Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1987 Nov 7;295(6607):1169–1172. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6607.1169

Cardiac output during labour.

S C Robson 1, W Dunlop 1, R J Boys 1, S Hunter 1
PMCID: PMC1248244  PMID: 3120929

Abstract

Serial measurements of cardiac output and mean arterial pressure were performed in 15 women during the first stage of labour and at one and 24 hours after delivery. Cardiac output was measured by Doppler and cross sectional echocardiography at the pulmonary valve. Basal cardiac output (between uterine contractions) increased from a prelabour mean of 6.99 l/min to 7.88 l/min at greater than or equal to 8 cm of cervical dilatation as a result of an increase in stroke volume. Over the same period basal mean arterial pressure also increased. During uterine contractions there was a further increase in cardiac output as a result of increases in both stroke volume and heart rate. The increment in cardiac output during contractions became progressively greater as labour advanced. At greater than or equal to 8 cm of dilatation cardiac output increased from a basal mean of 7.88 l/min to 10.57 l/min during contractions. There were also further increases in mean blood pressure during contractions. One hour after delivery heart rate and cardiac output had returned to prelabour values, though mean arterial pressure and stroke volume remained raised. By 24 hours after delivery all haemodynamic variables had returned to prelabour values. Haemodynamic changes of the magnitude found in this series are of considerable clinical relevance in managing mothers with complicated cardiovascular function.

Full text

PDF
1169

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADAMS J. Q., ALEXANDER A. M., Jr Alterations in cardiovascular physiology during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1958 Nov;12(5):542–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conradsson T. B., Werkö L. Management of heart disease in pregnancy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1974 Jan-Feb;16(4):407–419. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(74)90031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EDWARDS E. M. The blood pressure in normal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1958 Jun;65(3):367–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1958.tb08516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HENDRICKS C. H., QUILLIGAN E. J. Cardiac output during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956 May;71(5):953–972. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(56)90720-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KERR M. G. THE MECHANICAL EFFECTS OF THE GRAVID UTERUS IN LATE PREGNANCY. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1965 Aug;72:513–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1965.tb00061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lees M. M., Scott D. B., Kerr M. G., Taylor S. H. The circulatory effects of recumbent postural change in late pregnancy. Clin Sci. 1967 Jun;32(3):453–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maruta S. [The observation of the maternal hemodynamics during labor and cesarean section (author's transl)]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 Jun;34(6):776–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robson S. C., Dunlop W., Hunter S. Haemodynamic changes during the early puerperium. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 25;294(6579):1065–1065. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6579.1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stewart W. J., Jiang L., Mich R., Pandian N., Guerrero J. L., Weyman A. E. Variable effects of changes in flow rate through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area and flow velocity: impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Sep;6(3):653–662. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80127-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ueland K., Hansen J. M. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. 3. Labor and delivery under local and caudal analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Jan 1;103(1):8–18. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34334-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. VORYS N., ULLERY J. C., HANUSEK G. E. The cardiac output changes in various positions in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Dec;82:1312–1321. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)36259-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES