Abstract
Background
Cryptococcus neoformansis widely distributed in nature and primarily causes infections in various parts of the body through inhalation into the lungs. While C.neoformans infection predominantly occurs in immunocompromised individuals, there has been a significant increase in reports among immunocompetent hosts in recent years. Although the lungs and central nervous system constitute the most common sites of infection, cryptococcal osteomyelitis remains exceptionally rare and is typically associated with disseminated disease in immunodeficient patients. Herein, we present a rare case of isolated tibial cryptococcal osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient.
Case presentation
We report a case of a 64-year-old female who presented with pain, swelling, and increased local skin temperature in the left lower limb for one month without any obvious cause. The patient was initially diagnosed with osteomyelitis at a local county hospital and underwent surgical treatment. Due to poor postoperative healing, she was referred to our hospital for surgical debridement. Preoperative wound specimen culture revealed Luteimonas deserti. Simultaneously, intraoperative tissue samples were taken from the patient for targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) testing, which revealed the presence of C. neoformans. While the culture was negative, the C. neoformans capsular antigen test was positive. The patient had normal immune function and no underlying diseases. Ultimately, the patient was treated with fluconazole and surgery, resulting in a good prognosis.
Conclusions
we report a case of tibial osteomyelitis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans in an immunocompetent patient, with diagnosis confirmed through targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) and serum Cryptococcal capsular antigen testingOur results demonstrate the great potential of tNGS in the detection of infectious pathogens. In patients with negative culture results, tNGS can quickly detect various pathogens, providing accurate diagnosis and facilitating appropriate treatment for patients.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-025-11451-y.
Keywords: Cryptococcus, Osteomyelitis, Tibia, Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS)
Background
Cryptococcus spp. are yeast-like fungus and the pathogens of cryptococcosis; among Cryptococcus species, Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii can both cause cryptococcosis in humans, with C. neoformans infections being the most common. C. neoformans is widely distributed in nature; it is commonly found in the feces of pigeons and other birds as well as in soil contaminated by bird feces. C. neoformans is not typically found in fresh feces, but rather in long-accumulated bird droppings on windowsills and other roosting sites and in vacant buildings [1]. In contrast, C. gattii is mainly found in eucalyptus environments in tropical and subtropical region [2]. The infection route of C. neoformans is generally thought to be the inhalation of fungal spores into the lungs via the respiratory tract, which can cause pneumonia in immunosuppressed patients. However, in immunocompetent hosts, the fungal spores are either cleared by the immune system or form asymptomatic latent infections. In some individuals, immunosuppression can lead to the activation of latent infections, which then spread through the bloodstream to other tissues such as the central nervous system, skin, bones, joints, and other parts of the body. However, the fungus is more invasive in the central nervous system [3, 4]. While cryptococcal osteomyelitis was historically considered to occur almost exclusively in immunocompromised individuals (e.g., AIDS patients), emerging case series have revealed that > 87% of non-HIV-infected individuals with this condition exhibit no identifiable immunologic compromise [5]. C. neoformans osteomyelitis is exceptionally uncommon and typically manifests as part of disseminated disease. Its occurrence in non-HIV-infected, immunocompetent hosts represents an even rarer clinical entity. Herein, We report a case of isolated C. neoformans tibial osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent host. L. deserti was concomitantly isolated from the identical osteomyelitic lesion. L. deserti is a novel strain, first reported to be isolated from desert soil in Inner Mongolia, China, in 2021 [6].
Case presentation
The patient, a 64-year-old female, presented with pain, swelling, and increased local skin temperature in the left lower limb for over a month without any obvious cause, occasionally accompanied by low fever. She later visited the local county people’s hospital, where she was diagnosed with “osteomyelitis” and underwent surgical treatment, the details of which are unknown. After discharge, the patient experienced poor wound healing and exudation around the surgical site, prompting her to seek inpatient treatment at our hospital. Upon admission, examination revealed a surgical wound on the distal end of the patient’s left calf, with local sinus tract formation, a small amount of discharge, redness and swelling of the wound edges, and significant swelling of the left dorsum of the foot. A CT scan of the left calf showed osteomyelitis of the lower segment of the left tibia with postoperative changes(Fig. 1). A pulmonary CT scan showed a nodular high-density focus in the right lung with relatively clear boundaries; multiple small nodules in both lungs, possibly inflammatory; and chronic inflammation in both lungs. The preliminary diagnosis was postoperative osteomyelitis of the left calf and poor wound healing of the left calf. Due to the patient’s poor wound healing and significant postoperative exudation, surgical debridement is required(Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.

CT images of the left tibia
Fig. 2.
Intraoperative images
Before the operation, sterile saline was used to remove the surface secretions of the wound, and a sampling swab was used to take samples from the fresh edge of the lesion for bacterial culture and smear examination. Within 2 h after specimen collection, the specimens were inoculated on blood agar plates and MacConkey agar plates and cultured for 18–20 h at 35℃ in a 5% CO2 environment. On the blood agar plate (Supplementary Image 1), seven medium-sized yellow monomorphic colonies were observed in the original streaking area; A single colony was selected and cultured on blood agar plates for 48 h, after which visible growth of medium-sized, orange-yellow colonies was observed(Supplementary Image 2); And no growth was seen on the MacConkey agar plate (Supplementary Image 3). The pure culture colonies were Gram-negative rods when stained with Gram stain (Supplementary Image 4). The colonies were picked and subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight Mass spectrometry using Autobio and Bruker instruments, yielding no results. The strain was then sent out for 16 S targeted DNA sequencing (Supplementary Image 5). The gene amplification showed a single clear target band. After blast comparison, the sequencing results indicated that the bacterium was L. deserti (NR181370.1) with a similarity of 99.225%.
No bacteria were seen in the bacterial smear results. The blood routine results were as follows: white blood cells (WBC), 7.73 × 109/L(normal 3.5–9.5 × 109/L); neutrophil percentage, 0.839(normal 0.40–0.750); procalcitonin (PCT), 0.032 ng/mL(normal 0–0.05 ng/mL); C-reactive protein (CRP), 3.50 mg/L(normal 0–6.0 mg/L); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 24 mm/h(normal 0–20 mm/h). Liver and kidney function were normal, and the results were negative for human immunodeficiency virus antigen and antibody(HIV Ag/Ab), hepatitis B virus surface antigen(HBsAg), hepatitis C virus antibody(anti-HCV), and syphilis antibody(syphilis Ab). The doctor then performed debridement surgery and collected intraoperative tissue for culture, gram staining, and targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) detection. For the specific tNGS detection methodology, please refer to our previously published article [7]. Histopathological examination was not performed on the intraoperative tissue specimen. Gram staining of intraoperative tissue specimens revealed sparse yeast-like cells exhibiting characteristic morphological features consistent with Cryptococcus spp. However, bacterial and fungal cultures performed simultaneously on the intraoperative tissue sample both demonstrated no growth. The tNGS analysis demonstrated significant genomic coverage of C. neoformans (71,105 sequencing reads) and a quantified concentration of 3 × 10⁴ copies/mL in the specimen, corroborated by a positive serum cryptococcal capsular antigen detection via colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (CrAg-LFA). In contrast, routine aerobic bacterial and fungal cultures of sputum specimens yielded no growth. Subsequently, the patient was finally diagnosed with C. neoformans tibial osteomyelitis.
Based on the examination results, the patient was treated with fluconazole sodium chloride injection (600 mg qd ivgtt; 800 mg qd ivgtt on the first day). After 7 d, the treatment was changed to fluconazole tablets (400 mg qd po) for an 8-week course. Subsequently, the treatment was adjusted to 200 mg qd po for a course of 6–12 months. The patient was discharged 10 d after the operation.
One month later, the patient was readmitted for surgical debridement due to poor wound healing. Preoperatively, wound secretions were taken for bacterial and fungal cultures, both of which were negative. During surgery, tissue samples were taken for bacterial and fungal cultures and tNGS testing. The culture results were all negative, while tNGS detected significant genomic evidence of Enterococcus faecalis (272,750 high-quality sequencing reads), comprehensive pathogen screening concurrently demonstrated the absence of Cryptococcus species across all analyzed genomic targets. During hospitalization, bacterial and fungal cultures of the drainage fluid were tested, all of which were negative. Two weeks later, due to poor wound healing, another debridement surgery was performed; no bacterial or fungal cultures were conducted before or after the debridement. Ten days later, the patient was discharged in good condition.
Discussion and conclusions
Cryptococcosis has caused a significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. In 2022, the World Health Organization listed C. neoformans as a top-priority fungal pathogen [36]. Cryptococcus spp. are opportunistic pathogens that does not spread between patients. Cryptococcal infections mainly occur in immunocompromised individuals, including patients with tumors, sarcoidosis, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, leukemia, and human immunodeficiency virus along with those who have received solid organ transplants and immunosuppressive therapy [4, 37]. The majority of C. gattii infections occur in immunocompetent hosts [2, 4, 38]. However, with recent improvements in diagnosis and treatment, reports of C. neoformans infections have been increasing in immunocompetent patients [37]. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis is quite rare, accounting for only approximately 5% of cryptococcosis cases, the majority of which are caused by C. neoformans [39–41].
The present study involved a systematic search of the PubMed database over the past 5 years for cases of cryptococcal osteomyelitis in non-HIV patients (Table 1). This systematic review identified 28 cases of cryptococcal osteomyelitis. Among these, 16 patients (57.1%) were male. The most commonly affected sites were the spine (n = 5), tibia (n = 5), ribs (n = 3), and calcaneus (n = 3). Underlying conditions were absent in 8 patients (28.6%). Prevalent comorbidities included autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis; n = 6), chronic hepatitis B infection (n = 4), and solid organ transplantation (n = 3). Diagnosis was confirmed in all cases by culture and/or histopathological examination demonstrating Cryptococcus species. Notably, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) concurrently detected Cryptococcus in 3 cases where it was employed. Regarding Management, combined surgical intervention and antifungal therapy were utilized in 16 cases (57.1%), while 12 patients (42.9%) received antifungal treatment alone. Ultimately, resolution of infection was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%).A literature review revealed that the vertebrae are the most common site of infection for cryptococcal osteomyelitis, with the tibia being less common [12, 17, 40].
Table 1.
Summary of cases of Cryptococcal osteomyelitis in HIV-Negative patients
| Year | Country | Age(years) /Sex |
Location | Initial diagnosis | Fundamental disease |
Diagnostic methods | First-line therapy |
Surgery | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025[8] | India | 35/M |
Tibia, Radius |
Diagnosis remained unestablished |
Post-renal, transplantation, Tuberculosis, Diabetes mellitus |
Culture, Histopathological examination |
Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) 200 mg daily (5 mg/kg/day); Oral flucytosine 1250 mg every 6 h. | YES | Cured |
| 2025[9] | USA | 89/M | Spine | Diagnosis remained unestablished | NO |
Culture, CrAg |
Liposomal Amphotericin B | NO | Improved |
| 2025[10] | India | 27/M | Calcaneus, Tibia | Tuberculosis | Leprosy |
Culture, Histopathological examination |
liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg IV daily), oral fluconazole (400 mg daily) |
YES | Cured |
| 2024[11] | India | 27/M | Calcaneus, Tibia | Diagnosis remained unestablished | Leprosy |
Culture, Histopathological examination |
Fluconazole (400 mg daily) for long-term | YES | Cured |
| 2024[12] | China | 41/F | Radius | Bacterial osteomyelitis | Chronic hepatitis B |
Culture, Histopathological examination, mNGS |
Oral fluconazole consolidation therapy: 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. | YES | Cured |
| 2024[13] | China | 28/M | multiple bones | Diagnosis remained unestablished | Chronic hepatitis B | Culture | Initial therapy: IV amphotericin B + oral flucytosine for 4 weeks.Consolidation: Oral fluconazole for 1 year. | NO | Cured |
| 2024[14] | China | 56/F | Spine | Tuberculosis | Tuberculosis |
Histopathological examination, CrAg, |
Induction: Amphotericin B (0.6 mg/kg/day IV) + flucytosine (100 mg/kg/day PO) × 4 weeks | NO | Cured |
| Consolidation: Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO × 8 weeks | |||||||||
| Maintenance: Fluconazole 200 mg/day PO ≥ 6 months | |||||||||
| 2024[15] | United States | 45/M | Humeral | Pneumonia |
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Crohn’s Disease |
Culture, CrAg, |
Flucytosine (5-FC) and Amphotericin B | YES | Death |
| 2024[16] | China | 67/F |
Ankle, Fibula |
Tuberculosis | Tuberculosis |
mNGS, Histopathological examination, CrAg |
Flucytosine 1 g IV q12h × 25 d + Fluconazole 400 mg IV daily → Fluconazole 300 mg PO daily × 12mo | YES | Cured |
| 2023[17] | China | 37/M | Sacrum |
Tumor, Tuberculosis |
NO | Culture, Histopathological examination | IV fluconazole (4 weeks) → Oral fluconazole consolidation (8 weeks) | YES | Cured |
| 2023[18] | Australia | 53/M | Spine | Diagnosis remained unestablished | HLA-B27-associated chronic uveitis, hypertension |
Histopathological examination, CrAg |
Induction: Liposomal amphotericin B + flucytosine × 4 weeks→ Consolidation & maintenance: Fluconazole | NO | Cured |
| 2023[19] | India | 42/M | Ischial, Pubis | Diagnosis remained unestablished | Diabetes |
Histopathological examination, CrAg |
Liposomal amphotericin B IV + Flucytosine IV→ Fluconazole 400 mg daily × 6 months | YES | Cured |
| 2023[20] | Greece | 82/F | Tibia | Diagnosis remained unestablished |
Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis |
Culture | Fluconazole IV loading dose 800 mg → 400 mg daily × 3 weeks → Fluconazole 200 mg PO every 12 h × 9 months | YES | Cured |
| 2023[21] | China | 16/F | Disseminated Cryptococcal Infection Without Specified Osteomyelitis Site | Tumor |
Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Yolk Sac Tumor, |
Culture | Fluconazole IV (loading 800 mg → 400 mg daily) + Flucytosine 150 mg 6 h, Added Liposomal Amphotericin B 60 mg/day IV | NO | Cured |
| 2023[22] | China | 31/F | Acetabulum | Diagnosis remained unestablished | Chronic hepatitis B | Histopathological examination | Fluconazole and Flucytosine | NO | Cured |
| 2022[23] | United States | 46/F | Rib | Pneumonia | Multiple sclerosis |
Culture, CrAg |
Liposomal amphotericin B IV + Flucytosine PO × 2 weeks, Maintenance: Fluconazole 400 mg PO daily × 6–12 months | NO | Cured |
| 2022[24] | Brazil | 20/F | Femur | Bacterial osteomyelitis | NO | Culture, Histopathological examination | Amphotericin B deoxycholate IV × 2 weeks, Fluconazole PO × 6 months (maintenance) | YES | Cured |
| 2022[25] | United States | 29/M | Humerus | Skin and subcutaneous infections | NO |
Culture, CrAg |
Fluconazole 800 mg once daily for 2 weeks → 400 mg once daily for 6 months | YES | Cured |
| 2022[26] | China | 79/F | Ulna | Bacterial osteomyelitis | NO | Culture | Fluconazole 200 mg IV twice daily → transitioned to oral 400 mg once daily. | YES | Cured |
| 2022[27] | China | 45/F | Pubis | Tumor | NO | Culture, Histopathological examination | luconazole 400 mg daily for 16 weeks | NO | Cured |
| 2022[28] | United States | 50/F | Femoral, Humeral | Multiple myeloma | NO |
Culture, Histopathological examination, CrAg |
Liposomal amphotericin B IV + Flucytosine PO × 2 weeks, Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO × 8 weeks, Fluconazole 200 mg/day PO × 12 months | NO | Cured |
| 2022[29] | USA | 36/M | Tibia | Diagnosis remained unestablished |
Chronic hepatitis B, Tuberculosis |
Culture, | Fluconazole and Amphotericin B | YES | Cured |
| 2022[30] | China | 41/M | Spine | Tumor | NO |
Histopathological examination, mNGS |
Discontinued flucytosine + amphotericin B 5 days, Fluconazole 400 mg daily | YES | Cured |
| 2021[31] | China | 46/F | Spine | Tumor | Sjögren’s Syndrome | Histopathological examination | Fluconazole 400 mg daily for 6 months | NO | Cured |
| 2021[32] | USA | 11/M | Rib | Bacterial osteomyelitis | Lung Transplantation |
Culture, Histopathological examination, CrAg |
Fluconazole 400 mg daily + Flucytosine 750 mg q6h × 14mo | NO | Cured |
| 2021[33] | Argentina | 69/F | Calcaneus | Diagnosis remained unestablished | Renal Transplantation | Histopathological examination | Liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day IV × 25 days, Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO × 8 weeks | YES | Cured |
| 2020[34] | India | 20/M | Rib | Tuberculosis | Primary T-Cell Immunodeficiency | Histopathological examination | Liposomal amphotericin B 4 mg/kg/day IV + Flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day PO in 4 divided doses × 6 weeks, Fluconazole 800 mg/day PO × 8 weeks | NO | Cured |
| 2020[35] | Japan | 70/M | Humerus | Bacterial osteomyelitis | Multiple Sclerosis |
Histopathological examination, CrAg |
Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO × 5 months,200 mg/day PO × 17 months | YES | Cured |
In our case, the patient had tibial osteomyelitis caused by C. neoformans, and L. deserti was also isolated from the infected site. L. deserti is a novel strain that was first isolated from desert soil in Inner Mongolia, China, in 2021. To date, L. deserti has not been documented in human subjects within the indexed medical literature. In our case, L. deserti was cultured from the preoperative specimen during the first hospital admission of the patient. The bacterial and fungal cultures of the intraoperative tissue specimens were negative, and tNGS detected only C. neoformans. The inconsistent results of the two cultures before and during the operation may be attributed to the presence of L. deserti on the wound surface of the patient; the small amount of bacteria contained within the intraoperative tissue resulted in the negative culture results. Although the tNGS analysis of the intraoperative tissue revealed C. neoformans, the culture was negative. This may be because the content of C. neoformans in the specimen was low, and the sensitivity of tNGS is much higher than that of the culture. The targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) assay detected C. neoformans but did not identify L.deserti, as the latter species was not encompassed within the predefined genomic targets of the panel. As a detection method, tNGS has high sensitivity, especially for pathogens with negative cultures. Serologic surveillance revealed unremarkable inflammatory markers: WBC, CRP, PCT and ESR all remained within normal limits. L. deserti was only cultured from the wound specimen collected preoperatively during the patient’s first admission to our hospital. Subsequently, cultures from multiple wound specimens did not show any growth of this bacterium. Further mechanistic investigations are warranted to elucidate the pathogenic potential of L. deserti and characterize its ecological role during co-isolation events with C. neoformans in human infections.Technical constraints precluded ancillary verification of L. deserti presence in intraoperative specimens. Consequently, the bacterium’s role in this infection remains undefined. Based on diagnostically confirmed evidence—including targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) detection and positive serum cryptococcal capsular antigen testing—C. neoformans was established as the primary etiologic agent of the tibial osteomyelitis.
This case is an elderly woman who presented with left lower limb pain, swelling, and increased local skin temperature without any obvious cause. The patient was immunocompetent and had no underlying diseases such as diabetes, tuberculosis, or autoimmune disease. The patient had also not received any immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids or biologics. Blood tests showed only a slight increase in ESR, normal infection indicators (PCT, CRP, and WBC), and normal liver and kidney function. Tests for human immunodeficiency virus antigen and antibodies, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibodies, and syphilis antibodies were negative. During the patient’s treatment in our hospital, antifungal therapy was initiated only after the tNGS report was received.
Common clinical manifestations of cryptococcal osteomyelitis include soft tissue swelling and tenderness. Imaging usually shows osteolytic lesions, which are difficult to distinguish from osteomyelitis caused by other pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Brucella and Actinomyces [13, 17, 42, 43]. Analysis of the published cases revealed a consistent diagnostic challenge: cryptococcal osteomyelitis was frequently not considered initially. In the majority of cases identified in the literature (18/28, 64.3%), the initial differential diagnoses centered on tuberculosis, Malignancy, or common bacterial infection. Furthermore, in the remaining 10 cases (35.7%), while an infectious process was recognized, the specific pathogen remained unidentified and cryptococcal infection was excluded from the differential diagnosis (Table 1). Consistent with this pattern, cryptococcal osteomyelitis was also not initially suspected in our own case. C. neoformans tibial osteomyelitis is a diagnostic challenge due to its low incidence, atypical presentation, and non-specific imaging findings, which can easily lead to misdiagnosis.
The diagnosis of cryptococcosis can be confirmed by positive India ink staining, positive culture, or histopathological detection of Cryptococcus in the blood, deep tissue samples, or sterile body fluids (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid). The positive detection of C. neoformans polysaccharide antigen in cerebrospinal fluid and blood can also serve as confirmatory evidence for cryptococcosis [3, 4, 37]. Non-culture methods such as PCR and other molecular diagnostic techniques can also provide microbiological evidence for a presumptive diagnosis [37]. Although Cryptococcus smears with India ink staining are simple and rapid, the positive rate is low. Fungal culture is time consuming and also has a low positive rate. Histopathology is the gold standard but it is invasive and limited in its implementation. Serum C. neoformans capsular antigen detection has a sensitivity of over 99% and can be performed semi-quantitatively [3, 4, 44, 45]. However, this method cannot determine the site of infection, and many cases of cryptococcal osteomyelitis are diagnosed by culture or pathology before cryptococcal capsular antigen testing is performed [40], our occurred in the current case. In most cases, cryptococcal osteomyelitis is diagnosed by obtaining samples through puncture biopsy for culture and pathological examination [17]. In our case, cryptococcal osteomyelitis was diagnosed through tNGS and C. neoformans capsular antigen testing. tNGS based on multiplex PCR amplification or probe-targeted capture can selectively amplify or enrich target fragments and simultaneously detect dozens to hundreds of pathogens in a single sample, making tNGS an efficient, cost-effective, and accurate tool for pathogen detection [46–48]. Compared to mNGS, tNGS exhibits enhanced specificity through directed enrichment, reduced sequencing depth requirements, simplified bioinformatic processing, and higher sensitivity within a defined pathogen spectrum—alongside lower operational costs and shorter turnaround times. When benchmarked against conventional microbiological assays (e.g., staining, culture, serology, or PCR), tNGS demonstrates superior pathogen detection breadth and diagnostic yield [46, 48, 49]. Collective recommendations from multiple Chinese expert consensuses on tNGS advocate its implementation for spinal or osteoarticular infections when conventional microbiological assays yield negative results or empirical antimicrobial therapy fails to achieve clinical improvement within 48–72 h [49–51]. Studies have demonstrated that tNGS exhibits higher sensitivity than conventional culture for etiological detection in focal infections [48, 52, 53]. Multiple reported cases of cryptococcal osteomyelitis have successfully detected C. neoformans using mNGS [12, 16, 30]. In our case, C. neoformans was detected through the tNGS testing of intraoperative tissue, while the culture was negative. Subsequently, the serum C. neoformans capsular antigen test based on cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay was positive. Based on these results, the clinicians changed the treatment plan and administered fluconazole to the patient, which reduced the risk of disease progression, shortened the patient’s hospital stay, and alleviated the economic burden.
The patient in this case kept pigeons at home and had no history of trauma. Chest CT revealed nodules and chronic inflammation, and the patient’s immune function was normal. The patient underwent sputum culture, which did not detect C. neoformans. The patient did not undergo bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or cerebrospinal fluid examination because no obvious symptoms of respiratory or central nervous system infection were present. Therefore, it could not be determined whether the patient had pulmonary cryptococcosis. The patient’s infection with C. neoformans might have been caused by exposure to pigeon droppings in the environment; the spores of C. neoformans were likely inhaled into the lungs and subsequently spread to the tibial bone marrow through the bloodstream.
Currently, no clinical treatment guidelines or consensus are available for non-pulmonary, non-central nervous system cryptococcosis. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis is rare, and most patients are treated with a combination of surgery and antifungal therapy [37]. Among the reviewed cases, 16 (57.1%) received combined surgical and medical treatment, while 12 (42.9%) were Managed with medical therapy alone. Clinical resolution was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%) (Table 1). Most experts think that fluconazole monotherapy is sufficient for most cases of localized bone cryptococcosis [40]. For patients with the risk of hematogenous dissemination, some experts recommend that skeletal cryptococcosis be initially treated with amphotericin B combined with flucytosine [39]. In our case, the patient was treated with surgical debridement and fluconazole, and the prognosis was favorable.
In summary, We report a case of tibial osteomyelitis caused by C. neoformans in an immunocompetent patient, with diagnosis confirmed through targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) and serum cryptococcal capsular antigen testing. TNGS can rapidly detect a variety of pathogenic microorganisms in patients with negative results from traditional microbiological tests, thereby providing accurate diagnosis and facilitating appropriate treatment.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- tNGS
Targeted next-generation sequencing
- WBC
White blood cells
- PCT
Procalcitonin
- CRP
C-reactive protein
- ESR
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
- CT
Computed tomography
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus.
Authors’ contributions
QWJ and GYN were responsible for the acquisition and interpretation of the patient data and writing the original draft. LZY, WHH and HHB prepared the patient data and supplementary Images. ZLY prepared figure 1 and TSL prepared figure 2. WXN and ZLY reviewed and edited the manuscript. XL supervised and reviewed the manuscript. Weijuan Qin and Yuni Guo contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by Self-financed scientific research of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health Commission in 2024(NO.Z-A20240638) and National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2024(NO.82360412).
Data availability
The datasets generated during this study are available in the NCBI GenBank repository under accession number PV400546 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV400546.1/).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images, and other potentially identifiable data. The patient acknowledged reviewing the final manuscript prior to submission and understands that it, along with the associated multimedia files, will be publicly available.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Weijuan Qin and Yuni Guo contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Carroll KC, Pfaller MA. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 13th Edition. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2024. p. 1287–90.
- 2.Poplin V, Smith C, Caceres DH, Herkert PF, Jegede O, Thompson GR 3rd, et al. Geographical distribution of the Cryptococcus Gattii species complex: a systematic review. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5(12):100921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tugume L, Ssebambulidde K, Kasibante J, Ellis J, Wake RM, Gakuru J, et al. Cryptococcal meningitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9(1):62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meya DB, Williamson PR. Cryptococcal disease in diverse hosts. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(17):1597–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang X-b, Lin H, Wu X. Nong G-m. Update on disseminated cryptococcosis in non-HIV infected children. Ital J Pediatr. 2025; 51(1):177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Huang XX, Shang J, Xu L, Yang R, Sun JQ. Luteimonas deserti sp. nov., a novel strain isolated from desert soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(10):005098. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Wei H, Fu Y, Qin W, Liang Z, Zhou L, Gao J, et al. The relationship between virulence and drug resistance genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and antibiotic resistance: a targeted next-generation sequencing approach. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;15:1563741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Sanshriti Chauhan SG. Gopendro Singh naorem. Multifocal Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis in a kidney transplant recipient. Indian J Nephrol. 2025;35(3):436–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stack MA, Lavik J-P, Schneider JG, Cross BE. Speckled-egg staining appearance of Cryptococcal osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient. IDCases. 2025;39:e02171. 10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Keche A, Sarathi S, Jana S, Gupta Y. Microbiological Diagnosis: A Key to Successfully Managing Cryptococcal Osteomyelitis Coexisting With Leprosy. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e80143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Chhabra N, Peethambaran AS, Kar BK, Reddy PSM, Ganguly S. Cryptococcosis involving skin and bone in a non-HIV lepromatous leprosy patient with chronic type 2 lepra reaction. Int J Dermatol. 2024;64(1):188–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li Y, Zhang J, Lü L, Hong H, Wang Q, Chen C.Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis of the radius treatment with antifungal calcium sulphate: a case report and literature review. Heliyon. 2024;10(19):e37514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee YM, Liu YM, Chen TC. Disseminated Cryptococcus neoformans infection involving multiple bones and lung in an immunocompetent patient: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou Y, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhou X, Liu Q. Destructive cryptococcal osteomyelitis mimicking tuberculous spondylitis. Am J Case Rep. 2024;25:e944291. 10.12659/AJCR.944291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Yatsonsky D, Gunn J, Zajac K, Burke C, Bair J. Orthopedic manifestations of disseminated Cryptococcal neoformans infection in an immunocompromised patient: a case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2024;14(6):19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qin Y, Zou X, Jin Y, Li J, Cai Q. Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis of the right ankle diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in a HIV-negative patient with tuberculous lymphadenitis and pulmonary tuberculosis: a case report and recent literature review. Infect Drug Resist. 2024;17:3805–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhong Y, Huang Y, Zhang D, Chen Z, Liu Z, Ye Y. Isolated cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the sacrum in an immunocompetent patient: a case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Riceman MD, Sun C, Pierides J, Catford J, Nelson R, Ashokan A. Back pain in an Australian farmer: an unusual case of Cryptococcal osteomyelitis. Med J Aust. 2023;219(11):523–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ramanathan K, Hegde MG, Subbaiyan E, Raghavan B, Subramony H. Cryptic presentation of Cryptococcal osteomyelitis in an apparently immunocompetent individual. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2023;10:004021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Papadakis SA, Gourtzelidis G, Pallis D, Ampadiotaki M-M, Tatakis F, Tsivelekas K, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis of the tibia: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang J, Li H, Lan C, Weng H. Disseminated cryptococcal infection with pulmonary involvement presenting as diffuse cavitary nodules in an immunocompromised patient: a case report. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23(1):38. 10.1186/s12890-023-02332-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Chen K, Zhou C, Zhang J, Chen Y, Ding X, Chen F, Feng K. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the left acetabulum: a case report. Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 2023;19(8):965–9. 10.2174/1573405619666221125103107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Carpenter K, Etemady-Deylamy A, Costello V, Khasawneh M, Chamberland R, Tian K, et al. Cryptococcal chest wall mass and rib osteomyelitis associated with the use of fingolimod: a case report and literature review. Front Med. 2022;9:942751. 10.3389/fmed.2022.942751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Gonçalves JRR, Tres KE, Narciso LS, Corrêa R, Perez RD. Fungal osteomyelitis of the hip with septic arthritis: case report. Rev Bras Ortop. 2022;59(S 01):e49-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dumenigo A, Sen M. Cryptococcal Osteomyelitis in an Immunocompetent Patient. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Ma J-L, Liao L, Wan T, Yang F-C. Isolated cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the ulna in an immunocompetent patient: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(19):6617–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.He S, Luo T, Xie Y, Zhu X, Lei J, Cai L, Deng Z. Pubis cryptococcal osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient: a case report and recent literature review. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:7369–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hsu E, Webster SM, Nanes M. Disseminated cryptococcosis in an immunocompetent host presenting as osteomyelitis and leading to adrenal insufficiency. Am J Med Sci. 2022;363(1):75–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Isaac M, Patel P, Rojas-Moreno C, Nguyen T, Ahmed R. Pulmonary tuberculosis and Cryptococcal native knee septic arthritis with osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient: mycobacterial effect on CD4 function and cellular immunity. IDCases. 2022;29:e01571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Wang R, Luo H, Xin X, Qin B, Huang W. Disseminated cryptococcal infection of the lumbar spine in an immunocompetent man. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:4229–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu L, Song X, Zhang Y, Lin N, Wang J-A. Sjögren’s syndrome with nervous system injury combined with pulmonary and osseous cryptococcosis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15(1):325. 10.1186/s13256-021-02941-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Schrader A, Melicoff E, Munoz F, Mallory GB, Curry CV, Gazzaneo MC. Diagnosis and treatment of Cryptococcal osteomyelitis in a pediatric lung transplant patient. Pediatr Transplant. 2021;26(2):e14165. 10.1111/petr.14165. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Ghioldi ME, Dealbera ED, Chemes LN, Caballero GA, Del Vecchio JJ. Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis of the calcaneus: case report and literature review. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2021;9:2050313X211027094. 10.1177/2050313X211027094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Ramesh V, Rao Polati V, Nimmala P, Anand M, Narreddy S, Saidulu G. An unusual cause for rib osteomyelitis in the tropics: Cryptococcal osteomyelitis. Trop Doct. 2020;50(4):361–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Onishi O, Kida Y, Kiba T, Kabuto Y, Minami M, Nishimura A, et al. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the entire humerus. JBJS Case Connect. 2020;10(4):e2000279–0022000279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Organization WH. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. Geneva: World Health rganization; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chang CC, Harrison TS, Bicanic TA, Chayakulkeeree M, Sorrell TC, Warris A, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of cryptococcosis: an initiative of the ECMM and ISHAM in Cooperation with the ASM. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24(8):e495–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hallas-Møller M, Burow M, Henrissat B, Johansen KS. Cryptococcus neoformans: plant-microbe interactions and ecology. Trends Microbiol. 2024;32(10):984–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wood L, Miedzinski L. Skeletal cryptococcosis: case report and review of the literature. Can J Infect Dis. 1996;7(2):125–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Medaris LA, Ponce B, Hyde Z, Delgado D, Ennis D, Lapidus W, et al. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis: a report of 5 cases and a review of the recent literature. Mycoses. 2016;59(6):334–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou HX, Lu L, Chu T, Wang T, Cao D, Li F, et al. Skeletal cryptococcosis from 1977 to 2013. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Matsuki T, Miyamoto S, Yamashita T. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the zygomatic bone: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Behrman RE, Masci JR, Nicholas P. Cryptococcal skeletal infections: case report and review. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12(2):181–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Boulware DR, Rolfes MA, Rajasingham R, von Hohenberg M, Qin Z, Taseera K, et al. Multisite validation of Cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay and quantification by laser thermal contrast. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(1):45–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jitmuang A, Panackal AA, Williamson PR, Bennett JE, Dekker JP, Zelazny AM. Performance of the Cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay in non-HIV-related cryptococcosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(2):460–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen Q, Yi J, Liu Y, Yang C, Sun Y, Du J, et al. Clinical diagnostic value of targeted next–generation sequencing for infectious diseases (review). Mol Med Rep. 2024;30(3):153. 10.3892/mmr.2024.13277. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47.Xu JH, Cui YB, Wang LJ, Nan HJ, Yang PY, Bai YL, Shi MY. Pathogen detection by targeted next-generation sequencing test in adult hematological malignancies patients with suspected infections. Front Med. 2024;11: 1443596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang P, Liu B, Zhang S, Chang X, Zhang L, Gu D, et al. Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing in severe pneumonia: a retrospective review. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.The Laboratory Medicine Society CAoME. Expert consensus on the standardized application of targeted next–generation sequencing in the infectious diseases Chinese. J Lab Med. 2025;48(4):469–77. [Google Scholar]
- 50.of NCRCfIDIDPC, Center SMASIDQC. Expert consensus on the application of targeted next-generation sequencing in infectious diseases. Chin J Clin Infect Dis. 2024;17(6):401–12. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Healthcare SoCMoCIEaPAfMa. Expert consensus on the application and practice of targeted next-generation sequencing in infectious diseases. Natl Med J China. 2024;104(48):4375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yin Y, Zhu P, Guo Y, Li Y, Chen H, Liu J, et al. Enhancing lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis: implementation and clinical assessment of multiplex PCR-based and hybrid capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing. eBioMedicine. 2024;107:105307. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Colman RE, Seifert M, De la Rossa A, Georghiou SB, Hoogland C, Uplekar S, et al. Evaluating culture-free targeted next-generation sequencing for diagnosing drug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre clinical study of two end-to-end commercial workflows. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025;25(3):325–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during this study are available in the NCBI GenBank repository under accession number PV400546 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV400546.1/).

