products that concurrently possess stereogenic sulfur­(IV) centers and atropisomeric chirality. Given the profound synthetic significance of these two pivotal stereochemical elements, their simultaneous integration into a single indole framework opens up unprecedented avenues for the assembly of structurally complex molecules with high precision and diversity.

Results and Discussion

The feasibility of the reaction between ortho-alkynylaniline 1a and sulfinylamine I was explored (Table ). Initially, we developed a reaction system using 10 mol % of CuBr and 12 mol % of (R, R)-BINAP (L1), along with 1.2 equiv of K2CO3, in THF at 40 °C for 12 h under N2 atmosphere (entry 1). This approach, however, yielded the target product 1b in only trace amounts. Switching the ligand to (R, R)-Ph-BPE (L2) resulted in a modest improvement, with a 10% yield of 1b and 17% ee (entry 2). The use of (S)-MeO-BIPHEP (L3) slightly increased the yield to 16%, but the enantioselectivity decreased (entry 3). Utilizing Josiphos L4 improved the enantioselectivity to 26% ee (entry 4). Notably, when Josiphos L5, featuring a bulky aryl group on the phosphorus atom, was employed, the enantioselectivity increased dramatically to 92% ee, although the yield remained low (entry 5). Further modifications to this ligand motif, such as using Josiphos L6, significantly reduced the enantioselectivity (entry 6). Experiments with alternative carbonates, such as Li2CO3, resulted in low conversion (entry 7), but the use of LiO t Bu as the base increased the enantioselectivity to 94% (entry 8). Increasing the amount of base to 3.0 equiv improved the yield of 1b to 31% (entry 9). Extending the reaction time to 40 h further increased the yield to 49%, while maintaining high enantioselectivity (entry 10). The choice of solvent was critical for achieving high enantioselectivity. Notably, using 1,3-dioxolane (extra dry, stored with molecular sieves) as the solvent produced 1b with an outstanding 95% ee and 89% yield (entry 11). Furthermore, an X-ray crystallographic analysis was performed on product 1b, unequivocally confirming its S absolute configuration. Experiments with other copper sources, such as CuI, CuCl, and CuBr2, were less successful (entries 12–14). Reducing the catalyst loading to 5 mol % still maintained good reactivity, affording 1b in 82% yield and 88% ee (entry 15). Finally, control reactions highlighted the essential role of the copper salt, and omitting it led to no reaction occurring (entry 16).

1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions .

graphic file with name oc5c00909_0005.jpg

entry [Cu] (mol %) ligand (mol %) base (equiv) solvent time (h) yield of 1b (%) ee of 1b (%)
1 CuBr (10) L1 (12) K2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 <5 -
2 CuBr (10) L2 (12) K2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 10 17
3 CuBr (10) L3 (12) K2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 16 –7
4 CuBr (10) L4 (12) K2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 12 26
5 CuBr (10) L5 (12) K2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 6 92
6 CuBr (10) L6 (12) K2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 6 72
7 CuBr (10) L5 (12) Li2CO3 (1.2) THF 12 trace -
8 CuBr (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (1.2) THF 12 10 94
9 CuBr (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) THF 12 31 92
10 CuBr (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) THF 40 49 92
11 CuBr (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) 1,3-dioxolane 40 89 (84) 95
12 CuI (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) 1,3-dioxolane 40 24 95
13 CuCl (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) 1,3-dioxolane 40 86 84
14 CuBr2 (10) L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) 1,3-dioxolane 40 65 67
15 CuBr (5) L5 (6) LiO t Bu (3.0) 1,3-dioxolane 40 82 88
16 - L5 (12) LiO t Bu (3.0) 1,3-dioxolane 40 0 -
a

Reaction conditions: Cu salt (5–10 mol %), ligand (6–12 mol %), 1a (1.0 equiv), sulfinylamine I (1.0–3.0 equiv), base (1.2–3.0 equiv) in anhydrous solvent (0.1 M) at 40 °C under N2 atmosphere.

b

Yield by 1H NMR with mesitylene as internal standard.

c

Enantiomeric excess (ee) by chiral HPLC.

d

Isolated yield.

With the reaction conditions set, we undertook a series of experiments to explore the scope of ortho-alkynylanilines with sulfinylamine I (Table ). We began our exploration by examining the reactivity of arylethynyl anilines substituted with methyl (2a), ethyl (3a), isopropyl (4a), tert-butyl (5a), and phenyl (6a) groups. These reactions produced the desired products 2b6b effectively. Anilines containing methoxy (7a, 8a) and NMe2 (9a) also proceeded efficiently, yielding the target compounds 7b9b with notably high enantioselectivities. Notably, a broad range of derivatives featuring halide-containing substituents, including fluorine (10a, 11a), chlorine (12a), bromine (13a), and trifluoromethyl (14a), were well-tolerated with sulfinylamine I, producing the corresponding products 10b14b with excellent enantioselectivities. Additionally, the use of trimethylsilyl-containing substrate 15a did not hinder the formation of the desired C–S bond, resulting in product 15b. In addition to aromatic motifs, heteroaryl-substituted ethynyl anilines, such as benzofuran (16a) and 1-methylindole (17a), were successfully subjected to the system, yielding products 16b and 17b with outstanding results. The cyclization of anilines containing enyne motifs, exemplified by 18a, facilitated the formation of desired product 18b. Furthermore, alkyl-substituted alkyne 19a produced the desired product 19b with slightly reduced enantioselectivity (84% ee). Furthermore, a detailed examination of indoles with various substituents at the C2 position revealed significant insights. Methyl, phenethyl, isopropyl, and cyclopropyl groups all led to a notable decrease in enantioselectivity (5–66% ee), highlighting the critical influence of steric effects on the enantioselectivity of this transformation (see Table S1 in Supporting Information). We delved further into the investigation of functional groups attached to the benzene nuclei of the synthesized indoles. Compounds adorned with electron-neutral and electron-donating substituents, exemplified by methyl (20b, 21b) and methoxy (22b, 23b), were generated with exemplary enantioselectivities. The compatibility of the benzene core in indoles bearing halide substituents, such as fluorine (24b, 25b), chlorine (26b), and bromine (27a, 28b), was confirmed under the reaction conditions. We also evaluated the reaction tolerance of trifluoromethyl (29b) and ester (30b) groups within the indole backbone. Interestingly, the naphthalen-2-amine-derived substrate 31a exhibited exceptional reactivity, resulting in the desired benzo­[f]­indole 31b with a yield of 73% and an enantioselectivity of 95% ee. However, 2-(phenylethynyl)­phenol and 2-(phenylethynyl)­benzenethiol failed to undergo the desired transformations to form benzofuran- and benzothiophene-based sulfinamides at the current reaction conditions (see Table S1 in Supporting Information).

2. Substrate Scope of ortho-Alkynylanilines for Construction of S-Stereogenic Center .

graphic file with name oc5c00909_0006.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: CuBr (10 mol %), L5 (12 mol %), 2–31a (0.1 mmol), sulfinylamine I (0.3 mmol), LiO t Bu (0.3 mmol) in 1,3-dioxolane (0.1 M) at 40 °C for 40 h under N2 atmosphere, isolated yield. Ee value by chiral HPLC.

To systematically evaluate the substrate scope for the simultaneous construction of S­(IV)-stereogenic centers and axial chirality, we explored the reaction of diverse ortho-alkynylanilines with sulfinylamine I under optimized conditions (Table ). The reaction accommodates a wide range of substituents across the aniline core and arylacetylene unit, delivering products with consistently high enantio- and diastereoselectivity. The benchmark substrate 32a, bearing an o-tolylethynyl group, afforded product 32b with exceptional enantioselectivity (99% ee) and high diastereoselectivity (12/1 dr). Electron-neutral and electron-donating substituents on the aniline ring, including methyl (33a35a) and methoxy (36a, 37a), proved highly effective, delivering the corresponding products 33b–37b with outstanding enantiocontrol and excellent diastereoselectivity. Halogenated substratesencompassing fluorine (38a, 39a), chlorine (40a, 41a), and bromine (42a)exhibited robust reactivity, furnishing 38b–42b in high yields with maintained stereoselectivity. This highlights the tolerance of the reaction to both electron-withdrawing and sterically unencumbered halogens. We next investigated the influence of substituents on the arylacetylene moiety. Substrates featuring additional methyl (43a, 44a), phenyl (45a), methoxy (46a), trifluoromethoxy (47a), fluorine (48a), or chlorine (49a) groups all underwent a smooth conversion to products 43b49b with exceptional stereoselectivity. Notably, the 2-fluorophenyl-substituted substrate 50a provided product 50b with moderate diastereoselectivity (1.5/1 dr), although both diastereomers retained high enantiopurity. Intriguingly, other halogens such as chlorine (51a), bromine (52a, 53a), and iodine (54a) restored excellent diastereocontrol, suggesting a nuanced steric influence on selectivity. The reaction scope was extended successfully to naphthalene-based substrates. Both 1-ethynylnaphthalene (55a–57a) and 2-ethynylnaphthalene (58a, 59a) derivatives were efficiently transformed into products 55b59b with high yields and stereoselectivity. Even the sterically congested 2-(phenanthren-9-ylethynyl)­aniline (60a) proved viable, yielding 60b with good efficiency (48% yield, 97% ee, 12/1 dr). A striking example was observed with naphthalen-2-amine-derived 61a, which exhibited remarkable reactivity to furnish atropisomeric benzo­[f]­indole 61b in 84% yield with 86% ee. This result underscores the versatility of the method in accessing complex heterocyclic architectures with high stereocontrol.

3. Substrate Scope of ortho-Alkynylanilines for Construction of Indole-Based S-Stereogenic Center and Axial Chirality .

graphic file with name oc5c00909_0007.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: CuBr (10 mol %), L5 (12 mol %), 32-61a (0.1 mmol), sulfinylamine I (0.3 mmol), LiO t Bu (0.3 mmol) in 1,3-dioxolane (0.1 M) at 40 °C for 40 h under N2 atmosphere, isolated yield. Dr value by 1H NMR and ee value by chiral HPLC.

b

At 40 °C for 3 days.

c

At 40 °C for 5 days.

d

At 25 °C for 40 h.

