Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 2025 Aug 25;103(10):582–591. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292682

Water quality and child undernutrition: evidence from 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories

Qualité de l’eau et malnutrition infantile: données issues de 29 pays et territoires à revenu faible ou intermédiaire

Calidad del agua y desnutrición infantil: evidencia de 29 países y territorios de ingresos bajos y medios

جودة المياه وعدم كفاية تغذية الأطفال: أدلة من 29 دولة ومنطقة ذات دخل منخفض ومتوسط

水质与儿童营养不良:从 29 个中低收入国家和地区收集的证据

Качество воды и недоедание среди детей: данные из 29 стран и территорий с низким и средним уровнем дохода

Dung Duc Le a, Long Thanh Giang b,
PMCID: PMC12477515  PMID: 41035557

Abstract

Objective

To determine how Escherichia coli contamination of household water affects the probability of stunting and underweight in children younger than 5 years in 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories.

Methods

We used data describing health, nutrition, education, and water, sanitation and hygiene (i.e. E. coli testing) from the global Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. We conducted multiple linear regression analyses to estimate the effects of E. coli contamination on the growth outcomes of stunting and underweight in children, and to explore the underlying mechanisms. We also conducted subgroup analyses to examine heterogeneous effects at both the macro- and microlevels.

Findings

Three quarters of the children in our pooled sample (26 498/35 012) were living in households with drinking water contaminated with E. coli. We observed that these children had a 2.3 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.006 to 0.039) and 1.8 (95% CI: 0.006 to 0.031) percentage point higher probability of experiencing stunting and underweight, respectively, than children living in households with uncontaminated water. Our heterogeneity analyses revealed significant effects of E. coli contamination in girls and in poorer households (microlevel); in low- and lower-middle-income countries and territories; and in the World Health Organization African Region and Region of the Americas (macrolevel). Finally, we identified diarrhoea as a potential mechanism through which E. coli contamination might adversely affect child growth.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the critical need to eliminate E. coli contamination from household water sources to improve both child health and growth outcomes; changing behaviours related to open defecation remains a key strategy.

Introduction

Child undernutrition remains a critical global health and development challenge. Although substantial progress has been made in improving child nutrition over the past decades, the prevalence of stunting and underweight among children younger than 5 years remains high in low- and middle-income countries.1 Approximately, 149 million children are stunted and 82 million are underweight wordwide.1,2 Early-life undernutrition has detrimental consequences that extend beyond childhood, impairing cognitive development and learning outcomes during childhood, and subsequently reducing economic productivity and earning potential in adulthood.3,4 Leading international organizations have implemented a series of initiatives and commitments aimed at eradicating child undernutrition. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with its specific target of reducing child malnutrition (sustainable development goal (SDG) 2.2), provides a strategic framework to guide these efforts.5

Emerging research highlights the critical role of the housing environment. Researchers hypothesize that children residing in dwellings with inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene conditions are likely exposed to human or animal faeces containing pathogens with harmful effects on child health and development, potentially contributing to the onset and persistence of childhood undernutrition. This hypothesis is supported by the prevalence of insufficient water, sanitation and hygiene coverage in low- and middle-income countries. Specifically, an estimated one quarter of the global population were not able to access managed drinking water in 2022; of this group, approximately 115 million people were dependent on untreated surface water sources.6 Despite these large numbers, several water, sanitation and hygiene programmes in low- and middle-income countries have failed to improve linear growth faltering or other growth outcomes among target children,710 making it difficult for policy-makers to justify the role of water, sanitation and hygiene within multisectoral nutrition programmes. Observational studies have yielded mixed findings,1114 calling for further large-scale research with a focus on the reduction of faecal contamination in the living environment.15

We therefore aim to provide internationally comparable estimates of the extent to which Escherichia coli contamination of water sources relates to the prevalence of child stunting and underweight in 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories. We utilize E. coli testing results at a household level to assess water quality quantitatively, eliminating bias resulting from self-reported improvement in water source or sanitation. We examine the heterogeneous impact of water quality at both the micro- and macrolevel, and explore potential mechanisms through which E. coli contamination can influence the likelihood of child stunting and underweight.

Methods

Data

We used data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS; see also online repository),16 a global standardized household survey designed by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Employing a multistage cluster sampling method, MICS probabilistically selects primary sampling units and then randomly selects households within these units. The survey has been collecting information on a wide range of indicators including health, nutrition, education, child protection, water, sanitation and hygiene, providing a holistic perspective of the well-being of children and women in 118 countries and territories since the mid-1990s. Given the objective of this study, we included all countries and territories that collected data on household water tests and child anthropometry.

To assess faecal contamination, round 6 of MICS incorporated a new module for water quality testing, developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, and which has rigorous quality control measures to ensure test accuracy.17 MICS personnel collected 100 mL water samples from selected households at both the point of use and the point of service delivery, and used enzyme substrate nutrient plates (CompactDry™, Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) and field-based membrane filtration to measure E. coli levels. Laboratory personnel incubated membranes to facilitate E. coli growth, and counted E. coli colonies after 24 hours. Following WHO guidelines, we created a binary indicator for E. coli contamination as determined from a 100 mL water sample (i.e. E. coli detected versus E. coli not detected).18

Child growth outcomes

We used the child growth outcomes of child stunting and underweight; child stunting is defined as a height-for-age Z-score below two standard deviations (SDs), and child underweight is defined as a weight-for-age Z-score below two SDs. We calculated both measures using methods developed for the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study.19

Control variables

Following a published study,20 we identified a comprehensive set of factors associated with child growth outcomes including characteristics of household heads (age, sex and level of education), parents (age and level of education), children (age and sex) and household size. We provide detailed definitions of these variables in the online repository.16 We observed that the correlation between the level of education of the household head and level of education of either parent was relatively low (0.55 for maternal education and 0.65 for paternal education).

Statistical analysis

We analysed all data using Stata version 17.1 (Statacorp, College Station, United States of America), determining statistical significance at the P < 0.05 level.

Descriptive statistics

To describe the study sample, we disaggregated the pooled sample by E. coli contamination status, and conducted independent two-sample t-tests and χ2 tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Multiple linear regression

We used a linear probability model to estimate the relationship between water quality and child growth outcomes, while controlling for other variables. A linear probability model is better suited to handle fixed effects, mitigating the problem of incidental parameters associated with probit models.21 Further, a linear probability model avoids the potential for bias resulting from mis-specified functional form assumptions (e.g. normal or logistic) inherent in probit or logit models. Because our primary objective is to determine the average association between water quality and child stunting and underweight, rather than predict probabilities, the fact that linear probability models can produce predicted probabilities outside the range of 0–1 is not important.21

To mitigate for potential bias, we controlled for multiple levels of fixed effects to account for factors that are common to all individuals, including interviewer, household, primary sampling unit, area of residence (rural versus urban) and administrative regions within individual countries and territories. To capture potential resource allocation disparities between siblings within any household, we also controlled for number of siblings. We clustered standard errors at the household level because this is where each water quality test occurred.22 We used original MICS sampling weights for single-country or territory analyses, but rescaled these sampling weights according to country or territory sample size for pooled data analysis.

Given the potential link between water quality and child health, we also explored whether E. coli contamination might indirectly impact child growth by influencing child health outcomes (or mechanisms). We used three indicators of child health to test this hypothesis: cough; diarrhoea; and fever, which were assessed during the two-week period before the survey was conducted. To establish a potential mediating effect, we examined two conditions: (i) E. coli contamination as a predictor of child health outcomes; and (ii) the subsequent impact of these outcomes on child growth. 

Heterogeneous analysis

To explore potential heterogeneity in the relationship between water quality and child growth outcomes as a result of variations in economic development, household resources and geographic location, we conducted subgroup analyses to identify particularly vulnerable populations. We defined the subgroups at the (i) microlevel: sex of child, household wealth (rich or poor, based on MICS median household wealth index) and whether rural or urban residence; and (ii) macrolevel: World Bank country income classification and WHO region.

Ethics

No ethical considerations were applicable because we used publicly available data.23

Results

Study sample

Our pooled sample for analysis included 35 012 children younger than 5 years. Three quarters of the children (75.7%; 26 498/35 012) were resident in a household in which the drinking water was contaminated with E. coli. Of our total sample, 23.1% (8081/35 012) and 12.8% (4484/35 012) were affected by stunting or were underweight, respectively (Table 1). We observed the largest proportion of children living with contaminated drinking water live in Iraq (12.7%; 3376 children). Without considering water contamination status, the largest proportion of those affected by stunting or underweight lived in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (14.3%, 1158 children) or Chad (16.1%; 721 children), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Children younger than 5 years either living in households with drinking water contaminated by Escherichia coli, stunted or underweight, 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories, 2017–2020.

Country or territory; year of survey, by WHO region Sample size No. (%)
Living in household in which drinking water is contaminated with E. coli (n = 26 498) Affected by stunting
(n = 8081)
Underweight
(n = 4484)
African Region
Algeria; 2018–2019 1921 678 (2.6) 174 (2.2) 49 (1.1)
Central African Republic; 2018–19 814 736 (2.8) 279 (3.5) 143 (3.2)
Chad; 2019 2442 2428 (9.2) 898 (11.1) 721 (16.1)
Democratic Republic of the Congo; 2017–2018 2571 1925 (7.3) 1158 (14.3) 604 (13.5)
Gambia; 2018 1537 1308 (4.9) 321 (4.0) 222 (5.0)
Ghana; 2017–2018 1300 1061 (4.0) 206 (2.5) 145 (3.2)
Guinea-Bissau; 2018–19 1594 1384 (5.2) 437 (5.4) 233 (5.2)
Lesotho; 2018 204 121 (0.5) 62 (0.8) 18 (0.4)
Madagascar; 2018 1718 1621 (6.1) 698 (8.6) 440 (9.8)
Malawi; 2019–2020 1718 1624 (6.1) 583 (7.2) 206 (4.6)
Sao Tome and Principe; 2019 193 86 (0.3) 26 (0.3) 14 (0.3)
Sierra Leone; 2017 1207 1190 (4.5) 331 (4.1) 162 (3.6)
Togo; 2017 172 162 (0.6) 46 (0.6) 24 (0.5)
Zimbabwe; 2019 612 521 (2.0) 137 (1.7) 55 (1.2)
Region of the Americas
Dominican Republic; 2019 752 614 (2.3) 56 (0.7) 27 (0.6)
Guyana; 2019 497 403 (1.5) 58 (0.7) 34 (0.8)
Honduras; 2019 1922 1357 (5.1) 363 (4.5) 137 (3.1)
Suriname; 2018 421 320 (1.2) 31 (0.4) 31 (0.7)
South-East Asia Region
Bangladesh; 2019 2175 1876 (7.1) 600 (7.4) 477 (10.6)
Nepal; 2019 836 768 (2.9) 266 (3.3) 201 (4.5)
Eastern Mediterranean Region
Iraq; 2018 5465 3376 (12.7) 552 (6.8) 157 (3.5)
Occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem; 2019–2020 1105 422 (1.6) 78 (1.0) 9 (0.2)
Tunisia; 2018 180 63 (0.2) 18 (0.2) 3 (0.0)
Western Pacific Region
Fiji; 2021 358 200 (0.8) 24 (0.3) 11 (0.3)
Kiribati; 2018–2019 305 290 (1.1) 39 (0.5) 18 (0.4)
Lao People’s Democratic Republic; 2017 1478 1384 (5.2) 510 (6.3) 309 (6.9)
Mongolia; 2018 954 283 (1.1) 95 (1.2) 22 (0.5)
Samoa; 2019–2020 468 209 (0.8) 32 (0.4) 9 (0.2)
Tuvalu; 2019–2020 93 88 (0.3) 3 (0.0) 3 (0.1)

E. coli: Escherichia coli; WHO: World Health Organization.

Source: Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys.

Among children residing in households in which E. coli was not detected in the drinking water, the prevalence of child stunting and underweight was 13.5% (1148/8514) and 5.8% (493/8514), respectively. These values are statistically significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those measured in households in which E. coli was detected in the drinking water, namely 26.2% (6933/26 498) and 15.1% (3988/26 498), respectively. We observed that adults in households in which E. coli was not detected in the drinking water were statistically significantly (P < 0.001) older and more likely to have a secondary or higher level of education. Households in which E. coli was not detected are more likely to have a male household head and be located in urban areas (Table 2).

Table 2. Characteristics of children younger than 5 years according to Escherichia coli contamination status of household water, 29 low- and middle-income countries or territories, 2017–2020.

Characteristic No. children living in households without or with E. coli contamination (%)a
Difference, % points P
Without (n = 8 514) With (n = 26 498)
Age of child, months (SD) 29.5 (17.1) 29.2 (17.2) 0.3 0.164
No. siblings (SD) 3.1 (2.2) 3.6 (1.8) −0.5 0.000
Age of household head, years (SD) 41.4 (13.2) 40.6 (12.9) 0.8 0.000
No. in household (SD) 6.6 (3.9) 7.3 (4.4) −0.7 0.000
Age of mother, years (SD) 30.3 (7.0) 29.2 (6.6) 1.1 0.000
Stunting 1 148 (13.5) 6 933 (26.2) −12.7 0.000
Underweight 493 (5.8) 3 988 (15.1) −9.3 0.000
Sex of child
Male 4 320 (50.7) 13 344 (50.4) 0.3 0.612
Female 4 194 (49.3) 13 154 (49.6) −0.3 0.542
Sex of household head
Male 7 572 (88.9) 22 969 (86.7) 2.2 0.000
Female 942 (11.1) 3 529 (13.3) −2.2 0.000
Education level of household head
None 1 092 (12.8) 7 622 (28.8) −16.0 0.000
Primary 2 031 (23.9) 8 691 (32.8) −8.9 0.000
Secondary 2 328 (27.3) 6 046 (22.8) 4.5 0.000
Higher 3 063 (36.0) 4 139 (15.6) 20.4 0.000
Education level of mother
None 989 (11.6) 8 095 (30.5) −18.9 0.000
Primary 1 994 (23.4) 8 342 (31.5) −8.1 0.000
Secondary 2 298 (27.0) 6 447 (24.3) 2.7 0.000
Higher 3 233 (38.0) 3 614 (13.6) 24.4 0.000
Education level of father
None 626 (7.4) 5 286 (20.0) −12.6 0.000
Primary 1 765 (20.7) 7 416 (28.0) −7.3 0.000
Secondary 2 338 (27.5) 6 082 (23.0) 4.5 0.000
Higher 3 785 (44.5) 7 714 (29.0) 15.5 0.000
Residence
Urban 5 332 (62.6) 7 968 (30.1) 32.5 0.000
Rural 3 182 (37.4) 18 530 (69.9) −32.6 0.000

E. coli: Escherichia coli; SD: standard deviation.

a No. (%) presented if not otherwise indicated.

Multiple linear regression

We found that children living in households with E. coli-contaminated drinking water had a 2.3 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.006 to 0.039) and 1.8 (95% CI: 0.006 to 0.031) percentage point higher probability of experiencing child stunting and underweight, respectively, relative to children in households with uncontaminated water, holding other factors constant (Table 3). The regression results also revealed similarities in and differences between the determinants of stunting and underweight. Specifically, while age and sex of child, birth order and maternal education were found significantly associated with both outcomes, age and education of household head, along with maternal age, were significant predictors of stunting but not underweight (Table 3).

Table 3. Relationships between child or household characteristics and growth outcomes in children younger than 5 years, 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories, 2017–2020.

Characteristic Probability, % (95% CI)
Stunting Underweight
E. coli contamination 2.3 (0.6 to 3.9) 1.8 (0.6 to 3.1)
Age of child, months 0.2 (0.2 to 0.2) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1)
Sex of child
Male Reference Reference
Female −2.7 (−4.2 to −1.3) −1.5 (−2.5 to −0.5)
Birth order 0.5 (0.1 to 1.0) 0.4 (0.1 to 0.7)
Age of household head, years −0.1 (−0.1 to −0.0) −0.0 (−0.1 to 0.0)
Sex of household head
Female Reference Reference
Male −0.6 (−2.5 to 1.4) 0.5 (−1.4 to 2.3)
Education level of household head
None Reference Reference
Primary −0.2 (−4.0 to 1.0) 0.4 (−1.7 to 2.1)
Secondary −3.3 (−6.4 to −0.3) −1.3 (−3.6 to 1.0)
Higher −4.8 (−7.6 to −2.1) −2.2 (−4.8 to 0.5)
Household size 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.3) 0.0 (−0.2 to 0.2)
Age of mother, years −0.2 (−0.4 to −0.1) −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.0)
Education level of mother
None Reference Reference
Primary −4.5 (−7.4 to −1.5) −2.9 (−4.6 to −1.1)
Secondary −5.1 (−8.4 to −1.9) −3.4 (−5.2 to −1.7)
Higher −7.7 (−10.8 to −4.6) −4.3 (−6.2 to −2.4)
Education level of father
None Reference Reference
Primary −2.0 (−6.1 to 2.0) −2.1 (−4.4 to 0.1)
Secondary −1.7 (−5.7 to 2.2) −1.5 (−4.0 to 1.1)
Higher −1.8 (−5.2 to 1.6) −1.4 (−3.8 to 0.9)

CI: confidence interval; E. coli: Escherichia coli * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Multiple linear regression analyses for mechanisms, with child health outcomes as dependent variables and controlling for individual characteristics and fixed effects, revealed that E. coli contamination was significantly associated only with the probability of having diarrhoea (1.4; 95% CI: 0.001 to 2.8; Table 4). We subsequently included the diarrhoea variable as an explanatory variable in the main linear regression models with the child growth indicators as outcomes. We observed that diarrhoea significantly predicted child underweight (2.8; 95% CI: 1.4 to 4.3), but its effect on child stunting was not significant (0.8; 95% CI: −0.8 to 2.4; Table 5).

Table 4. Relationships between child or household characteristics and health outcomes in children younger than 5 years, 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories, 2017–2020.

Characteristic Probability, % (95% CI)
Cough Diarrhoea Fever
E. coli contamination 1.5 (−0.4 to 3.4) 1.4 (0.1 to 2.8) 1.03 (−1.1 to 3.1)
Age of child, months −0.1 (−0.1 to −0.1) −0.2 (−0.3 to −0.2) −0.8 (−0.1 to −0.0)
Sex of child
Male Reference Reference Reference
Female −1.0 (−2.6 to 0.6) −0.2 (−1.3 to 0.9) −2.1 (−3.4 to −0.9)
Birth order −0.8 (−1.2 to −0.3) 0.1 (−0.2 to 0.3) −0.2 (−0.6 to 0.2)
Age of household head, years −0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.0 (−0.0 to 0.1) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1)
Sex of household head
Female Reference Reference Reference
Male −0.6 (−2.6 to 1.5) −0.8 (−2.4 to 0.8) 0.2 (−1.8 to 2.2)
Education level of household head
None Reference  Reference  Reference
Primary −0.5 (−3.4 to 2.4) 1.2 (−0.8 to 3.2) −0.1 (−2.6 to 2.4)
Secondary −2.2 (−5.3 to 0.9) 2.2 (0.2 to 4.2) −0.2 (−3.0 to 2.7)
Higher −1.1 (−5.2 to 2.9) 0.0 (−2.6 to 2.6) −0.2 (−3.7 to 3.3)
Household size 0.1 (−0.2 to 0.3) −0.0 (−0.3 to 0.2) −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.2)
Age of mother, years 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.2) −0.1 (−0.2 to −0.1) −0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1)
Education level of mother
None Reference  Reference  Reference 
Primary 2.2 (−0.1 to 4.5) 0.6 (−1.3 to 2.5) 2.3 (−0.6 to 5.2)
Secondary 0.7 (−2.5 to 3.8) −0.7 (−2.8 to 1.3) 0.4 (−2.3 to 3.0)
Higher −2.2 (−5.6 to 1.1) −1.4 (−3.4 to 0.7) −1.5 (−4.6 to 1.6)
Education level of father
None Reference  Reference  Reference 
Primary 2.1 (−0.6 to 4.8) −0.3 (−2.1 to 1.6) 1.7 (−1.5 to 4.8)
Secondary 3.9 (0.7 to 7.0) −1.1 (−3.5 to 1.4) −0.9 (−3.6 to 1.7)
Higher 3.0 (0.7 to 5.3) −0.8 (−2.7 to 1.1) −0.3 (−2.7 to 2.0)

CI: confidence interval; E. coli: Escherichia coli.

Table 5. Relationships between child or household characteristics and growth outcomes in children younger than 5 years, when controlling for the health outcome of diarrhoea, 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories, 2017–2020.

Characteristic Probability, % (95% CI)
Stunting Underweight
E. coli contamination 2.3 (0.6 to 3.9) 1.8 (0.5 to 3.1)
Diarrhoea 0.8 (−0.8 to 2.4) 2.8 (1.4 to 4.3)
Age of child, months 0.2 (0.2 to 0.2) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.1)
Sex of child
Male Reference Reference
Female −2.7 (−4.2 to −1.3) −1.5 (−2.5 to −0.5)
Birth order 0.5 (0.1 to 1.0) 3.4 (0.1 to 0.7)
Age of household head, years −0.1 (−0.1 to −0.0) −0.0 (−0.1 to 0.0)
Sex of household head
Female Reference Reference
Male −0.6 (−2.5 to 1.4) 0.5 (−1.4 to 2.3)
Education level of household head
None Reference Reference 
Primary −1.5 (−4.0 to 1.0) 0.1 (−1.8 to 2.0)
Secondary −3.4 (−6.4 to −0.3) −1.4 (−3.7 to 1.0)
Higher −4.8 (−7.6 to −2.1) −2.2 (−4.8 to 0.5)
Household size 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.3) 0.0 (−0.2 to 0.2)
Age of mother, years −0.2 (−0.4 to −0.1) −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.0)
Education level of mother
None Reference  Reference 
Primary −4.5 (−7.4 to −1.5) −2.9 (−4.6 to −1.2)
Secondary −5.1 (−8.4 to −1.9) −3.4 (−5.1 to −1.7)
Higher −7.7 (−10.8 to −4.6) −4.3 (−6.1 to −2.4)
Education level of father
None Reference  Reference 
Primary −2.0 (−6.1 to 2.0) −2.1 (−4.4 to 0.1)
Secondary −1.7 (−5.7 to 2.2) −1.4 (−4.0 to 1.2)
Higher −1.8 (−5.1 to 1.6) −1.4 (−3.7 to 0.9)

CI: confidence interval; E. coli: Escherichia coli.

Single-country analysis

The results of a single-country or -territory analysis, available in the online repository,16 show that the main contributors to the negative effect of E. coli contamination on child stunting estimated from the pooled analysis were Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Sierra Leone, Suriname and Zimbabwe. Similarly, the main contributors to the overall negative effect of E. coli contamination on child underweight were Central African Republic, Ghana, Guyana, Kiribati, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Sao Tome and Principe, and Zimbabwe.

Heterogeneous analysis

From our subgroup microlevel analyses, we observed that E. coli contamination had a strong and significant association with stunting and underweight among girls and children from less affluent households, but no significant associations were observed for boys or children from wealthier households. The impact of E. coli contamination on child growth outcomes was found to be similar in rural and urban areas (Table 6).

Table 6. Heterogeneous associations of E. coli contamination on the probability of stunting or underweight in children younger than 5 years, 29 low- and middle-income countries and territories, 2017–2020.

Variable No. (n = 35 012) Probability, % (95% CI)
Stunting Underweight
Microlevel variable
Sex of child
  Male 17 664 1.2 (−0.7 to 3.1) 1.1 (−0.4 to 2.6)
  Female 17 348 3.1 (1.5 to 4.7) 3.2 (1.8 to 4.7)
Household wealth
  Rich 17 356 1.0 (−0.7 to 2.7) 1.0 (−0.6 to 2.7)
  Poor 17 656 3.1 (0.7 to 5.6) 3.5 (1.8 to 5.2)
Residence
  Urban 13 300 3.3 (0.5 to 6.1) 1.6 (0.1 to 3.2)
  Rural 21 712 3.2 (1.6 to 4.9) 3.1 (1.5 to 4.7)
Macrolevel variable
Country or territory income level
  Low 14 241 4.1 (0.9 to 7.4) 3.3 (0.4 to 6.2)
  Lower-middle 15 775 2.9 (0.6 to 5.2) 2.1 (0.6 to 3.6)
  Upper-middle 4 996 2.2 (−0.6 to 5.1) 1.5 (−0.6 to 3.5)
WHO region
  African Region 18 003 2.6 (−0.1 to 5.3) 2.9 (0.5 to 5.2)
  Region of the Americas 3 592 5.6 (1.5 to 9.7) −0.0 (−3.2 to 3.1)
  South-East Asia Region 3 011 3.3 (−8.5 to 15.0) −2.2 (−13.7 to 9.4)
  Eastern Mediterranean Region 6 750 3.2 (−3.3 to 9.7) 1.4 (−1.9 to 4.7)
  Western Pacific Region 3 656 −2.3 (−6.8 to 2.3) 3.2 (−0.1 to 6.5)

CI: confidence interval; E. coli: Escherichia coli; MICS: Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey; WHO: World Health Organization.

From our subgroup macrolevel analyses, we observed a significant association between E. coli contamination and stunting and underweight among children in low- and lower-middle-income countries or territories, but no significant effect in upper-middle-income countries. We observed significant associations of E. coli contamination with child stunting in the Region of the Americas (increased probability of 5.6 percentage points; 95% CI: 1.5 to 9.7; Table 6). Our results also show that the effect of E. coli contamination on the probability of underweight was significant in the WHO African Region (increased by 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI: 0.5 to 5.2; Table 6). These heterogeneous results are in accordance with those from our single-country or -territory analysis.

Discussion

Widely recognized as a human right, access to safe drinking water is a key target of the sustainable development goals (SDG 6.1).24 Although investments in water, sanitation and hygiene practices are generally considered crucial for improving child health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, studies have yielded mixed results regarding the effects of water, sanitation and hygiene practices on child growth outcomes. Our investigation of the extent to which the presence of E. coli in household drinking water influences the prevalence of child stunting and underweight has yielded three main findings.

First, our pooled analysis showed that children residing in households with E. coli contamination had a higher probability of experiencing child stunting and underweight compared with those in households without E. coli contamination. This result is in contrast to previous single-country studies conducted in Nepal and India with similar objectives;25,26 however, these studies were not nationally representative, focused on specific provinces and had relatively small sample sizes. Medical research has documented the association between environmental enteric dysfunction and child growth.710,15 Caused by repeated faecal contamination (e.g. E. coli), environmental enteric dysfunction can increase intestinal permeability, leading to reduced nutrient absorption and potential height deficits even without overt diarrhoea or illness. To support this argument, a recent study found a significant association between the presence of E. coli in stool samples of children younger than 5 years and child growth outcomes.27

Second, we observed that the negative impact of E. coli contamination on child growth was mainly driven by its effects on girls, children from less wealthy households, children residing in low- and lower-middle-income countries, and children residing in the WHO African Region and Region of the Americas. A preference for sons, one of the most persistent gender issues in many societies (particularly in low- and middle-income countries), may partially explain the observed disparity between boys and girls. Previous studies have shown that such a preference may affect the allocation of limited household resources such as breastmilk, vitamins, vaccination, protein and health care.2830 Poverty, a lack of safe drinking water and adequate sanitation, and child growth failure are interconnected. Open defecation is common in many parts of the world, notably in Africa and Asia, which increases the risk of E. coli contamination of water sources.31 Poor water quality is also a common issue for health-care facilities in low- and middle-income countries, posing a significant infection risk to both patients and personnel.32 Therefore, water, sanitation and hygiene practices in health facilities are seen as critical for accelerated progress on maternal and newborn health.32

In the WHO African Region, high levels of poverty, widespread open defecation, underdeveloped infrastructure for safe water and sanitation, and inadequate health-care systems are persistent barriers.6 In contrast, countries within the Region of the Americas have achieved broader coverage of basic water, sanitation and hygiene services, especially in urban areas. However, stark inequalities persist, with large gaps in income, education and access to good-quality health care.33 Reports have indicated that regions with a high prevalence of child growth failure also exhibit the lowest levels of access to adequate water, sanitation and hygiene services.1,6

Third, our finding that diarrhoea serves as a potential pathway through which E. coli contamination in water sources may adversely affect child growth complements a recent study. This study, using data from demographic and health surveys across 28 countries, showed that open defecation practices accounted for more than half of the variation in average child height between countries.31 Diarrhoeal diseases are typically transmitted through the faecal-oral route; our additional analysis shows that open defecation is positively and significantly associated with the probability of detecting E. coli in the water (see online data repository).16 Poor water, sanitation and hygiene practices increase an individual’s exposure to faecal pathogens through various pathways including water sources, flies, food and soil, among others.34 Diarrhoea is a leading cause of undernutrition among children younger than 5 years, contributing to more than one third of all child mortality cases associated with undernutrition.34,35 According to UNICEF, over 90% of deaths from diarrhoeal illnesses in young children can be attributed to unsafe or inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene practices.35

Our study had several strengths. First, by using the results from E. coli testing, conducted according to standardized protocols, our measure of water contamination was quantitative and objective. Second, by pooling data from 29 countries and territories across five WHO regions, our findings are more generalizable than single-country studies. Third, by exploring the potential mechanisms through which E. coli contamination influences the likelihood of child stunting or underweight, our findings may be of interest to policy-makers.

Our study also had some limitations. First, although we controlled for a comprehensive set of individual and household characteristics and various fixed effects, variable bias remains a potential concern and prevents any causal inferences. Second, although we acknowledged that there may be water, sanitation and hygiene and malnutrition interventions being implemented in the countries or territories studied, we were not able to consider such interventions. We therefore interpreted our findings as upper bounds of the association of E. coli contamination with child growth. Third, the small sample sizes from some of our study countries or territory may have contributed to imprecision in our estimates. Finally, our data structure did not permit the inclusion of country-level factors, such as economic and climate volatility, which might influence water quality and child growth.

Despite these limitations, our findings highlight the critical need to eliminate E. coli contamination from household water sources to improve both child health and growth outcomes; changing social norms and behaviours related to open defecation remains a key strategy. The disproportionately negative impacts of E. coli contamination on girls, children from poor households and children from low-income countries highlights the need for targeted interventions. To maximize impact, policy-makers should integrate water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, such as household water treatment, improved sanitation to eliminate open defecation and hygiene education, with nutrition-focused strategies, including micronutrient supplementation, promotion of safe food preparation and breastfeeding support.

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

  • 1.Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates: key findings of the 2023 edition. New York and Geneva: United Nations Children’s Fund and World Bank and World Health Organization; 2023. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/368038 [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 2.Underweight among children under 5 years of age (number in thousands) (model-based estimates). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-jme-underweight-numbers-(in-millions) [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 3.Prendergast AJ, Humphrey JH. The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014. Nov;34(4):250–65. 10.1179/2046905514Y.0000000158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sudfeld CR, McCoy DC, Danaei G, Fink G, Ezzati M, Andrews KG, et al. Linear growth and child development in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015. May;135(5):e1266–75. 10.1542/peds.2014-3111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Target SDG. 2.2 malnutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/sdg-target-2_2-malnutrition [cited 2025 Jul 17]. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2020: five years into the SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization; New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030848 [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 7.Humphrey JH, Mbuya MNN, Ntozini R, Moulton LH, Stoltzfus RJ, Tavengwa NV, et al. ; Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) Trial Team. Independent and combined effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene, and improved complementary feeding, on child stunting and anaemia in rural Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. Jan;7(1):e132–47. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30374-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Null C, Stewart CP, Pickering AJ, Dentz HN, Arnold BF, Arnold CD, et al. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018. Mar;6(3):e316–29. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30005-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Luby SP, Rahman M, Arnold BF, Unicomb L, Ashraf S, Winch PJ, et al. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018. Mar;6(3):e302–15. 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stewart CP, Kariger P, Fernald L, Pickering AJ, Arnold CD, Arnold BF, et al. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Kenya (WASH Benefits Kenya): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018. Apr;2(4):269–80. 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30025-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mzumara B, Bwembya P, Halwiindi H, Mugode R, Banda J. Factors associated with stunting among children below five years of age in Zambia: evidence from the 2014 Zambia demographic and health survey. BMC Nutr. 2018. Dec 20;4(1):51. 10.1186/s40795-018-0260-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fink G, Günther I, Hill K. The effect of water and sanitation on child health: evidence from the demographic and health surveys 1986-2007. Int J Epidemiol. 2011. Oct;40(5):1196–204. 10.1093/ije/dyr102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bekele T, Rahman B, Rawstorne P. The effect of access to water, sanitation and handwashing facilities on child growth indicators: evidence from the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. PLoS One. 2020. Sep 22;15(9):e0239313. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Torlesse H, Cronin AA, Sebayang SK, Nandy R. Determinants of stunting in Indonesian children: evidence from a cross-sectional survey indicate a prominent role for the water, sanitation and hygiene sector in stunting reduction. BMC Public Health. 2016. Jul 29;16(1):669. 10.1186/s12889-016-3339-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pickering AJ, Null C, Winch PJ, Mangwadu G, Arnold BF, Prendergast AJ, et al. The WASH Benefits and SHINE trials: interpretation of WASH intervention effects on linear growth and diarrhoea. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. Aug;7(8):e1139–46. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30268-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Le DD, Giang LT. Water quality and child undernutrition: evidence from 29 low- and middle-income countries. Supplementary material [data repository]. London: figshare; 2025. Available from: [cited 2025 Jul 21]. 10.6084/m9.figshare.29575241 [DOI]
  • 17.Water quality. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2018. Available from: https://mics.unicef.org/methodological-work/water-quality [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 18.Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Fourth edition, incorporating the first addendum. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/254637 [cited 2025 Jul 15]. [PubMed]
  • 19.WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006. Apr;450:38–46. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02374.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Z, Kim R, Vollmer S, Subramanian SV. Factors associated with child stunting, wasting, and underweight in 35 low- and middle-income countries. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. Apr 1;3(4):e203386. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM. When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Q J Econ. 2022;138(1):1–35. 10.1093/qje/qjac038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys [website]. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2025. Available from: https://mics.unicef.org/surveys [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 24.Progress on drinking water (SDG Target 6.1). New York: United Nations; 2025. Available from: https://sdg6data.org/en/indicator/6.1.1 [cited 2025 Jul 17].
  • 25.Johri M, Sylvestre MP, Koné GK, Chandra D, Subramanian SV. Effects of improved drinking water quality on early childhood growth in rural Uttar Pradesh, India: A propensity-score analysis. PLoS One. 2019. Jan 8;14(1):e0209054. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shrestha A, Six J, Dahal D, Marks S, Meierhofer R. Association of nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene practices with children’s nutritional status, intestinal parasitic infections and diarrhoea in rural Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020. Aug 15;20(1):1241. 10.1186/s12889-020-09302-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Das R, Palit P, Haque MA, Ahmed T, Faruque ASG. Association between pathogenic variants of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and growth in children under 5 years of age in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022. Jun 6;107(1):72–81. 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Le K, Nguyen M. Son preference and health disparities in developing countries. SSM Popul Health. 2022. Jan 26;17:101036. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jayachandran S, Kuziemko I. Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. Q J Econ. 2011;126(3):1485–538. 10.1093/qje/qjr029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barcellos SH, Carvalho LS, Lleras-Muney A. Child gender and parental investments in India: are boys and girls treated differently? Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2014. Jan 1;6(1):157–89. 10.1257/app.6.1.157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spears D. Exposure to open defecation can account for the Indian enigma of child height. J Dev Econ. 2020. Sep;146:102277. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Almost 2 billion people depend on health care facilities without basic water services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-almost-2-billion-people-depend-on-health-care-facilities-without-basic-water-services-who-unicef [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 33.Social Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean; 2020. Available from: https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/type/social-panorama-latin-america-and-caribbean [cited 2025 Jul 15].
  • 34.Mills JE, Cumming O. The impact of water, sanitation and hygeine on key health and social outcomes: review of evidence. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and UKAID. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2016. Available from: https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-07/WASHEvidencePaper_HighRes_01.23.17_0.pdf [cited 2025 Jul 15]. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nutrition-WASH Toolkit – Guide for practical joint actions. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Children’s Fund East Asia and Pacific Regional Office; 2016. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/1181/file/Nutrition-WASH%20Toolkit%20%E2%80%93%20Guide%20for%20Practical%20Joint%20Actions%20.pdf [cited 2025 Jul 21].

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES