Abstract
Background
Numerous circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been detected in maternal blood. Initial studies in third trimester demonstrated differential miRNA expression profiles between uncomplicated pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia (PE). Recently, studies in first trimester have shown similar differential profiles, however, these studies were often under-powered.
Methods
We conducted a nested case-control study, in which serum samples, taken between 10 and 14 weeks gestation, were obtained from 413 singleton pregnant women, 126 of which later developed PE. Total RNAs were purified and a selection of 46 miRNAs plus two miRNA controls were quantitated by real time quantitative PCR.
Results
Seven of the miRNAs, hsa-miR-181b-5p, -323a-3p, -518b, -363-3p, -20a-5p, -29a-3p, and − 142-3p, could differentiate between uncomplicated pregnancies and pregnancies which develop PE, but only a single miRNA, hsa-miR-363-3p, could differentiate between mild and severe PE. A combination of all seven differentiating miRNAs was the best at discriminating between PE and uncomplicated pregnancies (AUC = 0.879).
Conclusion
First trimester maternal serum miRNA expression profile could differentiate between uncomplicated pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by PE. These circulating miRNA markers have the potential to improve risk assessment of PE in the first trimester, weeks before the onset of symptoms.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-025-08105-x.
Keywords: Circulating MicroRNA, Quantitative Real-Time PCR, First trimester, Pre-Eclampsia
Background
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a major cause of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Characterized by hypertension, frequently associated with proteinuria [1, 2], PE can damage multiple organ systems and affects approximately 2–8% of pregnancies globally [3, 4]. The onset of PE symptoms occurs most often in the third trimester, but can occur any time after 20 weeks of gestation. A considerable proportion of PE pregnancies require preterm delivery, with the risks associated with prematurity for the child [5, 6]. PE is associated with cardiovascular and other morbidity postnatally for both mother and child [7, 8]. Treatment with aspirin may reduce the risk of preterm PE if initiated prior to gestational week 16 [6, 9]. PE is subclassified into early- or late PE and whether it is associated with fetal growth restriction or not, and this heterogeneity may reflect different etiologies [10]. Early inadequate uteroplacental perfusion is considered the hallmark of PE [11], leading -ultimately - to maternal and fetal syndromes through endothelial dysfunction [12]. However, despite decades of study, the identification of maternal risk factors [13] and biomarkers [13, 14], and the design of first trimester risk algorithms that reasonably identify preterm pregnancies [12, 15], there is still a need for improving early pregnancy prediction models for PE and its various clinical presentations.
Since their discovery in the late 1990’s microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small (~ 22nts) non-coding RNAs have been reported as a potentially important class of biomarkers for several diseases [16]. MiRNAs serve a post-transcriptional regulatory function, typically, translational repression or degradation, with respect to their target mRNAs [16]. Cell and tissue specific miRNA expression profiles as well as their ability to be transported within and between cells enable miRNAs to be involved in diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes [17, 18]. At the time of writing, there are more than 1,900 human miRNAs published in miRBase, a searchable database of published miRNA sequences and annotation [19].
Circulating miRNAs (also known as extracellular miRNAs), have been extensively studied in body fluids, such as plasma, serum, urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, amniotic and follicular fluids [20]. These circulating miRNAs may be passively released from damaged cells or dying cells or they may be secreted bound to proteins [21, 22], or within extracellular vesicles [23]. Altered circulating miRNA expression profiles have been detected in patients with various diseases or disease stages [24]. Circulating miRNAs constitute useful biomarkers of disease and disease course and as they can be measured through non-invasive procedures may supplement or be preferable to current standard invasive tests, e.g. biopsies and chorion villous sampling [24].
Appropriate trophoblast proliferation is essential for normal placentation and pregnancy health in first trimester and human villous trophoblasts secrete placenta-specific miRNA into the maternal circulation via exosomes [25]. Consequently, numerous circulating miRNAs have been detected in maternal blood, and it has been demonstrated that their expression profile varies throughout pregnancy and between uncomplicated pregnancies and pregnancies with adverse outcomes [26]. Several studies have reported altered miRNA expression profiles in plasma and serum from women whose pregnancies were complicated with PE [27–34]. First trimester circulating miRNA markers have the potential to identify at risk pregnancies weeks before the onset of symptoms [29, 34–40].
Previous studies of circulating miRNAs in PE were mostly conducted with small sample sizes, and/or the samples were typically collected after onset of PE symptoms or following delivery [41]. Our study was performed on a comparatively large number of cases and controls (413 singleton pregnant women, of which 126 later developed PE) and serum samples were collected during the first trimester (10–14 weeks).
A panel of 46 miRNAs which are mostly pregnancy or pregnancy disorder related were investigated in this study [26, 35, 42–51]. Several of the miRNAs investigated play roles in regulating trophoblast proliferation, migration, and invasion, which are all critical processes for placental development. Notably, some miRNAs (miR-214-5p, miR-126) suppress these processes, potentially affecting Notch signalling and angiogenesis [52, 53]. Conversely, others (miR-95-5p, miR-590-3p) may promote them [54, 55]. In addition, miR-483 and miR-183 may influence PE by regulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway [56]. Furthermore, miRNAs like miR-206 and miR-320a show promise as potential biomarkers for PE [31, 57, 58]. Similarly, lncZBTB39 and circulating miRNAs (miR-206, miR-363, miR-149) warrant exploration as potential biomarkers [33, 59]. Our hypothesis is that the first trimester serum miRNA expression profile will be able to differentiate between uncomplicated pregnancies, and pregnancies complicated by PE. This differential profile may improve prognosis and diagnosis of PE in early stage of pregnancy.
Methods
Study design
This study was designed as a nested case-control sub-study, nested within the Copenhagen First Trimester Screening Study Cohort, collected from 1997 to 2001 [60]. A number of studies on Down syndrome markers and PE markers have been conducted using this sample set [61–65]. All samples were drawn during the first trimester (weeks 10–14).
Serum samples
Serum samples were selected from 126 cases (aged 18–46 years) who went on to develop PE with proteinuria (98 mild PE and 28 severe PE/Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome, classified according to clinical and paraclinical criteria from the Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [66]), and 287 (aged 19–43 years), parity, and gestational age at sampling matched controls who went on to have uncomplicated pregnancies. Basic clinical information is given in Table 1. All samples were collected in dry containers and kept at 4 ◦C for a maximum of 48 h until shipment to the Statens Serum Institut. Samples were subsequently stored at − 20 ◦C. The samples had been subjected to several freeze-thaw cycles prior to the measurement of miRNAs.
Table 1.
Maternal and fetal characteristics, known at time of testing, of cases and controls
| Controls (N = 287) | PE (N = 126) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| median (IQR) | median (IQR) | ||
| GA test (days) | 90 (88–94) | 90.5 (87–93) | 0.97 (0.89–1.07) |
| Maternal age (years) | 30 (27–33) | 30 (27–33) | 1.01 (0.96–1.06) |
| Maternal weight (Kg) | 62 (57–70) | 68 (62–69.5) | 1.04 (1.02–1.06) *** |
| Crown-Rump length (mm) | 67 (61–74) | 67 (61–72) | 1.00 (0.96–1.06) |
| mean (sd) | mean (sd) | ||
| Parity | 1.70 (0.97) | 1.70 (1.11) | 0.94 (0.76–1.17) |
CI confidence interval, GA gestational age, IQR inter quartile range, PE pre-eclampsia, sd standard deviation, *** p-value < 0.001
RNA purification to real time qPCR
The expression profile of 48 miRNAs (supplementary Table 1) were generated for all 423 serum samples. A variable number of analyses failed or insufficient material was present, consequently, the number of results per miRNA species is given in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Boxplots of delta Cq values for the seven miRNAs determined to have significantly different expression levels between uncomplicated pregnancies and pregnancies which went on to develop PE (mild or severe). Number of samples assessed per group is listed above each box. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001
The RNA purification and real time quantitative PCR (RT qPCR) were performed as previously described [67]. Briefly, total RNA (including microRNAs) was purified by Norgen total RNA purification kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Ontario, Canada) from 100 µl serum. 10 mM dithiothreitol and 1.7 pM of C. elegans synthetic miRs-39, −54, and − 238 (Tag Copenhagen A/S, Denmark) were added to a volume of lysis buffer sufficient for all the samples. This volume was then aliquoted out into 2 ml portions and kept at − 20 °C until used. The RNA was purified according to the instructions of the Manufacturer. Before elution of RNA 1 µl of RNAse inhibitor (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA, 20 U/µl) was added to every elution tube.
Reverse transcription (RT) was performed by the TaqMan microRNA RT kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with modification: RT reaction volume was 10 µl using 1 µl of MultiScribe™ reverse transcriptase, 3 µl of RT primer-mix (The RT-primer-mix consisted of equal volumes of each of 48 different 5X RT microRNA-specific stem-loop primers, Supplementary Table 1), 1 µl of 10X buffer, 0.2 µl of 100 mM dNTPs, 0.15 µl of RNAse inhibitor and 4.65 µl of the purified RNA. RT was performed on an ABI 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at 16 °C for 30 min, 42 °C for 30 min, 85 °C for 5 min, then hold at 4 °C.
Specific target amplification was accomplished using the TaqMan PreAmp master mix and a mix of 48 TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The pre-amplification mixture (10 µL) contained 2.5 µL of diluted cDNA (diluted 1:3 with H2O), mixed with 5 µL of 2X TaqMan PreAmp master mix and 2.5 µL of the 0.2X TaqMan miR-assay mix. Pre-amplification was performed at 95 °C for 10 min, 16 cycles of (95 °C, 15 s; 60 °C, 4 min), then hold at 4 °C.
Pre-amplified samples (diluted 1:5) and 20X TaqMan miR assays were applied to primed 96.96 dynamic array chips using loading and assay reagents according to the instructions of manufacturer (Fluidigm Corp., CA, USA). All 48 miRNA-assays were performed in duplicate. RT qPCR was performed in a BioMark system (Fluidigm Corp., CA, USA) using single probe (FAMMGB, reference: ROX) settings and the GE 96 × 96 standard v.1 protocol with 40 cycles. Data were processed with the Fluidigm real-time PCR analysis software (v. 3.1.3) using the auto-detectors setting.
Data handling
Average raw Cq scores above 35 were considered as out of the limit of detection. Average Cq values were first subtracted from the average Cq of the two Cel-miRs (cel-miR-54 & 238) for that sample to correct technical variance. The yielded -∆Cq (average Cq of the two Cel-miRs - average Cq of miR for that sample) values were used in further analyses. All -∆Cq values then were further normalized with the average -∆Cq of 10 microRNAs (hsa-miR-1, 20a-5p, 126-3p, 155-5p, 181b-5p, 222-3p, 223-3p, 299-5p, 323a-3p, 518b) detected in all samples to correct variations in total input RNA. These further normalized expression values were used for the statistical analyses.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.0.3). Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post hoc test and Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Gestational age at time of testing, maternal age, maternal weight, parity, and crown-rump length were assessed by logistic regression to determine which foetal/maternal factors were associated with developing PE. The ROCs, adjusted for maternal weight, was used to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of first trimester serum miRNAs in pregnancies which went on to develop PE. The AUCs were calculated and compared. The p-value < 0.05 represents statistically significant change.
Results
The profile of serum miRNA was investigated with a panel of 46 miRNAs (Supplementary Table 1) and 413 first trimester serum samples from either uncomplicated pregnancies (n = 287), or pregnancies (n = 126) which later developed either mild PE (n = 98) or severe PE/HELLP syndrome (n = 28). Four miRNAs (hsa-miR-181b-5p (P < 0.0001), hsa-miR-323a-3p (P < 0.0001), hsa-miR-518b (P < 0.0001), and hsa-miR-363-3p (P < 0.0001)) were up-regulated and three miRNAs (hsa-miR-20a (P < 0.0001), hsa-miR-29a (P < 0.0001), and hsa-miR-142-3p (P = 0.0004)) were down-regulated in pregnancies which developed PE (mild or severe) compared to uncomplicated pregnancy (Fig. 1; Table 2). Only hsa-miR-363-3p produced a statistically significant different expression level between mild and severe PE (P = 0.005) (Fig. 1).
Table 2.
Median (IQR) delta Ct values of significantly dysregulated MiRNAs
| Controls | mild PE | severe PE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| median (IQR) | median (IQR) | median (IQR) | p-value | |
| hsa-miR-181b-5p | 3.6 (3.3–3.8) | 3.9 (3.6–4.3) | 4.1 (3.8–4.4) | < 0.0001 |
| hsa-miR-323a-3p | 4.9 (4.6–5.2) | 5.3 (4.9–5.6) | 5.4 (4.8–5.7) | < 0.0001 |
| hsa-miR-518b | 4.7 (4.3–5.1) | 5.1 (4.7–5.4) | 5.3 (4.9–5.5) | < 0.0001 |
| hsa-miR-363-3p | −19.3 (−20.5 - −18.2) | −18.0 (−20.1 - −15.9) | −17.0 (−17.8 - −15.0) | < 0.0001 |
| hsa-miR-20a | −9.7 (−10.4 - −9.3) | −10.7 (−11.3 - −10.2) | −11.2 (−11.8 - −10.6) | < 0.0001 |
| hsa-miR-29a | −14.4 (−15.5 - −13.3) | −15.4 (−16.5 - −14.7) | −15.2(−16.7 - −14.6) | < 0.0001 |
| hsa-miR-142-3p | −14.5 (−15.8 - −13.5) | −15.4 (−16.3 - −14.5) | −15.3 (−16.4 - −14.5) | 0.0004 |
IQR inter quartile range, PE pre-eclampsia
Logistic regression analysis determined maternal weight to be significantly associated with developing PE (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02, 1.06) (Table 1). Receiver operator curves (ROC), adjusted for maternal weight, of the individual miRNA biomarkers found that hsa-miRNA-20a-5b (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.779), 181b-5p (AUC = 0.753) and 363-3p (AUC = 0.728) discriminated PE from uncomplicated pregnancy markedly better than the other miRNA biomarkers (Fig. 2). However, a combination of all seven miRNA biomarkers, adjusted for maternal weight, discriminated PE from uncomplicated pregnancies best (AUC = 0.879) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
The ROC curve of seven dysregulated miRNAs as well as a combination of all seven. ROC curves are adjusted for maternal weight
Discussion
Pregnancy involves many complex physiological events in which miRNAs might play a role. Embryo implantation and placentation are two critical steps for establishing pregnancy [68], however, current knowledge regarding the physiology of human placental cell proliferation, invasiveness, differentiation and apoptosis during the first trimester is limited. Research into the regulation of trophoblast activities by miRNA may help to address the pathophysiological basis of pregnancy disorders.
In this study expression profiles of 46 first trimester maternal serum miRNAs, mostly pregnancy or pregnancy disorder related, were investigated by RT-qPCR among 270 uncomplicated pregnancy, and 110 pregnancies which would go on to develop PE. We found seven miRNAs (hsa-miR-181b-5p, −323a-3p, −518b, −363-3p, −20a-5p, −29a-3p, and −142-3p) able to discriminate between uncomplicated pregnancies and pregnancies which would go on to be complicated by PE, but only hsa-miR-363-3p was able to discriminate between mild PE and severe PE. Several of these dysregulated miRNAs are known to influence placental functions e.g. trophoblast migration (hsa-miR-181b-5p and − 20a-5p) [69, 70], invasion (hsa-miR-181b-5p) [70], differentiation (hsa-miR-20a-3p) [69], and proliferation (hsa-miR-518b, −20a-5p, and −142-3p) [46, 69, 71], as well as angiogenesis (hsa-miR-20a-5p) [72] and apoptosis (hsa-miR-29a-3p) [69]. Furthermore, hsa-miR-518b, −20a-5p, and −29a-3p have been found to be upregulated, and hsa-miR-363-3p has been found to be downregulated, in either serum and/or placentae from women with PE [73], while hsa-miR-323-3p has been found to be a biomarker of ectopic pregnancy [51].
Several methods, such as next generation sequencing, nanomaterial-based methods, microarrays, qRT-PCR, and other nucleic acid amplification-based methods have been developed to detect miRNA expression [74, 75]. Despite the promise of these methods, qRT-PCR remains the gold standard in miRNA detection techniques [75]. However, the use of different methodologies in the field produces results which are difficult to compare. Combined with often very small sample sizes and a lack of standardisation regarding the collection, preparation and extraction of samples and analytical methods for miRNA analysis [76], e.g. there are no universally accepted internal controls for miRNA analysis, makes miRNA studies especially challenging. It is, therefore, not surprising that we see contradictory findings in studies of miRNA expression in PE. Furthermore, studies of miRNAs in PE frequently collect samples late in pregnancy, after the onset of symptoms, or during delivery [77, 78]. We found that hsa-miR-518b was upregulated in first trimester maternal circulation, thus confirming Hromadnikova et al.’s first trimester study findings [35]. However, our finding that hsa-miR-20a-5p and −29a-3p were both downregulated contradicts the findings of Jairajpuri et al. [79] and Wang et al. [72]. Jairajpuri et al., found that hsa-miR-29a-3p was upregulated in plasma samples taken from severe PE patients, these patients had developed PE and it is possible that the miRNA profile changes between first trimester and the development of symptoms. Additionally, this study compared eight severe PE patients with 11 normotensive women which may impact the power of this study [79]. Wang et al., found that hsa-miR-20a-5p was upregulated in placental tissue of severe PE patients [72], again these samples were taken at delivery and the miRNA profile may not be comparable to the first trimester miRNA profile in maternal circulation. Furthermore, this study too may be underpowered with 10 severe PE patients being compared to 10 normotensive women [72].
Large-scale prospective longitudinal studies in well-defined populations are necessary to further investigate the clinical utilities of various circulating miRNAs during early stage of pregnancy. The dysregulation of miRNA’s, measured in maternal circulation during the first trimester, indicates that placental dysfunction leading to PE can be ascertained before the onset of symptoms, and may be useful as a risk assessment tool. A combination of the miRNAs identified in our study and other first trimester ultrasound and serum protein biomarkers [80–83], metabolic and physiological parameters [62, 63, 65, 84–86] could be integrated into a multi-tiered risk stratification model. By generating a comprehensive risk score, this approach can significantly improve the accuracy of early PE prediction compared with current methods, and, consequently, improve PE prophylaxis, decreasing the health burden of the disease and its associated morbidities.
Conclusion
Pregnancies which develop PE can be differentiated from uncomplicated pregnancies using miRNA expression profiles from first trimester maternal serum, possibly allowing for improvement of existing practices related to risk assessment for PE. While large-scale, prospective longitudinal studies are necessary to validate these miRNAs as biomarkers, future investigations could utilize in vitro/vivo models and target gene interaction studies to further elucidate the functional roles of the identified miRNAs in PE pathogenesis.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the efforts of Dr Anting Liu Carlsen who contributed to the design of the study, performed the experimental work, and wrote the first draft of this manuscript. Unfortunately, Dr Liu Carlsen passed away before the manuscript could be completed.
This research has been conducted using the Danish National Biobank resource, supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
Abbreviations
- AUC
area under the curve
- HELLP
Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets
- miRNAs
microRNAs
- PE
Pre-eclampsia
- ROC
Receiver operator curves
- RT
Reverse transcription
- RT qPCR
real time quantitative PCR
Authors’ contributions
PLH, and MC conceptualized the study and curated the data, PLH, MC, and SOL devised the methodology for the study, KRW, ACS, SP, LR, ACG, KS, and AT collected data for the study, PLH performed the statistical analysis, PLH prepared the original draft of the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support to the Copenhagen First Trimester Screening Study from The Danish Medical Research Council, Copenhagen University, The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, The Ivan Nielsen Foundation, The Hede Nielsen Foundation, The Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborg Foundation, The Dagmar Marshall Foundation, The Egmont Foundation, The Fetal Medicine Foundation, The Augustinus Foundation, The Gangsted Foundation, The A.P.Møller Foundation, The Mads Clausens Foundation and Copenhagen Hospital Corporation.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Copenhagen First Trimester Screening study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Scientific ethics committee of the cities of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg (No. (KF) 01-288/97) and the Data Protection Agency. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
This paper is dedicated to the memory of our colleague and friend Dr Anting Liu Carlsen who co-designed and performed this study but unfortunately passed away before completion of the manuscript.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, Kapur A, Hadar E, Divakar H, McAuliffe F, da Silva Costa F, von Dadelszen P, McIntyre HD, et al. The international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(Suppl 1):1–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy*. Report of the National high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(1):S1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, Tita ATN, Oparil S. Preeclampsia-Pathophysiology and clinical presentations: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(14):1690–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Magee LA, Nicolaides KH. Von Dadelszen P: preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(19):1817–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rolnik DL, Nicolaides KH, Poon LC. Prevention of preeclampsia with aspirin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S1108–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chappell LC, Cluver CA, Kingdom J, Tong S. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):341–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garovic VD, White WM, Vaughan L, Saiki M, Parashuram S, Garcia-Valencia O, Weissgerber TL, Milic N, Weaver A, Mielke MM. Incidence and Long-Term outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2323–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, O’Gorman N, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D, Singh M, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):613–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tranquilli AL, Brown MA, Zeeman GG, Dekker G, Sibai BM. The definition of severe and early-onset preeclampsia. Statements from the international society for the study of hypertension in pregnancy (ISSHP). Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3(1):44–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aplin JD, Myers JE, Timms K, Westwood M. Tracking placental development in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(9):479–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chaemsaithong P, Sahota DS, Poon LC. First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S1071–Se10971072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743: Low-Dose aspirin use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(1):e44–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tan MY, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, O’Gorman N, Delgado JL, Akolekar R, Konstantinidou L, Tsavdaridou M, Galeva S, et al. Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(2):186–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wright D, Tan MY, O’Gorman N, Poon LC, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Nicolaides KH. Predictive performance of the competing risk model in screening for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(2):199. e191-199 e113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.O’Brien J, Hayder H, Zayed Y, Peng C. Overview of MicroRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mori MA, Ludwig RG, Garcia-Martin R, Brandao BB, Kahn CR. Extracellular mirnas: from biomarkers to mediators of physiology and disease. Cell Metab. 2019;30(4):656–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Makarova JA, Shkurnikov MU, Wicklein D, Lange T, Samatov TR, Turchinovich AA, Tonevitsky AG. Intracellular and extracellular microrna: an update on localization and biological role. Prog Histochem Cytochem. 2016;51(3–4):33–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Homo sapiens miRNAs. https://www.mirbase.org/summary.shtml?org=hsa.
- 20.Sohel MH. Extracellular/Circulating micrornas: release mechanisms, functions and challenges. Achiev Life Sci. 2016;10(2):175–86. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM, Ruf IK, Pritchard CC, Gibson DF, Mitchell PS, Bennett CF, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Stirewalt DL, et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of Circulating MicroRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(12):5003–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vickers KC, Palmisano BT, Shoucri BM, Shamburek RD, Remaley AT. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(4):423–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Turchinovich A, Weiz L, Burwinkel B. Extracellular mirnas: the mystery of their origin and function. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(11):460–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Condrat CE, Thompson DC, Barbu MG, Bugnar OL, Boboc A, Cretoiu D, Suciu N, Cretoiu SM, Voinea SC. MiRNAs as biomarkers in disease: latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Cells. 2020;9(2):276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burkova EE, Sedykh SE, Nevinsky GA. Human placenta exosomes: biogenesis, isolation, composition, and prospects for use in diagnostics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(4):2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barchitta M, Maugeri A, Quattrocchi A, Agrifoglio O, Agodi A. The role of MiRNAs as biomarkers for pregnancy outcomes: A comprehensive review. Int J Genomics. 2017;2017:8067972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Han X, Niu C, Zuo Z, Wang Y, Yao L, Sun L. MiR-342-3p Inhibition promotes cell proliferation and invasion by directly targeting ID4 in pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(1):49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hocaoglu M, Demirer S, Senturk H, Turgut A, Komurcu-Bayrak E. Differential expression of candidate Circulating MicroRNAs in maternal blood leukocytes of the patients with preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;17:5–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hromadnikova I, Dvorakova L, Kotlabova K, Krofta L. The prediction of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction via the first trimester screening of plasma Exosomal C19MC MicroRNAs. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(12):2972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li H, Ouyang Y, Sadovsky E, Parks WT, Chu T, Sadovsky Y. Unique MicroRNA signals in plasma exosomes from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2020;75(3):762–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liao G, Cheng D, Li J, Hu S. Clinical significance of microRNA-320a and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in early-onset preeclampsia patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;263:164–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sheng C, Zhao Y, Zhu L. Down-regulation of EDN1 gene expression by Circulating miR-206 is associated with risk of preeclampsia. Medicine. 2020;99(22):e20319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Whigham CA, MacDonald TM, Walker SP, Hiscock R, Hannan NJ, Pritchard N, Cannon P, Nguyen TV, Miranda M, Tong S, et al. MicroRNAs 363 and 149 are differentially expressed in the maternal circulation preceding a diagnosis of preeclampsia. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Winger EE, Reed JL, Ji X. First-trimester maternal cell MicroRNA is a superior pregnancy marker to immunological testing for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;110:22–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hromadnikova I, Kotlabova K, Ivankova K, Krofta L. First trimester screening of Circulating C19MC MicroRNAs and the evaluation of their potential to predict the onset of preeclampsia and IUGR. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jiang L, Long A, Tan L, Hong M, Wu J, Cai L, Li Q. Elevated microRNA-520 g in pre-eclampsia inhibits migration and invasion of trophoblasts. Placenta. 2017;51:70–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Singh K, Williams J 3rd, Brown J, Wang ET, Lee B, Gonzalez TL, Cui J, Goodarzi MO, Pisarska MD. Up-regulation of microRNA-202-3p in first trimester placenta of pregnancies destined to develop severe preeclampsia, a pilot study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017;10:7–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Winger EE, Reed JL, Ji X, Nicolaides K. Peripheral blood cell MicroRNA quantification during the first trimester predicts preeclampsia: proof of concept. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Devor E, Santillan D, Scroggins S, Warrier A, Santillan M. Trimester-specific plasma exosome MicroRNA expression profiles in preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(18):3116–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mavreli D, Lykoudi A, Lambrou G, Papaioannou G, Vrachnis N, Kalantaridou S, Papantoniou N, Kolialexi A. Deep sequencing identified dysregulated Circulating MicroRNAs in late onset preeclampsia. Vivo. 2020;34(5):2317–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yin Y, Liu M, Yu H, Zhang J, Zhou R. Circulating MicroRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;253:121–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Harapan H, Andalas M, Mudhakir D, Pedroza NC, Laddha SV, Anand JR. Micro RNA: new aspect in pathobiology of preeclampsia? Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2012;13(2):127–31. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jairajpuri DS, Almawi WY. MicroRNA expression pattern in pre-eclampsia (Review). Mol Med Rep. 2016;13(3):2351–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kochhar P, Dwarkanath P, Ravikumar G, Thomas A, Crasta J, Thomas T, Kurpad AV, Mukhopadhyay A. Placental expression of miR-21-5p, miR-210-3p and miR-141-3p: relation to human fetoplacental growth. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76(5):730–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li R, Wang N, Xue M, Long W, Cheng C, Mi C, Gao Z. A potential regulatory network among WDR86-AS1, miR-10b-3p, and LITAF is possibly involved in preeclampsia pathogenesis. Cell Signal. 2019;55:40–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mao Y, Hou B, Shan L, Sun X, Wang L. Aberrantly up-regulated miR-142-3p inhibited the proliferation and invasion of trophoblast cells by regulating FOXM1. Placenta. 2021;104:253–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Peng P, Song H, Xie C, Zheng W, Ma H, Xin D, Zhan J, Yuan X, Chen A, Tao J, et al. miR-146a-5p-mediated suppression on trophoblast cell progression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in preeclampsia. Biol Res. 2021;54(1):30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vashukova ES, Glotov AS, Fedotov PV, Efimova OA, Pakin VS, Mozgovaya EV, Pendina AA, Tikhonov AV, Koltsova AS, Baranov VS. Placental MicroRNA expression in pregnancies complicated by superimposed pre–eclampsia on chronic hypertension. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(1):22–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang D, Liu N, Tian Y, Li Y, Shen X, Chen Y, Wu F. Expression profile of Let-7s in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of normal and severe preeclampsia pregnant women. Exp Mol Pathol. 2019;110:104263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhao X, Wang Y, Li L, Mei J, Zhang X, Wu Z. Predictive value of 4-Hydroxyglutamate and miR-149-5p on eclampsia. Exp Mol Pathol. 2021;119:104618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhao Z, Zhao Q, Warrick J, Lockwood CM, Woodworth A, Moley KH, Gronowski AM. Circulating MicroRNA miR-323-3p as a biomarker of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Chem. 2012;58(5):896–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gong F, Chai W, Wang J, Cheng H, Shi Y, Cui L, Jia G. miR-214-5p suppresses the proliferation, migration and invasion of trophoblast cells in pre-eclampsia by targeting Jagged 1 to inhibit Notch signaling pathway. Acta Histochem. 2020;122(3):151527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu B, Liu L, Cui S, Qi Y, Wang T. Expression and significance of microRNA-126 and VCAM-1 in placental tissues of women with early-onset preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(6):2042–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ni H, Wang X, Qu H, Gao X, Yu X. MiR-95-5p involves in the migration and invasion of trophoblast cells by targeting low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(1):184–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhao L, Liang X, Ma Y, Li J, Liao S, Chen J, Wang C. AK002210 promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of trophoblast cell through regulating miR-590/NAIP signal axis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2020;688:108366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Han L, Luo QQ, Peng MG, Zhang Y, Zhu XH. miR-483 is downregulated in pre-eclampsia via targeting insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and regulates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway of endothelial progenitor cells. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(1):63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lai W, Yu L. Elevated MicroRNA 183 Impairs Trophoblast Migration and Invasiveness by Downregulating FOXP1 Expression and Elevating GNG7 Expression during Preeclampsia. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;41(1). 10.1128/MCB.00236-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Schlosser K, Kaur A, Dayan N, Stewart DJ, Pilote L, Delles C. Circulating miR-206 and Wnt-signaling are associated with cardiovascular complications and a history of preeclampsia in women. Clin Sci (Lond). 2020;134(2):87–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tian J, Liu Y, Hu M, Zheng Y, Xu P, Zhang L, Liao J, Wu Y, Wen L, Tong C, et al. Upregulated LncZBTB39 in pre-eclampsia and its effects on trophoblast invasion and migration via antagonizing the Inhibition of miR-210 on THSD7A expression. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;248:164–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wojdemann KR, Shalmi AC, Christiansen M, Larsen SO, Sundberg K, Brocks V, Bang J, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Tabor A. Improved first-trimester down syndrome screening performance by Lowering the false-positive rate: a prospective study of 9941 low-risk women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(3):227–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Laigaard J, Pedersen NG, Larsen SO, Hedley PL, Wojdemann K, Gjerris AC, Shalmi AC, Sundberg K, Tabor A, Christiansen M. ADAM12 in first trimester maternal serum from pregnancies conceived by assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(6):628–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Laigaard J, Sorensen T, Placing S, Holck P, Frohlich C, Wojdemann KR, Sundberg K, Shalmi AC, Tabor A, Norgaard-Pedersen B, et al. Reduction of the disintegrin and metalloprotease ADAM12 in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):144–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.de Knegt VE, Hedley PL, Eltvedt AK, Placing S, Wojdemann K, Shalmi AC, Rode L, Kanters JK, Sundberg K, Tabor A, et al. First-Trimester maternal serum adiponectin/leptin ratio in Pre-Eclampsia and fetal growth. Life. 2023;13(1):130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hedley P, Christiansen M. Serum leptin in first-trimester down syndrome pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(6):475–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hedley PL, Placing S, Wojdemann K, Carlsen AL, Shalmi AC, Sundberg K, Tabor A, Christiansen M. Free leptin index and PAPP-A: a first trimester maternal serum screening test for pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(2):103–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hypertension. og præeklampsi. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5467abcce4b056d72594db79/t/5bac84e7652dea0a1b5fb489/1538032877105/180924+PE-guideline-final+sandbjerg.pdf.
- 67.Carlsen AL, Schetter AJ, Nielsen CT, Lood C, Knudsen S, Voss A, Harris CC, Hellmark T, Segelmark M, Jacobsen S, et al. Circulating MicroRNA expression profiles associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(5):1324–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ochoa-Bernal MA, Fazleabas AT. Physiologic events of embryo implantation and decidualization in human and Non-Human primates. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hayder H, O’Brien J, Nadeem U, Peng C. MicroRNAs: crucial regulators of placental development. Reproduction. 2018;155(6):R259–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Miao J, Zhu Y, Xu L, Huang X, Zhou X. miR–181b–5p inhibits trophoblast cell migration and invasion through targeting S1PR1 in multiple abnormal trophoblast invasion–related events. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(5):4442–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liu M, Wang Y, Lu H, Wang H, Shi X, Shao X, Li YX, Zhao Y, Wang YL. miR-518b enhances human trophoblast cell proliferation through targeting Rap1b and activating Ras-MAPK signal. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang W, Feng L, Zhang H, Hachy S, Satohisa S, Laurent LC, Parast M, Zheng J, Chen DB. Preeclampsia up-regulates angiogenesis-associated MicroRNA (i.e., miR-17, -20a, and – 20b) that target ephrin-B2 and EPHB4 in human placenta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):E1051–1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ali A, Hadlich F, Abbas MW, Iqbal MA, Tesfaye D, Bouma GJ, Winger QA, Ponsuksili S. MicroRNA-mRNA networks in pregnancy complications: A comprehensive downstream analysis of potential biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tam S, de Borja R, Tsao MS, McPherson JD. Robust global MicroRNA expression profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies. Lab Invest. 2014;94(3):350–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ye J, Xu M, Tian X, Cai S, Zeng S. Research advances in the detection of MiRNA. J Pharm Anal. 2019;9(4):217–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pogribny IP. MicroRNAs as biomarkers for clinical studies. Exp Biol Med. 2018;243(3):283–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Baker AH, Delles C. Is microRNA-376c a biomarker or mediator of preeclampsia? Hypertension. 2013;61(4):767–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Li Q, Han Y, Xu P, Yin L, Si Y, Zhang C, Meng Y, Feng W, Pan Z, Gao Z, et al. Elevated microRNA-125b inhibits cytotrophoblast invasion and impairs endothelial cell function in preeclampsia. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jairajpuri DS, Malalla ZH, Mahmood N, Almawi WY. Circulating MicroRNA expression as predictor of preeclampsia and its severity. Gene. 2017;627:543–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.O’Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Alvarado M, Carbone IF, Dutemeyer V, Fiolna M, Frick A, et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(6):756–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Akolekar R, Zaragoza E, Poon LC, Pepes S, Nicolaides KH. Maternal serum placental growth factor at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(6):732–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Danielli M, Thomas RC, Gillies CL, Hu J, Khunti K, Tan BK. Blood biomarkers to predict the onset of pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhao S, Yin C, Zhai Y, Jia Z, Su S, Lu Y, Meng L, Li C, Liu X, Cong Y, et al. Serum peptidomic screening identified Circulating peptide biomarkers predictive for preeclampsia. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:946433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Christiansen M, Hedley PL, Placing S, Wojdemann KR, Carlsen AL, Jorgensen JM, Gjerris AC, Shalmi AC, Rode L, Sundberg K, et al. Maternal serum resistin is reduced in first trimester preeclampsia pregnancies and is a marker of clinical severity. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2015;34(4):422–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.De Villiers CP, Hedley PL, Placing S, Wøjdemann KR, Shalmi A-C, Carlsen AL, Rode L, Sundberg K, Tabor A, Christiansen M. Placental protein-13 (PP13) in combination with PAPP-A and free leptin index (fLI) in first trimester maternal serum screening for severe and early preeclampsia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(1):65–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Frithioff-Bøjsøe C, Lund MA, Lausten‐Thomsen U, Hedley PL, Pedersen O, Christiansen M, Baker JL, Hansen T, Holm JC. Leptin, adiponectin, and their ratio as markers of insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk in childhood obesity. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020;21(2):194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