To demonstrate the broad applicability of this approach, a series of additional experiments were conducted (Scheme ). When ortho-alkynylaniline 1a and 52a were reacted with reagent I on a 1.0 mmol scale under optimized conditions, compounds 1b and 52b were obtained with impressive yields, retaining their high stereoselectivity (Scheme A). Anhydrous methanesulfonic acid proved to be an effective deprotecting agent, converting compound 1b and 52b into the primary sulfinamide 62 and 63 with acceptable yields while preserving the enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity. , Furthermore, the formed sulfinamide 1b served as a valuable precursor for the stereoselective synthesis of a variety of S-chiral compounds (Scheme B). For example, reacting compound 1b with trichloroisocyanuric acid led to the complete conversion into sulfonimidoyl chloride, which could then be efficiently transformed into sulfonimidamides 64 and 65 by reacting with 1-aminopropan and morpholine, respectively, with good enantioselectivity. , Using a similar procedure, the reaction of compound 1b with NaN3 yielded compound 66 with 60% yield and 90% ee. Sulfonimidoyl fluorides are valuable intermediates in chemical synthesis due to their potential to be further converted into other important compound classes through sulfur­(VI) fluoride exchange reactions, a form of click chemistry. Treating compound 1b with tetrabutylammonium fluoride resulted in the formation of chiral sulfonimidoyl fluoride 67, obtained with a satisfactory yield, though with a slight decrease in enantioselectivity. Meanwhile, compound 52b is a highly versatile precursor for the synthesis of various atropisomeric products, owing to the rich transformation potential of its aryl halide moieties (Scheme C). Through a sequence of halogen-magnesium exchange followed by nucleophilic substitution with allylic bromide and TsCN, compound 52b can be efficiently converted into allylation product 68 and cyanation product 69. These transformations proceed with modest yields while maintaining excellent enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity. Particularly noteworthy is the efficient chiral induction observed in the reaction of 52b with an aldehyde, which selectively affords stereoisomer 70 bearing three chiral elements with high stereocontrol. Additionally, the Sonogashira coupling of compound 54b with 1-ethynyl-4-methoxybenzene proceeds efficiently under palladium catalysis, affording product 71 in 67% isolated yield with excellent diastereoselectivity (>15:1 dr) and high enantiopurity (93% ee).

1. (A) Scale-up Synthesis of Sulfinamides 1b and 52b and Deprotection of the Trityl Group, (B) Follow-up Transformations of Sulfinamide 1b,(C) Downstream Transformations of Sulfinamides 52b and 54b .

1

Several experiments were conducted to elucidate the reaction pathway (Scheme ). Reactions employing stoichiometric CuBr and ligand L5 led to the formation of the complex [CuBr·L5] in good yield (Scheme A). Utilizing this complex as a catalyst in the reaction between substrates 1a and I produced results of comparable efficacy, strongly suggesting that [CuBr·L5] serves as the active catalytic species. The nonlinear effect of the reaction was also examined (Scheme B). A clear linear relationship was observed when compounds 1a and I were reacted using L5 as the chiral ligand, suggesting that the ratio of Cu and L5 is 1/1, without any self-aggregation of the catalyst. , When indole 72 was directly used in the system, no desired product 1b was obtained (Scheme C). This outcome suggests that the reaction does not proceed through the generation of free indole species. Instead, it indicates that the formation of the indolyl-Cu intermediate and the subsequent sulfinamidation step occur in a concerted manner. To further assess the likelihood of a radical-mediated mechanism, experiments were conducted with radical scavengers, including BHT and TEMPO (Scheme D). Our findings indicated that the synthesis of target compound 1b was not significantly affected, effectively ruling out radical processes in the reaction. We also investigated the impact of N-substituents in ortho-alkynylanilines on the cyclization reaction (Scheme E). Substrates with NH2 (1c), NHMe (1e), and NHBoc (1g) substituents failed to produce the desired products. Using substrate 1i with an NHMs substituent, we observed only trace amounts of product 1j. Finally, the influence of different N-substituents on the sulfinylamines was examined (Scheme F). Sulfinylamines with Ts (II) substituents did not lead to the desired products 32c. However, the use of sulfinylamine with phenyl (III) resulted in the product 32d with 1.2/1 dr and 62% ee (38% ee). Further, the use of sulfinylamine IV, containing a sterically hindered triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) group, led to an improvement in both diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity, affording product 32e in 62% yield with 2.6/1 dr and 96% ee (26% ee). These findings suggest that the choice of sulfinylamine I ageous for achieving high conversion and stereoselectivity.

2. (A) Synthesis of Copper Complex and Testing Its Catalytic Activity, (B) Nonlinear Effect, (C) Direct Sulfinamidation Using Indole 72, (D) Radical Quenching Experiments, (E) Testing Different N-Substituents in ortho-Alkynylanilines, (F) Testing Different N-Substituents in Sulfinylamines.

