Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1987 Jul 18;295(6591):176–179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6591.176

Resistance of clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae in United Kingdom 1986.

M Powell 1, C Koutsia-Carouzou 1, D Voutsinas 1, A Seymour 1, J D Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1247032  PMID: 3115364

Abstract

Between 1 January and 31 March 1986, 2434 strains of Haemophilus influenzae collected from 23 laboratories in the United Kingdom were examined. With the same criteria as previous studies in 1977 and 1981 the prevalence of resistance was: ampicillin 7.8% (6.2% beta-lactamase producers and 1.6% non-producers), tetracycline 2.7%, chloramphenicol 1.7%, trimethoprim 4.2%, and sulphamethoxazole 3.5%. of the 87 capsulated strains, 15 produced beta-lactamase, nine were resistant to ampicillin but did not produce beta-lactamase, and two strains, one of which produced beta-lactamase, were resistant to chloramphenicol and tetracycline. Since 1977 the prevalence of resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim has increased significantly. During 1981-6 strains resistant to ampicillin but not producing beta-lactamase and strains resistant to trimethoprim have significantly increased.

Full text

PDF
176

Images in this article

179p179-a
on p.179

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campos J., Garcia-Tornel S., Sanfeliu I. Susceptibility studies of multiply resistant Haemophilus influenzae isolated from pediatric patients and contacts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jun;25(6):706–709. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.6.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Catlin B. W. Iodometric detection of Haemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase: rapid presumptive test for ampicillin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Mar;7(3):265–270. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.3.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dabernat H., Delmas C., Lareng M. B. Prévalence de la résistance aux antibiotiques des Haemophilus influenzae isolés en France: un an d'activité du réseau de surveillance des infections à H. influenzae. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1986 May;34(5):372–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doern G. V., Jorgensen J. H., Thornsberry C., Preston D. A. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: a collaborative study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Feb;4(2):95–107. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90143-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Howard A. J., Hince C. J., Williams J. D. Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. Report of a study group on bacterial resistance. Br Med J. 1978 Jun 24;1(6128):1657–1660. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6128.1657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kilian M. A rapid method for the differentiation of Haemophilus strains. The porphyrin test;. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Dec;82(6):835–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1974.tb02381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kilian M. A taxonomic study of the genus Haemophilus, with the proposal of a new species. J Gen Microbiol. 1976 Mar;93(1):9–62. doi: 10.1099/00221287-93-1-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Long S. S., Teter M. J., Gilligan P. H. Biotype of Haemophilus influenzae: correlation with virulence and ampicillin resistance. J Infect Dis. 1983 May;147(5):800–806. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.5.800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mendelman P. M., Chaffin D. O., Stull T. L., Rubens C. E., Mack K. D., Smith A. L. Characterization of non-beta-lactamase-mediated ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):235–244. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oberhofer T. R., Back A. E. Biotypes of Haemophilus encountered in clinical laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):168–174. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.168-174.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parr T. R., Jr, Bryan L. E. Mechanism of resistance of an ampicillin-resistant, beta-lactamase-negative clinical isolate of Haemophilus influenzae type b to beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jun;25(6):747–753. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.6.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Philpott-Howard J., Williams J. D. Increase in antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae in the United Kingdom since 1977: report of study group. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 May 29;284(6329):1597–1599. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Serfass D. A., Mendelman P. M., Chaffin D. O., Needham C. A. Ampicillin resistance and penicillin-binding proteins of Haemophilus influenzae. J Gen Microbiol. 1986 Oct;132(10):2855–2861. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-10-2855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shaw W. V., Brodsky R. F. Characterization of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase from chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jan;95(1):28–36. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.1.28-36.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES