Abstract
Background
This study aimed to identify GBA1 variants in Egyptian Gaucher disease (GD) patients residing in a region with high consanguinity and to correlate these genotypes with their clinical phenotypes.
Methodology
This descriptive study included 68 Egyptian patients diagnosed with GD. Diagnosis relied upon reduced β-glucocerebrosidase activity measured by tandem mass spectrometry from dried blood spots and confirmed by GBA1 single-gene sequencing. Clinical and laboratory information were gathered from patient records, and neurological evaluations were conducted by a neurologist.
Results
Thirty patients (44.1%) were classified as type 1 GD, three (4.4%) as type 2 GD, and 35 patients (51.5%) as type 3 GD. Variant analysis of the 136 alleles identified 19 different variants. The most prevalent mutant allele was c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) (50.7%). Seven novel variants were documented: five homozygous missense variants, including c.263 C > T p.(Met88Thr), c.1331 A > G p.(Asp444Gly), c.1409 C > T p.(Ser470Phe), c.907 C > G p.(Leu303Val), c.1574G > A p.(Gly525Asp), two heterozygous missense variants: c.380 C > G p.(Ala127Gly) and c.453 + 2T > C. All carriers of these novel variants were phenotypically classified as type 1 GD. Genotype–phenotype correlations confirmed that the c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) variant was confined to type 1 GD, whereas c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) was associated with types 2 and 3 GD.
Conclusion
Variant analysis of 136 alleles identified 19 GBA1 variants, including seven novel variants. These findings enhance genotype–phenotype correlations, provide genetic counseling, and enable customized molecular analyses for families at risk.
Keywords: Gaucher disease, Genotype/phenotype, Correlation, New variants
Introduction
Gaucher disease (GD) is one of the most common autosomal recessive lysosomal storage diseases caused by variants in the acid β-glucosidase (GBA1) gene, which encodes the glucocerebrosidase enzyme [1]. Deficiency of enzymatic activity leads to progressive glucocerebrosidase accumulation, primarily in the mononuclear phagocyte system, within macrophages [2]. GD is a multisystemic disease with heterogeneous phenotypes; however, it is clinically classified into three types based on age of onset, neurological involvement, and disease progression [3]. Type 1 (non-neuronopathic) is the most common subtype and presents with early onset of symptoms, hematological involvement, hepatosplenomegaly, and skeletal manifestations. Type 2 GD (acute neuronopathic) is the most serious subtype and presents in early infancy with rapid brain deterioration. Type 3 GD (chronic neuronopathic) is a subacute form where clinical expressions start in childhood and adolescence [3, 4].
The GBA1 gene, located on chromosome 1q22, has a highly homologous pseudogene sequence. Thus, variant detection is not easy, and amplification primers are required to discriminate between the functional gene and the pseudogene. More than 721 different GBA1 gene variants have been reported in GD [5]. Numerous variants have been associated with specific clinical characteristics; however, genotype-phenotype correlation is characterized by variable expression and appearance in different individuals and ethnic groups. The most frequent variants in GD patients are c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) and c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) [6]. The most frequent variant recognized in Romanian patients is p.(Asn409Ser) [7], while c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) and c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) are common in Spain [6]. In Ashkenazi Jewish patients, the p.(Asn409Ser) variant, along with c.84dupG (84GG) and IVS2 + 1G > A, represent approximately 96% of variants, whereas in non-Jewish patients these three account for 50–60% of variants [8]. In Caucasian patients, 60–70% of variants are c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser), c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro), and c.1342G > C p.(Asp448His) [8].
Thus, c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) variant has not been associated with neurological involvement and is usually found in type 1 GD. The c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) variant is associated with neurological manifestations and typically allied with type 2 or type 3 GD, even in the heterozygous form [6, 8]. Moreover, the c.680 A > G p.(Asn227Ser) and c.1180G > T p.(Val394Leu) alleles are linked to type 3 GD, accompanied by myoclonic epilepsy [9]. This study was designed to identify variants in Egyptian GD patients living in an area of high consanguinity and correlate their genotypes with clinical characteristics.
Methodology
Patients
This descriptive study was carried out in the Hematology Unit of Assiut University Children’s Hospital in Egypt and the Genetics Department of Ain Shams University. The study involved 68 Egyptian patients with GD and was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University (approval number: 04-2023-300227). All participants signed consent forms. All recruited patients were diagnosed with GD based on reduced β-glucocerebrosidase activity and was confirmed by GBA1 genotyping.
Data collection
All enrolled patients underwent a thorough medical history assessment, including the duration of their illness and relevant family history. Clinical and laboratory information at presentation was gathered from patient records, including the age of presentation. All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical examination, including weight and height assessment, evaluation of liver and spleen size (both clinically and by ultrasound), and an ophthalmological examination. Neurological evaluations were conducted by a neurologist. GD type was categorized clinically by the treating physicians. Type 1 GD (chronic non-neuronopathic subtype) was defined by the absence of neurological symptoms throughout the disease course. Type 2 GD (acute infantile neuronopathic) and type 3 GD (chronic neuronopathic) were based on the age at which neurological signs and symptoms first manifested, and the rate of progression. Type 2 GD presents with neurological symptoms that appear within the first few months of life and progress rapidly, often resulting in severe degeneration and mortality in infancy or early childhood. Type 3 GD is typically associated with a variety of symptoms, including visceral involvement, oculomotor apraxia, and, in some instances, bulbar signs such as stridor, strabismus, feeding difficulties, epilepsy, ataxia, or dementia [10].
β-Glucosidase enzyme assay
The β-Glucosidase enzyme assay was conducted using tandem mass spectrometry on dried blood spots. Enzyme activity levels were considered reduced if below the cut-off value of 1.5 µmol/L/h.
Single-gene sequencing (GBA1 gene)
DNA was extracted from dried blood spot samples. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing were performed for all coding exons and flanking intronic regions of the GBA1 gene. The sequences were aligned to the reference sequence NM_000157.3 (ENST00000368373) at the international medical laboratory Archimed Life. Detected variants were described according to the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) recommendations for the description of sequence variants (2016 update: Hum Mutat. 2016 Jun;37(6):564-9) [11].
Results
Sixty-eight patients (45 males and 23 females) participated in this study. Patient ages ranged from 5 months to 58 years, with a median age of 21 years. The age at diagnosis ranged from 4 months to 57 years. All patients exhibited reduced or absent β-glucocerebrosidase activity, accompanied by clinical manifestations consistent with GD. The demographic data of the patients are presented in Table 1. Thirty patients (44.1%) were classified as type 1 GD, with a mean age of 8.93 ± 13.66 years. A positive family history was noted in 21 patients (70%), and 23 patients (77.3%) reported parental consanguinity. Type 2 GD was identified in three patients, all of whom unfortunately died before reaching the age of 2 years. Type 3 GD was the most prevalent form, identified in 35 patients (51.5%), with a consanguinity rate of 28 patients (80%).
Table 1.
Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data of our cohort
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | 30 (44.1) | 3 (4.4) | 35 (51.5) |
| Gender, n (%) | |||
|
Male Female |
20 (66.7) 10 (33.3) |
2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) |
23 (65.7) 12 (36.3) |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | |||
|
Mean ± SD Median (min-max) |
8.93 ± 13.66 4.35 (0.9–57) |
0.9 ± 0.1 0.9 (0.8-1) |
2.3 ± 1.8 1.85 (0.5–10.3) |
| Current age (years) | |||
|
Mean ± SD Median (min-max) |
11.11 ± 12.38 8.15 (2.3–58) |
--- --- |
6.7 ± 5.8 5.1 (1.4–17.1) |
| Presenting Manifestations | Hepatosplenomegaly, Bone involvement, Thrombocytopenia, Pancytopenia, Leucopenia, Anemia | Hepatosplenomegaly, Progressive CNs involvement in the form of strabismus, bulbar signs, spasticity refractory Epilepsy | Hepatosplenomegaly, Cytopenia, Cognitive problems, Developmental delays, Eye movement disorders, Poor coordination, Seizures |
| Positive Family history, n (%) | 21 (70.0) | 1 (33.3) | 17 (48.5) |
| Consanguinity | 23 (77.3) | 2 (66.7) | 28 (80) |
| Dead, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (100.0) | 2 (5.7) |
| Age of death (years) | & | € | |
|
--- --- |
1.6 1.8 1.4 |
12.8 8.5 |
|
| β-Glucosidase activity | |||
|
Mean (SD) Median (Range) |
0.37 ± 0.30 0.3 (0.1–1.2) |
0.23 ± 0.13 0.2 (0.1–0.5) |
0.24 ± 0.17 0.2 (0.0–0.8) |
|
Lyso-GL-1 Mean (SD) Median (Range) |
1289.26 ± 1241.24 877 (450–5504) |
1230.58 ± 763.86 994 (261–2584) |
1196.12 ± 968.18 1000 (450–5485) |
&: 3 patients died; €: 2 patients died
Pathogenic variants and types detected in the studied group
A total of 136 alleles from 68 patients across 47 independent families were analyzed. The most prevalent variant was c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro), accounting for 50.7% (n = 69) of all mutant alleles. In contrast, the c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) variant represented 7.35% (n = 10) of the identified mutant alleles. Among the identified variants, 128 (94%) were missense, 2 (1.5%) were nonsense variants, and 6 (4.4%) were recombinant alleles (Table 2).
Table 2.
Variants and allele frequencies in the studied group (68 patients, 136 alleles, from 47 independent families). All variants were described according to NM_000157.4 (GBA transcript) and NP_000148.2 (GBA protein)
| Transcript | Protein | Molecular Consequence | Classification | Allele Frequency n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c.1448T > C | p.Leu483Pro | Missense | Pathogenic | 69 (50.7) |
| c.1226 A > G | p.Asn409Ser | Missense | Pathogenic/likely pathogenic | 10 (7.35) |
| *c.263 C > T | p.Met88Thr | Missense | Pathogenic | 8 (5.88) |
| *c.1331 A > G | p.Asp444Gly | Missense | Pathogenic | 8 (5.88) |
| *c.1409 C > T | p.Ser470Phe | Missense | Pathogenic | 6 (4.4) |
| c.710 A > C | p.Lys237Thr | Missense | Pathogenic | 5 (3.67) |
| c.1604G > A | p.Arg535His | Missense | Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic | 5 (3.67) |
| c.847T > C | p.Tyr283His | Missense | Likely pathogenic | 4 (2.9) |
| 1265_1319del55+1448T > C;1483G > C;1497G > C | Recombinant allele | Pathogenic | 4 (2.9) | |
| c.1342G > C | p.Asp448His | Missense | Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic | 2 (1.47) |
| *c.907 C > G | p.Leu303Val | Missense | Pathogenic | 2 (1.47) |
| c.1193G > A | :p.Arg398Gln | Missense | Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic | 2 (1.47) |
| c.475 C > T | p.Arg159Trp | Missense | Pathogenic | 2 (1.47) |
| c.680 A > G | :p.Asn227Ser | Missense | Pathogenic | 2 (1.47) |
| *c.1574G > A | p.Gly525Asp | Missense | Pathogenic | 2 (1.47) |
| *c.380 C > G | p.Ala127Gly | Missense | Pathogenic | 1 (0.7) |
| c.754T > A | p.Phe252lle | Missense | Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic | 1 (0.7) |
| *c.453 + 2T > C | – | Splice Site | Pathogenic | 1 (0.7) |
*Novel variants
We documented seven novel variants within the cohort (Table 2). The first variant, c.263 C > T p.(Met88Thr), was a homozygous missense variant observed in four patients (5.88%) from a single family (three boys and one girl). The symptoms first appeared in the eldest sibling at the age of five years with anemia and hepatosplenomegaly. Subsequent screening of family members led to the identification of the remaining cases. The second novel variant, c.1331 A > G p.(Asp444Gly), was also a homozygous missense variant found in four patients across two families. Three patients (two boys and one girl) belonged to the same family and were diagnosed at the ages of 10, 7, and 4 years with symptoms, including hepatosplenomegaly and bleeding of varying severity. The eldest sibling suffered from severe bone pain with a history of right femur fracture (Table 1).
The third variant, c.1409 C > T p.(Ser470Phe), was a homozygous missense variant identified in three patients (4.4%) from three different families. All three patients presented with anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, and easy bruising. The fourth, c.907 C > G p.(Leu303Val), and fifth, c.1574G > A p.(Gly525Asp), variants were identified as missense variants in a single patient. The sixth, c.380 C > G, p.(Ala127Gly), was a heterozygous missense variant detected in a 2-year-old girl presenting with hepatosplenomegaly with stunted growth. The seventh, [453 + 2T > C], was a heterozygous missense variant identified in a 23-year-old female with splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia associated with heavy menstrual bleeding. All patients carrying these novel variants displayed low enzyme activity and clinical manifestations consistent with type 1 GD, as none developed neurological signs throughout the disease course (Table 3).
Table 3.
Genotype-phenotype correlation of the studied group (All variants were described according to NM_000157.4 (GBA transcript) and NP_000148.2 (GBA protein))
| No. of patients | No. of families | Allele 1 | Allele 2 | No. of Patients/Phenotype | Frequency | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Type 2 | Type 3 | |||||
| 31 | # 21 | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | - | 3 | 28 | 45.58% |
| 4 | #3 | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | 1265_1319del55+1448T > C;1483G > C;1497G > C | 4 | 5.88% | ||
| 4 | &2 | c.1226 A > G, :p.Asn409Ser | c.1226 A > G, :p.Asn409Ser | 4 | 5.88% | ||
| 4 | &1 | *c.263 C > T, p. p.Met88Thr | *c.263 C > T, p. p.Met88Thr | 4 | 5.88% | ||
| 4 | $2 | *c.1331 A > G, p. Asp444Gly | *c.1331 A > G, p. Asp444Gly | 4 | 5.88% | ||
| 3 | &3 | *c.1409 C > T, p.Ser470Phe | *c.1409 C > T, p.Ser470Phe | 3 | 4.4% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | *c.1574G > A, p.Gly525Asp | 1 | 2.9% | ||
| 2 | $2 | c.847T > C, p.Tyr283His | c.847T > C, p.Tyr283His | 2 | 2.9% | ||
| 2 | &1 | c.1604G > A, p.Arg535His | c.1604G > A, p.Arg535His | 2 | 2.9% | ||
| 2 | &1 | c.475 C > T, p.Arg159Trp | c.680 A > G, :p.Asn227Ser | 2 | 2.9% | ||
| 2 | &1 | c.710 A > C, 710 A > C, p.Lys237Thr | :c.710 A > C, p.Lys237Thr | 2 | 2.9% | ||
| 1 | 1 | c.710 A > C, p.Lys237Thr | c.475 C > T, p.Arg159Trp | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | c.1604G > A, p.Arg535His | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | 1 | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | c.1226 A > G, :p.Asn409Ser | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c.1193G > A, p.Arg398Gln | c.1193G > A, p.Arg398Gln | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | 1 | *c.907 C > G, p.Leu303Val | *c.907 C > G, :p.Leu303Val | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c.1342G > C, p.Asp448His | c.1342G > C, p.Asp448His | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c.1226 A > G, :p.Asn409Ser | *c.453 + 2T > C | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c.1448T > C, p.Leu483Pro | *c.380 C > G, p.Ala127Gly | 1 | 1.47% | ||
| 1 | &1 | c 1342G > C (p Asp448His) | c 1342G > C (p Asp448His) | 1 | 1.47% | ||
*Novel variants; &: positive consanguinity; positive consanguinity in 19 family; #: positive consanguinity in 2 family; $: positive consanguinity in one family
Phenotype /genotype correlation
Homozygous variants
Eleven homozygous GBA1 gene variants were identified among fifty-five patients (Table 3). The most prevalent variant was c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro), which was found in 31 patients (45.58%). Among these, 28 patients were phenotypically classified as type 3 GD (chronic neuronopathic) due to the late onset of neurological symptoms. The remaining three patients exhibited features of type 2 GD (acute neuronopathic), characterized by progressive central nervous system involvement, including strabismus, bulbar signs, and spasticity, leading to early mortality before two years of age (Table 1). The homozygous variant c.710 A > C p.(Lys237Thr) was detected in two patients (2.94%), both phenotypically categorized as type 3 GD. Additionally, nine different homozygous GBA1 gene variants were observed in 22 patients, all of whom showed no neurological signs throughout the disease course and were thus classified as type 1 GD (Table 3).
Compound heterozygous
Thirteen patients were found to have compound heterozygous GBA1 gene variants. The most frequently observed compound variant was c.1448T > Cp.(Leu483Pro)/1265_1319del55;1448T > C;1483G > C;1497G > C, identified in four patients who exhibited a range of symptoms, including visceral and chronic neurological involvement (type 3 GD). An additional compound heterozygous variant, c.710 A > C p.(Lys237Thr)/c.754T > A p.(Phe252lle), was identified in a single patient whose clinical manifestations were consistent with type 3 GD. The remaining eight patients were phenotypically classified as type 1 GD and carried six different compound heterozygous variants (Table 3).
Discussion
In this study, we describe the clinical characteristics and GBA1 variant spectrum of 68 patients with GD from Upper (southern) Egypt, all of whom received GD-specific enzyme replacement therapy, imiglucerase (Cerezyme®), at the hematology units of Assiut and Ain Shams University Children’s Hospitals. GD exhibits significant heterogeneity in both clinical manifestations and genetic variation, a phenomenon evident in our patient cohort. Clinically, patients exhibited a wide range of phenotypes associated with GD; 30 patients (44.1%) were classified as type 1, 3 patients (4.4%) as type 2, and 35 patients (51.5%) as type 3. Among those with the most severe manifestations, we identified patients with progressive central nervous system involvement, with fatalities occurring as early as 1.5 years of age. At the other end of the spectrum, we identified a patient with mild disease diagnosed at the age of 57 years after the detection of GD in family members. The former patient was homozygous for c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro), whereas the latter was homozygous for c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser), a variant often associated with very mild disease.
Although GD is an autosomal recessive disease, we observed a male predominance with a 2:1 ratio. This is consistent with previous Egyptian studies that reflect cultural behavior in Upper Egypt, where males receive greater medical care and attention [12]. In Upper Egypt, GD is the most diagnosed sphingolipidosis and the second most common lysosomal storage disease after mucopolysaccharidoses. It results from biallelic pathogenic variants in the GBA1 gene, located on chromosome 1q21, which comprises 11 exons [13]. More than 700 distinct GBA1 variants have been reported globally, with distribution varying significantly by population [14]. The most common variants worldwide include c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) (previously N370S); c.1448 T > C p.(Leu483Pro) (previously L444P); c.115 + 1G > A (previously IVS2 + 1G > A); and c.84dupG p.(Leu29AlafsTer18) (previously 84 GG [84-85insG]) [15].
The results of this study show that the most frequent GBA1 variant was c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) (50.7%), followed by c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) (7.35%), matching other Egyptian studies that reported the c.1448T > C variant in 50–60% of cases [16, 17]. Our findings also align with studies from Turkey, Iran, and the JAPAC region (China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, and the Philippines) [18–22]; however, some populations report lower prevalences ranging between 18.5% and 25% [7, 23, 24]. In European, American, Brazilian, Venezuelan, and Jewish populations, c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) is the most frequently reported variant [25–28]. Thus, c.1226 A > G variant prevalence declines from west to east, whereas the prevalence of the c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) variant increases in the same direction.
In our study, the pathogenic c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) variant was detected in both homozygous and compound heterozygous forms, with frequencies of 45.8% and 10.3%, respectively. In the homozygous state, this variant was associated with type 2 (3/3; 100%) and type 3 (28/35; 80%) phenotypes. Among patients with type 1 GD, c.1448T > C appeared in a heterozygous combination with c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser), c.1604G > A p.(Arg535His), and c.380 C > G p.( Ala127Gly) in 3 out of 30 cases (10%). These patients require close monitoring due to their subtle course and potential late neurological manifestations.
Genotype–phenotype correlation in GD is not absolute. In our study, several patients homozygous for c.1448T > C were initially diagnosed as type I GD based on early presentations of hepatosplenomegaly and cytopenia without neurological manifestations. However, with long-term follow-up, these patients developed supranuclear gaze palsy and cognitive impairment, prompting reclassification to type 3 GD. This occurred despite ongoing enzyme replacement therapy, which appeared to delay, but did not prevent neurological progression [17]. Conversely, some patients initially classified as type 3 based on neurological involvement were reclassified to type 2 due to rapid clinical deterioration and early mortality. Notably, survival beyond two years is atypical for classical type 2 GD. While the homozygous L444P mutation is traditionally linked to Type 3 Gaucher disease [12], our study shows that, in uncommon instances it could lead to a phenotype resembling Type 2, possibly as a result of unidentified genetic modifiers or hidden variants [29]. Additional genomic and functional investigations are necessary to clarify the mechanisms underlying this unusual severity.
Despite having the neuropathic GBA1 genotype, Egyptian patients with type 3 GD often exhibit a milder phenotype and improved outcomes with enzyme replacement therapy, suggesting potential modifying genes that enhance prognosis following treatment [30–32]. However, not all patients with neuropathic GD carry the c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) variant. In our study, we identified two known variants associated with type 3 GD. The c.710 A > C p.(Lys237Thr) variant, one of the most common variants globally, was found in two patients in the homozygous state, and in one patient in compound heterozygosity with c.754T > A p.(Phe252lle). The latter is a unique pathogenic variant in Asian populations and has been reported in three neuronopathic GD patients in Morocco [33, 34].
The second GAB1 variant identified in this study was the missense c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) variant. It was detected in four patients in the homozygous state and in two patients in the heterozygous state, all of whom were diagnosed with GD type 1 without neurological involvement. The frequency of this variant is consistent with previous Egyptian studies, which reported it in 8.7% of 195 patients (34 alleles out of 390) [12]. The c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) variant is prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews, comprising 75–80% of alleles; however, it is rare or absent in populations such as the Japanese [8, 35, 36]. This variant is considered neuroprotective, being exclusive to type 1 patients. The compound heterozygous variant c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro)/c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) was found in one patient. The two alleles are rarely found together in Egyptian cohorts, except for isolated cases reported by Khalifa et al. [17] and Fateen et al. [12]. In contrast, this genotype is more frequent in Spanish and Portuguese populations [37].
This study detected known GBA1 homozygous variants: c.847T > C p.(Tyr283His) and c.1604G > A p.(Arg535His), detected in two patients each, and c.1193G > A p.(Arg398Gln) and c.1342G > C p.(Asp448His), detected in one patient each. Additionally, c.475 C > T p.(Arg159Trp) and c.680 A > G p.(Asn227Ser) was detected in two patients as compound heterozygous variants. All these variants were detected in type 1 GD patients and were previously reported in the literature. Furthermore, our study identified two different recombinant alleles in six of our patients (4.4% of total alleles and 8.8% of patients). To date, over 20 recombinant GBA1 alleles have been identified, with RecNcil and Recdelta55 being most prevalent, either alone or in conjunction with other point variants [38, 39]. RecNcil originates from a cross-over between intron 9 and exon 10, leading to the incorporation of a C.P1 segment into the functional GBA1 gene, including the missense variants c.1448 T > C p.(L483P), c.1483G > C p.(A495P), and c.1497G > C p.(V499 V). Recdelta55 [c.1265_1319del p.(Leu422fs)] involves a 55-bp deletion in exon 9 of the GBA1 gene, corresponding to the deleted portion of the pseudogene [40]. Recombinant alleles that include the 55-bp deletion in exon 9 were reported with other point variants or with RecNcil [41, 42].
In our study, the recombinant variant RecNcil (c.1574G > A/RecNcil) was identified in a compound heterozygous state in two patients with type 1 GD. Interestingly, a complex and rare variant resulting from the recombination of Rec1263del55 and RecNcil alleles was identified in four patients (5.88%) with type 3 GD in a compound heterozygous form with c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) [40]. Nevertheless, these patients exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity. The frequency of recombinant alleles (Rec) in our study was lower than previously reported rates, which include 38.1% in Egyptian patients with type 1 GD [16], and 9.5–21% reported in other international studies [23, 43].
Our study identified known GBA1 variants such as c.847T > C p.(Tyr283His), c.1604G > A p.(Arg535His), each in two patients, and c.1193G > A p.(Arg398Gln), c 1342G > C (p Asp448Hs); each in one patient, all were homozygous. Additionally, c.475 C > T p.(Arg159Trp) and c.680 A > G p.(Asn227Ser) were identified in two patients as compound heterozygous variants. All variants were identified in type 1 GD patients, as previously documented in the literature. In addition, our study revealed seven novel variants in 22% of our cohort: c.263 C > T p.(Met88Thr) and c.1331 A > G p.(Asp444Gly) each in four homozygous patients; c.1409 C > T p.(Ser470Phe) in three patients; and c.907 C > G p.(Leu303Val) in one patient, all in homozygous form. The remaining variants, c.1574G > A p.(Gly525Asp) and c.380 C > G p.(Ala127Gly), were each found in one patient as compound heterozygous variants along with the other known variants. All patients carrying these novel variants exhibited reduced enzyme levels and clinical symptoms characteristic of type 1 GD, without neurological signs during disease progression. None of these variants have been previously reported in PubMed or publicly available databases such as ClinVar, HGMD, or dbSNP.
In addition, a splice-site variant, c.453 + 2T > C in intron 4, was identified and located within the intronic regions. Although its exact protein has not been determined, it may be disease-related due to a splicing alteration. This variant was detected in a 22-year-old female patient with type 1 GD, in heterozygosity with c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser). We found a high rate of consanguinity (77.9%) in our cohort, resulting in the high frequency of homozygous variants (80%). The Middle East, particularly Upper Egypt, has some of the world’s highest consanguinity rates (21–33%), contributing to elevated homozygosity even among non-related couples in rural communities due to the long-standing national traditions [44].
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study presents the findings of 68 patients with GD from Upper Egypt, covering the entire spectrum of disease phenotypes. Analysis of the 136 mutant alleles identified 19 different variants (including 7 novel variants) and 19 genotypes. The c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) variant was the most prevalent (50.7%), with the homozygous form representing the most common genotype (45.5%). Genotype–phenotype correlations confirmed that the c.1226 A > G p.(Asn409Ser) variant is not associated with the development of neurological complications, whereas the c.1448T > C p.(Leu483Pro) variant was strongly linked to severe neuronopathic phenotypes (types 2 and 3 GD). The distribution of mutant alleles and the frequency of specific genotypes exhibit distinct characteristics that may reflect the ethnic features of our community. Identifying these variants expands the understanding of the global GBA1 variant landscape, provides insights into the disease’s molecular basis, establishes genotype–phenotype correlations, supports genetic counseling, and performs customized molecular analyses for families at risk.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to the General Administration for Reducing Genetic Diseases and Disabilities, Ministry of Health, for supplying ERT in centers of excellence for Gaucher disease in Egyptian universities, which greatly contributed to our research. We thank the international medical laboratory Archimed Life for conducting the β-Glucosidase enzyme assay and GAB1 gene sequencing for all patients enrolled in this study.
Abbreviations
- CNS
Central Nervous System
- GD
Gaucher Disease
- GBA1
Glucosylceramidase Beta 1
- HGMD
Human Gene Mutation Database
- HGVS
Human Genome Variation Society
- PCR
Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Rec
Recombinant Allele
- RecNcil
Recombinant NciI
Author contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the publication, including input into the conception, study design, execution, data collection and/or analysis, and interpretation; participated in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the manuscript; agreed on the journal to which it has been submitted and approved the final submitted version; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funding was received.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethical Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki 1964. The study was approved by Assiut University’s Ethical Committee for Clinical Research (approval number: 04-2023-300227). Signed statements of informed consent to participation and publication were obtained from the guardians of trial participants before the study. The consent requirement was waived for retrospective participants by the above-named ethics committee.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest to declare.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Stirnemann J, Vigan M, Hamroun D et al (2012) The French gaucher’s disease registry: clinical characteristics, complications and treatment of 562 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:77. 10.1186/1750-1172-7-77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beutler E, Nguyen NJ, Henneberger MW et al (1993) Gaucher disease: gene frequencies in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Am J Hum Genet 52:85–88 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kinghorn KJ, Grönke S, Castillo-Quan JI et al (2016) A drosophila model of neuronopathic gaucher disease demonstrates lysosomal-autophagic defects and altered mTOR signalling and is functionally rescued by Rapamycin. J Neurosci 36:11654–11670. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4527-15.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beutler E, Grabowski GA (2001) Gaucher disease. In Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, and Valle D, Eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. Vol. III New York, McGraw-Hill, 3635–3668. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=749935. Accessed 17 Jun 2025
- 5.Tsuji S, Choudary PV, Martin BM et al (1987) A mutation in the human glucocerebrosidase gene in neuronopathic gaucher’s disease. N Engl J Med 316:570–575. 10.1056/NEJM198703053161002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gegg ME, Schapira AHV (2018) The role of glucocerebrosidase in Parkinson disease pathogenesis. FEBS J 285:3591–3603. 10.1111/FEBS.14393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Drugan C, Procopciuc L, Jebeleanu G et al (2002) Gaucher disease in Romanian patients: incidence of the most common mutations and phenotypic manifestations. Eur J Hum Genet 10:511–515. 10.1038/SJ.EJHG.5200845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stirnemann JÔ, Belmatoug N, Camou F et al (2017) A review of gaucher disease pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatments. Int J Mol Sci 18. 10.3390/IJMS18020441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Cindik N, Ozcay F, S̈uren D et al (2010) Gaucher disease with communicating hydrocephalus and cardiac involvement. Clin Cardiol 33. 10.1002/CLC.20348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Weiss K, Gonzalez AN, Lopez G et al (2015) The clinical management of type 2 gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab 114:110–122. 10.1016/J.YMGME.2014.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR et al (2016) HGVS recommendations for the description of sequence variants: 2016 update. Hum Mutat 37:564–569. 10.1002/HUMU.22981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fateen EM, Fathy HM, Abd El-Fattah AI et al (2020) Beta-glucocerebrosidase gene mutation in a sample of Egyptian patients with gaucher disease. Middle East J Med Genet 8. 10.4103/MXE.MXE_22_19
- 13.Horowitz M, Wilder S, Horowitz Z et al (1989) The human glucocerebrosidase gene and pseudogene: structure and evolution. Genomics 4:87–96. 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90319-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dimitriou E, Moraitou M, Cozar M et al (2020) Gaucher disease: biochemical and molecular findings in 141 patients diagnosed in Greece. Mol Genet Metab Rep 24:100614. 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2020.100614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sheth J, Bhavsar R, Mistri M et al (2019) Gaucher disease: single gene molecular characterization of one-hundred Indian patients reveals novel variants and the most prevalent mutation. BMC Med Genet 20:31. 10.1186/s12881-019-0759-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.El-Morsy Z, Khashaba MT, Soliman OE-S et al (2011) Glucosidase acid beta gene mutations in Egyptian children with gaucher disease and relation to disease phenotypes. World J Pediatr 7:326–330. 10.1007/s12519-011-0309-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khalifa AS, Tantawy AA, Shawky RM et al (2011) Outcome of enzyme replacement therapy in children with gaucher disease: the Egyptian experience. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 12:9–14. 10.1016/j.ejmhg.2011.02.008 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Feng Y, Huang Y, Tang C et al (2018) Clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with gaucher disease in Southern China. Blood Cells Mol Dis 68:30–34. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jeong S-Y, Park S-J, Kim HJ (2011) Clinical and genetic characteristics of Korean patients with gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 46:11–14. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2010.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ankleshwaria C, Mistri M, Bavdekar A et al (2014) Novel mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene of Indian patients with gaucher disease. J Hum Genet 59:223–228. 10.1038/jhg.2014.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mozafari H, Tghikhani M, Rahimi Z et al (2021) Analysis of glucocerebrosidase (GBA) gene mutations in Iranian patients with gaucher disease. Iran J Child Neurol 15:139–151. 10.22037/IJCN.V15I4.23834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gumus E, Karhan AN, Hizarcioglu-Gulsen H et al (2021) Clinical-genetic characteristics and treatment outcomes of Turkish children with gaucher disease type 1 and type 3: A sixteen-year single-center experience. Eur J Med Genet 64:104339. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Giraldo P, Pocoví M, Pérez-Calvo J et al (2000) Report of the Spanish gaucher’s disease registry: clinical and genetic characteristics. Haematologica 85:792–799 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hatton CE, Cooper A, Whitehouse C, Wraith JE (1997) Mutation analysis in 46 British and Irish patients with gaucher’s disease. Arch Dis Child 77:17–22. 10.1136/adc.77.1.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mattošová S, Chandoga J, Hlavatá A et al (2015) Spectrum of GBA mutations in patients with gaucher disease from slovakia: identification of five novel mutations. Isr Med Assoc J 17:166–170 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gómez G, Arias S, Cárdenas L et al (2017) GBA mutations in gaucher type I Venezuelan patients: ethnic origins and frequencies. J Genet 96:583–589. 10.1007/s12041-017-0821-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rozenberg R, Fox DC, Sobreira E, Pereira LV (2006) Detection of 12 new mutations in gaucher disease Brazilian patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis 37:204–209. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2006.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Orenstein M, Barbouth D, Bodamer OA, Weinreb NJ (2014) Patients with type 1 gaucher disease in South florida, USA: demographics, genotypes, disease severity and treatment outcomes. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9:45. 10.1186/1750-1172-9-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Regier DS, Tifft CJ (2013) updated 2023). GLB1-related disorders. In M. P. Adam, H. H. Ardinger, R. A. Pagon, S. E. Wallace, L. J. H. Bean, K. W. Gripp, G. M. Mirzaa, & A. Amemiya (Eds.), GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK164500/ [PubMed]
- 30.El-Beshlawy A, Abdel-Azim K, Abdel-Salam A et al (2023) Egyptian gaucher disease type 3 patients: a large cohort study spanning two decades. J Rare Dis 2:7. 10.1007/s44162-023-00011-0 [Google Scholar]
- 31.El-Beshlawy A, Abdel-Azim K, Abdel-Salam A et al (2022) Clinical characteristics, molecular background, and survival of Egyptian patients with gaucher disease over a 20-Year Follow-up. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 44:243–248. 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.El-Beshlawy A, Tantawy AAG, Shawky RM et al (2024) Diagnosis and management of patients with gaucher disease: an Egyptian expert opinion. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 25:88. 10.1186/s43042-024-00552-z [Google Scholar]
- 33.Feng S, Rcheulishvili N, Jiang X et al (2024) A review on gaucher disease: therapeutic potential of β-glucocerebrosidase-targeted mRNA/saRNA approach. Int J Biol Sci 20:2111–2129. 10.7150/ijbs.87741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zouiri G, Rhouda H, Kriouile Y (2024) c.754T>A homozygous mutation described for the first time in three Moroccan patients with gaucher disease. Archives De Pédiatrie 31:277–278. 10.1016/j.arcped.2023.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ida H, Rennert OM, Kawame H et al (1997) Mutation prevalence among 47 unrelated Japanese patients with gaucher disease: identification of four novel mutations. J Inherit Metab Dis 20:67–73. 10.1023/A:1005313724361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Horowitz M, Tzuri G, Eyal N et al (1993) Prevalence of nine mutations among Jewish and non-Jewish gaucher disease patients. Am J Hum Genet 53:921–930 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Giraldo P, Alfonso P, Irún P et al (2012) Mapping the genetic and clinical characteristics of gaucher disease in the Iberian Peninsula. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:17. 10.1186/1750-1172-7-17MististryMistryMi [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Torralba MA, Alfonso P, Pérez-Calvo JI, et al (2002) High Prevalence of the 55-bp Deletion (c.1263del55) in Exon 9 of the Glucocerebrosidase Gene Causing Misdiagnosis(for Homozygous N370S (c.1226A >G) Mutation) in Spanish Gaucher Disease Patients.Blood Cells Mol Dis 29:35–40. 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0535 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Hruska KS, LaMarca ME, Scott CR, Sidransky E (2008) Gaucher disease: mutation and polymorphism spectrum in the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA). Hum Mutat 29:567–583. 10.1002/humu.20676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Beutler E, Gelbart T, West C (1993) Identification of six new gaucher disease mutations. Genomics 15:203–205. 10.1006/geno.1993.1035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sarria AJ, Giraldo, Perez-Calvo JI, Pocové M (1999) Detection of three rare (G377S, T134P and 1451delAC), and two novel mutations(G195W and Rec[1263del55;1342G>C] in Spanish gaucher disease patients. Hum Mutat 14:88–88. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)14:1%3C88::AID-HUMU16%3E3.0.CO;2-E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Amaral O, Pinto E, Fortuna M et al (1996) Type 1 gaucher disease: identification of N396T and prevalence of glucocerebrosidase mutations in the Portuguese. Hum Mutat 8:280–281. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1996)8:3%3C280::AID-HUMU15%3E3.0.CO;2-Z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cormand B, Harboe TL, Gort L et al (1998) Mutation analysis of gaucher disease patients from argentina: high prevalence of the RecNciI mutation. Am J Med Genet 80:343–351. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981204)80:4%3C343::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-W [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Elmonem MA, Mahmoud IG, Mehaney DA et al (2016) Lysosomal storage disorders in Egyptian children. Indian J Pediatr 83:805–813. 10.1007/s12098-015-2014-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
