Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1987 Oct 17;295(6604):989–991. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6604.989

Reviewing RAWP. Is the medical service increment for teaching (SIFT) adequate?

G Bevan 1
PMCID: PMC1248028  PMID: 3119133

Abstract

One issue of interest to the current review of the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) formula is the extra service costs associated with medical teaching. RAWP intended the medical service increment for teaching (SIFT) to cover these costs. Although it is not possible to assess from the methods used to derive the SIFT rate whether it is or is not overgenerous for its intended purpose, the "excellence" elements of teaching hospitals tend to be protected. The financial problems of the teaching hospitals are more likely to be due to the relatively high use of services by local residents. But cutting services of London teaching hospitals to bring this use down to equitable levels may impair their capacity to train medical students.

Full text

PDF
989

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bevan G., Brazier J. Financial incentives of subregional RAWP. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Oct 3;295(6602):836–838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6602.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES