Abstract
After birth, the infant’s intestine is colonized by microorganisms, initiating a period of rapid microbial expansion and major compositional maturation influenced by both maternal and environmental factors. Simultaneously, the host’s intestinal environment exhibits unique characteristics that facilitate critical interactions with the developing microbiome during this early-life window. These early biological events have lasting effects on health, fostering immune tolerance to environmental exposures or, conversely, increasing susceptibility to noncommunicable diseases—such as allergies, obesity, and inflammatory bowel disease—if microbiome development is disrupted. In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding the key stages of microbiome development after birth and explore how changes in the maternal environment—especially diet—as well as maternal intestinal bacteria and their derived molecules shape the microbiome’s composition and function in early-life, ultimately influencing long-term health and disease risk.
Video Abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-025-02186-8.
Introduction
Modernization and industrialization have profoundly transformed human lifestyles, impacting diet, hygiene practices, and medical care. While these advancements have significantly improved the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, they have been paralleled by a marked increase in the incidence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1–3]. Notably, autoimmune conditions such as type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis, as well as diseases with a chronic inflammatory component including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have risen dramatically over the past few decades [4–10]. Emerging evidences suggest that disruptions in the early-life interactions between the gut microbiome and the host’s intestinal environment may contribute to the development of these diseases, thus potentially contributing to the rising rates of NCDs [11, 12]. These interactions involve not only the microbiota, describing the intestinal microbial ecosystem, but also relies on its specific activities and derived compounds as well as its response to surrounding environmental factors; altogether designated as the microbiome which will be the focus of this manuscript [13].
As human are born, they are inoculated with microorganisms, among them some being from maternal origin. This community will colonize all body sites and develop extensively during the first years of life, undergoing major gradual changes in composition and richness [14]. The maternal microbiome’s contribution to the one of her offspring is reflected in the significant proportion of microbial strains shared between mothers and their children, a pattern not observed when comparing unrelated individuals within the same household [15]. Moreover, during early-life development, the mother plays a crucial role in shaping the offspring's microbiome through shared environments and breast milk components. This maternal influence on the next generation’s microbiome is gaining increasing attention, as a well-balanced microbiome during the early life period is essential for proper interactions with the developing mucosal immune system. These interactions are critical for establishing immune tolerance, and disruptions in this process have been linked to long-term consequences, including increased susceptibility to a broad range of NCDs [16–19]. Consistent with this concept, growing evidence underscores the influence of maternal factors, such as diet, on the modulation of the offspring’s developing microbiome [20–24]. In this review, we first explored the parallel development of the gut microbiome and the host’s immune system during the early-life period, highlighting their unique characteristics compared to adults. We then detailed mechanisms through which maternal factors are influencing the neonatal microbiome, emphasizing the role of maternal microbiome in shaping the early-life microbiome. Finally, we discussed the long-term consequences of early-life perturbations of host-microbiome interactions, specifically those induced by maternal factors, and outline current knowledge gaps and potential avenues for therapeutic intervention during this critical developmental window.
The early-life microbiome and immune compartment develop concomitantly and interdependently
Establishment of the intestinal microbiota
Under normal conditions, the fetal gastrointestinal tract is suspected to be sterile, with the first exposure of the host mucosal surfaces to commensals occurring during the birth process [25]. The maternal microbiota, from various origins (vaginal, skin, intestinal, etc.) hence constitutes the first microbial inoculum, and from birth, first colonizers include facultative anaerobes bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium that create a new environment to promote the colonization of strict anaerobes [26–29]. This is next followed by colonization with Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Bifidobacterium spp. The intestinal microbiota of neonates is characterized by low diversity dominated by the phyla Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, with specific metabolism enabling simple carbohydrate degradation and amino acid transportation [27]. In the subsequent months, as solid food is introduced, microbiota diversity increases gradually, with the emergence and expansion of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, as well as appearance of species known for their capacity to ferment different carbohydrates including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [27]. These changes induce a metabolic shift toward complex carbohydrate degradation, short-chain fatty acid (SCFAs) production, and amino acid biosynthesis [14, 29–32]. By the end of the first year of life, infants possess an individually distinct microbial profile, converging toward the characteristic of an adult microbiota, reaching complete stability by 2–5 years of age [14, 32], even if such stable status is a relative concept. A more precise description of microbiota development from birth to an adult-like state has been hindered by the significant interindividual variability observed in the human population, which results in this establishment not being universal at the strain level. Moreover, microbiota analysis techniques—including 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, metagenomics, and culture-based approaches—as well as heterogeneity in DNA extraction methods, sample collection, and storage conditions, have all been reported to introduce variability in microbial composition [33–35]. These factors must therefore be carefully considered when interpreting results or comparing data across studies. However, despite population diversity and pre-analytics/analytics-induced variation, key clusters have been identified as keystone steps in microbiota development in children [31]. Such approach, undertaken in the study by Stewart et al. identified in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study 10 microbiota clusters, which were strongly associated with children’s age, leading to the identification of three distinct phases of microbiome progression: a developmental phase (months 3–14), a transitional phase (months 15–30), and a stable phase (≥ 31 months) [31]. In terms of composition, all five phyla change significantly in the developmental phase, revealing the high dynamism and microbiota remodulation ongoing during this phase. During the transitional phase, only Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes changed significantly, while in the stable phase, composition were observed to be relatively stable, suggesting that stabilization is reached by the human adult-like microbiota after this early-life period [31].
Early-life microbiota development is shaped by a myriad of factors, with initial colonization playing a pivotal role. Compared to vaginally born infants, those delivered by C-section exhibit significant compositional differences, with an enrichment in skin-associated bacteria [14, 29, 36–38]. As the microbiota develops, the impact of the delivery mode diminishes [14, 29, 36, 38], while the high dynamic nature of the early-life microbiota during its establishment makes it particularly susceptible to environmental influences, including maternal factors. Such critical window of microbial development coincides with the maturation of the host’s intestinal compartment, especially the mucosal immune system, which depends on proper interactions with the evolving gut microbiota [17, 18, 39].
The early-life intestinal compartment is shaped to foster microbiome development
The intestinal epithelium and mucosal immune system of newborns are drastically different from the one of adults, resulting in responses to similar stimuli that can drastically vary according to the developmental stage of the individual. This is for example highlighted by the increased susceptibility of newborns to infections compared to adults [40].
The first notable difference in the early life period is the differential expression of many pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) compared to the adult intestine (Fig. 1) [41–45]. Indeed, the expression of several toll-like receptor (TLR)-encoding genes by the intestinal epithelium undergoes significant changes with age. For instance, Fulde et al. reported that the gene encoding the flagellin-specific receptor TLR5 is expressed 100 times more during early life [44, 46], whereas Tlr3 expression increases gradually after birth [42]. When comparing the expression profiles of genes encoding TLRs in the mouse intestine between conventional and germ-free mice, differences were observed as Tlr1, Tlr4, and Tlr9 were found to be decreased in germ-free animals, suggesting microbiome-dependent regulation of such genes expression [42]. Additionally, the signaling pathways and subsequent immune responses triggered by TLR binding by their ligands are highly specific to the early-life period. High amounts of the perinatal alarmins S100A8 and S100A9 have been reported to specifically alter MyD88-dependent proinflammatory programs, thus preventing hyperinflammatory responses (Fig. 1) [47]. However, such modulation of the immune response to microorganisms does not affect TIR domain containing adaptor inducing interferon-β (TRIF)-mediated pathways, resulting in a selective, transient microbial unresponsiveness that prevents harmful hyperinflammation in the delicate neonate while allowing for sufficient immunological protection [47]. Such tight regulation of TLR signaling has also been described for TLR4 in early-life, as epithelial TLR4 signaling is reprogrammed following the production of the small mRNA miR-146a prior to weaning (Fig. 1) [48]. This reprogramming inhibits the transcription of the TLR signaling molecule IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) 1, thus dampening the TLR signaling cascade that results in pro-inflammatory genes expression [48].
Fig. 1.
Early-life microbiota sensing machinery and associated intestinal immune reaction. The early life period is characterized by distinct molecular and cellular processes, defining a unique developmental window. Before weaning, TLRs levels and downstream signaling pathways differ significantly from those in adults. These differences help to regulate inflammatory responses to newly encountered microbes while promoting immune tolerance. In addition to variations in microbiota and intestinal compartments, composition and function of the intestinal immune system are uniquely adapted during early life. T cell populations, along with the balance between immune precursor structures and mature immune components, undergo significant changes around weaning, marking the transition toward an adult-like immune state. Such shift is also accompanied by the initiation of endogenous secretory IgA production, as maternal milk-derived SIgA are no longer delivered. TLR, toll-like receptor; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; IRAK, interleukin-1 receptorassociated kinase; SIgA, secretory immunoglobulin A; LTi, lymphoid tissue inducer
In addition to microbiome sensing by the host in early life, the response elicited by the neonatal immune system also drastically differs from adults. The early-life period has indeed been reported to be a specific window for the induction of tolerogenic regulatory T cells (TREG) directed toward microbiota members. Neonatal CD4+ T cells are more prone than adult CD4+ T cells to differentiate into TREG cells upon stimulation by luminal antigen in the colon [49, 50], making the early-life period a specific and crucial time for tolerance induction towards commensals. This phenomenon has also been observed in humans, as the effectiveness of peanut sensitization trials—designed to induce a tolerogenic response to peanut allergens and reduce the development of peanut allergies—has been shown to be highly dependent on the child’s age at the time of intervention [51, 52]. The greatest reduction in allergy development was observed in younger children, with the protective effect diminishing as the intervention was conducted at older ages [52]. This trend suggests that older children may have a reduced capacity to develop long-term tolerance to the exposed antigens [52]. The early-life mucosal T cell compartment is biased toward TH2 response, which is promoted by natural killer T (NKT) cells [53], with IFNɣ-producing TH1 and IL-17-producing TH17 cells, only observed after weaning (Fig. 1) [54]. Such TH2-bias is inhibited by the intestinal microbiome, with the TH1 to TH2 balance being reversed toward adult-like balance upon weaning as the microbiome becomes more complex (Fig. 1). Prior to weaning, a majority of T cells in the early-life intestine remains immature throughout the postnatal period, which is highly dependent on both TREG and maternal secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) [55, 56]. Such suppressive mechanisms to prevent inflammation during the early-life period also relies on the high abundance of erythroid CD71+ cells, which suppress myeloid and lymphoid cell activation in the intestine following bacterial colonization [57]. Humoral immunity specificities during the early-life period also contribute to the promotion of microbiome development. While B cells populate the intestine during the postnatal phase, functional IgA-producing plasma cells only emerge after weaning, after the first year of life in humans (Fig. 1) [58–60]. This delayed maturation of antibody-secreting B cells is both compensated for and regulated by luminal SIgA derived from maternal milk [58, 60], which play an active role in microbiome development. Hence, the early-life mucosal immune system is strongly inclined toward tolerance and hypo-responsiveness, minimizing inflammation in response to initial colonization in order to foster the development of a stable microbiome.
Host-microbiome interactions during the early-life period: the central role played by colonic goblet cells
The neonatal delicate balance between commensals sensing while preventing dissemination of potentially harmful bacteria is further supported through strict control of mucosal immune cells exposure to luminal antigens. Timely regulated mechanisms for antigen translocations through goblet cells in the colon have resulted in the identification of different antigen-exposure phases, which frame the early-life window of opportunity for tolerance (Fig. 2). As described in an elegant study by Knoop et al. such phases correspond in mice to:
Fig. 2.
Goblet-cell-mediated regulation of host-microbiota communication during the early-life period. Goblet cell associated antigen passages (GAPs) are tightly regulated by maternal milk-derived EGFR ligands and microbial signals via the MyD88 adaptor protein. This regulation defines three distinct phases for luminal antigens—originating from microbiota or diet—to traffic from the lumen to the lamina propria, where they are encountered by intestinal immune cells. As a result, in mice, GAPs are present in the colon only between day 10 and weaning, which coincides with early-life propensity for regulatory T cell induction, promoting long-lasting tolerance to microbial and dietary antigens. In MyD88-deficient mice or those with microbiota depletion due to antibiotic treatment or germ-free conditions, GAP levels are impaired after weaning. Areas framed by dashed lines represent hypothetical deductions that require further investigation. GAP, goblet cell–-associated antigen passage; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88
-
i.
No luminal antigen encountered in the small intestine nor colon between birth and 10 days of life.
-
ii.
Antigens encountered exclusively by the colonic immune system until weaning.
-
iii.
Antigens encountered exclusively in the small intestine postweaning (Fig. 2) [39].
Such antigen availability appears to be mediated by its trafficking through goblet cell associated antigen passages (GAPs), which are tightly timely regulated [39, 61, 62]. GAPs are formed through acetylcholine (ACh)-dependent endocytic events, facilitating the transcytotic delivery of luminal fluid-phase components across the cell [61–65]. In goblet cells, ACh signaling is inhibited by the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In the intestine, such inhibition can occur either through the intrinsic sensing of gut microbial products via goblet cells TLRs or by the presence of EGFR ligands in the lumen [61, 62]. Consequently, during the early life period, GAP formation is suppressed for the first 10 days due to EGFR activation by ligands derived from maternal milk (Fig. 2) [39, 63, 66]. As the concentration of EGF ligands in maternal milk declines, ACh signaling becomes sufficient to induce GAP formation in the colon but not in the small intestine (Fig. 2). This allows for selective luminal antigen translocation between day 10 and weaning. Upon weaning, the introduction of solid food leads to a surge in bacterial load, triggering TLR stimulation in goblet cells and subsequent Myd88-dependent EGFR activation in the colon (Fig. 2) [39, 63, 64]. This marks the end of luminal antigen trafficking through goblet cells in the colon. However, in the SI, GAPs open due to the cessation of maternal milk intake, facilitating antigen translocation in this region (Fig. 2) [39]. Disruption of Myd88 signaling—whether through Myd88 depletion (Myd88−/− mice), antibiotic treatment, or germ-free status—has been reported to result in the persistence of colonic GAPs into adulthood (Fig. 2) [39, 61, 64, 65], highlighting the importance of precise regulation of host-microbiome interaction through this route during the early-life period.
Maternal modulation of microbiome development
During pregnancy, the mother significantly influences the developing fetus in a way that ultimately impacts microbiome development after birth. Indeed, in utero immune priming has been observed in offspring from transiently-colonized dams compared to offspring originating from germ free dams [67, 68]. This was associated with the capacity of maternal microbiome to influence the fetus during pregnancy though IgG-bound microbiome-derived antigen crossing the placental barrier to prime fetal immune cells [67], as well as SCFA influencing cell differentiation through binding of SCFA receptors on embryonic cells [68]. Such immune priming results in changes of expression in genes involved in antimicrobial peptides activity, mucus secretion, and innate immune response, all known to impact intestinal microbiome development. In addition to in utero influences, the nursing period also represents a critical window during which maternal factors are shaping the offspring’s microbiome. Although prenatal maternal perturbations—such as stress, diet, or antibiotic treatment—have been reported to affect the microbiome and immune development of the offsprings, comparative studies involving pre- and postnatal antibiotic exposure, as well as cross-fostering experiments (where newborn mice are transferred to a different nursing dam at birth), indicated that the offspring’s microbiome more closely resembles that of the nursing dam rather than their biological mother [22, 69–71]. Moreover, disruptions in the nursing dam’s microbiome, rather than that of the birth mother, have been associated with altered microbiome development and impaired immune development in the offspring [22]. These findings importantly suggest that maternal influence during the nursing period may outweigh in utero/perinatal factors in shaping long-term health outcomes [70, 72], also both contributing to microbiome and health of the next generation, as previously reviewed [73].
Direct strain transfer as maternal contribution to offspring’s microbiota
As the mother constitutes the first source of bacterial strains for offsprings in mammals, many studies have reported the significant similarities between maternal and offspring microbiota composition. It was for example previously reported that strains are shared between a mother and her child [15, 74–77], with the transmission rate of strains, calculated as the amount of strains found in both mother and child, being higher between them than with unrelated mother, father, or individuals living in the same household in early-life [15, 74, 78], but not later, suggesting microbiota transfer between both parents and children after early infancy [77]. Such transgenerational microbiota transmission appears to be more effective in early life and diminishes as children grow and develop their own, personalized and adult-like, microbiota [79]. This suggests that maternal influence is particularly significant during the early stages of microbiota development. Hence, strains transmission, in addition from shared genetic and similar environment, results in infant’s fecal microbiota composition to be significantly more similar to that of its own mother than to that of other mothers over the entire first year of life [38], which may in part result from maternal strains persistence during the first year of life [77]. However, it is important to note that such strain transmission efficiency is highly impacted by birth mode, with maternal contribution to infant’s microbiota in C-section delivered-babies being significantly lower [38, 76], promoting the colonization of non-gut bacteria [77], which highlight the important role of delivery-associated strain transmission in maternal contribution to offspring’s microbiota. Complementary to this initial colonization, maternal breast milk microbiota also contributes to strain transfer across generations. Indeed, through daily consumption of approximately 800 mL of maternal milk, infants ingest between 105 and 107 bacteria per day, representing a non-negligeable input of bacterial strains (Fig. 3) [80]. The human breast milk comprises nine predominant genera—Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Serratia, Pseudomonas, Corynebacterium, Ralstonia, Propionibacterium, Sphingomonas, and Bradyrhizobium—which collectively account for approximately half of the microbial community in milk [80]. However, their relative abundance varies across individuals and lactation period [81–84]. It is also important to note that the low microbial biomass in breast milk drive significant challenges for the study of milk-associated bacteria, since many of the identified bacterial taxa are often indistinguishable from environmental and skin contaminants [85]. In a study investing milk microbiota contribution to infants microbiota in a cohort of 34 mother–infant dyads, Laursen et al. reported that 1/3 and 1/5 of the bacterial taxa detected in infant’s feces were shared with the corresponding mother’s milk at 5 and 9 months of age, respectively, with Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Bifidobacterium spp. among the most frequently shared [83]. Of note, these findings have to be interpreted carefully as bacteria identification was assessed leveraging 16S rRNA gene sequencing, preventing formal identification of shared strains between milk and the infant’s microbiota.
Fig. 3.
Impact of maternal milk components on microbiota establishment. Maternal milk plays a crucial role in the development of the offspring's microbiota, providing a range of components that influence bacterial growth and colonization. It contributes to the infant’s microbiota by supplying bacteria, SIgA, HMOs, nutrients, and immune factors, which together promote or inhibit the expansion of specific bacterial populations through both direct and indirect mechanisms. The interplay of these factors shapes the overall development of the microbiota in the offspring. SIgA, secretory immunoglobulin A; HMOs, human milk oligosaccharides; miRNA, microRNA; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor
Human milk oligosaccharides and microbiome development
In addition to providing a source for bacterial strains, maternal milk also contains an array of nutritive and immune components that have been reported to directly influence microbiome development of the next generation. Among these components are human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), which constitute the third largest nutrient fraction of breast milk, comprising 5–20 g/L in mature milk [83]. HMOs can reach the intestinal tract undigested, becoming available as substrates for the growth of specific gut microbes (Fig. 3). Studies investigating correlations between the HMO profile of ingested milk and microbiome composition in children have observed that several of the most abundant genera detected at 5 months of age correlate with the relative abundances of select HMOs [83, 86]. This suggests that HMOs can directly impact microbiome composition by favoring bacterial strains capable of degrading and using HMOs as an energy source. In addition, HMO can function as soluble receptors [87] or modify cell-surface glycans [88, 89], thereby modulating the attachment of specific bacteria to intestinal epithelial cells in a strain-dependent manner [89–93]. HMO’s impact on infants’ microbiome composition and function can be illustrated with the example of Bifidobacterium longum, which is consistently present in infants'microbiome. However, strain-level analysis has revealed consistent subspecies replacement patterns associated with lifestyle and age, but also breastfeeding practices, and which are characterized by changes in HMO-degrading capabilities [14, 29, 83, 94–97]. Variation in the presence of genes encoding enzymes required for HMO degradation versus dietary substrates in the genomes of B. longum subspecies provide it with different advantages in colonizing the gut of breastfed vs formula-fed children, as well as throughout the early-life period and the introduction of solid food at weaning [94–96]. As an example, subspecies of Bifidobacterium longum, such as B. longum subspecies longum or infantis, differ in their genomic capacity to use HMO or food-derived substrates, leading to B. longum subspecies infantis being associated with breastfed children [14, 29, 83, 94, 95, 98]. Based on genetic investigations, B. longum subsp. infantis is particularly adapted to use HMOs, while B. longum subsp. longum and breve tends to colonize later in life, as breast milk intake decreases and solid foods are introduced [14, 29, 83, 94, 95]. Additionally, a transitional B. longum subspecies has been identified, which harbor the genetic material allowing the use of both HMOs and food-derived substrates, leading to its expansion during the weaning period [94]. Notably, this transitional subspecies, as well as other B. breve subspecies, have been predominantly observed in samples from non-industrialized countries, underscoring the influence of environmental and lifestyle factors—beyond maternal determinants—on microbiome development [96, 97].
Milk-derived secretory IgA
Mother’s milk SIgA delivered to infants during breastfeeding are crucial in shaping and modulating immature infants’ microbiome (Fig. 3). The highest concentration of SIgA is reported in milk produced shortly after birth (days 2–5, with approximately 2.5 g/L), and subsequently slightly decline through time to reach approximately 0.7 g/L in mature milk around 30 days after birth [99]. In preparation for lactation, IgA-secreting plasma cells are recruited to the mammary gland. Gut plasma cells have a higher propensity to migrate toward mammary glands, thus providing the milk with IgA specific for antigen found in the maternal microbiome [56, 100–102]. Epithelial cells within the mammary glands express pIgR, enabling secretion of the full SIgA molecule directly into the milk [103]. As a result, the IgA repertoire of milk SIgA and maternal intestinal SIgA share more similarities than repertoires from other body sites. Upon weaning, plasma cells accumulation declines rapidly in the mammary gland. Hence, through milk ingestion, the infant's microbiome is exposed to a wide array of SIgA, which modulates the expansion and function of specific microbiota members, with various mechanisms at play. Briefly, SIgA can induce bacterial agglutination or neutralization, can provide an additional carbon source, and can facilitate bacterial adherence, altogether exerting a major shaping force on the developing microbiome [104, 105]. It is important to note that human milk is a major source of SIgA in early life, as infants have very low levels of their own IgA at birth and it only gradually rises in the first few months of life when the immune system develops [56, 60, 106, 107]. This is further evidenced by the significantly decreased proportion of fecal IgA in formula-fed young children compared to age-matched breastfed infants [108]. Considering the ability of SIgA to modulate bacterial strains colonization, absence of maternal SIgA in the gut of formula-fed children is suspected to contribute to the observed microbiome differences between these children.
Other milk-derived compounds influencing the infant’s microbiome development
Many other milk-derived components have been suggested to have an impact on the developing microbiome. This is the case for macronutrients, including lipids, proteins and carbohydrates (Fig. 3). While most of these components are absorbed in the small intestine, sparse evidences suggest that they could nonetheless influence microbiota composition through inhibitory activities, or serve as selective substrates for the growth of specific bacteria [109–112]. Moreover, maternal milk comprises many immune factors in addition to SIgA that were associated with changes in the infant’s microbiome (Fig. 3). This comprise lactoferrin, that has a direct cytotoxic effect against a large panel of microorganisms [113], lysozyme able to lyse gram positive bacteria [114, 115], as well as cytokines and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands influencing the infant’s immune system, thus indirectly impacting the microbiome [116–118]. In addition, breast milk also contained immune complement components that were shown to directly lyse specific members of gram-positive gut commensal microbiota [119]. More recently, significant associations have been observed between milk miRNA and infants microbiota members abundance, suggesting that milk-derived miRNA may also contribute to modulate offsprings’ microbiota development [120]. While these correlations do not establish a causal relationship between milk-derived miRNAs and the offspring’s microbiota, recent studies have reported gene expression modulation in both cell lines and bacteria when milk-derived miRNAs were supplemented to the culture media [121, 122]. These findings interestingly suggest a potential direct effect of milk-derived miRNAs on both the host and its microbiota, although the underlying mechanism(s) will require further investigation. It is important to note that maternal milk composition is highly individual, as it is influenced by numerous factors including diet [123–125]. Additionally, milk composition changes as time progresses after birth, altogether further increasing the complexity of how milk modulates the microbiota of the next generation.
Maternal environment shapes the offspring’s microbiome development
As a result of the complex maternal regulation of an infant’s microbiome—through mechanisms such as bacterial seeding and milk component impact on offspring intestinal bacterial communities—recent evidences highlighted the impact of maternal environmental factors and health on the offspring’s microbiome. This is the case for associations between maternal health status and microbiome in the offspring. Indeed, association have been found between maternal body mass index [124, 126, 127] or gestational diabetes [72, 128, 129] with microbiota specific composition and development patterns both in mice and human studies. Moreover, maternal exposure to antibiotic treatment has also been described as having a significant impact on offspring microbiota development, with microbiota of offspring from antibiotic exposed mother harboring significant differences in composition and diversity [130–132].
More recently, accumulating evidence points to a significant impact played by maternal diet on offspring’s microbiome, as summarized in Table 1. Dietary fiber intake, widely recognized in the literature for its strong influence on microbiome composition and metabolic activity, has been reported to shape distinct microbiome signatures in offspring from mothers exposed to fiber deprivation. A study by Zou et al. reported, in mice, that offspring born to mothers consuming a low-fiber low-fat diet or a low-fiber high-fat diet during lactation exhibited microbiota composition distinct from those of offspring from dams fed a control diet. This effect was primarily driven by fiber deprivation rather than the fat content of the diet [23]. Of note, the impact of maternal dietary fiber intake on infant microbiome and subsequent health in the human population is currently being investigated within the FeFiFo-MOMS study, which involves 135 healthy women recruited in early-pregnancy up to 18 month after birth, who are randomly assigned to four diet arms [133]. Given the previously discussed importance of host-microbiome interactions during early life, the microbiome’s ability to stimulate host innate receptors appears as a crucial aspect to consider when evaluating early-life microbiota development. In a recent study, we for example reported that maternal consumption of dietary emulsifiers—food additives previously shown to disrupt the microbiome in a way that enhances its pro-inflammatory potential [134–137]—in mice is sufficient to lead to increased microbiota-derived flagellin, as well as bacterial encroachment into the mucus layer in the offsprings at weaning, alongside with compositional changes. This suggests that microbiota function, particularly its ability to stimulate the host immune system, may be strongly influenced by maternal diet [22]. Additionally, maternal diet has been shown to alter maternal milk composition, as reviewed by others [82, 125], suggesting that the impact of maternal diet on offspring microbiome likely arises from a combination of multiple factors.
Table 1.
Maternal diet on offspring’s microbiome
| Maternal diet | Species | Study design | Impact on offspring’s early-life microbiome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber deprivation | Mouse (C57Bl/6) | Lactating dams fed low-fiber diet | Reduced ɑ-diversity; increased abundance of Proteobacteria; increased bacterial penetration in inner colonic layer | [23] |
| Mouse (C57Bl/6) | Dams fed low-fiber diet during gestation and nursing period | Shift in β-diversity, lower fecal SCFA levels | [166] | |
| Mouse (Swiss Webster) | Dams colonized with minimal microbiota fed fiber-free diet | Delayed colonization with mucin-degrading Akkermansia muciniphila | [24] | |
| Calories restriction | Mouse (C57Bl/6) | 30% maternal calorie restriction during the second half of gestation | Shift in β-diversity, decreased relative abundance of Akkermansia and Sutterella; increase in Anaerostipes and Paraprevotella | [198] |
| Grain-based diet | Mouse (C57Bl/6) | Maternal grain-based vs purified diet during lactation | Shift in β-diversity, higher relative abundance of Bacteroides and lower Faecalibaculum | [199] |
| High-fat diet | Human | Mothers whose intake of fat significantly differed from the mean were separated into a control group (n =13) and a high-fat group (n = 13) | Maternal high-fat diet associated with shift in β-diversity; enrichment of Enterococcus; reduction of Bacteroides | [200] |
| Mouse (C57Bl/6) | Dams fed high-fat diet | Increase in Firmicutes and Betaproteobacteria; decrease in Gammaproteobacteria | [170] | |
| Mouse (C57Bl/6) | Dams fed high-fat diet | Shift in β-diversity, reduced richness | [173, 174] | |
| Gluten-free diet | Mouse (NOD) | Dams fed gluten-free diet during gestation | Shift in β-diversity, enrichment in Akkermansia muciniphila | [201] |
| Dietary emulsifiers | Mouse (C57Bl6) | Dams exposed to dietary emulsifiers (CMC, P80) during pregnancy and nursing period | Shift in β-diversity, increase fecal flagellin load; increased bacterial penetration in inner colonic layer | [22] |
| Non-nutritive sweeteners | Mouse (C57Bl6) | Dams exposed to non-nutritive sweeteners (sucralose, acesulfame-K) during pregnancy and nursing period | Significant changes in β- and ɑ-diversity; increase in firmicutes and decrease in Akkermansia muciniphila; changes in fecal microbiota-derived metabolites | [177] |
Early-life microbiome perturbation results in lasting health consequences
Early-life microbiome perturbations promote non-reversible disease susceptibility in adulthood
Impairment in immunomodulatory microbial stimulation of host intestinal compartment has been reported to contribute to irreversible lifelong enhanced disease susceptibility [11, 138]. This was first suggested with the observation that while most abnormalities in germ-free animals can be reversed by intestinal colonization at any age, the ability to restore certain cellular defects that occur in the absence of microbiome is restricted to a short interval in early life, suggesting the existence of a window of opportunity [139]. Indeed, alterations of the early-life microbiome through antibiotics or germ-free conditions have been reported to increase susceptibility to a wide array of diseases, including colitis [17, 140–142], asthma and allergies [17, 143–145], autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis and type 1 diabetes [146, 147], as well as metabolic alterations [16, 148, 149]. Notably, deleterious health effects of early-life microbiome alterations appear to be highly sex-specific, with males and females exhibiting different long-term susceptibilities to diseases such as obesity, immune dysregulation, and neurological impairments [16, 150, 151]. However, colonization or restoration of a proper microbiome after the weaning period has been reported to not being sufficient to prevent such increased disease susceptibility in adulthood [16, 17, 53, 140]. This importantly suggests that long-term health depends on proper host-microbiome interactions during the early-life period. The lasting consequence of early-life microbiome perturbation involves multiple mechanisms, with T cell tolerization in early life playing a central role in sustaining long-term protection against disease development. For example, while colonizing germ-free mice during the critical window of opportunity was sufficient to prevent colitis susceptibility, microbiome restoration combined with TREG depletion failed to confer the same protection [17]. This suggests that early-life microbiome-induced TREG are crucial for maintaining health later in life [17, 39, 152]. Such microbiome-specific TREG induction have been described as a part of the first vigorous reaction of the host to its microbiome, characterized by a pick expression of Tnfa and Ifng, that is programmed to occur around weaning and is necessary for the normal development of the immune system [17]. In another study, artificial GAP closure in early life was reported to prevent the expansion of pTREG directed toward microbiota members, which was associated with lasting susceptibility to colitis [39]. Such pTREG induction could not be rescued upon colonic GAP opening in the post-weaning period [39], suggesting that it requires both microbiome-derived signals and the specific window of opportunity to occur.
Based on array of evidence originating from mice studies pointing at the potent impact of early-life microbiome perturbation on health, significant research efforts have focused on evaluating whether such early-life perturbated exposure to microbes were associated with susceptibility to disease later in life in human. First, several studies have highlighted the associated exposition to farm environment in childhood and the decreased susceptibility to IBD and allergic risk [153–155], also these studies did not control for genetic nor family history of disease. Moreover, antibiotics treatment during the first year of life was associated with increased susceptibility to a wide array of diseases, including asthma, eczema and allergies [156, 157], as well as IBD [20, 158–160] and metabolic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes [161, 162]. While having a more modest effect on the early-life microbiome compared to antibiotic treatment, C-section delivery was also associated with obesity, type 1 diabetes, Celiac disease, and allergy risk later in life [163–165]. However, the increased inter-individual heterogeneity that exist in the human population compared to mice studies, in addition to the difficulties to obtained samples and to follow subject over years, both prevent clear identification of the mechanisms and biological processes involved.
Maternal influence on offspring’s microbiome shapes lasting health consequences
With the mother playing a major role in shaping the offspring’s microbiome, as discussed above, the lasting impact of such perturbations warrants further attention. While these microbiome disruptions may be relatively minor compared to the effects of germ-free conditions or antibiotic treatment—both commonly used in mouse studies to model early-life microbiome perturbation—they can still have significant consequences. Maternal dietary fiber intake has been reported in multiple studies to influence offspring health. A low-fiber diet has been shown to promote offspring susceptibility to intestinal inflammation [23], diet-induced obesity [23], and severe lower respiratory infections [166], while maternal supplementation with β-glucan has demonstrated beneficial effects on offspring cognitive development [167]. In a human study involving 639 mother–infant pairs with a family history of allergic disease, Pretorius et al. reported an association between higher maternal intake of resistant starch and a reduced incidence of infant wheeze, after controlling for a range of environmental and demographic risk factors [168]. Increased maternal fat intake has been implicated in driving disease susceptibility in the next generation. Indeed, maternal high-fat diet has been linked to increased susceptibility to sepsis, food allergies, and autoimmune conditions [169], as well as intestinal inflammation [170–172] and neurological defect [173, 174]. In a US-based cohort of 349 mother–infant dyads, analysis leveraging multiple linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders revealed that maternal fat intake was associated with increased infant body fat percentage at 6 months of age [175]. However, this association was not observed in the Nurture study, an observational birth cohort from the Southeastern U.S. investigating the relationship between maternal diet and infant adiposity [176]. Such discrepancy highlights the challenges of assessing such associations, given the multiple factors influencing infant microbiome and health in the human population. These findings hence warrant further investigation, especially in humans, as fiber reduction and increased fat intake are central features of modern Western diet. Moreover, food additive consumption, another hallmark of modern dietary patterns, has been reported to have lasting consequences on offspring health. Maternal consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners has been associated with metabolic dysregulation in offspring [177], while dietary emulsifiers consumption has been linked to transgenerational disease susceptibility, including negative effects on neuropsychological health [178], low-grade intestinal inflammation, and increased susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis and diet-induced obesity [22]. However, mechanisms by which maternal diet influences the offspring’s microbiome and subsequent health remain poorly understood. In the study by Zou et al. antibiotic treatment in offspring from low-fiber-fed dams was sufficient to prevent increased susceptibility to diet-induced obesity, suggesting that the effects of maternal diet are mediated through lasting microbiome alterations [23]. In recent studies, including ours, a cross-fostering approach was sufficient to either prevent or transfer the long-term susceptibility to disease, indicating that in utero modulation by maternal diet may not be involved [22, 71]. These heterogeneous findings highlight the complexity of understanding how maternal diet impacts offspring microbiome and health. Multiple mechanisms, potentially synergistic or diet-specific, may be at play, including (i) direct in utero effects of the maternal diet, (ii) in utero influences of the maternal microbiome, (iii) postnatal transmission of maternal microbiome and modulation via breast milk, (iv) behavioral changes, and (v) offspring’s immune responsiveness to its microbiome. Given the widespread dietary shifts in modern societies, alongside with rising incidence in non-communicable diseases with a chronic inflammatory component, understanding these mechanisms responsible for maternal influences appears crucial to develop strategies to promote long-term health across generations.
Discussion
The early-life microbiome plays a pivotal role in shaping immune development and long-term health, with maternal influences serving as critical determinants of offspring microbiome composition and function. Perturbations in maternal microbiome due to dietary alterations can lead to lasting consequences, increasing offspring susceptibility to metabolic, inflammatory, and immune-related diseases. While associations between the maternal environment—including modulation of the microbiome—and offspring’s microbiome development and health have been extensively studied, causal relationships and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood and warrant further investigation. Moreover, recent studies highlight the individualized nature of microbiome responses to a given diet [179–181], with such inter-individual variation adding complexity to the transgenerational impact of maternal diet on the offspring’s microbiome and health. One emerging area of interest is the additional contribution of paternal microbiome to offspring health. Although maternal transmission remains dominant, recent studies suggest that paternal factors, including diet, may influence early-life microbial colonization and immune programming [78, 182–184]. Investigating the interplay between paternal and maternal microbiome could provide a more comprehensive understanding of early-life microbial inheritance and its functional consequences. Another key aspect requiring further exploration is the functional role played by the early-life microbiome beyond its taxonomical composition. While shifts in microbial communities have been linked to disease susceptibility, we, among others, reported that functional aspects, such as the pro-inflammatory potential of the early-life microbiome, are associated with poor health outcome [22, 185], while SCFA have been reported as crucial for TREG expansion [17]. Defining the specific impact of bacterial metabolism, mucin-degrading activity, and pro-inflammatory molecule synthesis in early life remains a challenge. However, addressing this will enhance our mechanistic understanding of host- microbiome interactions during this critical period.
Given the profound impact of early-life microbiome, targeted modulation strategies have gained interest as potential therapeutic interventions. Pre- and probiotic supplementation, as well as dietary intervention in mothers during the pregnancy and lactation periods, are promising avenues to impact neonatal microbiota composition in a beneficial manner [186–190]. Indeed, a study involving supplementation of gestating dams with B. longum reported that vertical transmission of this bacterium provided offspring with protection against inflammation susceptibility [186]. Similarly, supplementation with L. rhamnosus in rats was sufficient to confer beneficial metabolic effects on the offspring, protecting them from the adverse consequences of a maternal obesogenic diet [187]. In humans, maternal intake of B. lactis and L. rhamnosus has been shown to modulate TLR expression in the placenta [188], while study investigating maternal prebiotic supplementation reported significant differences in infant microbiota at one year of age [189]. However, the long-term effects on infant health—particularly in relation to allergy—remain to be assessed in future follow-up [189]. Results from these pilot studies nonetheless suggest that the efficacy of probiotic interventions may be strain-specific and context-dependent, altogether pointing toward the need for further research into strain selection, timing, different populations as well as long-term impacts. In addition, an innovative approach to modulate infant microbiome involves the use of maternal factors or modifying infant formula composition to better mimic the microbial and metabolic cues provided by maternal milk. This approach was investigated by Holst et al. who performed a clinical study on infant formula supplemented with five different HMOs [191]. Such intervention resulted in a shift of infant microbiome both at the composition and functional level closer to that of breastfed infants, suggesting beneficial effects, also the lasting impact remains to be investigated. An other approach involves the supplementation of formula milk with probiotic, which have been reported to efficiently modulate microbiome’ composition and function in infant receiving such formula [192–194]. Altogether, these approaches appear promising for infant’s microbiome modulation, but the long-term beneficial effects on health, as well as the precise identification of microbial species and functions involved in early-life mechanisms that promote lasting health, require further characterization to refine such preventive strategies.
To conclude, the accumulating evidences discussed above underscore the profound influence played by the maternal environment on shaping an infant’s microbiome and subsequent health. While further studies are needed to develop therapeutic strategies leveraging this route for microbiome modulation, a deeper mechanistic understanding of transgenerational microbiome perturbations in early life remains essential to elucidate their contribution to disease etiology. The widespread use of food additives, increased fat and reduced fiber content in modern diets may contribute to transgenerational shifts in microbiome composition and function, potentially influencing offspring health and playing a role in the rise of non-communicable inflammatory diseases observed over recent decades. Notably, as major dietary shifts toward modern diet emerged in the 1970 s [195, 196], the current generation is experiencing (i) direct exposure to modern diets and their associated adverse health effects, cumulated with (ii) potential transgenerational influences stemming from parental consumption of such diets. Distinct phenotypes have already been reported between the first generation exposed and the second generation, which experiences both direct exposure and potential transgenerational effects in a cumulative manner [197]. This importantly suggests that such interactions may significantly shape the health status of the present generation. Therefore, understanding these environmental pressures appears crucial for developing public health strategies aimed at preserving beneficial microbial ecosystems during early life and mitigating the long-term health consequences of modern dietary patterns.
Abbreviations
- NCD
Non-communicable diseases
- IBD
Inflammatory bowel disease
- SCFA
Short-chain fatty acid
- TEDDY
The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young
- PRR
Pathogen recognition receptors
- TLR
Toll-like receptor
- IRAK
IL-1 receptor-associated kinase
- NKT
Natural killer T
- GAP
Goblet cell associated antigen passage
- Ach
Acetylcholine
- EGFR
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- HMOs
Human milk oligosaccharides
- IgA
Immunoglobulin A
- AhR
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor
Authors’ contributions
CD and BC conducted the literature search, extracted and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
Benoit Chassaing’s laboratory is supported by a Starting Grant (grant agreement Invaders No. ERC-2018-StG-804135) and a Consolidator Grant (grant agreement InterBiome No. ERC-2024-CoG-101170920) from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, ANR grants EMULBIONT (ANR-21-CE15-0042–01) and DREAM (ANR-20-PAMR-0002), région Ile-de-France DIM One Health-DOH 2.0, DIM BioConvS, the national program “Microbiote” from INSERM, grant from the AFA Crohn RCH France and from the French government through the France 2030 investment plan managed by the National Research Agency (ANR), as part of the ANR 23 IAHU 0012.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
Benoit Chassaing is an Associate Editor of Microbiome, and played no part in the peer review of this manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Sun X, Yon DK, Nguyen TT, Tanisawa K, Son K, Zhang L, et al. Dietary and other lifestyle factors and their influence on non-communicable diseases in the Western Pacific region. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific. 2024;43: 100842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li W, Qiu X, Ma H, Geng Q. Incidence and long-term specific mortality trends of metabolic syndrome in the United States. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886893/. Cited 2024 Jun 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:46-54.e42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Patterson CC, Karuranga S, Salpea P, Saeedi P, Dahlquist G, Soltesz G, et al. Worldwide estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2019;157:107842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gillespie KM, Bain SC, Barnett AH, Bingley PJ, Christie MR, Gill GV, et al. The rising incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes and reduced contribution of high-risk HLA haplotypes. Lancet. 2004;364:1699–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gregory GA, Robinson TIG, Linklater SE, Wang F, Colagiuri S, De Beaufort C, et al. Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10:741–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, Kaye W, Leray E, Marrie RA, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler. 2020;26:1816–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Phelps NH, Singleton RK, Zhou B, Heap RA, Mishra A, Bennett JE, et al. Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. The Lancet. 2024;403:1027–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boutari C, Mantzoros CS. A 2022 update on the epidemiology of obesity and a call to action: as its twin COVID-19 pandemic appears to be receding, the obesity and dysmetabolism pandemic continues to rage on. Metabolism. 2022;133: 155217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu D, Jin Y, Xing Y, Abate MD, Abbasian M, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence of six major immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. eClinicalMedicine. 2023;64:102193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Torow N, Hornef MW. The neonatal window of opportunity: setting the stage for life-long host-microbial interaction and immune homeostasis. Journal of Immunology. 2017;198:557–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gollwitzer ES, Marsland B. Impact of early-life exposures on immune maturation and susceptibility to disease. Trends Immunol. 2015;36:684–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bindels LB, Watts JEM, Theis KR, Carrion VJ, Ossowicki A, Seifert J, et al. A blueprint for contemporary studies of microbiomes. Microbiome. 2025;13(95):s40168-025-02091–0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bäckhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, Feng Q, Jia H, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:690–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Valles-Colomer M, Blanco-Míguez A, Manghi P, Asnicar F, Dubois L, Golzato D, et al. The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes. Nature. 2023;614:125–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cox LM, Yamanishi S, Sohn J, Alekseyenko AV, Leung JM, Cho I, et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences. Cell. 2014;158:705–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Al Nabhani Z, Dulauroy S, Marques R, Cousu C, Al Bounny S, Déjardin F, et al. A weaning reaction to microbiota is required for resistance to immunopathologies in the adult. Immunity. 2019;50:1276-1288.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science. 2016;352:539–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hoskinson C, Petersen C, Turvey SE. How the early life microbiome shapes immune programming in childhood asthma and allergies. Mucosal Immunol. 2025;18(1):26–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Agrawal M, Poulsen G, Colombel J-F, Allin KH, Jess T. Maternal antibiotic exposure during pregnancy and risk of IBD in offspring: a population-based cohort study. Gut. 2023;72:804–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cabrera-Rubio R, Pickett-Nairne K, González-Solares S, Collado MC, Venter C. The maternal diet index and offspring microbiota at 1 month of life: insights from the Mediterranean birth cohort MAMI. Nutrients. 2024;16: 314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Delaroque C, Bonazzi E, Huillet M, Ellero-Simatos S, Hao F, Patterson A, et al. Maternal diet alters offspring’s early life host-microbiota communication through goblet cells, resulting in long-lasting diseases susceptibility. 2024. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2024.07.05.602179. Cited 2024 Oct 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Zou J, Ngo VL, Wang Y, Wang Y, Gewirtz AT. Maternal fiber deprivation alters microbiota in offspring, resulting in low-grade inflammation and predisposition to obesity. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:45-57.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grant ET, Boudaud M, Muller A, Macpherson AJ, Desai MS. Maternal diet and gut microbiome composition modulate early-life immune development. EMBO Mol Med. 2023;15: e17241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Perez-Muñoz ME, Arrieta M-C, Ramer-Tait AE, Walter J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome. 2017;5:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rodríguez JM, Murphy K, Stanton C, Ross RP, Kober OI, Juge N, et al. The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microbial Ecology in Health, Disease. 2015;26:26050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Derrien M, Alvarez A-S, De Vos WM. The gut microbiota in the first decade of life. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27:997–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang X-A, Li J-P, Lee M-S, Yang S-F, Chang Y-S, Chen L, et al. A common trajectory of gut microbiome development during the first month in healthy neonates with limited inter-individual environmental variations. Sci Rep. 2024;14:3264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Selma-Royo M, Dubois L, Manara S, Armanini F, Cabrera-Rubio R, Valles-Colomer M, et al. Birthmode and environment-dependent microbiota transmission dynamics are complemented by breastfeeding during the first year. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32:996-1010.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Koenig JE, Spor A, Scalfone N, Fricker AD, Stombaugh J, Knight R, et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4578–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O’Brien JL, Hutchinson DS, Smith DP, Wong MC, et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature. 2018;562:583–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beller L, Deboutte W, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Tito RY, Valles-Colomer M, et al. Successional stages in infant gut microbiota maturation. 2021;12(6):e0185721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Peterson D, Bonham KS, Rowland S, Pattanayak CW, Klepac-Ceraj V. Comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene and metagenome sequencing in pediatric gut microbiomes. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 670336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fernández-Pato A, Sinha T, Gacesa R, Andreu-Sánchez S, Gois MFB, Gelderloos-Arends J, et al. Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analyses. Sci Rep. 2024;14:3911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gemmell MR, Jayawardana T, Koentgen S, Brooks E, Kennedy N, Berry S, et al. Optimised human stool sample collection for multi-omic microbiota analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:16816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bokulich NA, Chung J, Battaglia T, Henderson N, Jay M, Li H, et al. Antibiotics, birth mode, and diet shape microbiome maturation during early life. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8. Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7121. Cited 2024 May 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Selma-Royo M, Calatayud Arroyo M, García-Mantrana I, Parra-Llorca A, Escuriet R, Martínez-Costa C, et al. Perinatal environment shapes microbiota colonization and infant growth: impact on host response and intestinal function. Microbiome. 2020;8:167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reyman M, Van Houten MA, Van Baarle D, Bosch AATM, Man WH, Chu MLJN, et al. Impact of delivery mode-associated gut microbiota dynamics on health in the first year of life. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Knoop KA, Gustafsson JK, McDonald KG, Kulkarni DH, Coughlin PE, McCrate S, et al. Microbial antigen encounter during a preweaning interval is critical for tolerance to gut bacteria. Sci Immunol. 2017;2: eaao1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brook B, Harbeson D, Ben-Othman R, Viemann D, Kollmann TR. Newborn susceptibility to infection vs. disease depends on complex in vivo interactions of host and pathogen. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:615–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Adeniyi-Ipadeola GO, Hankins JD, Kambal A, Zeng XL, Patil K, Poplaski V, et al. Infant and adult human intestinal enteroids are morphologically and functionally distinct. Coyne CB, editor. mBio. 2024;15:e01316-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pott J, Stockinger S, Torow N, Smoczek A, Lindner C, McInerney G, et al. Age-dependent TLR3 expression of the intestinal epithelium contributes to rotavirus susceptibility. Sigal LJ, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kollmann TR, Crabtree J, Rein-Weston A, Blimkie D, Thommai F, Wang XY, et al. Neonatal innate TLR-mediated responses are distinct from those of adults. J Immunol. 2009;183:7150–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fulde M, Sommer F, Chassaing B, van Vorst K, Dupont A, Hensel M, et al. Neonatal selection by Toll-like receptor 5 influences long-term gut microbiota composition. Nature. 2018;560:489–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Malmuthuge N. Regional and age dependent changes in gene expression of toll-like receptors and key antimicrobial defence molecules throughout the gastrointestinal tract of dairy calves. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2012;146(1):18-26. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Price AE, Shamardani K, Lugo KA, Deguine J, Roberts AW, Lee BL, et al. A map of toll-like receptor expression in the intestinal epithelium reveals distinct spatial, cell type-specific, and temporal patterns. Immunity. 2018;49:560-575.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ulas T, Pirr S, Fehlhaber B, Bickes MS, Loof TG, Vogl T, et al. S100-alarmin-induced innate immune programming protects newborn infants from sepsis. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:622–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chassin C, Kocur M, Pott J, Duerr CU, Gütle D, Lotz M, et al. miR-146a mediates protective innate immune tolerance in the neonate intestine. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8:358–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang G, Miyahara Y, Guo Z, Khattar M, Stepkowski SM, Chen W. “Default” generation of neonatal regulatory T cells. Journal of Immunology. 2010;185:71–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lubin J-B, Green J, Maddux S, Denu L, Duranova T, Lanza M, et al. Arresting microbiome development limits immune system maturation and resistance to infection in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:554-570.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Logan K, Bahnson HT, Ylescupidez A, Beyer K, Bellach J, Campbell DE, et al. Early introduction of peanut reduces peanut allergy across risk groups in pooled and causal inference analyses. Allergy. 2023;78:1307–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Roberts G, Bahnson HT, Du Toit G, O’Rourke C, Sever ML, Brittain E, et al. Defining the window of opportunity and target populations to prevent peanut allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2023;151:1329–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.An D, Oh SF, Olszak T, Neves JF, Avci FY, Erturk-Hasdemir D, et al. Sphingolipids from a symbiotic microbe regulate homeostasis of host intestinal natural killer T cells. Cell. 2014;156:123–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Torow N, Hand TW, Hornef MW. Programmed and environmental determinants driving neonatal mucosal immune development. Immunity. 2023;56:485–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Torow N, Yu K, Hassani K, Freitag J, Schulz O, Basic M, et al. Active suppression of intestinal CD4+TCRαβ+ T-lymphocyte maturation during the postnatal period. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Koch MA, Reiner GL, Lugo KA, Kreuk LSM, Stanbery AG, Ansaldo E, et al. Maternal IgG and IgA antibodies dampen mucosal T helper cell responses in early life. Cell. 2016;165:827–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Elahi S, Ertelt JM, Kinder JM, Jiang TT, Zhang X, Xin L, et al. Immunosuppressive CD71+ erythroid cells compromise neonatal host defence against infection. Nature. 2013;504:158–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Harris NL, Spoerri I, Schopfer JF, Nembrini C, Merky P, Massacand J, et al. Mechanisms of neonatal mucosal antibody protection. J Immunol. 2006;177:6256–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lindner C, Wahl B, Föhse L, Suerbaum S, Macpherson AJ, Prinz I, et al. Age, microbiota, and T cells shape diverse individual IgA repertoires in the intestine. J Exp Med. 2012;209:365–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rogier EW, Frantz AL, Bruno MEC, Wedlund L, Cohen DA, Stromberg AJ, et al. Secretory antibodies in breast milk promote long-term intestinal homeostasis by regulating the gut microbiota and host gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:3074–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Knoop KA, McDonald KG, McCrate S, McDole JR, Newberry RD. Microbial sensing by goblet cells controls immune surveillance of luminal antigens in the colon. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8:198–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gustafsson JK, Davis JE, Rappai T, McDonald KG, Kulkarni DH, Knoop KA, et al. Intestinal goblet cells sample and deliver lumenal antigens by regulated endocytic uptake and transcytosis. eLife. 2021;10:e67292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Knoop KA, Coughlin PE, Floyd AN, Ndao IM, Hall-Moore C, Shaikh N, et al. Maternal activation of the EGFR prevents translocation of gut-residing pathogenic Escherichia coli in a model of late-onset neonatal sepsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:7941–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Knoop KA, McDonald KG, Kulkarni DH, Newberry RD. Antibiotics promote inflammation through the translocation of native commensal colonic bacteria. Gut. 2016;65:1100–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Knoop KA, Gustafsson JK, McDonald KG, Kulkarni DH, Kassel R, Newberry RD. Antibiotics promote the sampling of luminal antigens and bacteria via colonic goblet cell associated antigen passages. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:400–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Knoop KA, McDonald KG, Coughlin PE, Kulkarni DH, Gustafsson JK, Rusconi B, et al. Synchronization of mothers and offspring promotes tolerance and limits allergy. JCI Insight. 2020;5: e137943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gomez De Agüero M, Ganal-Vonarburg SC, Fuhrer T, Rupp S, Uchimura Y, Li H, et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science. 2016;351:1296–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kimura I, Miyamoto J, Ohue-Kitano R, Watanabe K, Yamada T, Onuki M, et al. Maternal gut microbiota in pregnancy influences offspring metabolic phenotype in mice. Science. 2020;367: eaaw8429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nyangahu DD, Lennard KS, Brown BP, Darby MG, Wendoh JM, Havyarimana E, et al. Disruption of maternal gut microbiota during gestation alters offspring microbiota and immunity. Microbiome. 2018;6:124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Daft JG, Ptacek T, Kumar R, Morrow C, Lorenz RG. Cross-fostering immediately after birth induces a permanent microbiota shift that is shaped by the nursing mother. Microbiome. 2015;3:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lian V, Hinrichs H, Young M, Faerber A, Özler O, Xie Y, et al. Maternal obesogenic diet attenuates microbiome-dependent offspring weaning reaction with worsening of steatotic liver disease. Am J Pathol. 2024;194:209–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Xue C, Xie Q, Zhang C, Hu Y, Song X, Jia Y, et al. Vertical transmission of the gut microbiota influences glucose metabolism in offspring of mice with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Microbiome. 2022;10:122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jašarević E, Bale TL. Prenatal and postnatal contributions of the maternal microbiome on offspring programming. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019;55: 100797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ferretti P, Pasolli E, Tett A, Asnicar F, Gorfer V, Fedi S, et al. Mother-to-infant microbial transmission from different body sites shapes the developing infant gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:133-145.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Koo H, McFarland BC, Hakim JA, Crossman DK, Crowley MR, Rodriguez JM, et al. An individualized mosaic of maternal microbial strains is transmitted to the infant gut microbial community. R Soc open sci. 2020;7: 192200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bogaert D, Van Beveren GJ, De Koff EM, Lusarreta Parga P, Balcazar Lopez CE, Koppensteiner L, et al. Mother-to-infant microbiota transmission and infant microbiota development across multiple body sites. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:447-460.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Podlesny D, Fricke WF. Strain inheritance and neonatal gut microbiota development: a meta-analysis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2021;311: 151483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dubois L, Valles-Colomer M, Ponsero A, Helve O, Andersson S, Kolho K-L, et al. Paternal and induced gut microbiota seeding complement mother-to-infant transmission. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32:1011-1024.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Valles-Colomer M, Bacigalupe R, Vieira-Silva S, Suzuki S, Darzi Y, Tito RY, et al. Variation and transmission of the human gut microbiota across multiple familial generations. Nat Microbiol. 2021;7:87–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bianco I, Ferrara C, Romano F, Loperfido F, Sottotetti F, El Masri D, et al. The influence of maternal lifestyle factors on human breast milk microbial composition: a narrative review. Biomedicines. 2024;12: 2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Martínez-Oca P, Alba C, Sánchez-Roncero A, Fernández-Marcelo T, Martín MÁ, Escrivá F, et al. Maternal diet determines milk microbiome composition and offspring gut colonization in Wistar rats. Nutrients. 2023;15: 4322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Taylor R, Keane D, Borrego P, Arcaro K. Effect of maternal diet on maternal milk and breastfed infant gut microbiomes: a scoping review. Nutrients. 2023;15: 1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Laursen MF, Pekmez CT, Larsson MW, Lind MV, Yonemitsu C, Larnkjær A, et al. Maternal milk microbiota and oligosaccharides contribute to the infant gut microbiota assembly. ISME Communications. 2021;1:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Selma-Royo M, Calvo Lerma J, Cortés-Macías E, Collado MC. Human milk microbiome: from actual knowledge to future perspective. Semin Perinatol. 2021;45: 151450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Spreckels JE, Fernández-Pato A, Kruk M, Kurilshikov A, Garmaeva S, Sinha T, et al. Analysis of microbial composition and sharing in low-biomass human milk samples: a comparison of DNA isolation and sequencing techniques. ISME Communications. 2023;3:116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Borewicz K, Gu F, Saccenti E, Arts ICW, Penders J, Thijs C, et al. Correlating infant fecal microbiota composition and human milk oligosaccharide consumption by microbiota of 1-month-old breastfed infants. Molecular Nutrition Food Res. 2019;63:1801214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hassan AA, Wozniak JM, Vilen Z, Li W, Jadhav A, Parker CG, et al. Chemoproteomic mapping of human milk oligosaccharide (HMO) interactions in cells. RSC Chemical Biology. 2022;3:1369–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Angeloni S, Ridet JL, Kusy N, Gao H, Crevoisier F, Guinchard S, et al. Glycoprofiling with micro-arrays of glycoconjugates and lectins. Glycobiology. 2005;15:31–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Morrin ST, Lane JA, Marotta M, Bode L, Carrington SD, Irwin JA, et al. Bovine colostrum-driven modulation of intestinal epithelial cells for increased commensal colonisation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:2745–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Newburg DS. Neonatal protection by an innate immune system of human milk consisting of oligosaccharides and glycans. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:26–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kong C, De Jong A, De Haan BJ, Kok J, De Vos P. Human milk oligosaccharides and non-digestible carbohydrates reduce pathogen adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells by decoy effects or by attenuating bacterial virulence. Food Res Int. 2022;151: 110867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Piotrowski M, Wultańska D, Pituch H. The prebiotic effect of human milk oligosaccharides 3′- and 6′-sialyllactose on adhesion and biofilm formation by Clostridioides difficile—pilot study. Microbes Infect. 2022;24: 104929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Walsh C, Owens RA, Bottacini F, Lane JA, van Sinderen D, Hickey RM. HMO-primed bifidobacteria exhibit enhanced ability to adhere to intestinal epithelial cells. Front Microbiol. 2023;14. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232173/full. Cited 2025 May 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 94.Vatanen T, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, Tripathi S, Arthur TD, Vehik K, et al. The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature. 2018;562:589–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Pucci N, Ujčič-Voortman J, Verhoeff AP, Mende DR. Priority effects, nutrition and milk glycan-metabolic potential drive Bifidobacterium longum subspecies dynamics in the infant gut microbiome. PeerJ. 2025;13: e18602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Olm MR, Dahan D, Carter MM, Merrill BD, Yu FB, Jain S, et al. Robust variation in infant gut microbiome assembly across a spectrum of lifestyles. Science. 2022;376:1220–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vatanen T, Ang QY, Siegwald L, Sarker SA, Le Roy CI, Duboux S, et al. A distinct clade of Bifidobacterium longum in the gut of Bangladeshi children thrives during weaning. Cell. 2022;185:4280-4297.e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Taft DH, Lewis ZT, Nguyen N, Ho S, Masarweh C, Dunne-Castagna V, et al. Bifidobacterium species colonization in infancy: a global cross-sectional comparison by population history of breastfeeding. Nutrients. 2022;14: 1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Czosnykowska-Łukacka M, Lis-Kuberka J, Królak-Olejnik B, Orczyk-Pawiłowicz M. Changes in human milk immunoglobulin profile during prolonged lactation. Front Pediatr. 2020;8: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Usami K, Niimi K, Matsuo A, Suyama Y, Sakai Y, Sato S, et al. The gut microbiota induces Peyer’s-patch-dependent secretion of maternal IgA into milk. Cell Rep. 2021;36: 109655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Roux ME, McWilliams M, Phillips-Quagliata JM, Weisz-Carrington P, Lamm ME. Origin of IgA-secreting plasma cells in the mammary gland. J Exp Med. 1977;146:1311–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Lindner C, Thomsen I, Wahl B, Ugur M, Sethi MK, Friedrichsen M, et al. Diversification of memory B cells drives the continuous adaptation of secretory antibodies to gut microbiota. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:880–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.De Groot N, Van Kuik-Romeijn P, Lee SH, De Boer HA. Increased immunoglobulin A levels in milk by over-expressing the murine polymeric immunoglobulin receptor gene in the mammary gland epithelial cells of transgenic mice. Immunology. 2000;101:218–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Pabst O, Slack E. IgA and the intestinal microbiota: the importance of being specific. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Moor K, Diard M, Sellin ME, Felmy B, Wotzka SY, Toska A, et al. High-avidity IgA protects the intestine by enchaining growing bacteria. Nature. 2017;544:498–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Chong H-Y, Tan LT-H, Law JW-F, Hong K-W, Ratnasingam V, Ab Mutalib N-S, et al. Exploring the potential of human milk and formula milk on infants’ gut and health. Nutrients. 2022;14:3554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pandey U, Aich P. Postnatal intestinal mucosa and gut microbial composition develop hand in hand: a mouse study. Biomedical Journal. 2023;46: 100519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bridgman SL, Konya T, Azad MB, Sears MR, Becker AB, Turvey SE, et al. Infant gut immunity: a preliminary study of IgA associations with breastfeeding. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2016;7:68–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Sprong RC, Hulstein MF, Van der Meer R. Bactericidal activities of milk lipids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1298–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pieper R, Vahjen W, Zentek J. Intestinal lactose and mineral concentration affect the microbial ecophysiology along the gastrointestinal tract of formula-fed neonatal piglets. J Anim Sci. 2016;94:3786–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Jiang T, Liu B, Li J, Dong X, Lin M, Zhang M, et al. Association between sn-2 fatty acid profiles of breast milk and development of the infant intestinal microbiome. Food Funct. 2018;9:1028–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Mu C, Cai Z, Bian G, Du Y, Ma S, Su Y, et al. New insights into porcine milk N-glycome and the potential relation with offspring gut microbiome. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:1114–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Manzoni P, Rinaldi M, Cattani S, Pugni L, Romeo MG, Messner H, et al. Bovine lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of late-onset sepsis in very low-birth-weight neonates: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302:1421–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ellison RT, Giehl TJ. Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1080–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Larsen IS, Jensen BAH, Bonazzi E, Choi BSY, Kristensen NN, Schmidt EGW, et al. Fungal lysozyme leverages the gut microbiota to curb DSS-induced colitis. Gut Microbes. 2021;13: 1988836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Sitarik AR, Bobbitt KR, Havstad SL, Fujimura KE, Levin AM, Zoratti EM, et al. Breast milk transforming growth factor β Is associated with neonatal gut microbial composition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65:e60–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lu P, Yamaguchi Y, Fulton WB, Wang S, Zhou Q, Jia H, et al. Maternal aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation protects newborns against necrotizing enterocolitis. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Tian M, Li Q, Zheng T, Yang S, Chen F, Guan W, et al. Maternal microbe-specific modulation of the offspring microbiome and development during pregnancy and lactation. Gut Microbes. 2023;15: 2206505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Xu D, Zhou S, Liu Y, Scott AL, Yang J, Wan F. Complement in breast milk modifies offspring gut microbiota to promote infant health. Cell. 2024;187:750-763.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Yeruva L, Mulakala BK, Rajasundaram D, Gonzalez S, Cabrera-Rubio R, Martínez-Costa C, et al. Human milk miRNAs associate to maternal dietary nutrients, milk microbiota, infant gut microbiota and growth. Clin Nutr. 2023;42:2528–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Golan-Gerstl R, Elbaum Shiff Y, Moshayoff V, Schecter D, Leshkowitz D, Reif S. Characterization and biological function of milk-derived miRNAs. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(10). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 122.Yao T, Tuncil YE, Bhattarai S, Gurung M, Bode L, Yeruva L, et al. Effect of maternal miRNAs and milk oligosaccharides on regulating the growth behavior of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis. Journal of Functional Foods. 2025;128: 106800. [Google Scholar]
- 123.Samuel TM, Zhou Q, Giuffrida F, Munblit D, Verhasselt V, Thakkar SK. Nutritional and non-nutritional composition of human milk is modulated by maternal, infant, and methodological factors. Front Nutr. 2020;7: 576133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Collado MC, Laitinen K, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Maternal weight and excessive weight gain during pregnancy modify the immunomodulatory potential of breast milk. Pediatr Res. 2012;72:77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Gomez-Gallego C, Garcia-Mantrana I, Salminen S, Collado MC. The human milk microbiome and factors influencing its composition and activity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:400–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Collado MC, Isolauri E, Laitinen K, Salminen S. Effect of mother’s weight on infant’s microbiota acquisition, composition, and activity during early infancy: a prospective follow-up study initiated in early pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:1023–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Galley JD, Bailey M, Kamp Dush C, Schoppe-Sullivan S, Christian LM. Maternal obesity is associated with alterations in the gut microbiome in toddlers. Shankar K, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Crusell MKW, Hansen TH, Nielsen T, Allin KH, Rühlemann MC, Damm P, et al. Comparative studies of the gut microbiota in the offspring of mothers with and without gestational diabetes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10: 536282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Li K, Jin J, Liu Z, Chen C, Huang L, Sun Y. Dysbiosis of infant gut microbiota is related to the altered fatty acid composition of human milk from mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Gut Microbes. 2025;17: 2455789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Schulfer AF, Battaglia T, Alvarez Y, Bijnens L, Ruiz VE, Ho M, et al. Intergenerational transfer of antibiotic-perturbed microbiota enhances colitis in susceptible mice. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:234–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Miyoshi J, Bobe AM, Miyoshi S, Huang Y, Hubert N, Delmont TO, et al. Peripartum antibiotics promote gut dysbiosis, loss of immune tolerance, and inflammatory bowel disease in genetically prone offspring. Cell Rep. 2017;20:491–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gonzalez-Perez G, Hicks AL, Tekieli TM, Radens CM, Williams BL, Lamousé-Smith ESN. Maternal antibiotic treatment impacts development of the neonatal intestinal microbiome and antiviral immunity. J Immunol. 2016;196:3768–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Ward CP, Perelman D, Durand LR, Robinson JL, Cunanan KM, Sudakaran S, et al. Effects of fermented and fiber-rich foods on maternal & offspring microbiome study (FeFiFo-MOMS)—study design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025;150: 107834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Chassaing B, Koren O, Goodrich JK, Poole AC, Srinivasan S, Ley RE, et al. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015;519:92–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Chassaing B, Van de Wiele T, De Bodt J, Marzorati M, Gewirtz AT. Dietary emulsifiers directly alter human microbiota composition and gene expression ex vivo potentiating intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2017;66:1414–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Chassaing B, Compher C, Bonhomme B, Liu Q, Tian Y, Walters W, et al. Randomized controlled-feeding study of dietary emulsifier carboxymethylcellulose reveals detrimental impacts on the gut microbiota and metabolome. Gastroenterology. 2021;162:743–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Delaroque C, Chassaing B. Dietary emulsifier consumption accelerates type 1 diabetes development in NOD mice. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024;10:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Hornef MW, Torow N. ‘Layered immunity’ and the ‘neonatal window of opportunity’ – timed succession of non-redundant phases to establish mucosal host–microbial homeostasis after birth. Immunology. 2020;159:15–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Al Nabhani Z, Eberl G. Imprinting of the immune system by the microbiota early in life. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:183–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Olszak T, An D, Zeissig S, Vera MP, Richter J, Franke A, et al. Microbial exposure during early life has persistent effects on natural killer T cell function. Science. 2012;336:489–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Al Nabhani Z, Dulauroy S, Lécuyer E, Polomack B, Campagne P, Berard M, et al. Excess calorie intake early in life increases susceptibility to colitis in adulthood. Nat Metab. 2019;1:1101–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Goethel A, Turpin W, Rouquier S, Zanello G, Robertson SJ, Streutker CJ, et al. Nod2 influences microbial resilience and susceptibility to colitis following antibiotic exposure. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:720–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Russell SL, Gold MJ, Hartmann M, Willing BP, Thorson L, Wlodarska M, et al. Early life antibiotic-driven changes in microbiota enhance susceptibility to allergic asthma. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:440–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Cahenzli J, Köller Y, Wyss M, Geuking MB, McCoy KD. Intestinal microbial diversity during early-life colonization shapes long-term IgE levels. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:559–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Adami AJ, Bracken SJ, Guernsey LA, Rafti E, Maas KR, Graf J, et al. Early-life antibiotics attenuate regulatory T cell generation and increase the severity of murine house dust mite-induced asthma. Pediatr Res. 2018;84:426–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zhang XS, Li J, Krautkramer KA, Badri M, Battaglia T, Borbet TC, et al. Antibiotic-induced acceleration of type 1 diabetes alters maturation of innate intestinal immunity. Hooper LV, Garrett WS, editors. eLife. 2018;7:e37816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Zanvit P, Konkel JE, Jiao X, Kasagi S, Zhang D, Wu R, et al. Antibiotics in neonatal life increase murine susceptibility to experimental psoriasis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Cho I, Yamanishi S, Cox L, Methé BA, Zavadil J, Li K, et al. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity. Nature. 2012;488:621–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Schulfer AF, Schluter J, Zhang Y, Brown Q, Pathmasiri W, McRitchie S, et al. The impact of early-life sub-therapeutic antibiotic treatment (STAT) on excessive weight is robust despite transfer of intestinal microbes. ISME J. 2019;13:1280–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Jašarević E, Hill EM, Kane PJ, Rutt L, Gyles T, Folts L, et al. The composition of human vaginal microbiota transferred at birth affects offspring health in a mouse model. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Salia S, Burke FF, Hinks ME, Randell AM, Matheson MA, Walling SG, et al. Gut microbiota transfer from the preclinical maternal immune activation model of autism is sufficient to induce sex-specific alterations in immune response and behavioural outcomes. Brain Behav Immun. 2025;123:813–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Stephen-Victor E, Kuziel GA, Martinez-Blanco M, Jugder B-E, Benamar M, Wang Z, et al. RELMβ sets the threshold for microbiome-dependent oral tolerance. Nature. 2025;638:760–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Riedler J, Braun-Fahrländer C, Eder W, Schreuer M, Waser M, Maisch S, et al. Exposure to farming in early life and development of asthma and allergy: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358:1129–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Schuijs MJ, Willart MA, Vergote K, Gras D, Deswarte K, Ege MJ, et al. Farm dust and endotoxin protect against allergy through A20 induction in lung epithelial cells. Science. 2015;349:1106–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Benchimol EI, Kaplan GG, Otley AR, Nguyen GC, Underwood FE, Guttmann A, et al. Rural and urban residence during early life is associated with risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based inception and birth cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1412–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Risnes KR, Belanger K, Murk W, Bracken MB. Antibiotic exposure by 6 months and asthma and allergy at 6 years: findings in a cohort of 1,401 US children. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:310–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Mai X-M, Kull I, Wickman M, Bergström A. Antibiotic use in early life and development of allergic diseases: respiratory infection as the explanation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:1230–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Shaw SY, Blanchard JF, Bernstein CN. Association between the use of antibiotics in the first year of life and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2687–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Kronman MP, Zaoutis TE, Haynes K, Feng R, Coffin SE. Antibiotic exposure and IBD development among children: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e794-803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Örtqvist AK, Lundholm C, Halfvarson J, Ludvigsson JF, Almqvist C. Fetal and early life antibiotics exposure and very early onset inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Gut. 2019;68:218–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Azad MB, Bridgman SL, Becker AB, Kozyrskyj AL. Infant antibiotic exposure and the development of childhood overweight and central adiposity. Int J Obes. 2014;38:1290–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Boursi B, Mamtani R, Haynes K, Yang Y-X. The effect of past antibiotic exposure on diabetes risk. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:639–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Thavagnanam S, Fleming J, Bromley A, Shields MD, Cardwell CR. A meta-analysis of the association between Caesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38:629–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Neu J, Rushing J. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: long-term infant outcomes and the hygiene hypothesis. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38:321–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Decker E, Engelmann G, Findeisen A, Gerner P, Laass M, Ney D, et al. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac disease but not inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1433-1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Sikder MdAA, Rashid RB, Ahmed T, Sebina I, Howard DR, Ullah MdA, et al. Maternal diet modulates the infant microbiome and intestinal Flt3L necessary for dendritic cell development and immunity to respiratory infection. Immunity. 2023;56:1098-1114.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Katimbwa DA, Kim Y, Kim MJ, Jeong M, Lim J. Solubilized β-glucan supplementation in C57BL/6J mice dams augments neurodevelopment and cognition in the offspring driven by gut microbiome remodeling. Foods. 2024;13: 3102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Pretorius RA, Bodinier M, Prescott SL, Palmer DJ. Maternal fiber dietary intakes during pregnancy and infant allergic disease. Nutrients. 2019;11: 1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Myles IA, Fontecilla NM, Janelsins BM, Vithayathil PJ, Segre JA, Datta SK. Parental dietary fat intake alters offspring microbiome and immunity. J Immunol. 2013;191:3200–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Babu ST, Niu X, Raetz M, Savani RC, Hooper LV, Mirpuri J. Maternal high-fat diet results in microbiota-dependent expansion of ILC3s in mice offspring. JCI Insight. 2018;3: e99223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Costa SO, Chaves WF, Lopes PKF, Silva IM, Burguer B, Ignácio-Souza LM, et al. Maternal consumption of a high-fat diet modulates the inflammatory response in their offspring, mediated by the M1 muscarinic receptor. Front Immunol. 2023;14: 1273556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Huang C, Tan H, Song M, Liu K, Liu H, Wang J, et al. Maternal western diet mediates susceptibility of offspring to Crohn’s-like colitis by deoxycholate generation. Microbiome. 2023;11:96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell. 2016;165:1762–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Di Gesù CM, Matz LM, Bolding IJ, Fultz R, Hoffman KL, Gammazza AM, et al. Maternal gut microbiota mediate intergenerational effects of high-fat diet on descendant social behavior. Cell Rep. 2022;41: 111461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Nagel EM, Jacobs D, Johnson KE, Foster L, Duncan K, Kharbanda EO, et al. Maternal dietary intake of total fat, saturated fat, and added sugar is associated with infant adiposity and weight status at 6 mo of age. J Nutr. 2021;151:2353–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Gonzalez-Nahm S, Hoyo C, Østbye T, Neelon B, Allen C, Benjamin-Neelon SE. Associations of maternal diet with infant adiposity at birth, 6 months and 12 months. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e030186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Olivier-Van Stichelen S, Rother KI, Hanover JA. Maternal exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners impacts progeny’s metabolism and microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Milà-Guasch M, Ramírez S, Llana SR, Fos-Domènech J, Dropmann LM, Pozo M, et al. Maternal emulsifier consumption programs offspring metabolic and neuropsychological health in mice. Bouret SG, editor. PLoS Biol. 2023;21:e3002171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Rytter H, Naimi S, Wu G, Lewis J, Duquesnoy M, Vigué L, et al. In vitro microbiota model recapitulates and predicts individualised sensitivity to dietary emulsifier. Gut. 2025;74(5):761-774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 180.Daniel N, Wu GD, Walters W, Compher C, Ni J, Delaroque C, et al. Human intestinal microbiome determines individualized inflammatory response to dietary emulsifier carboxymethylcellulose consumption. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;17:315–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Bonazzi E, Bretin A, Vigué L, Hao F, Patterson AD, Gewirtz AT, et al. Individualized microbiotas dictate the impact of dietary fiber on colitis sensitivity. Microbiome. 2024;12:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Argaw-Denboba A, Schmidt TSB, Di Giacomo M, Ranjan B, Devendran S, Mastrorilli E, et al. Paternal microbiome perturbations impact offspring fitness. Nature. 2024;629:652–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Chleilat F, Schick A, Deleemans JM, Ma K, Alukic E, Wong J, et al. Paternal high protein diet modulates body composition, insulin sensitivity, epigenetics, and gut microbiota intergenerationally in rats. FASEB J. 2021;35: e21847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Korgan AC, Foxx CL, Hashmi H, Sago SA, Stamper CE, Heinze JD, et al. Effects of paternal high-fat diet and maternal rearing environment on the gut microbiota and behavior. Sci Rep. 2022;12:10179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Gerretsen VIV, Schuijs MJ. The role of LPS and CpG in the farm effect against allergies, and beyond. Allergol Select. 2022;6:104–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Qing L, Qian X, Zhu H, Wang J, Sun J, Jin Z, et al. Maternal-infant probiotic transmission mitigates early-life stress-induced autism in mice. Gut Microbes. 2025;17: 2456584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Correia Gomes D, Meza Alvarado JE, Zamora Briseño JA, Cano Sarmiento C, Camacho Morales A, Viveros CR. Maternal supplementation with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG improves glucose tolerance and modulates the intestinal microbiota of offspring. Diseases. 2024;12:312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Rautava S, Collado MC, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Probiotics modulate host-microbe interaction in the placenta and fetal gut: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neonatology. 2012;102:178–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Jones JM, Reinke SN, Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M, Garssen J, Jenmalm MC, Srinivasjois R, et al. Maternal prebiotic supplementation during pregnancy and lactation modifies the microbiome and short chain fatty acid profile of both mother and infant. Clin Nutr. 2024;43:969–80. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 190.Alemu BK, Azeze GG, Wu L, Lau SL, Wang CC, Wang Y. Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(11):101148. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 191.Holst AQ, Myers P, Rodríguez-García P, Hermes GDA, Melsaether C, Baker A, et al. Infant formula supplemented with five human milk oligosaccharides shifts the fecal microbiome of formula-fed infants closer to that of breastfed infants. Nutrients. 2023;15: 3087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Eor JY, Lee CS, Moon SH, Cheon JY, Pathiraja D, Park B, et al. Effect of probiotic-fortified infant formula on infant gut health and microbiota modulation. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2023;43:659–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Alliet P, Vandenplas Y, Roggero P, Jespers SNJ, Peeters S, Stalens J-P, et al. Safety and efficacy of a probiotic-containing infant formula supplemented with 2’-fucosyllactose: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2022;21:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, Braegger C, Chmielewska A, Decsi T, Kolacek S, Mihatsch W, et al. Supplementation of infant formula with probiotics and/or prebiotics: a systematic review and comment by the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;52:238–50. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 195.Nakaji S, Sugawara K, Saito D, Yoshioka Y, MacAuley D, Bradley T, et al. Trends in dietary fiber intake in Japan over the last century. Eur J Nutr. 2002;41:222–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Lee JH, Duster M, Roberts T, Devinsky O. United States dietary trends since 1800: lack of association between saturated fatty acid consumption and non-communicable diseases. Front Nutr. 2022;8: 748847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Viennois E, Pujada A, Sung J, Yang C, Gewirtz AT, Chassaing B, et al. Impact of PepT1 deletion on microbiota composition and colitis requires multiple generations. npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2020;6:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Gilley SP, Ruebel ML, Chintapalli SV, Wright CJ, Rozance PJ, Shankar K. Calorie restriction during gestation impacts maternal and offspring fecal microbiome in mice. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1423464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Rakhshandehroo M, Harvey L, De Bruin A, Timmer E, Lohr J, Tims S, et al. Maternal exposure to purified versus grain-based diet during early lactation in mice affects offspring growth and reduces responsivity to Western-style diet challenge in adulthood. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2025;16:e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Chu DM, Antony KM, Ma J, Prince AL, Showalter L, Moller M, et al. The early infant gut microbiome varies in association with a maternal high-fat diet. Genome Med. 2016;8:77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Hansen CHF, Krych Ł, Buschard K, Metzdorff SB, Nellemann C, Hansen LH, et al. A maternal gluten-free diet reduces inflammation and diabetes incidence in the offspring of NOD mice. Diabetes. 2014;63:2821–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.



