Summary
Background
Treatments available to prevent progression of virus-induced lung diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are of limited benefit once respiratory failure occurs. The efficacy of approved and emerging cytokine signalling-modulating antibodies is variable and is affected by disease course and patient-specific inflammation patterns. Therefore, understanding the role of inflammation on the viral infectious cycle is critical for effective use of cytokine-modulating agents.
Methods
The role of the type 2 cytokine IL-13 on SARS-CoV-2 binding/entry, replication, and host response was investigated in primary HAE cells in vitro and in a model of mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo using single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing approaches. Additionally, the responses were quantified using immunofluorescence, histopathology, immunohistochemistry and LC-MS/MS assays.
Findings
IL-13 protected airway epithelial cells from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro by decreasing the abundance of ACE2-expressing ciliated cells rather than by neutralisation in the airway surface liquid or by interferon-mediated antiviral effects. In contrast, IL-13 worsened disease severity in mice; the effects were mediated by eicosanoid signalling and were abolished in mice deficient in the phospholipase A2 enzyme PLA2G2D.
Interpretation
IL-13-induced inflammation differentially affects multiple steps of COVID-19 pathogenesis. IL-13-induced inflammation may be protective against initial SARS-CoV-2 airway epithelial infection; however, it enhances disease progression in vivo. Blockade of IL-13 and/or eicosanoid signalling may be protective against progression to severe respiratory virus-induced lung diseases.
Funding
Carver Trust COVID-19 Grant; CF Foundation Iowa RDP; NIH 1R01HL163024; K01HL140261; NIH R01AI129269; NIH P01AI060699; NIH Grant P30 DK-54759; Cystic Fibrosis Foundation PEZZUL20A1-KB; Stead Family Foundation.
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, IL-13, scRNA-seq, Prostaglandin, Eicosanoids
Research in context.
Evidence before this study
Prior to this study, various pieces of evidence indicated the significant role of cytokines in the pathogenesis and progression of COVID-19. Severe COVID-19 cases were marked by cytokine storm syndrome, leading to immune activation and hyperinflammation. Treatments aimed at modulating cytokine signalling, such as IL-6 receptor antagonists, had shown moderate effects in managing severe COVID-19 cases. Studies also revealed an excessive production of type 2 cytokines, particularly IL-13 and IL-4, in the plasma and lungs of patients with COVID-19, which was associated with adverse outcomes. Treatment with anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibodies improved survival following SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting that IL-13 plays a role in disease severity. Type 2 cytokines were observed to potentially suppress type 1 responses, essential for viral clearance, and imbalances between these cytokine types were linked to negative COVID-19 outcomes. These findings highlighted the complex interactions between cytokines and the immune response during viral infections, underscoring the importance of understanding IL-13's role in COVID-19 and related lung diseases for developing effective therapeutic interventions.
Added value of this study
In this study, we explored the impact of IL-13-induced inflammation on various stages of the SARS-CoV-2 infection cycle using both murine (in vivo) and primary human airway epithelial (in vitro) culture models. Our findings indicated that IL-13 provided protection to airway epithelial cells against SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, partly by reducing the number of ACE2-expressing ciliated cells. Conversely, IL-13 exacerbated the severity of SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease in mice, primarily through PLA2G2D-mediated eicosanoid biosynthesis.
Implications of all the available evidence
Current evidence indicates that PLA2G2D plays a crucial role in the IL-13-driven exacerbation of COVID-19 in mice, suggesting that targeting the IL-13-PLA2G2D axis could help protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. These insights are important for clinical research, especially for studies focussing on drugs that modify IL-13 signalling or modulate eicosanoids in the treatment of asthma and respiratory virus-induced lung diseases.
Introduction
The implementation of safe and effective vaccination made COVID-19 largely preventable and changed the course of the pandemic. Moreover, selected treatments with modest efficacy have been approved for people recently diagnosed with COVID-19. The combination of antiviral drugs nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, known as Paxlovid, can decrease the risk of progression when given early after diagnosis.1 Severe COVID-19 is characterised by cytokine storm syndrome and immune activation; therefore, promising treatments aimed at modulating cytokine signalling have been developed. For example, suppression of interleukin 6 (IL-6) signalling with receptor antagonists have moderate effects in severe cases.2 However, we continue to lack effective therapies to stop disease progression once respiratory failure ensues in COVID-19 and other respiratory virus-induced diseases.
Other cytokine targeting strategies have also shown promise. Several observations suggest that the type 2 cytokine, interleukin 13 (IL-13) which is associated with asthma, chronic bronchitis, and allergies, in addition to mediating responses to helminth infections3 may be related to the severity of COVID-19: 1) In the plasma and lungs of patients with COVID-19, IL-13 and IL-4 were produced in excess4; 2) treatment with an anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibody improved survival following SARS-CoV-2 infection5 and is linked to a lower risk of mortality and improved lung function in humans6,7; and 3) Type 2 cytokines, like IL-4 and IL-13, may suppress type 1 responses necessary for viral clearance8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and type 2/type 1 imbalances are linked to negative COVID-19 outcomes.14 In the context of viral infection, IL-13 can be produced by multiple pulmonary cell types including T helper type 2, innate lymphoid cells type 2, mast cells, and eosinophils.3,15, 16, 17, 18 Prior studies including our previous data show that endogenous or exogenously administered IL-13 can drive airway remodelling, goblet cell metaplasia, and many other features common in asthma.16,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Understanding the role of inflammation on the outcomes of viral infection is important for therapeutic drug development and for selecting the right time and patients for the treatment. For example, the use of corticosteroids such as dexamethasone, compared with usual care or placebo, reduced mortality rate among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation; however, this effect did not extend to patients who did not require respiratory support.25,26 Similarly, treating hospitalised patients with COVID-19 with remdesivir, an antiviral drug,27 or baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory properties, shortened recovery time and improved clinical status, notably for those on high-flow oxygen or ventilation.28 A recent study reported that after receiving the first two doses of adult SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, patients on type 2 cytokine-targeting biologics, such as benralizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab, exhibited decreased SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, decreased neutralising capacity, and lower immunity as compared to individuals not on biologics. This effect was significantly lower in a subgroup of asthmatics taking biologics compared to asthmatics not on biologics.29
Overall, previous studies suggest that type 2 inflammation in people with chronic lung disease has complex effects on COVID-19 progression. A better understanding of the role of IL-13 at each step of viral pathogenesis may facilitate development of effective treatments to prevent disease progression. In this study, we hypothesised that IL-13 affects susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and systematically investigated the role of IL-13-induced inflammation on different steps along the infectious cycle of SARS-CoV-2 and virus-induced lung disease.
Methods
Differentiated primary airway culture
Primary epithelial cells were isolated from the human trachea and bronchi by enzymatic digestion and were grown at air-liquid interface (ALI) using previously described method.30 Passage −0 primary differentiated human airway epithelia (HAE) from 3 human subjects (non-smokers with no history of chronic or recent acute lung disease) were obtained from the University of Iowa Cells and Tissue Core. Subject A was a 69 y/o female, Subject B was a 41 y/o female, and Subject C was a 63 y/o male. Cell cultures were treated with 20 ng/mL recombinant IL-13 (R&D Systems, 213-ILB-100/CF) or 20 ng/mL recombinant IL-17 (R&D Systems, 210-TA) combined with 10 ng/mL tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα, R&D Systems, 317-ILB-050) for 4 or 55 days. The cytokines were applied to both apical and basolateral side of HAE. The cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI 0.1), the strain isolated from the first US patient (2019-nCoV/USA–WA1/2020, GenBank:MN985325.1) for 6 or 72 h.
LLC-MK2 cells (ATCC, CCL-7) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, GIBCO, 11-965-092) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, GIBCO, A5670701). VeroE6-TMPRSS2-ACE2 cells (BEI resources, NR-54970) and Vero E6 cells (ATCC, CRL-1586) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. All cells are incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Validation of cell lines: all non-primary cell lines were obtained from commercial vendors which conduct internal validation, we confirmed this information in the documentation received. Moreover, cell lines are replenished every 20 every passages. Cell cultures are inspected daily for sterility, maintenance of adherence, and distinctive morphology. Cell lines are regularly screened for mycoplasma contamination.
Flow cytometry (neutralisation assay)
For neutralising assay, SeV-eGFP and VSV-eGFP-SARS-CoV-2 were pre-incubated with 100 μL apical wash (AW) harvested from the surface of IL-13-pretreated or Vehicle (PBS)-pretreated ALI cultured HAE cells. Following a 2 h incubation, the SeV-eGFP-AW and VSV-eGFP-SARS-CoV-2-AW mixtures were added to LLC-MK2 cells or VeroE6-TMPRSS2-ACE2 cells, respectively for 1 h at 37 °C. Next the mixtures were removed from cells, replaced with fresh complete DMEM medium, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and 72 h respectively. At indicated times, cells were harvested for quantification of GFP-positive cells by flow cytometry using BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). “Neutralising activity” represents the number of GFP+ cells detected after incubation of virus in AW from IL-13 or vehicle treated HAE.
Virus
The 2019n-CoV/USA-WA1/2019 (WT-SARS-CoV-2) was kindly provided by BEI Resources. SARS2-N501YMA30, a mouse adapted SARS-CoV-2 virus was generated by serial passage through mouse lungs 30 times as reported previously.31 Two replication-competent GFP-expressing recombinant viruses were used: Sendai virus-eGFP (SeV-eGFP), a gift from Dr. Ultan Power32 and VSV-eGFP-SARS-CoV-2, a gift from Dr. Wendy Maury. These two recombinant viruses were prepared as described in previous reports.32, 33, 34, 35
Virus titration
Viral loads in tissues were measured by plaque assay using VeroE6 cells. In brief, tissues were homogenised in DMEM with one freeze–thaw cycle for releasing intracellular virions. 100 μL homogenised tissues were serially diluted with 900 μL DMEM, i.e., 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5. We added 200 μL of the sample dilutions to designated 12-wells and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After removing inocula, 1.2% low melting point agarose (IBI Scientific, IB70056) and 2× DMEM media in a 1:1 (V/V) ratio were overlaid on the monolayer cell surface for 3 days of incubation. On third day, the ovverlay was removed and virus-induced plaques were visualised by 0.1% crystal violet staining. Viral titres were expressed as the number of plaque-forming units (PFU) per mL tissue.
Immunofluorescence
Primary cultured HAE were washed with PBS (GIBCO, 14194-144), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 15714S) in PBS for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton-X (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A16046AE) in PBS for 20 min and then blocked with 2% BSA (Research Products International, A30075100.0) in Superblock (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 37515) for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the cultures were incubated with primary antibody apically for 1.5 h at 37 °C, then incubated with secondary antibody apically for 1 h at 37 °C. Both primary and secondary antibody were diluted in 2% BSA and Superblock. Samples were labelled with following primary antibodies: mouse anti-MUC5AC (1:2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA5-12178), rabbit anti-SARS-CoV-2 N protein (1:1000, Sino Biological, 40588-T62) and mouse anti-acetylated α-tubulin (1:200, Sigma–Aldrich, T7451). The secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 or 488 (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11004 or 11008). The cultures were washed with PBS, mounted in Vectashield antifade mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H-1200-10) and cover-slipped.
Validation of antibodies used: all antibodies were obtained from commercial sources, and their QC information is archived. We also assessed our prior quality controls including single antibody staining prior to use in multi-antibody assays, antigen competition, and characterisation in samples with known expression or lack of expression of the target antigen as needed.
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Tissues were placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (VWR International, 77507-018) for 3–5 days, dehydrated through a progressive series of alcohol and xylene baths, paraffin-embedded, sectioned (∼4 μm) and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stains for general examination or diastase-pretreated periodic Schiff (dPAS) stain for mucus detection.36 Tissues were examined by a veterinary pathologist using the post-examination masking technique.37 Healthy mouse lung lacks airway goblet cells in airways. To test the effects of IL-13 we ordinally scored cross-sectioned airways for the severity of Goblet (mucous) cell changes: 0—absent; 1—scattered; 2—circumferential around airway; 3—Circumferential and partial mucus accumulation in lumen; and 4—Circumferential and overt mucus obstruction of airway. Acute lung injury was defined by the extent of lesions (oedema/hyaline membranes) consistent with the effusive phase of diffuse alveolar disease: 0—absent; 1—0–25%; 2—26–50%; 3—51–75% and 4—>75% of tissue fields. Immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 N protein was conducted as previously done with minor optimisations.31 Briefly, paraffin-embedded sections were treated for epitope retrieval (citrate buffer, pH 6.0, 110 °C for 15 min) followed by primary anti-SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody (1:4000 × 15 min, rabbit polyclonal, Sino Biological 40143-T62), secondary antibody kit (DAKO Rabbit Envision HRP System), and chromogen (DAKO DAB Plus). Ordinal scoring for lung N protein was performed as previously: 0—absent; 1—0–25%; 2—26–50%; 3—51–75% and 4—>75% of tissue fields.
Single-cell RNA-seq library preparation
Cells were fixed, permeabilized and 8 cDNA sub-libraries were generated using the SPLiT-seq38 protocol V3.0 from Parse Biosciences following the manufacturer's instructions. Concentration and fragment size of the pooled cDNA library was measured using Qubit HS and High Sensitivity DNA Assay. Fragment size for the library was ∼430 bp which falls within the recommended 150–850 bp.
Single-cell RNA sequencing
Pair-end reads sequencing was performed on the pooled library using two lanes of Illumina NovaSeq 6000 S1 Flowcell instrument (approximately 800 million PE reads per lane) for 300 cycles to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. The sequencing was configured for 66 nt (transcript sequence) read1, 94 nt (cell-specific barcodes and UMI) read2, and an additional 6 nt read1 index for sub-library indices as described in the manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing was performed by the University of Iowa Genomics Facility.
Single-cell RNA-seq data processing
Human- SARS-CoV-2 combined reference genome was made using human reference genome-build GRCh38.p13 (accession GCF_000001405.39) and SARS-CoV-2/human/USA/WA-CDC-WA1/2020 isolate (GenBank assembly accession: GCA_009937905.1). Pair-ends reads obtained from Illumina NovaSeq were processed and mapped to the human-SARS-CoV-2 combined reference genome using STAR and Samtools package implemented via Split Bio data analysis pipeline; split-pipe v0.7.5p in Amazon Web Services platform according to the suggested data processing protocol by the manufacturer. Output files (a matrix with cell-gene counts, cell metadata file and genes information file) from all 8 sub-libraries were imported and merged into a single Seurat object using Seurat v4.0.1 in R v4.0.5 for further analyses. Low-quality and duplicated cells were filtered and only cells with: 1) % of mitochondrial genes <0.5, 2) 2500 < UMI counts per cells >40,000, and 3) 1000 < number of genes per cells >8000 was selected for downstream analysis (Supplementary Figure S1).
Identifying Cell types in single-cell RNA-seq data
Cell types were identified using the combination of: 1) cells clusters identified by Seurat's FindClusters function (uses shared nearest neighbour modularity optimisation based clustering algorithm; identified 19 clusters using resolution 0.6), 2) expression of airway epithelial cell-type specific markers: Basal (KRT5, TP63, KRT6A), Ciliated (FOXJ1, TPPP3), Secretory (SCGB3A1, BPIFA1), Goblet (MUC5AC, LYZ, ADRA2A, PRB2, FCGBP), Ionocytes (FOXI1, ASCL3), Mitotic (MKI67, TOP2A), Pulmonary Neuro Endocrine cells (CALCA, ASCL1), Intermediate (clusters expression basal, ciliated and secretory cell markers), and 3) identification of non-canonical marker genes with enriched expression in each cluster using Seurat's FindMarkers function. Since, not all goblet cells clustered together in a specific cluster, to further expand the number of goblet cells, the sum of the log normalised counts for goblet cells specific markers (MUC5AC, LYZ, ADRA2A, PRB2, FCGBP) was calculated. Cells were labelled as goblet if: 1) cells were present in clusters 1,13 or 16 (containing majority of secretory cells) and 2) sum of normalised goblet cell marker genes were greater than 2 (Supplementary Figure S2).
Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected cells and analysis of background contamination in combinatorial single-cell RNA-seq data
Whereas single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) can accurately quantify transcripts, it may also be affected by background levels of transcripts present outside of cells during the RNA-seq library preparation; it is particularly important to control for background contamination when quantifying transcripts that may be highly abundant in some cells but not others.
To estimate background contamination using empirical data, we took advantage of our dataset containing sequencing data from primary airway epithelial cells from both male and female humans, and from samples exposed vs. unexposed to SARS-CoV-2. First, we calculated % of misassigned UMIs per cell using Y chromosome genes (DDX3Y, EIF1AY, KDM5D, RPS4Y1, TTTY15, UTY, ZFY, NLGN4Y, LINC00278, LOC107987344) and donor information (Donor C: male, Donor A/B: female); if a “cell” from female sample showed high expression of Y chromosome genes, it was labelled as misassigned. Then using SARS-CoV-2 viral transcripts genes (orf1ab, orf7a, orf8, orf3a, orf10, orf6, E, M, N, S) and viral exposure information, we calculated % of misassigned UMIs per cell; if a cell from group unexposed to SARS-CoV-2 showed expression of SARS-CoV-2 viral transcripts, the UMI was labelled as misassigned. We then plotted % of misassigned UMI per cell for each Y chromosome and viral transcripts genes against total gene counts in our data. Interestingly, spurious detection of viral transcripts may occur at higher rates than for host genes, however, comparison of (total UMI count vs. genes) shows the majority is occurring in low depth cells, etc., which allowed us to establish a threshold for filtering cells (Supplementary Figure S3, a and b). We then used stringent criteria based on clustering and on our background contamination analysis to define a cell as “infected”. We first calculated the sum of SARS-CoV-2 transcripts (orf1ab, orf7a, orf8, orf3a, orf10, orf6, E, M, N, S) using normalised counts for each cell and applied the following criteria: 1) belongs to the cluster with high counts of SARS-CoV-2 transcripts as identified by UMAP, 2) belongs to a sample infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus, and 3) sum of SARS-CoV-2 transcript normalised count is greater than 3 (Supplementary Figure S3, c–f).
Mixed model DEG analysis
Differential expression analysis was performed using a generalised linear mixed model. The gene count for each cell was assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution. The log of the expected count was a linear function with fixed effects for treatment and donor, where donor was included to account for pairing of treatments from the same donor, and a random effect for sample, to account for batch effects. The log of the total number of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) for each cell was used as an offset to account for different depth of information between cells. The R package lme439 was used to fit the model, and log2 fold change and p-value for each gene were the estimated coefficient and Wald test p-value for treatment, respectively. After testing all genes, adjusted p-values were obtained using the Benjamini-Hochberg criterion to control false discovery rate (FDR).40
Bulk RNA-Sequencing
Total RNA was extracted and purified from harvested mice lungs using RNeasy plus mini kit from QIAGEN. cDNA library was prepared using standard Illumina TruSeq stranded mRNA protocol. Concentration and fragment size of the library was measured using Qubit HS and High Sensitivity DNA Assay. The pooled library was sequenced on one lane of Illumina NovaSeq 6000 SP Flowcell instrument for paired end reads. Library preparation, quality control and sequencing were the done by the University of Iowa Genomics Facility. Base cells were demultiplexed and converted to FASTQ format by the sequencing core. The processed fastq files were pseudo aligned to mouse reference.41 Mapped raw reads were reported in transcripts per million (TPM) by Kallisto. For downstream analysis, output from Kallisto was summarised into gene-level estimates using tximport v1.10.1 in R v3.5.1.42 Differential gene expression was performed using iDEP v0.9243 and DESeq2 v1.30.44 Pathway analysis was done using fast gene set enrichment analysis (fgsea) and msigdbr v7.5.145 packages in R v3.5.1.
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis—upstream regulator analysis
Upstream regulator analysis was done using QIAGEN IPA46 with the confidence level set to experimentally observed only. Genes included passed a threshold of an adjusted p value of less than 0.1 and a log2 absolute fold change of greater than 1. Upstream regulators were sorted according to the predicted activation Z score.
Mouse model
Adult C57BL/6J mice (5–9-month, n = 12–13, half male/female) and 6-10-week BALB/c mice (n = 4, all female) were intranasally infected by 1000 PFU of SARS2-N501YMA30 after a 4-day pretreatment of 2.5 μg/day intranasal IL-13 or vehicle in a 50 μL volume as previously reported19; this 50 μL volume for intranasal instillation has been found to result in approximately 70% delivery to the lungs, with the rest likely ingested via the GI tract.20,21 6–10-week (young) BALB/c mice and 5–9-month (adult) C57BL/6J mice were acquired from the Jackson Laboratory. The Pla2g2d−/− mouse strain was previously reported.47 Mice were maintained in the Animal Care Unit at the University of Iowa under standard dark/light cycle conditions, ambient temperature, and humidity. We used each single animal as the experimental unit. Sample size for WT vs. Pla2g2d−/− studies was determined using 10-day survival post-infection as a primary outcome. Based on our early experiments (including Fig. 4) and conservatively expecting mortality rates of 20% in untreated mice and 80% in IL-13 treated mice, ten mice per group provides 80% power to detect a difference in mortality. Our study was not powered to detect the effect of sex as a variable. Mice were randomly allocated to treatment arm using random number tables. No animals were excluded. Confounders such as animal cage/location or treatment order were not controlled. The corresponding authors were aware of group allocation during initial allocation.
Fig. 4.
IL-13 enhances SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease in vivo. 6-10 week-old BALB/c mice were intranasally infected by 1000 PFU of SARS2-N501YMA30 after a 4-day pretreatment of 2.5 μg/day intranasal IL-13 or vehicle. (a) Survival rate and (b) weight were monitored daily. n = 6 mice for each group; mean ± SEM; for % starting weight of Veh + Virus vs. IL-13+Virus, ∗p ˂ 0.05; p-values in weight change and survival curve are Student's unpaired t test and log-rank (Mantel–Cox) tests, respectively. (c) Quantification of virus loads at 5 days post-infection (dpi) in homogenised mouse lungs by plaque assay using VeroE6 cells. n = lung tissue from 4 mice; p value: Student's unpaired t test. (d) Representative sections from uninfected and infected mouse lungs treated with vehicle or IL-13 treatment and stained with diastase-pretreated periodic acid-Schiff (dPAS). Note the increased dPAS + staining of the epithelium (arrows) and within the airway (asterisk), (e) Representative sections from infected mouse lungs with vehicle or IL-13 treatment and stained with H&E (top) or immunostained for SARS-CoV-2 N protein. Note the oedema (asterisk, top right image) and hyaline membranes (arrows, top right image). Note the expansive N protein staining in the bottom right vs. bottom left representative images. Histopathology staining from 4 mice/group. (f) Ordinal histopathological scoring of airway goblet cell metaplasia (mucus-producing goblet cells) (top panel), edema/hyaline membrane (middle panel), and SARS-CoV-2 N protein expression (bottom panel) in lungs from mock or infected mice. Mean ± SEM; ∗p ˂ 0.05; p value: Student's unpaired t test.
LC-MS/MS
Mouse lungs were harvested and homogenised into 1 mL methanol (Fisher Scientific, A456-500)/lung tissue using a tissue homogeniser with beads. After centrifugation at 16,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, 200 μL supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and diluted with HPLC-grade water (Sigma–Aldrich, 270733) to a final volume of 2 mL of 10% methanol (V/V). 0.1 ng/μL internal standard cocktail was added in diluted samples and serially diluted primary standards (4.76, 0.476, 0.0476, 0.00476, 0.000476 ng/μL). For primary standards AA (90010), PGD2 (12010), PGE2 (14010), 6-keto-PGF1α (15210), PGF2α (16010), LTB4 (20110), TXB2 (19030), 15(S)-HEPE (32710), 17(S)-HDHA (10009799) and 15d-PGJ2 (18570), matched internal standards were AA-d8 (390010), PGD2-d4 (312010), PGE2-d4 (314010), 6-keto-PGF1α-d4 (315210), PGF2α-d4 (316010), LTB4-d4 (320110), TXB2-d4 (319030), 15(S)-HEPE-d5 (31221), 17(S)-HDHA-d5 (29797) and 15d-PGJ2-d4 (318570), respectively, all purchased from Cayman Chemical and added at the aforementioned concentration. Then, samples and primary standards were subjected to solid phase extraction using Strata-X 33 μm Polymeric Reversed Phase columns (60 mg/3 mL, Phenomenex, 8L-S100-UBJ). After pre-washing columns with 3 mL methanol and water, each sample was loaded on the column, and lipid extracts were eluted with 1 mL methanol, vacuum dried, and suspended in 100 μL of mobile phase A. Ten eicosanoids were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (130 Å, 1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, Waters, 186002352) using series dilution with mobile phase A (63:37:0.02% water/acetonitrile (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 047138. K2)/formic acid (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 28905)) and phase B (1:1 acetonitrile/isopropanol ((Thermo Fisher Scientific, 383910025)) at a 300 μL/min flow rate. Each eicosanoid was identified by the retention time of its corresponding primary standard.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using Student's unpaired or paired 2-tailed t test or one-way ANOVA test. Parametric tests were conducted on log-transformed data when necessary to reduce skewness or homogenise variance. Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used for mortality analysis. For RNA-seq data, p-values were corrected using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR. For scRNA-seq data, differential gene expression analysis was performed using generalised linear mixed model (see section above for details). For bulk RNA-seq, differential gene expression was performed using DESeq2 in iDEP v0.92. Data are represented as mean or mean ± SEM or mean ± SD. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethics statement
Primary airway epithelia cells were obtained from the University of Iowa Cells and Tissue Core.
Mouse studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee of the University of Iowa following the protocol #2071795. Mice were maintained in the Animal Care Unit at the University of Iowa under standard dark/light cycle conditions, ambient temperature, and humidity.
Data availability
Human scRNA-seq and mouse bulk RNA-seq data has been deposited in the NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Superseries GSE249308).
Role of funders
Funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analyses, interpretation or writing of report.
Results
IL-13-induced inflammation protects human airway epithelia from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro
Previous studies showed that type 2 airway inflammation decreases expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2) but increases expression of the entry factor TMPRSS2 (Transmembrane serine protease 2) in airway epithelia.48 In contrast, the pleiotropic cytokine TNFα and the type 17 cytokine IL-17 may have the opposite effect in human cells.49,50 We hypothesised that IL-13-induced inflammation would protect primary human airway epithelia (HAE) from SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas IL-17 with TNFα would synergistically enhance susceptibility to the virus. We pre-treated HAE cultured at the air-liquid interface with 20 ng/mL recombinant IL-13 or 20 ng/mL recombinant IL-17 combined with 10 ng/mL tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) for 4 or 55 days. As previously shown by us and others, the selected doses induce in vitro effects consistent with those on epithelial cells in vivo.19,51, 52, 53, 54 Moreover, we previously showed that gene expression changes without changes in cellular composition are expected on day 4 of IL-13 treatment. In contrast, treatment for multiple weeks increase the proportion of goblet cells (“goblet cell metaplasia”) while reducing the proportion ciliated cells, with minimal to no changes in total cell numbers within the cultures.19
The cytokines were applied to both apical and basolateral cell surfaces. We then infected HAE with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI 0.1) and analysed the cells 6 or 72 hours post-infection (Fig. 1a). We measured viral titres in apical washes and used flow cytometry to enumerate cells positive for the nucleocapsid protein (N-protein) 72 hours post-infection (hpi). We found that IL-13, but not IL-17+TNFα exposed cells, were protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection when treated for 55 days. These data suggest that IL-13-induced epithelial remodelling19 protects human airway epithelial cells from SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1b and c).
Fig. 1.
IL-13-induced inflammation protects human airway epithelia from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. (a) Experimental conditions/in-vitro model: IL-13 (20 ng/mL) or IL-17 (20 ng/mL) + TNFα (10 ng/mL) were added to well-differentiated air-liquid interface (ALI) primary human airway epithelia (HAE) for 4 or 55 days prior to infection with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI 0.1). Samples were analysed at 6 or 72 hours post-infection (hpi). (b) Viral titers/PFU at 72 hpi. Data represent the mean ± SEM and p value for one-way ANOVA test. n = 3 (c) Flow cytometry showing % of cells expressing N protein at 72 hpi. n = epithelia from 3 human donors, p value shown for paired t-test. (a) was created with Biorender.com.
IL-13 induced GCM protects HAE from SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by decreasing the abundance of receptor-expressing cells
Our data show that IL-13-induced inflammation protects HAE from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Previous studies have shown that type 2 (including IL-13-driven) inflammation affects the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry factors ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in airway epithelia.55 We hypothesised that IL-13 induced GCM protects HAE from SARS-CoV-2 infection by decreasing the abundance of receptor-expressing cells, thus limiting viral-epithelial binding or cellular entry. To simultaneously measure cellular composition and expression of multiple entry factors, we conducted scRNA-seq of a subset of the HAE samples from three subjects described in Fig. 1; we included the samples treated with vehicle or IL-13 (both time points), and for each condition we included mock- and SARS-CoV-2-infected epithelia at 6 and at 72 hours post-infection (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2).
Using our scRNA-seq data, we measured the proportion of major cell types in uninfected vehicle- and IL-13-treated (55 days) samples. We found that compared to vehicle, IL-13-treated samples had significantly fewer secretory and ciliated cells, and a greater abundance of basal and goblet cells (Fig. 2a). Next, we measured the transcript expression of the viral entry factors ACE2, TMPRSS2, and furin in each of those major cell types from vehicle and IL-13 (55 days) treated groups. We found that IL-13 did not affect ACE2 expression in ciliated cells. IL-13 did decrease ACE2 expression in basal cells, although basal cells are not considered primary viral infection targets. The expression of TMPRSS2 was higher in IL-13-treated secretory cells, whereas FURIN expression was unaffected (Fig. 2b). Overall, we found that while IL-13 does not affect the expression of ACE2 in ciliated cells, it does decrease the overall abundance of ciliated cells.
Fig. 2.
IL-13-induced GCM protects HAE from SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by decreasing the abundance of receptor-expressing cells. (a) Proportion of common cell types in vehicle- and IL-13-treated (20 ng/mL, 55 days) samples (no virus exposure) determined by single cell RNA-seq data. n = 3, p-value shown for unpaired t test. (b) Dot plot showing the effect of IL-13 treatment (20 ng/mL, 55 days) on viral entry factor expression in uninfected HAE. Size of the dot represents % of the cell expressing the gene and colour scale shows the average expression level. n = 3 donors (c) Representative image of immunofluorescence confocal microscopy for DAPI (nuclei, blue), N-protein (virus, green), and MUC5AC (goblet cells, red, top) or acetylated alpha tubulin (ciliated cells, red, bottom).
To further determine the effects of IL-13 on SARS-CoV-2 infection of HAE, we performed confocal microscopy for DAPI (nuclei), N-protein (virus), MUC5AC (goblet cells), and acetylated alpha tubulin (Ac-α-Tub, ciliated cells) in Vehicle and IL-13-treated (4 days, 55 days) HAE at 72 hpi with SARS-CoV-2. A representative image for each condition is shown in Fig. 2c. We found that epithelia treated with IL-13 for 55 days had 1) an increase in goblet cells, shown by MUC5AC (red, top row), 2) a decrease in the abundance of ciliated cells, shown by Ac-α-Tub (red, bottom row) and, 3) a significant decrease in SARS-CoV-2 virus antigen, shown by N-protein (green). The effects on cellular composition follow the previously described patterns quantified in19; moreover, they match the quantification obtained from scRNA-seq data, viral titres, and N-protein flow cytometry in Figs. 1b, c and 2a. Moreover, immunostaining for ACE2 protein (Supplementary Figure S4) supported the scRNA-seq finding (Fig. 1B) that IL-13 decreases the abundance of ACE2+ ciliated cells but not the abundance of ACE2 in each cell. In summary, our findings suggest that IL-13-induced GCM may protect airway epithelia from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, in part by decreasing the abundance of ciliated cells which are one of the main targets for SARS-CoV-2 tropism.
IL-13-induced goblet cell metaplasia (GCM) does not affect surface viral neutralisation or viral replication in primary human airway epithelial cells
Our data suggest that IL-13-induced GCM reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection in HAE by decreasing ciliated cell abundance; alternatively, IL-13 may also affect viral binding to epithelia or replication in infected cells. Previous reports show that IL-13 can modulate innate immune factors in the airway surface liquid that can neutralise viruses and kill bacteria.56,57 We hypothesised that airway surface liquid from epithelia with IL-13 induced goblet cell metaplasia neutralises the virus to protect HAE from SARS-CoV-2. We collected airway surface liquid (ASL) from 6 vehicle- and IL-13-exposed (55 days) donor epithelia and performed a neutralisation assay using Sendai virus (mouse parainfluenza virus type 1, previously shown to be neutralised by airway surface liquid32) and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped VSV at various MOI (Fig. 3). We found that ASL from IL-13 exposed HAE neutralised Sendai virus significantly at MOI 5 and 10 with average neutralising activity of 80% and 60%, respectively. In contrast, the neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped VSV by ASL from IL-13 treated HAE was less than 0.5% at all MOI tested. Because the neutralising activity of IL-13 treated HAE was minimal, it is unlikely that IL-13 induced changes in secreted antiviral factors can explain the protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection after IL-13.
Fig. 3.
IL-13-induced goblet cell metaplasia (GCM) does not affect viral neutralisation at the airway surface or viral replication. (a) Neutralisation of Sendai virus (left) and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped VSV by airway surface liquid (ASL) collected from Vehicle and IL-13 treated (20 ng/mL) HAE. n = epithelia from 6 or 2 humans, p-value shown for Student's unpaired t test and data represent mean ± SD. (b) Volcano plot for IL-13 (20 ng/mL, 55 days) vs. Vehicle pre-treated ciliated cells at 6 hpi with SARS-CoV-2. Dotted line represents cutoffs for significant genes (log2FC ± 2, adj p-value = 0.1). Significant genes and ISGs directly affected by virus shown. (c) Effect of IL-13 treatment (20 ng/mL, 55 days) on detection of SARS-CoV-2 transcript-positive cells in each major epithelial cell type. (d) Violin plot of S transcript in Vehicle vs. IL-13 (20 ng/mL, 55 days) treated HAE at 72 hpi with SARS-CoV-2. Each dot represents a SARS-CoV-2 transcript-positive cell and the bar at the bottom shows the proportion of cells with zero expression in each group.
We next hypothesised that IL-13 affected expression of the subset of interferon stimulated genes that directly impact viral replication.58 We measured the differential response of IL-13- vs. vehicle-pre-treated cells to SARS-CoV-2 at 6 hpi using scRNA-seq (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2) and mixed model analysis (described in methods); we focused on ciliated cells because they are the initial target for infection by SARS-CoV-2.59 We found that IL-13-treated HAE responded to SARS-CoV-2 differentially at 6 hpi as shown by the number of significant genes in Fig. 3b, however, we found that IL-13 did not affect the expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that directly inhibit viral replication.58
The data above (lower “bulk” viral titre and less infected cells in epithelia with IL-13-induced GCM, without changes in antiviral gene expression or in ASL virus-neutralising activity) suggest a decreased proportion of infected cells in IL-13-treated HAE; additionally, the viral load in each infected cell may be decreased if antiviral mechanisms are enhanced. To determine if decreased infection in epithelia with IL-13-induced GCM was due to a) lower proportion of infected cells, b) lower viral load per infected cell, or c) a combination of both mechanisms, we measured detection of SARS-CoV-2 transcript-positive cells in each major epithelial cell type and viral transcript levels per cell 72 h post exposure to SARS-CoV-2. We used a stringent method to account for background scRNA-seq library contamination (Supplementary Figure S3). We found that IL-13 decreased the abundance of SARS-CoV-2 transcript-positive cells in all major epithelial cell types (Fig. 3c); however, the average levels of SARS-CoV-2 transcripts in infected cells (“viral gene load per cell”) did not differ between vehicle- and IL-13-treated epithelia (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Figure S5). Using mixed model analysis, we identified genes induced by 72 h of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in vehicle and IL-13 (4 days) treated infected ciliated cells. We also characterised the differential response of IL-13 treatment in infected ciliated cells exposed to SARS-CoV-2 for 72 h (Supplementary Figure S6, Supplementary Table S1). In summary, our results show that IL-13 induced GCM affects neither viral neutralisation by ASL nor viral replication and suggest that IL-13 affects either viral-epithelial binding or cellular entry. Taken together with the data in Figs. 1 and 2, the data suggest that IL-13-induced GCM protects HAE from SARS-CoV-2 by decreasing the abundance of receptor-expressing cells and not by modulating antiviral activity acutely.
IL-13 enhances SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease in vivo
IL-13 can induce airway inflammation including goblet cell metaplasia, sub-epithelial fibrosis, and immune cell recruitment; however, it also possesses anti-inflammatory properties. The anti-inflammatory properties of IL-13 include the polarisation and activation of immunosuppressive M2 (arginase- and macrophage mannose receptor–CD206-positive) macrophages and the differentiation of regulatory T cells, which are compromised in severe patients with COVID-19.60, 61, 62 We hypothesised that IL-13-induced dysfunction of immune responses contributes to increased susceptibility to COVID-19. Therefore, we infected young (6–10 weeks old) BALB/c mice with 1000 PFUs of SARS2-N501YMA30, a mouse adapted SARS-CoV-2,31 after a pretreatment of 2.5 μg/day intranasal IL-13 (previously shown to induce lower airway goblet cell metaplasia and other innate immune changes by us19 and others20, 21, 22, 23, 24) or Vehicle for 4 days (Fig. 4). Since IL-13 treatment can change the cellular composition of airway epithelia by increasing goblet cell and decreasing ciliated cell abundance, we examined the tissue infection pattern of SARS2-N501YMA30 at the early time point of 2 days post infection in vehicle-vs. IL-13-treated mice; our data (Supplementary Figure S7) show that SARS2-N501YMA30 infects ciliated and non-ciliated cells at the airway epithelial surface and in the alveolar compartment, similar to SARS-CoV-2 infection in human lungs. Moreover, we compared SARS2-N501YMA30 to the B.1.351 strain of SARS-CoV-2 which can spontaneously infect mouse lungs when very high virus inoculum is used (and is not transmissible to other mice); we found that SARS2-N501YMA30 and B.1.351 infection had similar patterns of tissue tropism and response to IL-13 treatment.
IL-13-treated mice had higher mortality and lost more weight upon infection compared to Vehicle (Fig. 4a and b). This result complements findings from a study showing that blockade of IL-13 with an antibody decreases SARS-CoV-2-induced mortality.5 To assess viral load, we titered virus in lung tissue from IL-13- or Vehicle-pretreated mice on day 5 (Fig. 4c). Consistent with faster disease progression, elevated viral loads were present in lung tissue of IL-13-pretreated mice. Histopathological analyses of tissue from mock infected mice and infected mice at day 5 post infection revealed evident goblet cell metaplasia and lung injury in IL-13-pretreated mice, with hypersecretion of mucus and evidence of acute lung injury (pulmonary oedema/hyaline membranes) (Fig. 4d–f). Next, we performed bulk RNA-seq on lung tissue from SARS2-N501YMA30 infected and uninfected mice, pretreated with either IL-13 or Vehicle. We conducted differential gene expression (DGE) analysis and pathway analysis to identify the effects of IL-13 on the response to SARS2-N501YMA30. Pathway analysis using the GO: Biological process pathway database revealed downregulation of antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen genes in IL-13-treated mice. Some other downregulated pathways in IL-13-treated mice were complement activation, cytolysis, xenobiotic catabolic and xenobiotic metabolic processes (Supplementary Figure S8, Supplementary Table S2). Qualitative histopathological analysis shows that samples from vehicle-treated mice developed regions of consolidation with atelectasis, increased cellularity by leukocytes and cellular debris with oedema. In contrast, samples from IL-13-treated mice lacked regions of consolidation, had increased oedema and hyaline membranes (Supplementary Figure S9). In addition, we performed immunohistochemical detection of AIF1/IBA1 which is expressed by M2 macrophages. We found that samples from the IL-13-treated mice had an increase in AIF1+ cells; the AIF1+ cells were predominantly peri-venous in samples from mock-infected animals but were more diffusely localised with virus infection (Supplementary Figure S10).
These findings may explain the increased viral titre in IL-13-treated mouse lungs compared to the vehicle group. Further, they suggest that pre-existing IL-13-induced inflammation may impair viral clearance or affects infection kinetics in addition to shifting the immune and epithelial response to infection.
IL-13 induces dysregulation of eicosanoids in vivo
Our data reveal a discrepancy between the effects of IL-13 in airway epithelia in vitro (with only epithelial cells present) and in mice in vivo (epithelial, immune, mesenchymal cells, etc.). We hypothesised that the effects of IL-13 would vary between human airway epithelia in vitro and murine lungs in vivo. We carried out transcriptional profiling of primary airway epithelial cells (21-day IL-13/Vehicle treatment) and lung tissues of non-infected mice (4-day IL-13/Vehicle treatment) by bulk RNA-seq and then identified and compared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the IL-13 and vehicle groups (Fig. 5a). This analysis revealed that 457 and 1361 genes were differentially expressed at a p˂0.05 between IL-13 and Vehicle-treated primary airway epithelial cells and mice lungs, respectively. Whereas some genes responded similarly in vitro and in vivo (a selected sub-set of genes known to participate in IL-13-induced inflammation is shown in Fig. 5a), there were many differences between the groups.
Fig. 5.
IL-13 induces dysregulation of eicosanoids in vivo. (a) RNA-seq analysis of IL-13 (20 ng/mL)- or vehicle-treated primary human airway epithelial cells (21-day IL-13/Vehicle treatment, in vitro) and lungs of 6–10 week-old BALB/c mice (4-day, 2.5 μg/day intranasal IL-13/Vehicle treatment, in vivo). Volcano plots of differential gene expression analysis in vitro and in vivo of the effect of IL-13 compared to vehicle. n = epithelia from 8 humans (left); n = lung tissue from 4 mice (right). Selected genes relevant to goblet cell metaplasia are labelled in red. (b) Ingenuity Upstream Regulator Analysis of DEGs in IL-13- or vehicle-treated samples in vitro and in vivo. Predicted upstream regulators are sorted by absolute Z-score. PTGER2 is highlighted as the top predicted regulator activated in vivo but not in vitro. (c) List of top 15 eicosanoids biosynthesis-associated phospholipase genes ranked from highest to lowest magnitude of IL-13 response. (d) Concentrations of prostaglandins in lungs of 8 week-old BALB/c mice treated with IL-13 or vehicle measured by LC-MS/MS calculated according to standard curves and normalised to internal standards (0.1 ng/μL for each I.S.). n = lung sample from 8 mice; mean ± SEM; p value is shown from Student's unpaired t test.
We hypothesised that the discrepancy between the effect of IL-13 in vivo in murine lungs vs. in vitro in human airway epithelia was due to factors missing from the in vitro model; this may include a non-epithelial cell type or processes that require non-epithelial cell participation. To identify candidate drivers of IL-13-enhanced SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease, we conducted a comparative upstream regulator analysis (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis) of the response to IL-13 between in vitro epithelial cells and in vivo murine lungs. The data showed that both in vitro and in vivo, the top predicted upstream regulators of the effects of IL-13 on the transcriptome included both IL-4, IL-13 as expected, and other targets of the IL-13 signalling pathway including CSF2 and NFkB (Fig. 5b).63,64 These data validate the use of Upstream Regulator Analysis to predict drivers of transcriptional responses in the lungs. Next, we examined upstream regulators predicted as differentially activated in vitro and in vivo. The results suggest that PTGER2 is activated by IL-13 in vivo, but not in vitro (Fig. 5b). PTGER2 is a receptor of prostaglandin E2, highly expressed in kidney, lung, and the central nervous system, playing an important role in the resolution of inflammation and downregulation of immune responses.65,66 Prostaglandins E2 and D2 are important mediators of responses to infection by SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and RSV in airway epithelia.31,47,67, 68, 69, 70 Moreover, multiple eicosanoid biosynthesis-associated phospholipase genes were upregulated in response to IL-13, suggesting eicosanoids could mediate the observed IL-13-induced enhancement of COVID-19 (Fig. 5c).
Whereas eicosanoid biosynthesis can be transcriptionally regulated, control of eicosanoid levels and function is complex and multifactorial; eicosanoid pathway transcript and effector molecule abundance may correlate in some contexts but not others. We analysed lung tissue from 8-week-old BALB/c mice treated with vehicle or IL-13 using LC-MS/MS to determine whether IL-13 alters lung tissue eicosanoid abundance. LC-MS/MS analysis confirmed induction of the eicosanoid precursor arachidonic acid (AA), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and the specialised pro-resolvin mediator precursor 17(S)-hydroxy docosahexaenoic acid (17(S)-HDHA) in the lungs of non-infected mice treated with IL-13 (Fig. 5d). In humans with mild and severe COVID-19, accumulation of various prostaglandins has also been reported in the serum71 and BAL.70,72 In sum, these data predict that the divergent effects of IL-13 on SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and in vivo are due to dysregulation of eicosanoids.
IL-13 enhances SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease in vivo via eicosanoid dysregulation
We decided to study the role of the secreted Phospholipase A2 Group IID (PLA2G2D) on IL-13-enhanced SARS2-N501YMA30 disease for three main reasons: 1) phospholipase abundance is the first and a rate-limiting step in eicosanoid function,73 2) PLA2G2D was the top phospholipase induced by IL-13 in murine lungs, and 3) we previously showed that PLA2G2D is an important determinant of SARS-CoV (MA15, mouse adapted SARS-CoV) and SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease in mice and its effects are age-dependent.31,47 We hypothesised that PLA2G2D is required for IL-13-enhanced SARS2-N501YMA30 disease in middle-aged C57BL/6J mice.
We infected 8–9 month old wild-type and Pla2g2d−/− C57BL/6J mice with 1000 PFU of SARS2-N501YMA30 (lethal dose). Similar to our findings in young BALB/c mice, we found increased SARS2-N501YMA30-induced mortality and weight loss in mice pretreated with IL-13 relative to vehicle. However, the Pla2g2d−/− mice were protected from IL-13-enhanced SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease, with similar survival rates and weight between IL-13- and Vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 6a). In both wild-type and Pla2g2d−/− mice, IL-13 pre-treatment increased virus titres on day 2 post infection, however, this effect was reduced in Pla2g2d−/− mice, implying the effect of IL-13 on virus load is partially dependent on eicosanoids (Fig. 6b). Overall, these results suggest that IL-13 enhances viral load and worsens the outcome of SARS2-N501YMA30-induced murine disease through Pla2g2d-mediated eicosanoid biosynthesis.
Fig. 6.
IL-13 enhances SARS2-N501YMA30-induced disease in vivo via eicosanoid dysregulation. Adult (5-9-month old) C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and Pla2g2d-knock-out (KO) mice were pretreated with IL-13 and vehicle for 4 days and infected with 1000 PFU SARS2-N501YMA30 on day 5. (a) Survival curve of infected wild type and Pla2g2d-knock-out mice. n = 12–13 mice for each group; mean ± SEM; ∗p ˂ 0.05; p value is shown from log-rank (Mantel–Cox) tests for WT Vehicle vs. WT IL-13. (b) Viral loads in lungs of infected WT and KO mice on day 2 post infection were assessed by plaque assay. n = lung sample from 4 mice; mean ± SEM; p value is shown from Student's unpaired t test.
Discussion
Here, we investigated the effects of IL-13-induced inflammation on multiple steps of the SARS-CoV-2 infectious cycle using both in vitro and in vivo models. Moreover, we generated an atlas of the effects of IL-13- and TNFα/IL-17-induced inflammation on the time course of cellular responses of air-liquid interface primary airway epithelia to SARS-CoV-2 at the single cell level; this dataset contains 48 samples from three human subjects and will be useful to the scientific community. We found that IL-13 protected airway epithelial cells from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro in part by decreasing the abundance of ACE2-expressing ciliated cells. In contrast, IL-13 worsened the outcome of SARS2-N501YMA30-induced murine disease through PLA2G2D-mediated eicosanoid biosynthesis.
Our data show a time-dependent IL-13-driven protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. IL-13 induces airway goblet cell metaplasia characterised by an increase in mucus-secreting goblet cells and a reduction of ciliated cell abundance, as we and others have shown.19,74,75 Consistent with other studies, our results show an IL-13-induced decrease in ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression48; however, our scRNA-seq data demonstrate that the effects of IL-13 on virus receptors and virus entry factors may be predominantly driven by changes in cell composition rather than by receptor expression within each cell type.15,76, 77, 78 SARS-CoV-2 preferentially targets ciliated cells,59,78 whereas MERS-CoV mainly infects goblet cells76,79; interestingly, IL-13 increases susceptibility to MERS-CoV.76 Thus, these findings indicate that IL-13-induced changes in cellular composition modulate airway susceptibility to coronaviruses in vitro.
We found a dichotomy between the effects of IL-13 on airway epithelia in vitro and in mice in vivo. Our finding that IL-13 worsened SARS-CoV-2 in vivo complements a recent study demonstrating that anti-IL-13 antibodies protects K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (developed by the authors80) from severe SARS-CoV-2-induced disease.5 Our results also align with a recent study showing that recipients of dupilumab (an IL-13 receptor blocker) developed lower levels of virus-neutralising antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 immunisation than those who did not receive the drug possibly due to lower viral titres during acute infection.29 To identify potential factors underlying the dichotomy between our in vivo and in vitro studies, we performed a comparative upstream regulator analysis between in vitro HAE cells and in vivo lung tissue bulk RNA-seq data. In addition to expected upstream regulators predicted to be activated both in vitro and in vivo (e.g., IL-4, IL-13, and NFκB signalling), multiple inflammation-associated factors were upregulated in response to IL-13 in mouse lung tissue but not in airway epithelia cells. This suggests that murine COVID-19 is likely enhanced by IL-13-induced dysregulated innate immune responses. Given our recent finding that PLA2G2D and prostaglandin D2 signalling modulate susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2,31 we focused on the upstream regulator analysis prediction of IL-13-enhanced PTGER2 signalling in murine COVID-19, which suggests eicosanoid signalling dysregulation.
Phospholipases, cyclooxygenases, and prostaglandin synthases regulate eicosanoid signalling; eicosanoids interact with their corresponding receptors which are expressed in a cell type-dependent manner.81 The accumulation and activation of eicosanoids in immune effectors including dendritic and mast cells, play an important role in regulating inflammation and immune responses through both paracrine and autocrine actions.81,82 PLA2G2D (phospholipase A2 group 2D) and one of its downstream eicosanoid receptors, prostaglandin D2 receptor (PTGDR), were found to modulate the progression of autoimmune disease and disease driven by various coronaviruses including mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, as previously shown by us and others.31,47,83, 84, 85 Our study reveals that PLA2G2D is essential for IL-13-enhanced murine COVID-19 disease enhancement, suggesting that IL-13-PLA2G2D axis may be targeted to protect individuals from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
However, eicosanoid signalling is complex: 1) phospholipase abundance can be a rate-limiting step, 2) the specific proteinoid synthesised is milieu-dependent and can be mediated by a single cell or a specific combination of cells, 3) the effects of receptor signalling are cell type-specific, and 4) there is significant ligand–receptor activity overlap between the different prostaglandins and their receptors. Moreover, the effects of prostaglandin signalling on virus-induced disease are likely time-dependent. Therefore, it will be essential to further dissect the role of IL-13 and eicosanoid signalling at different doses and time-points in SARS-CoV-2-induced disease.
There are some limitations to our approach. We studied only one variant of SARS-CoV-2; susceptibility to later variants may be affected differently by IL-13 or prostaglandins; we also used only one in vivo model of infection (mouse-adapted virus MA30), other models such as hACE2 transgenic mice80 could provide additional insights. In addition, we only investigated the effect of the type 2 cytokine IL-13 on SARS-CoV-2; the role of IL-13 varies in different inflammatory lung diseases, including in different asthma endotypes.86 Moreover, other stimuli such as interferons which were not applied here could broaden our understanding of how inflammation modulates responses to viral infections. To facilitate mechanistic interpretation, we focused on IL-13 as an inflammatory trigger, however, unlike allergen-sensitisation asthma models, the IL-13 instillation murine model primarily affects innate rather than adaptive immunity. Previous studies have shown that whereas C57BL/6 mice show Th1- and M1-dominant immune response, BALB/c mice show more Th2- and M2 dominant immune responses87,88; strain-dependent differences could confound our in vivo infection model results, however, both young BALB/c and middle-aged C57BL/6 mice showed IL-13-enhanced disease. We also did not explore all possible mechanisms of virus-susceptibility modulation by IL-13 suggested by our transcriptomic analysis. Recent studies reported that IL-13 modulates hyaluronan polysaccharide and keratan sulphate abundance and influences the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and in vivo.5,74,89 Our analysis of the effects of PLA2G2D on IL-13-enhanced MA30 infection is limited to mortality, future studies will explore the cellular basis of this effect. Our experiments were not powered to study the effect of sex, age, genetic ancestry, or other potential confounders on outcomes of viral infection in vitro or in vivo. The discrepancy between our in vitro and in vivo data regarding the effects of IL-13 on viral titres may initially appear as a weakness; however, the results help explain conflicting results in the literature and may potentially explain both the decreased susceptibility to initial infection and the increased severity once infected with SARS-CoV-2 in asthmatics. Studying the effects of eicosanoid signalling in the in vitro model could further clarify the discrepancy between our in vitro and in vivo results. Moreover, studying an in vitro model of alveolar epithelial cells rather than tracheobronchial epithelia, or investigating co-culture models including non-epithelial cells could provide additional perspective.
The incidence of severe COVID-19 is fortunately steadily decreasing as a larger proportion of the population has been vaccinated and/or acquired immunity after infection. However, mechanistic research to better understand how type 2 inflammation affects susceptibility to severe SARS-CoV-2 is fundamental for multiple reasons, including: 1) future pandemic coronaviruses may behave similarly to SARS-CoV-2, 2) knowledge of the role of IL-13 on SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility may be relevant to other current respiratory viruses that cause respiratory failure, 3) understanding the role of currently approved therapies such as IL-4/IL-13 receptor antagonists, on coronavirus susceptibility is important for clinical decision-making during hospitalisation of asthmatics, and 4) the efficacy of current therapies for patients with COVID-19 or other respiratory virus-induced respiratory failure is limited. Our findings have important implications for clinical studies including trials of IL-13 signalling-modifying or eicosanoid-modulating drugs in asthma and respiratory virus-induced lung disease.31,90,91
Contributors
Research study design (S.G., B.X., K.L., C.L.W, A.L.T, D.K.M, S.P., P.B.M., A.A.P.).
Conducting experiments and acquiring data (S.G., B.X., K.L., R.M.G., C.L.W., A.L.T., H.G., G.N., J.Z.). Analysing data (S.G., B.X., K.L., R.G., A.L.T., G.N., D.K.M., S.P., P.B.M., A.A.P.). Manuscript draft review (all authors), writing the manuscript (S.G., B.X., P.B.M., A.A.P.).
Co-first authorship order was assigned based on temporal involvement in the project. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
A.A.P., P.B.M, S.G., and B.X. have accessed and verified the underlying data.
Data sharing statement
Human scRNA-seq and mouse bulk RNA-seq data has been deposited in the NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE249308). Supporting data values are provided as a supplementary table with the paper. Additional data are available from the corresponding author, following publication upon reasonable request.
Declaration of interests
A.A.P. has received research funding from the Ann Theodore Foundation and funding from the Mayo Clinic Foundation and the Ann Theodore Foundation to support travel for academic lectures and research conference attendance, all for work unrelated to this manuscript. P.B.M. has received funding from the National Institutes of Health for work unrelated to this manuscript. The remaining authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Carver Trust COVID-19 Grant and CF Foundation Iowa RDP (A.A.P. and P.B.M). A.A.P was supported by NIH 1R01HL163024 and K01HL140261, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation PEZZUL20A1-KB and the Stead Family Foundation. S.P. was supported by NIH R01AI129269 and the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust. D.K.M. was supported by NIH P01HL152960, R01 HL163556, and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. P.B.M., D.K.M., and S.P. were supported by NIH P01AI060699. The Carver College of Medicine Cell and Tissue (A.A.P.) and Comparative Pathology (D.K.M.) cores are in part supported by the “Center for Gene Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis” (NIH/NIDDK Grant P30 DK054759). We acknowledge the support from Cells and Tissue Core, Comparative Pathology Core, Genomics facility and Animal Care unit of University of Iowa as well as Parse Biosciences.
Footnotes
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105920.
Contributor Information
Paul B. McCray, Jr., Email: paul-mccray@uiowa.edu.
Alejandro A. Pezzulo, Email: alejandro-pezzulo@uiowa.edu.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary Figure S1.
scRNA seq data QC. Figure shows (a) the histogram of log2 (UMIs/Counts per cell), (b) log2 (number of genes per cell), (c) % of Mito genes per cell and (d) scatter plot of UMIs vs Number of genes detected per cell in log2 scale, coloured by each sub-library. Red lines in each graph represents the cutoff (% of mitochondrial genes <0.5, 2,500 < UMI counts/cells > 40,000, 1,000 < Number of genes/cells > 8,000). Figure D shows cutoff for both A and B.
Supplementary Figure S2.
Identifying cell types. (a) Cell clusters identified by Seurat’s FindCluster function using resolution 0.6. (b) Dotplot showing the expression of cell type specific gene in identified clusters. (c) UMAP of cell type marker genes (d) UMAP of identified cell types in the scRNA seq data.
Supplementary Figure S3.
Detection of suspected background contamination and Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. (a) Correlation plot showing % of misassigned UMIs VS total gene counts for each gene in the dataset, (b) Case examples showing the expression level of misassigned genes. (c-e) UMAPs showing the sum of SARS-CoV-2 transcripts, clusters identified and viral treatment groups respectively. Combination of (c-e) was used to identify infected cells shown in (f). (f)-right shows the proportion of infected cells identified in each viral treatment group.
Supplementary Figure S4.
IL-13 decreases abundance of ACE2-expressing ciliated cells. Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy for ACE2 (red, bottom panel), acetylated alpha tubulin (ciliated cells, white), MUC5AC (goblet cells, green) and DAPI (nuclei, blue).
Supplementary Figure S5.
Expression of viral genes in infected cells. Violin plot of SARS-CoV-2 transcripts in Vehicle vs IL-13 (55 days) treated HAE at 72 hpi with SARS-CoV-2. Each dot represents a SARS-CoV-2 transcript-positive cell. The bar at the bottom shows the proportion of cells with zero expression in each group.
Supplementary Figure S6.
Effect of IL-13 treatment on the response of infected ciliated cells. Volcano plots showing DEGs induced by SARS-CoV-2 72 hpi in infected ciliated cells from (a) Vehicle and (b) IL-13 (20ng/mL, 4 days) treated HAE. (c) shows the interaction between (a) and (b). Threshold used for calling significant genes (labelled by red dots): abs (log2fold change)>1, adj p-value ≤ 0.05.
Supplementary Figure S7.
Tropism of SARS2-N501YMA30 and B.1.351. Microscopy images of lung tissue sections from mice two days after infection (2 dpi) with 1000 PFU SARS2-N501YMA30 (“MA30”) or 4x105 PFU of the B.1.351 strain of SARS-CoV-2 after treatment with vehicle vs. IL-13. (a) Immunohistochemistry for viral N protein, (b) immunofluorescence confocal microscopy for detection and co-localisation of N protein and acetylated-α-tubulin (ciliated cells). Arrows point to examples of N protein-positive ciliated cells.
Supplementary Figure S8.
Pathway analysis of infected mice pre-treated with Vehicle or IL-13 (2.5 μg/day intranasal IL-13) for 4 days. (a) Volcano plot showing DEGs between Vehicle and IL-13 groups. Threshold for significant genes (red): abs (log2foldchange) > 1, adj p-value < 0.05 is shown by dotted line. (b) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) table from pathway analysis showing normalised enrichment score and adjusted p-value. Pathway analysis was done using GO: Biological process database.
Supplementary Figure S9.
IL-13 increases SARS-CoV-2 -induced oedema and hyaline membranes. Veh or IL-13 treated samples (left and right columns respectively) at 5 d.p.i. of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Veh treated group samples were distinguishable by regions of consolidation (arrows, and inset, left column) composed of atelectasis, increased cellularity by leukocytes, cellular, debris and localised oedema (∗). In contrast, IL-13 treated samples lacked regions of consolidation and had more evidence of oedema (∗) and hyaline membranes (arrowheads and inset, right column). HE stains, bar = 392 and 78 μm, top and bottom rows respectively).
Supplementary Figure S10.
IL-13 increases SARS-CoV-2- induced peri-vascular M2 macrophages. Vehicle or IL-13 treated sample with (a) mock or (b) 5 dpi SARS-CoV-2 infection. IL-13 treated samples had more AIF1/IBA1 brown staining (arrows) compared to vehicle on low mag of lung and surrounding pulmonary veins. Top bar = 425 μm and bottom bar =85 μm.
References
- 1.Dryden-Peterson S., Kim A., Kim A.Y., et al. Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir for early COVID-19 in a large U.S. health system : a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(1):77–84. doi: 10.7326/M22-2141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Matthay M.A., Luetkemeyer A.F. IL-6 receptor antagonist therapy for patients hospitalized for COVID-19: who, when, and how? JAMA. 2021;326(6):483–485. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Varela F., Symowski C., Pollock J., Wirtz S., Voehringer D. IL-4/IL-13-producing ILC2s are required for timely control of intestinal helminth infection in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2022;52(12):1925–1933. doi: 10.1002/eji.202249892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zaid Y., Dore E., Dubuc I., et al. Chemokines and eicosanoids fuel the hyperinflammation within the lungs of patients with severe COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(2):368–380.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Donlan A.N., Sutherland T.E., Marie C., et al. IL-13 is a driver of COVID-19 severity. JCI Insight. 2021;6(15) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.150107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Donlan A.N., Mallawaarachchi I., Sasson J.M., Preissner R., Loomba J.J., Petri W.A. Dupilumab use is associated with protection from coronavirus disease 2019 mortality: a retrospective analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(1):148–151. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hendrick J., Ma J.Z., Haughey H.M., et al. Pulmonary function and survival 1 year after dupilumab treatment of acute moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019: a Follow-up study from a phase 2a trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(2) doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weiskopf D., Schmitz K.S., Raadsen M.P., et al. Phenotype and kinetics of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(48) doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gil-Etayo F.J., Garcinuno S., Utrero-Rico A., et al. An early Th1 response is a key factor for a favorable COVID-19 evolution. Biomedicines. 2022;10(2):296. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fiorentino D.F., Zlotnik A., Vieira P., et al. IL-10 acts on the antigen-presenting cell to inhibit cytokine production by Th1 cells. J Immunol. 1991;146(10):3444–3451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fiorentino D.F., Zlotnik A., Mosmann T.R., Howard M., O'Garra A. IL-10 inhibits cytokine production by activated macrophages. J Immunol. 1991;147(11):3815–3822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guenova E., Watanabe R., Teague J.E., et al. TH2 cytokines from malignant cells suppress TH1 responses and enforce a global TH2 bias in leukemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(14):3755–3763. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morel P.A., Oriss T.B. Crossregulation between Th1 and Th2 cells. Crit Rev Immunol. 1998;18(4):275–303. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v18.i4.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pavel A.B., Glickman J.W., Michels J.R., Kim-Schulze S., Miller R.L., Guttman-Yassky E. Th2/Th1 cytokine imbalance is associated with higher COVID-19 risk mortality. Front Genet. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.706902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bonser L.R., Eckalbar W.L., Rodriguez L., et al. The type 2 asthma mediator IL-13 inhibits severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection of bronchial epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2022;66(4):391–401. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2021-0364OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y., Zhu K., Wang X., Zhao Y., Shi J., Liu Z. Roles of IL-4, IL-13, and their receptors in lung cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2024;44(9):399–407. doi: 10.1089/jir.2024.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mannion J.M., Rahimi R.A. Tissue-resident Th2 cells in type 2 immunity and allergic diseases. Immunol Rev. 2025;330(1) doi: 10.1111/imr.70006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lucas C., Wong P., Klein J., et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2020;584(7821):463–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pezzulo A.A., Tudas R.A., Stewart C.G., et al. HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin reverts IL-13- and IL-17-induced airway goblet cell metaplasia. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(2):744–758. doi: 10.1172/JCI123524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grunig G., Warnock M., Wakil A.E., et al. Requirement for IL-13 independently of IL-4 in experimental asthma. Science. 1998;282(5397):2261–2263. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pope S.M., Brandt E.B., Mishra A., et al. IL-13 induces eosinophil recruitment into the lung by an IL-5- and eotaxin-dependent mechanism. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(4):594–601. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mishra A., Hogan S.P., Brandt E.B., Rothenberg M.E. An etiological role for aeroallergens and eosinophils in experimental esophagitis. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(1):83–90. doi: 10.1172/JCI10224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wan H., Kaestner K.H., Ang S.L., et al. Foxa2 regulates alveolarization and goblet cell hyperplasia. Development. 2004;131(4):953–964. doi: 10.1242/dev.00966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang M., Hogan S.P., Henry P.J., et al. Interleukin-13 mediates airways hyperreactivity through the IL-4 receptor-alpha chain and STAT-6 independently of IL-5 and eotaxin. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001;25(4):522–530. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.25.4.4620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Group WHOREAfC-TW, Sterne J.A.C., Murthy S., et al. Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1330–1341. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Group R.C., Horby P., Lim W.S., et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang M., Cao R., Zhang L., et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020;30(3):269–271. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kalil A.C., Patterson T.F., Mehta A.K., et al. Baricitinib plus remdesivir for hospitalized adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(9):79–807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Runnstrom M.C., Lamothe P.A., Faliti C.E., et al. Patients taking benralizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab have lower postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024;154(2):435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karp P.H., Moninger T.O., Weber S.P., et al. An in vitro model of differentiated human airway epithelia. Methods for establishing primary cultures. Methods Mol Biol. 2002;188:115–137. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-185-X:115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wong L.R., Zheng J., Wilhelmsen K., et al. Eicosanoid signalling blockade protects middle-aged mice from severe COVID-19. Nature. 2022;605(7908):146–151. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04630-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Berkebile A.R., Bartlett J.A., Abou Alaiwa M., Varga S.M., Power U.F., McCray P.B., Jr. Airway surface liquid has innate antiviral activity that is reduced in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2020;62(1):104–111. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0304OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Touzelet O., Loukili N., Pelet T., Fairley D., Curran J., Power U.F. De novo generation of a non-segmented negative strand RNA virus with a bicistronic gene. Virus Res. 2009;140(1–2):40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Villenave R., Touzelet O., Thavagnanam S., et al. Cytopathogenesis of sendai virus in well-differentiated primary pediatric bronchial epithelial cells. J Virol. 2010;84(22):11718–11728. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00798-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Case J.B., Rothlauf P.W., Chen R.E., et al. Replication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus vaccine vector protects against SARS-CoV-2-Mediated pathogenesis in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(3):465–474.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meyerholz D.K., Beck A.P., Goeken J.A., et al. Glycogen depletion can increase the specificity of mucin detection in airway tissues. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3855-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Meyerholz D.K., Beck A.P. Principles and approaches for reproducible scoring of tissue stains in research. Lab Invest. 2018;98(7):844–855. doi: 10.1038/s41374-018-0057-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rosenberg A.B., Roco C.M., Muscat R.A., et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science. 2018;360(6385):176–182. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B.M., Walker S.C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme 4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1995;57(1):289–300. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bray N.L., Pimentel H., Melsted P., Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(5):525–527. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Soneson C., Love M.I., Robinson M.D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 2015;4:1521. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7563.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ge S.X., Son E.W., Yao R. iDEP: an integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2486-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liberzon A., Birger C., Thorvaldsdottir H., Ghandi M., Mesirov J.P., Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1(6):417–425. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kramer A., Green J., Pollard J., Jr., Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(4):523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vijay R., Hua X., Meyerholz D.K., et al. Critical role of phospholipase A2 group IID in age-related susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV infection. J Exp Med. 2015;212(11):1851–1868. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kimura H., Francisco D., Conway M., et al. Type 2 inflammation modulates ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in airway epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146(1):80–88.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Keewan E., Beg S., Naser S.A. Anti-TNF-alpha agents modulate SARS-CoV-2 receptors and increase the risk of infection through Notch-1 signaling. Front Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.641295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Peng G., Okumura K., Ogawa H., Ikeda S., Niyonsaba F. Psoriatic lesional expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 is reduced by blockade of IL-17 signaling but not by other biologic treatments. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(3):714–715. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.01.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Thavagnanam S., Parker J.C., McBrien M.E., Skibinski G., Heaney L.G., Shields M.D. Effects of IL-13 on mucociliary differentiation of pediatric asthmatic bronchial epithelial cells. Pediatr Res. 2011;69(2):95–100. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318204edb5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zuyderduyn S., Ninaber D.K., Schrumpf J.A., et al. IL-4 and IL-13 exposure during mucociliary differentiation of bronchial epithelial cells increases antimicrobial activity and expression of antimicrobial peptides. Respir Res. 2011;12(1):59. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhen G., Park S.W., Nguyenvu L.T., et al. IL-13 and epidermal growth factor receptor have critical but distinct roles in epithelial cell mucin production. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36(2):244–253. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0180OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rehman T., Thornell I.M., Pezzulo A.A., et al. TNFalpha and IL-17 alkalinize airway surface liquid through CFTR and pendrin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;319(2):C331–C344. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00112.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sajuthi S.P., DeFord P., Li Y., et al. Type 2 and interferon inflammation regulate SARS-CoV-2 entry factor expression in the airway epithelium. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5139. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18781-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rehman T., Welsh M.J. Inflammation as a regulator of the airway surface liquid pH in cystic fibrosis. Cells. 2023;12(8):1104. doi: 10.3390/cells12081104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Simonin J., Bille E., Crambert G., et al. Airway surface liquid acidification initiates host defense abnormalities in cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42751-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yang E., Li M.M.H. All about the RNA: interferon-stimulated genes that interfere with viral RNA processes. Front Immunol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.605024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wu C.T., Lidsky P.V., Xiao Y., et al. SARS-CoV-2 replication in airway epithelia requires motile cilia and microvillar reprogramming. Cell. 2023;186(1):112–130.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Miao Y., He L., Qi X., Lin X. Injecting immunosuppressive M2 macrophages alleviates the symptoms of periodontitis in mice. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.603817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tang Y., Wu P., Li L., Xu W., Jiang J. Mesenchymal stem cells and their small extracellular vesicles as crucial immunological efficacy for hepatic diseases. Front Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.880523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Stephen-Victor E., Das M., Karnam A., Pitard B., Gautier J.F., Bayry J. Potential of regulatory T-cell-based therapies in the management of severe COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(3) doi: 10.1183/13993003.02182-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lee K.M.C., Achuthan A.A., Hamilton J.A. GM-CSF: a promising target in inflammation and autoimmunity. Immunotargets Ther. 2020;9:225–240. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S262566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lawrence T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1(6) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nataraj C., Thomas D.W., Tilley S.L., et al. Receptors for prostaglandin E(2) that regulate cellular immune responses in the mouse. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(8):1229–1235. doi: 10.1172/JCI13640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jiang J., Dingledine R. Prostaglandin receptor EP2 in the crosshairs of anti-inflammation, anti-cancer, and neuroprotection. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(7):413–423. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Werder R.B., Lynch J.P., Simpson J.C., et al. PGD2/DP2 receptor activation promotes severe viral bronchiolitis by suppressing IFN-Lambda production. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(440) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ng K., Raheem J., St Laurent C.D., et al. Responses of human mast cells and epithelial cells following exposure to influenza A virus. Antiviral Res. 2019;171 doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mizumura K., Hashimoto S., Maruoka S., et al. Role of mitogen-activated protein kinases in influenza virus induction of prostaglandin E2 from arachidonic acid in bronchial epithelial cells. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33(9):1244–1251. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01750.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ricke-Hoch M., Stelling E., Lasswitz L., et al. Impaired immune response mediated by prostaglandin E2 promotes severe COVID-19 disease. PLoS One. 2021;16(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Irun P., Gracia R., Piazuelo E., et al. Serum lipid mediator profiles in COVID-19 patients and lung disease severity: a pilot study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33682-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Archambault A.S., Zaid Y., Rakotoarivelo V., et al. High levels of eicosanoids and docosanoids in the lungs of intubated COVID-19 patients. FASEB J. 2021;35(6) doi: 10.1096/fj.202100540R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Khanapure S.P., Garvey D.S., Janero D.R., Letts L.G. Eicosanoids in inflammation: biosynthesis, pharmacology, and therapeutic frontiers. Curr Top Med Chem. 2007;7(3):311–340. doi: 10.2174/156802607779941314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Morrison C.B., Edwards C.E., Shaffer K.M., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of airway cells causes intense viral and cell shedding, two spreading mechanisms affected by IL-13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(16) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2119680119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li K., Bartlett J.A., Wohlford-Lenane C.L., et al. Interleukin 13-induced inflammation increases DPP4 abundance but does not enhance Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication in airway epithelia. J Infect Dis. 2024;229(5):1419–1429. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Otter C.J., Fausto A., Tan L.H., Khosla A.S., Cohen N.A., Weiss S.R. Infection of primary nasal epithelial cells differentiates among lethal and seasonal human coronaviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(15) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2218083120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saheb Sharif-Askari F., Goel S., Saheb Sharif-Askari N., et al. Asthma associated cytokines regulate the expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the lung tissue of asthmatic patients. Front Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.796094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Doni Jayavelu N., Altman M.C., Benson B., et al. Type 2 inflammation reduces SARS-CoV-2 replication in the airway epithelium in allergic asthma through functional alteration of ciliated epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;152(1):56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hou Y.J., Okuda K., Edwards C.E., et al. SARS-CoV-2 reverse genetics reveals a variable infection gradient in the respiratory tract. Cell. 2020;182(2):429–446.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.McCray P.B., Jr., Pewe L., Wohlford-Lenane C., et al. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2007;81(2):813–821. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02012-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Boyce J.A. Mast cells and eicosanoid mediators: a system of reciprocal paracrine and autocrine regulation. Immunol Rev. 2007;217:168–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zheng J., Meyerholz D., Wong L.R., Gelb M., Murakami M., Perlman S. Coronavirus-specific antibody production in middle-aged mice requires phospholipase A2G2D. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(11) doi: 10.1172/JCI147201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ouhaddi Y., Nebbaki S.S., Habouri L., et al. Exacerbation of aging-associated and instability-induced murine osteoarthritis with deletion of D prostanoid receptor 1, a prostaglandin D(2) receptor. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(9):1784–1795. doi: 10.1002/art.40160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zheng J., Sariol A., Meyerholz D., et al. Prostaglandin D2 signaling in dendritic cells is critical for the development of EAE. J Autoimmun. 2020;114 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Verma A.K., Zheng J., Mack M., Ginhoux F., Perlman S. Differential effects of prostaglandin D(2) signaling on macrophages and microglia in murine coronavirus encephalomyelitis. mBio. 2021;12(5) doi: 10.1128/mBio.01969-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Fahy J.V. Type 2 inflammation in asthma--present in most, absent in many. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(1):57–65. doi: 10.1038/nri3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mills C.D., Kincaid K., Alt J.M., Heilman M.J., Hill A.M. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol. 2000;164(12):6166–6173. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fornefett J., Krause J., Klose K., et al. Comparative analysis of humoral immune responses and pathologies of BALB/c and C57BL/6 wildtype mice experimentally infected with a highly virulent Rodentibacter pneumotropicus (pasteurella pneumotropica) strain. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1186-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Barnes H.W., Demirdjian S., Haddock N.L., et al. Hyaluronan in the pathogenesis of acute and post-acute COVID-19 infection. Matrix Biol. 2023;116:49–66. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2023.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Rogero M.M., Leao M.C., Santana T.M., et al. Potential benefits and risks of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation to patients with COVID-19. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;156:190–199. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.White C., Wright A., Brightling C. Fevipiprant in the treatment of asthma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(2):199–207. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1432592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Human scRNA-seq and mouse bulk RNA-seq data has been deposited in the NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Superseries GSE249308).
















