Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1987 Jun 20;294(6587):1579–1582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6587.1579

Is screening for bacteriuria in pregnancy worth while?

M Campbell-Brown, I R McFadyen, D V Seal, M L Stephenson
PMCID: PMC1246728  PMID: 3113538

Abstract

A total of 4470 pregnant women were screened for bacteriuria by the dipslide method and significant growth found in 226 (5.1%). In 198 cases the urine was re-examined, in 119 by using suprapubic aspiration or catheterisation (62 (52%) samples contained bacteria) and in 79 by using midstream urine samples (26 (33%) samples contained greater than 10(8) colony forming units/1), showing the maximum prevalence of confirmed bacteriuria to be 2.6%. Overt urinary tract infection developed later in four of 80 patients with proved bacteriuria who had been given antibiotics, in one of eight untreated patients with bacteriuria, in one of 110 patients with unconfirmed bacteriuria, and in one of 226 non-bacteriuric controls. A history of urinary tract infection was given by 18% of controls and 42% of women with confirmed bacteriuria. Screening for bacteriuria and treatment with antibiotics to prevent later overt infection is expensive. Whether it is worth while and cost effective depends largely on the prevalence of bacteriuria in the local population and the proportion who develop overt infection. The screening and treatment programme reported here appeared to prevent only six cases of overt infection.

Full text

PDF
1579

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chng P. K., Hall M. H. Antenatal prediction of urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Jan;89(1):8–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilstrap L. C., 3rd, Cunningham F. G., Whalley P. J. Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: an anterospective study. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Apr;57(4):409–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HENDERSON M., ENTWISLE G., TAYBACK M. Bacteriuria and pregnancy outcome: preliminary findings. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962 Nov;52:1887–1893. doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.11.1887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KASS E. H. Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957 Nov;100(5):709–714. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1957.00260110025004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lenke R. R., VanDorsten J. P., Schifrin B. S. Pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a prospective randomized trial to prevent recurrent disease evaluating suppressive therapy with nitrofurantoin and close surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Aug 15;146(8):953–957. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90972-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MOND N. C., PERCIVAL A., WILLIAMS J. D., BRUMFITT W. PRESENTATION, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS IN GENERAL PRACTICE. Lancet. 1965 Mar 6;1(7384):514–516. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)92020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MacFarlane T. W. A semiselective medium for the isolation of Veillonella species from the mouth. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Feb;30(2):191–192. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.2.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mattingly R. F., Borkowf H. I. Clinical implications of ureteral reflux in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Sep;21(3):863–873. doi: 10.1097/00003081-197809000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McFadyen I. R., Eykyn S. J., Gardner N. H., Vanier T. M., Bennett A. E., Mayo M. E., Lloyd-Davies R. W. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973 May;80(5):385–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1973.tb15952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McGrady G. A., Daling J. R., Peterson D. R. Maternal urinary tract infection and adverse fetal outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;121(3):377–381. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ROGOSA M., MITCHELL J. A., WISEMAN R. F. A selective medium for the isolation and enumeration of oral and fecal lactobacilli. J Bacteriol. 1951 Jul;62(1):132–133. doi: 10.1128/jb.62.1.132-133.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Savage W. E., Hajj S. N., Kass E. H. Demographic and prognostic characteristics of bacteriuria in pregnancy. Medicine (Baltimore) 1967 Sep;46(5):385–407. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196709000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stamm W. E., Wagner K. F., Amsel R., Alexander E. R., Turck M., Counts G. W., Holmes K. K. Causes of the acute urethral syndrome in women. N Engl J Med. 1980 Aug 21;303(8):409–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198008213030801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TURCK M., GOFFE B. S., PETERSDORF R. G. Bacteriuria of pregnancy. Relation to socioeconomic factors. N Engl J Med. 1962 Apr 26;266:857–860. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196204262661703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES