Abstract
Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-based vectors are characterized by low titers. In an effort to transfer MMTV-specific regulation of gene expression to a more efficient murine leukemia virus (MLV) vector, we have replaced the complete 3′ U3 region of MLV with the complete U3 region of MMTV. Virus titers were not significantly affected by this modification, there was no impairment of reverse transcription and integration, and after infection of cells, the MMTV promoter is duplicated and translocated to the 5′ long terminal repeat, resulting in glucocorticoid-regulatable RNA expression.
A consequence of the reverse transcription of the retroviral genomic RNA into a double-stranded DNA molecule in the infected cell is the duplication of the U3 region, located at the 3′ end of the viral RNA, and the juxtapositioning of this second copy to the 5′ end (for a review, see reference 10). The U3 region carries the retroviral promoter and enhancer elements which control gene expression from the provirus. This property was originally exploited by Yu and coworkers (26) to construct retroviral vectors in which 299 bp of the murine leukemia virus (MLV) U3 region, carrying the two 72-bp repeat enhancer elements, were deleted, creating self-inactivating vectors. Such self-inactivating vectors carry, after infection and reverse transcription, a single functioning internal heterologous promoter which controls the expression of the linked therapeutic gene.
Double-copy vectors in which a promoter and a gene are inserted into the 3′ long terminal repeat (LTR) of the vector have also been constructed. Upon infection of cells with the vector, the expression cassette is present twice in each LTR (7). The promoters of a number of viral or cellular genes have been inserted into the MLV U3 region, either in addition to or in place of the virus enhancer, so that the expression of genes carried by such vectors is placed under heterologous-promoter transcriptional control in the infected cell (2, 3, 18, 25). The earliest attempt to insert a heterologous enhancer into the U3 region of an MLV provirus involved the use of a 335-bp Sau3A fragment of the U3 region of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) LTR, though this was in the context of a complete biologically active provirus rather than a retroviral vector (16).
The expression of MMTV is controlled by a number of factors, including glucocorticoid hormones, and the promoter of this retrovirus has been extensively exploited in transgenes, including those of therapeutic relevance (24), for conditional expression (5). Retroviral vectors based on MMTV would be useful for inducible expression of transferred genes and preferential expression in organs such as the mammary gland. However, even though such MMTV-based vector systems have been constructed (6, 15, 22, 23), they result in low titers, probably as a result of the complex regulation of MMTV (1, 5).
Insertion of part of the MMTV U3 region (containing the MMTV glucocorticoid response element) into the 3′ LTR U3 region of MLV at the expense of the MLV enhancer was previously shown to be incompatible with recombinant virus production (16). Only when part of the MMTV U3 region was additionally inserted into the 3′ MLV U3 region could recombinant virus be obtained, although this virus showed a serious reduction in infectivity and was not stable, undergoing frequent rearrangements. To circumvent these problems, Overhauser and Fan (16) had to insert MMTV U3 fragments into both the 3′ and 5′ MLV LTRs. Again, only constructs with additional MMTV sequences in both LTRs gave functional virus, and no virus could be recovered when the MLV enhancer sequences were replaced by MMTV sequences. This instability may have been due to the ability of this virus to undergo more than one round of infection. For this study, we reasoned that a stable retroviral vector might be obtained if all of the MLV vector U3 sequences except for the inverted repeat (IR) located at the 5′ end of the U3 region, which is required for vector provirus integration (4), were replaced with those of MMTV.
To test this hypothesis, we constructed a hybrid MMTV/MLV vector based on the MLV-derived pBAG retroviral vector (17). This vector carries a β-galactosidase (β-gal) gene that is expressed from the MLV promoter as well as a neomycin gene that is expressed from the simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter (Fig. 1A). The pBAG vector was chosen since even though the titers are lower than with contemporary vectors, the presence of a prokaryotic origin of replication in the vector allows facile recloning of integrated proviruses for later molecular characterization.
FIG. 1.
Construction of the hybrid vector pMMTV-BAG. (A) Shown is a schematic representation of the pBAG (17) vector carrying the β-gal marker gene (cross-hatched box), the SV40 promoter driving expression from the neomycin resistance gene (checkered box), as well as the origin of replication (ori) from pBR322 (hatched box). The complete U3 region except the IR of the 3′ LTR within the BAG vector was deleted by a PCR-mediated approach (for the complete cloning strategy, please contact the corresponding author). (B) Deletion of the U3 region was confirmed by sequencing from the ClaI site into the U5 region. The U3 region of MMTV was amplified by PCR with the plasmid pBG102 (a plasmid containing the 3′ LTR from Mtv 2 [21]) as the template and primers carrying the MluI and SacII extension. (C and D) The product was digested with SacII and MluI and ligated to the SacII- and MluI-digested vector to give the plasmid pMMTV-BAG (8,377 bp), in which the β-gal gene is under the transcriptional control of the MLV promoter after transfection (C) and is under the control of the MMTV promoter after infection (D) (for further details, see reference 20). The positions of primers specific for the MMTV U3 region (P1, 5′-GACCACAGCCAACTTCCTCTTACA-3′; P3, 5′-ATACCGCGGAAAAAGGGGGAAATGCC-3′) or MLV R sequences (P4, 5′-GCGCCAGTCCTCCGATTGA-3′) together with a primer specific for the MLV packaging region (P2, 5′-GGTCCGCCAGATACAGAGCTAGTTA-3′) or the β-gal gene (P5, 5′-TTCATCCACCACATACAGGC-3′) are shown (D), as are the expected sizes of the PCR products that can be obtained by using these primers and the MMTV (labelled fragment A) and MLV (labelled fragment B) probes that can be used to detect them.
The U3 region of this vector was deleted by a PCR-mediated approach (20). This strategy ensured that the inverted repeat at the 5′ border of the U3 region was left intact and also that unique SacII and MluI sites were inserted to facilitate the introduction of the MMTV U3 region. The complete 1.2-kb U3 region of MMTV was isolated by PCR using specific primers carrying SacII and MluI restriction enzyme cleavage sites and inserted into the 3′ U3-deleted MLV-based vector plasmid (Fig. 1B). The β-gal gene was introduced into the vector plasmid in such a way as to ensure that its expression would be driven by the 5′ MLV U3 promoter in the context of the plasmid after transfection (Fig. 1C), whereas it would be placed under the transcriptional control of the MMTV U3 promoter in infected cells after successful promoter conversion following reverse transcription (Fig. 1D).
The hybrid vector plasmid pMMTV-BAG and the original pBAG vector plasmid, both of which carry an internal neomycin resistance gene constitutively expressed from an internal SV40 promoter, were introduced into the amphotropic packaging cell line PA317 (12), and the resultant retroviral vector particles were used to infect a number of cell lines. The titer of transducing particles obtained from a population of MMTV-BAG vector virus-producing cells (Fig. 2, solid bars) was slightly reduced in comparison to that obtained from a population of the parental BAG vector-producing cells (Fig. 2, cross-hatched bars) when assayed on Rat-2 or EJ cells but was similar as judged by infection of CrFK cells and even slightly increased on NIH 3T3 cells. These cell lines were chosen for infection studies since it is known that the MMTV promoter is active in these cells, a factor of importance for later expression studies. The titers obtained contrast favorably with the previously reported 500-fold reduction in titer using MLV virus with 3′ and 5′ MMTV insertions in the presence of dexamethasone (16). One explanation for this may be the higher transcriptional efficiency of the 5′ MLV LTR in transfected packaging cells compared to the relatively poor transcriptional efficiency of the MMTV promoter even in the presence of dexamethasone.
FIG. 2.
Titer is not appreciably altered by replacement of U3 sequences. Rat-2, NIH 3T3, EJ, and CrFK cells were infected with MMTV-BAG (solid bars) and BAG (cross-hatched bars) produced from stably transfected populations of PA317 cells, as previously described (8). Each bar represents the average of data from three independent experiments, and error bars (indicating the standard error of the mean) are shown.
To confirm that the transduced cells had acquired the vector constructs and to verify that the MMTV promoter was now present in the 5′ LTR of the vector provirus in these cells, DNA was prepared from noninfected and infected cell populations of Rat-2, EJ, and NIH 3T3 cells and analyzed by PCR. Primers specific for either the MMTV U3 (P1 and P3) or MLV R (P4) sequences in combination with a second primer complementary to the packaging region (P2) or the β-gal gene (P5) present in all three constructs were used for these analyses (Fig. 1D). The PCR products were hybridized to MMTV U3- or MLV-specific probes (Fig. 1D, labeled fragments A and B, respectively). DNA prepared from cells infected with the MMTV-BAG virus gave PCR products of 1.2 and 1.6 kb after amplification with the P1-P2 and P3-P2 primer pairs, respectively. These products hybridized, as expected, to both MMTV U3-specific (Fig. 3A, lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11) and MLV-specific (Fig. 3B, lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11) hybridization probes. In contrast, the primer pair P4-P5 gave a PCR product of 1.8 kb that hybridized to the MLV probe (Fig. 3B, lanes 13, 15, and 17) but not to the MMTV U3 probe (Fig. 3A, lanes 13, 15, and 17). Taken together, these data are consistent with the occurrence of promoter conversion (see also below).
FIG. 3.
PCR analysis of infected-cell DNA for the presence of MMTV-BAG sequences. Genomic DNA (1 μg) was amplified by PCR using 40 pmol of each primer specific for the MMTV U3 region or MLV R sequences and of a primer specific for the MLV packaging region or the β-gal gene. PCRs were performed under the following reaction conditions: 1 min at 94°C, 2 min at 50°C, and 3 min at 68°C for 35 cycles. The PCR product was separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to Zetaprobe membranes (Bio-Rad), and hybridized to 32P-labeled probes. Promoter conversion was detected by using two primers specific for the MMTV U3 region (P1 and P3) in combination with a primer specific for the MLV packaging region (P2). An MLV R region-specific primer (P4) was also used in combination with a primer specific for the β-gal gene (P5). Filters were hybridized against a 0.9-kb MMTV U3-specific PstI fragment (A) or an MLV-specific PCR fragment (B), as shown in Fig. 1D. Lanes 1, 7, and 13, infected Rat-2 cells; lanes 2, 8, and 14, noninfected Rat-2 cells; lanes 3, 9, and 15, infected NIH 3T3 cells; lanes 4, 10, and 16, noninfected NIH 3T3 cells; lanes 5, 11, and 17, infected EJ cells; lanes 6, 12, and 18, noninfected EJ cells.
To investigate whether any recombination has occurred to generate wild-type MLV, PCR analyses were performed with an MLV U3-specific primer in combination with the packaging region P2 primer. No signal could be detected with these primers when 1 μg of DNA from a population of Rat-2 cells infected with the hybrid vector was analyzed. A dilution series revealed that ≥0.03 copies of recombined MLV could be detected in 1 μg (∼2 × 105 MMTV-BAG copies) of genomic DNA with our PCR primers and conditions, followed by hybridization with a 387-bp MLV LTR probe (data not shown). This suggests that the U3 region was not restored (for example, by recombination) in any of the individually infected cells making up the population (data not shown).
Although MMTV promoter activity is restricted to a few cell types in vivo (19), this promoter is active in many cell types in vitro, and the ability of glucocorticoid hormones to stimulate expression from this promoter has been extensively utilized in many cell types, including fibroblasts (9). To examine the effect of glucocorticoid hormone on β-gal expression in MMTV-BAG-infected cells, enzyme activity was determined, either by using a light-emitting substrate in a photometric assay or by histochemical staining. All of the tested infected cell populations showed expression of β-gal in the absence of glucocorticoid. However, addition of the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone resulted in enhanced expression (Table 1), as expected, from the MMTV promoter (5). Levels of induction were between 3- and 40-fold, depending on the cell type; the best induction was observed in CrFK cells (Table 1), one of the few cell lines known to be permissive for MMTV replication (reference 21 and references cited therein). In contrast, levels of induction from the MLV promoter were maximally 1.6-fold. This low level of glucocorticoid induction of murine C-type promoters has been reported previously (11). Histochemical staining of Rat-2 cells infected with MMTV-BAG grown in the presence or absence of dexamethasone revealed that more cells express the β-gal enzyme when grown in the presence of dexamethasone than when grown in the absence of this hormone (data not shown). The hormone response element of MMTV has been delineated to the region between positions −50 and −202 (for a review, see reference 5); thus, the lower (two- to threefold) levels of dexamethasone induction of virus-specific RNA and reverse transcriptase activity in the supernatant previously reported by Overhauser and Fan (16) may be explained by the fact that only part of this element (positions −117 to −202) was included in the previously transferred 335-bp U3 fragment.
TABLE 1.
Dexamethasone-inducible expression of β-gal in transduced cellsa
| Infecting virus and glucocorticoid statusb | β-Gal activity (lu/mg) in infected cell linesc:
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIH 3T3 | Rat-2 | EJ | CrFK | |
| BAG | ||||
| − Dex | 1.14 × 106 | NDd | 1.27 × 106 | 3.30 × 105 |
| + Dex | 1.73 × 106 | ND | 1.99 × 106 | 2.70 × 105 |
| Fold induction | 1.5 | ND | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| MMTV-BAG | ||||
| − Dex | 1.25 × 107 | 5.56 × 107 | 1.26 × 106 | 4.10 × 106 |
| + Dex | 4.16 × 107 | 6.93 × 107 | 7.94 × 106 | 1.67 × 108 |
| Fold induction | 3.3 | 1.2 | 6.3 | 40.7 |
Total cell protein was extracted from populations of infected cells that had previously been selected in G418-containing medium, and 5 μg was analyzed for β-gal enzymatic activity by using the Galacto-Light kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Tropix, Bedford, Mass.).
− Dex, without dexamethasone; + Dex, with dexamethasone.
lu, light units.
ND, not detectable.
The MMTV promoter should be especially well suited for the expression of genes in the mammary gland in vivo. To investigate this, we analyzed cells explanted from the mammary gland of a pregnant mouse and established in monolayer culture as well as the pregnant-mouse mammary gland in vivo for expression of the β-gal reporter gene after infection with the two vectors (Fig. 4). Although the MLV promoter in the BAG virus gave better levels of expression than the MMTV-BAG in infected primary mammary cells in cell culture, the in vivo expression levels from the MMTV promoter were consistently higher than those from the MLV promoter (BAG virus).
FIG. 4.
Expression of β-gal in infected mammary cells. Primary mammary epithelial cells were prepared from 10-day-pregnant BALB/c mice and infected with either the MMTV-BAG (MMTV.) or BAG virus. For in vivo experiments, the MMTV-BAG or BAG virus was injected directly into the mammary gland of a 10-day-pregnant BALB/c mouse; 5 days later, protein extracts were prepared and analyzed for β-gal activity, using the Galacto-Light kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Tropix, Bedford, Mass.). Each bar represents the average of data from multiple independent experiments, and error bars (indicating the standard error of the mean) are shown. RLU, relative light units.
The MMTV-BAG retroviral vector carries a procaryotic origin of replication (Fig. 1), allowing the recloning of the integrated provirus from genomic DNA. Genomic DNA was isolated from the population of MMTV-BAG-infected Rat-2 cells; digested with the restriction enzyme Asp700, which does not cleave within the vector provirus; ligated; and used for electroporation of Escherichia coli. After selection on kanamycin-containing medium, a number of plasmids carrying integrated proviruses were obtained. Restriction enzyme mapping combined with Southern blotting confirmed that the MMTV U3 region had replaced that of MLV (data not shown). Sequencing of the junction between the rat flanking sequence and at the 5′ end of the provirus revealed that the SacII restriction site and the MMTV U3 sequences inserted into this site were intact, as expected. The MLV IR was also present, but it had been shortened by 2 bp, as expected due to processing during the integration event (4). Similarly, the sequence at the border between the MMTV U3 and MLV R regions in the 5′ LTR revealed that the MMTV U3, MluI restriction site, and MLV R sequence were also intact (Fig. 5A).
FIG. 5.
Analysis of structure and expression of the hybrid provirus from transduced cells. (A) Sequencing of the junction regions of a recloned provirus. Sequencing was carried out with an automatic sequencer (ABI 373a; Applied Biosystems). The reactions were performed with a dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR mixtures contained 1 μg of plasmid DNA and 10 pmol of a primer pair, one of which was complementary to the U3 region of MMTV (S1, 5′-CCTTGGCTGCTTCTC-3′) and the other of which was complementary to the U5 region of MLV (S2, 5′-CCACAAGTCGGATGCAACTG-3′). Shown are the sequences at the U3-R junction of the 5′ LTR and the integration site-U3 junction of the 5′ LTR. The sequence analysis reveals that (i) the borders between the MMTV U3 and MLV R regions are intact after promoter conversion and (ii) the IR has been used for integration. Closed circles indicate the SacII restriction enzyme cleavage site, and closed squares indicate the MluI site used to introduce the MMTV U3 region. +1 indicates the position of the classic CAP site; SD indicates the splice donor site. (B) S1 nuclease protection analysis. Total RNA was isolated from a population of MMTV-BAG-infected cells grown in the presence or absence of 10−6 M dexamethasone. Total RNA (40 μg) from MMTV-BAG-infected Rat-2 cells grown in the presence (lane 1) or absence (lane 2) of dexamethasone, as well as that from noninfected Rat-2 cells (lane 3), was hybridized against a 32P-end-labeled BsaI LTR DNA fragment as previously described (6). After S1 digestion, a protected fragment of 90 bp was obtained, as determined with PhosphoImager software (Molecular Dynamics). The RNA of dexamethasone-treated cells (lane 1) gives a stronger signal than that of nonstimulated cells (lane 2). No signal was obtained from the RNA derived from noninfected Rat-2 cells (lane 3). As a marker, HaeIII-digested pBR322 was used, and the 89-nucleotide (nt) fragment is clearly visible (lanes M).
Finally, we investigated whether the initiation site of RNA transcribed from the MMTV promoter carried in the U3 region is maintained after insertion of the MluI restriction enzyme site, since it is known that the spacing between the TATA box in the promoter and the transcription initiation site is critical. The RNA initiation site was determined by S1 analysis. Total RNA from infected cells grown in the presence and absence of dexamethasone or from noninfected cells was prepared and hybridized to a 32P-end-labeled BsaI DNA fragment of the recloned vector pMMTV-BAG. If the classic MLV initiation site is used, a 89-bp fragment should be protected from S1 digestion (Fig. 5B). The probe protected a fragment of 90 nucleotides (Fig. 5B, lanes 1 and 2), placing the site of transcription initiation 1 bp upstream of the classic CAP site (Fig. 5A). This may be a result of the introduction of the MluI restriction site, which increases the spacing between the TATA box within the MMTV promoter and the classical R-U5 border by 6 bp. A clear induction of the signal could be observed in RNA derived from cells grown in the presence of the synthetic glucocorticoid hormone dexamethasone (lane 1) compared to that from cells grown in the absence of dexamethasone (lane 2). This confirms the data obtained by enzymatic assay for β-gal (Table 1).
In summary, the hybrid MMTV/MLV vector behaves as expected at the molecular level throughout the whole transduction cycle, and in the infected cell, expression of the integrated provirus is controlled by the newly inserted MMTV U3 promoter rather than the original MLV promoter. The MMTV promoter is preferentially active in mammary epithelial cells and a few additional cell types. This has been attributed to a mammary-specific regulatory region located in the MMTV U3 region between positions −1166 and −739 (5, 13, 14). This region was not included previously in the MLV constructs with MMTV U3 sequences inserted in the 3′ and 5′ LTRs (16). We have established transgenic mice carrying the recloned MMTV-BAG provirus and are currently determining the expression spectrum of the hybrid MMTV/MLV virus. Preliminary data suggest that expression from these vectors is limited to that of MMTV, suggesting that the hybrid MMTV/MLV vector may be a useful high-titer alternative to the previously described MMTV vector systems for further analysis of the viral life cycle.
Acknowledgments
We thank David Winder for help and Volker Erfle for support.
This project was financed in part by a grant from the Bavarian Forschungsstiftung FORGEN program and EU Biotechnology grant BIO4-CT95-0100.
ADDENDUM IN PROOF
The MMTV/MLV vector has recently been used to conditionally express the WAF-1/CIP-1/SDI-1 cell cycle regulatory gene (S. Mrochen, D. Klein, S. Nikol, J. R. Smith, B. Salmons, and W. H. Günzburg, J. Mol. Med. 75:820–828, 1997).
REFERENCES
- 1.Acha-Orbea H, MacDonald H R. Superantigens of mouse mammary tumor virus. Annu Rev Immunol. 1995;13:459–486. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.002331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cannon P M, Kim N, Kingsman S M, Kingsman A J. Murine leukemia virus-based Tat-inducible long terminal repeat replacement vectors: a new system for anti-human immunodeficiency virus gene therapy. J Virol. 1996;70:8234–8240. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.11.8234-8240.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferrari G, Salvatori G, Rossi C, Cossu G, Mavilio F. A retroviral vector containing a muscle-specific enhancer drives gene expression only in differentiated muscle fibers. Hum Gene Ther. 1995;6:733–742. doi: 10.1089/hum.1995.6.6-733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goff S P. Genetics of retroviral integration. Annu Rev Genet. 1992;26:527–544. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.002523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Günzburg W H, Salmons B. Factors controlling the expression of mouse mammary tumour virus. Biochem J. 1992;283:625–632. doi: 10.1042/bj2830625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Günzburg W H, Salmons B. Mouse mammary tumour virus mediated transfer and expression of neomycin resistance to infected cultured cells. Virology. 1986;155:236–248. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(86)90183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hantzopoulos P A, Sullenger B A, Ungers G, Gilboa E. Improved gene expression upon transfer of the adenosine deaminase minigene outside the transcriptional unit of a retroviral vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:3519–3523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hornsby P J, Salmons B. Oncogene-expressing cell lines. In: Doyle A, Griffiths J B, Newell D G, editors. Cell and tissue culture: laboratory procedures, module 26D. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 1994. pp. 2.1–2.5. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jaggi R, Salmons B, Muellener D, Groner B. The v-mos and H-ras oncogene expression represses glucocorticoid hormone dependent transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR. EMBO J. 1986;5:2609–2616. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04541.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Luciw P A, Leung N J. Mechanisms of retrovirus replication. In: Levy J A, editor. The retroviridae. Vol. 1. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1992. pp. 159–298. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miksicek R, Heber A, Schmid W, Danesch U, Posseckert G, Beato M, Schutz G. Glucocorticoid responsiveness of the transcriptional enhancer of Moloney murine sarcoma virus. Cell. 1986;46:283–290. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90745-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miller A D, Buttimore C. Redesign of retrovirus packaging cell lines to avoid recombination leading to helper virus production. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:2895–2902. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.8.2895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mink S, Härtig E, Jennewein P, Doppler W, Cato A C B. A mammary cell-specific enhancer in mouse mammary tumor virus DNA is composed of multiple regulatory elements including binding sites for CTF/NFI and a novel transcription factor, mammary cell-activating factor. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:4906–4918. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.4906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mok E, Golovkina T V, Ross S R. A mouse mammary tumor virus mammary gland enhancer confers tissue-specific but not lactation-dependent expression in transgenic mice. J Virol. 1992;66:7529–7532. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.12.7529-7532.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Morris D W, Bradshaw H D, Jr, Billy H T, Munn R J, Cardiff R D. Isolation of a pathogenic clone of mouse mammary tumor virus. J Virol. 1989;63:148–158. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.1.148-158.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Overhauser J, Fan H. Generation of glucocorticoid-responsive Moloney murine leukemia virus by insertion of regulatory sequences from murine mammary tumor virus into the long terminal repeat. J Virol. 1985;54:133–144. doi: 10.1128/jvi.54.1.133-144.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Price J, Turner D, Cepko C. Lineage analysis in the vertebrate nervous system by retrovirus-mediated gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:156–160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Robinson D, Elliott J F, Chang L J. Retroviral vector with a CMV-IE/HIV-TAR hybrid LTR gives high basal expression levels and is up-regulated by HIV-1 Tat. Gene Ther. 1995;2:269–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ross S R, Hsu C-L L, Choi Y, Mok E, Dudley J P. Negative regulation in correct tissue-specific expression of mouse mammary tumor virus in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:5822–5829. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Saller R M. Design von locus- und gewebespezifischen retroviralen Vektoren für eine in vivo Gentherapie. Doctoral thesis. Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilian University; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Salmons B, Groner B, Calberg-Bacq C M, Ponta H. Production of mouse mammary tumor virus upon transfection of a recombinant proviral DNA into cultured cells. Virology. 1985;144:101–114. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Salmons B, Moritz-Legrand S, Garcha I, Günzburg W H. Construction and characterization of a packaging cell line for MMTV-based retroviral vectors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;159:1191–1198. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)92236-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shackleford G M, Varmus H E. Construction of a clonable, infectious, and tumorigenic mouse mammary tumor virus provirus and a derivative genetic vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:9655–9659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sparmann G, Walther W, Günzburg W H, Uckert W, Salmons B. Conditional expression of human TNF-α: a system for inducible cytotoxicity. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:103–107. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910590119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vile R G, Diaz R M, Miller N, Mitchell S, Tuszyanski A, Russell S J. Tissue-specific gene expression from Mo-MLV retroviral vectors with hybrid LTRs containing the murine tyrosinase enhancer promoter. Virology. 1995;214:307–313. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.9923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yu S F, von Ruden T, Kantoff P W, Garber C, Seiberg M, Ruther U, Anderson W F, Wagner E F, Gilboa E. Self-inactivating retroviral vectors designed for transfer of whole genes into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:3194–3198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.10.3194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





