Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Sep 26;20(9):e0333387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333387

Tunable single- and dual-wavelength lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LuGdAG crystal

Haotian Huang 1, Yuzhao Li 1, Nguyen Tuan Anh 1, Yanfei Lü 1, Jing Xia 1,*
Editor: Rajesh Sharma2
PMCID: PMC12469163  PMID: 41004442

Abstract

We present the first diode-pumped tunable single- and dual-wavelength (DW) laser operation near 1.4 μm spectral region in Nd:LuGdAG (Nd:LGAG) crystal on the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition. Three distinct lasing wavelengths at 1414 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm were generated by adjusting a Lyot filter (LF) in the cavity, respectively. The maximum continuous-wave (CW) power output of 3.64 W at 1414 nm was attained under an absorbed pump power of 18.7 W, exhibiting a slope efficiency of 23.7% and optical conversion efficiency of 19.5%. Further, three pairs of DW lasers operating at 1414 nm and 1426 nm, 1414 nm and 1437 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm were also achieved, respectively. The DW operation at 1414 nm and 1437 nm yielded 2.82 W total CW output power, attaining 15.1% total optical conversion efficiency. Single- and DW lasers in the 1410–1440 nm spectral range have important application in fields such as optical communication and medicine.

1. Introduction

Nd-doped solid-state lasers predominantly employ three principal emission bands in the near-infrared spectrum: 0.9 μm corresponding to the three-level 4F3/2 → 4I9/2 transition, and four-level configurations at 1.1 μm (4F3/2 → 4I11/2) and 1.3/1.4 μm (4F3/2 → 4I13/2). Multiple Nd3+-doped crystals including Nd:YVO4 [1,2], Nd:YAG [35], Nd:GdVO4 [6,7], Nd:YLF [8,9], Nd:YAP [10,11], Nd:CALGO [12] and Nd:GSAG [1315] have demonstrated solid-state laser functionality. Conventionally, the 1.3 μm emission band in Nd-doped crystals originates from the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition. However, this splitting phenomenon arises from the crystal field splitting effect, which partitions the energy levels into multiple Stark sublevels. Exemplified by Nd:YAG, such crystal fields induce over a dozen distinct emission peaks within the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 manifold, with corresponding 1.4 μm region emissions having been documented in multiple studies [1619]. Laser sources operating near 1.4 μm exhibit inherent eye-safe characteristics, enabling their deployment in diverse technical domains including optical communications, coherent LIDAR systems, dermatological treatments, advanced laser medicine, and ophthalmic therapies [2025]. Among neodymium-doped laser crystals, Nd:LGYAG has been widely adopted in solid-state lasers due to its excellent optical quality and weak thermal lensing effect [26,27]. In the case of Nd:LGAG, Lu3+ and Gd3+ ions substitute for the totality of the Y3+ ions of the Nd:YAG but with a proportion Lu3+and Gd3+ of about 30%. While The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 [28], 0.9 [29] and 1.3 μm [30] have been implemented successfully in prior studies, systematic research on CW laser generation at 1.4 μm in the Nd:LGAG has not been reported until now. Fig 1 demonstrates the emission cross-section of the Nd:LGAG from 1250 nm to 1500 nm at room temperature on the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition, which was calculated via the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg (F-L) formula [31]. It can be shown in Fig 1 that the strongest peak was 1332 nm. In addition, there were five peaks at 1316 nm, 1348 nm, 1414 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm.

Fig 1. Emission spectrum of the Nd:LGAG in 1250 −1500 nm.

Fig 1

In this study, we achieved three-wavelength tunability at 1414, 1426 and 1437 nm in Nd:LGAG on the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition. Additionally, three pairs of DW tunability at 1414 nm and 1426 nm, 1414 nm and 1437 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm were also realized. Extensive implementation potential of DW laser systems has been identified across diverse technical domains including LIDAR systems [32], medical diagnostics [33], optical holography [34,35], precision spectral analysis [36], metrological sensing [37,38], nonlinear frequency conversion for UV/visible generation [39,40], and THz wave synthesis via difference frequency generation [4143]. Especially, DW lasers around 1.4 μm enable simultaneous superficial epidermal heating and deep dermal collagen stimulation for non-invasive skin tightening and vascular coagulation, leveraging minimal thermal damage to surrounding tissues [44].

2. Experimental setup

The schematic diagram for the laser experiment was displayed in Fig 2. The pump system employs a 20 W 808 nm laser diode (LD) with a NA of 0.22 and a fiber core diameter of 400μm. The radius of the pump spot was about 200 μm in the active medium. The laser spot radius in the active medium was about 190 μm. Two identical coupling lenses (L1 and L2) with a focal length of 100 mm were utilized, featuring anti-reflection (AR) at 808 nm on both surfaces. The measured transmittance of the optical coupling system exceeded 98%. A Nd:LGAG (1.0 at.% doping, 6 mm length) functioned as the active medium with AR at 808 nm and 1410-1440 nm, which was sealed in indium foil and affixed to red copper mounts equipped with water cooling, maintained at 15°C.

Fig 2. Schematic setup for the laser experiment.

Fig 2

Inset: LF.

The cavity input coupler was a planar mirror (M1) with AR for 808 nm and 1060–1350 nm, and high reflectivity (HR) at 1410–1440 nm. The cavity output coupler was a concave mirror (M2) with a radius of curvature of –200 mm, a transmittance (Toc) of 3.5% at 1410–1440 nm, and AR at 1060–1350 nm. Two other couplers (Toc = 2.0% and 5.0%) were also carried out, with the M2 demonstrated the optimal output performance. A quartz-based LF (4.0 mm thickness) was employed for wavelength tuning, positioned within the resonator at θB (Brewster angle) as depicted in Fig 2 inset. The tuning angle (α) was an angle between the optical axis of the LF (C) and the incident light projection on the LF surface.

3. Results and discussion

The single-pass transmittance for different wavelengths transmitted through the LF was expressed as [45]

TLyot,i=14cos2αsin2θB14cos2αcos2θB(1cos2αsin2θB1cos2αcos2θB)sin2(δi2), (1)

where i= 1, 2 and 3 represents the 1414 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm three wavelengths, respectively, δi = 2πd(none)(1–cos2αcos2θB)/λisinθB is an optical phase difference, no and ne are the refractive indices of o- and e-light, respectively, d is a thickness of the filter. With Eq. (1) and the parameters: no = 1.5443, ne = 1.5534, d = 4 mm and θB = 57.2o, the round-trip transmittance(TLyot,i2) of the different laser wavelength (λi) was calculated as a function of the tuning angle as displayed in Fig 3. It can be shown from Fig 3 that TLyot,i2 can be controlled by regulating the LF surface around its normal axis. Thus, tuning between emission wavelengths can be realized by controlling the LF.

Fig 3. Round-trip transmittance (T2 Lyot,i) versus the tuning angle (α).

Fig 3

When tuning angle was rotated to about 38o, 39o, and 40o, the corresponding emissions at 1414 nm, 1426 nm, and 1437 nm were achieved, and their output-input performances were displayed in Fig 4. At an absorbed pump power of 18.7 W (corresponding to an incident power of 20 W) with Toc = 3.5%, the laser demonstrated output powers of 3.64 W at 1414 nm, 3.01 W at 1426 nm, and 2.21 W at 1437 nm. The corresponding lasing thresholds were 2.70 W, 3.01 W and 3.21 W, with slope efficiencies of 23.7%, 19.4% and 14.5%, respectively. At Toc = 2.0%, the laser demonstrated slope efficiencies of 18.3%, 15.2%, and 10.3% at 1414 nm, 1426 nm, and 1437 nm respectively, with corresponding threshold powers of 1.72 W, 2.12 W and 2.65 W. When Toc was increased to 5.0%, the slope efficiencies changed to 17.4%, 14.6%, and 8.5%, while the threshold powers increased to 4.5 W, 5.7 W and 6.3 W for the respective wavelengths. The laser spectra at 1414 nm, 1426 nm, and 1437 nm at the maximum pumping were displayed in the Fig 5. The corresponding wavelength peaks (1415.85 nm, 1426.28 nm and 1436.94 nm) exhibited spectral line width (FWHM) values of 0.30 nm, 0.33 nm and 0.35 nm, respectively.

Fig 4. Output powers of the three single-wavelengths versus absorbed pump power.

Fig 4

Fig 5. Laser spectra of the three single-wavelengths.

Fig 5

The power stabilities of the three laser wavelengths were measured with a precision power meter. The power fluctuations (RMS) at the maximum output powers were about 2.7%, 3.6% and 3.9% in 1 hour, respectively, as shown in Fig 6. The insets (a)-(c) of Fig 6 show the measured radii and the beam quality factors (M2) of the 1414 nm, 1426 nm, and 1437 nm beams, respectively. The beam quality factors (M²) of the 1414 nm, 1426 nm, and 1437 nm wavelengths were measured using the knife-edge technique. The corresponding values in both transverse directions at maximum output power were less than 1.16, 1.12 and 1.25, respectively.

Fig 6. Power stabilities of the three laser wavelengths.

Fig 6

Insets (a), (b) and (c) show the X- and Y-axes radii as functions of Z-axis position for the 1414 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm beams, respectively.

For a four-level laser system operating with CW, the oscillation threshold of each emission wavelength in a DW operation was given by [46]

Ptha,i=ln(1Toc)+Li+L0i2lcηq,ihνpσiτi1rp(r,z)si(r,z)dυ, (2)

where Toc is the cavity transmittance for the laser emission wavelengths, Li=1TLyot,i2 is the round-trip loss, which is caused by the LF, L0i is the cavity round trip passive loss, lc is the length of the Nd:LGAG, ηq,i is the quantum efficiency, hνp is the photon energy of the pump beam, σi is the stimulated emission cross-section, τi is the upper energy level lifetime, rp(r,z) is the pump beam distribution of the normalized intensity in the Nd:LGAG, and si(r,z) is the cavity mode distribution of the normalized intensity for the emission wavelength. rp(r,z) and si(r,z) can be written by [47], respectively,

rp(r,z)=αeαzπωp2(z)(1eαz)Θ(ωp2(z)r2), (3)

and

si(r,z)=2πωi02lcexp(2r2ωi02), (4)

where α is the absorption coefficient, Θis the Heaviside step function, ω0i is the radius of the laser spot, and the size of the pump beam in the Nd:LGAG given by

ωp2(z)=ωp02{1+[λpMp2nπωp02(zz0)]2}, (5)

where ωp0 is the radius of the pump spot, λp is the pump wavelength, M2 pis the quality factor of the pump beam. With Eqs. (1)-(5) and the parameters in our experiment: Toc = 3.5%, σ1 = 1.04 × 10−20 cm2, σ2 = 0.84 × 10−20 cm2, σ3 = 0.98 × 10−20 cm2, α = 3.5 cm-1, lc = 5 mm, ωp = 200 μm, ω0i = 190 μm, n = 1.83, M2 = 3.5,ηq,i ≈ 0.57, τi ≈ 262μs, hνp = 2.45 × 10−19J, and L0i=0.5% was measured using the Findlay-Clay method [48], the threshold was calculated as a function of tuning angle α for the three laser wavelengths, as displayed in Fig 7. It can be seen that the threshold can be controlled by regulating the LF. It can be observed that intersecting points exist between any two threshold power curves, indicating that the pump power required for lasing threshold is identical for both wavelengths at these intersection points. Consequently, DW lasers could be achieved when the pump powers were precisely regulated to these power levels.

Fig 7. Tuning angle versus the threshold power.

Fig 7

When α was regulated to about 3.5o, 5.5o, and 16.5o, the three pairs of the DWs at 1414 nm and 1426 nm, 1414 nm and 1437 nm, and 1426 nm and 1437 nm were generated, respectively, and their output-input performances were displayed in Fig 8. At an absorbed power of 18.7 W, the total powers were 2.82 W (1.44 W at 1437 nm and 1.38 W at 1414 nm), 2.75 W (1.50 W at 1426 nm and 1.25 W at 1414 nm) and 2.12 W (1.06 W at 1426 nm and 0.96 W at 1437 nm) for the three pairs of DWs, respectively. The corresponding threshold powers were 3.58 W, 4.21 W and 4.72 W, respectively. The total optical conversion efficiencies with respect to the absorbed power were 15.1%, 14.7% and 11.3%, respectively. The laser spectra of the three pairs of DWs were displayed in the Fig 9. The corresponding peak wavelengths were 1413.83 nm and 1426.41 nm, 1413.95 nm and 1437.04 nm, 1426.44 nm and 1437.02 nm, respectively. For the three pairs of DWs, Their corresponding M2 factors were 1.12 and 1.15, 1.18 and 1.24 and 1.22 and 1.27, respectively, and their power stabilities were about 2.5% and 2.9%, 2.8% and 3.8%, and 3.5% and 4.2%, respectively.

Fig 8. Output powers of DWs versus absorbed pump power.

Fig 8

Fig 9. Laser spectra of the three pairs of DWs.

Fig 9

Compared with the previously reported the 1.4 μm single-wavelength laser on Nd:GSAG crystal (slope efficiency of 13.6%, optical conversion efficiency of 11.5% [15]), the single-wavelength system in this study achieved a slope efficiency of 23.7% and an optical conversion efficiency of 19.5%. In terms of DW laser output, the total optical conversion efficiency has increased from 9.2% to 15.1%. These data fully demonstrate the significant progress of this laser system in the optical conversion efficiency at the 1.4 μm spectral region.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, diode-pumped tunable single- and DW laser operation near 1.4 μm spectral region in Nd:LGAG on the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition was demonstrated for the first time. By regulated an intracavity LF, the three single-wavelengths at 1414 nm, 1426 nm and 1437 nm were obtained, respectively. The maximum CWoutput power of 3.64 W at 1414 nm was attained under an absorbed pump power of 18.7 W, exhibiting a slope efficiency of 23.7% and optical conversion efficiency of 19.5%. Further, three pairs of DW lasers operating at 1414 nm and 1426 nm, 1414 nm and 1437 nm, and 1426 nm and 1437 nm were also achieved, respectively. The DW operation at 1414 nm and 1437 nm yielded 2.82 W total CW output power, attaining 15.1% total optical conversion efficiency. This study proposes a new method for generating tunable single- and DW lasers, which can be applied to other active medium to achieve laser output of different spectral regions.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62175209 and 62241506).

References

  • 1.Yu H, Li Y, Moazzam F, Lin L, Gao B. Orthogonally polarized dual-wavelength Nd:GdVO4/Nd:YVO4 laser at 1341 and 1342 nm with adjustable power ratio. PLoS ONE. 2025;20:e0317875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lü 2, Zhang J, Xia J, Liu H. Diode-Pumped Quasi-Three-Level Nd:YVO4 Laser with Orthogonally Polarized Emission. IEEE Photon Technol Lett. 2014;26:656–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lü Y, Zhao L, Zhai P, Xia J, Fu X, and Li S. Simultaneous three-wavelength continuous-wave laser at 946 nm, 1319 nm and 1064 nm in Nd:YAG. Opt. Commun. 2013; 286: 257–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lü Y, Xia J, Cheng W, Chen J, Ning G, Liang Z. Diode-pumped cw Nd:YAG three-level laser at 869 nm. Opt Lett. 2010;35(21):3670–2. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.003670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Czeranowsky C, Heumann E, Huber G. All-solid-state continuous-wave frequency-doubled Nd:YAG-BiBO laser with 2.8-W output power at 473 nm. Opt Lett. 2003;28(6):432–4. doi: 10.1364/ol.28.000432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu B, Jiang P, Yang D, Chen T, Kong J, Shen Y. Compact dual-wavelength Nd:GdVO4 laser working at 1063 and 1065 nm. Optics Express. 2009;17:6004–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Czeranowsky C, Schmidt M, Heumann E, Huber G, Kutovoi S, Zavartsev Y. Continuous wave diode pumped intracavity doubled Nd:GdVO4 laser with 840 mW output power at 456 nm. Opt Commun. 2002;205:361–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pollak T, Wing W, Grasso R, Chicklis E, Jenssen H. CW Laser Operation of Nd:YLF. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1982;18:159–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu S, Gao S. A new wavelength laser at 1370 nm generated by Nd:YLF crystal. Mater Lett. 2016;183:451–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tzeng YS, Huang YJ, Tang CY, Su KW, Chen WD, Zhang G, et al. High-power tunable single- and multi-wavelength diode-pumped Nd:YAP laser in the (4)F3/2 → (4)I11/2 transition. Opt Express. 2013;21(22):26261–8. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.026261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boucher M, Musset O, Boquillon J, Georgiou E. Multiwatt CW diode end-pumped Nd:YAP laser at 1.08 and 1.34 μm: influence of Nd doping level. Opt Commun. 2002;212:139–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akbari R, Loiko P, Xu J, Xu X, Major A. Dual-wavelength Nd:CALGO laser based on differential loss of birefringent filter. Laser Phys Lett. 2024;21:015001. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kallmeyer F, Dziedzina M, Wang X, Eichler H, Czeranowsky C, Ileri B, et al. Nd:GSAG-pulsed laser operation at 943 nm and crystal growth. Appl Phys B. 2007;89:305–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang X, Kallmeyer F, Chen J, Eichler H. Model of pulsed Nd:GSAG laser at 942 nm considering rate equations with cavity structure. Appl Phys B. 2008;92:43–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chu C, Fu X, Li Y. Diode-pumped continuous-wave Nd:GSAG lasers operating at 1.4 μm. Opt Laser Technol. 2025;181:111846. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee H, Kima Y. Output characteristics of a flashlamp pumped Nd:YAG laser at 1444 nm. Opt Laser Technol. 2008;40:901–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Podlipensky A, Yumashev K, Kuleshov N, Kretschmann H, Huber G. Passive Q-switching of 1.44 lm and 1.34 lm diode-pumped Nd:YAG lasers with a V:YAG saturable absorber. Appl Phys B. 2003;76:245. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Šulc J, Novák J, Jelínková H, Nejezchleb K, Škoda V. 1444-nm Q-switched pulse generator based on Nd:YAG/V:YAG microchip laser. Laser Phys. 2010;20:1288. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hodgson N, Nighan WL Jr, Golding DJ, Eisel D. Efficient 100-W Nd:YAG laser operating at a wavelength of 1.444 microm. Opt Lett. 1994;19(17):1328–30. doi: 10.1364/ol.19.001328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liang W, Zhang X, Xia J, Jin G, Xu L, Sun G, et al. Diode-pumped continuous-wave eye-safe Nd:YAP laser at 1.43 μm. Laser Phys Lett. 2011;8:286. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tark KC, Jung JE, Song SY. Superior lipolytic effect of the 1,444 nm Nd:YAG laser: comparison with the 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(10):721–7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Han S, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Hu D, Xu X, Yu H, et al. Graphene Q-switched 1.4 μm solid state laser. Laser Phys Lett. 2018;15:075801. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Comparison of a 1450-nm diode laser and a 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of atrophic facial scars: a prospective clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(2 Pt 1):152–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30078.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Perez-Maldonado A, Rünger TM, Krejci-Papa N. The 1,450-nm diode laser reduces sebum production in facial skin: a possible mode of action of its effectiveness for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(2):189–92. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sabella A, Piper JA, Mildren RP. Efficient conversion of a 1.064 μm Nd:YAG laser to the eye-safe region using a diamond Raman laser. Opt Express. 2011;19(23):23554–60. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.023554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kubo T, Kane T. Diode-pumped lasers at five eye-safe wavelengths. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1992;28:1033–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mackenzie J, Szela J, Beecher S, Parsonage T, Eason R, Shepherd D. Crystal planar waveguides, a power scaling architecture for low-gain transitions. IEEE J Sel Topics Quantum Electron. 2015;21:380–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Di J, Xu X, Xia C, Tan W, Zhang J, Tang D, et al. Highly efficient passive mode locking of Nd:Lu2.9Gd0.1Al5O12 garnet crystal. Laser Phys. 2013;23:055803. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhuang S, Han S, Wang Z, Hu D, Xu X, Yu H. Efficient quasi-three-level laser operation of Nd:Gd:LuAG crystal and blue light generation. IEEE Photon Technol Lett. 2013;25:355–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Di J, Xu X, Cheng S, Li D, Zhou D, Wu F, et al. Crystal growth, spectroscopic and CW laser properties of Nd0.03Lu2.871Gd0.099Al5O12 crystal. Laser Phys. 2011;21:1891–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huber G, Krühler W, Bludau W, Danielmeyer H. Anisotropy in the laser performance of NdP5O14. J Appl Phys. 1975;46:3580–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Farley RW, Dao PD. Development of an intracavity-summed multiple-wavelength Nd:YAG laser for a rugged, solid-state sodium lidar system. Appl Opt. 1995;34(21):4269–73. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.004269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Son SN, Song J-J, Kang JU, Kim C-S. Simultaneous second harmonic generation of multiple wavelength laser outputs for medical sensing. Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(6):6125–30. doi: 10.3390/s110606125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weigl F. Two-wavelength holographic interferometry for transparent media using a diffraction grating. Appl Opt. 1971;10(5):1083–6. doi: 10.1364/AO.10.001083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fu Q, Dong C, Wang K, He Q, Gu X, Liu J, et al. Underwater target laser polarization suppression scattering detection technology and verification. PLoS One. 2024;19(6):e0305929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Basov N, Gubin M, Nikitin V, Nikuchin A, Petrovskii V, Protsenko E, et al. Highly-sensitive method of narrow spectral-line separations, based on the detection of frequency resonances of a 2-mode gas-laser with non-linear absorption. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR, Ser Fiz. 1982;46:1573–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang S, Tan Y, Li Y. Orthogonally polarized dual frequency lasers and applications in self-sensing metrology. Meas Sci Technol. 2010;21:054016. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fei L, Zhang S. The discovery of nanometer fringes in laser self-mixing interference. Optics Communications. 2007;273:226–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Daykin J, Woods JRC, Bek R, Jetter M, Michler P, Mills B, et al. Bi-frequency operation in a membrane external-cavity surface-emitting laser. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0289223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen Y, Tsai S. Diode-pumped Q-switched laser with intracavity sum frequency mixing in periodically poled KTP. Appl Phys B. 2004;79:207–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao P, Ragam S, Ding Y, Zotova I. Power scalability and frequency agility of compact terahertz source based on frequency mixing from solid-state lasers. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98:131106. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tanoto H, Teng J, Wu Q, Sun M, Chen Z, Maier S, et al. Greatly enhanced continuous-wave terahertz emission by nano-electrodes in photoconductive photomixer. Nature Photonics. 2012;6:121–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bernenko D, Li M, Månefjord H, Jansson S, Runemark A, Kirkeby C, et al. Insect diversity estimation in polarimetric lidar. PLoS One. 2024;19(11):e0312770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sun T, Guo Y, Wang T, Huo J, Zhang L. Widely tunable wavelength spacing dual-wavelength single longitudinal mode erbium doped fiber laser. Opt Fiber Technol. 2014;20:235–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Huang H, Xia J, Anh N, Li Y, Lü Y. Dual-wavelength operation at 607 nm and 640 nm with the same threshold and slope efficiency in Pr3 :LiLuF4 crystal. Photonics. 2025;12:447. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fan T, Byer R. Diode laser-pumped solid-state lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1988;24:895. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen Y. cw dual-wavelength operation of a diode-pumped Nd:YVO4 laser. Appl Phys B. 2000;70:475–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Findlay D, Clay R. The measurement of internal losses in 4-level lasers. Phys Lett. 1966;20:277–8. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Rajesh Sharma

25 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Xia,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 08 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Rajesh Sharma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements: 

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf .

2.  Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

 [This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62175209 and 62241506).]. 

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.""

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

[This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62175209 and 62241506).]

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

[This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62175209 and 62241506).]. 

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

5. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

Reviewer #1: Comments

The authors report a laser output at 1.4 μm is achieved in the Nd:LuGdAG crystal, corresponding maximum output power is 3.64 W with the slope efficiency of 23.7%. By tuning the angle of the Lyot filter, three distinct lasing wavelengths at 1414, 1426 and 1437 nm laser wavelengths were obtained. Besides, three pairs of dual-wavelength lasers operating at 1414 and 1426 nm, 1414 and 1437 nm, 1426 and 1437 nm were also achieved, respectively. The manuscript can be accepted for publication after some revisions. The suggestions are as follows:

1. What is the output wavelength and output power of Nd:LuGdAG laser without Lyot filter inserted into the resonant cavity?

2. What are the losses of the coupled lenses (L1 and L2)?

3. “The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 μm on the 4F3/2→4I11/2 [28], 0.9 μm on the 4F3/2→4I9/2 [29] and 1.3 μm on the 4F3/2→4I13/2 [30] transitions have been reported. To the best of our knowledge, CW lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LGAG have not been studied until now.” This sentence should be deleted. This sentence should be deleted because it is repetitive with the following sentence.

4. The author should provide the measurement method of the beam quality factor.

5. What does the parameter “Θ” in Eq. 3 represent? It is advisable for authors to express clearly it in the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Huang et al. reports on a tunable single- and dual-wavelength lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LuGdAG crystal. The authors demonstrate the wavelength tunability of the output and report on the maximum output power of 3.64 W, corresponding to 23.7% optical efficiency. In addition, three pairs of dual-wavelength lasers operating at 1.4 μm were also achieved. The results are novel, and the manuscript is well-written. The details of the experiment are provided adequately. I recommend the publication of the manuscript after the following corrections:

1. How did the author measure the output power at these close dual wavelengths separately?

2. In the introduction: “The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 μm on the 4F3/2→4I11/2 [28], 0.9 μm on the 4F3/2→4I9/2 [29] and 1.3 μm on the 4F3/2→4I13/2 [30] transitions have been reported. To the best of our knowledge, CW lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LGAG have not been studied until now. While The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 [28], 0.9 [29] and 1.3 μm [30] have been implemented successfully in prior studies, systematic research on CW laser generation at 1.4 μm in the Nd:LGAG has not been reported until now.”

These two sentences are repetitive. One of them should be deleted.

3. In the experimental setup: “A Nd:LGAG (1.0 at.% doping, 6 mm length) functioned as the active medium…” To my knowledge, the output parameters of the diode-pumped laser are related to the length and doping concentration of the laser crystal. Generally, the doping concentration of the gain medium in pure three-level lasers is very low to reduce thermal effects and reabsorption. How is the doping concentration of 1.0 at. % chosen?

4. What is the cavity mode radius? How is it determined, under considering the thermal lens effect?

5. How to measure the beam quality factor?

Reviewer #3: This paper presents a study on diode-pumped tunable single- and dual-wavelength laser operation in Nd:LGAG crystal. The research achieve the single- and dual-wavelength laser operation near the 1.4 μm spectral region in Nd:LGAG crystal, it has certain innovation and value.

The paper can better reflect the quality and significance of the research with appropriate supplements and improvements.

1. In Page 3” The cavity output coupler was a concave mirror (M2) with a radius of curvature of –200 mm, a transmittance (Toc) of 3.5% at 1410-1440 nm, and AR at 1060-1350 nm. Two other couplers (Toc = 3.5% and = 5.0%) were also carried out, with the M2 demonstrated the optimal output performance.” The other couplers of 3.5% is contradictory to the previous. And it is suggested to show the output powers at different transmittance.

2. It is excellent that the M2 factors of the 1414, 1426 and 1437 nm wavelengths were 1.16, 1.12 and 1.25 at the maximum output powers. Suggested add the test figure.

Reviewer #4: The work by Huang et al. investigated the diode-pumped tunable single- and dual-wavelength (DW) laser operation near 1.4 μm spectral region in Nd:LuGdAG (Nd:LGAG) crystal. The work may be of some significance for the development of solid-state lasers. But there remain many issues. I can’t recommend the acceptance till all my concerns below are well responded:

1.In the Introduction section, Fig. 1 displayed the emission spectrum of the Nd:LGAG in 1250 -1500 nm. Is it the result of the manuscript or the result of other literatures? And why do the authors include pictures in the Introduction section?

2.Fig. 5 displayed the laser spectra of the three single-wavelength lasers. Please provide the corresponding spectra at different pump powers.

3.The authors stated “Their corresponding M2 factors were 1.12 and 1.15, 1.18 and 1.24 and 1.22 and 1.27, respectively, and their power stabilities were about 2.5 and 2.9%, 2.8 and 3.8% and 3.5 and 4.2%, respectively”. The authors should prove the M2 factors and power stabilities by providing the corresponding pictures.

4.The authors can compare the performance of different lasers at near 1.4 μm to visually show the advantages of this work.

5.The English is casual at some places. Please check and revise the manuscript thoroughly and carefully.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 26;20(9):e0333387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333387.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


15 Aug 2025

Comments

Reviewer #1: The authors report a laser output at 1.4 μm is achieved in the Nd:LuGdAG crystal, corresponding maximum output power is 3.64 W with the slope efficiency of 23.7%. By tuning the angle of the Lyot filter, three distinct lasing wavelengths at 1414, 1426 and 1437 nm laser wavelengths were obtained. Besides, three pairs of dual-wavelength lasers operating at 1414 and 1426 nm, 1414 and 1437 nm, 1426 and 1437 nm were also achieved, respectively. The manuscript can be accepted for publication after some revisions. The suggestions are as follows:

1. What is the output wavelength and output power of Nd:LuGdAG laser without Lyot filter inserted into the resonant cavity?

Response: In fact, the Lyot filter has no loss to the operating wavelength (because the transmittance is 100% at the operating wavelength), it only suppresses other wavelengths besides the operating wavelength.

2. What are the losses of the coupled lenses (L1 and L2)?

Response: Two identical coupling lenses (L1 and L2) were antireflection coated at 808 nm. The total transmittance the lenses is greater than 98%, so we ignore the loss of the lenses. We describe the coupling efficiency of the two lenses in the revised version.

3. “The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 μm on the 4F3/2→4I11/2 [28], 0.9 μm on the 4F3/2→4I9/2 [29] and 1.3 μm on the 4F3/2→4I13/2 [30] transitions have been reported. To the best of our knowledge, CW lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LGAG have not been studied until now.” This sentence should be deleted. This sentence should be deleted because it is repetitive with the following sentence.

Response: We have deleted this repetitive sentence in the revised version.

4. The author should provide the measurement method of the beam quality factor.

Response: We have added the measurement method for beam quality factor in the revised version.

5. What does the parameter “Θ” in Eq. 3 represent? It is advisable for authors to express clearly it in the manuscript.

Response: Θ is the Heaviside step function, and we have explained it in the revised version.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Huang et al. reports on a tunable single- and dual-wavelength lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LuGdAG crystal. The authors demonstrate the wavelength tunability of the output and report on the maximum output power of 3.64 W, corresponding to 23.7% optical efficiency. In addition, three pairs of dual-wavelength lasers operating at 1.4 μm were also achieved. The results are novel, and the manuscript is well-written. The details of the experiment are provided adequately. I recommend the publication of the manuscript after the following corrections:

1. How did the author measure the output power at these close dual wavelengths separately?

Response: The 1.4 μm laser beam was separated using the flexible wavelength selector, and the output power of each wavelength was measured respectively.

2. In the introduction: “The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 μm on the 4F3/2→4I11/2 [28], 0.9 μm on the 4F3/2→4I9/2 [29] and 1.3 μm on the 4F3/2→4I13/2 [30] transitions have been reported. To the best of our knowledge, CW lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LGAG have not been studied until now. While The Nd:LGAG lasers at 1.1 [28], 0.9 [29] and 1.3 μm [30] have been implemented successfully in prior studies, systematic research on CW laser generation at 1.4 μm in the Nd:LGAG has not been reported until now.”

These two sentences are repetitive. One of them should be deleted.

Response: We have deleted this repetitive sentence in the revised version.

3. In the experimental setup: “A Nd:LGAG (1.0 at.% doping, 6 mm length) functioned as the active medium…” To my knowledge, the output parameters of the diode-pumped laser are related to the length and doping concentration of the laser crystal. Generally, the doping concentration of the gain medium in pure three-level lasers is very low to reduce thermal effects and reabsorption. How is the doping concentration of 1.0 at. % chosen?

Response: Usually, low doping reduces the thermal effect of crystals. However, the absorption efficiency of Nd:LGAG crystals is relatively low. Therefore, while ensuring high absorption efficiency, the doping concentration should be reduced as much as possible. We used 1.0% doping and a 6 mm long Nd:LGAG crystal, but the absorption efficiency of the crystal was 93.5%.

4. What is the cavity mode radius? How is it determined, under considering the thermal lens effect?

Response: The laser spot radius in the active medium was about 190 μm, which is calculated based on the ABCD matrix considering the crystal thermal lens.

5. How to measure the beam quality factor?

Response: We measured the M2 factor using the knife-edge technique. We have added it in the revised version.

Reviewer #3: This paper presents a study on diode-pumped tunable single- and dual-wavelength laser operation in Nd:LGAG crystal. The research achieve the single- and dual-wavelength laser operation near the 1.4 μm spectral region in Nd:LGAG crystal, it has certain innovation and value.

The paper can better reflect the quality and significance of the research with appropriate supplements and improvements.

Response: Thank you for your constructive comments on this study. There is no doubt that these professional suggestions provide important directions for improving the quality of papers.

1. In Page 3” The cavity output coupler was a concave mirror (M2) with a radius of curvature of –200 mm, a transmittance (Toc) of 3.5% at 1410-1440 nm, and AR at 1060-1350 nm. Two other couplers (Toc = 3.5% and = 5.0%) were also carried out, with the M2 demonstrated the optimal output performance.” The other couplers of 3.5% is contradictory to the previous. And it is suggested to show the output powers at different transmittance.

Response: Toc = 3.5% and = 5.0% should be Toc = 2.0% and = 5.0% respectively. We have corrected it in the revised version. To more clearly compare the slope efficiency of different emission wavelengths, we present the test results of three wavelengths in the same graph. Considering that displaying three curves with different transmittance simultaneously would lead to overly dense graphical information, we have supplemented the slope efficiency and threshold data of the other two wavelengths in the "Results and Discussion" section to ensure the complete presentation of the experimental data. This processing approach not only maintains the simplicity of the illustration but also fully presents all the key experimental data.

2. It is excellent that the M2 factors of the 1414, 1426 and 1437 nm wavelengths were 1.16, 1.12 and 1.25 at the maximum output powers. Suggested add the test figure.

Response: We measured the M2 factor using the knife-edge technique. The value of the M2 factor is calculated by the measured beam waist radius and beam divergence angle. We have supplemented the measurement method and corresponding measured data for beam quality in the revised version.

Reviewer #4: The work by Huang et al. investigated the diode-pumped tunable single- and dual-wavelength (DW) laser operation near 1.4 μm spectral region in Nd:LuGdAG (Nd:LGAG) crystal. The work may be of some significance for the development of solid-state lasers. But there remain many issues. I can’t recommend the acceptance till all my concerns below are well responded:

Response: We thank you very much for the kind consideration and constructive comments. All your comments are very professional, pertinent and kind, and will be of great help to the improvement of our manuscript. We have carefully revised the manuscript and provided the point-by-point response below in blue. The changes in the revised manuscript have been highlighted.

1. In the Introduction section, Fig. 1 displayed the emission spectrum of the Nd:LGAG in 1250 -1500 nm. Is it the result of the manuscript or the result of other literatures? And why do the authors include pictures in the Introduction section?

Response: The data in Figure 1 is calculated through Füchtbauer-Ladenburg formula. Figure 1 is introduced in the introduction section to show the emission peak of the Nd:LGAG crystal in the 1410-1440 nm band. The results of this spectral characteristic analysis naturally extend to the key working bands that this study intends to achieve.

2. Fig. 5 displayed the laser spectra of the three single-wavelength lasers. Please provide the corresponding spectra at different pump powers.

Response: In fact, the emission wavelength of the crystal does not drift with the change of pump power, so the emission spectrum is the same at any pump power.

3. The authors stated “Their corresponding M2 factors were 1.12 and 1.15, 1.18 and 1.24 and 1.22 and 1.27, respectively, and their power stabilities were about 2.5 and 2.9%, 2.8 and 3.8% and 3.5 and 4.2%, respectively”. The authors should prove the M2 factors and power stabilities by providing the corresponding pictures.

Response: We measured the M2 factor using the knife-edge technique. The value of the M2 factor is calculated by the measured beam waist radius and beam divergence angle. We have supplemented the corresponding measured data (Insets (a-c) of Fig.6) for beam quality in the revised version. In addition, we have also supplemented the measured pictures of the power stability in the revised version (Fig.6).

4. The authors can compare the performance of different lasers at near 1.4 μm to visually show the advantages of this work.

Response: This is a very good suggestion. We have added a comparison with a 1.4 μm wavelength laser at the end of the results and discussion. This can indeed visually demonstrate the advantages of this work.

5. The English is casual at some places. Please check and revise the manuscript thoroughly and carefully.

Response: We have conducted a comprehensive review and optimization of the English expression throughout the text to ensure that the language is smooth and natural, and the expression is accurate and standardized.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-26624-Comments.docx

pone.0333387.s002.docx (23.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Rajesh Sharma

15 Sep 2025

Tunable single- and dual-wavelength lasers around 1.4 μm in Nd:LuGdAG crystal

PONE-D-25-26624R1

Dear Dr. Xia,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Rajesh Sharma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewer #1:

Reviewer #2:

Reviewer #4:

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

Reviewer #1: The authors have fully resolved all the issues I raised in their revision. Therefore, I recommend that the manuscript be accepted for publication in its current form.

Reviewer #2: The queries raised have been addressed satisfactorily by the authors, and I can recommend the publication of this article.

Reviewer #4: In the manuscript, the author has made revisions according to my review comments, and the paper can be accepted.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Rajesh Sharma

PONE-D-25-26624R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xia,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Rajesh Sharma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-26624-Comments.docx

    pone.0333387.s002.docx (23.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES