Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2025 Aug 14;12(10):nwaf337. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf337

Significant contribution of the unicellular cyanobacterium UCYN-B to oceanic nitrogen fixation

Ruotong Jiang 1,b, Haizheng Hong 2,b, Zuozhu Wen 3, Xinran Yu 4, Thomas J Browning 5, Ze Chen 6, Yanpeng Shang 7, Xin Liu 8, Zhimian Cao 9, Eric P Achterberg 10, Minhan Dai 11, Dalin Shi 12,
PMCID: PMC12485613  PMID: 41040495

ABSTRACT

Dinitrogen (N2) fixation by diazotrophs forms a critical control on ocean productivity, yet our understanding of the distribution, abundance and activity of these microorganisms is informed by observations with limited geographical coverage. Here we show that the unicellular N2-fixing cyanobacterium, UCYN-B, drives high N2 fixation rates in the western North Pacific. Defining the ecological niche of UCYN-B using our new observations in combination with existing global diazotroph datasets allowed prediction of additional and previously unrecognized UCYN-B-dominated N2 fixation hot spots throughout large, unsampled swathes of the global ocean. Collectively, these regions potentially contribute 10.8–15.0 Tg N yr−1 to global marine N2 fixation, suggesting a pivotal role for UCYN-B in the regulation of the marine nitrogen inventory and therefore ocean productivity.

Keywords: nitrogen fixation, unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacteria, UCYN-B, ocean productivity


UCYN-B drives high N2 fixation rates in previously unrecognized hot spots across the global ocean, making a significant contribution to the marine nitrogen inventory and ocean productivity.

INTRODUCTION

Primary production throughout most of the ocean is limited by the availability of fixed nitrogen (N) [1], which is ultimately determined by the balance between input and loss processes [2]. N2-fixing microorganisms (diazotrophs) convert N2 gas into ammonium, which together with other minor N sources (e.g. aerosols and rivers) balances N losses via denitrification and anammox [3]. Whether the oceanic N budget is in balance is both critically important to the Earth system and highly dependent on accurately measured oceanic N2 fixation rates [4]. Both N2 fixation rates and diazotroph abundances remain strongly under-sampled; diazotroph ecological niche assessment (environmental conditions associated with different diazotroph species) provides a mean to make much wider projections based on environmental predictors [5]. The filamentous cyanobacterium Trichodesmium and the symbiotic cyanobacterium Richelia have historically been considered to be the dominant diazotrophs in warm, low N (sub)tropical waters [6–9]. More recently, the unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium UCYN-A has been shown to be widely distributed in the oceans, particularly in colder, N-rich coastal upwelling and higher latitude regions [10–12]. Accordingly, these niches have constrained environmentally-driven predictions of marine N2 fixation [5]. Therefore, the discovery of new niches has the potential to broaden spatial-temporal predictions of global marine diazotrophy.

Until recently, our understanding of diazotrophy in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG), one of Earth's largest biomes, has been primarily informed by studies at the Hawaii Ocean Time-series site. Here, UCYN-A has been found to dominate diazotrophic communities [13,14], alongside frequent Trichodesmium and Richelia blooms in summer [15,16]. More recent observations have shown considerable variability in both N2 fixation rates and diazotroph community structure across the NPSG, accompanied by large spatial gradients in the physical and biogeochemical characteristics of seawater [17–21]. For example, Wen et al. [21] observed high abundance of the unicellular cyanobacterium UCYN-B in the diazotroph community and high N2 fixation rates along an ∼3000 km section in the (sub)tropical western North Pacific. Machine learning models based on high-resolution observations further underscore the global significance of N2 fixation in this region [22], where diazotrophy has been under-sampled and high rates of N2 fixation have not been widely observed [5,23]. While the N2 fixation capacity of UCYN-B has been demonstrated through both field observations and laboratory cultures [24,25], there has been limited documentation of its elevated abundances in the global ocean, with a few reports restricted to the station ALOHA and a limited area of the South Pacific Gyre [26–28]. In fact, the global distribution and regulatory mechanisms of UCYN-B are not yet well known [29], and its contribution to global N2 fixation may have been overlooked mainly due to lack of investigation.

In this study, we systematically evaluated the importance of UCYN-B to global oceanic N2 fixation by first conducting two additional large-scale (∼11 000 km) field sampling campaigns in the western North Pacific in both summer and winter (Fig. S1); second, assessing the ecological niches of UCYN-B alongside the other three major cyanobacterial diazotrophs (i.e. Trichodesmium, UCYN-A and Richelia) using Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) with our new observations in combination with recently reported global databases of diazotrophy [30]; and finally, estimating the biogeography and contribution of UCYN-B to N2 fixation in the global ocean.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

UCYN-B dominated diazotroph community in the western North Pacific

Depth-integrated N2 fixation rates for the NPSG stations in our study ranged between 199 and 821 μmol N m2 d1 in summer and declined to 20 and 228 μmol N m2 d1 in winter (Fig. S1). These high rates are comparable to reported rates in this area in late spring (429 ± 93 μmol N m−2 d−1) [21], and are amongst the highest rates reported in the global ocean (Table 1 and Fig. S1). These results demonstrate high levels of N2 fixation in the western (sub)tropical North Pacific. At the NPSG and adjacent North Equatorial Current (NEC) affected stations with high N2 fixation rates (e.g. MR04, M22, M18 and K13a_W; see Table S1 for station information), the <10 μm size fraction of the diazotroph community accounted for 63%–98% of bulk N2 fixation in both summer and winter (Fig. 1a), which is in line with previous studies showing that nanoplanktonic cyanobacteria were the major diazotrophs in this region, especially in summer [18]. Metagenomic analyses showed that UCYN-B accounted for >65% of the diazotroph community at stations WPS and M22 in summer where high N2 fixation rates were observed (Table S2). The nifH gene amplicon sequencing further revealed that >70% of the DNA sequences at stations with high N2 fixation rates (K2b, WPS, MR04, M22, M22_W and K11a_W) were identical to UCYN-B (Fig. S2a, b), and showed 99%–100% nucleotide similarity to Crocosphaera watsonii WH8501 (Fig. S2c). Quantitative analysis of the absolute nifH gene abundance demonstrated that UCYN-B constituted the major portion (67%–99%) of the total depth-integrated nifH gene abundances of the major N2-fixing cyanobacterial diazotrophs at the NPSG and NEC stations with high N2 fixation rates in both seasons, except for K2b where a Trichodesmium bloom occurred during sampling (Fig. 1b).

Table 1.

Areal N2 fixation rates in the Northwest (Sub)tropical Pacific and the identified hot spots of N2 fixation in the global ocean.

Regions Areal N2 fixation rate (μmol N m−2 d−1)a Number of observations
North Pacific
 Western NPSG (summer)b,c 593 ± 233 7
 Western NPSG (winter)b,c 102 ± 95 4
 Western NPSG (spring) [21]c 429 ± 93 7
 Kuroshio (summer) [20]d 239 ± 84 3
 Kuroshio intrusion-affected South China Sea (summer) [31]c 463 ± 260 6
 ALOHA (annual) [32]c,d 228 ± 135 71
Tropical South Pacific
 Bismarck Sea (austral summer) [33]c 415 ± 218 6
 North Solomon Sea (austral summer) [33]c 2410 ± 1869 6
 Melanesian Archipelago (austral summer) [34]d 631 ± 286 17
 New Caledonia (annual) [34]d 301 ± 208 5
North Atlantic
 Tropical North Atlantic (annual) [35]d,e 239 ± 38 154
 Tropical North Atlantic (summer) [36]c 305 ± 277 14
a

Mean value ± standard deviation; bStations assigned to NPSG (North Pacific Subtropical Gyre) are shown in Fig. 1; cN2 fixation rates measured using the 15N2-enriched water method; dN2 fixation rates measured using the 15N2 gas method; eN2 fixation rates measured using the C2H2 reduction method.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Distribution of N2 fixing diazotrophs in the western North Pacific. (a) Depth profiles of N2 fixation rates in bulk-water (mean values ± SD, n = 2 biologically independent samples) and <10-μm size fraction (n = 1) of the diazotroph community in NPSG and NEC stations, and (b) depth-integrated nifH gene abundance of five major cyanobacterial diazotrophs in the western North Pacific in summer and winter. The study area was divided into three regions, i.e. the central area of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG, red), the North Pacific Transition Zone (NPTZ, blue) and the North Equatorial Current affected area (NEC, grey).

Evidence for the importance of UCYN-B in driving high N2 fixation rates in the North Pacific is limited [26,28,37], with reports instead suggesting Trichodesmium and UCYN-A as the most important phylotypes [6,13,14,17,24]. This may be a result of previous investigations being largely restricted to either western boundary regions [38–40] or the Hawaiian Ocean Timeseries site [13,16,17,41]. Among the diazotrophic phylotypes we surveyed by quantitative nifH gene analysis, UCYN-B explained most of the variability of, and showed consistent spatial and temporal patterns with, measured bulk N2 fixation rates (R = 0.751 and P < 0.001; Fig. 1b and Figs S1 and S3). Furthermore, by using the reported average cell-specific N2 fixation rates of UCYN-B measured by nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS) [42–44], and an average UCYN-B nifH gene polyploidy copy number [26,45] (Note S1 and Table S3), we estimated that UCYN-B could contribute ∼90% (71.9%–115.1% 95% confidence interval) of the measured N2 fixation rates in the NPSG and NEC regions (Fig. S4 and Table S4). In contrast, we found Trichodesmium was only prevalent in regions near the western boundary of the North Pacific (station K2b), and UCYN-A was dominant at the North Pacific transition zone (NPTZ), north of the NPSG, where N2 fixation rates were relatively low (Fig. 1b, Table S2 and Fig. S1).

In addition to cyanobacterial diazotrophs, non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs (NCDs) have been found to be widely distributed in the global ocean, including the eastern Pacific Ocean [23,46–48]. Recent studies have reported N2 fixation by putative particle-attached NCDs in oxygenated surface waters [49], as well as by non-cyanobacterial N2-fixing symbionts in the tropical North Atlantic [50]. In our study, using metagenomic analysis and nifH gene amplicon sequencing, we found that Alpha- and Gamma-proteobacterium were the two main NCDs in the western North Pacific (Table S2 and Fig. S2). However, these NCDs were only dominant at stations where N2 fixation rates declined significantly (e.g. MR04_W) or were not detectable (e.g. K8a, K11a and K8a_W) (Figs S1 and S2).

Therefore, our study fills a major observational gap, and suggests that UCYN-B is primarily responsible for both the high overall diazotroph abundance and N2 fixation rates in the under-sampled western North Pacific, particularly in the NPSG and NEC regions [5,23].

Ecological niche and distribution of UCYN-B in the global ocean

To explore the potential global distribution of UCYN-B, our new observations were incorporated into a recently updated global dataset of depth-integrated nifH gene abundances [30], and used to evaluate the ecological niche of UCYN-B using GAMs. In total, 737 observations of depth-integrated nifH gene abundances in the global ocean were compiled (Fig. S5), and used in GAMs to estimate diazotroph niches along gradients of three key variables, i.e. sea surface temperature (SST), surface dissolved Fe (dFe) and surface dissolved phosphate (P) concentrations. These variables have been recognized as keys for regulating the distribution of major marine cyanobacterial diazotrophs globally (Note S2) [5,51]. In our analysis, the three parameters explain 54.9% (R2 = 0.539) of the variations in depth-integrated nifH gene abundance of UCYN-B, and all individually show significant relationships with UCYN-B (P < 0.001; Fig. 2a–c and Table S5). Significant correlations between SST, dFe and P and nifH gene abundance were also found for Trichodesmium, UCYN-A and Richelia (Fig. S6 and Table S5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Ecological niche and distribution of UCYN-B in the global ocean. (a–c) GAM-modeled response curves of UCYN-B against (a) surface temperature (SST), (b) dissolved Fe (dFe) and (c) phosphate (P) concentrations [Log10 (nifH gene abundance) ∼s(SST) + s(dFe) + s(P), (n = 605)]. UCYN-B appeared to correlate with all variables in the three-variable-GAM (P < 0.001). Our new observations were incorporated into a global database of depth-integrated nifH gene abundances [30], and used to conduct GAM analysis (Fig. S5, Note S2). The small dashes on the X-axis of (a) to (c) are empirical density distributions of observational covariates. (d) Predicted global distributions of UCYN-B nifH abundances using 10-year averaged monthly data for SST, dFe and P in CMIP6-CESM2 (re-gridded to a standard 1° × 1°). (e) The dominant regions of UCYN-B, UCYN-A, Trichodesmium and Richelia in the global ocean. The regions were defined as where the diazotroph type contributed to >75% of the total nifH gene abundance of the four diazotrophs surveyed and the total nifH gene abundance was higher than 104 copies m2.

The temperature response curve of UCYN-B was characterized by a high temperature niche with a relatively narrow range (25–30°C), and below ∼26°C the abundance of UCYN-B declined rapidly (Fig. 2a). These results agreed with experimentally observed optimal growth temperatures for UCYN-B [52,53]. The temperature response curve for Trichodesmium was similar to that of UCYN-B (Fig. S6), implying that these two species may share a similar latitudinal niche in oligotrophic (sub)tropical regions [5,54]. In contrast, UCYN-A and Richelia had broader niches at lower temperatures (Fig. S6), in line with observations of UCYN-A extending to temperate and polar regions [5,10].

We found that UCYN-B correlated non-linearly with dFe concentrations, declining sharply at dFe concentrations below 0.2 nM (Fig. 2b). At dFe concentrations above 0.2 nM, UCYN-B showed a much narrower niche than Trichodesmium and Richelia (Fig. 2b and Fig. S6). The different dFe niches for unicellular and larger-sized, filamentous-forming diazotrophs may be related to their respective Fe utilization strategies. For example, in addition to having a higher surface-to-volume ratio that favors Fe uptake [55,56], unicellular species such as UCYN-B may be more competitive in regions with lower dFe concentrations via their ability to move Fe between cellular components over day and night cycles [57].

The P response curve for UCYN-B was similar to dFe, peaking at low P concentrations (∼0.1 μM) and declining sharply at higher P concentrations (Fig. 2c). This behavior was also observed for the other three diazotrophs (Fig. S6), and probably results from competition by faster growing non-diazotrophs in regions with simultaneously elevated N supply [58]. However, at lower P concentrations the decline in UCYN-B was much more pronounced than that of larger-size diazotrophs, potentially implying that unicellular diazotrophs are mainly reliant on the supply of dissolved inorganic phosphorus. This observation is consistent with reports that UCYN-B has a weaker capability to use dissolved organic phosphorus than Trichodesmium [59,60]. This trend could also result from a co-variability of the low P regions with high dFe regions, where Trichodesmium dominates.

The GAMs in our study clearly showed the distinct niches of UCYN-B (and the other three major cyanobacterial diazotrophs) in the context of the variability in SST, dFe and P (Fig. 2a–c and Fig. S6). We thus employed the relationships produced by the GAMs to predict the global distribution of UCYN-B nifH abundances, using 10-year averaged data of monthly SST, dFe and P from an ocean biogeochemical model simulation (CMIP6-CESM2, Note S3). UCYN-B was generally restricted to tropical and subtropical oceans, and the abundances increased significantly toward the west of each oceanic region except the North Atlantic (Fig. 2d). Our GAMs-based projections generally agreed well with the data-driven model simulations [5], as all the four major cyanobacterial diazotrophs showed similar niches projected by the two different approaches. However, a major difference between our projections and previous simulations was that UCYN-B was more abundant (2–3 orders of magnitude higher) in our projections, especially in the (sub)tropical western Pacific Ocean and western Indian Ocean [5] (Fig. S7), where the diazotroph communities have previously been predicted to be dominated by Trichodesmium or by multiple species [4,5]. The difference was largely due to the increased observations in the global ocean [30] and the unprecedentedly high UCYN-B abundances in the western North Pacific as shown in this and a previous study [21], which allowed for a more accurate UCYN-B niche analysis and thus global projection.

UCYN-B driven hot spots of N2 fixation in the global ocean

Our observational and model results showed a previously unrecognized global dominance of UCYN-B, and its important contribution to N2 fixation in hot spots such as the (sub)tropical western North Pacific (Table 1 and Fig. 2d, e). These new findings imply that N inputs by UCYN-B may be of crucial importance in sustaining productivity in these regions as well as balancing oceanic N loss. To further assess this, we identified the areas with potentially high N2 fixation rates in UCYN-B dominant regions (>75% of total nifH gene abundance), including the tropical regions of the western North Pacific, western South Pacific Gyre, western Indian Ocean and eastern South Atlantic Gyre, using a minimal total nifH gene abundance threshold of 108 copies m2 (Fig. 3). Except for the western North Pacific which has been better characterized by this study and a previous study [21], assessment of N2 fixation rates and diazotroph abundances in these identified areas are limited (Fig. S8a), particularly in the Indian Ocean and the eastern South Atlantic. However, in the western South Pacific Gyre, high UCYN-B nifH gene transcript abundance (up to 1011 copies m−2) [61] and dominance of UCYN-B have been found, matching up with the region where we predict UCYN-B to dominate in a high N2 fixation rate area (Fig. S8b). In addition, the eastern South Atlantic Gyre has recently been identified as a hot spot of N2 fixation [62]. Finally, metagenomic results from Tara Oceans datasets indicate a high percentage (58%–84%) of UCYN-B in the cyanobacterial diazotroph community in the 0.8–5.0 μm size fraction at two surface stations (i.e. Tara-50 and Tara-51) around Madagascar in the South Indian Ocean [23]. Importantly, we found that none of these predicted UCYN-B dominated region areas overlapped with any regions previously predicted to have N2 fixation rates higher than 100 μmol N m2 d1 (Fig. 3), the designated lower threshold of the high N2 fixation category in the global database [41,63,64]. However, the potentially high-rate areas of Trichodesmium dominant regions (e.g. the tropical North Atlantic, western boundary of the Pacific Ocean and northern Indian Ocean) matched most of the previously modeled high N2 fixation regions [41,63]. These results emphasize (i) the reliability of the GAMs in projecting the diazotroph niches and distributions, and (ii) that UCYN-B's niche and the capability of this group to drive high N2 fixation rates were likely being missed in previous predictions due to limited field sampling.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

UCYN-B dominant regions with potential high N2 fixation rates. The delineated areas represent regions with total nifH gene abundance higher than 108 copies m2. Red, green, orange and purple denote regions dominated (defined as >75% of the total nifH gene abundance) by UCYN-B, Trichodesmium, UCYN-A and Richelia, respectively. The blue shaded areas denote regions predicted to have N2 fixation rates >100 μmol N m2 d1, the lower threshold of the high N2 fixation category in the global database [41,63,64].

Our new N2 fixation observations from the western North Pacific in this study were incorporated into the global N2 fixation database [30], to re-evaluate the total N2 fixation flux in the UCYN-B dominated, high N2 fixation rate area (nifH >108 copies m2 and N2 fixation >100 μmol N m2 d1) in the western North Pacific. The calculated mean rates in this area were 112 and 192 μmol N m2 d1 for geometric and arithmetic means (Table S6), respectively, higher than 87 and 177 μmol N m−2 d−1 estimated from the original global database [30] (not including observations in ref. [21]). Furthermore, in view of the potential underestimation of N2 fixation rates obtained using the original 15N2 gas bubble method [65,66], excluding these observations (alongside those measured by the acetylene reduction assay) produced much higher average rates of 142 (geometric) and 197 (arithmetic) μmol N m2 d1 (Table S6). Multiplying these N2 fixation rates by an area of 7.2 × 106 km2 (area in the North Pacific highlighted with a red line in Fig. 3), resulted in a total N flux of 5.2 (geometric, or 7.2 for arithmetic) Tg N yr−1 (Table 2 and Table S6).

Table 2.

Estimation of N2 fixation flux in the western North Pacific and three other potential UCYN-B dominated regions. Geometric estimates are in bold, and arithmetic estimates are shown in parentheses. The observed and three potential regions refer to red line highlighted areas in the western North Pacific, western South Pacific, Indian Ocean and eastern South Atlantic (Fig. 3). Since observational data are only available in the western North Pacific (Fig. S8a), the average N2 fixation rate (142 for geometric and 197 for arithmetic μmol N m−2 d−1, Table S6) measured using 15N2 dissolution method in this and previous studies [21,67,68] in the western North Pacific was used to estimate the flux in these regions.

Regions Area (× 106 km2) Estimated flux based on 3° × 3° re-gridded datasets in the global database [30] (Tg N yr−1) Re-evaluated flux based on N2 fixation rates measured in refs. [21,67,68] and this study (Tg N yr−1) Additional flux (Tg N yr−1)
Observed region
 Western North Pacific 7.18 4.3 (4.7) 5.2 (7.2) 0.9 (2.5)
Potential regions
 South Pacific 2.20 2.1 (2.4) 1.6 (2.2) −0.5 (−0.2)
 Indian Ocean 5.10 0.3 (0.3) 3.7 (5.1) 3.4 (4.8)
 South Atlantic 0.45 0.1 (0.1) 0.3 (0.5) 0.2 (0.4)
Total predicted regions 14.93 6.8 (7.5) 10.8 (15.0) 4.0 (7.5)

In the other three UCYN-B-dominated, high N2 fixation rate areas (7.7 × 106 km2) predicted by the GAMs (Fig. 3), the number of N2 fixation rate observations is very limited (Fig. S8). Using the average rate we measured in the western North Pacific, we estimated that collectively these three predicted UCYN-B dominated hot spots alongside the western North Pacific could potentially contribute a total of 10.8 (geometric, or 15.0 for arithmetic) Tg N yr1 to the global marine N2 fixation budget (Table 2). The N2 fixation fluxes of these regions were also estimated based on 3° × 3° re-gridded datasets from the global database [30] as a comparison (Table 2). Our re-evaluated N2 fixation fluxes showed an additional N input of 4.0 (geometric, or 7.5 for arithmetic) Tg N yr−1, an ∼60%–100% increase from the estimate based on the global database [30]. The increase is more pronounced in the previously under-sampled regions, especially the western Indian Ocean which showed an additional N2 fixation flux of 3.4 (geometric, or 4.8 for arithmetic) Tg N yr−1, an increase of more than 10-fold (Table 2).

CONCLUSIONS

N2 fixation by diazotrophic bacteria is a crucial source of biologically available N, supporting primary production in the global ocean [4]. Our study demonstrates that UCYN-B can dominate the diazotroph community and establish hot spots of N2 fixation, contributing significantly to global marine N2 fixation. Particularly, in the predicted UCYN-B dominated western Indian Ocean, a highly under sampled region, it may attribute an additional 45%–52% of N2 fixation for the whole Indian Ocean (7.5 geometric, or 9.2 Tg N yr−1 for arithmetic [69]). Future changes in environmental conditions will likely alter the spatial extent of the niches of the different diazotrophs, impacting both overall rates and fates of diazotroph fixed N [58], with knock-on impacts on ocean productivity and biogeochemical cycles [70]. Continued exploration of diazotrophs and N2 fixation throughout unsampled regions of the global ocean remains important in order to better understand and predict such changes.

METHODS

Study location and sample collection

Two GEOTRACES Process Study cruises were conducted aboard the R/V Tan Kah Kee from July to August 2020 and December 2020 to February 2021, respectively, in the (sub)tropical western North Pacific. Seawater samples were collected using a rosette of Niskin® bottles equipped with SBE 911plus CTD (Seabird, Bellevue, USA) including a photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) sensor (Biospherical Instruments, San Diego, USA), which also recorded percentage light intensity relative to the surface and seawater temperature. Water samples were collected from six different depths (corresponding to 100%, 50%, 25%, 10%, 1% and 0.1% PAR) for N2 fixation rate incubations and for sampling for nifH gene quantification. Surface water was collected for nifH gene sequencing and metagenomics analysis. Information of sampling locations and types of analysis are listed in Table S1.

N2 fixation rate measurement

N2 fixation rates were determined using the 15N2 gas dissolution method [66]. Prior to incubation, 15N2 pre-dissolved seawater was prepared using 15N2 gas (98.9 atom%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Lot #: I-19 197/AR0586172, I-21 065/AR0664758). Specifically, seawater filtered through a 0.22-μm polypropylene calyx capsule filter (GVS S.p.A., Bologna, Italy) was collected around the observation sites and then degassed using a Sterapore membrane unit (20M1500A: Mitsubishi Rayon Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). After this, 20 mL of 15N2 gas was injected into a Tedlar® PVF gas-tight plastic bag (Delin Gas Packing Co., Ltd, Dalian, China) that contained 2 liters of the degassed seawater. The bag was gently tapped until the gas bubble was completely dissolved. The 15N2 pre-dissolved seawater was prepared at least 2 hours before initiation of the incubation. For bulk N2 fixation rate incubations, 100 mL 15N2-enriched seawater was added to duplicate 4.5-liter Nalgene polycarbonate bottles already filled with seawater directly from Niskin® bottles. For size-fractionated (<10 μm) N2 fixation rate incubations, 60 mL 15N2-enriched seawater was added to a 2.3-liter bottle filled with seawater that was first filtered through a 10-μm membrane (TCTP04700 IsoporeTM hydrophilic membrane, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove large diazotrophs. All bottles were then incubated for 24 hours in on-deck incubators screened at six different levels of PAR (100%, 50%, 25%, 10%, 1% and 0.1% PAR) and flushed continuously with surface seawater. The upper euphotic zone depth-integrated N2 fixation rates were calculated by the trapezoidal integration method [71].

Detection limits and error propagation

Particulate nitrogen (PN) concentrations and 15N isotopic ratios were quantified using an EA IsoLinkTM IRMS system (a Flash IRMS elemental analyzer coupled to a Delta V isotope ratio mass spectrometer, Thermo Scientific). N2 fixation rates were calculated as described by Montoya et al. [72]. Limits of detection (LOD) was calculated following the best practice described by White et al. [73] (Supplementary Data 1). Specifically, LOD-1 was derived from the minimal detectable difference in the 15N atom% of PN (minAPN) that can be resolved by the EA-IRMS given a sample PN mass. In our study, the PN masses of 82.8% of the bulk incubation samples were >10 μg, but the PN masses of most <10-µm-fraction incubation samples were in the range of 4–10 μg. For the PN mass <10 μg, the minAPN was three times the standard deviation of five APN measurements (0.00017 atom%) of low-mass N standards (1.52–3.52 μg), yielding a minAPN of 0.0005 atom% (n = 5, Table S7), which was lower than the generic value of 0.00146 atom% [72]. We thus used the 0.00146 atom% as the minAPN in the LOD-1 calculation for all samples. LOD-2 was also calculated by employing standard error propagation based on the variability observed between duplicate samples [73].

Measurement of 15N2 atom% was not conducted for the summer cruise (July to August 2020). For the winter cruise (December 2020 to February 2021), the samples for measurement of 15N2 atom% were collected into ExetainerTM vials without a headspace, kept at 4°C, and then measured using a membrane inlet mass spectrometry (Prismaplus MIMS200, Bay Instruments, USA). The average value of 15N2 atom% for incubation of bulk N2 fixation rate measurement was 1.41 atom% with a low standard deviation of 0.083 atom% (n = 81). The average value for size-fractionated (<10 μm) incubation was 1.56 atom% with standard deviation of 0.077 atom% (n = 27). Given the consistent methodology applied in the summer and winter cruises, we used 15N2 enrichment values of 1.41 and 1.56 atom% in calculating bulk and size-fractionated N2 fixation rates, respectively. For the error propagation analysis, a fixed standard deviation of 0.083 atom% was used for bulk N2 fixation rate measurement. Error propagation analysis was not performed for size-fractionated N2 fixation rate measurements, due to lack of replicates as a result of limited seawater samples available for incubation on the cruises. Data are shown in Supplementary Data 1.

nifH gene sequencing and quantification

A total of 4.5L in-situ seawater samples were filtered onto 0.22 μm pore-sized polyethersulfone (PES) membranes (Supor-200, Pall Gelman), which were subsequently frozen in liquid N2 until further analysis. To extract DNA, membranes were cut into pieces under sterile conditions and then extracted using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol with minor modification by adding 20 μL lysozyme (20 mg/mL) for cell lysis. The concentration and purity of the genomic DNA were detected using a Qubit Fluorometer (QubitTM 4 Invitrogen) and a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific 2000/2000c), respectively.

Surface sea water samples from six stations in summer and four stations in winter were collected for nifH gene DNA sequencing. Among them, four stations in summer (K2b, WPS, MR04 and M22) and two stations in winter (M22_W and K11a_W) had high N2 fixation rates. Two stations in summer (K11a and K8a) and two stations in winter (MR04_W and K8a_W) that had very low or no detectable N2 fixation rates were included as comparison (see Table S1 for station information). nifH gene amplification was performed using previously reported nested PCR protocols [74,75]. Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) according to the standard protocols by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sequence reads were demultiplexed using an in-house perl script, quality-filtered by fastp version 0.19.6 [76] and then merged by FLASH version 1.2.7 [77]. The optimized sequences were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UPARSE 7.1 [78,79] at 97% nucleotide similarity. The most abundant sequence of each OTU was selected as the representative sequence. The taxonomy of the representative sequences was identified by RDP Classifier version 2.2 [80] against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis was applied to samples collected from six different depths (corresponding to 100%, 50%, 25%, 10%, 1% and 0.1% PAR) for 26 stations (Table S1). Five prominent nifH phylotypes including Trichodesmium, UCYN-A1, UCYN-A2/A3, UCYN-B and Richelia associated with Rhizosolenia (Het-1), which were identified by nifH amplicon sequencing, were quantified using previously designed primers and probe sets (Table S8). Triplicate qPCR reactions were run for each DNA sample on a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories). A set of standards corresponding to between 100 and 106 copies per well were amplified in each 96-well plate. The qPCR efficiencies were between 93.3%–108.8%, with R2 value >0.99. The detection limit was 25 nifH copies per liter and the quantification limit was 250 nifH copies per liter. No signals were detected in negative controls. The nifH gene standards were obtained by cloning the environmental sequences from previous samples collected from the South China Sea.

Metagenomic analysis

Surface seawater samples were collected for metagenomics analysis at stations K2b, M22, WPS, K8a and M35 (see Table S1 for station information). M22, WPS and K2b all had high N2 fixation rates, while a Trichodesmium bloom occurred at K2b when sampling. K8a had no detectable N2 fixation rate and was included as a comparison. M35 located at the higher latitude and had a low N2 fixation rate. Seawaters were sampled at two size fractions, i.e. 0.2–3 μm and 3–200 μm. DNA was extracted as described above, and the metagenomics libraries were prepared using an Automation System (MGI, MGISP-960, China) with MGIEasy Universal DNA Library Prep Set (MGI 1000006 986, China), using an input of 1 μg of sheared genomic DNA. Non-redundant nifH genes were constructed, and then annotated for downstream analysis (see Note S4 for detailed description).

Supplementary Material

nwaf337_Supplemental_Files

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank Y. Zhou, W. Xiao and W. Wang for helpful discussions, W. Tang for sharing datasets and M. Chen for providing access to the MIMS. The authors gratefully acknowledge the captain and crew of the R/V Tan Kah Kee for their help during the cruises.

Biography

Kuroshio intrusion-affected South China Sea (summer) [31]c

Contributor Information

Ruotong Jiang, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Haizheng Hong, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Zuozhu Wen, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Xinran Yu, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Thomas J Browning, Marine Biogeochemistry Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel D-24148, Germany.

Ze Chen, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Yanpeng Shang, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Xin Liu, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Zhimian Cao, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Eric P Achterberg, Marine Biogeochemistry Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel D-24148, Germany.

Minhan Dai, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Dalin Shi, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Materials. The fastq files of nifH sequencing in this study have been deposited in NCBI (Accession: PRJNA992762). All other source data are provided in the Supplementary Data. Correspondence and requests for data should be addressed to the corresponding author.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42421004), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFF0805000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42525601 and 41890802), the ‘111’ Project (BP0719030), the New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the XPLORER Prize to D.S. and the PhD Fellowship of the State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University to R.J.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

D.S. and H.H. designed the research. R.J., Z.W., Z.C., Y.S., X.L. and Z.M.C. performed the experiments. R.J., D.S., H.H., Z.W., X.Y. and Y.S. analyzed the data. R.J., H.H., D.S., Z.W. and T.J.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on and revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Moore  CM, Mills  MM, Arrigo  KR  et al.  Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation. Nat Geosci  2013; 6: 701–10. 10.1038/ngeo1765 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gruber  N. The marine nitrogen cycle: overview and challenges. In: Capone  DG, Bronk  DA, Mulholland  MR  et al. (eds.). Nitrogen in the Marine Environment (Second Edition). San Diego: Academic Press, 2008, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gruber  N, Galloway  JN. An earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature  2008; 451: 293–6. 10.1038/nature06592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zehr  JP, Capone  DG. Changing perspectives in marine nitrogen fixation. Science  2020; 368: eaay9514. 10.1126/science.aay9514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tang  W, Cassar  N. Data-driven modeling of the distribution of diazotrophs in the global ocean. Geophys Res Lett  2019; 46: 12258–69. 10.1029/2019GL084376 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Capone  DG, Zehr  JP, Paerl  HW  et al.  Trichodesmium, a globally significant marine cyanobacterium. Science  1997; 276: 1221–9. 10.1126/science.276.5316.1221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Follett  CL, Dutkiewicz  S, Karl  DM  et al.  Seasonal resource conditions favor a summertime increase in North Pacific diatom–diazotroph associations. ISME J  2018; 12: 1543–57. 10.1038/s41396-017-0012-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Foster  RA, Kuypers  MMM, Vagner  T  et al.  Nitrogen fixation and transfer in open ocean diatom–cyanobacterial symbioses. ISME J  2011; 5: 1484–93. 10.1038/ismej.2011.26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mahaffey  C, Michaels  AF, Capone  DG. The conundrum of marine N2 fixation. Am J Sci  2005; 305: 546–95. 10.2475/ajs.305.6-8.546 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Shiozaki  T, Fujiwara  A, Inomura  K  et al.  Biological nitrogen fixation detected under Antarctic sea ice. Nat Geosci  2020; 13: 729–32. 10.1038/s41561-020-00651-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sohm  JA, Hilton  JA, Noble  AE  et al.  Nitrogen fixation in the South Atlantic gyre and the Benguela upwelling system. Geophys Res Lett  2011; 38: L16608. 10.1029/2011GL048315 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wen  Z, Lin  W, Shen  R  et al.  Nitrogen fixation in two coastal upwelling regions of the Taiwan Strait. Sci Rep  2017; 7: 17601. 10.1038/s41598-017-18006-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Church  MJ, Mahaffey  C, Letelier  RM  et al.  Physical forcing of nitrogen fixation and diazotroph community structure in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Glob Biogeochem Cycle  2009; 23: GB2020. 10.1029/2008GB003418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gradoville  MR, Bombar  D, Crump  BC  et al.  Diversity and activity of nitrogen-fixing communities across ocean basins. Limnol Oceanogr  2017; 62: 1895–909. 10.1002/lno.10542 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Karl  D, Letelier  R, Hebel  D  et al.  Trichodesmium blooms and new nitrogen in the North Pacific gyre. In: Carpenter  EJ, Capone  DG, Rueter  JG. (eds.). Marine Pelagic Cyanobacteria: Trichodesmium and Other Diazotrophs. Dordrecht: Springer, 1992, 219–37. 10.1007/978-94-015-7977-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. White  AE, Watkins-Brandt  KS, Church  MJ. Temporal variability of Trichodesmium spp. and diatom-diazotroph assemblages in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Front Mar Sci  2018; 5:  27. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gradoville  MR, Farnelid  H, White  AE  et al.  Latitudinal constraints on the abundance and activity of the cyanobacterium UCYN-A and other marine diazotrophs in the North Pacific. Limnol Oceanogr  2020; 65: 1858–75. 10.1002/lno.11423 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kitajima  S, Furuya  K, Hashihama  F  et al.  Latitudinal distribution of diazotrophs and their nitrogen fixation in the tropical and subtropical western North Pacific. Limnol Oceanogr  2009; 54: 537–47. 10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0537 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shiozaki  T, Bombar  D, Riemann  L  et al.  Basin scale variability of active diazotrophs and nitrogen fixation in the North Pacific, from the tropics to the subarctic Bering Sea. Glob Biogeochem Cycle  2017; 31: 996–1009. 10.1002/2017GB005681 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shiozaki  T, Furuya  K, Kodama  T  et al.  New estimation of N2 fixation in the western and central Pacific Ocean and its marginal seas. Glob Biogeochem Cycle  2010; 24: GB1015. 10.1029/2009GB003620 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wen  Z, Browning  TJ, Cai  Y  et al.  Nutrient regulation of biological nitrogen fixation across the tropical western North Pacific. Sci Adv  2022; 8: eabl7564. 10.1126/sciadv.abl7564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yu  X, Wen  Z, Jiang  R  et al.  Assessing N2 fixation flux and its controlling factors in the (sub)tropical western North Pacific through high-resolution observations. Limnol Oceanogr Lett  2024; 9: 716–24. 10.1002/lol2.10404 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Karlusich  JJ, Pelletier  E, Lombard  F  et al.  Global distribution patterns of marine nitrogen-fixers by imaging and molecular methods. Nat Commun  2021; 12: 4160. 10.1038/s41467-021-24299-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zehr  JP, Waterbury  JB, Turner  PJ  et al.  Unicellular cyanobacteria fix N2 in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature  2001; 412: 635–8. 10.1038/35088063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Dekaezemacker  J, Bonnet  S. Sensitivity of N2 fixation to combined nitrogen forms (NO3 and NH4+) in two strains of the marine diazotroph Crocosphaera watsonii (Cyanobacteria). Mar Ecol Prog Ser  2011; 438: 33–46. 10.3354/meps09297 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wilson  ST, Aylward  FO, Ribalet  F  et al.  Coordinated regulation of growth, activity and transcription in natural populations of the unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Crocosphaera. Nat Microbiol  2017; 2: 17118. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bonnet  S, Benavides  M, Le Moigne  FAC  et al.  Diazotrophs are overlooked contributors to carbon and nitrogen export to the deep ocean. ISME J  2023; 17: 47–58. 10.1038/s41396-022-01319-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Turk-Kubo  KA, Henke  BA, Gradoville  MR  et al.  Seasonal and spatial patterns in diazotroph community composition at Station ALOHA. Front Mar Sci  2023; 10: 1130158. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1130158 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Masuda  T, Mareš  J, Shiozaki  T  et al.  Crocosphaera watsonii—A widespread nitrogen-fixing unicellular marine cyanobacterium. J Phycol  2024; 60: 604–20. 10.1111/jpy.13450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Shao  Z, Xu  Y, Wang  H  et al.  Global oceanic diazotroph database version 2 and elevated estimate of global oceanic N2 fixation. Earth Syst Sci Data  2023; 15: 3673–709. 10.5194/essd-15-3673-2023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lu  Y, Wen  Z, Shi  D  et al.  Biogeography of N2 fixation influenced by the western boundary current intrusion in the South China Sea. JGR Oceans  2019; 124: 6983–96. 10.1029/2018JC014781 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Böttjer  D, Dore  JE, Karl  DM  et al.  Temporal variability of nitrogen fixation and particulate nitrogen export at Station ALOHA. Limnol Oceanogr  2017; 62: 200–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Berthelot  H, Benavides  M, Moisander  PH  et al.  High-nitrogen fixation rates in the particulate and dissolved pools in the Western Tropical Pacific (Solomon and Bismarck Seas). Geophys Res Lett  2017; 44: 8414–23. 10.1002/2017GL073856 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. García  N, Raimbault  P, Sandroni  V. Seasonal nitrogen fixation and primary production in the Southwest Pacific: nanoplankton diazotrophy and transfer of nitrogen to picoplankton organisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser  2007; 343: 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Capone  DG, Burns  JA, Montoya  JP  et al.  Nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium spp.: an important source of new nitrogen to the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. Glob Biogeochem Cycle  2005; 19: GB2024. 10.1029/2004GB002331 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Martínez-Pérez  C, Mohr  W, Löscher  CR  et al.  The small unicellular diazotrophic symbiont, UCYN-A, is a key player in the marine nitrogen cycle. Nat Microbiol  2016; 1: 16163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Robidart  JC, Church  MJ, Ryan  JP  et al.  Ecogenomic sensor reveals controls on N2-fixing microorganisms in the North Pacific Ocean. ISME J  2014; 8: 1175–85. 10.1038/ismej.2013.244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Chen  M, Lu  Y, Jiao  N  et al.  Biogeographic drivers of diazotrophs in the western Pacific Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr  2019; 64: 1403–21. 10.1002/lno.11123 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sato  T, Shiozaki  T, Taniuchi  Y  et al.  Nitrogen fixation and diazotroph community in the subarctic sea of Japan and sea of Okhotsk. JGR Oceans  2021; 126: e2020JC017071. 10.1029/2020JC017071 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Shiozaki  T, Kondo  Y, Yuasa  D  et al.  Distribution of major diazotrophs in the surface water of the Kuroshio from northeastern Taiwan to south of mainland Japan. J Plankton Res  2018; 40: 407–19. 10.1093/plankt/fby027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Tang  W, Li  Z, Cassar  N. Machine learning estimates of global marine nitrogen fixation. JGR Biogeosci  2019; 124: 717–30. 10.1029/2018JG004828 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bonnet  S, Caffin  M, Berthelot  H  et al.  In-depth characterization of diazotroph activity across the western tropical South Pacific hotspot of N2 fixation (OUTPACE cruise). Biogeosciences  2018; 15: 4215–32. 10.5194/bg-15-4215-2018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Krupke  A, Musat  N, LaRoche  J  et al.  In situ identification and N2 and C fixation rates of uncultivated cyanobacteria populations. Syst Appl Microbiol  2013; 36: 259–71. 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Foster  RA, Sztejrenszus  S, Kuypers  MMM. Measuring carbon and N2 fixation in field populations of colonial and free-living unicellular cyanobacteria using nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry1. J Phycol  2013; 49: 502–16. 10.1111/jpy.12057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Meiler  S, Britten  GL, Dutkiewicz  S  et al.  Constraining uncertainties of diazotroph biogeography from nifH gene abundance. Limnol Oceanogr  2022; 67: 816–29. 10.1002/lno.12036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Turk-Kubo  KA, Gradoville  MR, Cheung  S  et al.  Non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs: global diversity, distribution, ecophysiology, and activity in marine waters. FEMS Microbiol Rev  2023; 47: fuac046. 10.1093/femsre/fuac046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Delmont  TO, Pierella Karlusich  JJ, Veseli  I  et al.  Heterotrophic bacterial diazotrophs are more abundant than their cyanobacterial counterparts in metagenomes covering most of the sunlit ocean. ISME J  2022; 16: 927–36. 10.1038/s41396-021-01135-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Delmont  TO, Quince  C, Shaiber  A  et al.  Nitrogen-fixing populations of planctomycetes and proteobacteria are abundant in surface ocean metagenomes. Nat Microbiol  2018; 3: 804–13. 10.1038/s41564-018-0176-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Harding  KJ, Turk-Kubo  KA, Mak  EWK  et al.  Cell-specific measurements show nitrogen fixation by particle-attached putative non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Nat Commun  2022; 13: 6979. 10.1038/s41467-022-34585-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Tschitschko  B, Esti  M, Philippi  M  et al.  Rhizobia–diatom symbiosis fixes missing nitrogen in the ocean. Nature  2024; 630: 899–904. 10.1038/s41586-024-07495-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wang  W-L, Moore  JK, Martiny  AC  et al.  Convergent estimates of marine nitrogen fixation. Nature  2019; 566: 205–11. 10.1038/s41586-019-0911-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Moisander  PH, Beinart  RA, Hewson  I  et al.  Unicellular cyanobacterial distributions broaden the oceanic N2 fixation domain. Science  2010; 327: 1512–4. 10.1126/science.1185468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Fu  F-X, Yu  E, Garcia  N  et al.  Differing responses of marine N2 fixers to warming and consequences for future diazotroph community structure. Aquat Microb Ecol  2014; 72: 33–46. 10.3354/ame01683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Stenegren  M, Caputo  A, Berg  C  et al.  Distribution and drivers of symbiotic and free-living diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the western tropical South Pacific. Biogeosciences  2018; 15: 1559–78. 10.5194/bg-15-1559-2018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Hudson  RJM, Morel  FMM. Iron transport in marine phytoplankton: kinetics of cellular and medium coordination reactions. Limnol Oceanogr  1990; 35: 1002–20. 10.4319/lo.1990.35.5.1002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Jacq  V, Ridame  C, L'Helguen  S  et al.  Response of the unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium Crocosphaera watsonii to iron limitation. PLoS One  2014; 9: e86749. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Saito  MA, Bertrand  EM, Dutkiewicz  S  et al.  Iron conservation by reduction of metalloenzyme inventories in the marine diazotroph Crocosphaera watsonii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2011; 108: 2184–9. 10.1073/pnas.1006943108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ward  BA, Dutkiewicz  S, Moore  CM  et al.  Iron, phosphorus, and nitrogen supply ratios define the biogeography of nitrogen fixation. Limnol Oceanogr  2013; 58: 2059–75. 10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Dyhrman  ST, Chappell  PD, Haley  ST  et al.  Phosphonate utilization by the globally important marine diazotroph Trichodesmium. Nature  2006; 439: 68–71. 10.1038/nature04203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Dyhrman  ST, Haley  ST. Phosphorus scavenging in the unicellular marine diazotroph crocosphaera watsonii. Appl Environ Microb  2006; 72: 1452–8. 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1452-1458.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Moisander  PH, Serros  T, Paerl  RW  et al.  Gammaproteobacterial diazotrophs and nifH gene expression in surface waters of the South Pacific Ocean. ISME J  2014; 8: 1962–73. 10.1038/ismej.2014.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Marshall  T, Granger  J, Casciotti  KL  et al.  The Angola Gyre is a hotspot of dinitrogen fixation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Commun Earth Environ  2022; 3: 151. 10.1038/s43247-022-00474-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Luo  YW, Lima  ID, Karl  DM  et al.  Data-based assessment of environmental controls on global marine nitrogen fixation. Biogeosciences  2014; 11: 691–708. 10.5194/bg-11-691-2014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Luo  YW, Doney  SC, Anderson  LA  et al.  Database of diazotrophs in global ocean: abundance, biomass and nitrogen fixation rates. Earth Syst Sci Data  2012; 4: 47–73. 10.5194/essd-4-47-2012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Dabundo  R, Lehmann  MF, Treibergs  L  et al.  The contamination of commercial 15N2 gas stocks with 15N-labeled nitrate and ammonium and consequences for nitrogen fixation measurements. PLoS One  2014; 9: e110335. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Mohr  W, Grosskopf  T, Wallace  DWR  et al.  Methodological underestimation of oceanic nitrogen fixation rates. PLoS One  2010; 5: e12583. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wen  Z, Browning  TJ, Dai  R  et al.  The response of diazotrophs to nutrient amendment in the South China Sea and western North Pacific. Biogeosciences  2022; 19: 5237–50. 10.5194/bg-19-5237-2022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Liu  J, Zhou  L, Li  J  et al.  Effect of mesoscale eddies on diazotroph community structure and nitrogen fixation rates in the South China Sea. Reg Stud Mar Sci  2020; 35: 101106. [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chowdhury  S, Raes  E, Hörstmann  C  et al.  Diazotrophy in the Indian Ocean: current understanding and future perspectives. Limnol Oceanogr Lett  2023; 8: 707–22. 10.1002/lol2.10343 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Séférian  R, Berthet  S, Yool  A  et al.  Tracking improvement in simulated marine biogeochemistry between CMIP5 and CMIP6. Curr Clim Change Rep  2020; 6: 95–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Butcher  JC. Numerical differential equation methods. In: Butcher  JC (ed.). Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008, 51–135. 10.1002/9780470753767 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Montoya  JP, Voss  M, Kahler  P  et al.  A simple, high-precision, high-sensitivity tracer assay for N2 fixation. Appl Environ Microb  1996; 62: 986–93. 10.1128/aem.62.3.986-993.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. White  AE, Granger  J, Selden  C  et al.  A critical review of the 15N2 tracer method to measure diazotrophic production in pelagic ecosystems. Limnol Ocean Method  2020; 18: 129–47. 10.1002/lom3.10353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Zehr  JP, Turner  PJ. Nitrogen fixation: nitrogenase genes and gene expression. Method Microbiol  2001; 30: 271–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Bentzon-Tilia  M, Traving  SJ, Mantikci  M  et al.  Significant N2 fixation by heterotrophs, photoheterotrophs and heterocystous cyanobacteria in two temperate estuaries. ISME J  2015; 9: 273–85. 10.1038/ismej.2014.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Chen  S, Zhou  Y, Chen  Y  et al.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics  2018; 34: i884–90. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Magoč  T, Salzberg  SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics  2011; 27: 2957–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Stackebrandt  E, Goebel  BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol  1994; 44: 846–9. 10.1099/00207713-44-4-846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Edgar  RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods  2013; 10: 996–8. 10.1038/nmeth.2604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Wang  Q, Garrity  GM, Tiedje  JM  et al.  Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol  2007; 73: 5261–7. 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nwaf337_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Materials. The fastq files of nifH sequencing in this study have been deposited in NCBI (Accession: PRJNA992762). All other source data are provided in the Supplementary Data. Correspondence and requests for data should be addressed to the corresponding author.


Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES