Skip to main content
Neuroprotection logoLink to Neuroprotection
. 2022 Dec 20;1(1):23–34. doi: 10.1002/nep3.9

Aspects of xenobiotics and their receptors in stroke

Aishika Datta 1, Bijoyani Ghosh 1, Deepaneeta Sarmah 1, Antra Chaudhary 1, Anupom Borah 2, Pallab Bhattacharya 1,
PMCID: PMC12486939  PMID: 41384255

Abstract

Stroke is devastating and the second leading cause of disability and death worldwide. The pathophysiology of stroke is intricate involving oxidative stress, ionic imbalance, and excitotoxicity leading to cell death. The current therapeutic strategies for ischemic stroke primarily aim to restore cerebral blood flow by removing clots using intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. However, hemorrhagic stroke requires different therapeutic interventions, where intravenous thrombolysis worsens the persistent condition. Nevertheless, the present treatment strategies do not provide effective neuroprotection as they have limitations such as narrow time window, specialized clinics and personnel, and higher expense. Therefore, studies on novel therapeutic strategies that can render neuroprotection over an extended time with minimum adverse effects are solicited. Xenobiotics are agents that are foreign to the biological system but can regulate their metabolism by binding to different xenobiotic receptors (XRs) to produce toxic substances. Modulation of XRs in different preclinical studies have shown benefits in the stroke outcome. Therefore, targeting XRs may be a future therapeutic strategy for stroke intervention. The present review briefly discusses various implications of xenobiotics and their receptors to evolve as a potential therapeutic target for prospective use as an adjunctive therapy for stroke.

Keywords: biotransformation, stroke, xenobiotics, xenosensors

Highlights

  • Xenobiotic receptors have role in regulating neuronal health in various neurological disorders.

  • Exposure to xenobiotics deteriorate stroke outcome.

  • Targeting xenobiotic receptors may be promising for stroke intervention.


Aspects of Xenobiotics and their receptors in Stroke: Stroke leads togeneration of excessive free radical mediated oxidative stress. Different xenobiotics such as superoxides, PAH, and so on can exacerbate this condition and lead to poor stroke outcome. Exposure to xenobiotics can also lead to blood–brain barrier breakdown and activation of various xenobiotic receptors that can increase apoptotic cell death. However, different chemical xenobiotics that are intended to act as drug interventions can render neuroprotection via alleviating neuroinflammation following stroke. (Image adapted from Servier Medical Art by Servier which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com/)

graphic file with name NEP3-1-23-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Xenobiotics are the chemical agents that are considered foreign bodies to organisms and are extrinsic to their normal metabolism. 1 This includes pesticides, environmental contaminants, occupational chemicals, foreign chemicals created by other organisms (such as histamine present in bee sting), drugs, and medications. There are several routes of xenobiotics entry to a biological system, such as respiratory tract (inhalation), dermal contact, gastrointestinal tract (ingestion), and accidental exposure by parenteral route. 1 Continuous exposure and accumulation of a high amount of xenobiotic are toxic. Therefore, they need to be metabolized to facilitate faster excretion and minimize toxicity. Xenobiotics undergo one or more of four metabolic fates such as unchanged elimination, unchanged retention, spontaneous chemical transformation, and enzymatic metabolism. In general, hydrophilic xenobiotics tend to be eliminated unchanged via urine, whereas lipophilic compounds prefer fecal elimination. Lead, cadmium, and several other inorganic substances most likely get retained unchanged within the body for long time that may lead to various deleterious biological effects. Organic xenobiotics get stored in the adipose tissue. Most of the xenobiotics do not get biotransformed by spontaneous chemical transformation, while enzymatic metabolism predominates their biotransformation. 1

Stroke is one of the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, while according to recent studies, case fatality may rise in coming years. 2 The reason behind this increase is multifaceted; however, different modifiable and non‐modifiable risk factors play a pivotal role in stroke prevalence. 2 Broadly, stroke is categorized as hemorrhagic (13%) and ischemic (87%). Both categories are influenced by a similar kind of risk factors; however, some differences can be noticed among their etiologies, 2 for instance, hypertension is an important modifiable risk factor for hemorrhagic stroke. It may contribute to atherosclerosis and, later on, to ischemic stroke. 2

In developing countries, where a high burden of hypertensive disorders is present, the prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke is reported. 2 However, people with increased Western style diet and lifestyle are becoming more susceptible to ischemic stroke. 2 This epidemiological transition creates the basis to study the influence of lifestyle hazards that may have an important role in stroke susceptibility. In this scenario, various particulate matters present in polluted air reported as an important xenobiotics that may complicate stroke etiology. 2 Therefore, the current review focuses on various aspects of xenobiotics and their receptors in stroke. To prepare this review, a thorough literature search was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using different keywords, such as xenobiotics, stroke, biotransformation of xenobiotics, xenobiotic receptors (XRs), and xenosensors. Studies describing involvement of various xenobiotics in stroke occurrence and prognosis were included. Various in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies that directly or indirectly relate xenobiotic and stroke are considered in this review.

2. CROSS‐TALK BETWEEN XENOBIOTICS AND STROKE

Xenobiotics can be categorized as exogenous and endogenous according to their sources. 3 The exogenous xenobiotics include various chemical compounds of foreign origin such as drugs, environmental pollutants, food additives, hydrocarbons, pesticides, synthetic polymers, and oil mixtures. 3 Endogenous xenobiotics are metabolites such as bile acid, bilirubin, and various hormones that may exert toxic effects similar to exogenous xenobiotics. 3 These can be further classified as weak, recalcitrant, and persistent according to their stability in the environment owing to their structural organization, which helps resist microbial biodegradation. 3 The recalcitrance of a xenobiotic compound typically depends on the type, number, and position of chemical bonds, which contribute to their xenobiotic characteristic. 4 According to fate, xenobiotics can also be classified as degradable and nonbiodegradable. Degradable xenobiotics such as vinyl chloride, toluene and pentachlorophenol can be biotransformed or cometabolized, while nonbiodegradable xenobiotics such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and ethidium bromide (EtBr) are highly toxic and may participate in detrimental biogeochemical changes. 3

About three‐quarters of global stroke can be prevented by modifying behavioral risk factors that are related to lifestyle hazard (such as smoking, poor diet, and low physical activity). In 2016, a study first identified and reported in Lancet Neurology that environmental air pollution is an emerging risk factor of stroke worldwide. 5 According to the study, air pollution and environmental risk related to ambient exposure of fine particulate matter <2.5 μm (PM2.5) contributed to 16.9% of stroke‐related disability‐adjusted life‐years (DALYs). Overall, DALYs related to air pollution and tobacco smoke (both active and passive) were 29.2% and 22.8%, respectively. 5 In a multipollutant model, exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO2) along with particulate matter is reported to increase stroke mortality up to 7% even in a city with low air pollution. 6 Long‐term exposure to air pollution particularly rich in nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in a region with European health‐based air quality has also reported increased ischemic stroke susceptibility. 7 Earlier, the pathogenic progression of ischemic stroke has been reported to be significantly related with air pollution that results in increased mortality. 8 Apart from air pollution, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are reported to result atherosclerosis along with thromboembolism, which ultimately leads to stroke. A study using the database from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database of stroke‐related hospital admission reported that POP exposure is an important risk factor of cerebrovascular disease. 9 Lead toxicity is another important xenobiotic‐related hazard that can exacerbate stroke outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports a 5.65% of global stroke burden in 2019 is accounted to lead toxicity alone. 10

In tropical countries, infections associated with pathogens (xenobiotic) are closely related to stroke prevalence. 11 Cerebral malaria, Chagas disease, and neurocysticercosis are the major central nervous system infections that may predispose transient ischemic attack (TIA). 11 , 12 Bacteria such as tuberculosis, syphilis, and brucellosis and viruses such as arenavirus, flavivirus, dengue fever virus, Japanese encephalitis, Nipah virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and so on, are various pathogens that can lead to stroke complications. 11 Recently, several studies also reported increasing clotting problems that resulted in a sudden rise of stroke mortality following Ebola and SARS‐CoV2 infection. 11 Cerebral infarction due to neurocysticercosis ranges from 2% to 12%; however, extensive epidemiological studies are required to infer a robust relationship between tropical infection pathogens and associated stroke risk. 11 A summary of different xenobiotics and their effects on stroke has been tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1.

Different xenobiotics and their effects in stroke

Xenobiotic Effect on stroke Reference
PM2.5 Enhanced stroke‐related DALYs Feigin et al. 5
SO2 Can increase stroke mortality up to 7% in a city with low air pollution Amancio and Nascimento 6
NO2 Can increase ischemic stroke susceptibility to normal individuals Avellaneda‐Gómez et al. 7
POPs Results in atherosclerosis and thromboembolism, leading to stroke Shcherbatykh et al. 9
Pathogen‐mediated CNS disorders
Cerebral malaria, Chagas disease, and neurocysticercosis Predispose TIA Reis et al. 11
Huang et al. 12
Tuberculosis, syphilis, and brucellosis High stroke risk Reis et al. 11
Arenavirus, flavivirus, dengue fever virus, Japanese encephalitis, and Nipah virus, HIV, Ebola, and SARS‐CoV2 High stroke risk Reis et al. 11
Drugs, dietary supplements, and alcohol Metabolites may act on various endogenous proteins, leading to vascular complications Hillbom and Numminen 13
Metals
Arsenic Predisposes atherosclerosis Reis et al. 11
Cadmium Can initiate and progress atherosclerosis, hypertension, and kidney damage, leading to stroke Reis et al. 11
Lead Exacerbates stroke outcome. According to WHO reports a 5.65% of global stroke burden in 2019 is accounted to lead toxicity Vongsfak et al. 10
PAHs Atherosclerosis Bang et al. 14
Tunicamycin, thapsigargin, brefeldin A, and DTT Predispose cell death following ER stress Lafleur et al. 15
Synthetic glucocorticoids Can be transported through the blood–brain and blood placental barrier, leading to exacerbation of stroke outcomes Craft 16
Balkaya et al. 17

Abbreviations: DALYs, disability‐adjusted life‐years; DTT, dithiothreitol; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; PAHs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PM2.5, fine particulate matter <2.5 μm; POPs, persistent organic pollutants; SO2, sulfur dioxide; TIA, transient ischemic attack; WHO: World Health Organization.

3. BIOTRANSFORMATION OF XENOBIOTICS

Continuous accumulation of various xenobiotics can lead to lethal effects. Therefore, these agents must be biotransformed to facilitate their excretion from the body to alleviate the toxic effects. 18 The biotransformation of xenobiotics includes several chemical changes in the parent compounds to alter their toxicological profile. 18 Hepatocytes are the major sites of xenobiotics biotransformation as they are rich in endoplasmic reticulum, which helps in optimum production of important enzymes that participate in biotransformation. 19 Accumulation of xenobiotics can activate XRs, which play a crucial role in catalyzing various immune reactions. 20 XRs regulate the expression of several phase I and phase II drug‐metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins, as well as coordinating with the hepatic defense network against xenobiotic threats. 20 Phase I of biotransformation involves enzymes such as cytochrome P450 oxidases, which biotransform xenobiotics through oxidation, reduction, or hydrolysis. 21 , 22 Phases II and III comprise glutathione S‐transferases that catalyze the conjugation of reactive electrophiles with glutathione and removal of GSH conjugates by transporters, leading to cellular protection 21 , 23 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Role of xenobiotics and their possible mechanism of action on exacerbating stroke outcome: Different xenobiotics can enter to the biological system via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. Following entry, they undergo biotransformation by phase I, II, and III reactions in hepatocytes with the help of various enzymes. The metabolic by‐products and their parent form further act on XRs that finally lead to exacerbation of stroke outcomes via excessive apoptosis. XRs, xenobiotic receptors. UPR, unfolded protein response. Source: Image adapted from Servier Medical Art by Servier which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com/and https://biorender.com/.

The biotransformation of xenobiotics can also be regulated by various factors that control generation of different biotransformational by‐products. The active concentration of accumulated xenobiotics is one of the major chemical factors that modulate the rate and route of enzymatic modification. 24 Some xenobiotics may activate particular signaling cascade, which enhances their metabolism, whereas other xenobiotics can inhibit their metabolism, which results in toxic effects. 24 The chemical nature such as the polarity of the xenobiotics also regulates their biotransformation via modulating their absorption capacity, which affects the rate of elimination from the body. 21 Xenobiotic interaction with various proteins also affects their clearance from the host. Apart from these, various environmental factors, like temperature, light, moisture, and ionizing radiation, may affect the rate of xenobiotics biotransformation. Different physiological states such as pregnancy, inflammation, infection, and fasting can play a pivotal role in the regulation of xenobiotic biotransformation as these factors can modulate the intrinsic enzyme activity, which regulates the rate of biotransformation. 25 Drugs, dietary supplements, and alcohol can also act as xenobiotics as they are external to the human body. Following biotransformation of these, the metabolites may act on various endogenous proteins that may result in vascular complications. According to research, a large amount of alcohol consumption can aggravate stroke risk. Alcohol contributes to high blood pressure, which may lead to hemorrhagic stroke. It can also result in atrial fibrillation, which is a major risk factor of cardio‐embolic stroke. Alcohol can also interrupt blood clotting, leading to hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke complications. 13 Metals are another important xenobiotics that precipitate atherosclerotic and blood clotting‐related complications, leading to stroke. Arsenic is reported to produce atherosclerosis, which is a well‐known risk factor of ischemic stroke. 11 On the other hand, cadmium can initiate and progress atherosclerosis, hypertension, and kidney damage, which lead to stroke. 11

Epoxide hydrolases (EHs) are involved in xenobiotic detoxification and endogenous epoxide biotransformation. 26 They catalyze the hydrolytic conversion of highly reactive epoxides to less reactive diols. As a result, EHs coordinate critical signaling pathways that maintain cell homeostasis. 27 EH plays a key role in xenobiotic metabolism due to its broad range of substrate selectivity and ubiquitous expression in the liver and other major organs. 27 Antagonizing EH enzymes by administering 4‐[[trans‐4‐[[(tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7] dec‐1‐ylamino) carbonyl] amino] cyclohexyl] oxy]‐benzoic acid (tAUCB) is reported to exhibit a beneficial effect in a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAo) model of cerebral ischemia, implicating EH as a novel therapeutic target in stroke. 28 Microsomal and soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) are the two mammalian enzymes that play a vital role in xenobiotic metabolism. 27 , 29 In stroke pathophysiology, there is an elevation in sEH levels, which complements an mEH spectrum of substrates that further increase biotransformation of xenobiotics, leading to the production of potentially harmful substitutes. 27 , 30 mEh inactivates reactive epoxides by converting them into diols, making them crucial components against epoxide like‐xenobiotics. 30

4. XENOBIOTICS AFFECTING STROKE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Continuous exposure to xenobiotics may deteriorate the outcome of ischemic stroke. 31 These can result in mitochondrial dysfunction, increase oxidative stress, disrupt blood–brain barrier (BBB), and increase apoptosis and autophagy. 21 , 32 , 33 Following stroke, the gastrointestinal mucosal flora gets considerably altered, which modifies the host immune system, leading to infection and alteration of the membrane transport system as well as xenobiotic degradation pathways. 34 The exact mechanism of how different xenobiotics can influence the predisposition and outcome of stroke is lesser known. Nevertheless, according to previous studies, exposure to xenobiotics post‐stroke can regulate enzyme metabolism, increase oxidative stress, and impair the balance between apoptosis and autophagy, which aggravate stroke‐mediated BBB disruption. 27 , 35 , 36 , 37

4.1. Alteration of BBB permeability by xenobiotics in stroke

The BBB controls the transport various endogenous and exogenous xenobiotics and their metabolites from the bloodstream to the brain. A collection of different transport proteins are expressed on the luminal (blood‐facing) and abluminal (brain‐facing) plasma membranes of endothelial cells from its basic foundation. 38 Some of these transporters enhance the permeability of the barrier to the necessary nutrients, while others selectively block xenobiotics from entering. 38 Poststroke BBB disruption allows xenobiotic entry to the brain, which exacerbates cellular damage and contributes to cognitive impairment. 32 Following stroke, the BBB gets compromised, which leads to excessive accumulation of xenobiotics in the brain that may exacerbate brain damage. 35 A key component of the BBB is P‐glycoprotein, which is an ATP‐driven efflux transporter that regulates the transport of drugs into the brain according to its expression level, selectivity, location at the luminal membrane, and high transport potency. 39 Several studies have reported that the expression of P‐glycoprotein in the BBB is crucial in regulating xenobiotics entry to the brain from the systemic circulation. 39 The expression of P‐glycoprotein in the BBB is higher in stroke, which is reported to alter sensitivity toward xenobiotics. 39 However, the mechanism of this altered sensitivity is still unclear. 35 In another study, activation of the XRs such as constitutive androgen receptor (CAR) is reported to increase expression of efflux pumps in the BBB, which can limit the xenobiotic entry into the brain. 40 However, reasons to what extent CAR and XR can alter the permeability of the BBB for xenobiotics is yet to be explored.

4.2. Alleviation of oxidative stress following xenobiotic exposure in stroke

Biotransformed metabolites are not necessarily toxic in all cases. Drugs are the exogenous xenobiotics that are intended to alleviate existing pathology. In the case of stroke, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other oxidative species play a pivotal role in exacerbating neurological damage. 41 ROS produced due to lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA oxidation leads to oxidative stress generation, which results in neuronal damage, cell death, and secondary brain damage following stroke. 41 , 42 , 43 The Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein 1–nuclear factor (erythroid‐derived 2)‐like 2 (Keap1–Nrf2) pathway is considered a significant signaling cascade in protecting the cells from oxidative and xenobiotic stresses (Figure 2). 44 Superoxide generated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) results in oxidative stress generation via continuous conversion of diones (quinones) to hydroquinones. 36 In mammals, Nrf2 (encoded by Nfe2l2 gene) is a transcription factor that acts as an antioxidant and regulates cellular redox homeostasis as well as phase II detoxification reaction of xenobiotics. 45 Nrf2 acts as cytoprotective via binding to the antioxidant response element (ARE) following heteromerization with the musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma (Maf) protein, which further regulates a battery of cytoprotective genes, including glutamate–cysteine ligase (GCL), thioredoxin reductase 1 (Txnrd1), NAD(P)H‐quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), and heme‐oxygenase‐1 (HO1). 45 This chain of events alters the oxidative state of cells and results in cellular protection. Following xenobiotic exposure, Nrf2 overexpression has been observed to upregulate the expression NQO1 gene. 45 , 46 Keap1 is a necessary protein involved in the regulation of this pathway, which ubiquitinates Nrf2 in the cytoplasm under normal conditions. 44 Following ubiquitination, Keap1 gets detached from Nrf2, which further gets stabilized when exposed to ROS. As a result, Nrf2 translocates into the nucleus and promotes the transcription of different cytoprotective genes. Various experimental animal models of ischemic stroke have demonstrated the beneficial role of the Nrf2/ARE antioxidant signaling pathway following exposure to different drugs (xenobiotics). 44 Dimethyl fumarate and monomethyl fumarate were reported to protect against acute brain damage and post‐stroke edema through anti‐inflammatory cytokines (interleukin [IL]‐10 and IL‐12 p70) related to the active Nrf2 pathway. 47 The Nrf2 activator sulforaphane pretreatment in the tMCAo model was reported to prevent the BBB breakdown via upregulation of HO1 expression. 48 The Nrf2 inducer tert‐butylhydroquinone is reported to reduce cortical damage and sensorimotor deficits up to one month in a mice model of ischemic stroke. 49 Trans‐resveratrol is reported as neuroprotective via upregulation of Nrf2 expression and mitochondrial antioxidants. 50 Apart from these, carbon monoxide, tetramethyl pyrazine, Korean red ginseng, and curcumin are also reported to induce the Nrf2 signaling pathway and have exhibited beneficial effects in the experimental stroke models. 51

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Role of different XRs following stroke: Following stroke, xenobiotics exposure and oxidative stress can be detrimental via activation of RXR and PXR, whereas activation of the PPAR exhibits neuroprotective activity by inhibiting apoptosis and reducing ROS generation. ARE, antioxidant response element; BBB, blood–brain barrier; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element; PXR, pregnane X receptor; PXRE, pregnane X response element; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RXR, retinoid X receptor; XRs, xenobiotic receptors. Source: Image adapted from Servier Medical Art by Servier which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com/and https://biorender.com/.

4.3. Cell death regulation by xenobiotics in stroke

Cerebral ischemia causes two types of apoptosis: the intrinsic mechanism, which is triggered by mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase 3 stimulation, and the extrinsic mechanism, which is triggered by activation of cell surface death receptors and caspase 8 stimulation. 52 Apoptosis is one of the major programmed cell death pathways where XRs have emerged as promising mediators. 53 , 54 One important XR is peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors (PPARs), whose agonists such as troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone have been reported neuroprotective in different CNS disorders, including cerebral ischemia. 37 The PPAR forms a heterodimer with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) to regulate various transcriptional genes, resulting in activation of the neuroprotective pathway. 37 However, xenobiotics promote apoptosis via inhibiting the PPAR activation pathway, which can further deteriorate the stroke outcome. 37 Apart from these, estrogen, progesterone, and mineralocorticoid XRs can mediate antiapoptotic signaling, whereas androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) are proapoptotic mediators. Estrogen receptor‐mediated antiapoptotic activity is one of the important factor of poststroke neuroprotection, Whereas progesterone receptor‐mediated antiapoptotic activity is particularly important in traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and ischemic stroke. 37

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the major site for xenobiotic biotransformation; therefore, parent xenobiotics and their metabolite can influence normal endoplasmic reticulum function. 15 Xenobiotics can block protein transfer from the endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi bodies, resulting in pooling of proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Therefore, new protein‐folding mechanism gets perturbed, which results in endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response (UPR) activation. Prolonged UPR pushes cells toward apoptosis. 15 Various xenobiotics, like tunicamycin, thapsigargin, brefeldin A, and dithiothreitol (DTT), are well known to predispose cell death following endoplasmic reticulum stress. 15

Apart from apoptotic cell death, stroke also results in ferroptosis, which is directly related to iron and amino acid metabolism. 55 , 56 Following ischemic stroke, iron accumulation increases in the brain via compromised BBB, which results in excessive ROS production by Fenton's reaction. 57 Increased expression of glutathione peroxidase (GPX) following xenobiotic exposure (carvacrol and several monoterpenic phenols) may rescue post‐stroke hippocampal neurons via alleviating ferroptosis. 58 According to Lanet et al., 59 Naotaifang, a compound in Chinese medicine, can limit neuronal ferroptosis following ischemic stroke by modulating TFR1/DMT1 and SCL7A11/GPX4 pathways. In hemorrhagic stroke, the occurrence of ferroptosis is inversely related to the expression of Nrf2. Nrf2 promotes GSH and GPX expressions, resulting in an enhanced antioxidant function. Selenium, another xenobiotic can also promote GPX expression and result in the alleviation of ferroptosis. 58 Parthanatos is another type of cell death pathway that results due to oxidative damage of DNA, leading to overactivation of poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP). Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymers induces apoptosis‐inducing factors that push cells toward death.

4.4. Xenobiotic preconditioning

Xenobiotic‐induced preconditioning in stroke is known as “pharmacological preconditioning,” which is referred to as increased tissue tolerance in long‐term ischemic injury. 60 It may limit cell death and infarct size and improve organ function. It is an effective neuroprotective method against stroke that can be attained by various agents. 61 Preconditioning with isoflurane is reported to induce iNOS‐dependent neuroprotection in rat pups following neonatal stroke. 62 An ATP‐sensitive potassium channel opener, Bimakalim, can exert the ischemic preconditioning‐like effect following myocardial ischemia, which further results in reduced infarct size. 63 Apart from this, various inflammatory cytokines and metabolic inhibitors can be exogenously delivered as a chemical preconditioning agent. 64

5. IMPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENT XRS IN STROKE

XRs are reported to play crucial roles in regulating neuronal health in various neurological pathologies, including stroke. 65 These receptors lack any physiologically relevant endogenous ligand. 65 Among various XRs, the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), pregnane X receptor (PXR), PPARs, and AhR have been subjected to substantial research owing to their dominance in controlling hepatic responses to medicines and environmental chemicals. 21 CAR and PXR are categorized in the nuclear receptor (NR) family and are also known as NR1i3 and NR1i2, respectively. 65 XRs regulate the transcription of drug‐metabolizing enzymes and transporters to break down and eliminate foreign particles from the body. 65 , 66

5.1. Pregnane X receptor

PXR and CAR have been extensively found in vasculature, where they regulate different vascular functions. 67 PXR, also known as the steroid X receptor (SXR) and pregnane‐activated receptor (PAR), is activated by a wide range of chemicals with no obvious structural similarities, including endobiotics like steroid hormone metabolites, vitamins, and bile acids, and xenobiotics like herbals, macrolide antibiotics, and antifungals. 21 PXR has been shown to target genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism (phase I and phase II) and efflux in the liver and gut. As a result, PXR is regarded as a “master regulator” of xenobiotic defense at the cellular and molecular levels. 21 Progesterone has been reported neuroprotective in various animal models of neurodegeneration, stroke, and traumatic brain injury. 37 An 18‐kDa novel translocator protein ligand ZBD‐2 can effectively prevent NMDA‐induced excitotoxicity and apoptosis in a mouse model of cerebral ischemia via pregnenolone and progesterone synthesis, which can be sensed by the PXR. 68 It may act as a master switch in stroke recovery and is reported to regulate NF‐κβ signaling and to maintain intestinal barrier integrity, which may affect stroke recovery. 69 The single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PXR gene also play an important role in ischemic stroke outcomes. 70 A 1‐year clinical study on platelet function along with genotyped SNPs of the PXR and cytochrome p450 was conducted on 634 stroke patients who were on antiplatelet medication. The study reports that SNP of a PXR variant rs13059232 can be an independent risk factor for patients in clopidogrel medication. However, the result was not similar with patients on aspirin medication. Therefore, rs13059232 can serve as preliminary evidence of a platelet function biomarker for poststroke clopidogrel therapy. 70 The PXR is reported to express in the brain and modulate neuronal plasticity. It involves clearance of cholesterol‐based steroids and neurosteroids. 71 It is an upstream factor for neuro‐steroidogenesis, which has a major role in the brain and behavioral plasticity. 71 The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and GR are reported to exert opposite roles in modulating synaptic plasticity, 72 whereas both can impair hippocampal synaptic plasticity and acquisition of related memories. 72

5.2. Constitutive androstane receptors

CAR is reported to play a pivotal role in bile acid metabolism, regulation of cholesterol level, and lipid and glucose homeostasis. 67 It is also a major regulator in cellular proliferation and cancer. 65 CAR activation can occur either through direct ligand binding within the receptor's ligand‐binding pocket or through the least defined indirect activation pathways. 73 Both of these mechanisms of interaction cause the receptor to be released from a cytoplasmic tethering complex, allowing it to proceed to nuclear translocation, dimerization with its RXR—a nuclear partner, and binding of the receptor dimer to requisite DNA motifs associated with CAR‐inducible genes. 73 To date, studies related to the CAR and its role in stroke regulation are limited. In a study involving the metabolism of thyroid hormone following middle cerebral artery occlusion in a rat model of ischemic stroke, the CAR level has been positively corelated with ischemia/reperfusion injury and hypothyroidism. 74

5.3. Aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhRs)

AhR signaling pathway activation is the primary molecular defense of body in response to xenobiotics. 67 Unlike the CAR and PXR, which have been limitedly studied, for almost 40 years, the AhR has been investigated and reported to be involved in several cellular processes. PAHs such as 3‐methylcholanthrene (3‐MC) and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs), such as 2,3,7,8‐tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin (TCDD), are common xenobiotic activators (ligands) of the AhR due to their high affinity toward the receptor. Atherosclerosis is a well‐reported risk factor of ischemic stroke. 14 AhR activation can lead to the activation of macrophages, dysfunction of vascular endothelia following an increase in adhesion molecules (ICAM‐1 and VCAM‐1), and generation of ROS, which is associated with atherosclerosis progression. 67 Activation of neural cell‐specific AhRs following ischemic stroke results in increased astrogliosis and decreased neurogenesis. Hence, the inhibition of the AhR can preserve neurogenesis and act as a promising therapeutic strategy. 75 In a mouse model of middle cerebral artery occlusion‐mediated cerebral ischemia, the tryptophan metabolite l‐kynurenine can act as endogenous AhR agonist, which participates in poststroke neuronal impairment. 76 Apart from these, the downstream genes of AhR (CYP1A1, GSTT1, and GSTM1) serve important roles in stroke outcomes. 77 A case–control study with 353 stroke patients reports a large number of CYP1A1 gene 3′‐flanking regions (T6235C) compared with 376 controls. The gene–gene interaction study also showed increased cerebral infarction risk in patients without GSTM1 but with CYP1A1c genotype. 78 Another study in the South Indian population has reported a significant association of CYP1A1cc genotype with stroke outcomes, whereas in a study conducted in the Chinese population, the said association reported opposite effects. 79 , 80 Therefore, further studies to investigate the role of the AhR in stroke must consider population‐wise genetic variations.

5.4. PPARγ and GRs in stroke

PPARγ is an another conventional XR whose agonist can exert a neuroprotective effect in various neurological pathologies, including stroke. 37 An RXR agonist bexarotene is reported to be beneficial in a mice model of cerebral ischemia as the RXR remains as a heterodimer with PPARγ. 81 The major mechanism of PPARγ‐mediated post‐stroke neuroprotection is due to the inhibition of apoptosis and attenuation of ischemia‐mediated ROS generation. 37 , 82 It can also regulate various inflammatory cytokines to modulate vascular inflammation. Various PPARγ agonists can cross the BBB and exert post‐stroke neuroprotection. 82

Synthetic glucocorticoids are qualified as prime example of xenobiotics. It has a wide spectrum of potencies and pharmacological characteristics. This is due to their relative and absolute affinity for the GRs, as well as their sensitivity for and accessibility of their associated metabolic enzymes, as well as their capacity to interact with and modify glucocorticoid‐responsive genes. 83 Synthetic glucocorticoids can pass the BBB and the placenta because they are extremely lipophilic. Certain evidence states that there may be a steady release of glucocorticoids during and after stroke. The animals express a greater GR in the most susceptible parts of the brain to ischemia damage, and persistent exposure to high glucocorticoid levels after stroke may render them affected by glucocorticoid‐induced ischemic cell death. 16 A study on 129/SV mice reports that the GR antagonist can help in the treatment of chronic stress‐induced stroke resulted due to endothelial dysfunction. 17

5.5. Estrogen receptors in stroke

Estrogen has been shown to provide a comprehensive regulation of neurons, including plasticity and neuroprotection in stroke. Anoxia, oxidative stress, glutamic acid, hydrogen peroxide, iron, and Aβ peptide are a few of the assaults that they protect neurons from. 37 However, the use of estrogens as a neuroprotective agent in humans has a number of drawbacks, mostly owing to the molecule's endocrine effect on peripheral tissues and that lead to an elevated risk of hormone‐dependent stroke. 37 Estrogen also has a role in neuronal plasticity and can help neurons survive following stroke. Mainly, it acts via estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, which can be activated by DNA demethylation following ischemic damage. 84 As a result, selective estrogen receptor modulators may be a viable alternative to estrogens in the treatment of ischemic stroke. After experimental ischemia, there is already evidence that SERMs imitate the effect of estradiol, minimizing hormone‐dependent concerns. Tamoxifen substantially decreased infarct size and protected neurons from ischemia in rats treated to permanent MCAO (pMCAO). 85 Recently, a novel type of estrogen receptor G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, formerly known as GPR30) broadly distributed throughout the brain might possibly play a crucial role in estrogen‐mediated neuroprotective benefits in pathologies like stroke. 86 This study reported that the GPER can be taken as a potential therapeutic target for stroke, mainly in males, as they cannot be exposed to estrogen therapy. 86

6. PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL STUDIES

Various preclinical studies carried out in the past few years have reported a promising role of XRs as a novel therapeutic target for stroke. Xenobiotic‐mediated induction of the Nrf2 signaling pathway is reported as a potential therapeutic strategy that may render long‐term neuroprotection. 51 However, rigorous clinical studies are needed to unravel robust mechanisms focusing on the Nrf2‐targeted interventions. A metagenomic study of different microbiota families using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) software predicted that poststroke xenobiotic exposure can result in larger infarct size. 87 When PICRUSt was used to predict post‐stroke alteration in the mucosal (gastrointestinal tract) microbiota in mice, it demonstrated enhanced involvement with infections along with xenobiotic degradation. 34 Although any pathogen has not been clinically identified or any antibiotic has been established by clinical studies to specifically treat post‐stroke infections, bacterial pneumonia is one of the serious consequences of stroke. 88 A clinical trial, STROKE‐INF, based on patients older than 18 years suffering from poststroke dysphagia concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis is ineffective for poststroke pneumonia prevention. 88 Consecutively, preventive antibiotics in a stroke study also failed to establish third‐generation cephalosporin ceftriaxone as preventive antibiotics in adults with acute stroke, concluding the fact that parenteral antibiotics are not enough to prevent pneumonia in stroke. 89

Several genetic variations of xenobiotic transporters are reported as a common risk factor for both ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease. According to a metanalysis study, a SNP (Val12Met) in ABCG2 (encoding a sterol and xenobiotic transporter) gene may be a common link between coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke. 90 Pharmacological inhibitors of the BBB efflux transporters, such as P‐glycoprotein inhibitors, were subjected to a clinical trial, which allowed increased drug penetration into the brain. However, the study was a failure due to its higher systemic toxicity. 91 Substantial clinical studies on XRs reported an important role of xenobiotics as an important risk factor of stroke. Some important preclinical and clinical studies related to various aspects of xenobiotics and their receptors in stroke are tabulated in Table 2.

Table 2.

Preclinical and clinical trials on xenobiotics in stroke

Sl. No. Purpose Target Animal model/No. of patients Reference
Pre clinical studies
1 Activation of Nrf2 attenuates the brain damage Nrf2 MCAO/rat Liu et al. 51
2 Attenuation of oxidative stress by blocking P‐glycoprotein P‐glycoprotein 129/SV/WT mice Brzica et al. 92
3 Preventing BBB dysfunction by blocking P‐glycoprotein P‐glycoprotein MCAO/rat Davis et al. 91
4 Inhibiting apoptosis and mediation of ROS generation PPAR MCAO/mice Wnuk and Kajta 37
Clinical trials
1 Preliminary biomarker for platelet function in post‐stroke clopidogrel therapy Rs13059232 634 Chen et al. 70
2 Increase in cerebral infarction risk in stroke patients with increase in CYP1A1c genotype CYP1A1 gene 3′‐flanking regions (T6235C) 353 Moon et al. 78
3 Increase in cerebral infarction risk in stroke patients with increase in CYP1A1c genotype CYP1A1 gene 3′‐flanking regions (T6235C) 215 (South Indian population) Sultana et al. 79
4 Increase in cerebral infarction risk in stroke patients with increase in CYP1A1c genotype CYP1A1 gene 3′‐flanking regions (T6235C) 1162 (Chinese population) Zhang et al. 80

Abbreviations: BBB, blood–brain barrier; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

7. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

Regardless of current treatments for ischemic stroke in the form of thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, there are still requirements for novel therapeutic approaches that may render neuroprotection to an extended period. To date, investigations on XRs in the context of stroke have limited reports. However, modulation of XRs may be a promising approach for stroke intervention. Among all XRs, the AhR is well reported as it is widely present in the CNS and participates in various neurological regulations. Therefore, extensive study is required to unravel other novel XR‐mediated signaling pathways that may be implicated in stroke diagnosis and treatment. Robust study should also be carried out considering genetic variants, gender disparity, and age‐related pathophysiological changes in stroke to have a safer stroke therapy in future.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Aishika Datta: Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Bijoyani Ghosh: Writing – review & editing (supporting). Deepaneeta Sarmah: Writing – review & editing (supporting). Antra Chaudhary: Writing – review & editing (supporting). Anupom Borah: Writing – review & editing (supporting). Pallab Bhattacharya: Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (supporting). All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

No animal or human studies were performed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors acknowledge the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemical and Fertilizers, Govt. of India; National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, India and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, for the senior research fellowship grant of Ms. Aishika Datta (45/13/2020‐PHA/BMS) for providing funding. Images for graphical abstracts and figures were adapted from Servier Medical Art by Servier which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com/ and https://biorender.com/

Datta A, Ghosh B, Sarmah D, Chaudhary A, Borah A, Bhattacharya P. Aspects of xenobiotics and their receptors in stroke. Neuroprotection. 2023;1:23‐34. 10.1002/nep3.9

Aishika Datta and Bijoyani Ghosh contributed equally to this work.

Managing Editor: Ningning Wang

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Croom E. Metabolism of xenobiotics of human environments. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2012;112:31‐88. 10.1016/B978-0-12-415813-9.00003-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Boehme AK, Esenwa C, Elkind MSV. Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circ Res. 2017;120:472‐495. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mishra VK, Singh G, Shukla R. Impact of xenobiotics under a changing climate scenario. Climate Change and Agricultural Ecosystems . Woodhead Publishing; 2019:133‐151. Accessed October 08, 2022. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128164839000074 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fetzner S. Biodegradation of xenobiotics. J Biotechnol. 2002;10:1‐8. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:913‐924. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30073-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Amancio CT, Nascimento LF. Environmental pollution and deaths due to stroke in a city with low levels of air pollution: ecological time series study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132:353‐358. 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1326733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Avellaneda‐Gómez C, Vivanco‐Hidalgo RM, Olmos S, et al. Air pollution and surrounding greenness in relation to ischemic stroke: a population‐based cohort study. Environ Int. 2022;161:107147. 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hong YC, Lee JT, Kim H, Kwon HJ. Air pollution: a new risk factor in ischemic stroke mortality. Stroke. 2002;33:2165‐2169. 10.1161/01.STR.0000026865.52610.5B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Shcherbatykh I, Huang X, Lessner L, Carpenter DO. Hazardous waste sites and stroke in New York State. Environ Health. 2005;4:18. 10.1186/1476-069X-4-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vongsfak J, Pratchayasakul W, Apaijai N, Vaniyapong T, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn SC. The alterations in mitochondrial dynamics following cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Antioxidants. 2021;10:1384. 10.3390/antiox10091384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Reis J, Giroud M, Kokubo Y. Environmental risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular disease. Ency Cardiovasc Res Med. 2018:238‐247. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809657-4.64111-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Huang X, Hussain B, Chang J. Peripheral inflammation and blood–brain barrier disruption: effects and mechanisms. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27:36‐47. 10.1111/cns.13569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hillbom M, Numminen H. Alcohol and stroke: pathophysiologic mechanisms. Neuroepidemiology. 1998;17:281‐287. 10.1159/000026181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bang OY, Ovbiagele B, Kim JS. Nontraditional risk factors for ischemic stroke: an update. Stroke. 2015;46:3571‐3578. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lafleur MA, Stevens JL, Lawrence JW. Xenobiotic perturbation of ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41:235‐262. 10.1177/0192623312470764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Craft TK. Psychological determinants of stroke outcome in mice. The Ohio State University; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Balkaya M, Prinz V, Custodis F, et al. Stress worsens endothelial function and ischemic stroke via glucocorticoids. Stroke. 2011;42:3258‐3264. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Gerba C. Environmental toxicology. Environmental and pollution science. 3rd ed. Academic Press; 2019:511‐540. Accessed October 18, 2022. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128147191000288 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sevior DK, Pelkonen O, Ahokas JT. Hepatocytes: the powerhouse of biotransformation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44:257‐261. 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Timbrell JA, Marrs TC. General, applied and systems toxicology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2009. Biotransformation of xenobiotics. Accessed October 10, 2022. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9780470744307.gat004
  • 21. Omiecinski CJ, Vanden Heuvel JP, Perdew GH, Peters JM. Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities. Toxicol Sci. 2011;120(suppl_1):S49‐S75. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Abdullahi SU, Wudil BJ, Bello‐Manga H, et al. Primary prevention of stroke in children with sickle cell anemia in sub‐Saharan Africa: rationale and design of phase III randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021;38:49‐64. 10.1080/08880018.2020.1810183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cai L, Yang C, Jia W, et al. Endo/lysosome‐escapable delivery depot for improving BBB transcytosis and neuron targeted therapy of alzheimer's disease. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1909999. 10.1002/adfm.201909999 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Esteves F, Rueff J, Kranendonk M. The central role of cytochrome P450 in xenobiotic metabolism—a brief review on a fascinating enzyme family. J Xenobiotics. 2021;11:94‐114. 10.3390/jox11030007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Morgan ET, Dempsey JL, Mimche SM, et al. Physiological regulation of drug metabolism and transport: pregnancy, microbiome, inflammation, infection, and fasting. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018;46:503‐513. 10.1124/dmd.117.079905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gautheron J, Jéru I. The multifaceted role of epoxide hydrolases in human health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:13. 10.3390/ijms22010013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zhang W, Koerner IP, Noppens R, et al. Soluble epoxide hydrolase: a novel therapeutic target in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1931‐1940. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Davis CM, Zhang WH, Allen EM, Bah TM, Shangraw RE, Alkayed NJ. Soluble epoxide hydrolase blockade after stroke onset protects normal but not diabetic mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5419. 10.3390/ijms22115419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Embrandiri A, Kiyasudeen SK, Rupani PF, Ibrahim MH. Environmental xenobiotics and its effects on natural ecosystem. Plant responses to xenobiotics. Springer; 2016:1‐18. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Decker M, Arand M, Cronin A. Mammalian epoxide hydrolases in xenobiotic metabolism and signalling. Arch Toxicol. 2009;83:297‐318. 10.1007/s00204-009-0416-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kim JH, Byun HM, Chung EC, Chung HY, Bae ON. Loss of integrity: impairment of the blood‐brain barrier in heavy metal‐associated ischemic stroke. Toxicol Res. 2013;29:157‐164. 10.5487/TR.2013.29.3.157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jiang X, Andjelkovic AV, Zhu L, et al. Blood‐brain barrier dysfunction and recovery after ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2018;163‐164:144‐171. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ozaydin FN. Xenobiotics and chronic disease. open access. J Toxicol. 2017;1:1‐2. 10.19080/OAJT.2017.01.555570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Stanley D, Moore RJ, Wong CHY. An insight into intestinal mucosal microbiota disruption after stroke. Sci Rep. 2018;8:568. 10.1038/s41598-017-18904-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Abdullahi W, Tripathi D, Ronaldson PT. Blood‐brain barrier dysfunction in ischemic stroke: targeting tight junctions and transporters for vascular protection. Am J Physiol‐Cell Physiol. 2018;315:C343‐C356. 10.1152/ajpcell.00095.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Henkler F, Brinkmann J, Luch A. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis induced by metals and xenobiotics. Cancers. 2010;2:376‐396. 10.3390/cancers2020376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wnuk A, Kajta M. Steroid and xenobiotic receptor signalling in apoptosis and autophagy of the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2394. 10.3390/ijms18112394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Miller DS, Bauer B, Hartz AMS. Modulation of p‐glycoprotein at the blood‐brain barrier: opportunities to improve central nervous system pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol Rev. 2008;60:196‐209. 10.1124/pr.107.07109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schinkel AH, Smit JJM, van Tellingen O, et al. Disruption of the mouse mdr1a p‐glycoprotein gene leads to a deficiency in the blood‐brain barrier and to increased sensitivity to drugs. Cell. 1994;77:491‐502. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90212-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang X, Sykes DB, Miller DS. Constitutive androstane receptor‐mediated up‐regulation of ATP‐driven xenobiotic efflux transporters at the blood‐brain barrier. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;78:376‐383. 10.1124/mol.110.063685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Niizuma K, Yoshioka H, Chen H, et al. Mitochondrial and apoptotic neuronal death signaling pathways in cerebral ischemia. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Basis Disease. 2010;1802:92‐99. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nikolova G, Karamalakova Y, Kovacheva N, Stanev S, Zheleva A, Gadjeva V. Protective effect of two essential oils isolated from Rosa damascena mill. and Lavandula angustifolia mill, and two classic antioxidants against l‐dopa oxidative toxicity induced in healthy mice. RTP. 2016;81:1‐7. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.06.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Komsiiska D. Oxidative stress and stroke: A review of upstream and downstream antioxidant therapeutic options. Comp Clin Pathol. 2019;28:915‐926. 10.1007/s00580-019-02940-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mitsuishi Y, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. The Keap1–Nrf2 system in cancers: stress response and anabolic metabolism. Front Oncol. 2012;2:200. 10.3389/fonc.2012.00200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kaspar JW, Niture SK, Jaiswal AK. Nrf2:INrf2 (Keap1) signaling in oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:1304‐1309. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Venugopal R, Jaiswal AK. Nrf1 and Nrf2 positively and c‐fos and Fra1 negatively regulate the human antioxidant response element‐mediated expression of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:14960‐14965. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Clausen BH, Lundberg L, Yli‐Karjanmaa M, et al. Fumarate decreases edema volume and improves functional outcome after experimental stroke. Exp Neurol. 2017;295:144‐154. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Alfieri A, Srivastava S, Siow RCM, et al. Sulforaphane preconditioning of the Nrf2/HO‐1 defense pathway protects the cerebral vasculature against blood–brain barrier disruption and neurological deficits in stroke. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;65:1012‐1022. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.08.190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Shih AY. A small‐molecule‐inducible Nrf2‐mediated antioxidant response provides effective prophylaxis against cerebral ischemia in vivo. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10321‐10335. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4014-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ren J, Fan C, Chen N, Huang J, Yang Q. Resveratrol pretreatment attenuates cerebral ischemic injury by upregulating expression of transcription factor Nrf2 and HO‐1 in rats. Neurochem Res. 2011;36:2352‐2362. 10.1007/s11064-011-0561-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Liu L, Locascio LM, Doré S. Critical role of Nrf2 in experimental ischemic stroke. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:153. 10.3389/fphar.2019.00153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Broughton BRS, Reutens DC, Sobey CG. Apoptotic mechanisms after cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2009;40:e331‐e339. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Fan Y‐J, Zong W‐X. The cellular decision between apoptosis and autophagy. Chin J Cancer. 2012;32:121‐129. 10.5732/cjc.012.10106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Farina M, Vieira LE, Buttari B, Profumo E, Saso L. The Nrf2 pathway in ischemic stroke: a review. Molecules. 2021;26:5001. 10.3390/molecules26165001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Datta A, Sarmah D, Mounica L, et al. Cell death pathways in ischemic stroke and targeted pharmacotherapy. Transl Stroke Res. 2020;11:1185‐1202. 10.1007/s12975-020-00806-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 2017;171:273‐285. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Liu J, Guo Z‐N, Yan X‐L, et al. Crosstalk between autophagy and ferroptosis and its putative role in ischemic stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:577403. 10.3389/fncel.2020.577403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Zhang Y, Lu X, Tai B, Li W, Li T. Ferroptosis and its multifaceted roles in cerebral stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:615372. 10.3389/fncel.2021.615372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lan B, Ge J, Cheng S, et al. Extract of Naotaifang, a compound Chinese herbal Medicine, protects neuron ferroptosis induced by acute cerebral ischemia in rats. Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2020;18:344‐350. 10.1016/j.joim.2020.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Zhu Y, Sun Y, Hu J, Pan Z. Insight into the mechanism of exercise preconditioning in ischemic stroke. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:866360. 10.3389/fphar.2022.866360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Ma D, Hossain M, Pettet GK, et al. Xenon preconditioning reduces brain damage from neonatal asphyxia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:199‐208. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Zhao P, Zuo Z. Isoflurane preconditioning induces neuroprotection that is inducible nitric oxide synthase–dependent in neonatal rats. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:695‐703. 10.1097/00000542-200409000-00018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Mizumura T, Nithipatikom K, Gross GJ. Bimakalim, an ATP‐sensitive potassium channel opener, mimics the effects of ischemic preconditioning to reduce infarct size, adenosine release, and neutrophil function in dogs. Circulation. 1995;92:1236‐1245. 10.1161/01.CIR.92.5.1236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Lo E, Desai R, Esposito E, Ji X. Pharmacologic pre‐and postconditioning for stroke: basic mechanisms and translational opportunity. Brain Circulation. 2015;1:104. 10.4103/2394-8108.166380 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Mackowiak B, Hodge J, Stern S, Wang H. The roles of xenobiotic receptors: beyond chemical disposition. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018;46:1361‐1371. 10.1124/dmd.118.081042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Wang YM, Ong SS, Chai SC, Chen T. Role of CAR and PXR in xenobiotic sensing and metabolism. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012;8:803‐817. 10.1517/17425255.2012.685237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Xiao L, Zhang Z, Luo X. Roles of xenobiotic receptors in vascular pathophysiology. Circ J. 2014;78:1520‐1530. 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Li XB, Guo HL, Shi TY, et al. Neuroprotective effects of a novel translocator protein (18 kD a) ligand, ZBD‐2, against focal cerebral ischemia and NMDA‐induced neurotoxicity. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2015;42:1068‐1074. 10.1111/1440-1681.12460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Grenier J, Koellhoffer E, Townshend C, McCullough L, Khanna K. Abstract T P225: loss of pregnane X receptor impairs stroke recovery. Stroke. 2015;46(Suppl_1):AT225. 10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.tp225 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Chen Y, Zhou Z, Li G, et al. Influences of an NR1I2 polymorphism on heterogeneous antiplatelet reactivity responses to clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2019;40:762‐768. 10.1038/s41401-018-0178-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Frye CA, Koonce CJ, Walf AA. The pregnane xenobiotic receptor, a prominent liver factor, has actions in the midbrain for neurosteroid synthesis and behavioral/neural plasticity of female rats. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:60. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Avital A. Contrasting roles of corticosteroid receptors in hippocampal plasticity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:9130‐9134. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1628-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Chang TKH. Activation of pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) by herbal medicines. AAPS J. 2009;11:590‐601. 10.1208/s12248-009-9135-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Daujat‐Chavanieu M, Gerbal‐Chaloin S. Regulation of CAR and PXR expression in health and disease. Cells. 2020;9:2395. 10.3390/cells9112395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Chen WC, Chang LH, Huang SS, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulates stroke‐induced astrogliosis and neurogenesis in the adult mouse brain. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:187. 10.1186/s12974-019-1572-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Cuartero MI, Ballesteros I, de la Parra J, et al. L‐kynurenine/aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway mediates brain damage after experimental stroke. Circulation. 2014;130:2040‐2051. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Zhu K, Meng Q, Zhang Z, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway: role, regulation and intervention in atherosclerosis therapy review. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20:4763‐4773. 10.3892/mmr.2019.10748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Moon KS, Lee HJ, Hong SH, Kim HM, Um JY. CYP1A1 and GSTM1/T1 genetic variation in predicting risk for cerebral infarction. J Mol Neurosci. 2007;32:155‐159. 10.1007/s12031-007-0028-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Sultana S, Kolla VK, Peddireddy V, et al. Association of CYP1A1 gene polymorphism with ischemic stroke in south Indian population. Transl Stroke Res. 2011;2:26‐32. 10.1007/s12975-010-0059-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Zhang M, Wu J, Zhang Q‐S, Yan D, Ren L, Li W. The association of CYP1A1 genetic polymorphisms and additional gene–gene interaction with ischemic stroke in the eastern Han of China. Neurol Sci. 2016;37:1679‐1684. 10.1007/s10072-016-2652-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Certo M, Endo Y, Ohta K, Sakurada S, Bagetta G, Amantea D. Activation of RXR/PPARγ underlies neuroprotection by bexarotene in ischemic stroke. Pharmacol Res. 2015;102:298‐307. 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Vemuganti R. Therapeutic potential of PPARγ activation in stroke. PPAR Res. 2008;2008:1‐9. 10.1155/2008/461981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Kadmiel M, Cidlowski JA. Glucocorticoid receptor signaling in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34:518‐530. 10.1016/j.tips.2013.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Lin HF, Hsi E, Liao YC, et al. Demethylation of circulating estrogen receptor alpha gene in cerebral ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139608. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Rzemieniec J, Castiglioni L, Gelosa P, Muluhie M, Mercuriali B, Sironi L. Nuclear receptors in myocardial and cerebral ischemia—mechanisms of action and therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:12326. 10.3390/ijms222212326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Broughton BRS, Brait VH, Guida E, et al. Stroke increases g protein‐coupled estrogen receptor expression in the brain of Male but not female mice. Neurosignals. 2013;21:229‐239. 10.1159/000338019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Benakis C, Poon C, Lane D, et al. Distinct commensal bacterial signature in the gut is associated with acute and long‐term protection from ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2020;51:1844‐1854. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Kalra L, Irshad S, Hodsoll J, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics after acute stroke for reducing pneumonia in patients with dysphagia (STROKE‐INF): a prospective, cluster‐randomised, open‐label, masked endpoint, controlled clinical trial. The Lancet. 2015;386:1835‐1844. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00126-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Westendorp WF, Vermeij J‐D, Zock E, et al. The preventive antibiotics in stroke study (PASS): a pragmatic randomised open‐label masked endpoint clinical trial. The Lancet. 2015;385:1519‐1526. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62456-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Luke MM, O'Meara ES, Rowland CM, et al. Gene variants associated with ischemic stroke: the cardiovascular health study. Stroke. 2009;40:363‐368. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Davis TP, Sanchez‐Covarubias L, Tome ME. P‐glycoprotein trafficking as a therapeutic target to optimize CNS drug delivery. Adv Pharmacol. 2014;71:25‐44. 10.1016/bs.apha.2014.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Brzica H, Abdullahi W, Ibbotson K, Ronaldson PT. Role of transporters in central nervous system drug delivery and blood‐brain barrier protection: relevance to treatment of stroke. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2017;9:117957351769380. 10.1177/1179573517693802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from Neuroprotection are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons, Ltd on behalf of Chinese Medical Association

RESOURCES