Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1987 Sep 19;295(6600):690–692. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6600.690

Regional neonatal intensive care: bias and benefit.

T G Powell 1, P O Pharoah 1
PMCID: PMC1247727  PMID: 3117304

Abstract

Among very low birthweight infants born to residents of Merseyside in 1979-81 those booked at or transferred in utero to the regional unit were more likely to survive than those born elsewhere in the region. A study was carried out to determine whether the increased survival rate was attributable to better care or differences in the babies treated at the unit, or both. Four subpopulations were defined by district of maternal residence to obtain fairly comparable samples. Survival to 2 years increased as proportions treated at the regional unit increased, this "dose-response" effect being most pronounced among the smallest infants. Despite less favourable social state infants from the district housing the regional unit were apparently in the best condition at birth; had been managed most actively before, at, and after birth; and were the most likely to survive. This increased survival, however, was associated with a marginally significant increase in prevalence of major impairments. These data underline the need for routine surveillance of large representative samples of low birthweight survivors.

Full text

PDF
690

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bakketeig L. S., Hoffman H. J., Sternthal P. M. Obstetric service and perinatal mortality in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1978;77:3–19. doi: 10.3109/00016347809157954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiswick M. L., Davies P., Bate R., Dryburgh E., Gordon-Nesbitt D. Regional organisation of neonatal intensive care in the North-west. Br Med J. 1979 Jul 28;2(6184):247–250. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6184.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eksmyr R., Eklund G. Early neonatal deaths in geographically defined populations with different organization of medical care. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1985 Nov;74(6):848–854. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1985.tb10047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sackett D. L. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):51–63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Usher R. Changing mortality rates with perinatal intensive care and regionalization. Semin Perinatol. 1977 Jul;1(3):309–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES