Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 Sep 24:2025.09.22.677398. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.09.22.677398

Regulation of TCR-induced Transcriptional Kinetics by Interleukin 2-inducible T Cell Kinase (ITK) in CD8+ T cells

Josh Hunkins 1, Zoe K Bedrosian 1, Uddeep Chaudhury 1, Alayna Rosales 1, Mary J Michaels 1, Masahiro Ono 2, Abhyudai Singh 3, Leslie J Berg 1
PMCID: PMC12485779  PMID: 41040252

Abstract

The initial activation of naïve CD8+ T cells induces three major transcription factor pathways, NFAT, NFκB, and AP-1, predominantly regulated by T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Downstream of the TCR, the Tec family tyrosine kinase ITK modulates the transcriptional response in T cells by differentially affecting the kinetics and magnitude of activation of these three transcription factors. How signaling through ITK regulates the duration and/or termination of TCR signaling has not been investigated. To address this, we utilized the “Nr4a3-Tocky” reporter mouse which provides information on the kinetics of TCR signaling over time courses from hours to days. OT-I CD8+ Nr4a3-Tocky T cells were stimulated with peptide ligands of varying affinities, and cells were assayed for a panel of surface and intracellular markers of activation and differentiation at multiple time points post-stimulation. As previously reported, at early time points ITK signaling enhanced the kinetics and magnitude of expression of these markers. At later time points the absence of ITK led to persistent expression of several proteins, indicating an important role for ITK in the termination of TCR-dependent transcriptional responses. Using a dual ITK/ RLK inhibitor (PRN694) at 24h post OVA peptide stimulation it was found that this function of ITK was required in the first 24 hours. These findings reveal a possible key negative regulatory mechanism that is programmed in the first day of activation but impacts CD8+ T cell gene expression patterns days later.

One Sentence Summary Statement

The Tec family tyrosine kinase ITK differentially regulates early and late T-cell receptor transcriptional responses.

Introduction

The initial signals a naïve CD8+ T cell receives through its TCR, coupled with integrated signals from costimulatory receptors and cytokines/chemokines, regulate the differential expression of genes responsible for determining T cell fate and function (1, 2). Stimulation of the TCR leads to activation of downstream kinases that promotes transcriptional responses dominated by three transcription factor families, NFAT, NFκB, and AP-1 (36). An essential step in this pathway is the activation of phospholipase C-γ1 (PLCγ1), which cleaves the membrane phosphoinositide PIP2 into two second messengers, diacylglycerol (DAG) and IP3. PLCγ1 is activated by recruitment to the LAT-SLP76 adapter complex, a signaling complex rapidly assembled following TCR stimulation, and by PLCγ1 tyrosine phosphorylation (710). The Tec family tyrosine kinase ITK, while not essential for all PLCγ1 activation, is responsible for phosphorylating PLCγ1 and enhancing its activity, leading to increased production of DAG and IP3 following TCR stimulation (7, 11). DAG activates the Ras-Erk MAP-kinase pathway, ultimately leading to the induction of active AP-1. DAG also binds to and activates Protein kinase C-θ (PKCθ) to initiate the canonical NF-κB transcriptional response. The second messenger IP3 promotes calcium influx into the T cell, leading to calcineurin activation and the activation of NFAT (12).

Stimulation of T cells with antigens of varying affinities or at varying doses is known to impact the kinetics of T cell activation. This results from variations in the duration of TCR:pMHC binding (1315) as well as the localization and density of TCR microclusters (1618). Costimulatory signals, such as those mediated by CD28 or by cytokines, can also alter T cell activation kinetics (1922). The activities of TCR proximal kinases such as Lck, ZAP-70, ITK, and the rate of LAT phosphorylation (23, 24) also contribute to the rate of T cell activation (25, 26). As a result, increases in antigen affinity have been shown to decrease the time to the initial round of T cell proliferation in vivo (27) and in vitro (28).

In our earlier studies, we examined how variations in TCR signaling translated into changes in the three transcriptional pathways downstream of PLCγ1 (1). We measured the kinetics and magnitude of NFAT and NF-kB(p65) nuclear translocation, and of ERK-MAP-kinase (Erk-MAPK) phosphorylation using OT-I TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells. OT-I cells recognize a peptide of chicken ovalbumin (OVA-N4 (257-264); SIINFEKL) bound to MHC class I (Kb) with high affinity. Variants of this peptide with single amino acid substitutions at the 4th position are recognized with lower affinities by the OT-I TCR, and when used to stimulate T cells produce weaker TCR signals than those generated by recognition of the high affinity N4 peptide (27). Overall, we found that weaker TCR stimulation using the altered peptide variants SIITFEKL (OVA-T4) and SIIGFEKL (OVA-G4) caused a profound reduction in the rate of onset of downstream TCR responses (1). In addition, and consistent with previous studies (5, 25, 29), we demonstrated that both NFAT and Erk-MAPK activation show all-or-nothing ‘digital’ responses to stimulation, such that all responding cells had the same amount of nuclear NFAT or p-Erk-MAPK regardless of the dose or affinity of the stimulating antigen. In contrast, NF-kB(p65) activation was ‘graded’ with responding cells having varying amounts of nuclear p65 in correlation to the strength of the TCR signal they received. This prior study also examined the contribution of ITK signaling to the activation of NFAT, NF-kB(p65) and Erk-MAPK. We found that ITK had no impact on either the kinetics or magnitude of Erk-MAPK activation. Examination of NFAT activation showed that ITK signaling was only required when cells were stimulated with low affinity antigen, and primarily impacted the kinetics of NFAT nuclear localization and the percentage of T cells in the population that activated NFAT (1). In contrast, ITK had a major effect on NF-kB(p65) activation, affecting the magnitude of nuclear p65 evident in each cell and under all TCR stimulation conditions (1).

To date, the role of variations in TCR signal strength on the kinetics of T cell gene expression has been studied at early time-points and has focused on examining how proximal signaling events lead to alterations in the onset or initiation of T cell activation marker expression (1, 2, 14, 2527, 3032). However, linkage of the PLCγ1-dependent transcriptional pathways to changes in specific gene expression responses has not been examined in detail. Furthermore, as each of the downstream surface and intracellular markers commonly used to study T cell activation vary in their dependence on these early transcription factor pathways (3336), perturbations in these pathways have heterogeneous effects on gene induction (1, 26, 37). A more comprehensive knowledge of these details would be invaluable in efforts to generate engineered T cells with predictable downstream functions in vivo.

While much is known about how proximal events downstream of the TCR lead to the expression of many T cell activation markers, significantly less is known about the mechanisms leading to the termination of early gene expression responses. Here we examined TCR signaling kinetics together with a panel of surface receptors and intracellular factors in wild-type and Itk−/− OT-I CD8+ T cells using the fluorescent reporter Nr4a3-Tocky (38). The Nr4a3-Tocky reporter line, which produces the Tocky fluorescent reporter protein downstream of the Nr4a3 promoter, was developed to track temporal events following TCR signaling (38). The reporter protein, a variant of mCherry (39), emits blue fluorescence when first translated and has a half-life of ~4.1 hours before undergoing a time dependent spectral conversion to emit red fluorescence. This reporter allows cells with recent TCR signaling (blue fluorescent) to be distinguished from cells with sustained signaling (blue + red fluorescent) and from cells that have terminated/arrested signaling (red fluorescent). Nr4a3 transcription is highly correlated with CD3/CD28-mediated signaling, and is regulated by both the NFAT and Erk-MAPK pathways (38, 4042) making it an excellent temporal metric for TCR signaling. Utilizing this system, along with small molecule inhibitors of the NFAT, NF-kB, and Erk-MAPK pathways, we examined the expression of a panel of proteins following activation of CD8+ T cells. These data demonstrated the multifactorial regulation of most early T cell activation markers, and the importance of TCR signal strength in dictating the kinetics of gene expression responses. Further, we found that ITK signaling is critical for the early dynamics of a potential negative feedback pathway that tunes the expression of many of these genes, and that this negative feedback mechanism is induced within the first 24 hours of T cell stimulation. These findings indicate that ITK regulates the kinetics of TCR-mediated gene expression at both the initiation and the termination phases of the response.

Results

TCR signal strength determines the duration and magnitude of signaling and the expression of T cell activation markers.

To test the effects of TCR signal strength on the overall expression kinetics of CD8+ T cells, we stimulated OT-I Rag1−/− Nr4a3-Tocky splenocytes in vitro with 1nM OVA peptides for 5, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Two peptide ligands at two doses were used: OVA-N4 (high affinity) and OVA-T4 (lower affinity), which vary in their potency at activating OT-I CD8+ T cells (27). Overlaying all time points stimulated with 1nM OVA on a single plot showed increased proportions of Tocky-Blue+ Tocky-Red+ cells in the OVA-N4 stimulated sample compared to OVA-T4, along with elevated Median Fluorescent (MFI) Intensity of Tocky-Blue at 24h and 48h post-stimulation (Fig. 1AC). In both the 1nM OVA-T4 and OVA-N4 stimulated cells, peak expression levels for CD69 were at 12h, whereas Nr4a3-Tocky Blue, CD44, CD25, PD-1, IRF4, and IRF8 peaked at 24h based on the normalized MFI (Fig. 1D). For cMyc and Egr2, the highest levels of expression were at 5h. Comparing cells stimulated with OVA-N4 to those stimulated with OVA-T4 revealed differences in the peak magnitudes of induced expression for most proteins, but in general, little impact on the general pattern of expression over the course of three days (72h) (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1. TCR stimulation with high affinity pMHC promotes prolonged signaling and prolonged expression of multiple T cell activation markers.

Fig. 1.

OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky splenocytes were stimulated with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 at 1nM or 10nM and examined at 5, 12, 24, 48 and 72h post-stimulation. (A) Tocky-Blue versus Tocky-Red fluorescence in cells stimulated with 1nM of each peptide are overlaid for all 5 time points. (B) Representative flow plots of Tocky-Blue versus Tocky-Red expression at 48h. (C) Compilation of data showing percentages of Tocky-Blue-positive cells and Tocky-Blue MFI at 48h. Data are means +/− SD of 6-8 biological replicates and 5 independent experiments. Multiple paired t-test *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. (D, E) Compiled timecourse data for cells stimulated with 1nM OVA-N4 (grey) or OVA-T4 (blue) showing MFIs of expression in cells positive for the indicated marker at each time (D) or percentages of marker positive cells at each timepoint (E). Means +/−SD of normalized MFI (calculated as % experimental max) or percentages of positive cells are shown from 6-8 biological replicates of 5-6 independent experiments.

However, a closer analysis of the Tocky-Blue signal, a surrogate for ongoing TCR stimulation, showed that a greater proportion of CD8+ T cells activated with OVA-N4 continued to express Tocky-Blue at 48h compared to cells stimulated with OVA-T4 peptide (Fig. 1BC). Based on the known half-life of the Tocky-Blue signal, the presence of Tocky-Blue-positive cells at this time indicated that TCR signaling was persisting in those cells for a minimum of 40 hours. OVA-N4 stimulated cells showed a greater percentage of CD8 T cells remain positive for CD69, CD44, CD25, PD-1, and cMyc compared to OVA-T4 stimulated cells at 48h, reinforcing the observation that higher affinity TCR stimulation leads to a modest increase in the duration of expression of several activation markers (Fig. 1E).

TCR signal strength tunes the dynamics of initial activation signals that broadly impact gene expression.

To assess the effect of ligand affinity and abundance on the initial onset of TCR signaling, we examined the OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky CD8+ T cells over the first 5h of activation using Tocky-Blue versus Tocky-Red fluorescence in OVA-T4 and OVA-N4 stimulated cells, along with a panel of additional early activation markers. Both the percentage of positive cells as well as the relative expression levels, shown as MFI, among positive cells were quantified for each protein. Examination of Tocky-Blue and CD69 (an Erk-MAPK-dependent early activation marker (43)) co-expression showed that at a population level the two proteins increased in parallel following stimulation with either peptide (Fig. 2A), despite the slower kinetics of the response to OVA-T4 (Fig. 1A). Transcription factors that are also expressed such as c-Myc, EGR2, and IRF4 also showed faster kinetics of expression as peptide affinity and/or peptide dose increased (Fig. 2B). A similar finding was observed for the expression of the high affinity subunit of the IL-2 receptor, CD25 (Fig. 2C). A compilation of data for a set of surface markers and transcription factors showed the consistent delay in upregulation of these responses after 5 hours of TCR stimulation when OT-I cells were stimulated with the lower affinity OVA-T4 variant compared to OVA-N4 (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2. Stimulation of CD8+ T cells with reduced TCR signal strength delays the upregulation of multiple surface markers and transcription factors.

Fig. 2.

OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky splenocytes were stimulated in vitro with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 at 1nM or 10nM for 5h. (A) Pseudocolor plots of Tocky-Blue versus CD69 are shown with OVA-N4 stimulated cells (Grey) overlaid on OVA-T4-stimulated cells (Blue), with histograms of Tocky-Blue fluorescence below. (B) Histograms of intracellular EGR2, cMyc, and IRF4 expression; MFI of positive cells, gated as shown, on right. (C) Comparative pseudocolor plots showing expression of Tocky-Blue fluorescence on Y-axis with CD69 or CD25 fluorescence on a colored continuous scale as shown. (D) Compilation of data showing normalized MFI (% experimental max at 5h; top) and percentages of positive cells (bottom) for the indicated proteins. Data are from 6-8 biological replicates of 5 independent experiments. Statistics derived from multiple paired t-test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.

Itk−/− CD8+ T cells show prolonged expression of several early activation markers independent of variations in TCR signal strength.

To assess the duration of TCR signaling and the impact of ITK on the persistence of T cell activation, we used Nr4a3-Tocky Blue expression as a measure of ongoing TCR signaling (38). Along with Tocky-Blue, we measured a set of surface and intracellular proteins in Itk+/+ and Itk−/− T cells over 5, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours following stimulation with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 peptide. This allowed us to compare the kinetics of expression of cell surface receptors associated with activation as well as of transcription factors. We first examined Tocky-Blue versus Tocky-Red signals along with CD69 expression levels at each time point and observed prolonged expression of CD69 beginning at 24h of stimulation in Itk−/− compared to wild-type (Itk+/+) cells (Fig. 3A). Examining the expression of CD69 Tocky-Blue/Red single positive (SP), double positive (DP), and double negative events at 48h post-stimulation, we found that Itk−/− CD8+ T cells showed a greater percentage of CD69+ cells compared to Itk+/+ cells with both OVA-T4 and OVA-N4 stimulation (Fig. 3B). Expanding this analysis to other proteins demonstrated that Itk−/− T cells showed prolonged expression of many proteins at 48h and 72h compared to Itk+/+ T cells. Tocky-Blue, CD69, CD44, cMyc, and IRF4 expression all remained elevated in Itk−/− T cells at 48h post-stimulation compared to Itk+/+ cells (Fig. 3C); a similar pattern was observed for IRF8, Eomesodermin (Eomes), CD25, and PD-L1 (Supp. Fig 1). In the case of IRF4, protein levels increase in Itk−/− T cells between 24h and 48h, whereas the opposite was the case for Itk+/+ cells indicating there was prolonged upregulation of IRF4 in cells lacking ITK (Fig. 3C). In addition, for cells stimulated with OVA-N4, Itk−/− T cells often showed a greater percentage of cells retaining expression of induced proteins at 48h compared to Itk+/+ cells (Fig. 3C). Overall, this analysis demonstrated that the absence of ITK from the TCR signaling pathway does not mimic the effects of reducing TCR signal strength seen by lowering peptide affinity or peptide dose in Fig. 1D. Instead, the absence of ITK produces a diminished early response, but leads to prolonged expression of activation markers at later time points (>24h).

Fig. 3. Impaired termination of activation gene expression in the absence of ITK.

Fig. 3.

(A) 0-72h timecourse of Tocky-Blue versus Tocky-Red expression for Itk−/− (top) and Itk+/+ (bottom) OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky cells stimulated with OVA-N4 at 1nM. CD69 expression is represented as colored continuous on each density plot. (B) Compilation of data comparing percentages of CD69-positive cells at 48h on gated Tocky Blue+Red+, Tocky BlueRed+ and Tocky BlueRed populations, with gating scheme shown on representative density plot. Statistical analysis performed with 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. Bars are representative of 3-5 experiments with 3-8 biological replicates showing mean +/−SD; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Compilation of data from 0-72h time courses show normalized MFI (% experimental max for marker; top) and percentages of positive cells (bottom). (D) The ratio of each MFI at 48h/24h is plotted; bars <1 indicate a higher signal at 24h than 48h, and bars >1 indicate a higher signal at 48h compared to 24h. Statistics derived from multiple unpaired t-test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. (E) The ratio of the MFI in Itk−/− cells over Itk+/+ cells is plotted over time for each marker. Points >1 indicate a higher signal in Itk−/− cells versus Itk−/− cells and points <1 indicate a higher signal in Itk+/+ cells compared to Itk−/− cells. Data are mean +/−SD from 3-8 biological replicates across 3-5 experiments. (F) Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cell were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with (1nM) OVA-T4 and (1nM) OVA-N4 for 48h. Histograms of Tocky-Blue fluorescence for cells in each division cycle are shown. (G) Normalized MFI (ratio of MFI to max experimental MFI at 48h) of Nr4a3-Tocky Blue fluorescence for cells in each division cycle at 48h, comparing Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cells stimulated with Ova-T4 (1nM) and Ova-N4 (1nM). Statistics derived from unpaired t test; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 of 3-4 biological replicates from 3 experiments.

To visualize these findings in a more systematic manner, we calculated fold change of MFI as well as percentages of positive cells for each protein at 48h versus 24h (Fig. 3D). In these graphs values of 1 indicate equivalent expression at 48h compared to 24h, whereas values <1 indicate reduced expression at 48h relative to 24h. This analysis indicates that for a set of proteins, including Tocky-Blue, CD69, CD44, cMyc and IRF4, Itk−/− OT-I cells show an increased ratio of expression per cell (48/24h) compared to Itk+/+ cells. In several cases, ratios of the percent positive cells are also higher in Itk−/− cells, most notably Tocky Blue, CD69 and cMyc in response to stimulation with low affinity OVA-T4 peptide (Fig. 3D).

To better understand the relative effect of peptide affinity on this persistence, we calculated the ratios of MFIs for multiple proteins in Itk−/− versus Itk+/+ OT-I cells over the entire 72 hour time-course (Fig. 3E). In these graphs, data points >1 indicate that the expression levels of that protein are higher in Itk−/− compared to Itk+/+ cells at a given time point, and data points <1 indicate higher expression in Itk+/+ compared to Itk−/−. At early time points, Itk+/+ cells express higher levels of several proteins compared to Itk−/− cells, indicated by data points <1. This is particularly evident for cells stimulated with OVA-T4, confirming previous findings (26, 44) that the contribution of ITK to TCR-dependent responses is substantially greater under conditions of weak TCR signaling (44). These graphs also confirm the finding that at later time points (>24h), Itk−/− cells express higher levels of these proteins than Itk+/+ T cells, indicated by data points >1. Furthermore, this phenomenon is not dependent on TCR signal strength as the ratio of activation marker expression in Itk−/− over Itk+/+ cells after stimulation with either high or low affinity antigen is similar for most proteins examined (Fig. 3E).

To rule out the possibility that our observations of prolonged TCR signaling and extended duration of activation marker expression in Itk−/− cells were due to differences in cell proliferation, we assessed Nr4a3-Tocky Blue expression across cell divisions using CFSE dilution. Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells were stimulated for 48h with 1nM OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 and then analyzed for Tocky-Blue signal within each cell division cycle. This analysis confirmed that, compared to Itk+/+ cells, Itk−/− cells express persistent Tocky-Blue with both high and low TCR stimulation at each corresponding cell division cycle (Fig. 3F,G). These data indicate that persistent Nr4a3-Tocky Blue expression in Itk−/− cells is not due to reduced Tocky Blue dilution resulting from lower proliferation of Itk−/− cells (45, 46).

Finally, to validate our findings of prolonged protein expression in CD8+ T cells lacking ITK and link Nr4a3 expression to promoter activity post peptide stimulation, we developed a simple mathematical model based on a one-dimensional ordinary differential equation. This model leverages the known ~4.1 hour half-life for the conversion of Tocky Blue into the red fluorescent form. Based on this approach, the inferred Nr4a3 promoter activity and the corresponding model-predicted dynamics of the Tocky-Blue signal are shown (Supp. Fig 2). With 1nM OVA-N4 stimulation the promoter activity in Itk+/+ cells peaks at 12h post stimulation. The same peptide stimulation in Itk−/− cells also led to a similar timing of peak promoter activity but the peak was reduced by 30% compared to Itk+/+. Notably, the ensuing decrease in promoter activity is much slower in Itk−/− as compared to Itk+/+ (Supp. Fig 2). Stimulation with OVA-T4 exhibits a striking difference in promoter activity between the two different genotypes. In Itk+/+ cells, promoter activity peaks at 4h followed by a decline. In contrast, in Itk−/− cells the promoter activity plateaus after a rapid initial increase, and remains relatively increased until 60h post stimulation, after which it exhibits a sharp decline. This sustained promoter activation in Itk−/− cells explains the rising Tocky-Blue signal even up to 50h post 1nM T4 stimulation and validates the prolonged phenotype we see at the protein expression level.

Inhibition of ITK after 24 hours of stimulation does not alter the kinetics or duration of T cell activation responses.

We next sought to determine the timing of the requirement for ITK in terminating the responses to T-cell stimulation. To assess this, we stimulated Itk+/+ OT-I CD8+ T cells with low affinity OVA-T4 for 24h, washed off the peptide and cultured the cells for an additional 24h in the presence or absence of the small molecule dual inhibitor of ITK/RLK, PRN694 (47). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at 24h, prior to PRN694 addition, and at 48h. As shown, addition of PRN694 at 24h post-stimulation did not lead to prolonged expression of CD69 or CD44 (Fig. 4A). As a control, we compared Itk+/+ OT-I cells cultured for the entire 48h with PRN694 and Itk−/− OT-I cells stimulated for 48h in the absence of PRN694, and verified that the presence of PRN694 during the first 48h of stimulation produced similar prolonged expression observed with Itk−/− OT-I cells when stimulated with OVA-T4 (Fig 4B). These data demonstrated that the effects of ITK on gene expression kinetics resulted from ITK activity in the first 24h post-stimulation, as prolonged expression of multiple T cell activation markers was not observed when the ITK inhibitor was added to cells after the first 24h.

Fig. 4. ITK signaling is required in the first 24h of activation to ensure signal termination at later times.

Fig. 4.

(A) Tocky-Blue versus Tocky-Red fluorescence plots of OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky Itk+/+ cells stimulated for 48h with no PRN694, or with PRN694 (50nM) added at 24h. Colored continuous scale shows fluorescence of CD69 (left) or CD44 (right). (B) Compilation of fold change of normalized MFIs (% max of experiment) from 48h to 24h for CD69, Tocky-Blue, CD25, and CD44 stimulated with OVA-T4 (1nM). Statistics derived from one-way ANOVA with Dunn–Šidák correction, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. Graph derived from 4-6 biological replicates from 4 experiments.

Initial Nr4a3-Tocky expression is delayed and reduced in magnitude in the absence of ITK.

TCR signal strength has been linked to the duration of TCR occupancy by pMHC ligands and is therefore a function of both the individual affinity of a TCR for pMHC as well as the density of pMHC ligands on the antigen-presenting cell (1315, 31). Together, these variables determine whether a T cell crosses the threshold to activation, and if activated, the time for induced transcriptional responses to begin (1, 26, 48, 49). One of the rate-limiting factors is the accumulation of second messengers, IP3 and DAG, generated through cleavage of PIP2 by PLC-γ1. For instance, a certain level of IP3 is needed to activate the calcium response, which leads to calcineurin activation, dephosphorylation of NFAT, and NFAT translocation into the nucleus, which takes place usually within minutes of TCR stimulation (32, 50, 51). Since ITK functions to promote PLC-γ1 activation, we reasoned that the absence of ITK should have a marked effect on the kinetics of upregulation of many T cell activation genes.

To test ITK’s role in the first 24h post stimulation, OT-I Rag1−/− Itk−/− Nr4a3-Tocky T cells were stimulated in parallel with OT-I Rag1−/− Itk+/+ Nr4a3-Tocky T cells for 5h with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 peptide. We first confirmed by bulk RNA-seq that the unstimulated starting populations of Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cells used for these experiments were not notably different in transcriptional profile due to potential effects of altered thymic development in the absence of ITK (Supp. Fig 3). To visualize the regulation of T cell surface receptors along with Tocky-Blue expression across multiple samples, we displayed the fluorescent signal of Tocky-Blue on the Y-axis and the MFI of the surface receptors (CD69 or CD25) in pseudo-color for each sample (Fig. 5A). This analysis showed that for Itk+/+ T cells stimulated with OVA-N4, Tocky-Blue expression was tightly coupled to both CD69 and CD25 upregulation. Stimulation with OVA-T4 produced a more heterogeneous response for both surface receptors as well as Tocky-Blue at 5h. Itk−/− T cells, in contrast, showed less synchronous responses, particularly after stimulation with OVA-T4. This was most apparent by assessment of CD25 upregulation, which was markedly reduced in Tocky-Blue-positive cells at 5h of stimulation (Fig. 5A). When comparing the expression of Tocky-Blue and CD69 in Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cells, we observed the presence of CD69 positive cells that lacked Tocky-Blue expression in Itk−/− cells (Fig 5BC). After gating on CD69+ cells, only 50% of Itk−/− cells stimulated with OVA-T4 were positive for Tocky-Blue in comparison to the 80% of cells that were positive among CD69 expressing Itk+/+ cells, further demonstrating a potential uncoupling of these two responses in the absence of ITK (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5. Signaling through ITK has varying contributions to the initial upregulation of distinct activation markers.

Fig. 5.

(A) Itk+/+ versus Itk−/− OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky cells were stimulated with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 at 1nM for 5h. Comparative pseudocolor plots showing expression of Tocky-Blue fluorescence on Y-axis with CD69 or CD25 fluorescence on a colored continuous scale. (B) Pseudocolor plots of Tocky-Blue versus CD69 are shown with Itk+/+ cells (Blue) overlaid on Itk−/− cells (Red) with histograms of Tocky-Blue fluorescence below. (C) Compilation of percentages of Tocky-Blue-positive cells of the CD69+ cells from 5 biological replicates and 4 experiments. Statistics derived from unpaired t-test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. (D) Compilation of data from 6-8 biological replicates of 6 experiments showing normalized MFI (as % experimental max MFI at 5h) (top) and percentages of positive cells (bottom) for a set of activation markers. Statistics derived from multiple unpaired t-test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.

Compiled data for a set of cell surface receptors and transcription factors shows the widespread effects of ITK deficiency on the early upregulation of TCR response genes (Fig. 5D). Transcriptional analysis of Itk+/+ versus Itk−/− cells stimulated with OVA-T4 for 5, 12, and 24h confirmed that the protein expression data correlated with mRNA levels for these TCR-induced genes (Fig. 3C, Supp. Fig 4). For most of these proteins, the percentages of cells with detectable upregulation and the expression levels per cell (i.e., MFIs) were reduced in the absence of ITK, an effect more clearly seen when cells were stimulated with the weaker peptide ligand OVA-T4 versus OVA-N4. At 5h post-stimulation, the expression levels per cell were far below the maximum expression achieved at later time points (Fig. 1D), indicating that the differences observed at this early time are primarily due to a delay in the onset of TCR-dependent transcriptional responses in the absence of ITK (Fig. 5D). Noting this differential expression early after TCR stimulation, we hypothesized that there were distinct subpopulations of cells that arose due to disparate thresholds of transcription factor activation being achieved by Itk+/+ compared to Itk−/− T cells. To assess this, we performed dimensionality reduction by pooling flow cytometry data from Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cells stimulated with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 for 5h. Using the measurements of seven intracellular proteins and 3 extracellular proteins (Supp. Fig 5), we observed that Itk−/− T cells stimulated with 1nM T4 were highly enriched in cluster 1 over the other cell subsets. This cluster was characterized as CD69+, but low to negative for other induced proteins like IRF4, cMyc, IRF8, CD25, Egr2 and CD44, and likely represents cells that have achieved the threshold for upregulation of CD69, but not of the other proteins. Given the dependence of CD69 expression on Erk-MAPK signaling (43), these data highlight the marginal contribution of ITK to the rate of activation of the Erk-MAPK pathway compared to other transcriptional responses when CD8+ T cells are stimulated with low TCR signal strength (e.g., OVA-T4). These findings are consistent with our previous observations that ITK signaling is dispensable for early Erk-MAPK activation, but required for the normal rapid kinetics of NFAT activation (1). Here we expand our earlier findings to a larger panel of cell surface and intracellular markers, and show that ITK signaling impacts the early upregulation of many proteins, including Nr4a3-driven Tocky-Blue, CD25, CD44, cMyc, and Egr2, particularly under conditions of weaker TCR stimulation (Fig. 5D).

Inhibition of NFκB activation mimics the prolonged duration of TCR-dependent responses seen in the absence of ITK.

Based on our findings that ITK was required during the first 24h of T cell stimulation to prevent the prolonged expression of multiple T cell activation markers, we considered that ITK might function to promote the upregulation of a gene (or genes) involved in the termination of TCR-dependent transcriptional responses. In our previous studies, we found that ITK had the most dramatic effect on NF-κB activation, as ITK is required for the optimal kinetics and magnitude of NF-κB(p65) nuclear translocation after TCR stimulation (1). In comparison, ITK signaling was necessary for the normal rapid kinetics of NFAT translocation into the nucleus but not for the magnitude of NFAT activation, and had little effect on the kinetics of Erk-MAPK phosphorylation (1). To address the possibility that one or more of these transcriptional pathways might contribute to the altered kinetics of gene expression observed in Itk−/− T cells, we performed the same time course experiments in the presence or absence of three different inhibitors: an inhibitor of NFAT activation, Cyclosporin A (CsA); an inhibitor of NFκB activation, IKK16; or an inhibitor of Erk-MAPK phosphorylation, PD325901 (a MEK inhibitor). The outcome seen for each of these inhibitors was compared to the effects of germline KO of ITK with particular attention being paid to the later time points where Itk+/+ cells show termination of signaling and loss of activation marker expression compared to Itk−/− T cells. These experiments showed that Itk+/+ T cells treated with IKK16 experienced the prolonged TCR signaling that is seen in T cells lacking ITK, evident by the continued co-expression of Tocky-Blue and CD69 at 48h with OVA-N4 stimulation compared to Itk+/+(Fig. 6A). We also observed a similar prolonged expression of several other proteins when comparing IKK16-treated T cells to Itk−/− T cells, including CD44, CD69, Tocky Blue, Egr2, cMyc and IRF4 (Fig. 6BD). At 5h post stimulation IKK16 inhibited CD8+ T cells showed a robust decrease from Itk+/+ and Itk−/− in expression of most early activation markers with both high and low affinity pMHC stimulation (Fig. 6E). At 5h IKK16 inhibited and Itk−/− CD8 T cells showed similar levels of expression for many markers including Tocky Blue, CD25, IRF4, cMyc and Egr2 with both OVA-T4 and OVA-N4 stimulation (Fig. 6E). These data strongly suggest that ITK signaling is required for the upregulation of an NF-κB-dependent response gene that terminates/tunes TCR induced gene expression in Itk+/+ CD8+ T cells. We also observed a higher peak magnitude of expression of the NFAT-dependent Nr4a3-Tocky Blue protein in the IKK-16 treated Itk+/+ cells compared to untreated at 24h (Fig. 6B). This finding further supports the existence of an NF-κB-dependent mechanism that tunes the NFAT response in the timeframe of 12-24h post-stimulation.

Fig. 6. Inhibition of NF-κB activation leads to prolonged expression of Nr4a3-Tocky-Blue.

Fig. 6.

(A) Tocky-Blue versus CD69 fluorescence at 48h in OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky Itk+/+ cells, Itk−/− cells, and Itk+/+ cells stimulated with 1nM of OVA-N4. Itk+/+ cells were stimulated in the presence or absence of inhibitors of NF-κB activation (IKK-16 (B) Compiled data showing expression (MFI and/or % positive, as indicated) of Tocky-Blue, CD69, PD-1, IRF4, cMyc, and Egr2 for time courses of 0-72h for cells cultured in the presence or absence of IKK16; all cells were stimulated with 1nM OVA-N4. (C) Statistics derived for percentages of marker positive CD8+ T cells at 48h post Ova addition comparing Itk+/+, Itk−/−, and Itk+/+ cells treated with IKK16. Statistics derived from two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 using 3 biological replicates from 2 experiments. (D) Statistics of normalized MFI (% of 48h max) in CD8+ T cells at 48h post Ova addition comparing Itk+/+, Itk−/−, and Itk+/+ inhibited with IKK16. Statistics derived from two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 using 3 biological replicates from 2 experiments. (E) Graphs show compilations of normalized MFI (% experimental max of marker at 5h (Right) and percentages of positive cells (Left) for Itk−/− cells and Itk+/+ treated with IkK inhibitor (IKK16) for 5h with OVA-T4 (Top) or OVA-N4 (Bottom). Data are mean +/−SD of 3 biological replicates over 2 experiments. Statistics derived from two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 using 3 biological replicates from 2 experiments. (F) Mathematical modeling of IRF4 expression over time (hrs) showing expression and promoter activity when stimulated with high affinity OVA-N4.

Inhibition of NFAT leads to increased rate of expression of MAPK-ErK dependent markers

In contrast to the effects of IKK-16, inhibition of NFAT activation with CsA or of Erk-MAPK phosphorylation with PD325901 had varying effects on the kinetics and/or the peak expression levels of multiple activation markers; however, neither of these inhibitors led to prolonged TCR signaling or sustained expression of several proteins (Fig. 7A). Instead, NFAT inhibition with CsA often mimicked the reduced upregulation of proteins such as CD69, CD44, CD25, IRF4, and cMyc at 5h post-stimulation as seen in the Itk−/− (Fig. 7B). To examine early kinetics, we used expression levels of Nr4a3-Tocky Blue as pseudo-time since initial TCR signaling, gating on increasing levels of the Nr4a3-Tocky Blue reporter. This analysis showed that Erk-MAPK-dependent CD44, CD25, and CD69 upregulation all increased at a faster rate in Itk+/+ cells treated with Cyclosporin A compared to untreated cells (Fig. 7C). ITK inhibition has been shown to delay translocation of NFAT into the nucleus through regulation of signaling thresholds proximal to TCR signaling (1) which could explain the overall increase in CD44 at 5Hrs between Itk−/− and Itk+/+ at 5h when stimulated with low affinity OVA-T4 (Fig. 5D). Moreover, this finding suggests that in the absence of NFAT activation, genes that are predominantly dependent on the Erk-MAPK pathway are more rapidly induced compared to cells where both NFAT and the MAPK-Erk pathway are rapidly induced showing another avenue at which temporally dysregulated processes can lead to differential gene regulation (Fig. 7D).

Fig. 7. Inhibition of NFAT activation leads to increased expression of MAPK-ErK dependent activation markers.

Fig. 7.

(A) Compiled data show expression (MFI and/or % positive, as indicated) of Tocky-Blue, CD44, CD69, PDL1, PD-1, Egr2 and IRF4 for time courses of 0-72h. Itk−/− cells and Itk+/+ cells cultured in the presence or absence of CsA or PD325901 are shown; all cells were stimulated with 1nM OVA-N4. Data are mean +/−SD; representative of 3 biological replicates over 2 experiments. (B) Graphs show compilations of normalized MFI (% experimental max of marker at 5h (Right) and percentages of positive cells (Left) for Itk−/− cells and Itk+/+ treated with calcineurin inhibitor (CsA) or MEK Inhibitor (PD325901) for 5h with OVA-T4 (Top) or OVA-N4 (Bottom). Data are mean +/−SD of 3 biological replicates over 2 experiments. (C) Pseudo-time kinetics shown by normalized MFI (ratio of marker MFI to experimental max at 5h) of CD44 and CD25, and % cells positive for CD69, after gating on different levels of Tocky Blue. Representative gating scheme for different levels of Tocky Blue are shown with the density plot at left. Data are compiled from 3 biological replicates from 2 experiments. (D) Model illustrates the proposed differential contribution of transcription factors NFAT, NFκB, and AP-1 to genes encoding IRF4, CD69, and Nr4a3, and the impact of ITK signaling on these pathways, including the induced expression of a putative negative regulator of TCR induced gene expression. Made with Biorender.

Discussion

Our findings provide new insights into the function of the Tec family kinase, ITK, in regulating TCR-dependent gene expression. Using a dynamic fluorescent reporter to capture information about TCR signaling kinetics along with the assessment of multiple cell surface receptors and transcription factors, we show that ITK signaling contributes to both early and late T cell activation responses. At early time points after TCR stimulation, ITK is required for the rapid upregulation and peak expression levels of many TCR-induced proteins. In addition, our data suggest that in the first 24 hoursof activation, ITK induces a regulatory pathway that is needed at later times to terminate the expression of many trans regulatory pathway dependent markers such as CD69, CD44, and IRF4.

These findings indicate that the characterization of ITK as a kinase that regulates ‘TCR signal strength’ is an oversimplification of ITK’s role in T cell activation. At early timepoints post stimulation, CD8+ T cells lacking ITK often show delayed and impaired responses that resemble those of Itk+/+ cells responding to low affinity TCR:pMHC interactions. We observed this in our earlier studies using bulk RNA-seq to compare gene expression in Itk+/+ OT-I cells stimulated in vitro with OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 in the presence or absence of the dual ITK/RLK inhibitor PRN694 (1). Examining very early transcriptional responses at 0.5, 1, and 2h post-stimulation we saw multiple examples of genes (e.g., fos, il2, il2ra, irf4, ifng, nfkbid, nfkbiz) that fit this pattern. However, this pattern of response did not apply to the majority of proteins examined in our study (Fig. 3B, Supplemental Fig 1). Our prior studies demonstrated a differential role for ITK in the activation of NFAT, NFκB (p65), and Erk-MAPK pathways (1). Based on our inhibitor data shown here, we found that each gene examined showed differential dependence on the three major PLCγ1-dependent pathways (Fig. 6B-E, 7A-C), explaining the varying impact of ITK signaling on the panel of proteins we analyzed. Given the ongoing efforts to develop therapeutic ITK inhibitors for autoimmune diseases and immunotherapies, our results indicate an ongoing need to dissect the detailed consequences of blocking ITK signaling.

The duration of TCR signaling is regulated through many different mechanisms. These include ubiquitination and degradation of key signaling proteins (5254), the recruitment of protein tyrosine and lipid phosphatases (55, 56) to the immune synapse, and enzymes that inactivate the PLCγ1-dependent second messengers IP3 and DAG (16, 57, 58). More complex mechanisms, such as negative feedback loops that are mediated by post-translational modifications of signaling intermediates have also been described (59). In addition to these relatively rapid proximal signaling events, other inhibitory factors including Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) family proteins are absent in naïve cells and rapidly increase in expression upon TCR activation (60). Less well-studied are the negative regulators of TCR signaling that are transcriptionally induced following T cell stimulation. While the specific details of the ITK-dependent regulatory mechanism identified here remain to be elucidated, our results strongly suggest that an NFκB-regulated gene is contributing to the prolonged signaling phenotype. ITK has been shown to play a substantial role in NFκB activation compared to Erk-MAPK-dependent and NFAT-family transcription factors (1). This is likely due to ITK’s importance in activating PLC-γ1 and the known roles for pathways downstream of both DAG and IP3 on the nuclear translocation of NFκB. We hypothesize that the absence of ITK leads to reduced NFκB activation and thus to the impaired expression of one or more negative regulators of TCR signaling. This hypothesis is supported by the elevated expression of NFAT-dependent Nr4a3-Tocky Blue at 24h and prolonged expression of CD44, CD69, cMyc and Egr2 at 48hs in cells treated with IKK-16, effects not observed in cells treated with Cyclosporin A or PD325901.

Our detailed studies of the kinetics of T cell activation-dependent gene expression responses reveal the importance of clearly defining ‘T cell activation’ in experimental settings. For instance, CD69 has historically been used as an activation marker due to its rapid expression after T cell stimulation. In our time-course experiments, we showed that both CD69 and Nr4a3-Tocky-Blue were coordinately co-expressed in both Itk+/+ and Itk−/− CD8+ T cells following strong TCR stimulation. However, lower affinity stimulation uncoupled these two responses, with a significant proportion of Itk−/− OT-I cells upregulating CD69 without expressing Tocky-Blue at 5h. As Cd69 is known to be an Erk-MAPK-dependent gene, this finding is consistent with observations showing that the Erk-MAPK pathway has a lower threshold for activation than that needed for NFAT activation and is relatively unaffected by the absence of ITK activity (1, 3, 5, 61). Unsupervised clustering analysis performed using activation marker expression further corroborated these findings, as the unique clusters 1, 3, and 4 were dominated by OVA-T4 stimulated Itk−/− cells and was enriched for several Erk-MAPK target genes, such as Egr2, CD69, cMyc and IRF8 (Supp. Fig 5) (60, 62, 63). Overall, these findings strongly suggest that T cells stimulated in the absence of ITK have a prolonged lag time between the initiation of the Erk-MAPK pathway and the activation of NFAT (Fig. 7A-D) A recent study used dual-reporter-positive T cells for simultaneous assessment of NFAT and Erk-MAPK nuclear translocation. The authors showed that over long timeframes (~30h), these two transcription factors oscillate between the nucleus and the cytoplasm in a peptide affinity- and dose-dependent manner (37) given continuous pMHC-TCR interaction, providing a mechanism to generate divergent transcriptional programs in cells stimulated under different conditions. Furthermore, they showed through mathematical modeling and plate bound pMHC stimulation that when AP-1 and NFAT have DNA binding availability at the same time they act in a way that keeps them from binding alone or to other binding partners. Based on our data, we anticipate that the absence or inhibition of ITK would alter this oscillatory behavior and significantly impact the T cell programming observed in this study, particularly if the sequence at which AP-1 and NFAT translocation into the nucleus is delayed through ITK inhibition or low pMHC binding affinity. One observation of interest was our finding that inhibiting NFAT activation through Cyclosporin A treatment led to faster and increased expression of CD44, CD25, and CD69 compared to control cells (Fig. 7 F-H). Based on the robust inhibition of CD69, CD44, and CD25 expression by the MEK inhibitor PD325901, it is apparent that these proteins are highly dependent on Erk-MAPK and likely AP-1 activities. One possibility is that inhibition of NFAT nuclear translocation results in elevated AP-1 activity due to the absence of the NFAT/AP-1 complexes competing for nuclear AP-1. As a result, genes that are regulated by AP-1, but not NFAT/AP-1, would be more readily occupied by higher levels of AP-1. Together, these findings demonstrate the important insights to be gained by detailed molecular and biochemical analyses of early responses to TCR signaling. Unraveling these pathways reveals the complex interplay between transcriptional regulators acting to induce downstream effector genes, their abilities to act solo or in tandem with others, and their essential roles in regulating signal termination.

Experimental Methods

Mice

Mice were housed and bred at the University of Colorado-Anschutz campus in accordance with IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use of Committee guidelines.) Previously described Itk−/− (64) mice were bred to C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J - Rag1tm1Mom/J (Jackson Laboratory) to generate OT-I Rag1−/− Itk−/−. Wild-type or Itk−/− OT-I Rag1−/− mice were then crossed to the Nr4a3-Tocky Timer line (38). The Nr4a3-Tocky reporter was bred to homozygosity, and mice were genotyped using a SYBR green protocol (42).

OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky CD8+ T cell Stimulation

Spleens were harvested and pooled from 6-12 week old OT-I Rag1−/− Nr4a3-Tocky and OT-I Rag1−/− Nr4a3-Tocky Itk−/− mice. In some experiments, splenocytes were stained with 0.14ng/uL CFSE (Life Technologies) for 20 minutes in dPBS then washed twice with flow buffer (dPBS + 2% FBS) prior to stimulation. 2 x 106 splenocytes per well were stimulated with SIITFEKL or SIINFEKL peptides (21st Century Biochemicals) in the presence of 2μg/mL LPS (Sigma Aldrich) and incubated at 37C. Cells were harvested for spectral flow cytometry analysis at 5, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-peptide addition. For longer timepoints (48, 72h), peptide and LPS were washed off at 24h and splenocytes transferred into new plates and given fresh media supplemented with 10 IU mIL-2 (Peprotech). Media supplemented with 10 IU mIL-2 was replaced again at 48 hours. In some experiments the small molecule inhibitor of ITK/RLK, PRN694 (Sigma), was added at 50nM at time 0 or at 24h post Ova + LPS addition following washing. In other experiments, Cyclosporin A (Sigma) at 200ng/mL, IKK-16 (Sigma) at 500nM, or PD325901 MEK inhibitor (Tocris Bioscience) at 1μM were added to splenocytes 20 minutes before the Ova peptide + LPS addition.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

Bulk splenoyctes were harvested and stained with a mixture of Anti-mouse CD16/CD32 Fc Shield (Clone 2.4G2) at 0.5ug/mL and Ghost Dye Red 780 Viability Dye (diluted 1:15000) for 15 minutes at 4C before washing with PBS containing 2% FBS (Cytiva). Surface marker master mix was made with Brilliant Stain Buffer (Cytiva) diluted 1:2 in dPBS (Gibco) and cells were stained in 100uL for 20 minutes at 4C. For intracellular panels, cells were further washed then fixed and permeabilized prior to antibody staining. Antibodies used were as follows: CD8-BUV395 (Clone 53-6.7), CD69-BUV805 (Clone: H1.2F3), CD44-AF700 (Clone: IM7), PD-1-FITC (Clone: 29F.1A12), CD25-PE (Clone: PC61.5), , CD122-PE-Cy7 (Clone: TM-B1), CD274 (PDL1)-BUV737 (Clone:MIH5), CD127 (Clone: A7R34), CD62L-Percp-Cy5.5 (Clone: MEL-14), IRF4-AF594 (Clone: IRF4.3E4), c-Myc-AF647 (Clone: E5Q6W), Egr2 (Clone: erongr2), Eomes-BUV737 (X4-83), IRF8 (Clone: V3GYWCH), TCF1/7-BV421 (Clone :S33-966), IkB-AF488 (Clone:L35A5).

Bulk mRNA-Sequencing Sample Preparation

Cells from each genotype (OT-I Rag1−/− Itk+/+ Nr4a3-Tocky+/+ and OT-I Rag1−/− Itk−/− Nr4a3-Tocky+/+) were separately pooled from spleen and lymph nodes (inguinal, axillary) and red blood cells were lysed with ACK lysis buffer. For unstimulated samples, naive T cells were enriched with the StemCell EasySep Mouse CD8+ T cell Isolation Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions and sorted for live, CD44lo CD8+ naïve cells.. For all other time points (5, 12, and 24 hours), isolated cells were split into two groups. With one group, naïve CD8+ T cells were isolated with the Stemcell EasySep Mouse Naïve CD8+ T cell Isolation Kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions. From the rest of the cells, T cells were depleted using the Stemcell EasySep Mouse CD90.2 Positive Selection Kit II, according to manufacturer’s instructions. Naïve T cells were plated with T-depleted cells (treated as APCs) in T cell media at a ratio of 5:1 in a 24-well plate with either 1nM OVA-N4 or OVA-T4 peptide. After 5, 12, and 24 hours of culture, cells were harvested and stained with Zombie Green and CD8-PE (clone 53-6.7). Cells were sorted on a Bio-Rad S3e Cell Sorter, gated on single cells, live, CD8+ T cells. Sort efficiency was verified via flow cytometry. Sorted CD8+ T cells were washed once in cold PBS before being resuspended in 350ul of buffer RLT +3.5ul BME and stored at −80 until RNA isolation. After all samples had been acquired, frozen CD8+ T cell lysates were thawed and total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. On-column DNA digestion was performed using the Qiagen RNAse-free DNase set, and RNA cleanup was performed before RNA quantification on a NanoDrop. RNA was frozen at −80 and sent to National Jewish Health Genomics Core for library preparation and sequencing.

Watchmaker mRNA Library Prep and Sequencing

RNA sequencing libraries were prepared according to the Watchmaker mRNA Library Build user guide. Briefly, mRNA from 5ng of total RNA was isolated using polyA, oligo-dT magnetic beads. The isolated mRNA was then subject to enzymatic fragmentation, resulting in ~200 bp fragments. The resulting RNA fragments underwent first and second strand cDNA synthesis. Unique KAPA Dual-Indexes were then ligated to the cDNA. The ligated product was then PCR amplified for 16 cycles. The resulting libraries were quantified using the Qubit HSDNA assay and the TapeStation HSDNA 1000 assay. Equal molar concentrations were pooled, diluted, and sequenced using a 200 cycle Illumina NextSeq 2000 flow cell.

Processing and Analysis of Bulk mRNA-Sequencing Reads

Adapter sequences were trimmed from quality raw sequences reads with cutadapt version 4.2 (65) and then aligned to mm39 mouse reference genome with STAR version 2.7.10b (66). Samples were filtered to retain expressed genes (at least 20 reads present in at least half of the samples). Differential expression analysis was performed with DESeq2 version 1.45.3 (67) to identify induced genes (stimulated conditions versus unstimulated controls). Processing of the sequencing reads was done using the Alpine high performance computing resource at the University of Colorado Boulder Alpine Research Computing (68). Analysis performed within R version 4.4.1, data visualized using ggplot2 (69).

Dimensionality Reduction

Unsupervised clustering was done in Flowjo (version 10.10). Gates were set for Live CD8+ T cells and downsample (version 3.3.1) was ran to 3000 cells per sample. Samples were concatenated and tSNE was ran through the flowjo native platform for activation markers. Xshift (version 1.4.1) (70) was used for automated clustering for all activation markers and clusters were visualized within Flowjo native platform cluster explorer.

Mathematical Modeling

To model the dynamics of the Tocky-Blue signal post peptide stimulation we use the following ordinary differential equation model

dx(t)dt=g(t)-γx(t)

Here x(t) is the signal at time t post stimulation, and given the reported ~4.1h half-life of the Tocky-Blue protein (38), the degradation rate is set as γ=0.697hr-1. The function g(t) represent the Nr4a3 promoter activity that is assumed to take the form

g(t)=k1×tT1h11+tT2h2

with positive constant parameters k1,T1,h1,T2,h2. The specific values of these constants determine the shape of g(t). If the exponent h1 is smaller than h2, then this function captures promoter activity that starts at zero and first increases with time t to reach a maximum, and then decreases back to zero with increasing t. For each peptide ligand and cell genotype, the five parameters defining g(t) were inferred by performing a least-square error optimization between the experimentally observed average normalized MFI for Tocky Blue at 5h, 12h, 24h, 48h and 72h post-stimulation, and the corresponding model predictions at these time points.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Supplemental Fig. 1. Time course of expression of T cell activation markers in Itk+/+ versus Itk−/− T cells reveals distinct patterns of ITK-dependence.

Compilation of data from 0-72h timecourses show normalized MFI for each protein in cells expressing that protein. Data are mean +/−SD of normalized MFI (% experimental max) from 3-8 biological replicates in 3-5 experiments.

Supplemental Fig. 2 Mathematical modeling of protein expression estimates prolonged promoter activation of Nr4a3-Tocky Blue in Itk−/− CD8+ T cells.

Mathematical modeling showing estimated expression and promoter activation of Nr4a3 in Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cells when stimulated with low affinity OVA-T4 and high affinity Ova-N4 over the time course of 0-72h.

Supplemental Fig. 3. Principle component analysis verifies that Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells are transcriptionally similar upon isolation.

Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells were stimulated for 5, 12, and 24h with 10nM OVA-T4 then sorted for CD8+ T cells prior to bulk RNA-seq analysis. Unstimulated cells were analyzed in parallel as a control. Principle component analysis on 2-3 independent samples was performed.

Supplemental Fig. 4. Bulk RNA-seq analysis shows reduced transcription of T cell activation-induced genes in the absence of ITK.

Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells used for all studies were stimulated for 0, 5, 12, and 24h with OVA-T4 at 10nM, and then sorted for CD8+ T cells prior to bulk RNA-seq analysis. Graphs show transcript numbers (per million) for the indicated genes.

Supplemental Fig. 5. Unsupervised cluster analysis of intracellular markers shows delayed upregulation of genes in Itk−/− T cells.

Unsupervised clustering was performed on pooled cells from Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky T cells stimulated with 1nM OVA-N4 or 1nM OVA-T4 for 5h. Samples were downsampled to 3000 CD8+ T cells per condition prior to concatenation. TSNE pseudocolor plot shows distribution of clusters (left) and bar graph (right) show the percentages of cells in each cluster. Histograms (middle row) show normalized cell numbers present in each cluster. Heat map (bottom) shows relative expression of each protein within each cluster.

media-1.docx (5.6MB, docx)

Acknowledgements:

We thank the Barbara Davis Center BioResource/Molecular Core Center at the University of Colorado-Anschutz for flow cytometry support, and the office of Laboratory Animal Resources excellent mouse work. We also thank Loni Perrenoud for expert assistance in flow cytometry data analysis.

Funding:

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (AI120423 and R01AI043957), and the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (2021035). AS acknowledges the support of NIH-NIGMS via grant R35GM148351.

Footnotes

Competing Interests, Data and Material Availability: the authors declare no competing interests relating to this work. All data generated and material used are available upon request.

References

  • 1.Gallagher MP, Conley JM, Vangala P, Garber M, Reboldi A, Berg LJ. Hierarchy of signaling thresholds downstream of the T cell receptor and the Tec kinase ITK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(35). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Solouki S, Huang W, Elmore J, Limper C, Huang F, August A. TCR Signal Strength and Antigen Affinity Regulate CD8(+) Memory T Cells. J Immunol. 2020;205(5):1217–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Altan-Bonnet G, Germain RN. Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(11):e356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kingeter LM, Paul S, Maynard SK, Cartwright NG, Schaefer BC. Cutting edge: TCR ligation triggers digital activation of NF-kappaB. J Immunol. 2010;185(8):4520–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das J, Ho M, Zikherman J, Govern C, Yang M, Weiss A, et al. Digital signaling and hysteresis characterize ras activation in lymphoid cells. Cell. 2009;136(2):337–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Andreotti AH, Schwartzberg PL, Joseph RE, Berg LJ. T-cell signaling regulated by the Tec family kinase, Itk. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(7):a002287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berg LJ, Finkelstein LD, Lucas JA, Schwartzberg PL. Tec family kinases in T lymphocyte development and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:549–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang W, Sloan-Lancaster J, Kitchen J, Trible RP, Samelson LE. LAT: the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell. 1998;92(1):83–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bubeck Wardenburg J, Fu C, Jackman JK, Flotow H, Wilkinson SE, Williams DH, et al. Phosphorylation of SLP-76 by the ZAP-70 protein-tyrosine kinase is required for T-cell receptor function. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(33):19641–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beach D, Gonen R, Bogin Y, Reischl IG, Yablonski D. Dual role of SLP-76 in mediating T cell receptor-induced activation of phospholipase C-gamma1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(5):2937–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Devkota S, Joseph RE, Min L, Bruce Fulton D, Andreotti AH. Scaffold Protein SLP-76 Primes PLCgamma1 for Activation by ITK-Mediated Phosphorylation. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(17):2734–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Trebak M, Kinet JP. Calcium signalling in T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(3):154–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stone JD, Chervin AS, Kranz DM. T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity. Immunology. 2009;126(2):165–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosette C, Werlen G, Daniels MA, Holman PO, Alam SM, Travers PJ, et al. The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. Immunity. 2001;15(1):59–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chakraborty AK, Weiss A. Insights into the initiation of TCR signaling. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(9):798–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hashimoto-Tane A, Saito T. Dynamic Regulation of TCR-Microclusters and the Microsynapse for T Cell Activation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Viola A, Lanzavecchia A. T cell activation determined by T cell receptor number and tunable thresholds. Science. 1996;273(5271):104–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma CY, Marioni JC, Griffiths GM, Richard AC. Stimulation strength controls the rate of initiation but not the molecular organisation of TCR-induced signalling. Elife. 2020;9. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen L, Flies DB. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(4):227–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Au-Yeung BB, Smith GA, Mueller JL, Heyn CS, Jaszczak RG, Weiss A, et al. IL-2 Modulates the TCR Signaling Threshold for CD8 but Not CD4 T Cell Proliferation on a Single-Cell Level. J Immunol. 2017;198(6):2445–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Curtsinger JM, Schmidt CS, Mondino A, Lins DC, Kedl RM, Jenkins MK, et al. Inflammatory cytokines provide a third signal for activation of naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 1999;162(6):3256–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Humblin E, Korpas I, Lu J, Filipescu D, van der Heide V, Goldstein S, et al. Sustained CD28 costimulation is required for self-renewal and differentiation of TCF-1(+) PD-1(+) CD8 T cells. Sci Immunol. 2023;8(86):eadg0878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lo WL, Shah NH, Rubin SA, Zhang W, Horkova V, Fallahee IR, et al. Slow phosphorylation of a tyrosine residue in LAT optimizes T cell ligand discrimination. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(11):1481–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Richard AC, Frazer GL, Ma CY, Griffiths GM. Staggered starts in the race to T cell activation. Trends Immunol. 2021;42(11):994–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gallagher MP, Conley JM, Berg LJ. Peptide Antigen Concentration Modulates Digital NFAT1 Activation in Primary Mouse Naive CD8(+) T Cells as Measured by Flow Cytometry of Isolated Cell Nuclei. Immunohorizons. 2018;2(7):208–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Conley JM, Gallagher MP, Berg LJ. T Cells and Gene Regulation: The Switching On and Turning Up of Genes after T Cell Receptor Stimulation in CD8 T Cells. Front Immunol. 2016;7:76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zehn D, Lee SY, Bevan MJ. Complete but curtailed T-cell response to very low-affinity antigen. Nature. 2009;458(7235):211–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu LZ, Balyan R, Brzostek J, Zhao X, Gascoigne NRJ. Time required for commitment to T cell proliferation depends on TCR affinity and cytokine response. EMBO Rep. 2023;24(1):e54969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Podtschaske M, Benary U, Zwinger S, Hofer T, Radbruch A, Baumgrass R. Digital NFATc2 activation per cell transforms graded T cell receptor activation into an all-or-none IL-2 expression. PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Balyan R, Gund R, Ebenezer C, Khalsa JK, Verghese DA, Krishnamurthy T, et al. Modulation of Naive CD8 T Cell Response Features by Ligand Density, Affinity, and Continued Signaling via Internalized TCRs. J Immunol. 2017;198(5):1823–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Richard AC, Lun ATL, Lau WWY, Gottgens B, Marioni JC, Griffiths GM. T cell cytolytic capacity is independent of initial stimulation strength. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(8):849–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tomida T, Hirose K, Takizawa A, Shibasaki F, Iino M. NFAT functions as a working memory of Ca2+ signals in decoding Ca2+ oscillation. EMBO J. 2003;22(15):3825–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smith SM, Cai L. Cell specific CD44 expression in breast cancer requires the interaction of AP-1 and NFkappaB with a novel cis-element. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pritzl CJ, Daniels MA, Teixeiro E. Interplay of Inflammatory, Antigen and Tissue-Derived Signals in the Development of Resident CD8 Memory T Cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12:636240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grenningloh R, Tai TS, Frahm N, Hongo TC, Chicoine AT, Brander C, et al. Ets-1 maintains IL-7 receptor expression in peripheral T cells. J Immunol. 2011;186(2):969–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Albao DS, Pipkin ME. Distinct domains in the transcription factor Runx3 mediate differential antiviral CD8 T cell phenotypes. Journal of Immunology. 2023;210(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wither MJ, White WL, Pendyala S, Leanza PJ, Fowler DM, Kueh HY. Antigen perception in T cells by long-term Erk and NFAT signaling dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(52):e2308366120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bending D, Prieto Martin P, Paduraru A, Ducker C, Marzaganov E, Laviron M, et al. A timer for analyzing temporally dynamic changes in transcription during differentiation in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(8):2931–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Subach FV, Subach OM, Gundorov IS, Morozova KS, Piatkevich KD, Cuervo AM, et al. Monomeric fluorescent timers that change color from blue to red report on cellular trafficking. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5(2):118–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jennings E, Elliot TAE, Thawait N, Kanabar S, Yam-Puc JC, Ono M, et al. Nr4a1 and Nr4a3 Reporter Mice Are Differentially Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Signal Strength and Duration. Cell Reports. 2020;33(5):108328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bending D, Zikherman J. Nr4a nuclear receptors: markers and modulators of antigen receptor signaling. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2023/April/01;81. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jennings EK, Lecky DAJ, Ono M, Bending D. Application of dual Nr4a1-GFP Nr4a3-Tocky reporter mice to study T cell receptor signaling by flow cytometry. STAR Protoc. 2021;2(1):100284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Castellanos MC, Munoz C, Montoya MC, Lara-Pezzi E, Lopez-Cabrera M, de Landazuri MO. Expression of the leukocyte early activation antigen CD69 is regulated by the transcription factor AP-1. J Immunol. 1997;159(11):5463–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Conley JM, Gallagher MP, Rao A, Berg LJ. Activation of the Tec Kinase ITK Controls Graded IRF4 Expression in Response to Variations in TCR Signal Strength. J Immunol. 2020;205(2):335–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mammadli M, Huang W, Harris R, Sultana A, Cheng Y, Tong W, et al. Targeting Interleukin-2-Inducible T-Cell Kinase (ITK) Differentiates GVL and GVHD in Allo-HSCT. Front Immunol. 2020;11:593863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhong Y, Johnson AJ, Byrd JC, Dubovsky JA. Targeting Interleukin-2-Inducible T-cell Kinase (ITK) in T-Cell Related Diseases. Postdoc J. 2014;2(6):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cho HS, Shin HM, Haberstock-Debic H, Xing Y, Owens TD, Funk JO, et al. A Small Molecule Inhibitor of ITK and RLK Impairs Th1 Differentiation and Prevents Colitis Disease Progression. J Immunol. 2015;195(10):4822–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Palmer E, Drobek A, Stepanek O. Opposing effects of actin signaling and LFA-1 on establishing the affinity threshold for inducing effector T-cell responses in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46(8):1887–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dolmetsch RE, Lewis RS, Goodnow CC, Healy JI. Differential activation of transcription factors induced by Ca2+ response amplitude and duration. Nature. 1997;386(6627):855–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marangoni F, Murooka TT, Manzo T, Kim EY, Carrizosa E, Elpek NM, et al. The transcription factor NFAT exhibits signal memory during serial T cell interactions with antigen-presenting cells. Immunity. 2013;38(2):237–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Crabtree GR, Olson EN. NFAT signaling: choreographing the social lives of cells. Cell. 2002;109 Suppl:S67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cenciarelli C, Wilhelm KG Jr., Guo A, Weissman AM. T cell antigen receptor ubiquitination is a consequence of receptor-mediated tyrosine kinase activation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(15):8709–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bachmaier K, Krawczyk C, Kozieradzki I, Kong YY, Sasaki T, Oliveira-dos-Santos A, et al. Negative regulation of lymphocyte activation and autoimmunity by the molecular adaptor Cbl-b. Nature. 2000;403(6766):211–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Friend SF, Deason-Towne F, Peterson LK, Berger AJ, Dragone LL. Regulation of T cell receptor complex-mediated signaling by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications. Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;3(3):107–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhuang C, Yang S, Gonzalez CG, Ainsworth RI, Li S, Kobayashi MT, et al. A novel gain-of-function phosphorylation site modulates PTPN22 inhibition of TCR signaling. J Biol Chem. 2024;300(6):107393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hawse WF, Cattley RT. T cells transduce T-cell receptor signal strength by generating different phosphatidylinositols. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(13):4793–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Laletin V, Bernard PL, Costa da Silva C, Guittard G, Nunes JA. Negative intracellular regulators of T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling as potential antitumor immunotherapy targets. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11(5). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brownlie RJ, Zamoyska R. T cell receptor signalling networks: branched, diversified and bounded. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(4):257–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lake D, Correa SA, Muller J. Negative feedback regulation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(23):4397–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Brenes AJ, Lamond AI, Cantrell DA. The Immunological Proteome Resource. Nat Immunol. 2023;24(5):731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Huang CY, Ferrell JE Jr. Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(19):10078–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Marklund U, Brattsand G, Shingler V, Gullberg M. Serine 25 of oncoprotein 18 is a major cytosolic target for the mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(20):15039–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lopez-Cabrera M, Munoz E, Blazquez MV, Ursa MA, Santis AG, Sanchez-Madrid F. Transcriptional regulation of the gene encoding the human C-type lectin leukocyte receptor AIM/CD69 and functional characterization of its tumor necrosis factor-alpha-responsive elements. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(37):21545–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu KQ, Bunnell SC, Gurniak CB, Berg LJ. T cell receptor-initiated calcium release is uncoupled from capacitative calcium entry in Itk-deficient T cells. J Exp Med. 1998;187(10):1721–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011. 2011;17(1):3. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2012;29(1):15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Alpine [Internet]. University of Colorado Boulder. 2023. Available from: 10.25811/k3w6-pk81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag; New York. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Samusik N, Good Z, Spitzer MH, Davis KL, Nolan GP. Automated mapping of phenotype space with single-cell data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(6):493–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1

Supplemental Fig. 1. Time course of expression of T cell activation markers in Itk+/+ versus Itk−/− T cells reveals distinct patterns of ITK-dependence.

Compilation of data from 0-72h timecourses show normalized MFI for each protein in cells expressing that protein. Data are mean +/−SD of normalized MFI (% experimental max) from 3-8 biological replicates in 3-5 experiments.

Supplemental Fig. 2 Mathematical modeling of protein expression estimates prolonged promoter activation of Nr4a3-Tocky Blue in Itk−/− CD8+ T cells.

Mathematical modeling showing estimated expression and promoter activation of Nr4a3 in Itk+/+ and Itk−/− cells when stimulated with low affinity OVA-T4 and high affinity Ova-N4 over the time course of 0-72h.

Supplemental Fig. 3. Principle component analysis verifies that Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells are transcriptionally similar upon isolation.

Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells were stimulated for 5, 12, and 24h with 10nM OVA-T4 then sorted for CD8+ T cells prior to bulk RNA-seq analysis. Unstimulated cells were analyzed in parallel as a control. Principle component analysis on 2-3 independent samples was performed.

Supplemental Fig. 4. Bulk RNA-seq analysis shows reduced transcription of T cell activation-induced genes in the absence of ITK.

Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I cells used for all studies were stimulated for 0, 5, 12, and 24h with OVA-T4 at 10nM, and then sorted for CD8+ T cells prior to bulk RNA-seq analysis. Graphs show transcript numbers (per million) for the indicated genes.

Supplemental Fig. 5. Unsupervised cluster analysis of intracellular markers shows delayed upregulation of genes in Itk−/− T cells.

Unsupervised clustering was performed on pooled cells from Itk+/+ and Itk−/− OT-I Nr4a3-Tocky T cells stimulated with 1nM OVA-N4 or 1nM OVA-T4 for 5h. Samples were downsampled to 3000 CD8+ T cells per condition prior to concatenation. TSNE pseudocolor plot shows distribution of clusters (left) and bar graph (right) show the percentages of cells in each cluster. Histograms (middle row) show normalized cell numbers present in each cluster. Heat map (bottom) shows relative expression of each protein within each cluster.

media-1.docx (5.6MB, docx)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES