Abstract
Electrosynthesis of NH3 from low-concentration NO (NORR) in neutral media offers a sustainable nitrogen fixation strategy but is hindered by weak NO adsorption, slow water dissociation, and sluggish hydrogenation kinetics. Herein, we propose an intriguing strategy that successfully overcomes these limitations through using an electron-donating motif to modulate NO-affinitive catalysts, thereby creating dual active site with synergistic functionality. Specifically, we integrate electron-donating nanoparticles into a Fe single-atom catalyst (FeSAC), where Fe sites ensure strong NO adsorption, while electron-donating motifs promote water dissociation and NO hydrogenation. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), in situ attenuated total reflection-infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), and theoretical calculations reveal that electron-donating motifs increase Fe site electron density, strengthening NO adsorption. Additionally, these motifs also promote water dissociation, supplying protons to lower the NO hydrogenation barrier. This synergistic interplay enables a cascade reaction mechanism, delivering a remarkable Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 90.3% and a NH3 yield rate of 709.7 µg h−1 mgcat.−1 under 1.0 vol% NO in neutral media, outperforming pure FeSAC (NH3 yield rate: 444.2 µg h−1 mgcat.−1, FE: 56.6%) and prior to systems operating under high NO concentrations. Notably, the high NH3 yield of 3207.7 μg h−1 mgcat.−1 is achieved in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolyzer under a 1.0 vol% NO. This work establishes an inspirational paradigm in NORR by simultaneously enhancing NO adsorption, water dissociation, and hydrogenation kinetics, providing a scalable route for efficient NH3 electrosynthesis from dilute NO sources.
Subject terms: Electrocatalysis, Electronic properties and materials, Electrocatalysis
Weak NO adsorption, slow water dissociation, and sluggish hydrogenation hinder neutral-media NH3 electrosynthesis from low-concentration NO. Here, the authors report an electron-donating motif modulating a NO-affinitive catalyst to create dual active sites, thus facilitating NO-to-NH3 conversion.
Introduction
Nitric oxide (NO) is a harmful atmospheric pollutant primarily emitted from industrial processes and vehicle exhaust, posing severe environmental and health risks1–6. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the predominant method for mitigating NO emissions6–10. Nevertheless, it requires temperatures of 300-400 °C and uses ammonia as a reducing agent, thus restricting its efficiency under near-ambient conditions and failing to generate any value-added products. Electrochemical NO reduction (NORR) under mild conditions, utilizing renewable electricity and water, offers a sustainable route to both NO removal and ammonia (NH3) production—an essential fertilizer and potential hydrogen carrier—via a carbon-free process11–13. Large-scale NORR requires neutral water conditions to enable earth-abundant transition metal catalysts, which are unstable in acidic media, and to facilitate direct seawater use without desalination14–18. However, its efficiency in neutral media is severely restricted by low NO solubility, sluggish water dissociation, and slow NO hydrogenation kinetics.
Most current research focuses on engineering electron-deficient sites to strengthen NO adsorption for NORR under neutral media, even at low NO concentrations19–26. Among these catalysts, Fe-based catalysts exhibit remarkable efficiency in enhancing the performance of low-concentration NORR22,25,26. This becomes particularly effective when Fe sites are in a low oxidation state with sharp d-state defect features, enabling energy-aligned orbital configurations that facilitate the adsorption and activation of NO molecules23. Moreover, as one of the most cost-effective and abundant elements in the earth27, Fe also plays a pivotal role in biological nitrogenases, enabling efficient natural nitrogen fixation28. However, the current approach of enhancing NO affinity on catalysts overlooks the critical challenge of inherently slow water dissociation and NO hydrogenation kinetics in neutral media.
Electron-donating materials have demonstrated significant catalytic efficiency in water dissociation reactions29,30, which are essential for supplying protons to promote NO hydrogenation21–24. Inspired by aforementioned guidance, we propose an innovative and universal strategy to improve neutral NORR performance by integrating electron-donating motifs into NO-affinitive catalysts, forming a dual-active-site architecture with synergistic functionality. To demonstrate this strategy and its underlying mechanism, we selected Pt nanoparticles as the electron donor, incorporated into an Fe single-atom catalyst (FeSAC) with NO-affinitive ability, as a representative case for detailed analysis. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), attenuated total reflection-infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), and density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirmed that PtNPs serve as electron donors, increasing the electron density at the Fe sites for stronger NO adsorption, while also facilitating water dissociation to supply protons and significantly promoting the subsequent hydrogenation of NO intermediate. The synergistic interplay between these dual sites enables a cascade reaction mechanism. As a result, the PtNPs/FeSAC catalyst achieved a NH3 yield rate of 709.7 μg h−1 mgcat.−1 and a Faraday efficiency (FE) of 90.3% at −0.6 V under 1.0 vol% NO/Ar in neutral media, outperforming FeSAC alone (NH3 yield rate: 444.2 μg h−1 mgcat.−1, FE: 56.6%) and surpassing previously reported NORR systems under high NO concentrations (above 10%) in various medias. Notably, in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolyzer, the system achieved the NH3 yield of 3207.7 μg h−1 mgcat.−1. This approach was successfully extended to other electron-donating nanoparticles, such as Au, highlighting its broad applicability for efficient NORR in neutral media.
Results and discussion
Theoretical calculations
DFT calculations were performed to understand the mechanism underlying the enhanced NORR activity. Fe single atoms coordinated with pyridine-4N in graphene (FeN4) were chosen as the catalyst model due to their high stability (Fig. 1a)31. To simulate the nanoparticle environment, nine Pt atoms were introduced into the FeN4 structure (FeN4-Pt, Fig. 1b). Before Pt loading, Fe single atom in FeN4 exhibited partially unoccupied orbitals above the Fermi level (Fig. 1c). After Pt loading, these unoccupied orbitals shifted towards the Fermi level, indicating electron injection into Fe (Fig. 1d). Bader charge analysis confirmed that Fe received ~0.16e- (Fig. 1e), increasing its electron density and reactivity32. In Supplementary Fig. 2, the charge density difference analysis of Fe site in FeN4-Pt demonstrated markedly increased electron density accumulation relative to those in FeN4, suggesting that Pt species exhibit electron-donating characteristics that enhance the electronic environment at Fe active centers. Therefore, the incorporation of Pt nanoparticle into FeN4 creates a dual active site (Fig.1f).
Fig. 1. Theoretical calculations.
Atom configurations of (a) FeN4 and (b) FeN4-Pt. Atom color-coding: brown, iron; blue, nitrogen; grey, carbon; cyan, platinum. Corresponding DOS plots of Fe atom in (c) FeN4 and (d) FeN4-Pt. e Bader charge analysis of Fe atom in FeN4 and FeN4-Pt, respectively. f Schematic diagram of dual site catalyst. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
We firstly investigated water dissociation on both FeN4 and FeN4-Pt sites (Figs. 2a, b). On FeN4 site, the dissociation of H2O into *H and *OH required a free energy of 1.45 eV. However, in FeN4-Pt, H2O adsorbed at Pt sites, reducing the dissociation energy to 0.99 eV, demonstrating the role of Pt in facilitating proton supply for NORR.
Fig. 2. Reaction mechanism.
The free energy of water dissociation on (a) FeN4 and (b) FeN4-Pt. Atom color-coding: brown, iron; blue, nitrogen; grey, carbon; cyan, platinum; white, hydrogen; red, oxygen. c The reaction free energies of NORR pathways on FeN4 and FeN4-Pt. d Comparation between traditional and cascade mechanisms. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Next, the free energy pathway for NO to NH3 conversion was calculated and a significant enhancement in the NO adsorption capability on FeN4-Pt (−1.36 eV) compared to FeN4 (0.05 eV) was revealed (Fig. 2c). The first proton step (*NO → *HNO) was energetically favorable on both catalysts, but the activation barrier was reduced from 1.50 eV (FeN4) to 0.54 eV (FeN4-Pt). The second protonation led to the formation of *NH2O (FeN4-Pt, ΔG = 0.55 eV) instead of *HNOH (FeN4, ΔG = 0.40 eV), thus shifting the reaction pathway. The third protonation on FeN4-Pt led to *NH2OH formation, but its high desorption energy (3.18 eV) made *NH2OH an unlikely byproduct. Instead, *NH2OH underwent hydrogenation to *NH2 + H2O, followed by an exothermic step to NH3 (ΔG = 0.23 eV).
Overall, PtNPs enhance NORR by donating electrons to Fe, strengthening NO adsorption, and accelerating water dissociation to supply protons for NO hydrogenation. This synergistic cascade mechanism significantly boosts NH3 synthesis efficiency in neutral low-concentration NO conditions (Fig. 2d).
Catalyst characterization
The FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC catalysts were synthesized based on computational guidance. FeSAC was synthesized through pyrolysis followed by acid etching, while PtNPs were subsequently loaded onto FeSAC by a thermal reduction method. High-aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of FeSAC (Fig. 3a) revealed that isolated atomic sites are randomly dispersed on nitrogen doped carbon (NC) without observable metal clusters or particles, consistent with the X-ray diffraction (XRD, Supplementary Fig. 3) result. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) confirmed a Fe content of 0.66 wt% in FeSAC (Supplementary Table 1).
Fig. 3. Structural characterizations of catalysts.
HAADF-STEM images of (a) FeSAC and (b, c) PtNPs/FeSAC. d EDX mapping images of PtNPs/FeSAC. e Fe K-edge XANES spectra of Fe foil, FePc, Fe2O3, FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC. f FT-EXAFS spectra at Fe K-edge. g XPS spectrum of PtNPs/FeSAC in Pt 4 f region. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
In contrast, HAADF-STEM images of PtNPs/FeSAC showed PtNPs with a size of ~3 nm and a lattice distance of 0.214 nm, corresponding to the (111) crystal plane (Fig. 3b). XRD pattern further confirmed the presence of PtNPs (Supplementary Fig. 3). As illustrated in Fig. 3c, FeSAC are densely distributed around Pt nanoparticles, and energy dispersion X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, Fig. 3d) mapping confirmed the uniform dispersion of Fe, C, and N elements, with Pt as the primary nanoparticle component. ICP-OES results showed Fe and Pt contents of 0.62 wt% and 0.84 wt%, respectively (Supplementary Table 1).
To investigate the chemical state and atomic structure, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were employed. The Fe K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra revealed that Fe in FeSAC lies between +2 and +3 oxidation states (Fig. 3e). Notably, Pt incorporation induces a negative shift in the Fe K-edge, indicating a reduced Fe oxidation state, consistent with the theoretical predictions shown in Fig. 1.
Fourier transformed (FT) k2-weighted extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis (Fig. 3f) confirmed the absence of Fe clusters, as FePc, FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC exhibited a prominent Fe-N scattering peak at 1.51 Å33,34. EXAFS fitting curves revealed that the average coordination numbers of FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC are 4.4 and 4.2, respectively, indicating that Fe is coordinated with four nitrogen atoms (Fe-N4) in both systems. The bond lengths for Fe-N are 1.96 and 1.97 Å, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2). Additionally, wavelet transform (WT) analysis of Fe K-edge EXAFS oscillations (Supplementary Fig. 5) displays a strong signal with a maximum intensity at 3.8 Å−1 for PtNPs/FeSAC, corresponding to the Fe-N first coordination shell, which is similar to FeSAC33. Impressively, no Fe-Fe signal was detected in WT contour plots for either FeSAC or PtNPs/FeSAC, further confirming the atomically dispersed Fe in both catalysts.
XPS analysis of the Pt 4 f region (Fig. 3g) showed two Pt0 peaks at 71.8 (4f7/2) and 75.1 eV (4f5/2) along with two Pt2+ peaks at 72.7 (4f7/2) and 76.0 eV (4f5/2) in PtNPs/FeSAC (Fig. 2g), likely due to partial surface oxidation or electron donation from adjacent Fe atoms35,36. The successful synthesis and characterization of PtNPs/FeSAC confirmed its distinct structural features, including reduced Fe oxidation states upon Pt incorporation and stable Fe-N4 coordination.
In situ spectroscopy
To demonstrate the cascade reaction mechanism during the dynamic catalytic process of NORR in the PtNPs/FeSAC dual-site catalyst, in situ electrochemical XAS and attenuated total reflection-infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopies were conducted. As shown in Fe K-edge XANES spectra of PtNPs/FeSAC (Fig. 4a), the white-line peak intensity increased as the applied potential decreases from open circuit potential (OCP) to −0.3 V, indicating that NO adsorption on Fe sites leads to an increase in coordination number. A shift of the adsorption edge to higher energy suggested an increased oxidation state of Fe. As the potential further decreased to −0.6 V, the white-line peak intensity diminished, implying NO consumption and reduction of Fe valence state, confirming FeSAC as the real active sites.
Fig. 4. In situ XAS and ATR-IR spectra of NORR.
a In situ Fe K-edge XANES spectra of PtNPs/FeSAC at different potentials (without iR-correction). (Inset) Magnified white-line peak and pre-edge XANES region. b Corresponding FT-EXAFS spectra at Fe K-edge (without iR-correction). Potential-dependent in situ ATR-IR spectra of (c) FeSAC and (e) PtNPs/FeSAC (without iR-correction). Corresponding 2D ATR-IR contour map of (d) FeSAC and (f) PtNPs/FeSAC (without iR-correction). g Reaction mechanisms. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
The EXAFS spectra (Fig. 4b) further revealed the dynamic evolution of Fe’s local coordination. The Fe-N peak was enhanced with decreasing the applied potentials, suggesting that the intermediates adsorb on Fe sites. A notable negative shift from OCP to −0.3 V, suggested the formation of a shorter Fe-N bond due to NO adsorption. When the potential was further reduced to −0.6 V, the peak moved from 1.53 to 1.58 Å, signaling the occurrence of NORR and aligning well with the XANES results.
Next, in situ ATR-IR spectroscopy was employed to identify the adsorbed intermediates. As shown in Figs. 4c and 4e, both FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC display peaks corresponding to NO adsorption, including vertical mode (NOv) and bent mode NOb)22,37. Specifically, for FeSAC, the NOv and NOb peaks were observed at 1743.4 and 1694.5 cm−1, respectively. Similarly, in the spectra of PtNPs/FeSAC, the NOv and NOb peaks appeared at 1743.3 and 1693.2 cm−1, respectively. No significant peak shift was observed, suggesting NO molecule was adsorbed on the similar active site in both catalysts. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 9, the Pt nanoparticles supported on NC (PtNPs) exhibits only a strong H2O adsorption peak under a 1.0 vol% NO/Ar atmosphere, which indicates that the Fe single atom site remains the primary adsorption site for NO in PtNPs/FeSAC. Besides, the adsorption energies of NO on Fe sites and Pt sites were systematically evaluated. For Pt sites, two distinct adsorption configurations (Supplementary Fig. 10b,c) were analyzed, revealing positive adsorption free energies of 0.36 eV and 0.53 eV, respectively. In contrast, the adsorption energy of NO on Fe site was determined to be −1.36 eV (Supplementary Fig. 10a). These results strongly suggest that NO has a significantly higher affinity for Fe site than for Pt site.
Impressively, the higher intensity of these peaks in PtNPs/FeSAC indicated stronger NO adsorption. With the potentials shifted from OCP to −1.0 V, the intensity of NOb peak increased, suggesting effective NO activation at Fe sites. As illustrated in Figs. 4d and 4f, the NOb peak intensity in PtNPs/FeSAC spectra is much stronger than that of FeSAC, implying that the lower valence state of Fe site induced by introduction of Pt nanoparticles is more conducive to activate NO, in agreement with the DFT results shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The NO temperature-programmed desorption (NO-TPD) measurement was conducted to evaluate the NO adsorption capability. In Supplementary Fig. 11, the NO chemisorption peak for FeSAC appeared at 247.2 °C, while that of PtNPs/FeSAC was observed at a higher temperature of 266.8 °C. The elevated desorption temperature indicates stronger NO adsorption on PtNPs/FeSAC, suggesting that the introduction of Pt nanoparticles enhances the NO binding affinity.
Compared to FeSAC, the peak of -OH bending vibration at 1648 cm−1 was strengthened in PtNPs/FeSAC spectra, indicating that the Pt nanoparticles facilitate H2O electrolysis to produce *H, which is beneficial for subsequent NO hydrogenation (Figs. 4d, f)38,39. This was further verified by the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and H2-TPD techniques40–43. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 12, the PtNPs/FeSAC and FeSAC were electrolyzed in Ar-saturated 0.5 M K2SO4 electrolyte for 10 min at −0.6 V and −0.7 V respectively, and then the EPR tests were conducted immediately. The distinct hydrogen radical signals were detected for PtNPs/FeSAC but not in FeSAC, which confirmed that the introduction of Pt nanoparticles facilitated the electrochemical generation of hydrogen radicals. However, when the PtNPs/FeSAC was tested in NO-saturated 0.5 M K2SO4 electrolyte for 10 min at −0.6 V, the signal of hydrogen radicals disappeared, proving that the hydrogen radicals were involved in the NORR reaction (Supplementary Fig. 13). Besides, H2-TPD experiments were also carried out to investigate the hydrogen spillover effect. The H2 desorption peak of PtNPs/FeSAC (303.4 °C) exhibited a positive shift compared to that of FeSAC (274.3 °C), indicating a stronger binding strength between hydrogen and PtNPs/FeSAC catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 14). This finding implies that the presence of Pt nanoparticles increases the hydrogen concentration around the Pt sites, thereby triggering the hydrogen spillover effect that facilitates the NO hydrogenation43. Hydrogenated intermediates NHx (1412 and 1530 cm−1) were progressively formed at lower potentials, ultimately converting to NH4+ (1465 cm−1)44–46. Moreover, when PtNPs/FeSAC was tested under Ar atmosphere, only a strong peak corresponding to H2O was observed, confirming the signals of hydrogenated intermediates derive from NO (Supplementary Fig. 15). Overall, these results clearly demonstrated PtNPs served as electron donors, increasing Fe site electron density to enhance NO adsorption while simultaneously promoting water dissociation to supply protons for efficient NORR. These results clearly demonstrated that a cascade reaction mechanism occurs on the dual-site catalyst, PtNPs/FeSAC, thereby promoting NORR (Fig. 4g).
NORR performance evaluation
The NORR performance was evaluated in 0.5 M K2SO4 electrolyte, using an air-tight H cell. Prior to electrolysis, high-purity Ar was purged into the electrolyte to remove residual oxygen. As shown in Fig. 5a, the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves revealed a significant increase in current density for PtNPs/FeSAC in 1 vol% NO atmosphere compared to Ar-saturated conditions, confirming effective NO reduction on the catalyst surface. Compare to FeSAC, PtNPs and NC, the PtNPs/FeSAC showed the largest current density gap, indicating superior NORR activity (Supplementary Fig. 16).
Fig. 5. Electrochemical NORR performance.
a LSV curves of FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC in Ar- and 1 vol% NO-saturated 0.5 M K2SO4 (pH =7.1, without iR-correction) at scan rate of 10 mV s−1. b NH3 yield and FE with 1 vol% NO over PtNPs/FeSAC at each given potential (without iR-correction). c The NH3 yield of PtNPs, NC, FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC. d NH3 yield of PtNPs/FeSAC under different conditions. e1H NMR spectra of the electrolyte fed by 15NO and 14NO for NORR over the PtNPs/FeSAC at −0.6 V (without iR-correction). f NORR cycling stability test over the PtNPs/FeSAC at −0.6 V (without iR-correction). g LSV curves of PtNPs/FeSAC test in MEA electrolyzer and H cell at scan rate of 10 mV s−1 (without iR-correction). h Corresponding NH3 yield and FE of PtNPs/FeSAC (without iR-correction). i Comparison of NORR performance with other electrocatalysts. Error bars indicate the relative standard deviations of the mean (n = 3). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
As depicted in Fig. 5b, the NH3 yield rate and FE of PtNPs/FeSAC increase steadily with applied potentials from -0.4 to -0.6 V, reaching the maximum values of 709.7 μg h−1 mgcat.−1 and 90.3% at −0.6 V, outperforming previously reported NORR catalysts (Supplementary Table 4). NH3 quantification via colorimetric method (Supplementary Fig. 17) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 18) yielded consistent results, ensuring measurement accuracy (Supplementary Fig. 19). However, at the applied potentials beyond −0.6 V, NORR performance of PtNPs/FeSAC declined due to the competing HER (Supplementary Fig. 20). Other liquid byproducts such as N2H4 and NH2OH were not detected (Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22). In comparison, FeSAC obtained its highest NORR performance at -0.7 V with a NH3 yield of 444.2 μg h−1 mgcat.−1 and FE of 56.6% (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 23), while PtNPs/NC and bare NC exhibited negligible NORR activity (Fig. 5c).
As shown in Supplementary Fig. 26, PtNPs/FeSAC exhibits a significantly higher NH3 partial current densities than FeSAC, which confirms the superior intrinsic activity of PtNPs/FeSAC towards NORR. We also conducted electrochemical NORR tests under 10 vol% NO/Ar to explore the mechanistic origin of the activity enhancement. In Supplementary Fig. 27, the PtNPs/FeSAC achieved an enhanced NH3 yield rate of 1562.9 µg h−1 mgcat.−1 and FE of 92.3% under 10 vol% NO/Ar compared to 1.0 vol% NO/Ar condition. The remarkable improvement in performance primarily originates from an acceleration of the NO adsorption step rather than solely the intrinsic catalytic activity, indicating the mass transport and surface NO availability are important limiting factors under lower concentrations. In addition, the turnover frequency (TOF) values of FeSAC and PtNPs/FeSAC are 194.2 h−1 and 344.2 h−1, respectively, under 1.0 vol% NO/Ar atmosphere. The significantly enhanced TOF value suggests that the Pt nanoparticle introduction facilitates a quick water dissociation and thereby accelerates the turnover frequency of the NO reduction sites.
DFT and in-situ electrochemical experiments clearly verified that PtNPs served as electron donors, increasing the electron density at the Fe single-atom site to promote NO adsorption, while facilitating water dissociation for proton supply and promoting NO hydrogenation. This dual role enabled efficient NO-to-NH3 conversion with high activity and selectivity by activating the cascade reaction mechanism.
To validate that NH3 originated from NO reduction, control experiments were conducted under three conditions: (1) electrolysis at −0.6 V in Ar-saturated electrolyte, (2) testing at OCP in NO-saturated electrolyte, and (3) testing in NO-saturated electrolyte with bare carbon paper (CP) as work electrode (Fig. 5d). Only negligible NH3 was detected in these cases, confirming that NH3 formation on PtNPs/FeSAC exclusively results from NO reduction. Additionally, an isotope labeling experiment was performed to exclude the possibility of nitrogen contamination. The laboratory-produced 15NO was used as the feeding gas for NORR at −0.6 V for 1 h. As shown in Fig. 5e, the NMR analysis conclusively verified that the generated NH3 is originated from NO.
Electrocatalyst stability is crucial for long-term energy conversion and storage. PtNPs/FeSAC demonstrated excellent durability, maintaining stable NH3 yield and FE over ten consecutive cycles (Fig. 5f). A long-term stability test (>70 h, Supplementary Fig. 30) showed no significant decline in current density, further confirming its robust electrochemical stability. Post-reaction characterization revealed minor catalyst changes: XRD pattern showed weakened Pt diffraction peaks, suggesting partial Pt dissolution (Supplementary Fig. 31). ICP analysis detected trace amounts of Pt in the electrolyte post-NORR (Supplementary Table 3). XANES analysis exhibited a slight increase in Fe valence state after NORR test (Supplementary Fig. 32a). EXAFS spectra revealed no Fe-Fe bond formation, confirming Fe remains atomically dispersed (Supplementary Fig. 32b). XPS spectrum of Pt exhibited two dominant peaks at 72.1 and 74.8 eV, which were attributed to Pt0 4f7/2 and Pt0 4f5/2, respectively, indicating that a small amount of Pt oxide species on the catalyst surface were reduced (Supplementary Fig. 33).
To mitigate NO mass transport limitations due to its low solubility (~1.92 mmol L−1 atm−1 in water at 25 °C), NORR was conducted in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolyzer (Supplementary Fig. 34)47,48. Compared to H-cell, the MEA significantly enhanced current density, suggesting improved NO utilization (Fig. 5g). As shown in Fig. 5h, increasing the applied cell voltage from 1.2 to 1.6 V vs. cell voltage leads to higher NH3 yield and FE. Notably, PtNPs/FeSAC achieved the high NH3 yield of 3207.7 μg h−1 mgcat.−1 and FE of 95.6% at 1.6 V vs. cell voltage (Fig. 5h), surpassing all previously reported NORR catalyst even tests under high NO concentration (Fig. 5i).
To explore alternative metal nanoparticles, AuNPs/FeSAC was synthesized for NO-to-NH3 conversion. TEM images (Supplementary Fig. 35) and XRD patterns (Supplementary Fig. 36) clearly verified that successful Au nanoparticle deposition. The obtained AuNPs/FeSAC achieved optimal NH3 yield of 595.4 μg h−1 mgcat.−1 and FE of 78.9% at -0.5 V, further demonstrating the versatility of metal-modified FeSAC systems (Supplementary Fig. 37).
In summary, we present an electron-donating particle-mediated strategy that integrates PtNPs as the electron donor into the FeSAC electrocatalyst to construct dual-active-site architectures, thereby enhancing NO adsorption while promoting water dissociation and NO hydrogenation for significantly improving neutral NORR at low NO concentration (1 vol%). In situ spectro-electrochemical experiments, coupled with theoretical calculations, confirmed that the Pt nanoparticles serve as electron donors, increasing the electron density at the Fe single-atom site to promote NO adsorption, while facilitating water dissociation to provide protons and thus reducing the activation energy of NO hydrogenation. The synergistic interplay between these dual sites enables a cascade reaction mechanism achieving a superior NORR performance with a NH3 FE up to 90.3% and a high NH3 yield rate of 709.7 µg h−1 mgcat.−1 under 1 vol% NO concentration at −0.6 V, outperforming FeSAC (NH3 yield rate: 444.2 µg h−1 mgcat.−1, FE: 56.6%) and prior to systems operating under high NO concentrations. Notably, in a MEA electrolyzer, the system achieved the NH3 yield of 3207.7 μg h−1 mgcat.−1. This work not only offers an attractive earth-abundant nanocatalyst for NH3 electrosynthesis at low NO concentrations, but also provides an innovative methodology for designing superior electrocatalytic NORR systems through a dual-active-site strategy, paving the way for large scale NH3 electrosynthesis.
Methods
Chemicals
Ketjen black ecp600JD (KJ), Nafion and carbon paper (CP) were purchased from Suzhou Sinero Thechology Co., Ltd (Suzhou, China). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, A. R. grade), sodium nitrite (NaNO2, A. R. grade), p-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (pAA, C6H7NO3S, A. R. grade) m-phenylenediamine (mPDA, C6H8N2, 99.5%) ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8, A. R. grade), iron chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, 99%), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Mw24000), sodium hypochlorite (NaClO, 6–14% active chlorine basis) and ethylene glycol (EG, A. R. grade) were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chloroplatinic acid hexahydrate (H2PtCl6·6H2O, A. R. grade), gold chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, A. R. grade), salicylic acid (C7H6O3, A. R. grade), trisodium citrate dihydrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O, A. R. grade), sodium nitroferricyanide (III) dihydrate (Na2Fe(CN)5NO·2H2O, A. R. grade), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6, 99.9%), ammonium chloride (14NH4Cl, A. R. grade; 15NH4Cl, 99atom %), sodium borohydride (NaNH4, A. R. grade) and sodium nitrite (Na15NO2, 99atom %) were bought from Macklin Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Fe powder (99.9%), potassium thiocyanate (KSCN, A. R. grade) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, A. R. grade) were supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All the reagents were used as received. The water used throughout all experiments was purchased from Wahaha Group Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China).
Preparation of NC
1.0 g of KJ was dispersed in 30 mL H2O and sonicated in an ice bath for 2 h to labeled A1. Separately, 0.74 g pAA was dissolved in 30 mL H2O. To this solution, 9 mL of 1 M NaOH, 4 mL of 1 M NaNO2 and 21 mL of 1 M HCl were added to prepare the diazo salt (labeled A2), maintain the reaction at 0 °C. Subsequently, the A2 was mixed with A1. To initiate surface grafting of the diazonium salt, 0.7 g of reduced Fe powder was introduced. Afterward, 25 mL concentrated HCl, 7.6 g of mPDA, 23 mL of 1 M FeCl3 and 70 mL of 2 M (NH4)2S2O8 solution were added, and the reaction was allowed to react overnight. After filtration, the product was washed with water for 3 times and vacuum drying overnight to yield the NC precursor.
Preparation of FeSAC
0.6 g of the NC precursor was ultrasonically dispersed in 30 mL H2O, followed by the addition of 1.8 mL of 1 M FeCl3 and 6 mL of 1 M KSCN. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation, and the residue was heated to 950 °C for 1 h under an Ar atmosphere. The obtained black powder was dispersed in 50 mL of 1 M HCl solution overnight at 80 °C. Then, the powder was washed with water 3 times, and drying overnight. Finally, the dried powder was heated at 950 °C for 3 h in an Ar atmosphere to yield FeSAC.
Preparation of PtNPs/FeSAC
100 mg FeSAC was dispersed in 20 mL of EG. Next, 5 mg H2PtCl6·6H2O was dispersed in 20 mL of EG and then dripped into FeSAC. The obtained suspension was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and then treated at 160 °C for 90 min. Afterward, the final product was washed 3 times and dried overnight. The PtNPs was synthesized by replacing the FeSAC to NC.
Preparation of AuNPs/FeSAC
100 mg of FeSAC and 10 mg of PVP were dispersed in 30 mL H2O. Then, 400 μL of a 10 mg/mL HAuCl4 solution was added dropwise, followed by 100 mg of NaNH4 dissolved in 20 mL H2O to reduce HAuCl4. The mixture was stirred for 10 min at room temperature.
Preparation of work electrodes
10 mg catalyst powder was dispersed in 950 μL ethanol and 50 Nafion mixture by sonication for 2 h. Next, 100 homogenous ink was dropped on CP (1*1 cm2) and dried at room temperature. The catalyst loading is 1 mg cm-2.
Characterizations
XRD patterns were collected by a LabX XRD-6100 X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 30 mA) of wavelength 0.154 nm (SHIMADZU, Japan). TEM images were acquired on a Hitachi H-8100 electron microscopy (HITACHI, Japan), equipped with EDS mapping. XPS measurements were conducted on an ESCALABMK II X-ray photoelectron spectrometer using Mg as the exciting source. In situ electrochemical ATR-FTIR spectra were obtained by using a Thermo iS50. The XAS spectra were performed at the BL11B beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). The incident photons were monochromatized by a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator. The absorbance data of spectrophotometer were measured on SHIMADZU UV-1800 ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer.
Electrochemical measurements
Firstly, the Nafion 211 membrane was protonated in 5 wt% H2O2 at 80 °C for 1 h, then treated in 0.5 M H2SO4 for 3 h, and finally soaked in water for 6 h. All steps were performed at 80 °C. Electrochemical measurements were performed with a CHI660E electrochemical station (CH Instruments, Inc., Shanghai) in a H-cell under ambient condition, which was separated by Nafion 211 membrane. All the NORR tests were conducted in 0.5 M K2SO4 electrolyte (30 mL, pH = 7.1), which was stored at room temperature. The PtNPs/FeSAC, Ag/AgCl and graphite rod acted as the working electrode (WE), reference electrode (RE) and counter electrode (CE), respectively. The reference electrode was calibrated to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale in all measurements using the following equation:
| 1 |
All data are presented without iR-correction. High purity Ar gas (99.999%) was bubbled into cathode chamber with the flow rate of 30 sccm for 30 min to removal oxygen before NORR. Then, the low-concentration NO (1% v/v) was firstly washed by 4 M KOH and then fed at 30 sccm for 30 min to saturate the electrolyte, maintain a constant flow during the electrochemical tests. The electrocatalytic NORR measurements were conducted at different potentials for 1 h, and then the electrolyte was collected and analysed. For NORR tested in MEA, a piece of anion exchange membrane (AEM, Sustainion, thickness: 50 μm) was used to separate cathode and anode chambers. Before electrochemical test, the AEM was immersed in 1 M KOH for 12 h, then rinsed with deionized water, and finally stored in pure water. The RuO2 supported on nickel foam (RuO2/NF) as anode tested in 1 M KOH (30 mL, pH = 14), while PtNPs/FeSAC was used as the cathode for NORR and the tail gas was absorbed by 1 M HCl. The error bars were the mean values standard deviation according to the obtained data. All experiments were carried out at room temperature (≈25 °C).
Determination of NH3
The produced NH3 was quantified by the indophenol blue method49 and NMR. For indophenol blue method, standard NH3 solution with a series of concentrations were used to calibrated the concentration-absorbance curves. The fitting curve (y = 0.3435x + 0.05843, R2 = 0.9999) showed good linear relation of absorbance value with NH3 concentration. All electrolytes were diluted 10 times before testing unless otherwise specified. For 1H NMR measurements, the electrolyte after electrolysis was diluted 2 times with 1 M HCl to adjust the pH to acidic. Then, 100 mL DMSO-d6 was added in 500 μL acidified electrolyte.
Determination of FE and Yield of NH3
The FE for NH3 synthesis was calculated as the amount of electric charge used for NH3 production divided by the total charge passed through the electrodes during electrolysis. The total amount of NH3 produced was measured using colorimetric methods. The FE could be calculated as follows:
| 2 |
NH3 yield was calculated using the following equation:
| 3 |
where F is the Faraday constant (96485 C/mol), [NH3] is the measured NH3 concentration, V is the volume of the electrolyte in the cathodic chamber, Q is the total quantity of applied electricity, t is the reduction time, mcat. is the loaded mass of catalyst on carbon paper.
Determination of FE and yield of gas byproducts
The gas products (N2O, N2 and H2) were quantified on a Gas chromatography (GC 2014 SHIMADZU). The yield and FE of gas products were calculated according to the following equations:
| 4 |
| 5 |
Where rgas is the gas product formation rate, Pgas is the percentage of gas in the total gas flow detected by GC, Fgas is the flow rate of 1 vol% NO/Ar, mcat. is the loaded mass of catalyst on carbon paper, Vm is the molar volume in the standard condition (Vm = 22.4 L/mol), ngas is the electron transfer numbers of gas product, t is the reduction time, F is the Faraday constant (96485 C/mol), Q is the total quantity of applied electricity.
TOF calculations
We calculate the TOF according to the following equation:
| 6 |
Where Iproduct is partial current for NH3, n is number of electrons transferred for NH3, F is Faradaic constant, mcat. is catalyst mass in the electrode, α is mass ratio of active atoms in catalysts, Mmetal is atomic mass of metal.
Electrochemical in situ ATR-IR measurements
The in situ electrochemical ATR-IR measurements were conducted on a Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer with a liquid nitrogen-cooled MCT-A detector. The Si prism loaded with catalyst, Pt plate and Ag/AgCl were used as the working electrode, counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively, with 0.5 M K2SO4 as electrolyte. During the process of tests, 1 vol% NO was bubbled into the electrolyte with the flow rate of 10 sccm. Prior to testing, the Si prism was coated with Au film. The Si prism was first polished by 100 nm Al2O3. Next, the Si prism was soaked in a piranha solution for 30 min to removal organic contaminants. Then, the reflecting surface was immersed in a mixture of the Au plating solution (5.75 mM NaAuCl4·2H2O + 0.025 M NH4Cl + 0.075 M Na2SO3 + 0.025 M Na2S2O3 + 0.026 M NaOH) and a 2 wt % HF solution at 60 °C for 5 min. Afterward, the Au film was rinsed with deionized water and dried with N2. In situ ATR-IR spectra were collected at OCP and different applied potentials.
Electrochemical in situ XAS measurements
The in situ XAS measurements were conducted in the fluorescence mode using a home-made electrochemical cell. The PtNPs/FeSAC, Ag/AgCl and graphite rod were used as working electrode, reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. Prior to NORR test, 30 mL 0.5 M K2SO4 electrolyte was added into electrochemical cell and purged with Ar gas to removal dissolved oxygen. Subsequently, 1.0 vol% NO was bubbled through the deoxygenated electrolyte for 30 min to ensure saturation. Finally, the XAS spectra were recorded at OCP and different applied potentials.
Computation and model details
All spin-polarized simulations were carried out using density functional theory as implemented in the GPAW software50,51 version 19.8.1. The exchange-correlation effects were accounted for using the BEEF-vdW-functional, which combines the generalized gradient approximation with the Langreth-Lundqvist van der Waals-functional to achieve accurate adsorption energies. A 2 × 2 × 1 k-point mesh was used because it ensures energy convergence in the calculation (Supplementary Fig. 38). The vacuum layer thickness of 25 Å was employed in the modeling framework (Supplementary Fig. 39). Then, to model the solvent at the electrochemical interface, a hybrid implicit/explicit approach was employed in the vacuum layer, where 40 explicit water molecules surrounded the electrode surface, and the remaining water was modeled using the SCMVD52 dielectric continuum model. The positions and orientations of the explicit water molecules were optimized using the minima hopping global optimization method53 as implemented in ASE54. To simulate the nanoparticle environment, nine Pt atoms were introduced into the FeN4 structure.
To investigate NORR electrocatalytic processes involving proton-coupled electron transfer, free energy calculations were performed using the computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) approach. The chemical potential (the free energy per H) for H* + e was correlated with that of 1/2H255. The free energies of the reaction intermediates were defined as by ΔG = ΔE + ΔZPE – TΔS, where ΔE, ΔZPE, T, and ΔS represent the reaction energy, zero-point energy, temperature (298.15 K), and the entropy, respectively (Supplementary Table 5 and 6). The optimized computational models are provided in Supplementary Data 1.
Enhanced sampling
The slow growth sampling approach56,57 in the constrained molecular dynamics simulation method can be used to describe the kinetic energy barrier in the reaction process by setting a suitable collective variable (CV, ξ), which changes from state 1 to state 2 at a certain transformation rate . The work performed throughout the entire process from state 1 to state 2 can be calculated using the following formula:
| 7 |
Where V(q) represents the free energy, and is calculated using the SHAKE algorithm. When approaching the infinitesimal limit , the work required from state 1 to state 2 corresponds to the difference in free energy. In the SG sampling method, is selected to 0.0005 Å, and the final reaction’s free energy barrier can be obtained by aggregating the free energy distribution diagram.
Supplementary information
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
Source data
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52202214, 22072015, 21927811, and 22376222), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No. 2023NSFSC0954), China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (No. BX2021053), the Science and Technology lnnovation Program of Hunan Province (No. 2023RC1012), Central South University Research Program of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies (No. 2023QYJC012), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M700680). The authors thank BL11B beamline of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) for providing the XAFS beamtime. The numerical calculations in this paper have been done on Computing Center in Xi’an.
Author contributions
T.W. and X.G. conceived the idea, wrote the original draft, and collected and analyzed the data. X.G. and T.W. performed the DFT calculations and experiments. C.M. provided the HAADF-STEM characterization. M.L. supervised this project. All authors contributed and reviewed the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Xianbiao Fu, Rui-Ting Gao, Xin Wang and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
Full data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information, as well as from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper. The CIF files of computationally optimized structures are freely accessible on the website at https://github.com/sunyao-coder/Structures. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Xiaoxi Guo, Tongwei Wu.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-63365-7.
References
- 1.Buttignol, F. et al. Iron-catalysed cooperative redox mechanism for the simultaneous conversion of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide. Nat. Catal.7, 1305–1315 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ghosh, P. et al. Get to Know NO. Nat. Chem.16, 1382 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hwang, J. et al. Regulating oxygen activity of perovskites to promote NOx oxidation and reduction kinetics. Nat. Catal.4, 663–673 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anenberg, S. et al. Impacts and mitigation of excess diesel-related NOx emissions in 11 major vehicle markets. Nature545, 467–471 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Han, L. et al. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 by using novel catalysts: state of the art and future prospects. Chem. Rev.119, 10916–10976 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He, G. et al. Polymeric vanadyl species determine the low-temperature activity of V-based catalysts for the SCR of NOx with NH3. Sci. Adv.4, eaau4637 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gevers, L. et al. Unraveling the structure and role of Mn and Ce for NOx reduction in application-relevant catalysts. Nat. Commun.13, 2960 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Inomata, Y. et al. Bulk tungsten-substituted vanadium oxide for low-temperature NOx removal in the presence of water. Nat. Commun.12, 557 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marberger, A. et al. VOx surface coverage optimization of V2O5/WO3-TiO2 SCR catalysts by variation of the V loading and by aging. Catalysts5, 1704–1720 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kwak, J. H. et al. Excellent activity and selectivity of Cu-SSZ-13 in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. J. Catal.275, 187–190 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shao, J. et al. Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia from nitric oxide using a copper–tin alloy catalyst. Nat. Energy8, 1273–1283 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liang, J. et al. Amorphous boron carbide on titanium dioxide nanobelt arrays for high-efficiency electrocatalytic NO reduction to NH3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202202087 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang, L. et al. High-performance electrochemical NO reduction into NH3 by MoS2 nanosheet. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 25263–25268 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.John, J. et al. The why and how of NOx electroreduction to ammonia. Nat. Catal.6, 1125–1130 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Salmon, N. et al. Offshore green ammonia synthesis. Nat. Synth.2, 604–611 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gao, R. et al. Photoelectrochemical production of disinfectants from seawater. Nat. Sustain.8, 672–681 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gao, R. et al. Ru-P pair sites boost charge transport in hematite photoanodes for exceeding 1% efficient solar water splitting. PNAS120, e2300493120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gao, R. et al. Dynamic semiconductor-electrolyte interface for sustainable solar water splitting over 600 hours under neutral conditions. Sci. Adv.9, eade4589 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang, D. et al. Hexagonal cobalt nanosheets for high-performance electrocatalytic NO reduction to NH3. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 6899–6904 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu, Z. et al. Cu@Co with dilatation strain for high-performance electrocatalytic reduction of low-concentration nitric oxide. Adv. Mater.36, 2309470 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li, Y. et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of low-concentration nitric oxide into ammonia over Ru nanosheets. ACS Energy Lett.7, 1187–1194 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guo, X. et al. Aqueous electroreduction of nitric oxide to ammonia at low concentration via vacancy engineered FeOCl. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202318792 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guo, X. et al. Enhancing low-concentration electroreduction of NO to NH3 via potential-controlled active site-intermediate interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202420346 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang, D. et al. Ru-incorporation-induced phase transition in Co nanoparticles for low-concentration nitric oxide electroreduction to ammonia at low potential. Adv. Mater.36, 2408580 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang, D. et al. Oxygen-bridged copper-iron atomic pair as dual-metal active sites for boosting electrocatalytic NO reduction. Adv. Mater.35, 2304646 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liang, J. et al. Coupling denitrification and ammonia synthesis via selective electrochemical reduction of nitric oxide over Fe2O3 nanorods. J. Mater. Chem. A10, 6454 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu, T. et al. Greatly improving electrochemical N2 reduction over TiO2 nanoparticles by iron doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 18449–18453 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kang, W. et al. Structural evidence for a dynamic metallocofactor during N2 reduction by Mo-nitrogenase. Science368, 1381 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang, C. et al. Advanced noble-metal/transition-metal/metal-free electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction in water-electrolysis for hydrogen production. Coord. Chem. Rev.514, 215899 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gao, R. et al. Single-atomic-site platinum steers photogenerated charge carrier lifetime of hematite nanoflakes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat. Commun.14, 2640 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li, J. et al. Identification of durable and non-durable FeNx sites in Fe–N–C materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal.4, 10–19 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spivey, T. D. et al. Selective Interactions between free-atom-like d-States in single-atom alloy catalysts and near-frontier molecular orbitals. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 11897–11902 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wan, X. et al. Iron atom–cluster interactions increase activity and improve durability in Fe–N–C fuel cells. Nat. Commun.13, 2963 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xian, J. et al. Electrocatalytic synthesis of essential amino acids from nitric oxide using atomically dispersed Fe on N-doped carbon. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.62, e202304007 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nie, N. et al. Superfast synthesis of densely packed and ultrafine Pt-lanthanide@KB via solvent-free microwave as efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. Small17, 2102879 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gao, X. et al. Mechanism of particle-mediated inhibition of demetalation for single-atom catalytic sites in acidic electrochemical environments. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 15528–15537 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim, D. et al. Selective electrochemical reduction of nitric oxide to hydroxylamine by atomically dispersed iron catalyst. Nat. Commun.12, 1856 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yao, Y. et al. Electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction on ruthenium. ACS Energy Lett.4, 1336–1341 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fang, J. et al. Ampere-level current density ammonia electrochemical synthesis using CuCo nanosheets simulating nitrite reductase bifunctional nature. Nat. Commun.13, 7899 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li, J. et al. Efficient ammonia electrosynthesis from nitrate on strained ruthenium nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 7036–7046 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang, Y. et al. Phase-regulated active hydrogen behavior on molybdenum disulfide for electrochemical nitrate-to-ammonia conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202315109 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen, X. et al. Demystify the unique hydrogen spillover effect in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Green. Chem.27, 4959 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Feng, Y. et al. Electronic metal-support interaction induces hydrogen spillover and platinum utilization in hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202413417 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhou, J. et al. Linear adsorption enables NO selective electroreduction to hydroxylamine on single Co sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.62, e202305184 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Han, S. et al. Ultralow overpotential nitrate reduction to ammonia via a three-step relay mechanism. Nat. Catal.6, 402–414 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen, K. et al. Self-tandem electrocatalytic NO reduction to NH3 on a W single-atom catalyst. Nano Lett.23, 1735–1742 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cheon, S. et al. Electro-synthesis of ammonia from dilute nitric oxide on a gas diffusion electrode. ACS Energy Lett.7, 958–965 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li, M. et al. A pair‑electrosynthesis for formate at ultra‑low voltage via coupling of CO2 reduction and formaldehyde oxidation. Nano-Micro Lett.14, 211 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhu, D. et al. Photo-illuminated diamond as a solid-state source of solvated electrons in water for nitrogen reduction. Nat. Mater.12, 836–841 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mortensen, J. J. et al. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B71, 035109 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Enkovaara, J. et al. Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter22, 253202 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Held, A. et al. Simplified continuum solvent model with a smooth cavity based on volumetric Data. J. Chem. Phys.141, 174108 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Peterson, A. A. Global optimization of adsorbate-surface structures while preserving molecular identity. Top. Catal.57, 40–53 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Larsen, A. H. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter29, 273002 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Norskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B108, 17886–17892 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Woo, T. K. et al. A combined car−Parrinello QM/MM implementation for Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of extended systems: application to transition metal catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. B101, 7877–7880 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jarzynski, C. et al. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2690–2693 (1997). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
Data Availability Statement
Full data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information, as well as from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper. The CIF files of computationally optimized structures are freely accessible on the website at https://github.com/sunyao-coder/Structures. Source data are provided with this paper.





