Abstract
The seed-beetle Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 the second most diverse genus of Bruchinae (Chrysomelidae) in the Western Hemisphere, is organized into groups of species, as many others in the subfamily. The main objective of this work is to delimit the group sclerolobii, here established as composed by five described species, A. sclerolobii Ribeiro-Costa, 2000, A. kingsolveri Ribeiro-Costa, 1993, A. marinonii Ribeiro-Costa, 1993, A. manauara Ribeiro-Costa, 2000, A. tachigaliae Kingsolver, 1976 and four new species: A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov., A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (type localities: Brazil: Amazonas, Manaus) and A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (type locality Brazil: Mato Grosso, Sinop). Therefore, including these new species 70 Brazilian species of Amblycerus were recorded. Amblycerus bicolor (Pic, 1927) previously considered to belong to this group is excluded and placed as incertae sedis. The sclerolobii group is distributed mainly in the Brazilian Amazonia biome, consuming Tachigali Aubl., Dinizia Ducke, and Stryphnodendron Mart. seeds (Fabaceae). Diagnoses are presented for this group and for ten species (including A. bicolor), and descriptions for the four new ones, an identification key for the nine species, colored photographs of external morphology, and detailed male genitalia illustrations for all the species studied. Due mainly to previously broad contributions on the taxonomy of Amblycerus that resulted in many species groups, we also present a revised study of this intrageneric taxonomic level. From 37 species groups now we update to 32 groups with a total of 96 species assigned to them. Finally, a detailed systematic study of some specific groups is also suggested before mergence.
Key words: Amblycerina , Neotropical region, seed beetles, systematics, Western Hemisphere
Introduction
Seed beetles (Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) currently encompasses approximately 1,750 described species worldwide (except Antarctica) and are assigned into 65 genera (Morse and Ribeiro-Costa 2024). Two genera stand out in the Western Hemisphere, Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 and Acanthoscelides Schilsky, 1905. Between 1990 and now, 32 Amblycerus species were described by the first author and her collaborators and mainly recorded from Brazil (Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2018), although the number of new Brazilian species seems inexhaustible and there are many to be discovered in other countries. Even with the description of a significant number of new taxa, Amblycerus is still the second largest genus of Bruchinae in the Western Hemisphere, after Acanthoscelides. While Amblycerus still needs a broad phylogenetic study to confirm its monophyly, it is unified by multiple characters (Kingsolver 2004); Acanthoscelides, however, is likely paraphyletic and lacks precise delimitation (Kergoat and Silvain 2004; Kergoat et al. 2005, 2008). Regardless of the diversity of both of these genera, previous authors have made efforts to organize each into definable species groups (Johnson 1983, 1989, 1990; Ribeiro-Costa 1995; Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996). This procedure was applied in multiple revisionary works of Bruchinae from the Western Hemisphere (e.g., Caryedes Hummel, 1827 by Kingsolver and Whitehead 1974, Ctenocolum Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974 by Albuquerque et al. (2014), Gibbobruchus Pic, 1913 by Manfio et al. 2013, and Sennius Bridwell, 1946 by Johnson and Kingsolver 1973).
Focusing on Brazilian Amblycerus, Ribeiro-Costa (1995) organized 56 species in 22 groups based on a phenetic analysis. One year later, Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) treated 40 species distributed in the United States and Mexico and placed them into 15 groups that they intuitively proposed. Romero-Nápoles et al. (2002) analyzed the same species revised in their previous paper based on a cladistic analysis of morphological characters and found that, of the 15 previously defined groups in their revisionary study (Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996), only nine clades corresponded to similar taxa.
Considering that these studies were developed almost concurrently (Ribeiro-Costa 1995; Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996) and that groups were not discussed between authors, comparisons of their composition is undoubtedly appropriate. In addition, over the years new species were added into groups (Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2014), being essentially an updated list of the current groups for future studies in Amblycerus.
It is clear that the groups/clades of Amblycerus are difficult to define, as numerous morphological features appear to have evolved independently in different lineages; therefore, there is a need for a cladistic morphological and/or molecular analysis with representatives from throughout the Western Hemisphere. We are aware many species treated by Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) from the United States and Mexico as well as some of the material treated in Ribeiro-Costa (1995) from Brazil have a wide distribution extending also in Central America. It is worth noting that Ribeiro-Costa (1995) included some Central American species in her Brazilian groups that were not included in her analysis due to their close morphological similarities with one or another Brazilian species. But, until now, no broad revisionary taxonomic study was developed on Amblycerus focusing on the fauna from the Central and other South American countries. Consequently, there is a gap to be filled and this knowledge may elucidate the current formation of groups, the affinity among them, and probably new species to be discovered.
Even with these difficulties and considering the high diversity of the genus, it is essential that we continue describing species and trying to organize species into groups as previous authors have done. Our aims are to provide valid names, identification keys, colored images that have not been presented in literature before (Ribeiro-Costa 1995; Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996, 2002), and detailed male genitalia illustrations for precise species identifications. All of these procedures will also reduce the gaps in understanding the diversification of the genus Amblycerus when a phylogeny will be available for the entire genus.
During recent studies of the Brazilian Amblycerus fauna we recognized four undescribed Amblycerus species, one of them provided by the second author. These species were identified as belonging to the sclerolobii group, one of the 22 groups suggested by Ribeiro-Costa (1995). This group is composed of five previously described species: Amblycerus sclerolobii Ribeiro-Costa, 2000, A. kingsolveri Ribeiro-Costa, 1993, A. marinonii Ribeiro-Costa, 1993, A. manauara Ribeiro-Costa, 2000, and A. bicolor (Pic, 1927), with A. bicolor the least joined to the others in the phenetic diagrams. As these species are not distributed in the United States and Mexico, and they were not included in Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996, 2002). The hosts of all of the species with known host associations belong to rainforest trees in the Caesalpinoideae clade of the Fabaceae (Bruneau et al. 2024).
This work has the aim to carry out a detailed morphological study of the sclerolobii species group, and identify any other species that may be included from other countries not evaluated by the previous authors (Ribeiro-Costa 1995; Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996), and to then provide a formal delimitation of the sclerolobii group that is lacking to date. We then take the opportunity to revise all Amblycerus groups and list the species composition of each one with their rearrangements and possible congruences.
Materials and methods
The material examined was loaned from the museums/collections listed below, except the specimens of A. tachigaliae Kingsolver, 1976 from Brazil for which we received only labels data from TAMU. Acronyms of museums/collections and curators’ names are also provided and correspond to those specified in Evenhuis (2024).
DZUPColeção de Entomologia Pe. J. S. Moure, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil (C. S. Ribeiro-Costa);
INPAColeção de Invertebrados, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil (A. L. Henriques);
MNRJMuseu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M. A. Monné);
MZSPMuseu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (S. Casari);
SDMC University of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America (research collection of G.E. Morse with ultimate deposition in the San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, California, United States of America);
TAMUTexas A&M University Insect Collection, College Station, Texas, United States of America (J. Oswald and M. Cupello);
USNMUnited States National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C., United States of America (A. Konstantinov and E. Roberts).
For the data of material examined, the labels were copied verbatim and a semicolon (;) separates different labels, backslashes (\) separates different lines in the same label, and text within square brackets are extra comments.
Most characters were observed from dry and pinned insects. The methods for extracting and clearing male genitalia followed Manfio et al. (2013). The illustrations of Amblycerus sclerolobii, A. manauara, A. kingsolveri, and A. marinonii were done as detailed in Ribeiro-Costa (1997) and are here modified from Ribeiro-Costa (1993, 2000). The illustrations of Amblycerus truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov., A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. tachigaliae, and A. bicolor followed the same methods of Ribeiro-Costa (1997), in which with the contours of the median lobe, the internal sac and each sclerite were obtained in general separately, and then a composition was made by plotting sclerites in layers from bottom to top in the internal sac. The equipment used for these procedures were Leica MZ6 stereomicroscope then Olympus BX50 microscope of the DZUP.
Colored images of the external morphology were captured in two ways. In the laboratory of the first author images of the external morphology were obtained using a Nikon D610 digital camera attached with a Nikon Macro Photo Lens AF-S Micro Nikkor 40mm f/2.8 coupled to Carl Zeiss Stemi 2000-C. The number of images taken per specimen were taken according to the depth of the specimen/structure, from lower to the upside. Images with no parts focused were excluded previously to proceed merging using the software Combine ZM 1.2 (Alan Hadley, United Kingdom). In the laboratory of the second author, they were captured using stacking technology developed by Macroscopic Solutions (Tolland, CT) using a Canon EOS 6D digital camera attached to a Canon Extension Tube EF25 II paired with a Canon Macro Photo Lens MP-E 65-mm 1×–5×. The number of images taken per specimen were optimized according to the depth of the specimen, and the resulting photographs were compiled using ZereneStacker v. 1.04 (Zerene Systems LLC, Richland, WA, USA) and saved and edited in JPEG format using the Adobe Photoshop 2023 application suite (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
The terminology adopted was that of Ribeiro-Costa et al. (2014), including terms for some thoracic and abdominal sclerites from Lawrence et al. (2010).
Host plant names are updated according to the Plants of the World Online Database from Kew Gardens (Powo 2024). The specific name A. sclerolobii was proposed in reference to the holotype host plant, Sclerolobium sp. Here we use the same name, sclerolobii, to formally establish the group sclerolobii to maintain the nomenclature stability. However, it is worth noting that the valid genus name of the host plant is Tachigali (Huamantupa-Chuquimaco et al. 2024). Host plant associations of all Amblycerus species groups will be explored in future studies.
Measurements were done using an ocular micrometer attached to a Carl Zeiss Discovery V8. We measured for dimensions up to ten specimens when available, although for indices one specimen of each species was randomly chosen following traits as demarcated in Ribeiro-Costa (1997:631; Figs 1, 2, 5, 8). Abbreviations were: BL, body length (from anterior margin of pronotum to elytra apex); BW, body width (the largest width). For the internal sac of male genitalia, the abbreviations were: BR, basal region; MR, median region; AR, apical region. Localities with asterisk (*) indicate new records.
Figure 1.
Amblycerus truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov.: A dorsal view B scutellum C punctures on lateral areas of pronotum D ventral view E head frontal view F lateral view G male pygidium H female pygidium. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 2.
Amblycerus truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov.: A median lobe of male genitalia B tegmen of male genitalia a intraspecific variation. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 5.
Amblycerus morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov.: A dorsal view B scutellum C head frontal view D lateral view E male pygidium F female pygidium G median lobe of male genitalia H tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C–F); 0.5 mm (B, G, H).
Figure 8.
Amblycerus marinonii Ribeiro-Costa, 1993 A dorsal view B scutellum C lateral view D head frontal view E male pygidium F median lobe of male genitalia G tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C, D); 0.5 mm (B, E, F, G).
Results and discussion
The text was divided in two sections: Taxonomy and Revision of Amblycerus species groups. In the section Taxonomy we present the descriptions of the new species as they are being keyed, and subsequently the diagnosis of the described species also in the same order they appear in the key. The same species sequence was followed in Table 1 and the plates that were organized by each species individually to facilitate precise species identification.
Table 1.
Species of the sclerolobii group of Amblycerus studied in this paper and the excluded species, their distribution and host plants. (-) Excluded species, (*) New record.
| Species | Distribution | Host plants |
|---|---|---|
| A. truncatus sp. nov. | Brazil (Mato Grosso-Sinop) | Dimorphandra macrostachya (Fabaceae) |
| A. falcorostrus sp. nov. | Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus) | Unknown |
| A. biacutus sp. nov. | Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus) | Stryphnodendron sp. (Fabaceae) |
| A. morsei sp. nov. | Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus) | Dinizia excelsa (Fabaceae) |
| A. manauara | Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus) | Unknown |
| A. sclerolobii | Brazil (Amazonas-Estirão do Equador, Minas Gerais-Viçosa) | Tachigali denudata (Fabaceae), Tachigali sp. |
| A. tachigaliae | Panama (Barro Colorado Isl., Colón*), Brazil* (Amazonas- Manaus) | Tachigali versicolor (Fabaceae) |
| A. kingsolveri | Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus-Rio Tarumã Mirim) | Unknown |
| A. marinonii | Brazil (Mato Grosso-Cuiabá, Goiás-Dianópolis, Barro Alto*) | Tachigali rubiginosa (Fabaceae) |
| A. bicolor | Brazil (Para), Suriname, French Guiana | Cassia sp. (Fabaceae) |
Taxonomy
The sclerolobii group, first suggested by Ribeiro-Costa (1995), is here modified by the exclusion of Amblycerus bicolor (Fig. 11), the phenetically distant species of the others of this group. This species shares characters of the group sclerolobii, including frons convex, the elytral vestiture composed of unicolorous setae, and elytra depressed, flat at middle (Ribeiro-Costa 1995). However, Ribeiro-Costa (1995) pointed out that the internal sac sclerites, the scutellum (Fig. 11C), and the color pattern of integument on the pygidium could exclude this species from the sclerolobii group. Here we agree with these comments and add more differences: pronotum with elongate coarse punctures on lateral areas (Fig. 11B); prosternal process very narrow, laminar; apex of elytra and pygidium with coarse punctures. In addition, considering the internal differences of male genitalia, we highlight two unpaired sclerite at MR (Fig. 11G), one anterior with denticles and the posterior long, entire, not as a wishbone-shaped sclerite similar to the species of the sclerolobii group which has separate stems. Until further character analyses and more complete sampling of species in the genus are developed, A. bicolor is considered here excluded from the sclerolobii group and placed incertae sedis.
Figure 11.
Amblycerus bicolor (Pic, 1927) A dorsal view B punctures on lateral areas of pronotum C scutellum D lateral view E head frontal view F male pygidium G median lobe of male genitalia H tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, B, D–F); 0.5 mm (C, G, H).
Analyzing material from Panamá, we observed that the species A. tachigaliae, not included in the previous works of Ribeiro-Costa (1995) and Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) because of its distribution, shares many external characters with the sclerolobii group that justify, at present, its inclusion in this group. We note mainly the general integument color, body vestiture homogeneous and unicolorous; pygidium with faint dense median line of setae; elytra flat medially; pronotum with moderate coarse punctures only on lateral areas; scutellum tridentate, all teeth the same size (Fig. 10). The pattern of sclerites of the internal sac of male genitalia do not show the same affinity with the pattern shown by the sclerolobii group; there is an extra pair of MR sclerite (Fig. 10G) in addition to the laminar sclerites, common to the sclerolobii group. This kind of discordance, pattern of vestiture versus pattern of genitalia, was also observed in A. manauara (Fig. 9), whose internal characters of male genitalia showed differences, mainly in the form of dorsal and ventral valve (Fig. 9F), compared to the others of the group sclerolobii. Therefore, to a lesser extent, but in the same way of A. bicolor, only after a broader analysis will it be possible to better understand the positioning of these species.
Figure 10.
Amblycerus tachigaliae Kingsolver, 1976 A dorsal view B scutellum C lateral view D lateral view variation E head frontal view F male pygidium G median lobe of male genitalia H tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C–F); 0.5 mm (B, G, H).
Figure 9.
Amblycerus manauara Ribeiro-Costa, 2000 A dorsal view B scutellum C lateral view D head frontal view E male pygidium F median lobe of male genitalia G tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C–E); 0.5 mm (B, F, G).
Group sclerolobii
Species composition. This group is composed of the five described species: A. sclerolobii, A. kingsolveri, A. marinonii, A. manauara, A. tachigaliae, and four new species: A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov., A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. and A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. The sclerolobii group is distinguished from other Amblycerus species groups by combinations of characters listed in the diagnosis.
Diagnosis. Integument homogeneous, without black spots, usually reddish brown on dorsum contrasting with dark brown to black on thoracic ventrites and legs. Dorsum covered with yellowish pubescence evenly distributed, without stripes or variegated pattern, sometimes near elytral sutures with whitish setae; pygidium usually with a faint dense median line of setae. Head without frontal carina, frons convex. Eye coarsely faceted, strongly prominent laterally, postocular lobe very narrow. Disc of pronotum with moderately coarse punctures only on lateral areas (Fig. 1C); prosternal process narrow, gently expanded beyond anterior coxae (Fig. 1D). Scutellum usually tridentate with all teeth the same size (Figs 3B, 4B, 5B, 6B, 7C, 8B, 9B, 10B), rarely truncate (Fig. 1B). Elytra depressed, flat medially, without coarse punctures on interstriae. Metanepisternum and metaventrite without coarse punctures (Fig. 1F), metepisternal sulcus usually as a right angle (Fig. 1F). Hind coxae with moderately coarse, sparse punctures (Fig. 1F). Pygidium with moderately coarse and dense punctures. Male genitalia, median lobe: dorsal valve usually subtriangular, lateral margins almost straight or gently curved, apex usually rounded. Internal sac, AR with a unique pair or two pairs of sclerites, MR with a pair of laminar sclerites usually with serrate margin and an unpaired wishbone-shaped sclerite.
Figure 3.
Amblycerus falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov.: A dorsal view B scutellum C lateral view D head frontal view E male pygidium F median lobe of male genitalia G tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C–E); 0.5 mm (B, F, G).
Figure 4.
Amblycerus biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov.: A dorsal view B scutellum C lateral view D head frontal view E male pygidium F median lobe of male genitalia G tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C–E); 0.5 mm (B, F, G).
Figure 6.
Amblycerus sclerolobii Ribeiro-Costa, 2000 A dorsal view B scutellum C lateral view D lateral view variation E head frontal view F male pygidium G female pygidium H median lobe of male genitalia I tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C–G); 0.5 mm (B, H, I).
Figure 7.
Amblycerus kingsolveri Ribeiro-Costa, 1993 A dorsal view B dorsal view variation C scutellum D head frontal view E male pygidium F lateral view G median lobe of male genitalia H tegmen of male genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, B–F); 0.5 mm (C, G, H).
Comparative notes. The sclerolobii group differs from the other groups proposed to date by several characters treated together (see Diagnosis). Analyzing the diagnostic characters of the group with the characters from the partial phylogeny of Amblycerus (Romero-Nápoles et al 2002) we could recognize the sclerolobii group shares the synapomorphy of two long, serrate blades (or laminar sclerites) in the internal sac of the male genitalia with the subclade A. barcenae + A. pictus that is part of the marmoratus clade with four other species. However, it differs by not having a strongly mottled pattern of pubescence on the dorsum, which is indicated by Romero-Nápoles et al. (2002) as a synapomorphy of the group.
It is interesting to draw attention that these two long serrate, laminar/blade sclerites occur in several species within the genus (Ribeiro-Costa 1995); however, they vary in general shape, length of the serrated margin, even whether they are straight or winding. Maybe the sclerolobii group should be included in a broader clade, which encourages further scientific investigation of this Amblycerus group.
Contrary to A. barcenae and A. pictus, the pterocarpae group, herein reorganized and comprising A. pterocarpae and A. luciae, externally resembles the sclerolobii group because of the homogeneous pattern of vestiture on the dorsum. However, the pattern of male sclerites in the internal sac easily separates these both groups.
It is difficult to recognize affinities within the sclerolobii group. Many of the external characters are variable and the internal characters of the sclerites of the internal sac show different affinities among species. For example, if we consider the laminar serrate sclerites at MR, we will recognize the following relations: winding sclerites shared by A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. (Fig. 3F), A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (Fig. 4F), A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (Fig. 5G) and A. sclerolobii (Fig. 6H); straight sclerites shared by A. kingsolveri (Fig. 7G), A. marinonii (Fig. 8F) and A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (Fig. 2). Amblycerus manauara (Fig. 9F) has laminar sclerites with different formats with two teeth each and, in A. tachigaliae (Fig. 10G) the laminar sclerite is straight, although the serration is restricted to the subapical area. On the other hand, if we observe the number of sclerites at AR of the internal sac, the affinities among species are: unique sclerite: A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (Fig. 2), A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. (Fig. 3F), A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (Fig. 4F), A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. (Fig. 5G); one pair: A. sclerolobii (Fig. 6H), A. tachigaliae (Fig. 10G), A. kingsolveri (Fig. 7G), A. marinonii (Fig. 8F); two pairs: A. manauara (Fig. 9F). These both male genitalia characters show different internal subgroupings. But, in general, we consider here A. manauara and A. tachigaliae the most distant species of the group sclerolobii.
Sexual dimorphism. Pygidium emargination at apex variable between sexes. Last abdominal ventrite of male emarginate at apex in some species.
Distribution. Neotropical region: recorded from Panamá to Brazil, from north to southeast region, most commonly found in the Amazon region (Table 1). During the development of the circumscription of the sclerolobii group it was possible to allocate one isolated Central American species into this group, A. tachigaliae. We also provisionally record here for the first time this species to Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus) including complete data labels based on specimens deposited at TAMU and identified by J. Romero-Nápoles. However, given the description of new closely related species from Brazil, the identifications of these specimens should be confirmed using the distinguishing characters provided in this paper. The other species of the group are exclusively Brazilian, and current records indicate that they are mainly distributed in the northern region of Brazil in the Amazonia Biome (A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov., A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov., A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov., A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov., A. manauara, A. sclerolobii and A. kingsolveri). The exception is A. marinonii that occurs in the midwest region of Brazil; as its holotype from 1992 and subsequent collecting records from 1998 and 2009 suggest its distribution is clearly in the Cerrado Biome, differing strikingly from the other Brazilian species of the group. Amblycerus sclerolobii is the unique Brazilian species with an extended distribution from Northern to Southeast, in the Atlantic Forest.
Host plants (Table 1). Fabaceae: Tachigali denudata (Vogel) Oliveira-Filho, Tachigali rubiginosa (Mart. ex Tul.) Oliveira-Filho, Tachigali versicolor Standl. & L.O. Williams, Dimorphandra macrostachya Benth, Dinizia excelsa Ducke and Stryphnodendron sp. (Table 1). All known hosts of species within the species group are rainforest trees in the Caesalpinoideae clade of the Fabaceae (Bruneau et al. 2024), the family that is the preferred host for species of the subfamily Bruchinae (Morse 2014). Dimorphandra macrostachya, Dinizia excelsa, and the genus Tachigali are in the closely related tribes Dimorphandreae, Campsiandreae, and Sclerolobieae, respectively. These three lineages include nine genera with 140–165 species of trees in Neotropical forests (Bruneau et al. 2024), with the genus Tachigali making up more than half of this diversity with 80–90 species. Three species of the group, A. sclerolobii, A. marinonii, and A. tachigaliae, share this diverse genus as a host. The genus Stryphnodendron is somewhat more distantly related within the tribe Mimoseae; it is a member of the Stryphnodendron clade that also includes forest trees in the Neotropics and is composed of seven genera and 56 species (Bruneau et al. 2024).
Key to the species of the sclerolobii group based on males
| 1 | Scutellum tridentate, all teeth the same size (Figs 3B, 4B, 5B, 6B, 7C, 8B, 9B, 10B) | 2 |
| – | Scutellum truncate (Fig. 1B) | Amblycerus truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. |
| 2 | Armature of internal sac, AR with a single sclerite or one pair of sclerites (Figs 3F, 4F, 5G, 6H, 7G, 8F, 10G | 3 |
| – | Armature of internal sac, AR with two pairs of sclerites (Fig. 9F) | Amblycerus manauara Ribeiro-Costa, 2000 |
| 3 | Armature of internal sac, AR with a single sclerite (Figs 3F, 4F, 5G) | 4 |
| – | Armature of internal sac, AR with one pair of sclerites (Figs 6H, 7G, 8F, 10G) | 5 |
| 4 | Armature of internal sac, MR with wishbone-shaped sclerite with serrate margin (Fig. 3F) | Amblycerus falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. |
| – | Armature of internal sac, MR with wishbone-shaped sclerite with smooth apical margin (Figs 4F, 5G) | 6 |
| 5 | Armature of internal sac, MR with a pair of winding, long, laminar sclerites (Fig. 6H) | Amblycerus sclerolobii Ribeiro-Costa, 2000 |
| – | Armature of internal sac, MR with a pair of straight sclerites (Figs 7G, 8F, 10G) | 7 |
| 6 | Pronotum with lateral carina almost reaching the anterior margin. Armature of internal sac, MR with wishbone-shaped sclerite short, large, rounded at apex (Fig. 4F) | Amblycerus biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. |
| – | Pronotum with lateral carina reaching ⅔ its length. Armature of internal sac, MR with wishbone-shaped sclerite long, slender, acute at apex (Fig. 5G) | Amblycerus morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. |
| 7 | Armature of internal sac, MR with wishbone-shaped sclerite shorter than the laminar sclerites (Figs 7G, 8F) | 8 |
| – | Armature of internal sac, MR with wishbone-shaped sclerite longer than the laminar sclerites (Fig. 10G) | Amblycerus tachigaliae Kingsolver, 1976 |
| 8 | Armature of the internal sac, AR with a spine-shaped pair of sclerites small and straight or gently curved (Fig. 7G) | Amblycerus kingsolveri Ribeiro-Costa, 1993 |
| – | Armature of the internal sac, AR with a tooth-shaped pair of sclerites large and strongly curved (Fig. 8F) | Amblycerus marinonii Ribeiro-Costa, 1993 |
. Amblycerus truncatus
Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov.
1E5DF499-BB5C-5056-8285-F989AEB90B32
https://zoobank.org/2D9F3E39-7DE3-4D91-8C60-C5BF2E373E84
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in DZUP with labels: Sinop-MT-Brasil\ 12-14/I/2000\ Caseiro, F.T. col., [white label, printed in black]; Planta hospedeira\ Dimorphandra macrostachya [white label, printed in black]; HOLOTYPE\ Amblycerus truncatus\ Ribeiro-Costa, [white label with red margin, printed in black]. Paratypes • (n = 5) with the same data as holotype, PARATYPE\ Amblycerus truncatus\ Ribeiro-Costa [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. Two paratypes deposited in DZUP and three paratypes in USDC.
Diagnosis.
Amblycerus truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. is the unique species in the group sclerolobii with truncate scutellum at apex (Fig. 1B) and can easily be identified by this character; the other species in the group have scutellum tridentate, with all teeth the same size. The internal characters of male genitalia also distinguish this species, mainly the unique sclerite at AR of internal sac U-shaped inverted with the stems further apart or only the transverse part of the U (Fig. 2A).
Description
. Dimensions: BL: 7.50–8.10 mm (x̄ = 7.86 mm; n = 6); BW: 4.70–5.00 mm (x̄ = 4.92 mm; n = 6)
Integument color: Reddish brown in following areas: first two antennomeres, apex of clypeus, labrum, pronotum, elytra, pygidium, metanepisternum, abdominal ventrites on lateral areas and first, middle legs and hind coxae. Dark brown: part of head, antennomeres except first two, thorax ventrites, abdominal ventrites on middle region and hind leg except coxae. Sometimes specimens entirely darker or paler but in general keep the contrast of colors, at least on antennomeres.
Vestiture: Dorsum covered with yellowish pubescence evenly distributed, sometimes whitish on darker integument; pygidium sometimes with faint dense median line of setae.
Head: Covered with fine and dense punctures, except clypeus at apex and middle to apex of labrum; punctures gently finer on vertex and coarser on clypeus. Frons convex, frontal carina absent, finely punctate or smooth line on midline, sometimes evanescent basally. Eye coarsely faceted, strongly prominent laterally. Ocular index 4.2; ocular sinus 0.1 of the eye length in lateral view; postocular lobe 0.2 the eye length. Antennae with antennomeres elongate except 2 ~ 1/3 the length of 1, moderately serrate from antennomeres 4–10; 11 elongate-acuminate. Frontoclypeal suture conspicuous. Prothorax: Pronotum semicircular, disk moderately convex, with lateral margins moderately arcuate in dorsal view, median basal lobe delimited, not carinate; cervical sulcus on 1/3 lateral reaching cervical boss with trichobothria; disc with fine and dense punctures, moderately coarse punctures on lateral areas; lateral carina almost reaching the anterior margin of pronotum. Prosternal process narrow, apex slightly expanded and gently beyond anterior coxae. Mesothorax and metathorax: Scutellum 1.3 longer than wide with truncate apex. Elytron 2.6 × longer than wide; striae composed of fine punctures joined in lines; all free apically except third and eighth joined; strial intervals only with fine punctures, somewhat flat medially, truncate apically. Mesoventrite truncate apically. Metanepisternum with only fine punctures, lacking striate file; metepisternal sulcus forming right angle, vertical axis not reaching the margin of metepisternum, longitudinal axis less than a half the length of metepisternum. Metaventrite with dense and fine punctures, without coarse punctures, not protuberant between mid coxae, median sulcus extending laterally a half or more than a half the length of metaventrite. Hind coxae with fine dense punctures; moderately coarse, sparse punctures on distal two-thirds. Hind femur slender, ~ 2.82 × longer than wide. Hind tibia with coronal denticles of about equal length; lateral spur ~ 2.36 × the length of median spur. First tarsomere ~ 1.20 the length of lateral spur and 2.84 × the length of median spur. Abdomen: Pygidium basal 1/3 covered by the elytra, with moderately coarse and dense punctures, apex subtruncate in males and subacute in females. Ventrites with moderately coarse, sparse punctures on lateral areas, last ventrite longer than ventrive IV, gently emarginate in male, rounded in female.
Male terminalia: Tergite VIII subsquare, subtruncate at apex. Median lobe ~ 3.95 × its widest at apical region; dorsal valve 0.73 × wider than long, subtriangular, lateral margins gently curved, apex rounded; ventral valve 1.59 × wider than long, lateral margins emarginate, apex acute. Armature of internal sac, AR with one sclerite U- shaped inverted with the stems further apart or only the transverse part of the U. MR with a pair of long, laminar, straight sclerites, outer margin serrate along its middle apical 0.5 length; wishbone-shaped sclerite 0.42 as long as the laminar sclerites length, gently curved, apex projected, subtruncate in lateral view or wishbone-shaped sclerite with similar form, less than half its length. BR with one sclerite with long stems gradually approximates. Tegmen with lateral lobes cleft to 1/12 of their length, strongly expanded laterally.
Etymology.
The specific name, an adjective in the nominative case, is Latin for truncate in reference to the shape of the scutellum of this species.
Distribution.
Brazil (Mato Grosso-Sinop)
Host plant.
Fabaceae: Dimorphandra macrostachya Benth.
. Amblycerus falcorostrus
Ribeiro-Costa & Morse sp. nov.
6DD3AA83-690C-52D7-92A4-70FD203A9B15
https://zoobank.org/64C48323-ECFB-4A1C-B9A7-91D92745CE4F
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in INPA, male, with labels: Brasil: Amazonas\ AM 010, Km 26\ Reserva Ducke\ 29-VIII-1978 [white label, printed in black except date handwritten]; armadilha\ de Malaise [white label, printed in black]; INPA [white label with black margin, printed in black]; Amblycerus\ sp.2\ Ribeiro-Costa, C.S. det. 2009 [white label with black margin, handwritten except name of identifier and date printed in black]; HOLOTYPE\ Amblycerus falcorostrus\ Ribeiro-Costa & Morse [white label with red margin, printed in black].
Diagnosis.
The main character to distinguish A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. from others in the group is the presence in the internal sac of male genitalia of a single, strongly curved tooth-shaped sclerite on both sides at AR (Fig. 3F).
Description.
The description of A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. is similar to A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. except by the following characters.
Dimensions: BL: 6.60 mm, BW: 3.80 mm (n = 1).
Integument color: Dark brown in following areas: vertex, apex of clypeus, labrum, pronotum, elytra, pygidium, abdominal ventrites, first femur and middle leg. Black on part of head, antennomeres, metanepisternum, metasternum, and hind leg.
Vestiture: Ventral region with whitish pubescence except abdominal ventrites with yellowish pubescence.
Head: Frontal carina absent, finely punctate or smooth on midline. Ocular index: 5.3; ocular sinus 0.05 of the eye length in lateral view. Prothorax: Pronotum with carinae bordering the basal lobe and laterally. Mesothorax and metathorax: Scutellum about as long as wide with tridentate apex, all teeth the same size. Elytron 1.4 × longer than wide. Metanepisteral sulcus with the vertical axis reaching the margin of metepisternum. Metaventrite with median sulcus extending laterally more than a half of its length. Hind femur ~ 2.72 × longer than wide. Hind tibia lateral spur ~ 2 × the length of median spur. First tarsomere ~ 1.38 × the length of lateral spur and 2.61 × the length of median spur. Abdomen: Pygidium rounded at apex in male, female unknown. Last ventrite almost the same length as ventrite IV, male apex not visible. Male terminalia: Tergite 8 gently emarginate at apex. Median lobe ~ 5.34 × its widest at apical region; dorsal valve 0.88 × wider than long; ventral valve 1.28 × wider than long. Armature of internal sac, AR with one strongly curved tooth-shaped sclerite in both sides. MR with a pair of winding, laminar sclerites, outer margin serrate along its middle apical 0.7 length; wishbone-shaped sclerite 0.63 as long as the laminar sclerites length, straight, apex enlarged, subtruncate and serrate in lateral view. Tegmen with lateral lobes cleft 1/16 of their length.
Etymology.
The specific name is a new Latin adjective in the nominative case meaning “with a falcon-like beak”. It refers to the form of the AR sclerite in the internal sac of the male genitalia.
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus).
Host plants.
Not known.
. Amblycerus biacutus
Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov.
E932F33B-BA9D-5478-B9AC-19CE62D3923D
https://zoobank.org/CB3488FE-10E9-457A-8388-45938AEE0A41
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in USNM, male, with labels: Ex Stryphnodendron\ SP. Krukoff\ 800S – Brazil, AM.\ Manaus, IX/X.1934 [white label, handwritten in black]; extracted from\ herbarium\ specimen [white label, printed in blue]; Amblycerus prov. nova prox.\ A. sclerolobii \C.S. Ribeiro-Costa det. 199.., [white label with black margin, handwritten except name of identifier and date printed in black]; HOLOTYPE\ Amblycerus biacutus\ Ribeiro-Costa [white label with red margin, printed in black].
Diagnosis.
This species can be separated from the others by the internal sac of male genitalia with a single, gently curved on both sides and acute at each apex (Fig. 4F). It can never be confused with A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. if comparing this sclerite at AR because of the curvature at apex: in A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., it is gently curved; in A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. it is strongly curved. Besides, differences can be found in the length at the apex and form of the wishbone-shaped sclerite at RM: in A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., it is short and the apex smooth; in A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. it is long and the apex serrated (Fig. 3F).
Description.
The description of A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. is similar to A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. except in the following characters.
Dimensions: BL: 6.70 mm, BW: 4.00 mm (n = 1).
Integument color: Similar to paler specimens of A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., except all antennomeres dark brown. Vestiture: Ventral region with whitish pubescence except abdominal ventrites with yellowish pubescence. Head: Frontal carina faint basally. Ocular index 3.94; ocular sinus 0.2 of the eye length in lateral view. Prothorax: Pronotum with carina bordering the basal lobe. Mesothorax and metathorax: Scutellum ~ 1.5 longer than wide with tridentate apex, all teeth the same size. Elytron 2.85 × longer than wide. Metanepisternal sulcus forming right to gentle obtuse angle, vertical axis reaching the margin of metepisternum. Metaventrite with median sulcus extending > 1/2 of its length. Hind femur ~ 2.45 × longer than wide. Hind tibia, lateral spur ~ 2 × length of median spur. First tarsomere ~ 1.38 × the length of lateral spur and 2.76 × the length of median spur. Abdomen: Pygidium with truncate apex in male, female unknown. Last ventrite almost the same length as ventrite IV, apex truncate in males, females unknown. Male terminalia. Tergite VIII gently emarginate at apex. Median lobe ~ 4.20 × its widest at apical region; dorsal valve 0.75 × wider than long, lateral margins straight, apex subtruncate; ventral valve 1.18 × wider than long. Armature of internal sac, AR with a single, gently curved sclerite on both sides and, acute at each apex. MR with a pair of winding, laminar sclerites, outer margin serrate along its middle apical 0.5 of length; wishbone-shaped sclerite 0.63 as long as the laminar sclerites length, straight, apex gently curved and smooth in lateral view. Tegmen with lateral lobes cleft to 1/11 of their length.
Etymology.
The specific name, an adjective in the nominative case, is Latin for “twice acute”. It refers to the apex of the AR sclerite in the internal sac of male genitalia.
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus).
Host plant.
Fabaceae: Stryphnodendron sp.
. Amblycerus morsei
Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov.
FF8B1728-FE5A-5B7D-AEA2-B755A5FAE490
https://zoobank.org/83E991C8-57CF-49B1-B7D2-F537854B55F1
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in DZUP, male, with labels: Brasil– AM, 80 Km N\ Manaus VI–VIII 1996\ 2°30'S, 60°00'W\ C.W. Dick col. [white label, printed in black]; Larva consumindo semente de Dinizia excelsa [white label, printed in black], Biological Dynamics of\ Forest Fragments Project\ (BDFFP) [white label, printed in black]. HOLOTYPE\ Amblycerus morsei\ Ribeiro-Costa [white label with red margin, printed in black]. Paratypes • (n = 19), same data as holotype, PARATYPE\ Amblycerus morsei\ Ribeiro-Costa [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. Six deposited in DZUP, two in MZSP, two in MNRJ, three in USNM, and six in SDMC.
Diagnosis.
The main character to distinguish Amblycerus morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. from others of the group is the unique strongly curved tooth-shaped sclerite at AR (Fig. 5G). Amblycerus falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov. and A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. share a unique sclerite at AR but their sclerites have projections for both sides (Figs 3F, 4F). However, in A. kingsolveri, A. marinonii, A. sclerolobii, and A. tachigaliae have one pair of sclerites (Figs 6H, 7G, 8F, 10G) and A. manauara has two pairs (Fig. 9F).
Description.
The description of A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. is similar to A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. except by the following characters.
Dimensions: BL: 5.50–6.50 mm (x̄ = 5.89 mm; n = 10); BW: 3.30–3.70 mm (x̄ = 3.49 mm; n = 10).
Integument color: Similar to color variations in A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., some specimens darker or paler but in general keeping the contrast of colors. Antenna with the first two antennomeres reddish brown, the rest dark brown; sometimes entirely dark brown.
Vestiture: Dorsum covered with yellowish pubescence evenly distributed, sometimes near elytral suture with whitish setae. Ventral region with whitish pubescence except abdominal ventrites with yellowish pubescence.
Head: Frontal carina absent, finely punctate or sometimes less punctate on midline. Ocular index 4.54; ocular sinus 0.02 of the eye length in lateral view; postocular lobe 0.03 of the eye length. Prothorax: Pronotum with carina bordering the basal lobe and toward part of laterals; lateral carina ⅔ the length of pronotum. Mesothorax and metathorax: Scutellum ~ 1.5 × longer than wide with tridentate apex, all teeth the same size. Elytron 1.43 × longer than wide, subtruncate apically. Metanepisternal sulcus with the vertical axis reaching the margin of metepisternum, longitudinal axis ~ less or half the length of metepisternum. Hind femur ~ 2.76 × longer than wide. Hind tibia, lateral spur ~ 1.86 × the length of median spur. First tarsomere ~ 1.58 × the length of lateral spur and 2.93 × the length of median spur. Pygidium 1/3 or 1/2 covered by the elytra. Abdomen: Pygidium at apex truncate in males, emarginate in females. Last ventrite longer than ventrite IV, apex without differences between sexes. Male genitalia: Median lobe ~ 3.60 × its widest at apical region; dorsal valve 1.30 × wider than long, subtriangular, lateral margins almost straight, apex rounded ventral valve 1.3 × wider than long, lateral margins almost straight, apex acute; dorsal valve 0.73 × wider than long, subtriangular, lateral margins curved; ventral valve 1.59 × wider than long. Armature of internal sac, AR with one strongly curved tooth-shaped sclerite. MR with a pair of winding, laminar sclerites, outer margin serrate along its middle apical 1/2 length; wishbone-shaped sclerite 0.49 × as long as the laminar sclerites length, straight, apex enlarged and serrated in lateral view. Tegmen with lateral lobes cleft to 1/19 of their length.
Etymology.
The specific name is named in honor of Geoffrey E. Morse for his enthusiasm, dedication, and competence to the study of seed beetles.
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus).
Host plant.
Fabaceae: Dinizia excelsa Ducke.
. Amblycerus sclerolobii
Ribeiro-Costa, 2000
8B57DDB7-4C4D-5EB7-9ABC-6F57DCB62B0C
Amblycerus sclerolobii Ribeiro-Costa, 2000: 328–330 (detailed original description, type locality: Amazonas, Minas Gerais); Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2018: 515 (catalog); Santos and Ribeiro-Costa 2019: 103 (taxonomy); Romero-Nápoles et al. 2021: 209 (catalog).
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in DZUP, male, with labels: Brasil: Minas Gerais, Viçosa; 19-XI-986; G.P.Santos leg., em semente de mamoneira-branca, Sclerolobium sp. Paratypes • (n = 11), eight with the same data as holotype, two paratypes deposited in DZUP, two in MZSP, two in MNRJ, two in USNM • one Brasil: Amazonas, Rio Javari, Estirão do Ecuador; X.1979; M .Alvarenga leg., in CMNH (Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Oakland, Pennsylvaniaand) and • two only with the information 5.X.1936, (EQ 045238), Sclerolobium denudatum, in USNM (Ribeiro-Costa 2000).
Diagnosis.
Amblycerus sclerolobii differs from the others of the group by the armature of the internal sac of male genitalia. The AR has one pair of sclerites (Fig. 6H) (A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov., A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. has one sclerite- Figs 2, 3F, 4F, 5G; A. manauara has two pairs- Fig. 9F), but A. marinonii, A. kingsolveri and A. tachigaliae share with A. sclerolobii one pair (Figs 7G, 8F, 10G). Although A. sclerolobii can be easily separated from these last three species by the serrate winding laminar sclerites at MR (Fig. 6H) (A. kingsolveri, A. marinonii, A. tachigaliae have straight laminar sclerites: Figs 7G, 8F, 10G).
Note.
Ribeiro-Costa (2000) described this species as having the general integument color contrasting with the antennae, thoracic ventrites, and legs. Here we present illustrations of the extremes of this contrast (Fig. 6C, D).
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazonas-Estirão do Equador, Minas Gerais-Viçosa).
Host plants.
Fabaceae: Tachigali denudata (Vogel) Oliveira-Filho, Tachigali sp. (quoted as Sclerolobium denudatum, Sclerolobium sp.).
. Amblycerus kingsolveri
Ribeiro-Costa, 1993
C0A4496D-9EDB-56F8-A117-4A1D23285D6D
Amblycerus kingsolveri Ribeiro-Costa, 1993: 5–8 (detailed original description, type locality: Amazonas); Ribeiro-Costa 2000: 330 (mentioned); Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2018: 509 (catalog); Santos and Ribeiro-Costa 2019: 103 (taxonomy); Romero-Nápoles et al. 2021: 208 (catalog).
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in DZUP, male, with labes: Brasil: Amazonas, Rio Tarumã Mirim, 2Km from Rio Negro, 03°02'S-60°17'W; 30 July 79; Adis, Erwin, Montgomery leg. Paratype • (n = 1), male, Brazil: Amazonas, Manaus, 1941 in DZUP. (Ribeiro-Costa 1993).
Additional material examined.
• [n = 2] Brasil: Amazonas\ Rio Tarumã Mirim\ 20 KM nw Manaus\ 02Mar1979/ 02°53'S, 060°07'W [white label, printed in black]; Montgomery, Erwin,\Schimmel, Krishik, \Date, Bacon Colls [white label, printed in black]; Black water innun-\dation forest canopy\ fogged with pyrethrum\ Sample #39 [white label, printed in black]; Amblycerus\ kingsolveri\ Ribeiro-Costa, C. S. det. 2024 [white label with black margin, handwritten except name of identifier and date printed in black] (USNM).
Diagnosis.
This species is easily recognized by the unique small pair of spine-shaped sclerite at AR of the internal sac of the male (Fig. 7G). The other species in the sclerolobii group have large sclerites with different forms.
Note.
Ribeiro-Costa (1993) described this species as having the general integument color reddish yellow as in Fig. 7A and here we present an illustration of the darker specimens (Fig. 7B).
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus, Rio Tarumã Mirim).
Host plant.
Unknown.
. Amblycerus marinonii
Ribeiro-Costa, 1993
787A4E53-63E5-56C9-8E28-43CC413D98DD
Amblycerus marinonii Ribeiro-Costa, 1993: 8–9 (detailed original description, type locality: Goiás); Ribeiro-Costa 2000: 330 (mentioned); Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2018: 551 (catalog); Santos and Ribeiro-Costa 2019: 103 (taxonomy); Romero-Nápoles et al. 2021: 208 (catalog).
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in DZUP, male, with labels: Brazil: Goiás, Dianópolis; 16-22.I.1962; J. Bechyné leg. (Ribeiro-Costa 1993).
Additional material examined.
• (n = 5) Cuiabá-MT/X/1998\Souza, M.J.M.\pl.hosp.\Sclerolobium\ paniculatum\ var. rubiginosum[white label with black margin, printed in black]; Amblycerus\ marinonii\ Ribeiro-Costa, C. S. det. 2024 [white label with black margin, handwritten except name of identifier and date printed in black] (USNM). New record. • (n = 2) Brazil – Go Barro Alto\ 15°04'23.30"S, 48°59'51.60"W \XI 2009 M. Pimenta & L.L.\ Bergamini cols Malaise[white label with black margin, handwritten except name of identifier and date printed in black]; Chrysomelidae\Bruchinae sp.4 p831\L.L. Bergamini det. 2010 [white label with black margin, printed in black]; Amblycerus\ marinonii\ Ribeiro-Costa, C. S. det. 2024 [white label with black margin, handwritten except name of identifier and date printed in black] (DZUP).
Diagnosis.
Amblycerus marinonii can be distinguished mainly by the presence in the internal sac of male genitalia at AR of one pair of tooth-shaped, large and strongly curved sclerite (Fig. 8F). Although A. marinonii shares one pair of sclerite with A. sclerolobii (Fig. 6H), A. tachigaliae (Fig. 10G), A. marinonii (Fig. 8F) and A. kingsolveri (Fig. 7G) it can be separated by the conspicuous form of the AR sclerites.
Distribution.
Brazil (Mato Grosso-Cuiabá, Goiás-Dianópolis, Barro Alto*).
Host plants.
Fabaceae: Tachigali rubiginosa (Mart. ex Tul.) Oliveira-Filho (quoted as Sclerolobium paniculatum var. rubiginosum).
. Amblycerus manauara
Ribeiro-Costa, 2000
B11C780E-9F2E-59E3-BECB-D1471E000272
Amblycerus manauara Ribeiro-Costa, 2000: 330–332 (detailed original description, type locality: Amazonas), Ribeiro-Costa 2000: 330,331 (mentioned); Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2018: 551 (catalog); Santos and Ribeiro-Costa 2019: 103 (taxonomy); Romero-Nápoles et al. 2021: 208 (catalog).
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in USNM, male, with labels: Brasil: Amazonas: [Uypizanga], Rio Negro, (14 km de Manaus, Alt. 300 pés); XII. 1941; A. Rabaut leg. (Ribeiro-Costa 2000).
Diagnosis.
One of the easiest species to identify in the group sclerolobii is Amblycerus manauara. It has the most conspicuous character in the male genitalia, the two pairs of sclerites at the AR in the male genitalia (Fig. 9F) which separates this species from the others that have one pair (A. kingsolveri, A. marinonii, A. sclerolobii, A. tachigaliae; Figs 7G, 8F, 6H, 10G) or just a single sclerite (A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., A. falcorostrus Ribeiro-Costa & Morse, sp. nov., A. biacutus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov. and A. morsei Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov.; Figs 2A, 3F, 4F, 5G).
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus).
Host plants.
Unknown.
. Amblycerus tachigaliae
Kingsolver, 1976
B59D5F85-E189-5FF0-98C1-AD387EDB83D2
Amblycerus tachigaliae Kingsolver, 1976: 150–151 (detailed original description, type locality: Panama); Kingsolver 1980: 238–239 (mentioned); Johnson and Kingsolver 1981: 410 (checklist); Kitajima and Augspurger 1989: 1105 (distribution, host association, ecology); Udayagiri and Wadhi 1989: 15 (catalog); Romero-Nápoles et al. 2021: 210 (catalog).
Type material.
Holotype • Deposited in USNM, male, with labels: Panama: Barro Colorado I.; feb. 1975; Robin Foster, coll., reared from seeds of Tachigali versicolor Standley & Williams. Paratypes • (n = 2), two same locality, one female; 24-II-1975; T. L. Erwin coll., at light in USNM, one male; 10-III-1961; J. M. Campbell coll., at light, in CNC (Canadian National Collection, Ottawa). (Kingsolver 1976).
This species was recognized based on the original detailed description presented by Kingsolver (1976) where the male genitalia is well illustrated. New record. • (n = 2) Panama: Colón, Santa Rita Ridge 10–11 June 1977, coll. Howden, H. and Howden • (n = 3) Manaus, Brazil\1978 [white label, handwritten]; ♀; collected by\ M.A.S. Serrano [white label, first line printed in black, second handwritten]; Amblycerus tachigaliae\ Kingsolver\ Det. J. Romero N. 91’ (white label, printed in black, first line bold letters); TAMU-ENTO X0102475 (TAMU) [just one with a female label]. As discussed previously, this should be considered provisional and should be confirmed based on the characters presented in the key.
Diagnosis.
Amblycerus tachigaliae has a number of sclerites in the internal sac of male genitalia that distinguish it from the other species of the group sclerolobii (Fig. 10G). It has an extra pair of sclerites at MR, short and denticulate, in addition to the pair of laminar sclerites and unpaired wishbone-shaped sclerites shared by the other species of the group.
Note.
In the original description of A. tachigaliae, Kingsolver (1976) did not mention the pair of sclerites, short and denticulate at MR (Fig. 10G). However, we can identify them in the drawing of male genitalia of Kingsolver (1976) by carefully observing the teeth placed at the same position as these sclerites. We illustrate the extreme contrasts observed in the integument coloration between ventrites of the thorax, legs, and abdomen for A. tachigaliae (Fig. 10C, D).
Distribution.
Panama (Barro Colorado Island, Colón*), Brazil (Amazonas-Manaus*)
Host plant.
Fabaceae: Tachigali versicolor Standl. & L.O. Williams (quoted erroneously as Tachigalia versicolor)
Species excluded from the sclerolobii group
. Amblycerus bicolor
(Pic, 1927)
2D639382-08B6-5BB0-8A8C-012A0708F8B0
Spermophagus bicolor Pic, 1927: 187(original description, distribution).
Amblycerus bicolor : Ribeiro-Costa 1992: 167–168; 172 (redescription, type material, male genitalia); Ribeiro-Costa et al. 2018: 502–503 (catalog); Romero-Nápoles et al. 2021: 207 (catalog).
Type material.
This species was redescribed by Ribeiro-Costa (1992). The single syntype deposited in MNHN (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France), a female, was examined, with the label • “Itaituba, Amazones”; however, we emphasize here that the locality “Itaituba” is in the Para state of Brazil.
Diagnosis.
Amblycerus bicolor can be distinguished by the species of the sclerolobii group and the other Amblycerus species by the scutellum with subacute apex (Fig. 11C), pronotum with elongate coarse punctures on lateral areas (Fig. 11B), prosternal process very narrow, laminar; elytra and pygidium with coarse punctures at apex and the color pattern of integument on the pygidium with two darker oval areas (Fig. 11F). It is worth noting that in the male genitalia the two unpaired sclerites at MR differ, one anterior with denticles and the posterior is long, entire, not wishbone-shaped with separate stems (Fig. 11G).
Distribution.
Brazil (Para), Suriname, French Guiana.
Host plants.
Cassia sp. (Fabaceae).
Revision of Amblycerus species groups
Table 2
Table 2.
List of published Amblycerus species groups with their composition. Note that there is disagreement between authors, but that all published groups other than those reconciled in this paper are included. Abbreviations for distribution: (W) West Indies, (N) North America north of Mexico, (M) Mexico, (C) Central America, (S) South America. (*) species not included in the analysis of Ribeiro-Costa (1995) but placed in the group.
| Amblycerus groups | Species composition | Distribution | Authors of groups |
|---|---|---|---|
| anosignatus | A. anosignatus, A. chiapas, A. guerrerensis | C, M, S | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| canescens | A. canescens, A. teutoniensis | S, M | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| cistelinus | A. atypicus, A. cistelinus, A. guazumicola*, A. jatayensis, A. sosia, A. whiteheadi* | W, N, M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| championi | A. championi, A. evangelinae, A. teutoniensis | W, M, C, S | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| chapadicola | A. chapadicola, A. germaini, A. mourei | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| danunciae | A. danunciae | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| decoris | A. decoris | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| dispar | A. crassipunctatus, A. dispar, A. insuturatus, A. schwarzi, A. taeniopygus, A. goianensis | W, N, M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| epsilon | A. epsilon | M, C, S | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| geminatus | A. geminatus, A. multiflocculus*, A. similaris, A. similis | M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| gounellei | A. gounellei | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| hoffmanseggi | A. hoffmanseggi, A. submaculatus, A. nigromarginatus, A. obscurus | N, M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa and Marinoni (1992) |
| ischiodontus | A. ischiodontus | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| isocalcaratus | A. isocalcaratus | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| luteonotatus | A. luteonotatus | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| luteolineatus | A. luteolineatus | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| marmoratus | A. marmoratus, A. barcenae, A. hespenheidei, A. pictus | M, C | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| megalobus | A. atrogaster, A. championi* , A. megalobus, A. multimaculatus, A. nigronotatus | M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| paulonotatus | A. paulonotatus, A. isabelae, A. spectabilis* | C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| perfectus | A. bidentatus, A. denticulatus, A. perfectus, A. imperfectus | M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| piurae | A. piurae | M, S; introduced into French Polynesia | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| pollens | A. pollens, A. spiniger | C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| pterocarpae | A. pterocarpae, A. luciae | M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| profaupar | A. baracoensis*, A. caymanensis*, A. cerdanicola, A. longesuturalis, A. maculicollis, A. profaupar, A. pusillus, A. scutellaris* | W, N, M, C, S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| reticulatus | A. reticulatus | S | Ribeiro-Costa (1995) |
| robiniae | A. acapulcensis, A. robiniae, A. taeniatus | W, N, M | Kingsolver (1975) |
| robiniae | A. acapulcensis, A. ireriae, A. robiniae | W, N, M | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| sclerolobii | A. sclerolobii, A. kingsolveri, A. marinonii, A. manauara, A. tachigaliae, A. biacutus sp. nov., A. falcorostrus sp. nov., A. morsei sp. nov., A. truncatus sp. nov. | C, S | Here proposed |
| scutellaris | A. atkinsoni, A. baracoensis, A. biolleyi, A. cerdanicola, A. mariae, A. montalvoi, A. pygidialis, A. scutellaris, A. veracruz | W, N, M, C, S | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| spondiae | A. alternatus, A. cuernavacensis, A. spondiae, A. vitis | N, M, C, S | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| stridulator | A. stridulator | M, C, S | Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) |
| virens | A. medialis, A. virens, A. virescens, A. viridans, A. viridis | S | Ribeiro-Costa et al. (1995) |
After recording the Amblycerus species placed in groups by different authors (Kingsolver 1975; Ribeiro-Costa 1995; Ribeiro-Costa and Marinoni 1992; Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996) it was possible to note groups with similar names, and in part with similar species or groups with different names and composed in part or entirely by similar species. Therefore similarities among their species composition justify merging groups. The groups below are merged, keeping the senior name of the group.
cistelinus group (Ribeiro-Costa 1995): A. cistelinus (Gyllenhal, 1833), A. guazumicola Kingsolver & Johnson, 1971, A. jatayensis (Pic, 1902), A. sosia Ribeiro-Costa & Kingsolver, 1993a and A. whiteheadi Kingsolver, 1991. Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) subsequently proposed the group with the same name composed by the shared species A. cistelinus, A. guazumicola and A. sosia. Ribeiro-Costa (1999a) described A. atypicus, Ribeiro-Costa, 1999a and suggested this species probably belonged to this group, confirmed here. Therefore the cistelinus group is composed of six species.
hoffmanseggi group (Ribeiro-Costa and Marinoni 1992): A. hoffmanseggi (Gyllenhal, 1833), A. submaculatus (Pic, 1927), A. nigromarginatus (Motschulsky, 1874), and A. obscurus (Sharp, 1885). Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) subsequently proposed the group obscurus composed of the shared species A. nigromarginatus and A. obscurus: this group is therefore replaced by the previous group name hoffmanseggi.
geminatus group (Ribeiro-Costa 1995): A. geminatus (Sharp, 1885), A. multiflocculus Kingsolver, 1980, A. similaris Ribeiro-Costa, 1999b, and A. similis Ribeiro-Costa, 1999b. Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) subsequently proposed the group multiflocculus composed only of A. multiflocculus, here we merge both these groups and keep the name geminatus due to seniority.
perfectus group (Ribeiro-Costa 1995): A. anosignatus (Chevrolat, 1877), A. bidentatus Ribeiro-Costa, 1999b, A. denticulatus Ribeiro-Costa, 1999b, A. perfectus (Sharp, 1885), A. imperfectus Kingsolver, 1980. Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) subsequently proposed the group with the same name composed only by the shared species A. perfectus. The species A. anosignatus was included in this group probably by an artifact of the methodology used by Ribeiro-Costa (1995). This species differs from the others of the group mainly by the integument color and the absence of teeth surrounding the sclerite complex in the median region of the internal sac of male genitalia (Ribeiro-Costa 1995:33), characters that justify its exclusion from the group. The perfectus group is now composed of four species: A. bidentatus, A. denticulatus, A. perfectus, and A. imperfectus.
pterocarpae group (Ribeiro-Costa 1995): A. pterocarpae Kingsolver, 1980 and A. luciae Ribeiro-Costa, 1999b. Romero-Nápoles et al. (1996) proposed the group with the same name containing only the shared A. pterocarpae.
Although there are other groups which we identify as not having disagreements among their species composition, we consider it premature at this moment to merge them.
robiniae group (Kingsolver 1975) and robiniae group (Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996);
profaupar group (Ribeiro-Costa 1995) and scutellaris group (Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996);
megalobus and canescens groups (Ribeiro-Costa 1995) and championi group (Romero-Nápoles et al. 1996).
Furthermore, there are different conclusions on group membership based on species that do overlap.
A. acapulcensis Kingsolver, 1975 (robiniae groups);
A. baracoensis Kingsolver, 1970 (profaupar and scutellaris groups);
A. cerdanicola Kingsolver, 1970 (profaupar and scutellaris groups);
A. championi (Pic, 1913) (championi and megalobus groups);
A. robiniae (robiniae groups);
A. scutellaris (Sharp, 1885) (profaupar and scutellaris groups) ;
A. teutoniensis (Ribeiro-Costa & Kingsolver, 1993b) (canescens and championi groups).
We therefore suggest a future taxonomic revision or a phylogenetic, morphological and/or molecular studies of the groups to which they belong before reconciling membership between the different groups.
Discussion
We have been focusing on the Brazilian Amblycerus fauna for a long time and with the four more species added here we reach 36 species described by the first author and her collaborators; the total number of Brazilian species encompasses 66 known species and including the new ones of the sclerolobii group we record a total of 70 Brazilian species; certainly many more are to be discovered for this country. All host plants known for this species group belong to the Caesalpinoideae clade of the Fabaceae (Bruneau et al. 2024). The tribes Dimorphandreae, Campsiandreae, and Sclerolobieae are closely related lineages that include nine genera with 140–165 species of trees in Neotropical forests (Bruneau et al. 2024); the Stryphnodendron clade of the tribe Mimoseae is somewhat more distantly related and also includes forest trees in the Neotropics and is composed of seven genera and 56 species (Bruneau et al. 2024). Trees from neotropical wet forests remain undersampled for their seed beetle diversity, especially when compared to the more easily accessible flora of dry deciduous forests and thorn scrub. The results of this study indicate that the species diversity within these four clades could provide significant opportunities to more thoroughly document the diversity of the genus Amblycerus and perhaps particularly the sclerolobii species group.
This revision of the Amblycerus species groups provides a clear view of the current state of knowledge at this intrageneric taxonomic level. At the beginning of this review we listed 37 groups, and in the end, five groups were merged although two still remain with the same name (robiniae group), reduced now to 32 species groups. These groups encompass a total of 96 species of Amblycerus, with 26 species remaining to be studied if we consider a total of 122 currently valid species assigned into this genus.
The characterization of Amblycerus groups and the definitions of their limits have not been a simple task. The entire data set, which reflects the extensive morphological convergence resulting from the constraints of developing within seeds (Smith-Pardo et al. 2024), makes the identification process a challenge at both the group and species levels. Diagnostic characters are not always the same among groups and variations of characters may occur within the same group. In the sclerolobii group, the apically tridentate scutellum is one of the diagnostic characters of the group; however, in A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., the scutellum is truncate, but the characters of the male genitalia of this species place it in this group. Also, the tridentate scutellum appears in other species groups suggesting that they have evolved independently in different lineages, similar to the patterns of colors on the dorsum. The patterns of integument/pubescence on the dorsum of a group is not always congruent with the male genitalia pattern of sclerites in the internal sac, as we found in A. manauara Ribeiro-Costa, 2000 and A. tachigaliae Kingsolver, 1976, but it is possible that the male genitalia pattern of sclerites defines a group as mentioned in A. truncatus Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov., even if we found some variability in the pattern of integument/pubescence.
Herein we have contributed to the formal description of groups and its species with well-illustrated male genitalia and color illustrations of external characters to avoid misidentification. Both contributions of Ribeiro-Costa (1995) and Romero-Nápoles et al (1996) did not include colored images and the second one did not even provide illustrations of the pattern on dorsum. In this paper, we include not only colored images and detailed drawings of male genitalia but comparative characters useful for phylogenetic morphological study or even discussion of results based on molecular data analysis as we agree that all taxonomically proposed groups should be tested through repeatable phylogenetic analyses.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Authors are very grateful to the curators/institutions for loaning specimens, C.S. Ribeiro-Costa especially thanks to A. Konstantinov and E. Roberts (USNM), who kindly cooperated with her bruchine studies, M. Cupello (TAMU) for sending label data of A. tachigaliae, the technicians of the Coleção Entomológica Pe.J.S. Moure (DZUP), in particular to Keli C.C. Morais during the use of DZUP equipment for genitalia drawings, L. Bergamini (IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) for sending label data of A. marinonii and D. Manfio (UTFPR- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná) for collaborating during the first steps to revisit the sclerolobii group since it was proposed in 1995. Finally, we are very grateful to the reviewers and the editor for their careful reading of this article.
Citation
Ribeiro-Costa CS, Morse GE (2025) Circumscription of the sclerolobii group of Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with descriptions of four new species and a revision of the species groups of the genus. In: Chaboo CS, Matsumura Y, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 10. ZooKeys 1252: 35–67. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1252.144951
Funding Statement
G.E. Morse received financial support for this research through a generous gift from David Rockefeller.
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statement
No ethical statement was reported.
Funding
G.E. Morse received financial support for this research through a generous gift from David Rockefeller.
Author contributions
Both authors have contributed equally.
Author ORCIDs
Cibele Stramare Ribeiro-Costa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6527-6460
Geoffrey E. Morse https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8246
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.
References
- Albuquerque FP, Manfio D, Ribeiro-Costa CS. (2014) A contribution to the knowledge of New World Bruchinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae): taxonomic revision of Ctenocolum Kingsolver & Whitehead, with description of five new species. Zootaxa 3838(1): 001–045. 10.11646/zootaxa.3838.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O’Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V. (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1–552. 10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chevrolat LAA. (1877) Les diagnoses de nouvelles espèces de bruchides. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France (5) 7: 89–90, 98–99, 106, 114–115, 125, 134–135.
- Evenhuis NL. (2024) The insect and spider collections of the world website. http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/codens/ [accessed 22 July 2024]
- Gyllenhal L. (1833) Genera et species curculionidum cum synonymia hujus familiae. Vol. 1. Pars 1. Roret, Paris, 381 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Maia VH, Lima HC, Lemes MR, Snak C, Gregório B, Cardoso SRS, Queiroz LP, Zartman CE, Lewis GP, James EK, Dexter KG, Pennington RT, Simon MF, Cardoso D. (2024) A densely sampled molecular phylogeny of Tachigali (Leguminosae), an evolutionarily successful lineage of neotropical ant-housing canopy trees. Brazilian Journal of Botany 47: 1225–1243. 10.1007/s40415-024-01016-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CD. (1983) Ecosystematics of Acanthoscelides (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) of Southern Mexico and Central America. Miscellaneous publications of the Entomological Society of America 56: 1–248. 10.4182/QHJQ6024.56.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CD. (1989) Adaptive radiation of Acanthoscelides in seeds: examples of legume bruchid interactions. In: Stirton CH, Zarucchi JL. (Eds) Advances in Legume Biology.Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis, 747–779.
- Johnson CD. (1990) Systematics of the seed beetle genus Acanthoscelides (Bruchidae) of Northern South America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 116: 297–618. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM. (1971) Descriptions, life histories, and ecology of two new species of bruchid infesting guacima in Mexico. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 44(2): 141–152. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM. (1973) A revision of the genus Sennius of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). United States Departamente of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1462 1–139. 10.22004/ag.econ.171919 [DOI]
- Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM. (1981) Checklist of the Bruchidae (Coleoptera) of Canada, United States, Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. The Coleopterists Bulletin 35(4): 409–422. [Google Scholar]
- Kergoat GJ, Silvain JF. (2004) Le genre Bruchidius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) est-il monophylétique? Apports des méthodes de parcimonie, maximum de vraisemblance et inférence bayésienne. Biosystema 22: 113–125. [Google Scholar]
- Kergoat GJ, Alvarez N, Hossaert-Mckey M, Faure N, Silvain J-F. (2005) Parallel evolution in the two largest New and Old World seed-beetle genera (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Molecular Ecology 14: 4003–4021. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02702.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kergoat GJ, Delobel A, Le Ru B, Silvain JF. (2008) Seed-beetles in the age of the molecule: recent advances on systematics and host-plant association patterns. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M. (Eds) Researches on Chrysomelidae Volume 1.Brill, Leiden, Netherlands, 59–86.
- Kingsolver JM. (1975) Amblycerus acapulcensis, a new species of seed beetle from Mexico (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 65: 33–35. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsolver JM. (1976) A new species of Amblycerus from Panama (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 66: 150–151. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsolver JM. (1980) Eighteen new species of Bruchidae, principally from Costa Rica, with host records and distributional notes (Insecta: Coleoptera). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 93: 229–283. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsolver JM. (1991) A new species of Amblycerus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from Central and South America, with notes on its biology. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 93(2): 433–436. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsolver JM. (2004) Handbook of the Bruchidae of the United States and Canada (Insecta, Coleoptera). United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1912: 1–324. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsolver JM, Whitehead DR. (1974) Classification and comparative biology of the seed beetle genus Caryedes Hummel (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 100(4): 341–436. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25078162 [Google Scholar]
- Kitajima K, Augspurger CK. (1989) Seed and seedling ecology of a monocarpic tropical tree, Tachigali versicolor. Ecology 70: 1102–1114. 10.2307/1941379 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence JF, Beutel RG, Leschen RAB, Ślipiński A. (2010) Glossary of morphological terms. In: Leschen RAB, Beutel RG, Lawrence JF. (Eds) Handbook of Zoology.Vol. 2. Morphology and Systematics (Elateroidea, Bostrichformia, Cucujiformia partim). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 9–20. 10.1515/9783110911213.9 [DOI]
- Manfio D, Ribeiro-Costa CS, Caron E. (2013) Phylogeny and revision of the New World seed-feeding bruchine genus Gibbobruchus Pic (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Invertebrate 27: 1–37. 10.1071/IS11047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Morse G. (2014) Bruchinae Latreille, 1802. In: Leschen ABR, Beutel RG. (Eds) Handbook of Zoology.Volume 3: Morphology and systematics (Chrysomeloidea, Curculionoidea). De Gruyter, Berlin, 189–196.
- Morse GE, Ribeiro-Costa CS. (2024) New and confirmed combinations of new world Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with a list of incertae sedis species. Zootaxa 5543: 057–082. 10.11646/zootaxa.5543.1.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motschulsky V. (1874) Enumération des nouvelles espèces de coléoptères rapportés de ses voyages. Bulletin de la Société Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscou 46(2): 203–252. [Google Scholar]
- Pic M. (1902) Description de Coléoptères Nouveaux. Bruchidae de l’Amérique Méridionale. Naturaliste 24: 172.
- Pic M. (1913) Coleopterorum Catalogus. Pars 55. Bruchidae. Junk W, Berlin, 74 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Pic M. (1927) Nouveaux Coléoptères du Globe. Bulletin de la Société de France 52: 106–110, 185–189.
- Powo (2024) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ [accessed 22 July 2024]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (1992) Gênero Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Grupo “hoffmanseggi”: II. Redescrições, chave e dados biológicos das espécies. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36: 149–175. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (1993) Two new species of Amblycerus Thunberg from Brazil (Coleoptera, Bruchidae), Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 9: 5–9. 10.1590/S0101-81751992000100003 [DOI]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (1995) Análise fenética das espécies brasileiras de Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) com descrição de um novo gênero. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (1997) Descrições de oito novas espécies de Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14: 629–648. 10.1590/S0101-81751997000300013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (1999a) Description of two new species of Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) with a probable stridulatory mechanism. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 101: 337–346. http://biostor.org/reference/55304 [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (1999b) Sete novas espécies de bruquídeos do gênero Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 16(3): 789–806. 10.1590/S0101-81751999000300016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS. (2000) Descrições de sete novas espécies de brasileiras de Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17: 323–338. 10.1590/S0101-81752000000200003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS, Kingsolver JM. (1993a) A new species of Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and a lectotype designation. Insecta Mundi 6(3): 183–187. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS, Kingsolver JM. (1993b) Amblycerus teutoniensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), a new species of seed beetle. Entomological News 104(4): 160–164. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS, Marinoni RC. (1992) Gênero Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Grupo “hoffmanseggi”: I. Taxonomia Numérica. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36(1): 129–47. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS, Vieira MK, Manfio D, Kergoat GJ. (2014) A remarkable new species group of green seed beetles from genus Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae), with description of a new Brazilian species. ZooKeys 401: 31–44. 10.3897/zookeys.401.6232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Costa CS, Manfio D, Morse G. (2018) Catalog for the Brazilian Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) with taxonomic notes, host plants associations and distributional records. Zootaxa 4388: 499–525. 10.11646/zootaxa.4388.4.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romero-Nápoles J, Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM. (1996) Revision of the genus Amblycerus of the United States and Mexico (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Amblycerinae). United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1845: 1–166. [Google Scholar]
- Romero-Nápoles J, Ayers TJ, Johnson CD. (2002) Cladistics, bruchids and host plants: evolutionary interactions in Amblycerus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Acta Zoologica Mexicana 86: 1–16. 10.21829/azm.2002.0862496 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Romero-Nápoles J, Yus-Ramos R, Amador-Mojena P. (2021) Lista comentada de los Brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) de Brasil. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A. ) 68: 203–244. [Google Scholar]
- Santos AT, Ribeiro-Costa CS. (2019) Rearrangements in some species groups of Amblycerus Thunberg, 1815 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) including keys, description of a new species, new host plant and distributional records. Zootaxa 4701(2): 101–148. 10.11646/zootaxa.4701.2.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharp D. (1885) Biologia Centralia Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera, Bruchidae 5: 437–504.
- Smith-Pardo AH, Irons L, Morse GE. (2024) Landmark- and semi-landmark-based geometric morphometrics as a tool for the identification of genera of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) The Coleopterists Bulletin 78(4): 553–566. 10.1649/0010-065X-78.4.553 [DOI]
- Udayagiri S, Wadhi SR. (1989) Catalog of Bruchidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 45: 1–300. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.