2

Based on the aforementioned mechanistic experiments, density functional theory (DFT) was then performed to elucidate the detailed reaction pathway (Figure ). The reaction begins with the coordination of Cu­(I) to the triple bond of substrate 32a, forming intermediate INT2A. In the presence of a base, INT2A undergoes deprotonation to generate dipolar intermediate INT3A, which is characterized by a positive charge concentrated on the copper atom and a negative charge localized on the nitrogen atom. Subsequently, the nitrogen-negative center of INT3A performs a nucleophilic attack on the triple bond to generate the indole skeleton. , Influenced by the chiral ligand, rotation of the aryl ring connected to the alkynyl group in the substrate is hindered, leading to the generation of axial chirality. In the unfavorable transition state TS4A-aS, the H···H distance between the methyl moiety of the substrate and the cyclopentadienyl ring skeleton of the chiral ligand is 2.19 Å. A notable steric repulsion exists in this configuration, thereby elevating the energy barrier associated with TS4A-aS. The calculation results indicate that the energy barrier of the five-membered-ring transition state TS4A-aR amounts to 17.1 kcal/mol relative to the zero-point energy. In comparison with the same reaction process proceeding through TS4A-aS, the energy barrier is diminished by 1.8 kcal/mol. This difference in energy bestows a distinct kinetic advantage, consequently determining the aR-configuration that is ultimately observable. The S-chiral center within the product is determined by the selective migratory insertion of the SO bond of reagent I into INT4A-aR. The migratory insertion through transition state TS5A-aR-S is kinetically more favorable, with its energy being 2.0 kcal/mol lower than that of the pathway formed through transition state TS5A-aR-R (15.8 vs 17.8 kcal/mol), which aligns closely with the 99% ee observed in our experimental results. Subsequent investigation utilized the Independent Gradient Model (IGMH) based on Hirshfeld partitioning to analyze the noncovalent interactions between the substrate and chiral ligand fragments within the transition states TS5A-aR-S and TS5A-aR-R. Structural analysis reveals that in the transition state TS5A-aR-S, a wider green surface exists between the Tr group of sulfinylamine I and the aromatic ring of the chiral ligand. This phenomenon suggests the existence of strong dispersive interactions in the favorable transition state TS5A-aR-S. These dispersive forces play a crucial role in stabilizing the structure, leading to an activation energy barrier that is 2.0 kcal/mol lower than that of transition state TS5A-aR-R. The originally reported selective migratory insertion of the SN bond is effectively excluded due to the significant steric space between the chiral ligand and the Tr group (see Supporting Information for details). Finally, transmetalation with an in situ generated Li complex forms the precursor for the S-configured product and regenerates active catalyst INT1A, completing the catalytic cycle.

2.

2

DFT-computed reaction pathways for the reaction of substrates 32a and I (M06/6-311+G­(d,p)-SDD­(Cu and Fe), IEFPCM­(1,3-dioxolane)//B3LYP-D3BJ/6-31G­(d)-SDD­(Cu and Fe)).

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a reliable strategy for cyclizative sulfinamidation, enabling the synthesis of chiral indole-3-sulfinamides with stereogenic sulfur­(IV) centers and atropisomeric chirality from ortho-alkynylanilines and sulfinylamines using a chiral copper catalyst. The resulting compounds serve as versatile intermediates, facilitating the creation of a wide array of sulfur-containing pharmacophores through highly stereoselective conversion. This method expands the toolkit for synthesizing complex S-containing compounds, which is expected to benefit pharmaceutical and materials science.

Supplementary Material

oc5c00909_si_001.pdf (25.8MB, pdf)
oc5c00909_si_002.zip (845.3KB, zip)
oc5c00909_si_003.pdf (95KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the High-Performance Computing Center of Nanjing University for performing the numerical calculations in this paper on its blade cluster system.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.5c00909.

  • Experimental procedures, characterizations, and analytical data of new compounds, and NMR and HPLC spectra for new compounds (PDF)

  • Cif files of 1b, 32b, and 55b.(ZIP)

  • Transparent Peer Review report available (PDF)

CCDC: 2419186 (1b), 2436916 (32b), and 2436917 (55b) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: + 44 1223 336033.

#.

Xiaowu Fanga and Fengrui Xiang contributed equally to this work.

We would like to acknowledge the financial support from National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA1503200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 92361201, 22025104, and 22171134), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant BK20240059, BK20220033), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant 020514380326) for their financial support.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Raghunathan E., Kumarasamy R., Sibi M. K., Sivaguru J.. Nonbiaryl and Heterobiaryl Atropisomers: Molecular Templates with Promise for Atropselective Chemical Transformations. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:11239–11300. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LaPlante S. R., Edwards P. J., Fader L. D., Jakalian A., Hucke O.. Revealing Atropisomer Axial Chirality in Drug Discovery. ChemMedChem. 2011;6:505–513. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201000485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wencel-Delord J., Panossian A., Leroux F. R., Colobert F.. Recent Advances and New Concepts for the Synthesis of Axially Stereoenriched Biaryls. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:3418–3430. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00012B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Loxq P., Manoury E., Poli R., Deydier E., Labande A.. Synthesis of Axially Chiral Biaryl Compounds by Asymmetric Catalytic Reactions with Transition Metals. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016;308:131–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng J. K., Xiang S.-H., Li S., Ye L., Tan B.. Recent Advances in Catalytic Asymmetric Construction of Atropisomers. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:4805–4902. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Xiang S.-H., Ding W.-Y., Wang Y.-B., Tan B.. Catalytic Atroposelective Synthesis. Nat. Catal. 2024;7:483–498. doi: 10.1038/s41929-024-01138-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shen X., Jones G. O., Watson D., Bhayana A. B., Buchwald S. L.. Enantioselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Biaryls by the Pd-Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Reaction: Substrate Scope and Quantum Mechanical Investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:11278–11287. doi: 10.1021/ja104297g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu G., Fu W., Liu G., Senanayake C. H., Tang W.. Efficient Syntheses of Korupensamines A, B and Michellamine B by Asymmetric Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:570–573. doi: 10.1021/ja409669r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lotter D., Castrogiovanni A., Neuburger M., Sparr C.. Catalyst-Controlled Stereodivergent Synthesis of Atropisomeric Multiaxis Systems. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018;4:656–660. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Y.-B., Yu P., Zhou Z.-P., Zhang J., Wang J. Joelle, Luo S.-H., Gu Q.-S., Houk K. N., Tan B.. Rational Design, Enantioselective Synthesis and Catalytic Applications of Axially Chiral EBINOLs. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:504–513. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0278-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang H., Sun J., Gu W., Tang W.. Enantioselective Cross-Coupling for Axially Chiral Tetra-ortho-Substituted Biaryls and Asymmetric Synthesis of Gossypol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:8036–8043. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mei G.-J., Koay W. L., Guan C.-Y., Lu Y.. Atropisomers beyond the C–C Axial Chirality: Advances in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. Chem. 2022;8:1855–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pearce-Higgins R., Hogenhout L. N., Docherty P. J., Whalley D. M., Chuentragool P., Lee N., Lam N. Y. S., McGuire T. M., Valette D., Phipps R. J.. An Enantioselective Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling to Form Axially Chiral Biphenols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:15026–15032. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c06529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang X., Xiong W., Deng S., Lu F.-D., Jia Y., Yang Q., Xue L.-Y., Qi X., Tunge J. A., Lu L.-Q., Xiao W.-J.. Construction of Axial Chirality via Asymmetric Radical Trapping by Cobalt under Visible Light. Nat. Catal. 2022;5:788–797. doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00831-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang K., Wang W., Lou D., Zhang J., Chi C., Bäckvall J.-E., Sheng X., Zhu C.. Overcoming the Limitations of Transition-Metal Catalysis in the Chemoenzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Resolution (DKR) of Atropisomeric Bisnaphthols. ACS Cent. Sci. 2024;10:2099–2110. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.4c01370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pradhan C., Punji B.. Atroposelective Construction of Biaryls Enabled by a Ni­(II)-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidation Strategy. ACS Cent. Sci. 2025;11:187–189. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5c00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li Y.-N., Yang Y., Zheng L., Ding W.-Y., Xiang S.-H., Chung L. W., Tan B.. Nickel­(II) Catalyzed Atroposelective Aerobic Oxidative Aryl–Aryl Cross-Coupling. ACS Cent. Sci. 2025;11:248–260. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.4c01501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Norton R. S., Wells R. J.. A Series of Chiral Polybrominated Biindoles from the Marine Blue-Green Alga Rivularia Firma. Application of Carbon-13 NMR Spin-Lattice Relaxation Data and Carbon-13-Proton Coupling Constants to Structure Elucidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:3628–3635. doi: 10.1021/ja00377a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ito C., Thoyama Y., Omura M., Kajiura I., Furukawa H.. Alkaloidal Constituents of Murraya koenigii. Isolation and Structural Elucidation of Novel Binary Carbazolequinones and Carbazole Alkaloids. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993;41:2096–2100. doi: 10.1248/cpb.41.2096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shoeb M., Celik S., Jaspars M., Kumarasamy Y., MacManus S. M., Nahar L., Thoo-Lin P. K., Sarker S. D.. Isolation, Structure Elucidation and Bioactivity of Schischkiniin, a Unique Indole Alkaloid from the Seeds of Centaurea Schischkinii. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:9001–9006. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.07.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Xia W., An Q.-J., Xiang S.-H., Li S., Wang Y.-B., Tan B.. Chiral Phosphoric Acid Catalyzed Atroposelective C–H Amination of Arenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:6775–6779. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. He T., Peng L., Li S., Hu F., Xie C., Huang S., Jia S., Qin W., Yan H.. Chiral Naphthyl-C2-Indole as Scaffold for Phosphine Organocatalysis: Application in Asymmetric Formal [4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions. Org. Lett. 2020;22:6966–6971. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang H.-H., Shi F.. Organocatalytic Atroposelective Synthesis of Indole Derivatives Bearing Axial Chirality: Strategies and Application. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:2562–2580. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang H.-H., Wang C.-S., Li C., Mei G.-J., Li Y., Shi F.. Design and Enantioselective Construction of Axially Chiral Naphthyl-Indole Skeletons. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:116–121. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Qi L.-W., Mao J.-H., Zhang J., Tan B.. Organocatalytic Asymmetric Arylation of Indoles Enabled by Azo Groups. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:58–64. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang F., Chen K.-W., Wu P., Zhang Y.-C., Jiao Y., Shi F.. A Strategy for Synthesizing Axially Chiral Naphthyl-Indoles: Catalytic Asymmetric Addition Reactions of Racemic Substrates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:15104–15110. doi: 10.1002/anie.201908279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun L., Chen H., Liu B., Chang J., Kong L., Wang F., Lan Y., Li X.. Rhodium-Catalyzed Atroposelective Construction of Indoles via C–H Bond Activation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:8391–8395. doi: 10.1002/anie.202012932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang P., Xu Q., Wang X., Feng J., Lu C.-J., Li Y., Liu R.-R.. Enantioselective Synthesis of N–N Bisindole Atropisomers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202212101. doi: 10.1002/anie.202212101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Surgenor R. R., Liu X., Keenlyside M. J. H., Myers W., Smith M. D.. Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomeric Indoles via Iron-Catalysed Oxidative Cross-Coupling. Nat. Chem. 2023;15:357–365. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-01095-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang S.-J., Wang X., Xin X., Zhang S., Yang H., Wong M. W., Lu S.. Organocatalytic Diastereo- and Atroposelective Construction of N–N Axially Chiral Pyrroles and Indoles. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:518. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44743-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dai L., Sun Y., Guo J., Zhou X., Huang Q., Lu Y.. Atroposelective Synthesis of 3-Aryl-Indoles Through a One-Pot 2, 3-Difunctionalization of Simple Indoles. CCS Chem. 2024;6:1672–1680. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.023.202303434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang J., Pan D., Wang F., Yu S., Huang G., Li X.. Pd-Catalyzed Asymmetric Larock Reaction for the Atroposelective Synthesis of N-N Chiral Indoles. Sci. Adv. 2024;10:eado4489. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado4489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ototake N., Morimoto Y., Mokuya A., Fukaya H., Shida Y., Kitagawa O.. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomeric Indoles with an N-C Chiral Axis. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:6752–6755. doi: 10.1002/chem.201000243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tian M., Bai D., Zheng G., Chang J., Li X.. Rh­(III)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Synthesis of Axially Chiral Biindolyls by Merging C–H Activation and Nucleophilic Cyclization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:9527–9532. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. He Y.-P., Wu H., Wang Q., Zhu J.. Palladium-Catalyzed Enantioselective Cacchi Reaction: Asymmetric Synthesis of Axially Chiral 2, 3-Disubstituted Indoles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:2105–2109. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Peng L., Li K., Xie C., Li S., Xu D., Qin W., Yan H.. Organocatalytic Asymmetric Annulation of ortho-Alkynylanilines: Synthesis of Axially Chiral Naphthyl-C2-Indoles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:17199–17204. doi: 10.1002/anie.201908961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Feng M., Tang B., Liang S. H., Jiang X.. Sulfur Containing Scaffolds in Drugs: Synthesis and Application in Medicinal Chemistry. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016;16:1200–1216. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150915111741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Petkowski J. J., Bains W., Seager S.. Natural Products Containing a Nitrogen–Sulfur Bond. J. Nat. Prod. 2018;81:423–446. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Scott K. A., Njardarson J. T.. Photo- and Electrochemical Valorization of Carbon Dioxide Using Earth-Abundant Molecular Catalysts. Top. Curr. Chem. 2018;376:1–25. doi: 10.1007/s41061-018-0184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wan Y., Li Y., Yan C., Yan M., Tang Z.. Indole: A Privileged Scaffold for the Design of Anti-Cancer Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2019;183:111691. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Laurent Q., Martinent R., Lim B., Pham A. T., Kato T., Lopez-Andarias J., Sakai N., Matile S.. Thiol-Mediated Uptake. JACS Au. 2021;1:710–728. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mustafa M., Winum J. Y.. The Importance of Sulfur-Containing Motifs in Drug Design and Discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery. 2022;17:501–512. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2022.2044783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor R. D., MacCoss M., Lawson A. D. G.. Rings in Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:5845–5859. doi: 10.1021/jm4017625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vijayasaradhi S., Muralikrishna V., Srinivas R., Rao C. P. K., Prasad K. Y., Prasad B., Khanna B.. One-Pot Lewis Acid Assisted Synthesis of Indole-3-Sulfonamide and Imidazo­[1,2-A]­Pyridine-3-Sulfonamide Using Burgess Reagent in a Microwave Reactor. Results in Chem. 2023;5:100754. doi: 10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lücking U.. Neglected Sulfur­(VI) Pharmacophores in Drug Discovery: Exploration of Novel Chemical Space by the Interplay of Drug Design and Method Development. Org. Chem. Front. 2019;6:1319–1324. doi: 10.1039/C8QO01233D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tilby M. J., Willis M. C.. How Do We Address Neglected Sulfur Pharmacophores in Drug Discovery? Expert Opin. Drug Discovery. 2021;16:1227–1231. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1948008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Johnson C. R.. Utilization of Sulfoximines and Derivatives as Reagents for Organic Synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 1973;6:341–347. doi: 10.1021/ar50070a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dunbar K. L., Scharf D. H., Litomska A., Hertweck C.. Enzymatic Carbon–Sulfur Bond Formation in Natural Product Biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:5521–5577. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kaiser D., Klose I., Oost R., Neuhaus J., Maulide N.. Bond-Forming and -Breaking Reactions at Sulfur­(IV): Sulfoxides, Sulfonium Salts, Sulfur Ylides, and Sulfinate Salts. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:8701–8780. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wojaczyńska E., Wojaczyński J.. Modern Stereoselective Synthesis of Chiral Sulfinyl Compounds. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:4578–4611. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lou T. S.-B., Willis M. C.. Sulfonyl Fluorides as Targets and Substrates in the Development of New Synthetic Methods. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2022;6:146–162. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00352-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang X., Wang F., Tan C.-H.. Asymmetric Synthesis of S­(IV) and S­(VI) Stereogenic Centers. JACS Au. 2023;3:700–714. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shibata N., Matsunaga M., Nakagawa M., Fukuzumi T., Nakamura S., Toru T.. Cinchona Alkaloid/Sulfinyl Chloride Combinations: Enantioselective Sulfinylating Agents of Alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:1374–1375. doi: 10.1021/ja0430189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jia T., Zhang M., McCollom S. P., Bellomo A., Montel S., Mao J., Dreher S. D., Welch C. J., Regalado E. L., Williamson R. T., Manor B. C., Tomson N. C., Walsh P. J.. Palladium-Catalyzed Enantioselective Arylation of Aryl Sulfenate Anions: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:8337–8345. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Bayeh L., Le P. Q., Tambar U. K.. Catalytic Allylic Oxidation of Internal Alkenes to a Multifunctional Chiral Building Block. Nature. 2017;547:196–200. doi: 10.1038/nature22805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ma L., Chen S., Li G., Zhu J., Wang Q., Tang Z.. Chiral Bro̷nsted-Acid-Catalyzed Asymmetric Oxidation of Sulfenamide by Using H2O2: A Versatile Access to Sulfinamide and Sulfoxide with High Enantioselectivity. ACS Catal. 2019;9:1525–1530. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhou T., Qian P.-F., Li J.-Y., Zhou Y.-B., Li H.-C., Chen H.-Y., Shi B.-F.. Efficient Synthesis of Sulfur-Stereogenic Sulfoximines via Ru­(II)-Catalyzed Enantioselective C–H Functionalization Enabled by Chiral Carboxylic Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:6810–6816. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tilby M. J., Dewez D. F., Hall A., Martinez Lamenca C., Willis M. C.. Exploiting Configurational Lability in Aza-Sulfur Compounds for the Organocatalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Sulfonimidamides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:25680–25687. doi: 10.1002/anie.202109160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang X., Ang E. C. X., Yang Z., Kee C. W., Tan C.-H.. Synthesis of Chiral Sulfinate Esters by Asymmetric Condensation. Nature. 2022;604:298–303. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04524-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yuan Y., Han Y., Zhang Z., Sun S., Wu K., Yang J., Zhang J.. Enantioselective Arylation of Sulfenamides to Access Sulfilimines Enabled by Palladium Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202409541. doi: 10.1002/anie.202409541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Liang Q., Zhang X., Rotella M. E., Xu Z., Kozlowski M. C., Jia T.. Enantioselective Chan–Lam S-Arylation of Sulfenamides. Nat. Catal. 2024;7:1010–1020. doi: 10.1038/s41929-024-01213-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Boyer Z. W., Kwon N. Y., Ellman J. A.. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Enantioselective Alkylation of Sulfenamides: A General Approach for the Synthesis of Drug Relevant S-Methyl and S-Cyclopropyl Sulfoximines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:14954–14959. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c03841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Davies T. Q., Hall A., Willis M. C.. One-Pot, Three-Component Sulfonimidamide Synthesis Exploiting the Sulfinylamine Reagent N-Sulfinyltritylamine. TrNSO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:14937–14941. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lo P. K. T., Willis M. C.. Nickel­(II)-Catalyzed Addition of Aryl and Heteroaryl Boroxines to the Sulfinylamine Reagent TrNSO: The Catalytic Synthesis of Sulfinamides, Sulfonimidamides, and Primary Sulfonamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:15576–15581. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c08052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ding M., Zhang Z.-X., Davies T. Q., Willis M. C.. A Silyl Sulfinylamine Reagent Enables the Modular Synthesis of Sulfonimidamides via Primary Sulfinamides. Org. Lett. 2022;24:1711–1715. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c00347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wei M.-K., Moseley D., Bär R., Sempere Y., Willis M. C.. Palladium-Catalyzed Addition of Aryl Halides to N-Sulfinylamines for the Synthesis of Sulfinamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:19690–19695. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c06726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Aota Y., Kano T., Maruoka K.. Asymmetric Synthesis of Chiral Sulfoximines via the S-Arylation of Sulfinamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:19263–19268. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zou X., Wang H., Gao B.. Synthesis of Sulfoximines by Copper-Catalyzed Oxidative Coupling of Sulfinamides and Aryl Boronic Acids. Org. Lett. 2023;25:7656–7660. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c02970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tsuzuki S., Kano T.. Asymmetric Synthesis of Chiral Sulfimides through the O-Alkylation of Enantioenriched Sulfinamides and Addition of Carbon Nucleophiles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202300637. doi: 10.1002/anie.202300637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Noten E. A., Ng C. H., Wolesensky R. M., Stephenson C. R. J.. A General Alkene Aminoarylation Enabled by N-Centred Radical Reactivity of Sulfinamides. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:599–606. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01404-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hervieu C., Kirillova M. S., Hu Y., Cuesta-Galisteo S., Merino E., Nevado C.. Chiral Arylsulfinylamides as Reagents for Visible Light-Mediated Asymmetric Alkene Aminoarylations. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:607–614. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01414-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wei T., Wang H.-L., Tian Y., Xie M.-S., Guo H.-M.. Enantioselective Construction of Stereogenic-At-Sulfur­(IV) Centres via Catalytic Acyl Transfer Sulfinylation. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:1301–1311. doi: 10.1038/s41557-024-01522-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Liao M., Liu Y., Long H., Xiong Q., Lv X., Luo Z., Wu X., Chi Y. R.. Enantioselective Sulfinylation of Alcohols and Amines by Condensation with Sulfinates. Chem. 2024;10:1541–1552. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2024.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Jiang H.-J., Fang W., Chen X., Yu X.-R., Meng Y.-D., Fang L.-P., Shen M.-L., Yao C.-Z., Li Q., Hong X., Yu J.. Unlocking Chiral Sulfinimidoyl Electrophiles: Asymmetric Synthesis of Sulfinamides Catalyzed by Anionic Stereogenic-at-Cobalt­(III) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:2137–2147. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c16233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Shi Y., Yuan Y., Li J., Yang J., Zhang J.. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Sulfinamides via Cu-Catalyzed Asymmetric Addition of Aryl Boroxines to Sulfinylamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:17580–17586. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c03473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Xi L., Fang X., Wang M., Shi Z.. Asymmetric 2, 3-Addition of Sulfinylamines with Arylboronic Acids Enabled by Nickel Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:17587–17594. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c04050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Fang X., Xi L., Wang M., Xiao J., Zhao Y., Willis M. C., Shi Z.. Asymmetric Reductive Arylation and Alkenylation to Access S-Chirogenic Sulfinamides. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:2547. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57471-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Yuan Y., Tian X., Zheng H., Li Y., Zhang J., Yang J.. Catalytic Enantioselective Reductive Arylation and Alkenylation of Sulfinylamines to Access Sulfinamides Enabled by Cobalt Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202506243. doi: 10.1002/anie.202506243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wu F., Zhang Y., Zhu R., Huang Y.. Discovery and Synthesis of Atropisomerically Chiral Acyl-Substituted Stable Vinyl Sulfoxonium Ylides. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:132–139. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01358-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Hiroya K., Itoh S., Sakamoto T.. Development of an Efficient Procedure for Indole Ring Synthesis from 2-Ethynylaniline Derivatives Catalyzed by Cu­(II) Salts and Its Application to Natural Product Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:1126–1136. doi: 10.1021/jo035528b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ohno H., Ohta Y., Oishi S., Fujii N.. Direct Synthesis of 2-(Aminomethyl)­indoles through Copper­(I)-Catalyzed Domino Three-Component Coupling and Cyclization Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:2295–2298. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shen Z., Lu X.. Cupric Halide-Mediated Intramolecular Halocyclization of N-Electron-Withdrawing Group-Substituted 2-Alkynylanilines for the Synthesis of 3-Haloindoles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009;351:3107–3112. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200900609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Andrews J. A., Kalepu J., Palmer C. F., Poole D. L., Christensen K. E., Willis M. C.. Photocatalytic Carboxylate to Sulfinamide Switching Delivers a Divergent Synthesis of Sulfonamides and Sulfonimidamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:21623–21629. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c07974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Yang G.-F., Yuan Y., Tian Y., Zhang S.-Q., Cui X., Xia B., Li G.-X., Tang Z.. Synthesis of Chiral Sulfonimidoyl Chloride via Desymmetrizing Enantioselective Hydrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:5439–5446. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c13758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zeng D., Ma Y., Deng W.-P., Wang M., Jiang X.. Divergent Sulfur­(VI) Fluoride Exchange Linkage of Sulfonimidoyl Fluorides and Alkynes. Nat. Synth. 2022;1:455–463. doi: 10.1038/s44160-022-00060-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Peng Z., Sun S., Zheng M.-M., Li Y., Li X., Li S., Xue X.-S., Dong J., Gao B.. Enantioselective Sulfur­(VI) Fluoride Exchange Reaction of Iminosulfur Oxydifluorides. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:353–362. doi: 10.1038/s41557-024-01452-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Teng S., Shultz Z. P., Shan C., Wojtas L., Lopchuk J. M.. Asymmetric Synthesis of Sulfoximines, Sulfonimidoyl Fluorides and Sulfonimidamides Enabled by an Enantiopure Bifunctional S­(VI) Reagent. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:183–192. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01419-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Harutyunyan S. R., López F., Browne W. R., Correa A., Peña D., Badorrey R., Meetsma A., Minnaard A. J., Feringa B. L.. On the Mechanism of the Copper-Catalyzed Enantioselective 1, 4-Addition of Grignard Reagents to α, β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9103–9118. doi: 10.1021/ja0585634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Guillaneux D., Zhao S.-H., Samuel O., Rainford D., Kagan H. B.. Nonlinear Effects in Asymmetric Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:9430–9439. doi: 10.1021/ja00100a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Girard C., Kagan H. B.. Nonlinear Effects in Asymmetric Synthesis and Stereoselective Reactions: Ten Years of Investigation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998;37:2922–2959. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981116)37:21&#x0003c;2922::AID-ANIE2922&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang B.-C., Hu F., Bai J., Xiong F.-Y., Chen P., Li J., Tan Y., Guo Y.-L., Xiao W.-J., Lu L.-Q.. Synthesis of S­(IV)-Stereogenic Chiral Thio-Oxazolidinones via Palladium-Catalyzed Asymmetric [3 + 2] Annulations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202319728. doi: 10.1002/anie.202319728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Chen J., Han X., Lu X.. Enantioselective Synthesis of Tetrahydropyrano­[3,4-b]­indoles: Palladium­(II)-Catalyzed Aminopalladation/1, 4-Addition Sequence. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:14698–14701. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Lu T., Chen Q.. Independent Gradient Model Based on Hirshfeld Partition: A New Method for Visual Study of Interactions in Chemical Systems. J. Comput. Chem. 2022;43:539–555. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oc5c00909_si_001.pdf (25.8MB, pdf)
oc5c00909_si_002.zip (845.3KB, zip)
oc5c00909_si_003.pdf (95KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Central Science are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES