Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2025 Aug 28;329(4):F444–F451. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00168.2025

Fatty Acids and Albumin are Transported by Distinct Mechanisms in the Proximal Tubule

Nestor H Garcia 1, Robert J Gaivin 1, Shenaz Khan 1, Vincent Li 1, Youssef Rbaibi 2, Ora A Weisz 2, Jeffrey L Garvin 1, Jeffrey R Schelling 1,3
PMCID: PMC12486159  NIHMSID: NIHMS2109138  PMID: 40875392

Abstract

Under physiologic conditions, proximal tubules depend on basolateral fatty acid (FA) uptake for metabolism. In pathophysiologic conditions due to glomerular filtration barrier disruption, albumin-bound FA undergo filtration and proximal tubule reabsorption, which leads to lipotoxicity and tubular atrophy. Apical proximal tubule albumin uptake is accomplished by the megalin/cubilin complex and receptor-mediated endocytosis, whereas apical proximal tubule FA uptake is primarily mediated by apical fatty acid transport protein-2 (FATP2). However, a commonly proposed (but untested) alternative model is that intact albumin-FA complex is co-transported by megalin/cubilin-mediated endocytosis, similar to apolipoproteins. Microperfused mouse proximal tubules demonstrated divergent one- vs. two-phase albumin and FA uptake kinetics, with significantly faster albumin compared to FA uptake. LLC-PK1, HPCT and OK proximal tubule cell lines all expressed megalin, cubilin and FATP2 mRNA, though in varying amounts. LLC-PK1 cells showed similar one-phase kinetics of dual fluorescently-labeled albumin and FA uptake, whereas HPCT cells demonstrated one-phase albumin and two-phase FA uptake kinetics, with significantly faster albumin compared to FA uptake (similar to perfused proximal tubules). FATP2 inhibition blocked FA uptake, but had no effect on albumin uptake in LLC-PK1 and HPCT cells. Megalin and cubilin deletion in OK cells inhibited albumin uptake, but had no effect on FA uptake. We conclude that apical proximal tubule albumin and FA are transported by distinct mechanisms, implying that FAs dissociate from albumin within the proximal tubule lumen prior to uptake.

Keywords: cubilin, Fatty Acid Transport Protein-2, fluorescence, kinetics, megalin

NEW & NOTEWORTHY

Reabsorption of aberrantly filtered albumin-bound fatty acids by the apical proximal tubule is important for chronic kidney disease progression. Whether fatty acids and albumin are taken up as intact complexes or dissociate within the lumen prior to uptake has been controversial. Data derived from in vitro and ex vivo models demonstrate separate albumin and fatty acid uptake kinetics, implying dissociation prior to uptake.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2109138-f0006.jpg

INTRODUCTION

In the proximal tubule ATP generation is achieved primarily through β-oxidation of long-chain (C14-C20) fatty acids (FA) to acetyl CoA, which subsequently enter the Krebs cycle (1). The greater ATP yield from FA compared to glucose metabolism fulfills the high metabolic demand of the proximal tubule (2). Intracellular FA accumulate by de novo lipogenesis, lipolysis or uptake from extracellular fluid. There are three sources of circulating FA: unbound/free FA, FA covalently bound to glycerol as triglycerides, or most commonly, FA non-covalently bound to albumin (3). The concentration of free FA in the circulation is ~7 nM, which is 105-fold lower than the bound concentration (4, 5). The extracellular release of FA from triglycerides is catalyzed by lipoprotein lipases (6), while FA dissociation from albumin is enzyme-independent, but still rapid (7).

Apical proximal tubule exposure to FA is infrequent, since albumin and triglycerides are too large to cross the glomerular filtration barrier. Even in glomerular injury associated with the nephrotic syndrome, the diameter of triglycerides exceeds the threshold for filtration (8), and are therefore unlikely to appear in the urine in large concentrations. However, glomerular filtration barrier injury permits albumin-bound FA passage into the ultrafiltrate, and apical proximal tubule FA reabsorption (9). The resulting apical plus constitutive basolateral proximal tubule FA uptake contributes to lipotoxicity-induced tubular atrophy (10).

In most tissues, FA uptake is achieved by membrane-localized transporters (11, 12). Several proximal tubule FA transporters have been described, including FA transport protein-2 (FATP2), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), CD36, and free FA receptor 1 (FFAR1) (1316). In whole animal organ surveys, FATP2 is most abundantly expressed in kidney, and within kidney, FATP2 localizes exclusively to the apical proximal tubule membrane (13, 17). Apical perfusion of FATP2 gene (Slc27a2)-deleted proximal tubules resulted in significantly diminished FA uptake (13), implying that FATP2 is the major apical FA transporter.

Despite the existence of proximal tubule FA transporters, the precise mechanism of apical FA uptake is still debated. In one model, FA and albumin dissociate within the proximal tubule lumen. Free FA are then reabsorbed by apical FA transporters, and albumin by the megalin/cubilin complex and receptor-mediated endocytosis (18). This paradigm is consistent with models of FA-albumin dissociation prior to transport in liver, heart and in vitro models (3, 1921). Furthermore, in diabetic mice Slc27a2 deletion reduced albuminuria (22), implying that albumin reabsorption increases in the setting of reduced FA uptake. However, a commonly cited alternative model persists, which proposes that intact albumin-bound FA are co-transported across the apical proximal tubule membrane, and then undergo intracellular dissociation within endosomes (2330). In this scenario, the primacy of FA transporters is diminished, and albumin-FA co-transport by megalin/cubilin receptor-mediated endocytosis has been inferred, in part because the megalin/cubilin complex is associated with uptake of other FA-containing ligands (31), such as apolipoproteins and liver-type FA binding protein.

Using ex vivo microperfusion and proximal tubule cell culture models, we examined whether apical proximal tubule uptake of albumin-bound long-chain FA is mediated by separate transporters or a single co-transport mechanism. We conclude that proximal tubule FA and albumin transport are distinct mechanisms, implying extracellular albumin-FA dissociation prior to uptake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Proximal tubule microperfusion.

Mouse S2 proximal tubule segments were microdissected and apically perfused with iFluor 350-labeled FA-free BSA (0.2 mg/ml, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) complexed with BODIPY-labeled FA (2.5 μM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to previously described methods (13). The fluorescence detection system was mounted on a Nikon TE2000 inverted microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Excitation λ = 345 and 490 nm pulses were delivered for iFluor/BODIPY, respectively, and emission λ = 450 and 510 nm were recorded at 6.7-sec intervals for up to five min. Images were recorded using a 40X immersion oil objective and a Coolsnap HQ digital camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ). Fluorescence measurements were recorded using Metafluor version 7 imaging software (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA). No differences were noted between tubules derived from male and female mice for any parameters (Figure S1). Therefore, equal numbers of male and female mice were used in each experiment. All studies were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.

FA-albumin dissociation in solution.

Palmitate (2.5 μM) was labeled with BODIPY and then complexed to 0.2% albumin as previously described (13). Unlabeled BODIPY was removed with a 7 kDa cutoff Zeba Spin Desalting Column (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). The albumin-palmitate complex was resuspended in 3 ml microperfusion buffer, and then dialyzed in tubing with 1 kDa cutoff (SpectrumLabs, Rancho Dominguez, CA), which was submerged in 1L microperfusion buffer. Aliquots (100 μl) from the dialysis bag were sampled hourly to determine loss of BODIPY fluorescence, as an index of dissociation. No unaccounted increase in fluid volume within the dialysis tubing was observed at any time point, indicating that the decline in sample fluorescence over time was not due to oncotic effects of 0.2% albumin, and water movement into the dialysis bag.

Proximal tubule cell lines.

Human HKCC cells were a gift from Dr. Lorraine Racusen (32), and are cultured on plastic in DMEM-F12 (Invitrogen) + 10% fetal bovine serum as previously described (33). Human proximal tubule cells (HPCT) were obtained from Dr. Ulrich Hopfer (34), and stably transfected with lentiviral vectors to overexpress human FATP2. HPCT cells were maintained on permeable supports in Keratinocyte-SFM (Thermo Fisher) + 1% FBS, then passaged to plastic wells, and grown to confluence for uptake studies. Porcine LLC-PK1 cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and maintained on plastic in DMEM-F12 (Invitrogen) + 10% FBS as previously described (35). Opossum kidney (OK-P subclone) parental and knockout (KO) proximal tubule cell lines were cultured on permeable supports in DMEM-F12 + 10% FBS as previously described (36), then passaged to plastic wells, and grown to confluence for uptake studies. CRISPR/Cas9 megalin (Lrp2) and cubilin (Cubn) KO OK clones were previously characterized (37).

Quantitative PCR.

FATP2, megalin and cubilin mRNA expression were determined by quantitative PCR using a QuantStudio 3 machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to established methods (38). Custom primers were purchased from Eurofins (Lancaster, PA). Primer sequences are listed in Table S1.

Fluorescent probe labeling.

FA-free bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M NaHCO3 was slowly mixed with Texas Red-X succinimidyl ester (10 mg/mL in DMSO). The reaction was stopped with 1.5 M hydroxylamine incubation (1 hr, room temp), and Texas red-coupled albumin was eluted from Zeba Spin desalting columns (7K MWCO, Thermo Scientific) with 20 mM HEPES/HBSS washes. The Texas red-albumin was then complexed with BODIPY-conjugated dodecanoic acid containing a four-carbon linker (C16-FA, QBT fatty acid uptake assay kit containing a quenching reagent; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, final concentration 2.5 μM in 0.2% albumin) according to previously described methods (13, 39). The fluorescence spectral properties of Texas red and BODIPY are shown in Table S2, and indicate similar luminosity ranges for both fluorophores. For microperfusion studies, identical methods were used to couple iFluor 350 succinimidyl ester (AAT Bioquest, Pleasanton, CA) to bovine serum albumin, which was then complexed with BODIPY-conjugated FA.

Uptake methods.

Cells were seeded in 96-well, black-walled, clear bottom polystyrene plates (Corning #3904, Corning, NY), and cultured to confluence over 24 h. Wells were washed with serum-free, phenol-free media for 2 h at 37° C. The co-labeled BODIPY-C16-FA/Texas red-albumin complex was robotically added at time = 0. Alternating excitation λ = 490 and 590 nm pulses were delivered for BODIPY/Texas red, respectively, and emission λ = 510 and 615 nm were recorded at 10-sec intervals for up to 10 min. Plates were imaged on the Synergy Neo2 HTX Multi-Mode Microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT) and averaged from six fields captured from each well using Gen5 software (Albuquerque, NM). Uptake curves were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v7 software (La Jolla, CA). The better fit for one- vs. two-phase kinetics was determined according to the curve with the greater R2 value. Furthermore, if the two-phase fit yielded the same fast and slow uptake half-life (T1/2), then the curve was assumed to be a one-phase fit and a single fast phase T1/2 and rate constant (K) are presented. IC50 values for Lipofermata (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ) were also calculated using GraphPad Prism software.

Statistics.

Albumin and FA uptake curves were quantified according to uptake half-life (T1/2) ± 95% confidence interval (CI) using GraphPad Prism software. Statistical significance between albumin and FA uptake curves is defined as the lack of 95% CI overlap. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise noted in the figure legend.

RESULTS

As an initial screen for transport of FA and albumin, the relative uptake kinetics were tested in freshly isolated mouse proximal tubules, perfused with BODIPY-FA complexed to iFluor 350-labeled albumin (spectral characteristics are shown in Table S2. Figures 1A1D are from a representative proximal tubule segment before and four minutes after perfusion. No difference in albumin or FA uptake was noted between male and female mice (Figure S1, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.16739355). Figure 1E and Table 1 correspond to curves that best fit two-phase kinetics for albumin, and one-phase kinetics for FA uptake. The initial uptake velocity was markedly faster for albumin [(K = 0.095 s−1, T1/2 = 7.3 s (95% CI 4.3–12.2s)] compared to FA [K = 0.012 s−1, T1/2 = 57 s (95% CI 56–61s)] (Table 1), whereas the slow phase of albumin uptake was comparable to FA uptake kinetics. The data indicate that apical FA and albumin are taken up by distinct mechanisms, rather than by co-transport, and suggest that FA-albumin dissociation occurs prior to uptake.

Figure 1. Albumin and FA uptake in microperfused mouse proximal tubules.

Figure 1.

Microdissected mouse proximal tubules were perfused with iFluor 350-labeled bovine serum albumin complexed with BODIPY-labeled fatty acids as described in Methods. (A) baseline iFluor fluorescence (emission λ = 450 nm) at time = 0, (B) iFluor fluorescence at 4 minutes, (C) baseline BODIPY fluorescence (emission λ = 510 nm) at time = 0, (D) BODIPY fluorescence at 4 minutes. (E), normalized iFluor-labeled albumin and BODIPY-labeled FA uptake over time. Results are mean from six experiments from three male and three female mice (see Figure S1 for sex-specific uptake graphs). Error bars are omitted for clarity. Uptake kinetics half-lives are significantly different between the two curves.

Table 1.

Albumin and fatty acid uptake kinetics in perfused mouse proximal tubules.

FA Albumin
R2 0.995 0.981
% fast 100 35.8
Kfast (s−1) 0.012 0.095
Kslow (s−1) N/A 0.008
Fast T1/2 (s) (95% CI) 57.1 (53/61) 7.3 (4.3/12.2)
Slow T1/2 (s) (95% CI) N/A 91.5 (62/213)

FA, fatty acids; K, uptake rate constant; T1/2, uptake half-life; N/A, not applicable

To explore the possibility of reagent instability as a non-physiological cause of FA-albumin dissociation, BODIPY-labeled FA coupled to albumin was reconstituted in perfusion buffer, and loss of fluorescence across a dialysis membrane with a 1 kDa cut-off over six hours was measured as an index of dissociation. In contrast to the rapid kinetics of fatty acid and albumin uptake by perfused tubules, Figure S2 demonstrates very slow decline in fluorescence (K = 0.51 hr−1, T1/2 = 1.35 hrs). Taken together, Figures 1 and S2 reflect transporter-facilitated FA-albumin dissociation mechanisms, rather than dissociation due to FA-albumin instability in solution.

To test for consistency between perfused tubules and in vitro models, we conducted experiments in LLC-PK1 cells, which are well-characterized for albumin and FA uptake (13, 4042). LLC-PK1 cells express FATP2, megalin and cubilin mRNA (Table S3). Figure 2A shows that FA and albumin uptake curves for LLC-PK1 cells most accurately fit a one-phase model. The initial rates of both FA and albumin uptake were rapid, and not significantly different (Table 2). For comparison, the same experiments were conducted in a human proximal tubule cell line (34), which expresses endogenous megalin and cubilin and was stably transfected to express FATP2 (Table S3). In these cells, albumin uptake obeyed one phase kinetics, whereas FA conformed to a two phase model (Figure 2B, Table 3), further suggesting that FA and albumin uptake are mediated by separate mechanisms in this cell line.

Figure 2. Albumin and FA uptake in cell lines.

Figure 2.

LLC-PK1 cells (A) and HPCT cells with stable FATP2 expression (B) were incubated with Texas red-labeled bovine serum albumin complexed with BODIPY-labeled fatty acids. A and B represent normalized uptake of fluorophore-labeled albumin and FA, which was measured every 10 seconds, as described in Methods. Each data point represents the mean from five experiments. Error bars are omitted for clarity. Uptake kinetics half-lives are not significantly different between the two curves in A, whereas the two curves in B are significantly different.

Table 2.

Albumin and fatty acid uptake kinetics in LLC-PK1 cells.

FA Albumin
R2 0.991 0. 740
K (s−1) 0.030 0.028
T1/2 (s) (95% CI) 22.9 (21.3/24.8) 24.7 (12.9/75.4)

FA, fatty acids; K, uptake rate constant; T1/2, uptake half-life

Table 3.

Albumin and fatty acid uptake kinetics in HPCT cells.

FA Albumin
R2 0.999 0.967
% fast 16.1 56.3
Kfast (s−1) 0.031 0.015
Kslow (s−1) 0.007 N/A
Fast T1/2 (s) (95% CI) 22.2 (10.6/45.1) 46.5 (40.0/54.6)
Slow T1/2 (s) (95% CI) 102 (86.7/222) N/A

FA, fatty acids; K, uptake rate constant; T1/2, uptake half-life; N/A, not applicable

FATP2 mediates apical proximal tubule FA transport (13, 22, 43). To address the possibility that FATP2 co-transports albumin, FA and albumin uptake studies were conducted in the presence of the FATP2 inhibitor, Lipofermata (39, 44). Lipofermata inhibited FA uptake, but had no effect on albumin uptake in LLC-PK1 (Figure 3A) or HPCT cells (Figure 3B). These data suggest that FATP2 does not co-transport albumin and FA.

Figure 3. Effect of FATP2 inhibition on albumin and FA uptake.

Figure 3.

LLC-PK1 cells (A) and FATP2-expressing HPCT cells (B) were pre-incubated with or without the FATP2 inhibitor Lipofermata (50 μM, 1 hr, 37o C). Albumin and FA uptake were then measured as in Figure 1, and data are shown without normalization. Each data point represents the mean from five experiments. Error bars are omitted for clarity.

To further investigate whether FATP2 co-transports FA and albumin, Lipofermata dose-response curves were generated for FA and albumin uptake in proximal tubule cell lines. Figure 4A demonstrates Lipofermata IC50 = 6 μM for FA uptake in LLC-PK1 cells, which is consistent with prior studies in other proximal tubule and liver epithelial cells lines (39, 44). In contrast, the IC50 for albumin uptake was >50 μM (Figure 4A). In HPCT cells, Lipofermata IC50 for FA uptake was 5 μM, and >50 μM for albumin uptake (Figure 4B). Taken together, Figures 3 and 4 strongly support that FATP2 transports FA, but does not co-transport albumin.

Figure 4. Lipofermata dose-response curves for albumin and FA uptake.

Figure 4.

LLC-PK1 cells (A) and FATP2-expressing HPCT cells (B) were pre-incubated with the FATP2 inhibitor Lipofermata at concentrations ranging from 0.01–50 μM. Uptake for Texas red-labeled albumin (TR-albumin) and BODIPY-labeled FA (BODIPY-FA) are measured as in Figure 1. Results are means from three experiments. Each data point represents mean static value at 60 sec, which correlates with maximum uptake velocity. Error bars are omitted for clarity.

To then address whether the megalin-cubilin complex co-transports albumin and FA, dual fluorescently-labeled FA plus albumin uptake was tested in OK proximal tubule cells with CRISPR-mediated megalin or cubilin deletion (37). Wild-type OK cells are well-characterized for albumin uptake, and express abundant endogenous megalin, cubilin, as well as FATP2 mRNA at relatively low levels (36, 45)(Table S3). Figure 5A reveals that the rate of Texas red-labeled albumin uptake in wild-type OK cells was similar to LLC-PK1 cells (Figure 2A). Albumin uptake was diminished in cubilin-deleted cells, and to a greater extent in megalin knockout cells (Figure 5A), consistent with the role of both proteins in proximal tubule albumin uptake. Figure 5B shows BODIPY-labeled FA uptake in wild-type OK cells, which was not inhibited in megalin or cubilin knockout OK cells. The Figure 5A and 5B data indicate that the megalin-cubilin complex mediates albumin uptake, but does not co-transport FA.

Figure 5. Effect of megalin and cubilin deletion on albumin and FA uptake.

Figure 5.

OK cells (green), and OK cells that underwent CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of cubilin (red) or megalin (blue) were assayed for albumin uptake (A) or FA uptake (B) as in Figure 1. Each data point represents the mean from three to six experiments. Error bars are omitted for clarity.

DISCUSSION

Proximal tubule reabsorption of aberrantly filtered albumin and non-covalently bound FA is critical for the pathophysiology of chronic kidney diseases associated with disruption of the glomerular filtration barrier. The accumulation of intracellular FA and FA metabolites may then lead to lipotoxic cell death and tubular atrophy. Although albumin and FA transport mechanisms have been well described, there is still considerable controversy regarding the mechanism of apical proximal tubule uptake. On the one hand, FA may dissociate from albumin within the proximal tubule lumen, and then be taken up by separate transporters. The alternative hypothesis is that FA-bound albumin is co-transported as an intact complex, by an uncharacterized mechanism, with subsequent intracellular dissociation (presumably within endosomes) (2330). Using a combination of ex vivo and in vitro approaches, as well as genetic deletion and small molecule inhibition, we demonstrate that FA and albumin are taken up by the apical proximal tubule through separate transport mechanisms. The implication then is that FA and albumin undergo dissociation within the luminal (extracellular) space prior to reabsorption by the proximal tubule.

If albumin and FA were co-transported and dissociation was intracellular, e.g., within endosomes or lysosomes, one would expect equivalent kinetics of albumin and FA uptake, which was not observed in ex vivo or most in vitro experiments. Furthermore, albumin-FA dissociation in the absence of cells was very slow, and inconsistent with the rapid uptake in the experimental models. While changes in ultrafiltrate pH due to NHE3 activity might exert a modest effect on FA-albumin dissociation, osmolality is unlikely to contribute to dissociation. We propose that an equilibrium exists between albumin-bound and unbound fatty acids within the circulation, as well as proximal tubule lumen; when fatty acids are taken up by transporters, this creates a gradient, which stimulates extracellular dissociation.

Few studies have examined kinetics of albumin or FA uptake. For albumin, the rate constant in cultured endothelial cells = 0.04 s−1 and t1/2 = 17 sec (46), which is consistent with our data in cultured and perfused proximal tubules. For long-chain FA (oleate) uptake in lipid vesicles, the first-order rate constant was 19 s−1 and t1/2 0.037 sec, and the rate-limiting step for FA uptake was FA dissociation from the albumin donor (21). Our data demonstrate relatively slower FA uptake kinetics, which may reflect the different systems (vesicles vs. intact cells). Although the rate constants and half-lives between albumin and FA uptake were not as divergent as in these two reports (21, 46), the differences between albumin and FA kinetics were significantly different, especially for microperfused tubules and HPCT cells. Moreover, FATP2 inhibition did not affect albumin uptake, and megalin and cubilin deletion did not affect FA uptake, consistent with megalin and cubilin siRNA knockdown inhibiting albumin uptake, but not palmitate-induced reactive oxygen species generation (47).

Kinetics measurements have previously been conducted in proximal tubules perfused with radiolabeled albumin for 90–120 min (48, 49), which likely correlate with the plateau, rather than the initial rapid phase of albumin uptake. That our method detected this initial phase is due to the capacity for frequent (every 6.7s) fluorescence measurements. Albumin uptake by clathrin-mediated endocytosis is complex, requiring adaptor protein recruitment from the cytoplasm and extensive cytoskeletal and plasma membrane rearrangement (50). This process is extremely active in the proximal tubule, with the velocity of membrane internalization corresponding to turnover of the entire surface of apical invaginations within 78 seconds (51). Our initial phase albumin uptake data are consistent with these rapid morphologic changes. Nevertheless, because the uptake T1/2 by transporters is typically measured in seconds, compared to minutes for many types of receptor-mediated endocytosis (52), it is surprising that the initial phase of albumin uptake was significantly faster than FA transport (Figures 1E and 2B).

Much of the data was generated in cultured proximal tubule cell lines, which have been viewed with caution for albumin uptake (41, 53). The major issue is loss of brush border in cultured cells, which renders a slower apical albumin uptake rate (41). Although the kinetic models differed slightly between HPCT cells and perfused tubules, both yielded relatively faster albumin compared to FA uptake rates. In contrast, LLC-PK1 cells, which have been extensively utilized for albumin uptake measurements (4042), demonstrated similar one-phase kinetics for albumin and FA. Kinetics studies were not conducted in OK cells, but megalin/cubilin-mediated albumin and FATP2-mediated FA uptake were observed (Figures 4 and 5), consistent with RNA sequencing data showing robust megalin and cubilin, and detectable FATP2 mRNA expression (45)(Table S3). If the perfused tubules are viewed as the standard, we would endorse HPCT and OK as reliable cell lines for albumin and FA uptake, whereas LLC-PK1 albumin and FA uptake kinetics are quite discrepant compared to perfused tubules. Furthermore, the similar kinetics of albumin and FA uptake in LLC-PK1 cells perpetuates the notion of co-transport, which was not observed in any of the other systems.

Gene expression patterns also differ between cells lines (45, 54)(Table S3), which may confer differences in function. To address this limitation, we employed loss of function strategies that focus on megalin/cubilin and FATP2 as the predominant regulators of albumin and FA uptake, respectively. The partial inhibition of albumin uptake in megalin and cubilin knockout OK cells (Figure 5A) is consistent with reports suggesting that both receptors are required for maximal uptake (37, 55). This point is reinforced by studies in Nphs2−/− mice with albuminuria, in which superimposed proximal tubule Lrp2 and Cubn deletion resulted in minimal increases in albuminuria, and no change in serum albumin (56).

FA uptake is also incompletely inhibited in perfused tubules from FATP2 knockout mice (13), implying the presence of additional apical FA transporters. Among other FA transporters, CD36 has been implicated as an albumin-FA co-transporter (15). However, proximal tubule CD36 expression is not conserved across species [(13, 57, 58), https://esbl.nhlbi.nih.gov/helixweb/Database/NephronRNAseq/All_transcripts.html, https://humphreyslab.com/SingleCell/], which casts doubt on the physiologic relevance. Moreover, in contrast to the importance of FATP2 in kidney pathophysiology (13, 22), proximal tubule-specific CD36 transgene expression had no effect on kidney disease (58). Expression of the G protein-coupled FA transporter, FFAR1, has also been detected by RT-PCR in proximal tubule (16, 59). However, in situ hybridization in kidney cortex revealed FFAR1 mRNA primarily in collecting duct (59), and neither FFAR1 mRNA by single cell RNAseq, nor protein expression by immunohistochemistry or proteomics were observed in proximal tubules from multiple species [https://cello.shinyapps.io/kidneycellexplorer/, https://humphreyslab.com/SingleCell/, https://esbl.nhlbi.nih.gov/Databases/KSBP2/, (13)]. Furthermore, the FFAR1 agonist PBI-4050 did not affect FA uptake in HKCC cells (39). So, although megalin/cubilin and FATP2 may not be singular mechanisms of apical proximal tubule albumin and FA uptake, no other pathways have emerged to challenge the preponderance of evidence that megalin/cubilin and FATP2 are the major mechanisms. Therefore, the use of megalin/cubilin and FATP2 loss of function strategies to clarify the plausibility of co-transport seem justified.

The current studies are focused on apical proximal tubule membrane functions, since uptake was not measured from the basolateral bath in the perfusion experiments, and in vitro, basal membrane adherance to plastic would limit substrate access. We previously demonstrated that FA uptake was approximately five times more rapid from the apical compared to basolateral surface, and FATP2 gene deletion had no effect on basolateral FA uptake (13). These observations are consistent with the magnitude of Lipofermata inhibition (Figure 3), and implies that the residual FA uptake in Lipofermata-treated cells is from basolateral transport. More detailed investigation would be facilitated by identification of the basolateral FA transporter(s), which are currently unknown.

The presence of separate apical proximal tubule albumin and FA transport systems logically suggests that uptake mechanisms for albumin and FA are distinct and not due to co-transport. However, this hypothesis had not previously been tested. In this report, we use ex vivo microperfusion and in vitro cell culture strategies to demonstrate that albumin and FA obey significantly different uptake kinetics. Furthermore, megalin/cubilin deletion does not affect FA uptake, and FATP2 inhibition does not affect albumin uptake. We conclude that albumin and FA are transported by distinct mechanisms, whereby the albumin-FA complex dissociates in the proximal tubule lumen prior to uptake by megalin/cubilin and FATP2.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Figures 1 and 2: https://zenodo.org/records/16739355.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Lorraine Racusen for donating HKCC cells, and to Dr. Ulrich Hopfer for donating HPCT cell lines.

GRANTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (2R01DK067528 to JRS, 5R01HL128053 to JL and U54 DK137329 OAW).

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES

The authors report no conflicts.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wirthensohn G, and Guder WG. Renal substrate metabolism. Physiol Rev 66: 469–497, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Darvey IG. What factors are responsible for the greater yield of ATP per carbon atom when fatty acids are completely oxidised to CO2 and water compared with glucose? Biochem Ed 27: 209–210, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van der Vusse GJ. Albumin as fatty acid transporter. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 24: 300–307, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richieri GV, and Kleinfeld AM. Unbound free fatty acid levels in human serum. J Lipid Res 36: 229–240, 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huber AH, and Kleinfeld AM. Unbound free fatty acid profiles in human plasma and the unexpected absence of unbound palmitoleate. J Lipid Res 58: 578–585, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang H, and Eckel RH. Lipoprotein lipase: from gene to obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 297: E271–288, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Demant EJ, Richieri GV, and Kleinfeld AM. Stopped-flow kinetic analysis of long-chain fatty acid dissociation from bovine serum albumin. BiochemJ 363: 809–815, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blouch K, Deen WM, Fauvel JP, Bialek J, Derby G, and Myers BD. Molecular configuration and glomerular size selectivity in healthy and nephrotic humans. Am J Physiol 273: F430–F437, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thomas ME, Morrison AR, and Schreiner GF. Metabolic effects of fatty acid-bearing albumin on a proximal tubule cell line. Am J Physiol 268: F1177–F1184, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schelling JR. The contribution of lipotoxicity to diabetic kidney disease. Cells 11: 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bonen A, Chabowski A, Luiken JJ, and Glatz JF. Mechanisms and regulation of protein-mediated cellular fatty acid uptake: molecular, biochemical, and physiological evidence. Physiology 22: 15–29, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kazantzis M, and Stahl A. Fatty acid transport proteins, implications in physiology and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1821: 852–857, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan S, Cabral PD, Schilling WP, Schmidt ZW, Uddin AN, Gingras A, Madhavan SM, Garvin JL, and Schelling JR. Kidney proximal tubule lipoapoptosis is regulated by Fatty Acid Transporter-2 (FATP2). J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 81–91, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mori Y, Ajay AK, Chang JH, Mou S, Zhao H, Kishi S, Li J, Brooks CR, Xiao S, Woo HM, Sabbisetti VS, Palmer SC, Galichon P, Li L, Henderson JM, Kuchroo VK, Hawkins J, Ichimura T, and Bonventre JV. KIM-1 mediates fatty acid uptake by renal tubular cells to promote progressive diabetic kidney disease. Cell Metab 33: 1042–1061.e1047, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baines RJ, Chana RS, Hall M, Febbraio M, Kennedy D, and Brunskill NJ. CD36 mediates proximal tubular binding and uptake of albumin and is upregulated in proteinuric nephropathies. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 303: F1006–F1014, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gagnon L, Leduc M, Thibodeau JF, Zhang MZ, Grouix B, Sarra-Bournet F, Gagnon W, Hince K, Tremblay M, Geerts L, Kennedy CRJ, Hebert RL, Gutsol A, Holterman CE, Kamto E, Gervais L, Ouboudinar J, Richard J, Felton A, Laverdure A, Simard JC, Letourneau S, Cloutier MP, Leblond FA, Abbott SD, Penney C, Duceppe JS, Zacharie B, Dupuis J, Calderone A, Nguyen QT, Harris RC, and Laurin P. A newly discovered antifibrotic pathway regulated by two fatty acid receptors: GPR40 and GPR84. Am J Pathol 188: 1132–1148, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park J, Shrestha R, Qiu C, Kondo A, Huang S, Werth M, Li M, Barasch J, and Susztak K. Single-cell transcriptomics of the mouse kidney reveals potential cellular targets of kidney disease. Science 360: 758–763, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eshbach ML, and Weisz OA. Receptor-mediated endocytosis in the proximal tubule. Annu Rev Physiol 79: 425–448, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fleischer AB, Shurmantine WO, Luxon BA, and Forker EL. Palmitate uptake by hepatocyte monolayers. Effect of albumin binding. J Clin Invest 77: 964–970, 1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van der Vusse GJ, Arts T, Bassingthwaighte JB, and Reneman RS. Intra-cardiac transfer of fatty acids from capillary to cardiomyocyte. PLoS One 17: e0261288, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thomas RM, Baici A, Werder M, Schulthess G, and Hauser H. Kinetics and mechanism of long-chain fatty acid transport into phosphatidylcholine vesicles from various donor systems. Biochemistry 41: 1591–1601, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khan S, Gaivin RJ, Abramovich C, Boylan M, Calles J, and Schelling JR. Fatty acid transport protein-2 (FATP2) regulates glycemic control and diabetic kidney disease progression. JCI insight 5: 136845, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anderson S, Komers R, and Brenner BM. Renal and systemic manifestations of glomerular disease. In: Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2008, p. 925–950. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruggiero C, Elks CM, Kruger C, Cleland E, Addison K, Noland RC, and Stadler K. Albumin-bound fatty acids but not albumin itself alter redox balance in tubular epithelial cells and induce a peroxide-mediated redox-sensitive apoptosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 306: F896–906, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simon N, and Hertig A. Alteration of fatty acid oxidation in tubular epithelial cells: From acute kidney injury to renal fibrogenesis. Front Med 2: 1–8, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuwahara S, Hosojima M, Kaneko R, Aoki H, Nakano D, Sasagawa T, Kabasawa H, Kaseda R, Yasukawa R, Ishikawa T, Suzuki A, Sato H, Kageyama S, Tanaka T, Kitamura N, Narita I, Komatsu M, Nishiyama A, and Saito A. Megalin-mediated tubuloglomerular alterations in high-fat diet-induced kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 27: 1997–2008, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pei K, Gui T, Li C, Zhang Q, Feng H, Li Y, Wu J, and Gai Z. Recent progress on lipid intake and chronic kidney disease. Biomed Res Int 2020: 1–11, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Molitoris BA, Dunn KW, and Sandoval RM. Proximal tubule role in albumin homeostasis: controversy, species differences, and the contributions of intravital microscopy. Kidney Int 104: 1065–1069, 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gerhardt LMS. From the beginning to the end: Effects of proteinuria along the renal tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol 35: 823–825, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Makhammajanov Z, Gaipov A, Myngbay A, Bukasov R, Aljofan M, and Kanbay M. Tubular toxicity of proteinuria and the progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 39: 589–599, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Christensen EI, Birn H, Storm T, Weyer K, and Nielsen R. Endocytic receptors in the renal proximal tubule. Physiology 27: 223–236, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Racusen LC, Monteil C, Sgrignoli A, Lucskay M, Marouillat S, Rhim JGS, and Morin JP. Cell lines with extended in vitro growth potential from human renal proximal tubule: Characterization, response to inducers, and comparison with established cell lines. J Lab Clin Med 129: 318–329, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schelling JR, Nkemere N, Kopp JB, and Cleveland RP. Fas-dependent fratricidal apoptosis is a mechanism of tubular epithelial cell deletion in chronic renal failure. Lab Invest 78: 813–824, 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Orosz DE, Woost PG, Kolb RJ, Finesilver MB, Jin W, Frisa PS, Choo CK, Yau CF, Chan KW, Resnick MI, Douglas JG, Edwards JC, Jacobberger JW, and Hopfer U. Growth, immortalization, and differentiation potential of normal adult human proximal tubule cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 40: 22–34, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khan S, Wu KL, Sedor JR, Abu Jawdeh BG, and Schelling JR. The NHE1 Na+/H+ exchanger regulates cell survival by activating and targeting ezrin to specific plasma membrane domains. Cell Mol Biol 52: 115–121, 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eshbach ML, Sethi R, Avula R, Lamb J, Hollingshead DJ, Finegold DN, Locker JD, Chandran UR, and Weisz OA. The transcriptome of the Didelphis virginiana opossum kidney OK proximal tubule cell line. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 313: F585–F595, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rbaibi Y, Long KR, Shipman KE, Ren Q, Baty CJ, Kashlan OB, and Weisz OA. Megalin, cubilin, and Dab2 drive endocytic flux in kidney proximal tubule cells. Mol Biol Cell 34: ar74, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lakhe-Reddy S, Khan S, Konieczkowski M, Jarad G, Wu KL, Reichardt LF, Takai Y, Bruggeman LA, Wang B, Sedor JR, and Schelling JR. ß8 integrin binds Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor-1 and activates Rac1 to inhibit mesangial cell myofibroblast differentiation. J Biol Chem 281: 19688–19699, 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kumar M, Gaivin RJ, Khan S, Fedorov Y, Adams DJ, Zhao W, Lee HY, Dai X, Dealwis CG, and Schelling JR. Definition of fatty acid transport protein-2 (FATP2) structure facilitates identification of small molecule inhibitors for the treatment of diabetic complications. Int J Biol Macromol 125328, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nielsen R, Birn H, Moestrup SK, Nielsen M, Verroust P, and Christensen EI. Characterization of a kidney proximal tubule cell line, LLC-PK1, expressing endocytotic active megalin. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 1767–1776, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Molitoris BA, Sandoval RM, Yadav SPS, and Wagner MC. Albumin uptake and processing by the proximal tubule: physiological, pathological, and therapeutic implications. Physiol Rev 102: 1625–1667, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Y, Cai H, Cebotaru L, Hryciw DH, Weinman EJ, Donowitz M, Guggino SE, and Guggino WB. ClC-5: role in endocytosis in the proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 289: F850–862, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Johnson AC, Stahl A, and Zager RA. Triglyceride accumulation in injured renal tubular cells: alterations in both synthetic and catabolic pathways. Kidney Int 67: 2196–2209, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ahowesso C, Black PN, Saini N, Montefusco D, Chekal J, Malosh C, Lindsley CW, Stauffer SR, and DiRusso CC. Chemical inhibition of fatty acid absorption and cellular uptake limits lipotoxic cell death. Biochem Pharmacol 98: 167–181, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Khundmiri SJ, Chen L, Lederer ED, Yang CR, and Knepper MA. Transcriptomes of major proximal tubule cell culture models. J Am Soc Nephrol 32: 86–97, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eskild W, Kindberg GM, Smedsrod B, Blomhoff R, Norum KR, and Berg T. Intracellular transport of formaldehyde-treated serum albumin in liver endothelial cells after uptake via scavenger receptors. Biochem J 258: 511–520, 1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Long KR, Rbaibi Y, Gliozzi ML, Ren Q, and Weisz OA. Differential kidney proximal tubule cell responses to protein overload by albumin and its ligands. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 318: F851–F859, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bourdeau JE, Carone FA, and Ganote CE. Serum albumin uptake in isolated perfused renal tubules. Quantitative and electron microscope radioautographic studies in three anatomical segments of the rabbit nephron. J Cell Biol 54: 382–398, 1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Park CH, and Maack T. Albumin absorption and catabolism by isolated perfused proximal convoluted tubules of the rabbit. J Clin Invest 73: 767–777, 1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Watanabe S, and Boucrot E. Fast and ultrafast endocytosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 47: 64–71, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Birn H, Christensen EI, and Nielsen S. Kinetics of endocytosis in renal proximal tubule studied with ruthenium red as membrane marker. Am J Physiol 264: F239–250, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maxfield FR, and McGraw TE. Endocytic recycling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 121–132, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Weisz OA. Considerations in comparing proximal tubule cell culture models. J Am Soc Nephrol 32: 2099–2100, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Park HJ, Fan Z, Bai Y, Ren Q, Rbaibi Y, Long KR, Gliozzi ML, Rittenhouse N, Locker JD, Poholek AC, and Weisz OA. Transcriptional programs driving shear stress-induced differentiation of kidney proximal tubule cells in culture. Front Physiol 11: 587358, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Long KR, Rbaibi Y, Kashlan OB, and Weisz OA. Receptor-associated protein impairs ligand binding to megalin and megalin-dependent endocytic flux in proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 325: F457–f464, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Weyer K, Andersen PK, Schmidt K, Mollet G, Antignac C, Birn H, Nielsen R, and Christensen EI. Abolishment of proximal tubule albumin endocytosis does not affect plasma albumin during nephrotic syndrome in mice. Kidney Int 93: 335–342, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Susztak K, Ciccone E, McCue P, Sharma K, and Bottinger EP. Multiple metabolic hits converge on CD36 as novel mediator of tubular epithelial apoptosis in diabetic nephropathy. PLoS Med 2: e45, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kang HM, Ahn SH, Choi P, Ko YA, Han SH, Chinga F, Park AS, Tao J, Sharma K, Pullman J, Bottinger EP, Goldberg IJ, and Susztak K. Defective fatty acid oxidation in renal tubular epithelial cells has a key role in kidney fibrosis development. Nat Med 21: 37–46, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ma SK, Wang Y, Chen J, Zhang MZ, Harris RC, and Chen JK. Overexpression of G-protein-coupled receptor 40 enhances the mitogenic response to epoxyeicosatrienoic acids. PLoS One 10: e0113130, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES