ABSTRACT
Chronic non‐point nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) loads reshape sediment microbial biogeochemical cycling in headwater systems, altering ecosystem function. This study integrates DNA and RNA amplicon sequencing with metatranscriptomics to examine microbial taxonomic and functional responses to nutrient inputs in lower Great Lakes watersheds, focusing on N, P, and sulphur (S) metabolism. RNA‐based taxa showed a stronger correlation with metabolic functions than DNA‐based taxa, highlighting RNA‐based approaches as valuable tools for assessing active microbial responses to nutrients. Site‐specific analyses revealed distinct microbial metabolic profiles linked to watershed fertiliser sources and seasonal variation. Inorganic fertiliser inputs were associated with tightly coupled N reduction and sulphur oxidation, driven by differential expression of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA) and sox genes. In contrast, a manure‐amended site exhibited elevated nitrosative stress and sulphur assimilation pathways, consistent with detection of ammonia‐oxidising genera. The low‐impact reference site demonstrated intermediate functional turnover, enhanced nitrogen fixation, and the highest microbial diversity, suggesting greater ecosystem resilience. Seasonally, functional turnover increased in fall, with fewer shared core taxa across sites compared to summer. These findings highlight the impact of chronic nutrient enrichment on site‐specific microbial adaptations and underscore the importance of temporal dynamics in assessing freshwater sediment microbial communities.
Keywords: agriculture, DNA vs. RNA , Great Lakes watersheds, metatranscriptomics, nitrogen, phosphorus, sediments
Excess loads of nitrogen and phosphorus in agriculturally impacted watersheds alter microbial metabolism in sediments. A multi‐omic investigation found nitrate reduction coupled to sulphur oxidation was prominent where inorganic fertilisers were dominant, whilst a manure‐impacted site revealed biomarkers of nitrosative stress due to incomplete microbial elimination of reactive nitrogen species.

1. Introduction
Nutrient runoff from agricultural landscapes is recognised as a leading cause of degraded river water quality worldwide (Newcomer Johnson et al. 2016). Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) sourced from both inorganic (i.e., chemical‐based) and organic (i.e., manure‐based) fertilisers can impair surface waters and sediments and lead to eutrophication, anoxia, and disruption of ecosystem services (Jenny et al. 2020; Le Moal et al. 2018). Watersheds of the lower Great Lakes of North America face these non‐point nutrient threats due to the multiple and combining pressures from intensive row crop agriculture and livestock operations in the region (Singh et al. 2023). Assessment and prediction of N and P transformations in these systems are vital to effectively combat the detrimental effects of nutrients on receiving waterbodies (Kelly et al. 2021; Stutter et al. 2021).
Microbial communities in river sediments are paramount in the biogeochemical cycling of N and P and are vital to ecosystem balance. Denitrifying bacteria remove excess N from aquatic systems through the conversion of nitrate (NO3 −) and nitrite (NO2 −) to N2 gas, whilst dissimilatory nitrate reducers and nitrifying bacteria cycle and retain N in the form of ammonia (NH3), which can be utilised by other organisms (Huang et al. 2018). In addition, N‐fixation is microbially mediated and necessary for the assimilation and biosynthesis of multiple life‐sustaining compounds in N‐limited systems. P is essential to many microbial processes and is a vital component of nucleic acids, membranes, and ATP. Thus, P is often considered the limiting nutrient for primary production in impacted aquatic systems (Records et al. 2016). Microbes can uptake and store P in large quantities in conditions of limitation (McMahon and Read 2013; Sanz‐Luque et al. 2020), and gene‐level control of these transformations is informative in P cycling and transport modelling. Sulphur (S) is another principal biological macronutrient, with sulphate (SO4 2−) serving as a microbial terminal electron acceptor in oxygen and nitrate‐deficient sediments and is coupled with the bioavailability of P and iron (Fe) (Lamers et al. 2012) and linked to N‐reduction (Li et al. 2022). Characterising the diversity and function of sediment microbial communities is thus central to the understanding of nutrient transformations and fate in agriculturally impacted environments where N and P are in excess of natural background concentrations (Horton et al. 2019).
Culture‐independent genomic techniques that sequence DNA and RNA from sediment samples can inform on the variety of microbes present (through 16S ribosomal amplicon sequencing, for example) and the genes responsible for macronutrient reactions (through shotgun sequencing of total extractable nucleic acids) (Febria et al. 2010; Gibbons et al. 2014; Jewell et al. 2016; Zemskaya et al. 2021). However, a limited number of studies have sought to combine amplicon and shotgun approaches to find consensus in microbial roles in nutrient‐stressed freshwater environments. Metatranscriptomics and amplicon sequencing of microbial communities in marine sediments have identified site‐specific and temporal trends in nitrogen cycling, revealing Nitrosopumilus as an active nitrifier where N and organic carbon inputs were high (Marshall et al. 2021, 2023). Elsewhere, taxonomic analysis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and functional analysis of messenger RNA (mRNA) were used to examine planktonic microorganisms across European lakes with varying phosphate levels. The findings suggest that whilst taxon diversity differed between lakes, leading to distinct ecological roles, core functions remained consistent (Grossmann et al. 2016). Multiple studies have also highlighted the significance of measuring both DNA‐based and RNA‐based taxonomy to assess the total and active microbial communities present, respectively, citing that RNA‐based methods may better represent the functionally relevant microbial guilds (Broman et al. 2021; Goltsman et al. 2015; Jia et al. 2020; Loeppmann et al. 2018; Meyer et al. 2019). Although metatranscriptomic analysis can incorporate taxonomic identification, the common practise of depleting rRNA from samples (to increase the % yield of mRNA) as well as the lack of specific functional gene‐to‐taxa databases of freshwater‐derived microorganisms results in a low taxonomic resolution from mRNA alone in these study systems. Thus, using and co‐interpreting taxonomic and functional methods enables an improved view of microbial community diversity and function in aquatic systems and can reveal more relevant taxa/genes corresponding to sediment nutrient cycling. Yet there is a lack of such applications to non‐point source nutrient‐affected headwaters.
Building on this established knowledge of microbially driven nutrient cycling and omic analyses, we propose several hypotheses:
RNA‐based taxa datasets will correlate more strongly with metatranscriptomic datasets than DNA‐based taxa, as RNA better represents functionally active species.
Agriculturally impacted sites will differ from reference sites both spatially and temporally in microbial community structure and function.
Agriculturally impacted sites will exhibit lower microbial gene expression related to phosphorus uptake and higher expression of genes for nitrogen removal (e.g., denitrification) driven by fertiliser‐enriched nutrient availability, compared to reference sites.
Nitrogen fixation will be more pronounced at low‐impact reference sites, where bioavailable nutrients are not oversupplied by fertiliser runoff.
To test these hypotheses, we co‐extracted DNA and RNA from sediments in three Great Lakes headwaters influenced by distinct non‐point nutrient sources: chemical fertiliser amendment, manure fertiliser amendment, and a low‐impact reference site, sampled across two seasons (summer and fall). 16S amplicon sequencing of both DNA and RNA was conducted to distinguish total versus active microbial taxa, followed by RNA‐seq metatranscriptomics to assess functional genes associated with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulphur (S) metabolism. Comparative analyses examined whether DNA‐based or RNA‐based amplicon data correlated more strongly with nutrient‐cycling genes. We then identified the most active and abundant taxa and analysed differentially expressed functional genes across sites to build an understanding of microbial responses to specific nutrient impacts.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Sampling Locations
Three river segments in southern Ontario (Canada) were sampled in the summer and fall of 2020; Big Creek (BC), Nissouri Creek (NC), and the Saugeen River (SR). Watercourses were selected based on the prevailing watershed agricultural practise. In brief, BC and NC are within agricultural catchments (> 70% agricultural landcover), with BC characterised by inorganic fertiliser application and NC characterised by a manure/inorganic fertiliser mix (Table S1), whilst the SR site is in a higher forested catchment (< 35% agricultural landcover) representing a pseudo‐natural reference site to contrast against the other two sites. BC and NC are headwaters of the Thames River, which is a major accumulator and transporter of nutrients to Lake St. Clair and the Detroit River of the Great Lakes Huron–Erie Corridor system (Bocaniov et al. 2019). The SR sampling site is within an upstream region of the river ~140 km from its outlet to Lake Huron and serves as a low nutrient‐impact system.
The region has a humid continental climate with cold, snowy winters, mild autumns, and warm, humid summers. Average daily summer temperatures are 21.9°C, 19.6°C, and 17.8°C at BC, NC, and SR, respectively, whilst fall averages are 11.9°C, 10.1°C, and 9.4°C. Rainfall patterns differ slightly amongst sites: BC receives most precipitation in May–June (mean total 86 mm), whereas NC and SR peak in August–September with 92 mm and 70 mm, respectively. Summer and fall rainfall during the study period was consistent with long‐term averages (Government of Canada 2022).
Sampling dates were chosen to avoid rainfall effects on stream dynamics. Specifically, rainfall in the 2 days prior to sampling remained within one standard deviation of the seasonal mean (summer: June 1–August 30; fall: September 1–November 30). This ensured stream conditions reflected typical seasonal patterns rather than being influenced by runoff or dilution from heavy rainfall events.
2.2. Bed Sediment and Surface Water Sampling
Bed sediment was collected in triplicate at each site with a sterile trowel to shovel sediment into sterile, wide mouth high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) containers. Sediment was collected at the sediment–water interface (SWI) to limit exposure to the overlying water column. From each triplicate HDPE container, smaller sediment subsamples of 4–5 g were transferred into cryotubes in the field using sterilised spatulas and immediately flash‐frozen in liquid nitrogen in a 4 L field dewar. Cryotubes were filled to 3/4 to avoid rupturing when flash freezing. Sites were wadable and did not exceed 0.7 m in depth.
Surface water for assessing nutrient levels was collected in triplicate from the midsection of each watercourse segment in 250 mL HDPE bottles at a depth of 20 cm below the surface. Water was filtered in the field through 0.22 μm cellulose‐acetate filters for dissolved analytes. Water samples were kept on ice until storage at −4°C until analysis (up to 1 week). General water quality parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH) were recorded via a YSI EXO2 Multiparameter Water Quality Sonde. For nutrient analytes, N chemistry (NO3 (nitrate‐nitrogen), NO2 (nitrite‐nitrogen), NH4, Total Organic Nitrogen (TON)), P chemistry (soluble reactive P (SRP), Total P (TP)), and SO4 were measured on a Thermo Gallery Plus Beermaster Autoanalyser, with Total N (TN) measured on a Shimadzu TOC‐L/TNM‐L CPH Model Analyser according to EPA standards. Analyses were performed at the University of Alberta's Natural Resources Analytical Laboratory (NRAL).
2.3. DNA and RNA Amplicon Sequencing for Microbial Taxonomic Analysis
2.3.1. Extraction and Sequencing
Sediment samples were co‐extracted for total RNA and DNA using the RNeasy PowerSoil Total RNA (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and RNeasy PowerSoil DNA Elution Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Bed sediments were processed per the manufacturer's instructions using 2 g of thawed sediment per extraction. An aliquot of the total RNA fraction was DNA‐depleted using the RapidOut DNA Removal Kit (Thermo Scientific) and converted to copy DNA (cDNA) using the High‐Capacity RNA‐to‐cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States). All DNA and cDNA samples were subjected to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to amplify an approx. 300 base pair (bp) segment of the hypervariable 16S prokaryote rRNA gene. Forward primer V5F (5′‐ATTAGATACCCNGGTAG‐3′) and reverse primer V6R (5′‐CGACAGAGCCATGCANCACCT‐3′) were used in the PCR reaction with 1 μL of DNA or cDNA, with additional reagents and reaction parameters specified previously (Falk et al. 2022). Resulting amplicons were visualised on 1% agarose gels to confirm sequence length, followed by a modified bead cleaning based on the Agencourt AMPure XP PCR purification protocol to remove fragments < 50 base pairs. A second PCR was performed to attach unique barcode and adapter nucleotides to each sample for sequencing in multiplex. Samples were then combined and excised through a final 2% agarose gel extraction (QI‐Aquick Gel Extraction KitTM, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), normalised for concentration on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, and sequenced on the University of Windsor's Ion GeneStudio S5 Sequencer (ThermoFisher, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) with output in single‐end FASTQ file format. A total of 48 sediment samples were sequenced, with demultiplexed raw data submitted to the Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA927737 (Table S2).
2.3.2. 16S Microbial Community Profiling
DNA‐ and RNA‐based sample FASTQ files were processed through the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline, QIIME2 ver. 2021.4. After filtering (Callahan et al. 2016) and alignment (Katoh et al. 2002), samples were rarefied to 10,000 sequences for beta diversity pairwise comparisons using the q2‐phylogeny plugin (Faith 1991; Lozupone et al. 2007; Lozupone and Knight 2005). Microbial taxonomy was assigned to amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using the SILVA ribosomal RNA database (Silva release 132_99_16S) (Quast et al. 2013) with a Naive Bayes classifier (Bokulich et al. 2018) trained on sequences extracted using the primers specified. The resulting hierarchical taxonomy‐by‐sample table was used for microbial community analysis and visualisation, with analysis done at the genus level.
2.4. mRNA Sequencing and Metatranscriptomics
Bed sediment samples were analysed for total prokaryotic gene function via mRNA metatranscriptomics. After extraction, as described in Section 2.3.1, aliquots of RNA were checked for purity and quantity on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and sent to the Centre d'expertise et de services Génome Québec (https://cesgq.com/home) for bacterial rRNA depletion (Ribo‐Zero rRNA removal kit), reverse transcription to cDNA, library preparation, and shotgun sequencing on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System (Montréal (Québec), Canada). Sequence reads were processed through the MG‐RAST (Metagenomics Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology) pipeline (Meyer et al. 2008). Details of preprocessing, dereplication, and gene calling can be found in Keegan et al. (2016). Briefly, clustering of proteins was performed at 90% similarity using uclust (Edgar 2010), with protein identification and annotation mapping done via sBLAT and using the M5NR database. Annotations were selected using the ‘Representative Hit’, classification, with functional profiles of feature hits across samples produced using the hierarchical SEED Subsystems classification (Overbeek et al. 2014). Subsystems uses a four‐level hierarchy organisation, with functional prediction increasing in specificity as levels increase. The highest level (L1) represents a broad functional category containing many features surrounding a central cellular process, whilst the lowest level (L4, or ‘function‐level’) produces a functional assignment (often a protein‐coding gene) specific to a single reaction. Detailed site and seasonal analysis were restricted to functions within the L1 categories ‘Nitrogen Metabolism’, ‘Phosphorus Metabolism’, and ‘Sulphur Metabolism’. A total of 16 sediment samples were produced, with metatranscriptomic libraries available through MG‐RAST under the IDs outlined in Table S3.
2.5. Microbial Community and Functional Analysis
2.5.1. Mantel Tests of Microbial Taxonomy (DNA and RNA) vs. Function
DNA‐ and RNA‐based taxa‐by‐sample count tables at the genus level were compared to the N, P, and S metatranscriptomic L4 function‐by‐sample count table via mantel tests to assess the degree of correlation of the total (DNA) and active (RNA) microbial community composition to microbial community nutrient cycling functions. As the mantel test required matching sample numbers between matrices, the amplicon dataset (n = 48 samples) was first reduced by random exclusion of samples to match the sample numbers in the metatranscriptomics dataset (n = 16). The count tables were then normalised by cumulative sum scaling (CSS) (Paulson and Bravo 2013), converted to distance matrices using Euclidean distance, and subjected to a mantel test (R vegan package) using the Spearman correlation method with r 2 and p‐values calculated. Mantel test results indicated a stronger correlation between RNA‐based taxa and N, P, and S functions (r 2 = 0.596, p = 0.001) than DNA‐based taxa to N, P, and S functions (r 2 = 0.288, p = 0.011) (Figure 1); thus, RNA‐based taxa were weighted more strongly in additional analysis of core active taxa (Section 2.5.2).
FIGURE 1.

Mantel test results comparing sample distances between16S amplicon taxonomy and Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Sulphur (S) metabolism functions. (A) DNA‐based 16S amplicon data vs. functions, (B) RNA‐based 16S amplicon data vs. functions. Points represent the comparison of Euclidean distances between paired amplicon samples (x‐axis values) and paired metatranscriptomic samples (y‐axis values).
2.5.2. Methodology for Identification of Core–Active Taxa
The core‐active taxa for each sampling time and site were identified by leveraging presence/absence, significance in RNA‐amplicon data via Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size Estimation (LEfSe) (Segata et al. 2011), and overall relative abundance. In brief, genus count tables were first filtered for taxa detected in both DNA and RNA (i.e., a count of at least 1 in each dataset) as a conservative measure of presence in samples, and then LEfSe was used to sort the taxa by their significance in RNA over DNA (p < 0.05) as RNA‐based taxa showed a stronger correlation to nutrient cycling functions (Section 2.5.1). These significant taxa were then ranked, highest to lowest, by their average abundance in RNA and DNA. These were rendered as the core‐active taxa, as they were detected in both amplicon datasets, but with greater detection from RNA and were highly abundant.
2.5.3. Site and Season Differential Microbial Function Within Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sulphur Metabolism
The functions of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulphur (S) subsystems were pairwise compared across season (within site) and pairwise by location (between site by season) by differential expression analysis using DESeq2 (Love et al. 2014). The identified differential functions were then tallied into their L3 subsystem categories for visualisation and organisation. For three‐way site comparisons of functions in summer and fall, the differentially expressed functions as identified by DESeq2 were further analysed by LEfSe and presented within their detailed pathways of N, P, and S metabolism. This additional analysis presents the most contrasting functions between sites, as normalised across the three groups. DESeq2 and LEfSe results are summarised in Tables S3–S7.
2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on selected sediment samples. Collected sediment was kept at 4°C after collection and visualised the following day. Sediment was adhered to microscope stubs with carbon tape and allowed to air for 1 h and then examined using a FEI Quanta 200F ESEM under low vacuum at ranges of 5–17 kV.
3. Results
3.1. Nutrient Loads Across Sites
Water quality parameters across sites for summer and fall 2020 are displayed in Table 1. Total Nitrogen (TN) was higher at agricultural sites and greater in the summer than the fall, with Nissouri Creek (NC) defined by higher NO3 concentrations and Big Creek (BC) defined by higher NH4. Total phosphorus (TP) and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations were also higher at the agricultural sites, with BC exhibiting greater levels in the summer (0.16 and 0.05 mg L−1 for TP and SRP, respectively) and NC higher levels in the fall compared to summer (0.46 and 0.17 mg L−1). SO4 was higher in surface waters at the agriculturally impacted sites, and higher in summer than in fall.
TABLE 1.
Seasonal water quality parameters for Big Creek, Nissouri Creek, and the Saugeen River.
| Parameter | Season | Big creek (BC) | Nissouri creek (NC) | Saugeen river (SR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp (°C) | Summer | 26 (0.1) | 20.4 (0.2) | 24.0 (0) |
| Fall | 13.8 (0) | 10.1 (0) | 9.7 (0) | |
| pH | Summer | 8.1 (0.1) | 8.6 (0.1) | 8.5 (0) |
| Fall | 8.3 (0.01) | 8.8 (0.03) | 8.8 (0.03) | |
| DO (mg L−1) | Summer | 9.01 (0.03) | 10.46 (0.08) | 10.89 (0.05) |
| Fall | 10.55 (0.02) | 12.34 (0.03) | 11.39 (0.01) | |
| NO3 − (mg L−1) | Summer | 1.8 (0.14) | 4.65 (0.07) | 0.2 (0) |
| Fall | 0.35 (0.005) | 1.01 (0.004) | 0.23 (0.003) | |
| NO2 − (μg L−1) | Summer | bdl | bdl | bdl |
| Fall | 3.1 (0.19) | 1.5 (0.3) | 0.9 (0.05) | |
| NH4 + (μg L−1) | Summer | 130 (0) | 30 (0) | 20 (0) |
| Fall | 36.3 (14) | 16.4 (3) | 24.5 (3) | |
| TON (mg L−1) | Summer | 0.95 (0.07) | 0.3 (0) | 0.4 (0.14) |
| Fall | 0.35 (0.005) | 1.02 (0.004) | 0.23 (0.003) | |
| TN (mg L−1) | Summer | 2.75 (0.21) | 4.95 (0.07) | 0.6 (0.14) |
| Fall | 0.94 (0.02) | 1.21 (0.02) | 0.62 (0.01) | |
| SRP (mg L−1) | Summer | 0.05 (0.004) | 0.02 (0.004) | 0.007 (0.005) |
| Fall | 0.08 (0.0006) | 0.17 (0.004) | 0.02 (0.004) | |
| TP (mg L−1) | Summer | 0.16 (0.01) | 0.06 (0) | 0.005 (0) |
| Fall | 0.19 | 0.46 | 0.05 | |
| SO4 2− (mg L−1) | Summer | 32 (0) | 30 (0) | 5 (0) |
| Fall | 19.4 (0.2) | 8.4 (0) | 1.7 (0) |
Note: Brackets represent standard deviations.
Abbreviations: bdl, below detection limit; DO, dissolved oxygen; NH4 +, ammonium‐nitrogen; NO2 −, nitrite‐nitrogen; NO3 −, nitrate‐nitrogen; SRP, soluble reactive phosphorus; TN, total nitrogen; TON, total organic nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
3.2. Taxa Correlations and Core‐Active Taxa
Mantel test results showed a stronger correlation of RNA‐based taxa to N, P, and S metabolism functions (Methods Section 2.5.1, Figure 1). Thus, RNA‐based taxa were weighted more strongly in additional analysis of core‐active taxa (Methods Section 2.5.2).
For core‐active taxa, 34 genera were identified at BC (15 in Summer, 19 in Fall), 55 at NC (20 in Summer, 35 in Fall), and 68 at SR (41 in Summer, 27 in Fall). The top 15 most abundant core‐active taxa for each site are displayed in Figure 2 by season and by detected abundance in both DNA and RNA. BC was most abundant in Aquabacterium, Thiobacillus, Sulfuritalea, OLB12, and Rhizobacter; NC in Flavobacterium, OLB12, Sulfuritalea, Dechloromonas, and Geobacter; and SR in Sulfuritalea, Sideroxydans, OLB12, Ferritrophicum, and Flavobacterium. Across the three sites, the shared core‐active taxa in Summer were Aquabacterium, OLB12, Rhizobacter, Sulfuritalea, Sideroxydans, and Chryseolinea, and in Fall were Dechloromonas, Leptothrix, and Candidatus Accumulibacter.
FIGURE 2.

The top 15 core‐active genera by relative abundance (%) across sites identified by leveraging DNA‐based and RNA‐based amplicon sequencing data.
3.3. Metatranscriptomic Overview and Spatial and Temporal Expression in N, P, and S Metabolism
Figure 3 shows a heatmap of Level 1 functional categories across sample groups. Samples clustered primarily by season, with Nitrogen Metabolism and Sulphur Metabolism subsystems clustered closely together, and Phosphorus Metabolism more separated.
FIGURE 3.

Heatmap of level 1 subsystem pathway expression across site and season.
Seasonal differences in N, P, and S functions within sites are summarised in Figure 4 and Table S6. NC exhibited the greatest number and variety of differentially expressed functions between summer and fall (n = 61), with the majority of turnover within Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia (DNRA), Sulphur Reduction, and Denitrification. SR differentially expressed functions were the next greatest (n = 34), whilst BC exhibited fewer seasonal differences (n = 21), with the most functional turnover within Sulphur Oxidation.
FIGURE 4.

Summary of differences in N, P, and S pathways for summer and fall within sites. (A) Inorganic fertiliser‐impacted site (Big Creek), (B) manure fertiliser‐impacted site (Nissouri Creek), (C) low impact reference site (Saugeen River). (D) conceptual diagram representing the functional differences between sites and seasons. Values represent the number of differentially expressed functions between each group, reflected in the distance between groups.
Pairwise site differences in N, P, and S functions are summarised for summer and fall in Figures 5 and 6, respectively (complete data in Tables S4 and S5). For summer, BC vs. NC showed the greatest number of differentially expressed functions (n = 16) compared to BC vs. SR (n = 11) and NC vs. SR (n = 10). Genes within Sulphur Oxidation accounted for the greatest number of differentially expressed functions (n = 8) between sites, followed by Inorganic Sulphur Assimilation and Sulphur Reduction. For fall, there were more differentially expressed functions between sites, led again by BC vs. NC (n = 36), then BC vs. SR (n = 25), and NC vs. SR (n = 8). There was also a greater variety of genes differentially expressed in the fall, led by functions within Phosphate/Phosphonate Metabolism and DNRA.
FIGURE 5.

Summer pairwise differential expression of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Sulphur functions between sites. (A) Inorganic vs. manure, (B) inorganic vs. reference, (C) manure vs. reference. (D) Tally of differentially expressed functions by pathway between all sites in summer.
FIGURE 6.

Fall pairwise differential expression of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulphur functions between sites. (A) Inorganic vs. manure, (B) inorganic vs. reference, (C) manure vs. reference. (D) Tally of differentially expressed functions by pathway between all sites in fall.
Site‐specific functional gene differences for N, P, and S metabolism are explored further by their higher subsystem pathways in Figures 7 and 8 for summer and fall, respectively, and detailed below (complete data in Tables S7 and S8).
FIGURE 7.

Summer differentially expressed genes within phosphorus, nitrogen, and sulphur metabolism across Big Creek (BC) Nissouri Creek (NC) and Saugeen River (SR) bed sediments. Level 3 subsystem pathway categories are denoted by brackets for phosphorus and sulphur genes. Nitrogen level 3 pathways of denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA), nitrosative stress, N‐fixation, and Ammonia Assimilation/Oxidation are denoted in the N‐cycling pathway diagram. The scale bar represents normalised expression calculated from LEfSe analysis.
FIGURE 8.

Fall differentially expressed genes within Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Sulphur metabolism across Big Creek (BC), Nissouri Creek (NC), and Saugeen River (SR) bed sediments. Level 3 subsystem pathway categories are denoted by brackets for phosphorus and sulphur genes. Nitrogen level 3 pathways of denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA), nitrosative stress, N‐fixation, and ammonia assimilation/oxidation are denoted in the N‐cycling pathway diagram. The scale bar represents normalised expression calculated from LEfSe analysis.
3.3.1. Summer Functional Trends
Within Nitrogen Metabolism, BC and SR exhibited significantly greater expression of a membrane‐bound nitrate reductase (narH) alpha chain gene involved in the microbial conversion of nitrate to nitrite, as well as greater expression of a periplasmic nitrate reductase (napA), both operating within DNRA. A Ferredoxin 3 gene and hydroxylamine reductase (hao) classified under Nitrosative Stress were significantly more abundant at NC, with hao also expressed more at BC than the SR. Nitrous‐oxide reductase (nosZ) involved in the final step of denitrification showed greater abundance at BC and SR over NC, and a Cu‐containing nitrite reductase (nirK) had greater expression at SR. For P‐metabolism, a pyrophosphate‐energised proton pump gene (hppA) was highly expressed across sites and seasons, but significantly more abundant at NC, and a phosphate ABC transporter periplasmic phosphate‐binding protein (PstS) showed higher abundance at BC. For S‐metabolism genes, a set of sulphur‐oxidation and reduction genes showed greater abundance at BC than both NC and SR (SoxA, SoxB, molybdopterin C, SoxX, SoxZ, SoxD, SoxY, glutamate synthase (with sulphite), and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase). Sulphate adenyltransferase (dissimilatory‐type) and adenylsulfate reductase (alpha‐subunit) were highly expressed across all 3 sites, but greatest at NC.
3.3.2. Fall Functional Trends
Fall sediments showed more inter‐site functional differences than summer. DNRA was the main pathway showing differences within Nitrogen Metabolism functions, with narH (beta chain) and napA exhibiting greater expression at BC, and a nitrate ABC transporter and nitrite reductase nir (large subunit, nirB) being expressed higher at NC and SR. Under Nitrosative Stress, hao, which is also involved in ammonia transformations, was highly expressed across all sediments, but lowest at Nissouri Creek. Ferredoxin 3 was lower expressed at NC than BC and SR. The Denitrification pathway showed a higher abundance of nosZ at BC and SR and also shifts in nirK and a nitric‐oxide reductase (norB, quinol‐dependent), which were most expressed at BC and SR, respectively. Differentially expressed genes involved in Ammonia Assimilation/Oxidation included a glutamate‐ammonia‐ligase adenylyltransferase (glnE), nitrogen regulation protein NR(l), and an ammonium transporter, all of which showed greater abundance at NC and SR than BC. The N‐fixation pathway showed a similar trend to Ammonia Assimilation/Oxidation: nifE, nifA, and nifB all had higher expression at NC and SR and less expression at BC.
For Phosphorus Metabolism, two primary pathways comprised differences between sites: Phosphate/Phosphonate Metabolism and P‐uptake and Transport. Within Phosphate/Phosphonate Metabolism, hppa was again highly expressed across sites, but most abundant at BC, with a similar trend for an inorganic pyrophosphatase (PPase) and an NAD(P) transhydrogenase alpha subunit. A Mn‐dependent PPase and a low‐affinity inorganic phosphate transporter were higher expressed at BC and NC. An exopolyphosphatase and 2‐aminoethylphosphonate:pyruvate aminotransferase (phnW) were more expressed at NC and SR, and less expressed at BC. Within P‐uptake and Transport, all significant genes were in higher abundance at NC and the SR, with lower expression at BC. This included Pst group genes involved in P‐uptake and a phosphate regulon sensor (SphS) and phosphate transport permeases (PstA, PstC) involved in the high affinity phosphate (PHO) transporter regulon.
For Sulphur Metabolism, fewer genes involving sulphur‐oxidation/reduction were differentially expressed across sediments than in the summer. SoxY, a sulphide dehydrogenase, DsrK, and a glutamate synthase [NADPH] were all more expressed at BC than NC, with intermediate expression at SR. Within Inorganic Sulphur Assimilation, sulphate adenyltransferase (dissimilatory‐type) and adenylsulfate reductase (alpha‐subunit) were again highly expressed across all sites, but greatest abundance was measured at BC opposed to NC as seen in the summer. However, a putative sulphate permease showed higher abundance at NC and SR. The remaining S function genes were spread across ‘Glutathione Utilisation’, ‘Taurine Utilisation’, ‘Thioredoxin‐disulphide Reductase’, and ‘Alkanesulfonate Assimilation’, and were mostly higher expressed at NC and the SR and in low abundance at BC. The exception was alkyl hydroperoxide reductase F and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase C, which were higher expressed at BC and the SR.
4. Discussion
Headwater sediments impacted by chronic non‐point nutrient pollution from agriculture may have altered microbial biogeochemical cycling compared to non‐impacted reference sites. To contrast these, DNA‐ and RNA‐based approaches were used to leverage the whole and active microbial consortium, respectively, and were layered with metatranscriptomic analysis with a focus on N, P, and S metabolism functions.
4.1. RNA‐Based Taxa Align With Nutrient Cycling Functions
From Mantel tests, RNA‐derived taxa showed a stronger correlation to N, P, and S functions than DNA‐derived taxa, supporting our hypothesis. In other words, paired RNA amplicon samples that exhibited dissimilarity or similarity in community composition also showed dissimilarity/similarity in the functional metatranscriptomic dataset. Alternatively, DNA‐based amplicon sequencing showed a weaker connection, where paired samples could be similar in their DNA‐based taxa composition but dissimilar in function, and vice versa. Previous studies have reported differences in DNA‐based and RNA‐based amplicon sequenced microbial communities (De Vrieze et al. 2018; Pochon et al. 2017), but this is the first study to our knowledge to quantify the community similarity to a subset of paired functional data via metatranscriptomics. This suggests that the utilisation of RNA for amplicon sequencing can be more adequate in assessing microbial taxonomic responses to nutrient loads, whereas DNA approaches may be more generic and thus less sensitive. This may partly explain why previous models have found weak linkages between denitrification rates and DNA‐based functional gene characteristics, with environmental characteristics being a better prediction of N‐cycling patterns (Attard et al. 2011; Graham et al. 2014). However, DNA‐based analyses are valuable in assessing holistic microbial functional potential and fundamental niches and are well suited for a variety of hypothesis testing, such as assessing the resilience of microbiomes over longer timeframes (Barnett and Shade 2024). The approach of weighing RNA more heavily in the identification of core‐active taxa across sites here, however, is supported by mantel test results and observations of how taxa aligned with site‐specific functions are expanded on below.
4.2. Seasonal and Site Divergence in Microbial Function by Agricultural Nutrient Inputs
Site water chemistry showed that the river segments within the agriculturally intensive watersheds, Big Creek (BC) and Nissouri Creek (NC), had higher nutrient concentrations than the less‐impacted control site, Saugeen River (SR). In addition, previous research showed total and bioavailable sediment P was significantly higher at BC and NC than SR (Falk et al. 2021), evidence that agricultural activity is associated with higher nutrient loads. Microbial taxonomy and function also showed differences between the agricultural sites and the reference site; however, contrary to our hypothesis, more genes were differentially expressed between the two agricultural sites than either site compared to the reference. For example, when compared between sites, BC and NC had 16 and 36 pairwise differentially expressed functions in the summer and fall, respectively, whilst the reference SR site had at most 11 and 25 differentially expressed functions when compared to the other sites. SR was also intermediate between BC and NC in terms of within‐site seasonal differentially expressed functions. Thus, sites in the agriculturally impacted watersheds appeared more distinct from each other and exhibited greater seasonal differences in sediment microbial nutrient metabolisms compared to the more natural reference site. This has been observed in past research, where impacted environments diverge in microbial function, but in manners that reflect the site‐specific anthropogenic stressors (Cagnon et al. 2017; Falk et al. 2019; Van Gray et al. 2020). Here, the form of fertiliser amendment (either inorganic or a manure/inorganic mix) that characterised the watershed was associated with a divergence of microbial function away from the reference state, but in different manners, which is expanded on in Section 4.4.
This divergence in function was also greatest in the fall, where there were 42 differentially expressed functions between sites compared to 21 in the summer. This was associated with a decrease in the number of shared core‐active taxa across sites, where summer had 6 genera shared, whilst fall had 3. Thus, as sediments became more distinct in function, they shared fewer of the same active taxa, suggesting a connection between functional and taxonomic turnover. Temperature variations and increased precipitation in the fall can shift the headwater environment, and this may explain the greater microbial differences between the sites compared to summer, where conditions are more uniform. For example, increased precipitation in the fall can lead to greater loading of microbial cells into waterways, which increases phylogenetic diversity, whereas stagnant summer conditions homogenise communities and increase microbial equality (i.e., Shannon diversity) (Liu et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2019), which explains the enhanced functional differences seen in fall in this study. Future studies should consider seasonal effects, which may skew the interpretation of differential function if only a single season is monitored, as has been advised for biotic health indices using benthic invertebrates (Callanan et al. 2008).
4.3. Site‐Specific Trends in Microbial Metatranscriptomic Profiles
4.3.1. Big Creek—Microbial Functional Relationships to Inorganic Fertiliser Loads
Nitrate reduction and sulphur oxidation were prevalent metabolic pathways in BC sediments. Both denitrification and DNRA co‐occur to reduce nitrate; however, DNRA appeared more prevalent from the high expression of narH and napA transcripts. Lower sediment redox increases DNRA over denitrification, as identified previously in sediments (Biessy et al. 2022). DNRA could be contributing to the high concentrations of ammonium detected in surface waters, in addition to ammonium nitrate, urea, or ammonium sulphate sourced from inorganic fertiliser use that characterises the BC watershed. DNRA can be energetically coupled to sulphur oxidation in sediments, and here, reduced iron‐sulphide mineral phases could be the electron donors for this coupled process, as observed in laboratory studies (Bosch et al. 2012). Visual evidence of this process included Fe oxidation–reduction fronts observed during sediment collection, as well as micron‐sized framboid‐like minerals detected via SEM (Figure S1). Microbial sulphate reduction transcripts, which were prevalent in BC sediments, can initiate the conversion of SO4 and/or elemental S back into reduced iron‐sulphide phases, which is proposed to be a concomitant pathway in this system that returns oxidised S to a reduced form, which can then react with additional nitrate and perpetuate the cycle. Sediments at BC have lower oxidation–reduction potentials (ORP) with depth, well in the range expected for sulphate reduction (Falk et al. 2023). The detection of core‐active genera capable of S‐oxidation and N‐reduction genera in the summer and fall at BC, including Thiobacillus, Sulfuritalea, Aquabacterium, Sideroxydans, and Dechloromonas, supports these metabolic pathways (Guan et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2024; Watanabe et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2022). Studies within Big Creek have also observed decreasing N loads over time (Nelligan et al. 2021), which could be due in part to the differential expression of a nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) involved in the conversion of N2O to N2, which completes the removal of NO‐species from the system and was hypothesised to be an active pathway in agricultural headwater sediments. Because N2O is a potent greenhouse gas, its removal through microbially mediated denitrification provides an added ecological benefit. Future research could focus on replicating the conditions found in Big Creek sediments to promote complete denitrification in constructed waterways, wetlands, or passive treatment systems. In summary, DNRA, as an ammonia‐producing/N‐reduction pathway, appears tightly coupled to S oxidation–reduction in the inorganic/chemical fertiliser‐impacted sediments, and nosZ may be responsible for NO3 removal trends in the system.
In terms of P, the high‐affinity periplasmic phosphate‐binding protein PstS showed higher expression at BC in the summer compared to expression at NC and SR. Pst genes can be expressed when P is limited (Harke et al. 2016; Hsieh and Wanner 2010); yet Big Creek exhibited high summer concentrations of SRP and TP relative to the other two sites. However, soluble P concentrations at Big Creek in the summer of 2020 (0.05 mg L−1) were lower than concentrations from early, middle, and late summer collections in 2019 (0.14, 0.09, and 0.11 mg L−1, respectively), thus the PstS response may be indicative of annual‐scale P availability trends at BC. In line with this, a low‐affinity inorganic phosphate transporter showed increased expression at BC in the fall when P concentrations were higher (0.08 mg L−1). Thus, microbial P metabolism genes observed at BC appear to reflect temporal P limitations and availability. The high abundance of the core‐active genus OLB 12 at BC also supports these trends, as this taxon is known to be a phosphate‐accumulating organism (PAO) (Hei et al. 2022).
4.3.2. Nissouri Creek—Microbial Functional Relationships to Manure Fertiliser Loads
At NC, higher NO3 concentrations in the water column and higher sediment TOC and labile P observed in a previous study are indicative of manure applications in the watershed (Falk et al. 2021; Jones et al. 2019). Despite NO3 being high, denitrification and DNRA genes were expressed less expressed than in BC and SR sediments, as were S‐oxidation genes. Rather, NC showed nitrosative stress and S‐assimilation genes with higher expression in the summer, when NO3 and SO4 concentrations were also higher. Nitrosative stress occurs in cells due to the accumulation of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and is linked to excess N in the environment that is not removed by complete denitrification to N2 (Freedman et al. 2016; VanMensel et al. 2020). This aligns with the decreased expression of nosZ seen in NC sediments that microorganisms use to convert nitrous oxide to N2. In addition, hydroxylamine reductase (hao) was highly expressed in NC sediments during the summer, which oxidises ammonia into nitrogen intermediates (Soler‐Jofra et al. 2021), with the ammonia oxidising bacteria (AOB) Nitrosomonas identified as a core‐active taxon and highly abundant in RNA‐based amplicon analysis. Nitrosomonas may be partly responsible for the production of N intermediates that accumulate in the system that do not get removed via complete denitrification, triggering the high expression of nitrosative stress pathways in members of the microbial community. In addition, Nitrosomonas itself can be resistant to the effects of RNS, as reported in a previous study (Laloo et al. 2018), which would explain its high abundance in NC sediments. Nitrosative stress genes were expressed less expressed in the fall at NC, coinciding with lower N compound concentrations in the water column and the absence of Nitrosomonas as a core‐active taxon.
P metabolism trends at NC showed that hppa was highly expressed in both seasons, whilst P‐uptake and transport genes (including SphS, PstA, PstB, and PstC) increased in the fall, particularly in comparison to BC. This coincided with increases in SRP (750%) and TP (667%) water column concentrations in the fall at NC over summer, compared to increases of 60% and 19% at BC, respectively. OLB12 and another PAO, C. Accumulibacter, were more abundant in NC sediment in the summer when P was more limited compared to the fall, which matched the trends at BC. The exact role of these PAOs in headwater sediments should be explored further, but it appears that they persist in agriculturally impacted sediments when P is seasonally low and possibly contribute to low available P by sequestering phosphate into cells, as observed in wastewater treatment biological P removal (BPR) studies (Rubio‐Rincón et al. 2017).
4.3.3. Saugeen River—Microbial Functional Relationships at a Low‐Impact Reference Location
SR sediment microbial function and seasonal functional turnover were more similar to NC overall; however, there were also pathways that showed greater similarity to BC. Thus, SR proved to be an appropriate intermediate to compare divergent pathways of N, P, and S metabolism against the agriculturally impacted sites. napA and nosZ were consistent seasonally; however, ammonia processing and N‐fixation genes showed an increase relative to BC and NC in the fall. As external sources of TN are lower at the SR sampling site due to less intensive fertiliser applications, N‐fixation genes were hypothesised to be more expressed to supply bioavailable NH4 +. For example, observations of small streams have shown a negative correlation between N fixation rates and nitrate‐N concentrations, with nitrate being more pronounced in agricultural streams (Caton et al. 2018). Our results support these conclusions, with N‐fixation genes also correlated with increased expression of ammonia assimilation/oxidation genes in the fall. Lower average available NO3 may also require microbial communities to utilise low‐affinity N‐reductases, such as napA, which showed high expression in SR sediments. In addition, SR also showed S‐oxidation expression trends similar to BC; thus, the coupled S‐oxidation/N‐reduction pathway hypothesised in BC sediments may also operate at SR. However, the primary taxon responsible for these transformations may be different. The core‐active genus Sulfuritalea showed the greater abundance in SR sediments, contrasting with Aquabacterium and Thiobacillus as the top contenders at BC, and is well recognised for its capacity for S‐oxidation using nitrate as the electron acceptor (Sperfeld et al. 2019).
In terms of P metabolism, hppa was highly expressed, like BC and NC. This demonstrates the universal importance of this gene, which encodes proteins key to cellular energy metabolism and ion transport, and future work may further explore hppa expression as a possible housekeeping gene for expression normalisation in metatranscriptomic studies.
In comparison to the agricultural sites, SR sediments exhibited elevated microbial diversity as indicated by the highest number of core‐active taxa detected (n = 68) and a high seasonal turnover in functionality. Although higher stream microbial diversity does not always correspond with decreased anthropogenic stress (Simonin et al. 2019), the detection of more active taxa via a DNA‐ and RNA‐based approach, along with the seasonal shift in function at SR, suggests a wider realised and fundamental niche, which can infer ecosystem resilience (Avila‐Jimenez et al. 2020; Girvan et al. 2005). Unique core‐active taxa at SR included Ferritrophicum, Denitratisoma, and Sulfuricella, and these taxa may be valuable microbial bioindicators of a healthy headwater sediment function.
5. Conclusions
Freshwater sediments in agriculturally impacted watersheds display distinct microbial functional and taxonomic patterns compared to less‐impacted reference sites, highlighting the influence of chronic nutrient loads on microbial biogeochemical cycling. Using RNA‐ and DNA‐based sequencing alongside metatranscriptomics, this study provides evidence that RNA‐derived taxa align more strongly with N, P, and S metabolic functions than DNA‐derived taxa, emphasising the utility of RNA for capturing active microbial processes. Site‐specific trends revealed significant differences in nutrient metabolism across impacted sites, which aligned with watershed fertiliser characteristics as well as temporal changes. Big Creek, characterised by inorganic fertiliser amendment, exhibited tightly coupled nitrate reduction and sulphur oxidation pathways, whilst Nissouri Creek, influenced more by manure applications, showed enhanced nitrosative stress and sulphur assimilation processes, with low expression of nosZ genes. In contrast, the reference site, Saugeen River, demonstrated intermediate functional turnover, with evidence of greater nitrogen fixation to supply bioavailable N to the system, and higher diversity in RNA/DNA‐leveraged core‐active microbial taxa, indicative of a healthier ecosystem. Seasonal variation, particularly in the fall, amplified differences in microbial activity and core‐taxa turnover, underscoring the importance of incorporating temporal dynamics in assessments of nutrient‐driven microbial transformations.
With respect to our hypotheses:
RNA‐based taxa data correlated more strongly with metatranscriptomic datasets than DNA‐based taxa.
Agriculturally impacted sites differed from the reference site in terms of sediment microbial function, but inorganic and manure‐affected watershed sites showed greater differences to each other.
Phosphorus uptake and metabolism gene expression patterns in sediments were complex and potentially responded to temporal P limitations rather than the general expectation of P loads to watersheds. nosZ was highly expressed at the inorganic‐fertiliser‐impacted and reference sites, but not at the manure‐impacted site, suggesting a short circuit in N removal at the latter.
N‐fixation appeared more pronounced at the low‐impact reference site as a means of supplying bioavailable nitrogen.
These findings suggest that non‐point nutrient anthropogenic stressors not only alter microbial function but also drive site‐specific adaptations, providing critical insights for monitoring and managing nutrient impacts in freshwater ecosystems.
Author Contributions
Nicholas W. Falk: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, methodology, visualization, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, data curation. Ian G. Droppo: conceptualization, investigation, writing – review and editing, methodology, formal analysis, project administration, resources, supervision. Ken G. Drouillard: conceptualization, investigation, funding acquisition, methodology, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, project administration, resources, supervision. Christopher G. Weisener: supervision, resources, project administration, formal analysis, writing – review and editing, methodology, conceptualization, investigation, funding acquisition.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Consent
All authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organisation where the work has been carried out.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Figure S1: Evidence of Fe oxidation–reduction fronts in Big Creek bed sediments. (A) Surface sediment exhibiting Fe‐oxidation characteristics. (B) Framboidal‐like mineral phase in surface sediments consistent with reduced FeS habit. Sediment was placed on an SEM sample stub and air dried, and then examined using a FEI Quanta 200F ESEM under low vacuum.
Table S1: Big Creek and Nissouti Creek agricultural characteristics.
Table S2: 16S Amplicon sample metadata.
Table S3: Bed sediment Metatranscriptomic sample details.
Tabls S4. DESeq2 pairwise site comparisons for summer functions.
Tabls S5. DESeq2 pairwise site comparisons for fall functions.
Tabls S6. DESeq2 pairwise site comparisons for season all sites.
Tabls S7. Lefse three‐way site comparisons for summer for significant functions identified via DESeq2.
Tabls S8. Lefse three‐way site comparisons for fall for significant functions identified via DESeq2.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research (GLIER) technicians Sharon Lackie (SEM), Jonathon Leblanc (IGF), and Nargis Ismail (OANL) for aid in sample preparation and analysis, and field and lab assistance from Bryce Ducharme. Research was supported through an NSERC Strategic Partners Grant (STP 521430‐18). Open access publishing facilitated by Flinders University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Flinders University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Falk, N. W. , Droppo I. G., Drouillard K. G., and Weisener C. G.. 2025. “Combined DNA/RNA Amplicon Sequencing and Metatranscriptomics Reveals Microbial‐Driven Nutrient Transformations and Core Taxa in Agriculturally Impacted Sediments.” Environmental Microbiology Reports 17, no. 5: e70205. 10.1111/1758-2229.70205.
Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, STP 521430‐18.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
References
- Attard, E. , Recous S., Chabbi A., et al. 2011. “Soil Environmental Conditions Rather Than Denitrifier Abundance and Diversity Drive Potential Denitrification After Changes in Land Uses.” Global Change Biology 17, no. 5: 1975–1989. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02340.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Avila‐Jimenez, M. L. , Burns G., He Z., et al. 2020. “Functional Associations and Resilience in Microbial Communities.” Microorganisms 8, no. 6: 1–14. 10.3390/microorganisms8060951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett, S. E. , and Shade A.. 2024. “Arrive and Wait: Inactive Bacterial Taxa Contribute to Perceived Soil Microbiome Resilience After a Multidecadal Press Disturbance.” Ecology Letters 27, no. 3: 14393. 10.1111/ele.14393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biessy, L. , Pearman J. K., Waters S., Vandergoes M. J., and Wood S. A.. 2022. “Metagenomic Insights to the Functional Potential of Sediment Microbial Communities in Freshwater Lakes.” Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 6: 59–74. 10.3897/MBMG.6.79265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bocaniov, S. A. , Van Cappellen P., and Scavia D.. 2019. “On the Role of a Large Shallow Lake (Lake St. Clair, USA‐Canada) in Modulating Phosphorus Loads to Lake Erie.” Water Resources Research 55, no. 12: 10548–10564. 10.1029/2019WR025019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bokulich, N. A. , Kaehler B. D., Rideout J. R., et al. 2018. “Optimizing Taxonomic Classification of Marker‐Gene Amplicon Sequences With QIIME 2's q2‐Feature‐Classifier Plugin.” Microbiome 6, no. 1: 1–17. 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bosch, J. , Lee K. Y., Jordan G., Kim K. W., and Meckenstock R. U.. 2012. “Anaerobic, Nitrate‐Dependent Oxidation of Pyrite Nanoparticles by thiobacillus denitrificans .” Environmental Science and Technology 46, no. 4: 2095–2101. 10.1021/es2022329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Broman, E. , Bonaglia S., Norkko A., Creer S., and Nascimento F. J. A.. 2021. “High Throughput Shotgun Sequencing of eRNA Reveals Taxonomic and Derived Functional Shifts Across a Benthic Productivity Gradient.” Molecular Ecology 30, no. 13: 3023–3039. 10.1111/mec.15561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cagnon, C. , Lauga B., and Duran R.. 2017. “Microbial Responses to Pollution—Ecotoxicology: Introducing the Different Biological Levels.” In Microbial Ecotoxicology. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Callahan, B. J. , McMurdie P. J., Rosen M. J., Han A. W., Johnson A. J. A., and Holmes S. P.. 2016. “DADA2: High‐Resolution Sample Inference From Illumina Amplicon Data.” Nature Methods 13, no. 7: 581–583. 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Callanan, M. , Baars J. R., and Kelly‐Quinn M.. 2008. “Critical Influence of Seasonal Sampling on the Ecological Quality Assessment of Small Headwater Streams.” Hydrobiologia 610, no. 1: 245–255. 10.1007/s10750-008-9439-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Caton, I. R. , Caton T. M., and Schneegurt M. A.. 2018. “Nitrogen‐Fixation Activity and the Abundance and Taxonomy of nifH Genes in Agricultural, Pristine, and Urban Prairie Stream Sediments Chronically Exposed to Different Levels of Nitrogen Loading.” Archives of Microbiology 200, no. 4: 623–633. 10.1007/s00203-018-1475-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Vrieze, J. , Pinto A. J., Sloan W. T., and Ijaz U. Z.. 2018. “The Active Microbial Community More Accurately Reflects the Anaerobic Digestion Process: 16S rRNA (Gene) Sequencing as a Predictive Tool.” Microbiome 6: 63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar, R. C. 2010. “Search and Clustering Orders of Magnitude Faster Than BLAST.” Bioinformatics 26, no. 19: 2460–2461. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faith, D. P. 1991. “Conservation Evaluation and Phylogenetic Diversity.” Biological Conservation 61, no. 1: 1–10. 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90168-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Falk, N. , Day M., and Weisener C. G.. 2021. “Evaluating Sediment Phosphorus Exchange in Rural Ontario Headwaters by Paired Sequential Extraction and Sorption Isotherms.” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 232, no. 10: 1–14. 10.1007/s11270-021-05381-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Falk, N. , Droppo I. G., Drouillard K. G., and Weisener C. G.. 2022. “Integrating Microbial DNA Community Analyses Into Time Integrated Suspended Sediment Sampling Methods.” Journal of Soils and Sediments 23: 3574–3588. 10.1007/s11368-022-03293-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Falk, N. , Droppo I. G., Drouillard K. G., and Weisener C. G.. 2023. “Biogeochemical Processes and Microbial Dynamics Governing Phosphorus Retention and Release in Sediments: A Case Study in Lower Great Lakes Headwaters.” Environmental Management 72: 932–944. 10.1007/s00267-023-01859-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falk, N. , Reid T., Skoyles A., Grgicak‐Mannion A., Drouillard K., and Weisener C. G.. 2019. “Microbial Metatranscriptomic Investigations Across Contaminant Gradients of the Detroit River.” Science of the Total Environment 690: 121–131. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Febria, C. M. , Fulthorpe R. R., and Williams D. D.. 2010. “Characterizing Seasonal Changes in Physicochemistry and Bacterial Community Composition in Hyporheic Sediments.” Hydrobiologia 647, no. 1: 113–126. 10.1007/s10750-009-9882-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Freedman, Z. B. , Upchurch R. A., and Zak D. R.. 2016. “Microbial Potential for Ecosystem N Loss Is Increased by Experimental N Deposition.” PLoS One 11, no. 10: e0164531. 10.1371/journal.pone.0164531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibbons, S. M. , Jones E., Bearquiver A., et al. 2014. “Human and Environmental Impacts on River Sediment Microbial Communities.” PLoS One 9, no. 5: 1–9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Girvan, M. S. , Campbell †. C. D., Killham K., Prosser J. I., and Glover L. A.. 2005. “Bacterial Diversity Promotes Community Stability and Functional Resilience After Perturbation.” Environmental Microbiology 7, no. 3: 301–313. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goltsman, D. S. A. , Comolli L. R., Thomas B. C., and Banfield J. F.. 2015. “Community Transcriptomics Reveals Unexpected High Microbial Diversity in Acidophilic Biofilm Communities.” ISME Journal 9: 1014–1023. 10.1038/ismej.2014.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Government of Canada . 2022. “Historical Data, Environmental and Natural Resources Canada.” https://climate.weather.gc.ca/historical_data/search_historic_data_e.html.
- Graham, E. B. , Wieder W. R., Leff J. W., et al. 2014. “Do We Need to Understand Microbial Communities to Predict Ecosystem Function? A Comparison of Statistical Models of Nitrogen Cycling Processes.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 68: 279–282. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grossmann, L. , Beisser D., Bock C., et al. 2016. “Trade‐Off Between Taxon Diversity and Functional Diversity in European Lake Ecosystems.” Molecular Ecology 25, no. 23: 5876–5888. 10.1111/mec.13878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan, Y. , Hou T., Li X., Feng L., and Wang Z.. 2022. “Metagenomic Insights Into Comparative Study of Nitrogen Metabolic Potential and Microbial Community Between Primitive and Urban River Sediments.” Environmental Research 212: 113592. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harke, M. J. , Davis T. W., Watson S. B., and Gobler C. J.. 2016. “Nutrient‐Controlled Niche di Ff Erentiation of Western Lake Erie Cyanobacterial Populations Revealed via Metatranscriptomic Surveys.” Environmental Science & Technology 50: 604–615. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hei, S. , Xu H., Liu Y., et al. 2022. “Redox Environment Inducing Strategy for Enhancing Biological Phosphorus Removal in a Full‐Scale Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant.” Journal of Cleaner Production 376: 134237. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horton, D. J. , Theis K. R., Uzarski D. G., and Learman D. R.. 2019. “Microbial Community Structure and Microbial Networks Correspond to Nutrient Gradients Within Coastal Wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes.” FEMS Microbiology Ecology 95, no. 4: 1–17. 10.1093/femsec/fiz033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsieh, Y. J. , and Wanner B. L.. 2010. “Global Regulation by the Seven‐Component Pi Signaling System.” Current Opinion in Microbiology 13, no. 2: 198–203. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S. , Chen C., and Jaffé P. R.. 2018. “Seasonal Distribution of Nitrifiers and Denitrifiers in Urban River Sediments Affected by Agricultural Activities.” Science of the Total Environment 642: 1282–1291. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenny, J. P. , Anneville O., Arnaud F., et al. 2020. “Scientists' Warning to Humanity: Rapid Degradation of the World's Large Lakes.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 46: 686–702. 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jewell, T. N. M. , Karaoz U., Brodie E. L., Williams K. H., and Beller H. R.. 2016. “Metatranscriptomic Evidence of Pervasive and Diverse Chemolithoautotrophy Relevant to C, S, N, and Fe Cycling in a Shallow Alluvial Aquifer.” ISME Journal 10, no. 9: 2106–2117. 10.1038/ismej.2016.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia, X. , Dini‐Andreote F., and Salles J. F.. 2020. “Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data.” Microorganisms 8, no. 6: 1–14. 10.3390/microorganisms8060798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones, C. S. , Drake C. W., Hruby C. E., Schilling K. E., and Wolter C. F.. 2019. “Livestock Manure Driving Stream Nitrate.” Ambio 48, no. 10: 1143–1153. 10.1007/s13280-018-1137-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh, K. , Misawa K., Kuma K. I., and Miyata T.. 2002. “MAFFT: A Novel Method for Rapid Multiple Sequence Alignment Based on Fast Fourier Transform.” Nucleic Acids Research 30, no. 14: 3059–3066. 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keegan, K. P. , Glass E. M., and Meyer F.. 2016. “MG‐RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function.” Microbial Environmental Genomics (MEG) 1399, no. 6000: 167–182. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3369-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly, M. C. , Zeglin L. H., Husic A., and Burgin A. J.. 2021. “High Supply, High Demand: A Fertilizer Waste Release Impacts Nitrate Uptake and Metabolism in a Large River.” Journal of Geophysical Research—Biogeosciences 126, no. 12: 1–16. 10.1029/2021JG006469.37089664 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Laloo, A. E. , Wei J., Wang D., et al. 2018. “Mechanisms of Persistence of the Ammonia‐Oxidizing Bacteria Nitrosomonas to the Biocide Free Nitrous Acid.” Environmental Science and Technology 52, no. 9: 5386–5397. 10.1021/acs.est.7b04273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamers, L. P. M. , van Diggelen J. M. H., Op Den Camp H. J. M., et al. 2012. “Microbial Transformations of Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Iron Dictate Vegetation Composition in Wetlands: A Review.” Frontiers in Microbiology 3, no. APR: 156. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Moal, M. , Gascuel‐Odoux C., Ménesguen A., et al. 2018. “Eutrophication: A New Wine in an Old Bottle?” Science of the Total Environment 651: 1–11. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, X. , Deng Q., Zhang Z., et al. 2022. “The Role of Sulfur Cycle and Enzyme Activity in Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction Processes in Heterotrophic Sediments.” Chemosphere 308: 136385. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B. , Guo F., Xie P., et al. 2023. “Differences in Sediment Microbial Community Structure and Co‐Occurrence Network in Different Seasons.” Journal of Soils and Sediments 23, no. 9: 3539–3549. 10.1007/s11368-023-03613-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Loeppmann, S. , Semenov M., Kuzyakov Y., and Blagodatskaya E.. 2018. “Shift From Dormancy to Microbial Growth Revealed by RNA:DNA Ratio.” Ecological Indicators 85: 603–612. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Love, M. I. , Huber W., and Anders S.. 2014. “Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA‐Seq Data With DESeq2.” Genome Biology 15, no. 12: 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lozupone, C. , and Knight R.. 2005. “UniFrac: A New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, no. 12: 8228–8235. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lozupone, C. A. , Hamady M., Kelley S. T., and Knight R.. 2007. “Quantitative and Qualitative β Diversity Measures Lead to Different Insights Into Factors That Structure Microbial Communities.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73, no. 5: 1576–1585. 10.1128/AEM.01996-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall, A. J. , Longmore A., Phillips L., et al. 2021. “Nitrogen Cycling in Coastal Sediment Microbial Communities With Seasonally Variable Benthic Nutrient Fluxes.” Aquatic Microbial Ecology 86: 1–19. 10.3354/AME01954. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall, A. J. , Phillips L., Longmore A., et al. 2023. “Using Metatranscriptomics to Better Understand the Role of Microbial Nitrogen Cycling in Coastal Sediment Benthic Flux Denitrification Efficiency.” Environmental Microbiology Reports 15, no. 4: 308–323. 10.1111/1758-2229.13148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMahon, K. D. , and Read E. K.. 2013. “Microbial Contributions to Phosphorus Cycling in Eutrophic Lakes and Wastewater.” Annual Review of Microbiology 67: 199–219. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, F. , Paarmann D., D'Souza M., et al. 2008. “The Metagenomics RAST Server ‐ A Public Resource for the Automatic Phylogenetic and Functional Analysis of Metagenomes.” BMC Bioinformatics 9: 1–8. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, K. M. , Petersen I. A. B., Tobi E., Korte L., and Bohannan B. J. M.. 2019. “Use of RNA and DNA to Identify Mechanisms of Bacterial Community Homogenization.” Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 2066. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelligan, C. , Sorichetti R. J., Yousif M., et al. 2021. “Then and Now: Revisiting Nutrient Export in Agricultural Watersheds Within Southern Ontario's Lower Great Lakes Basin.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 47: 1689–1701. 10.1016/j.jglr.2021.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Newcomer Johnson, T. A. , Kaushal S. S., Mayer P. M., Smith R. M., and Sivirichi G. M.. 2016. “Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis.” Water 8, no. 4: 1–28. 10.3390/w8040116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Overbeek, R. , Olson R., Pusch G. D., et al. 2014. “The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of Microbial Genomes Using Subsystems Technology (RAST).” Nucleic Acids Research 42, no. D1: 206–214. 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paulson, J. N. , and Bravo H. C.. 2013. “metagenomeSeq: Statistical Analysis for Sparse High‐Throughput Sequencing.” Bioconductor package 1.0.
- Pochon, X. , Zaiko A., Fletcher L. M., Laroche O., and Wood S. A.. 2017. “Wanted Dead or Alive? Using Metabarcoding of Environmental DNA and RNA to Distinguish Living Assemblages for Biosecurity Applications.” PLoS One 12, no. 11: e0187636. 10.1371/journal.pone.0187636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quast, C. , Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., et al. 2013. “The SILVA Ribosomal RNA Gene Database Project: Improved Data Processing and Web‐Based Tools.” Nucleic Acids Research 41, no. D1: 590–596. 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Records, R. M. , Wohl E., and Arabi M.. 2016. “Phosphorus in the River Corridor.” Earth‐Science Reviews 158: 65–88. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rubio‐Rincón, F. J. , Lopez‐Vazquez C. M., Welles L., van Loosdrecht M. C. M., and Brdjanovic D.. 2017. “Cooperation Between Candidatus Competibacter and Candidatus Accumulibacter Clade I, in Denitrification and Phosphate Removal Processes.” Water Research 120: 156–164. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanz‐Luque, E. , Bhaya D., and Grossman A. R.. 2020. “Polyphosphate: A Multifunctional Metabolite in Cyanobacteria and Algae.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11, no. June: 1–21. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segata, N. , Izard J., Waldron L., et al. 2011. “Metagenomic Biomarker Discovery and Explanation.” Genome Biology 12, no. 6: 1–18. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simonin, M. , Voss K. A., Hassett B. A., et al. 2019. “In Search of Microbial Indicator Taxa: Shifts in Stream Bacterial Communities Along an Urbanization Gradient.” Environmental Microbiology 21, no. 10: 3653–3668. 10.1111/1462-2920.14694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh, N. K. , Van Meter K. J., and Basu N. B.. 2023. “Widespread Increases in Soluble Phosphorus Concentrations in Streams Across the Transboundary Great Lakes Basin.” Nature Geoscience 16, no. 10: 893–900. 10.1038/s41561-023-01257-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soler‐Jofra, A. , Pérez J., and van Loosdrecht M. C. M.. 2021. “Hydroxylamine and the Nitrogen Cycle: A Review.” Water Research 190: 116723. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sperfeld, M. , Diekert G., and Studenik S.. 2019. “Anaerobic Aromatic Compound Degradation in Sulfuritalea hydrogenivorans sk43H.” FEMS Microbiology Ecology 95, no. 1: 1. 10.1093/femsec/fiy199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stutter, M. , Richards S., Ibiyemi A., and Watson H.. 2021. “Spatial Representation of In‐Stream Sediment Phosphorus Release Combining Channel Network Approaches and In‐Situ Experiments.” Science of the Total Environment 795: 148790. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Gray, J. B. , Roberto A. A., and Leff L. G.. 2020. “Acute Salt Stress Promotes Altered Assembly Dynamics of Nascent Freshwater Microbial Biofilms.” Hydrobiologia 847, no. 11: 2465–2484. 10.1007/s10750-020-04266-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- VanMensel, D. , Chaganti S. R., Droppo I. G., and Weisener C. G.. 2020. “Exploring Bacterial Pathogen Community Dynamics in Freshwater Beach Sediments: A Tale of Two Lakes.” Environmental Microbiology 22, no. 2: 568–583. 10.1111/1462-2920.14860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F. , Liang D., He W., et al. 2024. “Insights Into Sulfur Cycling Contribution to Nitrogen Removal in Sulfur Autotrophic Denitrification Combined Microbial Electrochemical Denitrification.” Chemical Engineering Journal 482: 148882. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.148882. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe, T. , Miura A., Iwata T., Kojima H., and Fukui M.. 2017. “Dominance of Sulfuritalea Species in Nitrate‐Depleted Water of a Stratified Freshwater Lake and Arsenate Respiration Ability Within the Genus.” Environmental Microbiology Reports 9, no. 5: 522–527. 10.1111/1758-2229.12557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, L. , Su J., Ali A., Chang Q., Shi J., and Yang Y.. 2022. “Denitrification Performance of Nitrate–Dependent Ferrous (Fe2+) Oxidizing Aquabacterium sp. XL4: Adsorption Mechanisms of Bio–Precipitation of Phenol and Estradiol.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 427: 127918. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zemskaya, T. I. , Bukin S. V., Lomakina A. V., and Pavlova O. N.. 2021. “Microorganisms in the Sediments of Lake Baikal, the Deepest and Oldest Lake in the World.” Microbiology 90, no. 3: 298–313. 10.1134/S0026261721030140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M. , Wu Z., Sun Q., Ding Y., Ding Z., and Sun L.. 2019. “The Spatial and Seasonal Variations of Bacterial Community Structure and Influencing Factors in River Sediments.” Journal of Environmental Management 248: 109293. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1: Evidence of Fe oxidation–reduction fronts in Big Creek bed sediments. (A) Surface sediment exhibiting Fe‐oxidation characteristics. (B) Framboidal‐like mineral phase in surface sediments consistent with reduced FeS habit. Sediment was placed on an SEM sample stub and air dried, and then examined using a FEI Quanta 200F ESEM under low vacuum.
Table S1: Big Creek and Nissouti Creek agricultural characteristics.
Table S2: 16S Amplicon sample metadata.
Table S3: Bed sediment Metatranscriptomic sample details.
Tabls S4. DESeq2 pairwise site comparisons for summer functions.
Tabls S5. DESeq2 pairwise site comparisons for fall functions.
Tabls S6. DESeq2 pairwise site comparisons for season all sites.
Tabls S7. Lefse three‐way site comparisons for summer for significant functions identified via DESeq2.
Tabls S8. Lefse three‐way site comparisons for fall for significant functions identified via DESeq2.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
