Skip to main content
Molecular Neurodegeneration logoLink to Molecular Neurodegeneration
. 2025 Sep 29;20:101. doi: 10.1186/s13024-025-00898-x

Making tracks: microglia and the extracellular matrix

Lauren K Wareham 1, David J Calkins 1,
PMCID: PMC12481997  PMID: 41024112

Abstract

Microglia are resident immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS) and critical regulators of neural homeostasis, mediating immune surveillance, synaptic remodeling, debris clearance, and inflammatory signaling. Emerging evidence highlights the extracellular matrix (ECM) as important to microglial behavior in both physiological and pathological contexts. The CNS ECM is a dynamic and bioactive scaffold composed of three primary compartments: interstitial matrix, basement membranes at neurovascular and neuroepithelial interfaces, and perineuronal nets (PNNs). Each compartment exhibits distinct molecular architectures, ranging from fibrillar collagens and glycoproteins in basement membranes to chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and hyaluronan-rich structures in PNNs. In this review we examine how microglia engage with and reshape the ECM to dynamically respond to disruptions in homeostasis with aging and disease. We discuss the concept of the microglial–ECM “interactome”, which may represent a molecular interface through which microglia sense, modify, and respond to their extracellular environment. This interactome enables microglia to enact fine-scale ECM remodeling during routine surveillance, as well as large-scale alterations under pathological conditions to help preserve function and motility. In aging and disease, dysregulation of the microglial-ECM interactome is characterized by aberrant mechanotransduction, elevated proteinase activity, remodeling of the ECM, and sustained pro-inflammatory cytokine release. These pathological changes compromise ECM integrity, challenge microglial activity, and contribute to progressive neurovascular and synaptic dysfunction. Deciphering the molecular mechanisms underpinning microglial–ECM interactions is essential for understanding region-specific vulnerability in neurodegeneration and may reveal new therapeutic targets for preserving ECM structure and countering CNS disorders.

Keywords: Extracellular matrix, Microglia, Neurodegeneration, Cell motility, Mechanotransduction, Biomechanics, Blood-brain barrier

Background

Microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes comprise the family of cells in the central nervous system (CNS) known historically as neuroglia, so named because of their early depictions as adhesive connectors between neurons [1, 2]. While understanding of their rich and diverse functional contributions to the CNS has improved vastly, the name for these cells (or at least the glia part of it) has stuck, so to speak. Since their recognition as a distinct cell type just over a century ago [3], for several reasons, microglia have stood out among the three, while astrocytes and oligodendrocytes comprise what we call macroglia. Microglia are morphologically complex and multifaceted glia cells with a broad functional repertoire. Microglia are the innate immune cells of the CNS, with important roles in classical immune surveillance and response to insult or disease. Microglia actively survey for danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), e.g., cells undergoing apoptosis, accumulations of cytotoxic or neurotoxic signals, or reactive oxygen species [4].

As resident macrophages in the CNS microglia are behind the blood-brain barrier helping detect injury, cellular debris, and invasive pathogens within the neuronal-vascular microenvironment [5]. Microglia are sensitive to minute perturbations in homeostasis, necessary for fine tuning the local milieu yet potent purveyors of pathology should their activity become unbalanced. Impairment of microglia’s innate autophagic capacity can either lead to or accelerate neurodegenerative progression, as can an overabundance of microglial-derived proinflammatory signaling following infiltration of the blood-brain-barrier by peripheral immune cells [6]. Here we discuss the role of microglial interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM) in both maintaining homeostasis during health and driving pathogenic changes with aging or disease. The ECM is not an inert extracellular substance, but a dynamic landscape with important functions in the CNS. We explore how microglia may interact with the ECM to facilitate their integral functions.

Main text

Microglia: helping to shape the central nervous system milieu

Microglia’s active role in CNS neuronal, vascular, and ECM remodeling spans development, when they are lowest in number but the most mobile, to injury, disease, and senescence [7, 8]. Microglia are neither bone marrow-derived nor replenished from the blood supply but rather are self-renewing through a tightly regulated cycle of spatial and temporal coupling of proliferation and apoptosis, which keeps their number relatively constant following development through normal maturation and aging, despite turning over several times during the lifetime [9]. Microglia are the workhorses of the CNS, active from early development through senescence, and can shift between metabolic programs (oxidative phosphorylation versus aerobic glycolysis) in response to stress and demand [10, 11]. Microglial functions, from development to disease, have been reviewed heavily and we refer the reader to Table 1 for a selection of recent literature.

Table 1.

Additional comprehensive reviews of microglial functions CNS during development, health homeostasis, and disease and degeneration

Focus Reference Title Key Points
Development Barry-Carroll and Gomez-Nicola, 2024 The molecular determinants of microglial developmental dynamics

- Migration of microglia progenitors takes place in the vasculature

- Microglial distribution across the brain is influenced by regional levels of IL-34 and CSF1

- Compared to the adult brain, embryonic and postnatal microglia display a larger capacity to proliferate

Mehl et al., 2022 Microglia in brain development and regeneration

- Tissue microenvironments drive chromatin modifications that impact transcriptional regulation of microglial phenotype

- Microglial heterogeneity is defined by CNS region and age

- Microglial crosstalk with multiple cell types including neurons, oligodendrocyte precursors, astrocytes, and blood vessels highlights broad spectrum of roles in CNS homeostasis

Health and Homeostasis Kent and Miron, 2024 Microglia regulation of central nervous system myelin health and regeneration

- Microglia undergo significant transcriptional changes during demyelination and remyelination

- Microglia are required to regulate myelin during homeostasis

- Aging, peripheral factors such as inflammation and exercise, and cellular interactions influence microglial actions during homeostasis

Pereira-Iglesias et al., 2025 Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses - Proposes a new conceptual framework distinguishing between two potential mechanisms of synapse elimination by microglia: culling and scavenging
Disease and Degeneration Gao et al., 2023 Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets

- Microglia exhibit both protective and detrimental roles in the CNS

- Dysregulation of microglia may cause impaired phagocytosis of pathological deposits or their increased deposition, neuroinflammation, and microglial phenotype switching driving neurodegeneration

- Dysfunctional microglia may also promote the clearance of synapses and ECM such as perineuronal nets

- Microglial dysfunction is distinct across different neurodegenerative diseases

Bartels et al., 2020 Microglia modulate neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases

- Healthy communication between microglia and neurons is important in homeostasis; disruptions in this crosstalk can lead to persistent synaptic and neuronal dysfunction contributing to degeneration

- Understanding and modulating interactions between microglia and neurons is crucial for the development of effective therapies

Microglia help shape the neuronal and axonal milieu in the developing CNS [12]. For example, microglia directly impact developmental myelination of axons by phagocytosis of immature oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs), stopping their maturation and thereby regulating the formation of myelin [13]. At the other end of the life cycle, in the aging brain, where demyelination thins white matter tracts, activated microglia release factors including the hormone IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor-1) that suppress OPC differentiation to impede remyelination [14]. During demyelination, microglia express genes relating to chemoattraction, complement, and phagocytosis, as in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [15, 16]. Following demyelination, the ECM can become enriched with molecules like fibronectin and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), which actively inhibit the recruitment and differentiation of OPCs. During remyelination, microglia create an environment conducive to OPC responsiveness, secreting regenerative factors that help reshape the landscape of the local ECM [17]. Microglia release matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), enzymes that break down these inhibitory molecules, as well as transglutaminases, creating a more permissive environment for OPCs to migrate into the lesion and mature into myelin-producing cells [1820]. Microglial motility and phagocytosis are important not only in the development and maintenance of CNS neuronal connections, but for clearing cellular debris after tissue damage as well. By interacting with both astrocytes and pre- and post-synaptic neuronal membranes, microglia refine connections not only during CNS development [2125], but in maintaining adult homeostasis [13, 2628], and in neurodegenerative disease [6, 2934].

Microglia are well-known for helping to mediate synaptogenesis during development. This process may be necessary for refinement of functional circuits; when microglial engulfment of synaptic proteins is altered, circuits form improperly [23, 24], though emerging evidence suggests otherwise [35]. Microglial-mediated synapse elimination is activity-dependent, with less active neurons preferentially targeted [27]. In their role as dynamic sculptors of neuronal circuits, microglia also modulate functional and structural synaptic plasticity in the adult brain and respond rapidly to changes in neuronal activity to help regulate circuits, including those in the hippocampus involved in learning and memory [3639]. Homeostatic microglia dynamically interact with neuronal synapses to sense and regulate neural activity, such as in long-term potentiation and long-term depression, mechanisms underlying learning and memory [40]. Microglia modulate synaptic plasticity by physical interactions as well as through the release of soluble factors, including neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [41, 42], complement factors [43], and interleukins such as IL-33 [41]. IL-33 instructs microglia to directly engulf components of the perisynaptic ECM to promote the formation of dendritic spines, which are crucial for synaptic plasticity and memory formation [41]. Microglia also contribute to memory consolidation by facilitating the stabilization of memory-associated synapses. However, excessive or abnormal microglial activity in this process can also lead to the elimination of synapses, potentially contributing to forgetting or memory loss such as that observed in Alzheimer’s disease [44]. The highly dynamic but persistent monitoring of the extracellular milieu by microglia uniquely positions them to respond to the rapid changes that occur in the synaptic microenvironment of neuronal networks [45].

The term ‘microglial pruning’ is typically used and suggests that the refining of synapses is a microglial-driven tagging and phagocytotic process; however, direct evidence of this particular process is scarce [46]. Two novel mechanisms of synapse elimination have been proposed and more effectively describe synaptic refinement by microglia: synaptic culling, whereby microglia migrate to directly sever the neuronal plasma membrane, and scavenging, whereby synaptic pruning is primarily neuronal driven, and microglia migrate to phagocytose the remaining debris [46]. In response to localized tissue injury, this process can involve both motility of microglial processes and frank migration of cell bodies [47]. Elimination of unwanted synapses during development versus cleanup of cellular debris following tissue damage represent independent phagocytic processes carried out by microglia [47, 48]. The complement system, part of the innate immune response, is important in recognizing and eliminating pathogens and damaged cells [49]. In the context of synaptic pruning, the complement factors C1q, and C3, and the integrin-associated protein CD47 which interacts with complement receptors such as SIRPα, are integral to process motility associated with synaptic refinement [5053]. C1q and C3 bind to specific synapses, marking them for removal by microglia [54].

The dynamic microglial cell

As resident macrophages, microglia interact with all other cell types in the CNS (including components of the microvasculature) in a highly dynamic and motile way that involves not only changes in location through migration, but in the morphology of individual cells [55]. Such changes are often looped into the broader concept of activation [56]. Long thought to exist in either of two distinct states, quiescent (or even dormant), in the homeostatic environment, but quickly transitioning to reactive in response to insult or disease, microglia are highly vigilant sentinels. In fact, microglia can occupy a range of states that reflect structural, functional, molecular, transcriptomic, and proteomic changes that can vary across brain regions and over time. These include rapid changes in morphology, gene expression, and physiology that reflects their constant surveillance of their immediate environment [57, 58]. Even the idea of quiescence in the context of microglia is a bit of misnomer, reflecting a specific neurochemical and transcriptional state that can best be described as what it is not, i.e., immune activated, but in no way implying lack of activity [57]. Quite the contrary, as microglia exist in a constant state of surveillance, polling their immediate microenvironment for factors that challenge normal physiological function: protein aggregates, antigens, microbes, unneeded or underutilized synapses, and of course, apoptotic or necrotic cells [59]. This role is both facilitated and characterized by a uniquely dynamic morphological phenotype, in which ramifying processes vacillate between protrusion and retraction over even large distances, with morphology and mobility that reflect the degree and quality of insult or stimulation [55, 59].

Microglia are well-tuned to sense an environment dominated by neuronal cells and their messenger molecules, extending their processes spontaneously during basal surveillance or through more directed motion in response to disease- or age-induced challenges to homeostasis [60, 61]. During the state of surveillance in normal tissue, microglial bodies and primary branches are quite stable, while higher-order ramified processes undergo rapid extension and retraction over seconds and minutes [62]. Microglia become increasingly mobile in disease or injury, as they sense and respond to a variety of molecular and mechanical signaling cues [6366]. In response to the release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) from focal trauma or tissue damage, microglia processes converge on the site of injury to envelop damaged tissue while retracting from the opposing direction; this reorganization can occur even without abject cell body migration [62], similar to synapse elimination [62, 67]. In contrast, in pathological conditions endemic to disease, microglia adopt an ameboid morphology to migrate over longer distances to phagocytize cellular debris [68]. This process is akin to macrophage phagocytosis during peripheral tissue damage [69]. In yet another process leading to engulfment of debris without cell body migration, microglia extend processes independently to form phagocytic compartments or pouches [68]. In this instance unoccupied microglial processes are able to continue surveillance of the surrounding tissue while engulfment and phagocytosis occur simultaneously in another compartment [68].

As microglia extend processes to monitor and respond to cues from nearby cells, they do not do so in a vacuum, but through interactions with large areas of ECM, the composition of which helps define by the local environmental niche [70, 71]. Such selective and directional tuning of morphological changes in microglial processes implies spatially (and temporally) coordinated manipulation of the ECM, which is a dynamic landscape under constant breakdown and reconstruction by cells, including microglia [72]. Typically, ECM remodeling is considered at the multi-cellular level, for spatially determined regions of whole tissue. For example, in development, ECM remodeling is necessary for cellular specification and organ morphogenesis, and mutations in ECM components cause widespread and often embryonically lethal tissue abnormalities [73]. As another example, in tumor metastasis, ECM remodeling in distant organs arises from biochemical modifications of tumor-associated ECM induced by stromal cells to support progression [74]. The changes exerted by and influencing the motility of individual microglial processes, by comparison, are extraordinarily focal, just a fraction of the small diameter of the diameter of the cell body (typically, 3–6 μm; [75]).

The ECM, once considered an inert tissue scaffold, is now recognized as a biologically active substrate with roles in cell signaling, cell motility, and tissue infrastructure [7678]. It is comprised of an array of proteins that include proteoglycans, laminins, tenascins, glycosaminoglycans, and of course collagen [72, 76]. In the brain, ECM can be partitioned into three structural types based on general organization and protein composition: diffuse interstitial and perisynaptic, condensed in perineuronal nets (PNNs), and basement membranes at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and meninges and choroid plexus (Fig. 1) [79, 80]. Microglia are integral to both the development and maintenance of each ECM type, directly impacting the cells that reside within the ECM structures themselves in both health and disease [26, 29, 30, 41]. For example, consider PNNs, which are molecular scaffolds that stabilize and regulate mature synapses [72]. PNNs encapsulate the cell soma, dendrites, and axon initial segment and help to restrict synaptic plasticity, particularly in pathways exhibiting developmental activity-dependent plasticity such as the visual system [81]. PNNs are also implicated in the regulation of activity at tripartite synapses, which comprise an astrocyte process interacting with a presynaptic terminal and postsynaptic neuron [82]. In the homeostatic brain, basal regulation of PNN formation is mediated by microglial activity; PNNs dramatically increase in healthy adult brain after microglial depletion (Fig. 2) [26, 29, 30]. In contrast, degradation of the PNN by microglia that accompanies aging, cognitive decline, and neurodegenerative disease, is generally associated with increased microglial activation and secretion of ECM-degrading enzymes [8387], which directly impacts the neurons and astrocytes within the PNN scaffold (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Structural and Molecular Organization of Brain ECM Compartments. Schematic highlighting the three major extracellular matrix domains in the brain. (A) The interstitial matrix (i.e., diffuse), composed of fibrillar collagens (e.g., collagen I), fibronectin, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, tenascin-C, and elastin, provides structural support between cells. (B) Basement membranes, situated at neuroepithelial and vascular interfaces, contain collagen IV, laminins, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (e.g., perlecan, agrin), nidogen, and entactin, supporting barrier function and cellular anchorage. (C) Perineuronal nets (PNNs; i.e., condensed), which ensheath neurons, are enriched in collagen XIX, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (e.g., aggrecan, brevican), hyaluronan, tenascin-R, and link proteins, contributing to synaptic stability and plasticity. Integrin-mediated interactions anchor cells to ECM components, orchestrating signaling and structural integrity

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Microglial-ECM Interactome in Health and Aging/Disease. Schematic illustrating the bidirectional interactions between microglia and distinct ECM compartments—vascular, neuronal (including perineuronal nets), and interstitial ECM under homeostatic conditions (left) and during aging or disease (right). In health, microglia contribute to controlled ECM remodeling, synaptic pruning, and myelin maintenance via ATP, glutamate, and chemokines such as CCL4. In pathological states, altered mechanotransduction (e.g., Piezo activation), reduced formation of focal adhesion complexes (FACs) or expression of FAC components, leads to elevated MMPs, ROS, and pro-inflammatory cytokines disrupting ECM integrity. These events ultimately lead to synaptic loss, neuroinflammation, and impaired repair processes driving degeneration

The BBB is essential for maintenance of immune privilege in the CNS, forming a physical barrier that separates the parenchyma from the blood stream [88]. Together with endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes, and the collagenous basement membrane, microglia help form a selectively permeable membrane through their maintenance of BBB ECM [89, 90]. Microglia are key regulators of CNS vascular development and its maintenance [91]; many remain perivascular cells, acting as the first line of defense for the CNS [90]. Brain injuries such as those exhibited after electrode placement trigger microvascular rupture and BBB leakage, suggesting that immediate diffusion gradients of molecules, sugars, proteins, and other components from the blood into tissue trigger microglia motility over periods that stretch from a few hours to days [92, 93]. By responding to signaling molecules that are derived from vascular endothelial cells and are BBB-permeable (like the chemokine CCL5 or RANTES), microglial migration to damaged vessels first initiates increases in the tight junction protein claudin-5 in an apparent attempt to bolster the BBB, thereby protecting the CNS milieu (Fig. 2) [94]. However, as BBB permeability increases, depositing molecules foreign to the CNS, such as albumin, immunoglobulins (IgG/IgM/IgA), fibrinogen, complement, and red blood cells, into the neuronal milieu, microglial migration is accelerated [9497]. Microglia quickly switch course to releasing pro-inflammatory molecules and degradative enzymes targeted to the ECM that in turn breaks down astrocyte end feet connections and further degrades BBB integrity [98].

Drivers of microglial motility in the matrix

The carefully orchestrated movements that microglia execute allow interaction with synapses, neurons, and of course astrocyte glia in response to a variety of molecular cues that vary with the type of stress induced [50, 99]. There are a variety of environmental stimuli that microglia may respond to for facilitating motility (Table 2) [100]. These stimuli include diffusible chemical cues such as cytokines and growth factors (chemotaxis; [101]), cues bound to a substrate such as the ECM such as the Rho family of small GTP-binding proteins (haptotaxis; [102]), differential ECM compliance such as changes in stiffness of the ECM or stiffness gradients (durotaxis; [103]), geometric properties of a migration substrate such as alignment of collagen fibers (topotaxis; [104]), and ionic differences generated by biological barriers such as an electrical potential gradient (galvanotaxis; [105]). Since microglia are motile in different ways, they may utilize multiple environmental cues -especially in comparing whole cell migration vs. extension and contraction of processes.

Table 2.

Overview of key signaling pathways regulating microglial motility, including environmental cues, mechanosensitive receptors, adhesion molecules, and chemotactic signals involved in both homeostasis and disease

Category Key Pathways/Molecules Function in Microglial Motility
Mechanosensation PIEZO1 channels - Microglia sense changes in tissue stiffness → Ca²⁺ influx → modulates migration and cytokine release
Focal Adhesion and ECM Integrins, ECM components (e.g., CSPGs, Laminin) - Anchors microglia to ECM, helping to transmits mechanical forces, enables traction of microglia for movement
Purinergic Signaling P2Y12, P2 × 4, P2 × 7 - Detect extracellular ATP → guides directed movement
Cytokine & Chemokine Receptors TREM2, CD33, CX3CR1, CCL2/CCR2, CCL5, IL-3R, IL-33/ST2 - Mediate chemotaxis, especially in inflammation and disease
Neurotransmitter Signaling Glutamate, ATP

- Drives migration and process motility via synaptic and injury signals

- Microglia exhibit motility responses to extracellular glutamate, especially in neurodegenerative disease contexts

- Ca2+ signaling through ion channels (often in response to neurotransmitters or mechanical cues) influences process extension and migration

Migration towards (or away) from a variety of environmental cues is integral to many biological processes, including in wound healing by fibroblasts and epithelial cells [106], neutrophil migration [107], including migration by microglia [108]. Cell migration is a highly coordinated and tightly controlled process requiring changes in cell morphology and interactions with the ECM [109]. Microglia must be able to not only sense or detect initiating cues that induce mobility but also interact with and restructure the ECM to promote migration of their cell bodies and/or reorganization of their processes [108]. Microglia respond to the dynamic CNS environment through the expression of a rich variety of cell surface receptors, which collectively comprise the microglial “sensome” [4, 110]. Migration, which is a form of directed motility, depends upon focal adhesion complexes. These are integrin-containing protein structures that help anchor intracellular filaments in cells (including microglia) to the ECM [111]. Migration is executed through a cycle that can be broken down into four discreet steps: 1) protrusion of the leading edge of the cell, 2) cell adhesion to the ECM, 3) generation of traction stresses against adhesion complexes, and finally, 4) release of rear adhesions and cell body contraction [112114]. The speed and direction at which cells migrate is modulated through adhesion complex formation and the density and mechanical compliance of the ECM, a process that may involve integration with the filamentous actin (F-actin) cytoskeleton, protein tyrosine phosphorylation and myosin-generated forces [113, 115117].

For migration to occur, microglia must exert forces on their environment, which requires sensing mechanical properties like tissue stiffness, which is determined in large part by ECM. Increased stiffness enhances both microglial morphological complexity and their release of inflammatory mediators; in vitro, microglia migrate towards stiffer substrates [118]. Mechanosensitive receptors enable microglia to detect alterations in the biomechanical properties of surrounding cells and tissues [119122]. For example, the expression of PIEZO1 and TRPV4, both mechanosensitive cation channels, modulate microglia migration and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by sensing gradients in tissue stiffness through a Ca2+-dependent process [120, 121, 123].

Microglial mechanosensation is also important in disease. Vascular calcifications comprise one of the pathological hallmarks of a wide range of diseases triggering microglial migration and inflammation [124]. It is possible that microglial function is critical to vascular calcification, as they appear to sense and degrade calcifications, possibly through changes in biomechanics of vessel tissue [124]. In Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, excessive extracellular accumulation of proteins such as Aβ, hyperphosphorylated tau, and α-synuclein occur before significant cognitive decline [125]. During progression of Alzheimer’s, Aβ forms aggregates as its structure changes, evolving from amyloid fibrils to formation of insoluble plaques [4]. Although not typically regarded as ECM proteins, accumulations of Aβ and tau in the extracellular space interact with ECM as a substrate, thereby altering the structure of the ECM itself [126130]. With extracellular accumulation, alterations occur in the biomechanical forces between protein, ECM, and points of cell-surface contact. The role of microglia in detecting amyloid and aiding in its clearance is conflicting, with emerging evidence suggesting microglia are fundamental to reshaping amyloid plaques later in the disease [131, 132]. The distinct physical features of amyloid plaques include high rigidity, which may trigger microglial mechanosensing of the plaque as a foreign body, thus promoting migration and activation [133]. This migration likely occurs through PIEZO1 channels [134], possibly directed toward a chemotactic signal formed by apolipoprotein E (ApoE) associated with amyloid plaques and the cell surface adhesion molecule VCAM1 [135138].

Microglial motility through the ECM very likely involves sensing local cellular signaling and neuronal activity. Receptors expressed by microglia detect changes in chemokines and cytokines, purinergic molecules, inorganic substances, as well as changes in pH and amino acids [110, 139]. For example, in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), astrocytes demonstrating a proinflammatory phenotype are influenced directly by chemokine-mediated signaling in microglia [140]. Blood-derived signals can influence both microglia and astrocytes through commonly expressed receptors, such as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, while microglia and astrocytes influence the inflammatory status of the other through release of cytokines such as TNFα (tumor necrosis factor) and interleukins [141].

In glioblastoma, an aggressive form of astrocytic cancer, microglia are the most abundant population of primary immune cells, accounting for up to 50% of total glioblastoma tumor mass [142]. Microglial migration and infiltration in glioblastoma is driven by glioma expression of the chemoattractant CCL2 [143]. A key mechanism driving microglial invasion in glioblastoma are changes in cellular contractility and biomechanics [144]. Microglial migration in glioblastoma depends heavily on binding to fibrous proteins in the ECM including glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), and laminin, as well as extracellular Ca2+ and glutamate [145]. A high concentration of extracellular glutamate can lead to degeneration of neurons, carving a path through the ECM for glioblastoma cells to migrate [146148]. Interestingly, in vitro microglial cells exhibit strong migratory responses to extracellular glutamate [149]. Could neuronal release of glutamate in a dysregulated fashion play a mechanistic role in CNS microglial migration? Possibly. Accumulation of glutamate in the neuronal synaptic cleft has long been argued a driving force of neurodegeneration in age-related CNS diseases [150]. Such accumulations (e.g., due to neuronal hyperexcitation, uptake and transport dysfunction, or release of glutamate from astrocytes exposed to Aβ or α-synuclein oligomers) may trigger migration of microglia or motility of their processes.

Microglia express additional mechanisms that likely contribute to both motility and remodeling of their processes in the ECM. In homeostasis and disease, neuronal excitation itself alters neuron-microglia interactions by affecting microglial process extension and motility [151153]. Like neurons and astrocytes (and, to a lesser degree, oligodendrocytes), microglia express a variety of ion channels that contribute to chemotaxis along concentration gradients, migration, phagocytosis, and inflammatory signaling [154, 155]. In basal conditions, microglia respond to neuronal activity by sensing neurotransmitter and extracellular ions, leading to changes in their resting membrane potential [139]. These signals include changes in concentration of ATP and glutamate [139, 149, 156, 157]. In fact, ATP is one of the most characterized microglial motility and chemotactic cues; it is released by neurons, microglia and other cells in the CNS [158, 159]. The detection of extracellular ATP and subsequent chemotaxis are mediated by the purinergic Gi-protein-coupled receptor P2Y12 and ATP-gated ion channel receptors P2X4 and P2X7 [62, 67, 160, 161].

Microglial migration is also impacted by biomechanical changes to tissue. In glaucoma, a disease that causes degeneration of the optic nerve, forces exerted by intraocular pressure at the optic nerve head as it adjoins the eye alter its biomechanical properties in part through changes in ECM deposition [162164]. Coincidentally or not, microglia are often the “first responders” at the nerve head in glaucoma. Their activation and migration to this critical location may be driven in part by mechanosensitive changes in the ECM that promote chemotaxis to the area of stress through microglial expression of P2X4 and P2X7 receptors [165, 166]. In a mouse model of retinal degeneration, microglial phenotype and the control of vascular architecture depends on tissue stiffness and is regulated by signaling through integrins, which are ECM receptor binding proteins [167].

Gradients of migratory molecules in the ECM and alterations in tissue biomechanics both play a role in the initiation and speed of microglial cell migration. Each of these migratory triggers is in some way linked with the ECM. The ECM binds to a variety of molecules, including growth factors and chemokines, creating concentration gradients that guide cellular behavior [168]. The structure and composition of this matrix can influence how effectively these molecules diffuse and how accessible they are to microglial receptors [168]. Specific ECM components, such as proteoglycans and polysaccharides, determine the size of the extracellular space and thus regulate the diffusion of molecules [169]. For instance, a high concentration of negatively charged CSPGs can create a dense matrix that hinders the movement of molecules and migration of cells [170]. Similarly, the high negative charge of PNNs allows them to bind ions and signaling molecules such as growth factors [171].

Inflammatory mediators such as chemokines, cytokines, and reactive oxygen species can be sequestered by binding to the ECM and contribute to overall directed motility and chemotaxis of microglia towards amyloid deposits in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and multiple sclerosis [172]. Microglia sense and respond to paracrine signals like ligands or other soluble molecules but also have the capacity to function in an autocrine fashion [158, 173, 174]. Important receptor axes specifically involved in chemotaxis of microglia include P2Y, TREM2, CD33, IL-3/IL-3R, IL-33/ST2, CCL2/CCR2, CX3CR1, CCL5, and integrins [4, 94, 159]175– [177]. Interestingly, low intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation increases the velocity at which microglia travel toward electrode-induced injury; an effect thought to be mediated by activation of mechanosensitive channels, or amplified release of cellular components known to increase migration such as ATP [93].

The microglia-ECM “interactome” and neurodegenerative disease

The ECM is a central player in the interplay between extracellular signaling and microglial migration and motility [41, 72, 73, 79, 108, 109, 178]. The ECM in the healthy CNS undergoes dynamic turnover through a highly regulated system of proteases and their inhibitors [179]. Turnover is important in many homeostatic functions of the CNS, including synaptic remodeling, which is in part mediated by microglial phagocytosis of ECM that is triggered by neuronal-derived interleukin 33 (IL-33; [180]). In disease, however, regulation of ECM turnover is disrupted, in part due to the activity of microglia [179]. ECM degradation in neural tissue is accompanied by high levels of extracellular proteases, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and degradation and remodeling of the perivascular and perineuronal ECM [179]. Such actions lead to over-pruning of neuronal synapses and increased inflammation associated with neurodegeneration [181, 182].

After sensing environmental cues to migrate, microglia initiate contact with their surroundings, primarily through the expression of integrin receptors. The type of contact microglia make with ECM components is influenced by extracellular cytokines such as TNFα and the immune-derived interferons IFN-α and IFN-γ, which in turn upregulate the expression of ECM receptor binding proteins including integrins [183185]. Upregulation of integrins promotes the interaction between microglia and the ECM through the formation of the focal adhesion complex [185]. The ECM itself functions as a medium for the sequestration of not only cell signaling molecules such as glutamate, but also divalent metal ions such as calcium (Ca2+), zinc (Zn2+), and magnesium (Mg2+) [186]. In areas outside of the CNS divalent metals directly impact cancer cell migration by acting as gradient-forming agents, associating with GAGs, and enhancing integrin activation in the ECM [187]. In vascular endothelial cells and neurons, manganese (Mn2+) acts as a potent integrin activator, inducing the formation of focal adhesion complexes [188, 189].

Interestingly, microglia release proteases and phagocytize proteins in a feed-forward cascade of tissue-damaging events that accelerate ECM restructuring. Such alterations can include changes in ECM biomechanics that directly impact microglial function, which in turn may promote excessive ECM degradation and eventually impact neuronal survival. For example, altering the ECM impedes microglial-mediated synaptic remodeling by preventing the deposition of complement proteins, leading to impaired expression of the microglial sensome [172, 190]. In multiple sclerosis, lesions of demyelination also contain large numbers of microglial cells linked to ECM dysregulation [191]. In glioblastoma, microglia may drive ECM changes that promote tumor growth and invasion. Microglia migrate to and invade glioblastoma masses, in turn modifying ECM composition through MMPs and cathepsins [76, 144, 192]. These enzymes produce fragments of ECM proteins with new biological activities (called “matrikins”) that influence glioma cell behavior [192]. High levels of ECM proteins including collagen I, collagen IV, laminin and fibronectin are routinely found in glioblastoma tissue, and elevated collagen IV correlates with poorer prognosis [193].

Just as the sensome comprises the collective of cell-surface receptors through which microglia detect changes in the CNS microenvironment [110], we propose the “interactome” as the molecular machinery microglia employ to interact with and manipulate the ECM. If the sensome is the “afferent” system microglia employ to gather information about their immediate environment, the interactome is the “efferent” system through which they act upon their environment. Through the interactome, microglia can create small modifications of the ECM necessary for homeostatic surveillance and more dramatic adaptive behaviors necessitated by challenges to homeostasis. The interactome is dependent on the environmental niche in which microglia reside; for example, vascular basement membrane-associated microglia will have an ECM-interactome that is different to microglia associated with PNNs at neuronal synapses. The interactome is dynamic, influenced by changes in surrounding cells and molecular signals, dictating how microglia respond to changes with aging and in disease.

The cellular consequences of the interactome are vast in homeostasis and disease. In healthy conditions, the interactome of microglia within their various spatial niches is balanced, enabling microglia to carry out their executive functions in a controlled manner (Fig. 2). However, even slight changes in ECM composition and structure have downstream effects on the biomechanical properties of the matrix, the formation of focal adhesion complexes, release of matrikins from the ECM, and the exposure of binding sites and chemokines for cell motility and inflammatory signaling [76, 178, 194]. Such changes in the microglial-ECM interactome trigger an imbalance and can ultimately promote a cascade of pro-degenerative events. For example, an imbalance between collagen and elastin in the ECM leads to stiffening of vascular tissue with age, the cause of which is unknown [195]. The downstream effects of tissue stiffening on the interactome can be hypothetically mapped out: vascular stiffening alters the biomechanical properties of the tissue sensed by microglia through PIEZO channels [196]. Microglial stiffness sensing leads to a downstream cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokine and MMP release, leading to increased degradation of the ECM in a feed-forward cycle (Fig. 2). Such degradation of the ECM promotes the release of bioactive matrikins and also creates space within the ECM for microglial migration.

There is growing evidence of brain ECM changes in human disease; cerebrospinal levels of MMPs-2 and − 7 are associated with brain amyloid deposition and the severity of white matter lesions [197]. Similarly, microglia in close proximity to neurons maintain synapses in a process of culling or scavenging during homeostatic conditions. However, with aging and in disease, dysfunctional neuronal activity can lead to accumulations of excess glutamate and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS). Glutamate receptors on microglia (e.g., AMPA receptors) accumulate at focal adhesion sites where they may indirectly mediate interactions between the ECM and integrins [198]. Such changes in the ECM interactome of microglia triggers the upregulated release of MMPs and other proteases which directly impact the local ECM milieu facilitating microglial motility [199] and increased (i.e., uncontrolled) synaptic pruning. Other cell types within the CNS have the capacity to alter the ECM environment, for example, astrocytes are a primary producer of many ECM proteins including glycoproteins and collagen [76, 200]. Changes in astrocyte-derived ECM composition can also trigger so called “activation of microglia”, potentiating degenerative processes.

A hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases is the patterned spread of degeneration, either confined within a specific brain region or disseminating across multiple areas over time. For example, in glaucoma, degeneration progresses in an arcuate-like pattern over time, mimicking the spatial profile of the retinal vasculature and axon bundles in the retina [201]. These characteristic degenerative patterns are common across patients, yet the mechanisms driving these spatially distinct patterns are elusive.

Microglia interact with neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes; astrocytes form interconnected networks via gap junctions, while neurons couple to one another and to astrocytes [202]. As might be gleaned from their broad distribution across the brain, microglia are a heterogeneous community with subpopulations based on specific brain regions; each population possesses unique transcriptional and functional features [58, 203]. However, despite this heterogeneity, alterations in the microglial-ECM interactome could have far-reaching consequences. If microglia communicate over larger distances, such as is evident in astrocytes of the optic nerve [204], local changes could propagate via interactions with the ECM, thereby creating a domino effect and spreading dysregulation across brain regions.

Conclusions

Microglia represent a morphologically complex and heterogeneous community with subpopulations that vary across specific brain regions. This complexity is reflected in their broad functional repertoire, which includes not only critical roles in immune surveillance and response to insult or stress, but also in developmental synaptogenesis and in modulating synaptic plasticity in the adult brain in response to changes in neuronal activity. Microglia are self-renewing through spatial and temporal coupling of proliferation and apoptosis, which keeps their number relatively constant through normal maturation and aging. As the innate immune cells of the CNS, microglia are not only behind the blood-brain barrier (BBB) where they aid in detection of injury, cellular debris, and invasive pathogens, but aid in its development and maintenance along with endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes [89, 90]. Microglia are also important regulators of vascular health [91], with many remaining perivascular cells throughout adulthood [90].

Microglia constantly survey their microenvironment for challenges to normal physiological function [55, 59]. In this role, microglia are highly sensitive to even minute perturbations in homeostasis, which requires complex interactions with the ECM. These include dynamic morphological reorganization with carefully orchestrated movements of their processes to support interactions with synapses, neurons, and astrocytes in response to molecular stress cues [50, 99]. This reorganization implies coordinated manipulation of the ECM by microglia [72], to promote migration of their cell bodies and/or reorganization of their processes [108]. This in turn involves sensing mechanical ECM-mediated properties like tissue stiffness, which influences both microglial complexity and capacity to detect additional alterations of tissues [119122]. Microglia express a variety of ion channels that contribute to chemotaxis along concentration gradients, migration, phagocytosis, and inflammatory signaling [154, 155]. Gradients of migratory molecules that bind to the ECM help determine the speed of microglia migration, including growth factors and chemokines [168].

The ECM in the CNS undergoes remodeling through a finely regulated system of proteases and their inhibitors [179], which is in part mediated by microglial phagocytosis. In disease, however, regulation of ECM turnover is disrupted, in part due to the activity of microglia [179], which release proteases and phagocytize proteins to accelerate ECM restructuring. Such alterations directly impact microglial function, through a variety of cell-surface receptors [110]. This highlights the potential impact of the ECM-interactome on neurodegenerative disease progression. Perturbations in this interactome - whether due to aging or pathology - can initiate a cascade of maladaptive changes to the ECM in the brain. For example, an initial insult (such as increased amyloid deposition, as in Alzheimer’s disease) trigger changes in local tissue biomechanics, initiating changes in the microglial interactome causing excessive MMP release and ECM degradation. These changes, in turn, may further disrupt neighboring microglia interactomes, creating a spatially perpetuating cycle that ultimately leads to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration.

This raises several pressing questions: do microglia secrete specific signaling molecules to transmit interactome changes across their network? Are microglial responses primarily governed by ECM dynamics, or modulated through interactions with other glia and neuronal cell types? Do changes in tissue biomechanics, including ECM biomechanics, alter microglial migration? And critically, are cellular changes to microglia that are mediated by the interactome reversible? A key unresolved question is how the extracellular milieu impacts microglial communication as a coordinated, functional network.

Answering these and similar questions will require experimental approaches using complementary in vivo and in vitro systems. For example, hydrogel-based ECM stiffness assays, microglia-astrocyte-neuron co-cultures, and microfluidic devices may allow precise manipulation of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions to discern local versus long-range signaling mechanisms [205]. Whereas in vivo models, in which ECM composition and tissue biomechanics are altered in defined regions, will enable the study of microglial responses and cell migration within intact neural circuits. Combining functional assays with ECM proteomics will help to identify molecular mediators of ECM-driven microglial dynamics.

In conclusion, we propose the microglial-ECM interactome as an emergent critical regulator of brain homeostasis and disease progression. The microglial-ECM interactome is not a singular mechanism for microglial activation and motility; it likely contributes to disease progression with other key modulators of microglial activity such as genetic alterations and neuroimmune modulation [206]. The interactome’s dynamic nature could allow for microglia to adapt to changes in the extracellular environment, facilitating cellular and process motility and other homeostatic microglial functions, however, this same responsiveness can also lead to maladaptive feedback loops in aging and neurodegeneration. The potential for microglia to operate as a coordinated network via the interactome introduces a new dimension to our understanding of neuroinflammatory spread and region-specific vulnerability. Elucidating the mechanisms that govern microglial communication and involvement of the ECM-interactome in disease will be essential for identifying novel therapeutic strategies aimed at halting or reversing the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Strategies that attempt to establish clear mechanisms most usefully will meet strident conditions for causality. This includes transgenic approaches in which identification and modulation of a microglia-specific transcript change the composition or physical properties of the ECM in ways that clearly influence CNS tissues challenged by disease or stress.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Potocsnak Family Vision Research Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., for support over the years.

Abbreviations

ATP

Adenosine triphosphate

BBB

Blood–brain barrier

CNS

Central nervous system

CSPG

Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan

DAMP

Danger–associated molecular pattern

EAE

Autoimmune encephalomyelitis

ECM

Extracellular matrix

GAG

Glycosaminoglycan

IGF

1–Insulin–like growth factor–1

IL

Interleukin

MMP

Matrix metalloprotease

OPC

Oligodendrocyte progenitor cell

PNN

Perineuronal net

Author contributions

L.K.W and D.J.C wrote the main manuscript text and prepared figures. Both authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.del Rio-Hortega P. The microglia. 1939.
  • 2.Tremblay ME, Lecours C, Samson L, Sanchez-Zafra V, Sierra A. From the Cajal alumni Achucarro and Rio-Hortega to the rediscovery of never-resting microglia. Front Neuroanat. 2015;9:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garcia-Marin V, Garcia-Lopez P, Freire M. Cajal’s contributions to glia research. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(9):479–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lau S-F, Fu AKY, Ip NY. Receptor–ligand interaction controls microglial chemotaxis and amelioration of alzheimer’s disease pathology. J Neurochem. 2023;166(6):891–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ng PY, McNeely TL, Baker DJ. Untangling senescent and damage-associated microglia in the aging and diseased brain. FEBS J. 2023;290(5):1326–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gao C, Jiang J, Tan Y, Chen S. Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Therapy. 2023;8(1):359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lannes N, Eppler E, Etemad S, Yotovski P, Filgueira L. Microglia at center stage: a comprehensive review about the versatile and unique residential macrophages of the central nervous system. Oncotarget. 2017;8(69):114393–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mehl LC, Manjally AV, Bouadi O, Gibson EM, Tay TL. Microglia in brain development and regeneration. Development. 2022;149(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Askew K, Li K, Olmos-Alonso A, Garcia-Moreno F, Liang Y, Richardson P, et al. Coupled proliferation and apoptosis maintain the rapid turnover of microglia in the adult brain. Cell Rep. 2017;18(2):391–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Montilla A, Ruiz A, Marquez M, Sierra A, Matute C, Domercq M. Role of mitochondrial dynamics in microglial activation and metabolic switch. Immunohorizons. 2021;5(8):615–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li Y, Xia X, Wang Y, Zheng JC. Mitochondrial dysfunction in microglia: a novel perspective for pathogenesis of alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barry-Carroll L, Gomez-Nicola D. The molecular determinants of microglial developmental dynamics. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024;25(6):414–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kent SA, Miron VE. Microglia regulation of central nervous system Myelin health and regeneration. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24(1):49–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Luan W, Qi X, Liang F, Zhang X, Jin Z, Shi L, et al. Microglia impede oligodendrocyte generation in aged brain. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:6813–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lewis ND, Hill JD, Juchem KW, Stefanopoulos DE, Modis LK. RNA sequencing of microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages from mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis illustrates a changing phenotype with disease course. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;277(1–2):26–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamasaki R, Lu H, Butovsky O, Ohno N, Rietsch AM, Cialic R, et al. Differential roles of microglia and monocytes in the inflamed central nervous system. J Exp Med. 2014;211(8):1533–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pu A, Stephenson EL, Yong VW. The extracellular matrix: focus on oligodendrocyte biology and targeting CSPGs for remyelination therapies. Glia. 2018;66(9):1809–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marangon D, Boccazzi M, Lecca D, Fumagalli M. Regulation of oligodendrocyte functions: targeting lipid metabolism and extracellular matrix for Myelin repair. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang P, Gorter RP, de Jonge JC, Nazmuddin M, Zhao C, Amor S, et al. MMP7 cleaves remyelination-impairing fibronectin aggregates and its expression is reduced in chronic multiple sclerosis lesions. Glia. 2018;66(8):1625–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giera S, Luo R, Ying Y, Ackerman SD, Jeong S-J, Stoveken HM, et al. Microglial transglutaminase-2 drives Myelination and Myelin repair via GPR56/ADGRG1 in oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Elife. 2018;7:e33385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schafer DP, Stevens B. Microglia function in central nervous system development and plasticity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(10):a020545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frost JL, Schafer DP, Microglia. Architects of the developing nervous system. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26(8):587–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paolicelli RC, Gross CT. Microglia in development: linking brain wiring to brain environment. Neuron Glia Biol. 2011;7(1):77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science. 2011;333(6048):1456–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schafer DP, Stevens B, Bennett ML, Bennett FC. Role of microglia in central nervous system development and plasticity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Liu YJ, Spangenberg EE, Tang B, Holmes TC, Green KN, Xu X. Microglia elimination increases neural circuit connectivity and activity in adult mouse cortex. J Neurosci. 2021;41(6):1274–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schafer DP, Lehrman EK, Stevens B. The quad-partite synapse: microglia-synapse interactions in the developing and mature CNS. Glia. 2013;61(1):24–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cornell J, Salinas S, Huang HY, Zhou M. Microglia regulation of synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(4):705–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Crapser JD, Ochaba J, Soni N, Reidling JC, Thompson LM, Green KN. Microglial depletion prevents extracellular matrix changes and striatal volume reduction in a model of huntington’s disease. Brain. 2020;143(1):266–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Crapser JD, Spangenberg EE, Barahona RA, Arreola MA, Hohsfield LA, Green KN. Microglia facilitate loss of perineuronal Nets in the alzheimer’s disease brain. EBioMedicine. 2020;58:102919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thompson JL, McCool S, Smith JC, Schaal V, Pendyala G, Yelamanchili S et al. Microglia respond to elevated intraocular pressure and synapse loss in the visual thalamus in a mouse model of glaucoma. bioRxiv. 2024:2024.10.25.619907.
  • 32.Beiter RM, Sheehan PW, Schafer DP. Microglia phagocytic mechanisms: development informing disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2024;86:102877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salter MW, Stevens B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat Med. 2017;23(9):1018–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bartels T, De Schepper S, Hong S. Microglia modulate neurodegeneration in alzheimer’s and parkinson’s diseases. Science. 2020;370(6512):66–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.O’Keeffe M, Booker SA, Walsh D, Li M, Henley C, Simoes de Oliveira L, et al. Typical development of synaptic and neuronal properties can proceed without microglia in the cortex and thalamus. Nat Neurosci. 2025;28(2):268–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao S, Umpierre AD, Wu LJ. Tuning neural circuits and behaviors by microglia in the adult brain. Trends Neurosci. 2024;47(3):181–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Parkhurst CN, Yang G, Ninan I, Savas JN, Yates JR 3rd, Lafaille JJ, et al. Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Cell. 2013;155(7):1596–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miyamoto A, Wake H, Ishikawa AW, Eto K, Shibata K, Murakoshi H, et al. Microglia contact induces synapse formation in developing somatosensory cortex. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stratoulias V, Ruiz R, Kanatani S, Osman AM, Keane L, Armengol JA, et al. ARG1-expressing microglia show a distinct molecular signature and modulate postnatal development and function of the mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26(6):1008–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang C, Wang L, Gu Y. Microglia, synaptic dynamics and forgetting. Brain Res Bull. 2021;174:173–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nguyen PT, Dorman LC, Pan S, Vainchtein ID, Han RT, Nakao-Inoue H, et al. Microglial remodeling of the extracellular matrix promotes synapse plasticity. Cell. 2020;182(2):388–403. e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu Y, Dissing-Olesen L, MacVicar BA, Stevens B, Microglia. Dynamic mediators of synapse development and plasticity. Trends Immunol. 2015;36(10):605–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yuan T, Orock A, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B. Amygdala microglia modify neuronal plasticity via complement C1q/C3-CR3 signaling and contribute to visceral pain in a rat model. Am J Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol. 2021;320(6):G1081–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rayaprolu S, Mullen B, Baker M, Lynch T, Finger E, Seeley WW, et al. TREM2 in neurodegeneration: evidence for association of the p.R47H variant with frontotemporal dementia and parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegeneration. 2013;8(1):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eyo U, Molofsky AV. Defining microglial-synapse interactions. Science. 2023;381(6663):1155–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pereira-Iglesias M, Maldonado-Teixido J, Melero A, Piriz J, Galea E, Ransohoff RM, et al. Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses. Nat Neurosci. 2025;28(1):15–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lively S, Schlichter LC. The microglial activation state regulates migration and roles of matrix-dissolving enzymes for invasion. J Neuroinflamm. 2013;10(1):843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Butler CA, Popescu AS, Kitchener EJA, Allendorf DH, Puigdellívol M, Brown GC. Microglial phagocytosis of neurons in neurodegeneration, and its regulation. J Neurochem. 2021;158(3):621–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fatoba O, Itokazu T, Yamashita T. Complement cascade functions during brain development and neurodegeneration. FEBS J. 2022;289(8):2085–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Whitelaw BS, Stoessel MB, Majewska AK. Movers and shakers: microglial dynamics and modulation of neural networks. Glia. 2023;71(7):1575–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stevens B, Johnson MB. The complement cascade repurposed in the brain. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(10):624–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stevens B, Allen NJ, Vazquez LE, Howell GR, Christopherson KS, Nouri N, et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell. 2007;131(6):1164–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ding X, Wang J, Huang M, Chen Z, Liu J, Zhang Q, et al. Loss of microglial SIRPα promotes synaptic pruning in preclinical models of neurodegeneration. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Soteros BM, Sia GM. Complement and microglia dependent synapse elimination in brain development. WIREs Mech Dis. 2022;14(3):e1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Green TRF, Rowe RK. Quantifying microglial morphology: an insight into function. Clin Exp Immunol. 2024;216(3):221–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Godeanu S, Cătălin B. The complementary role of morphology in Understanding microglial functional heterogeneity. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(8):3811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sankowski R, Prinz M. A dynamic and multimodal framework to define microglial States. Nat Neurosci. 2025;28(7):1372–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Paolicelli RC, Sierra A, Stevens B, Tremblay ME, Aguzzi A, Ajami B, et al. Microglia States and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads. Neuron. 2022;110(21):3458–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Colonna M, Butovsky O. Microglia function in the central nervous system during health and neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35:441–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hristovska I, Pascual O. Deciphering resting microglial morphology and process motility from a synaptic prospect. Front Integr Nuerosci. 2016;9–2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Eyo UB, Wu LJ, Microglia. Lifelong patrolling immune cells of the brain. Prog Neurobiol. 2019;179:101614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(6):752–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang Y, Wei D, Wang X, Wang B, Li M, Fang H, et al. Run-and-Tumble dynamics and mechanotaxis discovered in microglial migration. Res (Wash D C). 2023;6:0063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cangalaya C, Wegmann S, Sun W, Diez L, Gottfried A, Richter K, et al. Real-time mechanisms of exacerbated synaptic remodeling by microglia in acute models of systemic inflammation and tauopathy. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;110:245–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Akiyoshi R, Wake H, Kato D, Horiuchi H, Ono R, Ikegami A, et al. Microglia enhance synapse activity to promote local network synchronization. Eneuro. 2018;5(5):ENEURO0088–182018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wake H, Moorhouse AJ, Jinno S, Kohsaka S, Nabekura J. Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses < em > in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals. J Neurosci. 2009;29(13):3974–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Haynes SE, Hollopeter G, Yang G, Kurpius D, Dailey ME, Gan W-B, et al. The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(12):1512–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kamei R, Okabe S. In vivo imaging of the phagocytic dynamics underlying efficient clearance of adult-born hippocampal granule cells by ramified microglia. Glia. 2023;71(8):2005–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Arandjelovic S, Ravichandran KS. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in homeostasis. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(9):907–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shao X, Gomez CD, Kapoor N, Considine JM, Grams C, Gao Y, et al. MatrisomeDB 2.0: 2023 updates to the ECM-protein knowledge database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;51(D1):D1519–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ortega JA, Soares de Aguiar GP, Chandravanshi P, Levy N, Engel E, Álvarez Z. Exploring the properties and potential of the neural extracellular matrix for next-generation regenerative therapies. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2024;16(3):e1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Crapser JD, Arreola MA, Tsourmas KI, Green KN. Microglia as hackers of the matrix: sculpting synapses and the extracellular space. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(11):2472–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):786–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Winkler J, Abisoye-Ogunniyan A, Metcalf KJ, Werb Z. Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Madry C, Attwell D. Receptors, ion channels, and signaling mechanisms underlying microglial dynamics. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(20):12443–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wareham LK, Baratta RO, Del Buono BJ, Schlumpf E, Calkins DJ. Collagen in the central nervous system: contributions to neurodegeneration and promise as a therapeutic target. Mol Neurodegener. 2024;19(1):11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Karamanos NK, Theocharis AD, Piperigkou Z, Manou D, Passi A, Skandalis SS, et al. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix. FEBS J. 2021;288(24):6850–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Su M, Soomro SH, Jie J, Fu H. Effects of the extracellular matrix on Myelin development and regeneration in the central nervous system. Tissue Cell. 2021;69:101444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dityatev A, Seidenbecher CI, Schachner M. Compartmentalization from the outside: the extracellular matrix and functional microdomains in the brain. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(11):503–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kwok JCF, Foscarin S, Fawcett JW. Perineuronal Nets: A Special Structure in the Central Nervous System Extracellular matrix. In: Leach JB, Powell EM, editors. Extracellular matrix. New York, NY: Springer New York 2015;23–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pizzorusso T, Medini P, Berardi N, Chierzi S, Fawcett JW, Maffei L. Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science. 2002;298(5596):1248–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tewari BP, Woo AM, Prim CE, Chaunsali L, Patel DC, Kimbrough IF, et al. Astrocytes require perineuronal Nets to maintain synaptic homeostasis in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2024;27(8):1475–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Crapser JD, Spangenberg EE, Barahona RA, Arreola MA, Hohsfield LA, Green KN. Microglia facilitate loss of perineuronal nets in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. eBioMedicine. 2020;58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 84.Tansley S, Gu N, Guzmán AU, Cai W, Wong C, Lister KC, et al. Microglia-mediated degradation of perineuronal Nets promotes pain. Science. 2022;377(6601):80–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Arreola MA, Soni N, Crapser JD, Hohsfield LA, Elmore MR, Matheos DP, et al. Microglial dyshomeostasis drives perineuronal net and synaptic loss in a CSF1R+/– mouse model of ALSP, which can be rescued via CSF1R inhibitors. Sci Adv. 2021;7(35):eabg1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gray DT, Khattab S, Meltzer J, McDermott K, Schwyhart R, Sinakevitch I, et al. Retrosplenial cortex microglia and perineuronal net densities are associated with memory impairment in aged rhesus macaques. Cereb Cortex. 2022;33(8):4626–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dzyubenko E, Willig KI, Yin D, Sardari M, Tokmak E, Labus P, et al. Structural changes in perineuronal Nets and their perforating GABAergic synapses precede motor coordination recovery post stroke. J Biomed Sci. 2023;30(1):76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dudvarski Stankovic N, Teodorczyk M, Ploen R, Zipp F, Schmidt MHH. Microglia-blood vessel interactions: a double-edged sword in brain pathologies. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(3):347–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wareham LK, Calkins DJ. The neurovascular unit in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mayer MG, Fischer T. Microglia at the blood brain barrier in health and disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2024;18:1360195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Knopp RC, Banks WA, Erickson MA. Physical associations of microglia and the vascular blood-brain barrier and their importance in development, health, and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022;77:102648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kozai TD, Vazquez AL, Weaver CL, Kim SG, Cui XT. In vivo two-photon microscopy reveals immediate microglial reaction to implantation of microelectrode through extension of processes. J Neural Eng. 2012;9(6):066001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Li F, Gallego J, Tirko NN, Greaser J, Bashe D, Patel R, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) modulates microglial activation following intracortical microelectrode implantation. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):5512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Haruwaka K, Ikegami A, Tachibana Y, Ohno N, Konishi H, Hashimoto A, et al. Dual microglia effects on blood brain barrier permeability induced by systemic inflammation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Morris G, Fernandes BS, Puri BK, Walker AJ, Carvalho AF, Berk M. Leaky brain in neurological and psychiatric disorders: drivers and consequences. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018;52(10):924–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Davalos D, Kyu Ryu J, Merlini M, Baeten KM, Le Moan N, Petersen MA, et al. Fibrinogen-induced perivascular microglial clustering is required for the development of axonal damage in neuroinflammation. Nat Commun. 2012;3(1):1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rosidi NL, Zhou J, Pattanaik S, Wang P, Jin W, Brophy M, et al. Cortical microhemorrhages cause local inflammation but do not trigger widespread dendrite degeneration. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e26612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Reviews Neurol. 2021;17(3):157–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Izquierdo P, Attwell D, Madry C. Ion channels and receptors as determinants of microglial function. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42(4):278–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.SenGupta S, Parent CA, Bear JE. The principles of directed cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(8):529–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Fan Y, Xie L, Chung CY. Signaling pathways controlling microglia chemotaxis. Mol Cells. 2017;40(3):163–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Rikitake Y, Takai Y. Chapter three - Directional Cell Migration: Regulation by Small G Proteins, Nectin-like Molecule-5, and Afadin. In: Jeon KW, editor. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 287: Academic Press. 2011;97–143. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 103.Ji C, Huang Y. Durotaxis and negative durotaxis: where should cells go? Commun Biology. 2023;6(1):1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Park J, Kim DH, Levchenko A, Topotaxis. A new mechanism of directed cell migration in topographic ECM gradients. Biophys J. 2018;114(6):1257–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nwogbaga I, Camley B. Models of galvanotaxis: coupling cell migration and shape. Biophys J. 2021;120(3):170a. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Michaelis UR. Mechanisms of endothelial cell migration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71(21):4131–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.de Oliveira S, Rosowski EE, Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(6):378–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Smolders SM-T, Kessels S, Vangansewinkel T, Rigo J-M, Legendre P, Brône B. Microglia: brain cells on the move. Prog Neurobiol. 2019;178:101612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Yamada KM, Collins JW, Cruz Walma DA, Doyle AD, Morales SG, Lu J, et al. Extracellular matrix dynamics in cell migration, invasion and tissue morphogenesis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2019;100(3):144–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hickman SE, Kingery ND, Ohsumi TK, Borowsky ML, Wang L-c, Means TK, et al. The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(12):1896–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Nasu-Tada K, Koizumi S, Inoue K. Involvement of β1 integrin in microglial chemotaxis and proliferation on fibronectin: different regulations by ADP through PKA. Glia. 2005;52(2):98–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 1996;84(3):359–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gardel ML, Schneider IC, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Waterman CM. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:315–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Abercrombie M, The Croonian Lecture. 1978 - The crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences. 1980;207(1167):129–47.
  • 115.Lo C-M, Wang H-B, Dembo M, Wang Y-l. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J. 2000;79(1):144–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Peyton SR, Putnam AJ. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion. J Cell Physiol. 2005;204(1):198–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Pelham RJ, Wang Y-l. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94(25):13661–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Bollmann L, Koser DE, Shahapure R, Gautier HO, Holzapfel GA, Scarcelli G, et al. Microglia mechanics: immune activation alters traction forces and durotaxis. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Melo P, Socodato R, Silveira MS, Neves MAD, Relvas JB, Mendes Pinto I. Mechanical actuators in microglia dynamics and function. Eur J Cell Biol. 2022;101(3):151247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Redmon SN, Yarishkin O, Lakk M, Jo A, Mustafić E, Tvrdik P, et al. TRPV4 channels mediate the mechanoresponse in retinal microglia. Glia. 2021;69(6):1563–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhu T, Guo J, Wu Y, Lei T, Zhu J, Chen H, et al. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 modulates the migration and immune response of microglia. iScience. 2023;26(2):105993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hu J, Chen Q, Zhu H, Hou L, Liu W, Yang Q, et al. Microglial Piezo1 senses Abeta fibril stiffness to restrict alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2023;111(1):15–29. e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zhu Y, Garcia-Sanchez J, Dalal R, Sun Y, Kapiloff MS, Goldberg JL, et al. Differential expression of PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 mechanosensitive channels in ocular tissues implicates diverse functional roles. Exp Eye Res. 2023;236:109675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Maheshwari U, Huang SF, Sridhar S, Keller A. The interplay between brain vascular calcification and microglia. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:848495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wareham LK, Liddelow SA, Temple S, Benowitz LI, Di Polo A, Wellington C, et al. Solving neurodegeneration: common mechanisms and strategies for new treatments. Mol Neurodegener. 2022;17(1):23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Koo EH, Park L, Selkoe DJ. Amyloid beta-protein as a substrate interacts with extracellular matrix to promote neurite outgrowth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1993;90(10):4748–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 127.Brandan E, Inestrosa NC. Extracellular matrix components and amyloid in neuritic plaques of alzheimer’s disease. Gen Pharmacol. 1993;24(5):1063–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sun Y, Xu S, Jiang M, Liu X, Yang L, Bai Z, et al. Role of the extracellular matrix in alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:707466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Rahman MM, Lendel C. Extracellular protein components of amyloid plaques and their roles in alzheimer’s disease pathology. Mol Neurodegeneration. 2021;16(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Moretto E, Stuart S, Surana S, Vargas JNS, Schiavo G. The role of extracellular matrix components in the spreading of pathological protein aggregates. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:844211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Choi I, Wang M, Yoo S, Xu P, Seegobin SP, Li X, et al. Autophagy enables microglia to engage amyloid plaques and prevents microglial senescence. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25(7):963–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Baligács N, Albertini G, Borrie SC, Serneels L, Pridans C, Balusu S, et al. Homeostatic microglia initially seed and activated microglia later reshape amyloid plaques in alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):10634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ayata P, Schaefer A. Innate sensing of mechanical properties of brain tissue by microglia. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;62:123–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Jäntti H, Sitnikova V, Ishchenko Y, Shakirzyanova A, Giudice L, Ugidos IF, et al. Microglial amyloid beta clearance is driven by PIEZO1 channels. J Neuroinflamm. 2022;19(1):147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Park J-C, Han JW, Lee W, Kim J, Lee S-E, Lee D, et al. Microglia gravitate toward amyloid plaques surrounded by externalized phosphatidylserine via TREM2. Adv Sci. 2024;11(34):2400064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kiani L. ApoE attracts microglia to amyloid-β plaques. Nat Reviews Neurol. 2023;19(11):639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Gotkiewicz M, Capra J, Miettinen PO, Natunen T, Tanila H. Three-dimensional view of microglia—amyloid plaque interactions. Glia. 2025;73(1):196–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lau SF, Wu W, Wong HY, Ouyang L, Qiao Y, Xu J, et al. The VCAM1-ApoE pathway directs microglial chemotaxis and alleviates alzheimer’s disease pathology. Nat Aging. 2023;3(10):1219–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Laprell L, Schulze C, Brehme M-L, Oertner TG. The role of microglia membrane potential in chemotaxis. J Neuroinflamm. 2021;18(1):21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Clark IC, Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Wheeler MA, Li Z, Rothhammer V, Linnerbauer M et al. Barcoded viral tracing of single-cell interactions in central nervous system inflammation. Science. 2021;372(6540). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 141.Vainchtein ID, Molofsky AV. Astrocytes and microglia: in sickness and in health. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43(3):144–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Khan F, Pang L, Dunterman M, Lesniak MS, Heimberger AB, Chen P. Macrophages and microglia in glioblastoma: heterogeneity, plasticity, and therapy. J Clin Investig. 2023;133(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 143.Hambardzumyan D, Gutmann DH, Kettenmann H. The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19(1):20–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Chang C-W, Bale A, Bhargava R, Harley BAC. Glioblastoma drives protease-independent extracellular matrix invasion of microglia. Mater Today Bio. 2025;31:101475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.So JS, Kim H, Han KS. Mechanisms of invasion in glioblastoma: extracellular matrix, Ca(2+) signaling, and glutamate. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:663092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Ye ZC, Sontheimer H. Glioma cells release excitotoxic concentrations of glutamate. Cancer Res. 1999;59(17):4383–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Sontheimer H. A role for glutamate in growth and invasion of primary brain tumors. J Neurochem. 2008;105(2):287–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Noch E, Khalili K. Molecular mechanisms of necrosis in glioblastoma: the role of glutamate excitotoxicity. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(19):1791–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Liu GJ, Nagarajah R, Banati RB, Bennett MR. Glutamate induces directed chemotaxis of microglia. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29(6):1108–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Brandebura AN, Paumier A, Onur TS, Allen NJ. Astrocyte contribution to dysfunction, risk and progression in neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023;24(1):23–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Liu YU, Ying Y, Li Y, Eyo UB, Chen T, Zheng J, et al. Neuronal network activity controls microglial process surveillance in awake mice via norepinephrine signaling. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(11):1771–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Stowell RD, Sipe GO, Dawes RP, Batchelor HN, Lordy KA, Whitelaw BS, et al. Noradrenergic signaling in the wakeful state inhibits microglial surveillance and synaptic plasticity in the mouse visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(11):1782–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Badimon A, Strasburger HJ, Ayata P, Chen X, Nair A, Ikegami A, et al. Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature. 2020;586(7829):417–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Stebbing MJ, Cottee JM, Rana I. The role of ion channels in microglial activation and Proliferation - A complex interplay between Ligand-Gated ion channels, K(+) channels, and intracellular Ca(2). Front Immunol. 2015;6:497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Eder C. Regulation of microglial behavior by ion channel activity. J Neurosci Res. 2005;81(3):314–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Schilling T, Eder C. Microglial K + channel expression in young adult and aged mice. Glia. 2015;63(4):664–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Newell EW, Schlichter LC. Integration of K + and Cl–currents regulate steady-state and dynamic membrane potentials in cultured rat microglia. J Physiol. 2005;567(3):869–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Calovi S, Mut-Arbona P, Sperlágh B. Microglia and the purinergic signaling system. Neuroscience. 2019;405:137–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Franco-Bocanegra DK, McAuley C, Nicoll JAR, Boche D. Molecular mechanisms of microglial motility: changes in ageing and alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2019;8(6):639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Ohsawa K, Irino Y, Nakamura Y, Akazawa C, Inoue K, Kohsaka S. Involvement of P2X4 and P2Y12 receptors in ATP-induced microglial chemotaxis. Glia. 2007;55(6):604–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Swiatkowski P, Murugan M, Eyo UB, Wang Y, Rangaraju S, Oh SB, et al. Activation of microglial P2Y12 receptor is required for outward potassium currents in response to neuronal injury. Neuroscience. 2016;318:22–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Calkins DJ. Adaptive responses to neurodegenerative stress in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;84:100953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Yang H, Reynaud J, Lockwood H, Williams G, Hardin C, Reyes L, et al. The connective tissue phenotype of glaucomatous cupping in the monkey eye - Clinical and research implications. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;59:1–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Stowell C, Burgoyne CF, Tamm ER, Ethier CR. Lasker iioa, glaucomatous neurodegeneration P. Biomechanical aspects of axonal damage in glaucoma: A brief review. Exp Eye Res. 2017;157:13–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Langmann T. Microglia activation in retinal degeneration. J Leucocyte Biology. 2007;81(6):1345–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Xu M-X, Zhao G-L, Hu X, Zhou H, Li S-Y, Li F, et al. P2X7/P2X4 Receptors Mediate Proliferation and Migration of Retinal Microglia in Experimental Glaucoma in Mice. Neurosci Bull. 2022;38(8):901–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Dudiki T, Meller J, Mahajan G, Liu H, Zhevlakova I, Stefl S, et al. Microglia control vascular architecture via a TGFβ1 dependent paracrine mechanism linked to tissue mechanics. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Soles A, Selimovic A, Sbrocco K, Ghannoum F, Hamel K, Moncada EL et al. Extracellular matrix regulation in physiology and in brain disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 169.Perkins KL, Arranz AM, Yamaguchi Y, Hrabetova S. Brain extracellular space, hyaluronan, and the prevention of epileptic seizures. Rev Neurosci. 2017;28(8):869–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Jin J, Tilve S, Huang Z, Zhou L, Geller HM, Yu P. Effect of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans on neuronal cell adhesion, spreading and neurite growth in culture. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13(2):289–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Auer S, Schicht M, Hoffmann L, Budday S, Frischknecht R, Blümcke I et al. The role of perineuronal Nets in physiology and disease: insights from recent studies. Cells. 2025;14(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 172.Stoyanov S, Sun W, Düsedau HP, Cangalaya C, Choi I, Mirzapourdelavar H, et al. Attenuation of the extracellular matrix restores microglial activity during the early stage of amyloidosis. Glia. 2021;69(1):182–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Deczkowska A, Amit I, Schwartz M. Microglial immune checkpoint mechanisms. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(6):779–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science. 2005;308(5726):1314–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Kim C, Cho E-D, Kim H-K, You S, Lee H-J, Hwang D, et al. β1-integrin-dependent migration of microglia in response to neuron-released α-synuclein. Exp Mol Med. 2014;46(4):e91–e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Harrison JK, Jiang Y, Chen S, Xia Y, Maciejewski D, McNamara RK et al. Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediating interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95(18):10896–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 177.Wu LJ, Vadakkan KI, Zhuo M. ATP-induced chemotaxis of microglial processes requires P2Y receptor‐activated initiation of outward potassium currents. Glia. 2007;55(8):810–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Berdiaki A, Neagu M, Tzanakakis P, Spyridaki I, Pérez S, Nikitovic D. Extracellular matrix components and mechanosensing pathways in health and disease. Biomolecules. 2024;14(9):1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Ulbrich P, Khoshneviszadeh M, Jandke S, Schreiber S, Dityatev A. Interplay between perivascular and perineuronal extracellular matrix remodelling in neurological and psychiatric diseases. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53(12):3811–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Dzyubenko E, Hermann DM. Role of glia and extracellular matrix in controlling neuroplasticity in the central nervous system. Semin Immunopathol. 2023;45(3):377–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Gomez-Arboledas A, Acharya MM, Tenner AJ. The role of complement in synaptic pruning and neurodegeneration. Immunotargets Ther. 2021;10:373–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Andoh M, Ikegaya Y, Koyama R. Synaptic pruning by microglia in epilepsy. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 183.Milner R, Campbell IL. Cytokines regulate microglial adhesion to laminin and astrocyte extracellular matrix via protein kinase C-dependent activation of the α6β1 integrin. J Neurosci. 2002;22(5):1562–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Cui Y, Rolova T, Fagerholm SC. The role of integrins in brain health and neurodegenerative diseases. Eur J Cell Biol. 2024;103(3):151441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Wu X, Reddy DS. Integrins as receptor targets for neurological disorders. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;134(1):68–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Stelling MP, Motta JM, Mashid M, Johnson WE, Pavão MS, Farrell NP. Metal ions and the extracellular matrix in tumor migration. FEBS J. 2019;286(15):2950–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Oudin MJ, Weaver VM. Physical and chemical gradients in the tumor microenvironment regulate tumor cell invasion, migration, and metastasis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2016;81:189–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Dormond O, Ponsonnet L, Hasmim M, Foletti A, Ruegg C. Manganese-induced integrin affinity maturation promotes recruitment of alpha V beta 3 integrin to focal adhesions in endothelial cells: evidence for a role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Src. Thromb Haemost. 2004;92(1):151–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Lein P, Gallagher PJ, Amodeo J, Howie H, Roth JA. Manganese induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells via upregulation of alpha(v) integrins. Brain Res. 2000;885(2):220–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Cangalaya C, Sun W, Stoyanov S, Dunay IR, Dityatev A. Integrity of neural extracellular matrix is required for microglia-mediated synaptic remodeling. Glia. 2024;72(10):1874–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.de Jong JM, Wang P, Oomkens M, Baron W. Remodeling of the interstitial extracellular matrix in white matter multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for remyelination (failure). J Neurosci Res. 2020;98(7):1370–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Ferrer VP, Moura Neto V, Mentlein R. Glioma infiltration and extracellular matrix: key players and modulators. Glia. 2018;66(8):1542–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Rutka JT, Myatt CA, Giblin JR, Davis RL, Rosenblum ML. Distribution of extracellular matrix proteins in primary human brain tumours: an immunohistochemical analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1987;14(1):25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Robert L, Labat-Robert J. Longevity and aging: role of genes and of the extracellular matrix. Biogerontology. 2015;16(1):125–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Zhang L, Zhou J, Kong W. Extracellular matrix in vascular homeostasis and disease. Nat Reviews Cardiol. 2025;22(5):333–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Yang B, Li Z, Li P, Liu Y, Ding X, Feng E. Piezo1 in microglial cells: implications for neuroinflammation and tumorigenesis. Channels. 2025;19(1):2492161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Sasaki Y, Kimura N, Aso Y, Yabuuchi K, Aikawa M, Matsubara E. Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid matrix metalloproteinases levels and brain amyloid deposition in mild cognitive impairment. Biomolecules. 2021;11(10):1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Umpierre AD, Wu LJ. How microglia sense and regulate neuronal activity. Glia. 2021;69(7):1637–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Choi MS, Cho KS, Shin SM, Ko HM, Kwon KJ, Shin CY, et al. ATP induced microglial cell migration through non-transcriptional activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Arch Pharm Res. 2010;33(2):257–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Allnoch L, Leitzen E, Zdora I, Baumgartner W, Hansmann F. Astrocyte depletion alters extracellular matrix composition in the demyelinating phase of theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6):e0270239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Calkins DJ. Critical pathogenic events underlying progression of neurodegeneration in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31(6):702–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Dere E, Zlomuzica A. The role of gap junctions in the brain in health and disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(1):206–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Szepesi Z, Manouchehrian O, Bachiller S, Deierborg T. Bidirectional Microglia-Neuron communication in health and disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Cooper ML, Gildea HK, Selles MC, Katafygiotou E, Liddelow SA, Chao MV. Astrocytes in the mouse brain respond bilaterally to unilateral retinal neurodegeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2025;122(11):e2418249122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 205.Bosworth AM, Kim H, O’Grady KP, Richter I, Lee L, O’Grady BJ, et al. Influence of substrate stiffness on barrier function in an iPSC-Derived in vitro Blood-Brain barrier model. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2022;15(1):31–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Scott-Hewitt N, Huang Y, Stevens B. Convergent mechanisms of microglia-mediated synaptic dysfunction contribute to diverse neuropathological conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1525(1):5–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Molecular Neurodegeneration are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES