Abstract
Dislocations have increasingly become important for improving the thermoelectric properties of thermoelectric materials due to their more pronounced scattering effect on phonons than on carriers. This study combined the introduction of the dislocation cores through domain engineering with the generation of Mg vacancies (VMg) by controlling point defects to achieve low lattice thermal conductivity and high power factor in n‐type and p‐type Mg2Sn single crystals (SCs). The VMg domain with ordered atomic arrangements allowed carrier transport with minimal scattering, while the high dislocation density at the interface effectively scattered phonons, thereby decoupling carrier‐phonon transport. This resulted in obtaining the peak zT values of 0.83(8) and 0.42(4) for n‐type and p‐type Mg2Sn SCs, respectively. The outstanding combination of domain engineering and point defect control techniques could be a strategy for developing high‐performance thermoelectric materials.
Keywords: dislocations, nanoprecipitates, single crystals, thermoelectric materials, vacancies
This study proposed domain engineering and point‐defect control for developing high‐performance thermoelectric materials. Mg vacancies and dislocations introduced into Mg2Sn single crystals enhanced thermoelectric performance through decoupling carrier‐phonon transport. The Mg vacancies formed nanoparticle‐like regions, of which the size and density were controlled. Consequently, a higher performance than polycrystalline samples was achieved for both n‐type and p‐type Mg2Sn.

1. Introduction
Thermoelectricity presents a promising solution to the challenges posed by energy scarcity and environmental concerns since it can directly convert heat into electricity without generating supplementary emissions.[ 1 ] The advancement of this field depends on enhancing the thermoelectric properties of materials. Particularly, the dimensionless figure of merit, zT, needs to be improved, defined as zT = S 2 σT/(κ ele+κ bip+κ lat), where S, σ, T, κ ele, κ bip, and κ lat represent the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, absolute temperature, electrical thermal conductivity, bipolar thermal conductivity, and lattice thermal conductivity, respectively. The pursuit of enhancing zT is a paramount objective in promoting the development of thermoelectric technology. Consequently, thermoelectric materials require a high power factor (PF = S 2 σ) accompanied by low thermal conductivity (κ tot = κ ele+κ bip+κ lat) to realize their full potential.
It has been well established that carrier concentration (n H) substantially dominates material properties: S, σ, and κ ele. Decoupling these parameters to enhance the PF through band engineering has been successful in many thermoelectric materials. On the other hand, the preparation of single crystals (SCs) to eliminate carrier grain boundary scattering has also been of increasing interest. Alternatively, κ lat is the sole independent parameter that determines zT. Another crucial tactic for increasing zT involves minimizing κ lat.[ 2 ] The insertion of 0D point defects (PDs)[ 3 ] and 2D interfaces[ 4 ] are widely used to further scatter phonons, thereby effectively reducing κ lat. Recently, it has been demonstrated that 1D dislocations efficiently decrease κ lat. Dense dislocations have been created either at grain boundaries through liquid‐phase sintering[ 5 ] and alloying or within grains through the clustering of vacancies[ 6 ] or interstitials.[ 7 ]
When aliovalent PDs are introduced into a material, they are often perceived as contributing carriers rather than introducing charged vacancies. However, these defects also reduce the formation energy of vacancies and may even stabilize dislocations in their vicinity. For instance, in aliovalent Na‐doped PbTe[ 8 ] and Na‐doped EuMg2Sb2,[ 9 ] a low doping level (<5%) leads to an unusual increase in dislocations. This phenomenon can be attributed to the electrostatic interaction of heterovalent PDs with charged dislocations, which serves to stabilize them. Nevertheless, this argument remains open to further investigation in the field.
Mg2Sn has garnered considerable attention as a promising medium‐temperature thermoelectric material. It is characterized by compositions comprising abundant, inexpensive, and nontoxic elements.[ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] Efforts have been directed toward decreasing κ lat through grain size reduction,[ 19 , 20 ] alloying,[ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] and introducing particles[ 25 ] in polycrystals (PCs). Peak zT values (zT peak) reported so far were 0.62 for n‐type (Sb 1% doping[ 13 ]) and 0.3 for p‐type (Ag 0.5% doping[ 25 ] and Li 2% doping[ 26 ]). Recently, we successfully synthesized undoped and elementary‐doped Mg2Sn SCs through the melting method.[ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ] These SCs contained Mg vacancies (VMg) and dislocation cores (DCs), achieving a low κ lat. For example, the κ lat of the undoped Mg2Sn SC (≈4.3 W m−1 K−1 @ 300 K[ 27 ]) was lower than that of undoped SCs reported in previous studies (≈7.3 W m−1 K−1 @ 300 K[ 32 , 33 ]). In addition, the Sb‐ and Li‐doped Mg2Sn SCs exhibited a lower κ lat than the corresponding PCs.[ 28 , 31 ] Furthermore, exceptionally high crystallinity of the prepared SCs realized superior carrier mobility (µ H) compared to the corresponding PCs at equivalent n H, leading to enhanced PF and zT.[ 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 ] The zT peak values exceeded that of PCs, reaching 0.72 for n‐type (Sb 1% doping[ 28 ]) and 0.38 for p‐type (Li 2% doping[ 31 ]).
In this study, we aimed to further enhance thermoelectric properties through decoupling carrier‐phonon transport by additional boron (B) doping to the Sb‐doped and Li‐doped Mg2Sn SCs. The B single‐doping significantly decreased the κ lat of the Mg2Sn SC down to a minimum κ lat (κ min ≈0.65 W m−1 K−1,[ 34 ] approximated through the Debye model) due to the increase in VMg and DCs.[ 29 ] We meticulously prepared (Sb, B)‐doped Mg2Sn SCs (Mg2‐ x B x Sn0.99Sb0.01 with x = 0.0025 and 0.005, denoted as (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Sb 1%, B 0.5%)‐doped SCs). Moreover, we prepared (Li, B)‐doped Mg2Sn SCs (Mg1.98‐ x Li0.02B x Sn with x = 0.0025 and 0.005, denoted as (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.5%)‐doped SCs). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the emergence of various lattice defects in both the n‐type and p‐type Mg2Sn SCs (Figure 1a). These defects have a more substantial scattering effect on phonons than on carriers. This leads to a more significant reduction of κ lat than PF decay, ultimately improving the zT values. We conducted comprehensive investigations into their thermal and electrical transport properties to gain further insights into the implications of lattice defects in SCs. By simulating κ lat using the Debye model, we discerned the contribution of lattice defects to the decrease in κ lat. Eventually, we achieved noteworthy outcomes: (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs exhibited a remarkable decrease in κ lat, yielding peak zT values of ≈0.83(8) and ≈0.42(4), respectively. Compared with n‐type and p‐type Mg2Sn PCs, both the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs exhibited the highest zT values (Figure 1b). This research significantly deepens our comprehension of the intricate mechanisms governing lattice defects. Consequently, our findings hold great potential in providing a guiding framework to understand the underpinnings of lattice defects in Mg2 X (X = Si, Ge, Sn) and other thermoelectric materials.
Figure 1.

a) Schematic illustration of lattice defects in Mg2Sn single crystals (SCs) and b) comparison of peak zT values between this study and Mg2Sn from the literature.[ 13 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Crystal Structure
Laue X‐ray diffraction (XRD) was employed to assess the crystallinity of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped ingots. Figure S1a–d (Supporting Information) displays the Laue spots, which exhibited only one clear set of alignments. This alignment was consistent with the simulated spots of the cubic structure (Fm m) of Mg2Sn (Figure S1e, Supporting Information). The bulk XRD patterns of the fractured surface of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped ingots showed 111, 222, and 333 planes (Figure S1f, Supporting Information). The Laue and bulk XRD results verified that all the prepared (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped ingots were SCs. The phases of the (Sb, B)‐doped and (Li, B)‐doped SCs were analyzed using powder XRD, as depicted in Figure 2a. Similar XRD peaks were evident in all SCs, and they can be assigned to Mg2Sn with the Fm m structure, indicating the formation of single‐phase Mg2Sn SCs.
Figure 2.

a) Powder XRD patterns, b) lattice constant, and c) fraction of Mg vacancies (VMg) of (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs. d) VMg fraction versus lattice constant. The error bars for the lattice constant and VMg fraction represent standard deviation (SD), n = 3.
We used SC XRD patterns and refined the structural parameters to further analyze the crystal structure and gain crystal information about the SCs (see Table S1, Supporting Information for details). The results showed the presence of Mg vacancies and the absence of Sn vacancies, which is consistent with the results for Mg2Sn SCs[ 27 ] and PCs.[ 15 ] It also corroborates the calculations of Liu et al.[ 40 ] that defects on the Sn sites have high formation energy in both n‐type and p‐type Mg2Sn, which are unlikely to occur during the crystal growth. Figure 2b shows that the lattice constant (a) of the SCs decreased after doping B. Specifically, it decreased from 6.7697(11) to 6.7634(8) Å for (Sb, B)‐doped SCs and from 6.7647(5) to 6.7628(6) Å for (Li, B)‐doped SCs. Considering neutron holography results that B dopant substituted for the Mg site of the Mg2Sn SC,[ 29 ] the smaller atomic radius of B (79.5 pm)[ 41 ] compared to Mg (159.9 pm)[ 41 ] might be the probable reason for this alteration. In fact, neutron holography measurements on (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs proved that the B atom was located at the Mg site.[ 42 ] The decrease in the lattice constant was more significant in the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs than in the (Li, B)‐doped SCs, which can be attributed to two reasons: 1) Sb dopant tended to cause lattice expansion, whereas Li and B dopants contributed to lattice contraction, leading to a more pronounced impact of the B dopant on the lattice of the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs; 2) While the Sb dopant entered the Sn site, Li and B dopants were incorporated into the Mg site, which may also result in different effects of the B dopant. Interestingly, we observed that the VMg fraction increased as the B dopant amount increased (Figure 2c). The VMg fraction increased from 8.9(17)% to 12.3(47)% for (Sb, B)‐doped SCs and increased from 10(2)% to 12(2)% for (Li, B)‐doped SCs. This result can be attributed to the change in the lattice constant, which exerted an augmenting chemical pressure on the Mg2Sn lattice.[ 29 ] Figure 2d summarizes a strong correlation between VMg and the lattice constant. As the lattice constant decreased, the VMg amount increased, suggesting that the increase in chemical pressure contributed to the rise in VMg.
2.2. Nanostructure
TEM was employed to observe the nanostructures of the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐, (Sb 1%, B 0.5%)‐, (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐, and (Li 2%, B 0.5%)‐doped SCs (Figure 3a,b; Figure S3a,b, Supporting Information, respectively). In Figure 3a,b, the striped patterns (R2 region), the so‐called Moiré pattern, were distributed in the matrix (R1 region). The R1 region in the high‐magnification TEM images (Figure 3a2[left] and 3b2[left]) exhibited a perfect atomic arrangement of the (111) and (110) surfaces, respectively, representing the SC region. Conversely, the R2 region in high‐magnification TEM images (Figure 3a3[left] and 3b3[left]) corresponds to the presence of VMg in the SCs (i.e., VMg region) based on previous studies.[ 28 , 31 ]
Figure 3.

Low‐magnification TEM image of (a1) (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC and (b1) (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC. (a2 and b2) [left] High‐magnification TEM image and [right] FFT pattern of the SC region (marked as the R1 region in a1 and b1). (a3 and b3) [left] High‐magnification TEM image and [right] FFT pattern of the VMg region (marked as the R2 region in a1 and b1). (a4 and b4) Filtered inverse FFT image of the R2 region using the two extra spots of the FFT pattern in a3 [right] and b3 [right]. c) [left] High‐magnification TEM image, [middle] HAADF‐STEM image, and [right] Geometric phase analysis (GPA) image of the R3 region in b1.
Fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns were obtained to analyze the VMg region, SC region, and their interfaces. The FFT pattern from the SC region (Figure 3a2[right] and 3b2[right]) displayed a set of diffraction spots, indicating the alignment of atoms in this region, corresponding to the cubic structure from the [111] direction for (Sb, B)‐doped SC and the [110] direction for (Li, B)‐doped SC. The FFT pattern for the VMg region (Figure 3a3[right] and 3b3[right]) showed two sets of spots: bright and dark. The bright spots were similar to the diffraction spots observed in the SC region, while the dark spots were from the VMg region (VMg spots). The VMg spots were close to the Mg2Sn spots due to the smaller lattice constant of the VMg region than that of the SC region, indicating the same lattice structure with only lattice distortions. For a clearer view of the lattice, the inverse FFT (IFFT) image from a set of additional VMg spots (Figure 3a3[right] and 3b3[right], yellow arrow) is shown in Figure 3a4,b4. DCs (marked in red) were located at the interface between the VMg region and SC region due to lattice mismatch, which is widely observed in other thermoelectric materials such as (Sb, Bi)2Te3,[ 43 ] PbTe,[ 44 ] PbSe,[ 45 ] Mg2Si,[ 46 ] and Mg2Sn.[ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ] Figure 3b5 and 3b6 show high‐magnification TEM and atomic‐resolution high‐angle annular dark‐field scanning TEM (HAADF‐STEM) images of the R3 region in Figure 3b. The black area in the R3 region in the TEM image (Figure 3b1) was bright in the HAADF‐STEM image (Figure 3b5). This black area was the Sn‐rich nanoprecipitate (NP), also observed in Li‐doped SCs.[ 31 ] The FFT pattern from the R4 region displayed a set of diffraction spots (Figure 3b6), indicating the same crystal structure for the Sn‐rich NPs and SC region. A geometric phase analysis (GPA) image in Figure 3b7 indicates that no high‐strain center was observed around the interface between the Sn‐rich NP and the SC region.
The density of DCs (N DC) is calculated by dividing the number of DCs by the area in the IFFT images. It is generally believed that the introduction of vacancies promotes dislocation formation. As shown in Figure 4a, the N DC increased with the B doping content; from 1.0 × 1016 m−2 (Sb 2%‐doped SC) to 4.2 × 1016 m−2 ((Sb 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC) and from 3.3 × 1016 m−2 (Li 2%‐doped SC) to 6.8 × 1016 m−2 ((Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC). The increase in N DC is attributable to the increase in the VMg fraction. However, this scenario does not fully explain the B‐doping effect. Figure 4b,c respectively show the average size and density of the VMg regions in the undoped, B‐doped, (Sb, B)‐doped, and (Li, B)‐doped SCs. With the increase in the B dopant content, the average size decreased, whereas the density increased. The decrease in average size was smaller than the increase in density, leading to an overall increase in N DC. The formation process of the VMg regions is illustrated in Figure 4d. During melting at low cooling rates, VMg is sufficiently mobile to form VMg regions. DCs are then formed at the interface between the VMg region and the SC region. If charged dopants (B atoms herein) are introduced into Mg2Sn SCs, VMg 2−‐B3+ complex PDs are formed.[ 25 ] Thus, the aggregation of VMg is repelled, decreasing the average size of the VMg regions. On the other hand, the B dopants apply chemical pressure to Mg2Sn SCs, thereby increasing the VMg fraction and density of the VMg regions.
Figure 4.

a) Dislocation density N DC, b) average size of the VMg regions, and c) density of the VMg regions for undoped,[ 27 ] Sb‐doped,[ 28 ] B‐doped,[ 29 ] Li‐doped,[ 31 ] (Sb, B)‐doped, and (Li, B)‐doped SCs. d) Schematic illustration of the formation of dislocations.
2.3. Electronic Transport Properties
Figure 5a,b depict the dependence of the absolute Seebeck coefficient (S) of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs on temperature, respectively. The (Sb, B)‐doped SCs showed n‐type conduction with electrons as the majority charge carriers, while the (Li, B)‐doped SCs exhibited p‐type conduction with holes as the majority charge carriers. It was observed that the |S| of (Sb, B)‐doped SCs was higher than that of (Li, B)‐doped SCs in the entire temperature ranges; thus, (Sb, B)‐doped SCs may have higher electrical properties than (Li, B)‐doped SCs. Looking across the entire temperature range, as the B content increased from 0% to 0.5%, the |S| of (Sb, B)‐doped SCs slightly increased from |−95(3)| µV K−1 to |−97(3)| µV K−1, whereas that of (Li, B)‐doped SCs decreased. The change in |S| reflects the variation in n H, which can be understood based on the behavior of VMg and the B dopant. As mentioned earlier, VMg acted as an acceptor and B dopant acted as a donor in Mg2Sn. Since the change in VMg was greater than that of the B dopant (≈1% VMg with 0.25% B), the result was a decrease in the electron carrier concentration and an increase in the hole carrier concentration for (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs, respectively. Additionally, as the temperature increased, the |S| of the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs increased across all temperatures. The |S| of the (Li, B)‐doped SCs initially increased and then slightly decreased. The decrease in |S| at high temperatures was caused by the inverse sign of S contributed by the thermal excitation of minority carriers, known as the bipolar effect. Moreover, the increase in the majority carrier concentration helped to suppress this effect.
Figure 5.

a,b) Temperature dependence of the Seebeck coefficient S and (c, d) Pisarenko plot using |S| and carrier concentration n H at 300 K for (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs. The error bars represent SD, n = 3.
The carrier transport behavior and characteristics of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs were analyzed using the Pisarenko relation, which evaluates the scattering factor (r) and effective mass (m *) of carriers. The Pisarenko relation is given by Equation (1):
| (1) |
where k B is the Boltzmann constant, r the scattering parameter (e.g., r = − 1/2 for acoustic phonon scattering, 0 for neutral impurity scattering, 3/2 for ionized impurity scattering, etc.), h the Planck's constant, and e the carrier charge. In Figure 5c,d, the Pisarenko plot displays the dependence of the |S| versus the n H, with different curves representing specific m* and r conditions. The scattering mechanism for Sb 1%‐doped and Li 2%‐doped SCs was acoustic phonon scattering, with r taken as − 1/2. The m * of the n‐type SCs was higher than that of the p‐type SCs, which was in good agreement with the literature data (Table S2, Supporting Information). This difference in m* resulted in better electrical properties of the n‐type SCs. After B doping, no change in the scattering factor was observed for both (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs, indicating that there were no additional scattering mechanisms. According to previous studies,[ 28 , 31 ] the addition of small amounts of dopants and the increase in the amount of VMg have little effect on the scattering factor. More importantly, dense dislocations have no significant impact on m *.
Figure 6a,b present the dependence of electrical conductivity (σ) on temperature for (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs, respectively. All SCs exhibited degenerate semiconductor behavior. Comparing the two types of SCs, the σ of (Sb, B)‐doped SCs was slightly higher than that of (Li, B)‐doped SCs. The σ at 300 K of (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs dropped by ≈10%, specifically, decreasing from 4.12(8) × 103 S cm−1 for the Sb 1%‐doped SC to 3.48(7) × 103 S cm−1 for the (Sb 1%, B 0.5%)‐doped SC. The decrease in σ was attributed to the changes in n H and µ H (Figure 6c,d). The carriers received the combined action of PDs and dislocations. For the carrier concentration, VMg contributed holes and B contributed electrons, and every 0.25% increase in the B content increased VMg by 1%. The result was a decrease in the electron concentration for (Sb, B)‐doped SCs and an increase in the hole concentration for (Li, B)‐doped SCs. As the B content increased, the µ H decreased; however, both (Sb, B)‐doped and (Li, B)‐doped SCs exhibited higher µ H than Mg2Sn‐based PCs.[ 13 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]
Figure 6.

a,b) Electrical conductivity σ and c,d) relationship between the carrier mobility, µ H, and carrier concentration, n H, at 300 K for (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs. The error bars represent SD, n = 1.
Figure 7a,b show the temperature‐dependent PF of the (Sb, B)‐doped and (Li, B)‐doped SCs, respectively. The PF as well as S and σ did not show significant change during the heating and cooling cycles, supporting the chemical stability of the SCs. The PF of the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC (≈4.8(2) mW K−2 m−1) was 6% lower than that of the Sb 1%‐doped SC (≈5.1(3) mW K−2 m−1). The PF of the (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC (≈1.89(9) mW K−2 m−1) was 18% lower than that of the Li 2%‐doped SC (≈2.3(1) mW K−2 m−1). It is worth noting that despite the decrease in PF values, the PFmax of the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs was significantly higher than that of undoped SC[ 26 ] (0.11 mW K−2 m−1) and B‐doped SC[ 28 ] (0.10 mW K−2 m−1). The PFmax of the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs was respectively ≈48 times and ≈19 times higher than that of the B‐doped SC, which verifies the successful co‐doping. Moreover, the PF of the (Sb 1%, B 0.5%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs was still maintained at a high level compared to other Mg2Sn PCs.[ 13 , 26 , 36 , 38 ]
Figure 7.

Power factor PF of a) (Sb, B)‐ and b) (Li, B)‐doped SCs as a function of temperature. The error bars represent SD, n = 3.
2.4. Thermal Transport Properties
The κ tot (= κ ele + κ bip + κ lat) of the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs (open symbols) and (Li, B)‐doped SCs (filled symbols) is shown in Figure 8a,b, respectively. The κ tot of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs decreased as the B content x increased. Especially, the κ tot value of the (Sb 1%, B 0.5%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs was ≈33% and ≈20% lower than that of the Sb 1%‐ and Li 2%‐doped SCs, respectively. The electrical thermal conductivity (κ ele), bipolar thermal conductivity (κ bip), and lattice thermal conductivity (κ lat) were calculated separately to better understand the effect of B doping on the thermal transport properties. The κ ele was estimated using the Wiedemann–Franz law (see Figure S3, Supporting Information), which showed a trend similar to σ, decreasing somewhat to compensate for the deterioration in thermoelectric performance caused by the decrease in σ. The κ bip of the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs was lower than that of the (Li, B)‐doped SCs (Figure S4, Supporting Information). The κ bip behaved opposite to the trend of carrier variation because the increase in n H favored the suppression of the bipolar effect. The κ lat of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs was evaluated using κ lat = κ tot−κ ele−κ bip and is shown in Figure 8c,d, respectively. Similar to the case of B‐doped SCs,[ 29 ] we found that the B dopant significantly contributed to the decrease in κ lat due to the increase in the VMg fraction and N DC. Compared with Sb 1%‐doped SC, a lower κ lat was achieved for (Sb, B)‐doped SCs. A lower κ lat was observed for (Li, B)‐doped SCs than Li 2%‐doped SC. It should be noted that the Li 2%‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs showed an abrupt decrease in κ lat above 600 K. According to a study on the effect of Ag2Te NPs in PbTe,[ 47 ] small NPs (< 2 × 10−8 m) decreased κ lat near room temperature, whereas large NPs (1 × 10−7 −2 × 10−7 m) reduced κ lat at higher temperatures. Herein, the Sn‐rich NPs in the SCs prepared in this study had different sizes (Figure S2c, Supporting Information). Thus, the decrease in κ lat above 600 K is attributable to large NPs in these SCs.
Figure 8.

Temperature dependence of total thermal conductivity κ tot of a) (Sb, B)‐ and b) (Li, B)‐doped SCs. Temperature dependence of lattice thermal conductivity κ lat of c) (Sb, B)‐ and d) (Li, B)‐doped SCs. The error bars represent SD, n = 3.
The Debye model combined with TEM observations was used to estimate the contribution of the Umklapp process (UP) and various defects, including PDs, DCs, and NPs, to the κ lat. Figure 9a shows the measured κ lat at 300 K as a function of the evaluated disorder parameter, Γ (Equations S16–S18, Supporting Information) of (Sb, B)‐doped SCs. The Γ‐dependent calculated κ lat curves with different N DC are also shown. They fitted well with the measured κ lat values, indicating that the VMg and DCs dominated the phonon scattering in the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs. The spectral lattice thermal conductivity κ s was calculated to analyze the effect of various defects on the phonon frequency. Figure 9b,c show that PDs (VMg) and DCs scattered phonons at high and mid frequencies, respectively, in both (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs. The Sn‐rich NPs additionally scattered phonons at low frequencies in the (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC. The temperature‐dependent calculated κ lat of the (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC is shown in Figure S5 (Supporting Information). The κ lat curves from top to bottom represent the calculated κ lat adopting the effects of UP (black), UP+PD (green), UP+PD+DC (brown), and UP+PD+DC+NP (blue). The κ lat calculated considering all scattering processes (UP+PD+DC+NP) well matched the measured κ lat, further supporting that the PDs, DCs, and NPs contributed to the κ lat reduction of the (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC.
Figure 9.

a) Relationship between the κ lat at 300 K and disorder parameter, Γ, for (Sb, B)‐doped SCs. The dotted curves are κ lat calculated at 300 K with different N DC. Frequency‐dependent accumulative reduction in κ lat (κ s) of b) (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and c) (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs, considering the phonon scattering by UP, PD, DC, and NP.
2.5. Quality Factor and Dimensionless Figure of Merit
The temperature‐dependent weighted mobility (µ w) of the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs (open symbols) and the (Li, B)‐doped SCs (filled symbols) is analyzed using Equation (2):[ 48 ]
| (2) |
Here, ρ is the electrical resistivity measured in mΩ∙cm, and k B/e = 86.3 µV K−1. Figure 10a shows that the µ w of the (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs decreased with the increase in the B content. The higher µ w for the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs compared to the (Li, B)‐doped SCs explains the superior electrical properties of n‐type Mg2Sn. Despite the reduction in µ w due to the introduction of B dopant, the µ w values remained higher than those of Li 2%‐doped Mg2Sn PC[ 26 ] and Na 7%‐doped Mg2Sn PC[ 39 ] without dense dislocations. This result demonstrates the advantage of excellent crystallinity in the SCs and the less influence of dislocations on carriers than PCs. Thus, the analysis of µ w provides further evidence of the electrical superiority of the Mg2Sn SCs over Mg2Sn PCs despite the slight reduction in µ w with B doping. To comprehensively understand the role of B in Mg2Sn, the quality factor B Q is appraised using Equation (3):[ 49 ]
| (3) |
Figure 10.

Temperature dependence of a) weighted mobility µ w and b) quality factor B Q of (Sb, B)‐doped SCs (open symbols) and (Li, B)‐doped SCs (filled symbols). c,d) zT values of (Sb, B)‐ and (Li, B)‐doped SCs. The error bars represent SD, n = 3.
The increase in B Q of the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs (Figure 10b) demonstrates the enhanced electrical and thermal properties resulting from the addition of B.
The zT values of the (Sb, B)‐doped SCs were higher than that of the Sb 1%‐doped SC at high temperatures (>500 K) (Figure 10c). Specifically, the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC exhibited the peak zT value (zT peak) of ≈0.83(8) at 650 K, which was ≈15% higher than that of the Sb1%‐doped SC. For the (Li, B)‐doped SCs, the zT peak was found to be 0.42(4) for the (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SC (Figure 10d), which was 11% higher than that of the Li 2%‐doped SC. The high zT values were realized for the (Sb 1%, B 0.25%)‐ and (Li 2%, B 0.25%)‐doped SCs due to the high µ H and low κ lat. This highlights the importance of defect engineering in Mg2Sn SCs in enhancing thermoelectric performance.
3. Conclusion
This study successfully demonstrated the enhancement of thermoelectric characteristics of n‐ and p‐type Mg2Sn SCs by introducing B as a dopant to engineer defects. Adding B increased the chemical pressure in the Mg2Sn lattice, thereby increasing VMg and dislocations. These lattice defects, along with their effects on the precipitation of the Sn‐rich phase in the p‐type Mg2Sn SCs, led to a decrease in carrier mobility and electrical conductivity, ultimately enhancing thermoelectric performance. The peak zT values obtained for both the n‐ and p‐type Mg2Sn SCs were higher than those recently reported for Mg2Sn materials and were close to those of Mg2Sn‐based solid solutions. This research provides valuable insights into how defects can be engineered to improve the thermoelectric properties of Mg2 X (X = Si, Ge, Sn) materials. This study also contributes to understanding the role of defects and their impact on carrier transport and phonon scattering. It provides a guide for enhancing the thermoelectric performance of Mg2Sn and other materials.
4. Experimental Section
Sample Preparation
Mg2‐ x B x Sn0.99Sb0.01 and Mg1.98‐ x Li0.02B x Sn SCs (x = 0, 0.0025, and 0.005) were prepared using the melting method.[ 27 , 28 , 30 ] Mg grains (4N, Mitsuwa Chemicals Co., Ltd. ≈Φ4 mm × L4 mm), Sn powder (4N, Kojundo Chemical Lab., 63 µm pass), Sb powder (5N, Kojundo Chemical Lab., 150 µm), Li rod (3N, Sigma‐Aldrich Co. Ltd., ≈Φ12.7 mm), and B (2N, Kojundo Chemical Lab., 45 µm pass) were weighed according to the stoichiometric ratio. The weighed materials were loaded into a BN‐coated alumina crucible in a glove box filled with an Ar atmosphere and an oxygen concentration of less than 0.1 ppm. The alumina crucible was then loaded into a quartz tube, vacuumed to ≈10−6 Pa after three gas washes, and then charged with Ar gas at a pressure of 0.16 MPa. Here, the role of Ar gas was to provide physical pressure during the synthesis process.[ 27 ] The sealed quartz tubes were placed in a vertical furnace where the furnace was first heated to 1123 K, then cooled to 1023 K at a rate of 2 K h−1, and finally to room temperature within 9 h. The prepared ingot size was ≈Φ10 mm × L20 mm, and the test area was from 2 to 7 mm from the bottom.
Sample Characterization
The crystalline surfaces were characterized using powder XRD (D8 ADVANCE, Bruker) and Laue XRD (RINT, Rigaku). The lattice constants and VMg amounts were obtained using single‐crystal XRD (SC XRD; D8 QUEST, Bruker) characterization combined with refinement. This structural refinement is difficult to achieve using powder XRD patterns due to the high orientations of the powder XRD peaks.[ 10 , 11 ] Small SCs were selected by crushing the ingots and refined using jana2006[ 50 ] (see, Supporting Information for details). An atomic‐resolution analytical electron microscope (JEM‐ARM200F, JEOL) was used to carry out TEM, scanning TEM (STEM), and atomic‐resolution high‐angle annular dark‐field STEM (HAADF‐STEM) observations. All XRD measurements, as well as TEM and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) observations, were performed at room temperature.
The Mg2‐ x B x Sn0.99Sb0.01 and Mg1.98‐ x Li0.02B x Sn SCs were subjected to measurement of S and σ values using an automated thermoelectric tester (RZ2001i, Ozawa Science Co. Ltd.) under a vacuum from 300 to 700 K. The Hall coefficient R H was determined at room temperature by sweeping a magnetic field from −5.0 to 5.0 T using a device for measuring physical parameters (PPMS, Quantum Design). The Hall carrier concentration n H was calculated as n H = |1/(eR H)|, and the Hall carrier mobility µ H was determined using the formula µ H = σR H. The typical sample size used for the S and σ measurements was 2.5 × 2.5 × 8 mm3, and that for the Hall measurements was 2.5 × 6 × 0.8 mm3. The total thermal conductivity κ tot was calculated using the relation κ tot = ρ s DC p, where ρ s, D, and C p are the mass density, thermal diffusivity, and specific heat capacity, respectively. The measured mass density ρ s = m/V, where m is the mass and V is the volume, is shown in Table S4. The ρ s values obtained in this study were lower than that of a Mg2Sn single crystal without VMg (3.59 g cm−3 [ 51 ]), verifying the presence of VMg in the prepared SCs. From the SC‐XRD refinements, ρ s was also evaluated using the refined lattice constant and site occupancies (Table S1, Supporting Information). The difference between the measured and evaluated ρ s may be related to nanostructures: the VMg was confined in the VMg regions, thereby compressing the lattice relative to the SC regions.[ 28 ] The D and C p of the samples were measured from 300 to 700 K under a vacuum using a laser flash apparatus (TC‐7000, ULVAC‐RIKO). The sample size for the D and C p measurements was typically ≈Φ10 mm × L2 mm.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the Grant‐in‐Aid for JSPS Fellows from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 20J10512), JST SPRING from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (No. JPMJSP2114), and Grant‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (Nos. 17H03398, 22H02161). This work was partly based on collaborative research between Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. and Tohoku University, which is part of the Vision Co‐creation Partnership.
Huang Z., Hayashi K., Saito W., et al. “Dislocation Introduction via Domain Engineering in Mg2Sn Single Crystal to Improve its Thermoelectric Properties.” Small Methods 9, no. 9 (2025): 2500385. 10.1002/smtd.202500385
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1. Rowe D. M., CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chen Z., Zhang X., Pei Y., Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hu L., Zhu T., Liu X., Zhao X., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 5211. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Poudel B., Hao Q., Ma Y., Lan Y., Minnich A., Yu B., Yan X., Wang D., Muto A., Vashaee D., Chen X., Liu J., Dresselhaus M. S., Chen G., Ren Z., Science 2008, 320, 634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kim S. I., Lee K. H., Mun H. A., Kim H. S., Hwang S. W., Roh J. W., Yang D. J., Shin W. H., Li X. S., Lee Y. H., Snyder G. J., Kim S. W., Science 2015, 348, 109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chen Z., Ge B., Li W., Lin S., Shen J., Chang Y., Hanus R., Snyder G. J., Pei Y., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. You L., Liu Y., Li X., Nan P., Ge B., Jiang Y., Luo P., Pan S., Pei Y., Zhang W., Snyder G. J., Yang J., Zhang J., Luo J., Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1848. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chen Z., Jian Z., Li W., Chang Y., Ge B., Hanus R., Yang J., Chen Y., Huang M., Snyder G. J., Pei Y., Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sun C., Li W., Shi X., Bu Z., Nan P., Li Y., Ge B., Pei Y., J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 8345. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kubouchi M., Hayashi K., Miyazaki Y., J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 617, 389. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kubouchi M., Ogawa Y., Hayashi K., Takamatsu T., Miyazaki Y., J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 1589. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kubouchi M., Hayashi K., Miyazaki Y., Scr. Mater. 2016, 123, 59. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liu W., Zhou J., Jie Q., Li Y., Seok Kim H., Bao J., Chen G., Ren Z., Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 530. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhu Y., Dong E., Han Z., Jiang F., Sui J., Zhang W., Liu W., Acta Mater. 2021, 217, 117172. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhu Y., Han Z., Jiang F., Dong E., Zhang B. P., Zhang W., Liu W., Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 16, 100327. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hayashi K., JSAP Rev 2022, 2022, 220403. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hayashi K., Kawamura S., Hashimoto Y., Akao N., Huang Z., Saito W., Tasaki K., Hayashi K., Matsushita T., Miyazaki Y., Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hayashi K., Miyazaki Y., Saito W., Kubouchi M., Ogawa Y., Suzuki S., Hayashibara Y., Ando I., in Thermoelectric Material, De Gruyter, Berlin: 2020, pp. 99–116. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhang Q., He J., Zhu T. J., Zhang S. N., Zhao X. B., Tritt T. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 102109. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pshenai‐Severin D. A., Fedorov M. I., Samunin A. Y., J. Electron. Mater. 2013, 42, 1707. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang Q., Yin H., Zhao X. B., He J., Ji X. H., Zhu T. J., Tritt T. M., Phys. Status Solidi A 2008, 205, 1657. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang Q., Cheng L., Liu W., Zheng Y., Su X., Chi H., Liu H., Yan Y., Tang X., Uher C., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 23576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. de Boor J., Saparamadu U., Mao J., Dahal K., Müller E., Ren Z., Acta Mater. 2016, 120, 273. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu W., Kim H. S., Chen S., Jie Q., Lv B., Yao M., Ren Z., Opeil C. P., Wilson S., Chu C.‐W., Ren Z., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2015, 112, 3269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chen H. Y., Savvides N., Dasgupta T., Stiewe C., Mueller E., Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2010, 207, 2523. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Xin J., Zhang Y., Wu H., Zhu T., Fu T., Shen J., Pennycook S. J., Zhao X., Small Methods 2019, 3, 1900412. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Saito W., Hayashi K., Dong J., Li J.‐F., Miyazaki Y., Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Saito W., Hayashi K., Huang Z., Dong J., Li J. F., Miyazaki Y., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 57888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Saito W., Hayashi K., Huang Z., Sugimoto K., Ohoyama K., Happo N., Harada M., Oikawa K., Inamura Y., Hayashi K., Miyazaki T., Miyazaki Y., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 5123. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Huang Z., Hayashi K., Saito W., Miyazaki Y., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 13044. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Huang Z., Hayashi K., Saito W., Pei J., Li J.‐F., Miyazaki Y., J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 2652. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Martin J. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1972, 33, 1139. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen H. Y., Savvides N., Dasgupta T., Stiewe C., Mueller E., Phys. Status Solid. 2010, 207, 2523 [Google Scholar]
- 34. Liu X., Xi L., Qiu W., Yang J., Zhu T., Zhao X., Zhang W., Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1500284. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mao J., Wang Y., Ge B., Jie Q., Liu Z., Saparamadu U., Liu W., Ren Z., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 20726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kamila H., Sahu P., Sankhla A., Yasseri M., Pham H. N., Dasgupta T., Mueller E., de Boor J., J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 1045. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Su Y., Wang Q., Liu K., Zhou S., Liu X.‐C., Xia S.‐Q., Cryst. Growth Des. 2023, 23, 2652. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tani J., Shinagawa T., Chigane M., J. Electron. Mater. 2019, 48, 3330. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Huang Y., Zheng S., Liao H., Qiao S., Han G., Wang G., Huang Z., Li J., Lu X., Zhou X., J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 5452. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Jin Y. R., Feng Z. Z., Ye L. Y., Yan Y. L., Wang Y. X., RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48728. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Inoue T., Chikazumi S., Nagasaki S., Tanuma S., AGNE Technol. Cent. Tokyo Jpn. 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hayashi K., Huang Z., Kuroume T., Fujimori A., Ohoyama K., Happo N., Harada M., Oikawa K., Inamura Y., Hayashi K., Miyazaki Y., (unpublished).
- 43. Kim S. I., Lee K. H., Mun H. A., Kim H. S., Hwang S. W., Roh J. W., Yang D. J., Shin W. H., Li X. S., Lee Y. H., Snyder G. J., Kim S. W., Science 2015, 348, 109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chen Z., Jian Z., Li W., Chang Y., Ge B., Hanus R., Yang J., Chen Y., Huang M., Snyder G. J., Pei Y., Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chen Z., Ge B., Li W., Lin S., Shen J., Chang Y., Hanus R., Snyder G. J., Pei Y., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Xin J., Wu H., Liu X., Zhu T., Yu G., Zhao X., Nano Energy 2017, 34, 428. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Pei Y., Lensch‐Falk J., Toberer E. S., Medlin D. L., Snyder G. J., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 241. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Snyder G. J., Snyder A. H., Wood M., Gurunathan R., Snyder B. H., Niu C., Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Jin Y., Hong T., Wang D., Xiao Y., He W., Gao X., Qiu Y., Zhao L.‐D., Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 20, 100444. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Petříček V., Dušek M., Palatinus L., Z. Für Krist. – Cryst. Mater. 2014, 229, 345. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zaitsev V. K., Fedorov M. I., Eremin I. S., Gurieve E. A., Thermoelectric Handbook: Macro to Nano‐Structured Materials, CRC Press, New York, 2005, p. 29. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
