Abstract
Background
This study aims to estimate the average life expectancy of the Tokugawa Shogun family by analyzing historical documents. The data is also compared to modern Japanese life expectancy figures.
Methods
The lifespan of members of the Tokugawa Shogun family is estimated based on data from Edo-period documents. We assess survival rates by age, sex, and other factors. Lunar calendar dates are converted into solar calendar dates, and birth years are counted as age 0 to ensure that the estimated life expectancy is comparable to modern Japanese estimates, free from bias.
Results
The mean life expectancy at birth for males in the Tokugawa Shogun family is 20.93±25.03 years, and for females, it is 20.53±25.16 years. The pooled result for both sexes is 20.75±25.00 years.
Conclusions
The life expectancy of the Tokugawa Shogun family is lower than that of modern Japanese, despite their status as the supreme elite class in Edo-period Japan. This reduced life expectancy is primarily attributed to high infant mortality rates, though survival rates for individuals aged 10 and above remained relatively consistent.
Keywords: Life expectancy, Japan, Tokugawa-Shogun family, History, Demography
INTRODUCTION
The goal of geriatrics is to promote a long, healthy life. In studying the lives and diseases of old population, it is crucial to examine the historical changes in lifespan (or life expectancy [LE]). The analysis of historical life expectancy has been reviewed by numerous scholars in the fields of geriatrics and gerontology.1) Demographic studies of the past are essential for understanding the lives and diseases of ancient populations,2) and average LE over time has been reported by several scholars in paleodemography.3-6)
For decades, bioanthropologists in Japan have also calculated LE using archaeological human remains.7-11) However, a significant limitation of studies based on skeletal specimens is the potential for severe bias, often due to the degradation of bones in the soil over time.12)
As a result, paleodemographic researchers have increasingly turned to historical resources. In Japan, studies on the average LE during the Tokugawa Shogunate period have been conducted by Hayami,13) Nakajima,14) Narimatsu,15) and others, using Edo-period documents such as the Shumon-Ninbetsu-Aratame-chō (宗門人別改帳; The Village People Register of Religious Faith and Relationship), etc. However, these documents mainly focus on commoners and exclude important data on samurai and other upper-class individuals. Additionally, they lack reliable information on infant mortality and other key demographic factors.
In this context, our study of documents related to the Tokugawa Shogun family—who were the highest ruling class during the Edo period—holds significant value. These documents are far more accurate than other sources and provide comprehensive data on the lifespan of Shogun family members, including detailed records of infant births and deaths.
Despite their invaluable demographic potential, these documents have yet to be properly analyzed. The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to calculate the average LE of Tokugawa Shogun family members based on historical documents, (2) to estimate the paleodemographic patterns of the Edo period using survival curves and rates, and (3) to establish a foundation for applying the results of this study to other demographic data from the Edo period or contemporary Japan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tokugawa shoguns were the de facto head of government and the highest authority in the Edo period, although the emperor's family nominally ranked higher. In this study, we used multiple documents about Tokugawa Shogun family: Tokugawa Jikki (徳川実紀), Shoku-Tokugawa Jikki (続徳川実紀), Tokugawa Bakufu Keifu (徳川幕府系譜), Tokugawa-Bakufu Shoke Keifu (徳川幕府諸家系譜).16) These are top-rated data of Edo period that recorded the birth and death dates of the Shogun Family members. Table 1 summarizes the data of Shogun family members numbered a total of 151 individuals (83 males and 68 females). In our study, the names of individuals are removed from the data set for ethical issues to personal information.
Table 1.
Materials used in this study
| ID | Sex | Birth day | Death day | Age at death | Generation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | June 27, 1560 | July 1,1625 | 65 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | Second Half of September, 1565 | March 3, 1615 | 49 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | March 1, 1574 | June 2, 1607 | 33 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | May 2, 1579 | March 14, 1632 | 52 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | October 18, 1580 | April 1, 1607 | 26 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | November 21, 1580 | August 2, 1617 | 36 | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | October 28, 1583 | October 25, 1603 | 19 | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | February 16, 1592 | August 24, 1683 | 91 | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | August 16, 1594 | February 7, 1599 | 4 | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | April 16, 1602 | April 20, 1600 | 4 | 1 |
| 11 | 2 | March 25, 1595 | March 6, 1598 | 3 | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | January 2, 1601 | June 5, 1650 | 49 | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | April 28, 1602 | February 19, 1671 | 68 | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | September 15, 1603 | August 23, 1661 | 57 | 1 |
| 15 | 2 | January 28, 1607 | March 7, 1610 | 3 | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | May 26, 1597 | March 11, 1666 | 68 | 2 |
| 17 | 2 | May 9, 1599 | August 9, 1622 | 23 | 2 |
| 18 | 2 | June 12, 1601 | March 20, 1672 | 70 | 2 |
| 19 | 1 | July 30, 1601 | November 8, 1602 | 1 | 2 |
| 20 | 2 | August 25, 1602 | April 16, 1630 | 27 | 2 |
| 21 | 1 | August 12, 1604 | June 8, 1651 | 46 | 2 |
| 22 | 1 | June 17, 1611 | February 4, 1973 | 62 | 2 |
| 23 | 2 | November 23, 1607 | August 2, 1678 | 70 | 2 |
| 24 | 2 | April 29, 1637 | January 10, 1699 | 62 | 3 |
| 25 | 1 | September 7, 1641 | June 4, 1680 | 38 | 3 |
| 26 | 1 | March 26, 1645 | September 6, 1647 | 2 | 3 |
| 27 | 1 | June 28, 1644 | November 8, 1678 | 34 | 3 |
| 28 | 1 | February 23, 1648 | February 19, 1709 | 62 | 3 |
| 29 | 1 | February 3, 1648 | August 22, 1648 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1 | June 11, 1662 | November 12, 1712 | 50 | 5 |
| 31 | 2 | May 20, 1676 | April 15, 1704 | 27 | 5 |
| 32 | 1 | June 14, 1679 | July 22, 1683 | 4 | 5 |
| 33 | 2 | October 7, 1681 | November 20, 1682 | 1 | 6 |
| 34 | 1 | October 10, 1699 | October 10, 1699 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 1 | August 7, 1707 | October 23, 1707 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1 | February 1, 1709 | September 5, 1710 | 1 | 6 |
| 37 | 1 | August 8, 1709 | June 19, 1716 | 6 | 6 |
| 38 | 1 | October 8, 1711 | November 15, 1711 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | 1 | January 28, 1712 | July 12, 1761 | 49 | 8 |
| 40 | 1 | December 22, 1715 | July 15, 1771 | 56 | 8 |
| 41 | 1 | May 3, 1719 | June 23, 1719 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | 1 | September 7, 1721 | January 13, 1765 | 43 | 8 |
| 43 | 2 | October 26, 1721 | December 13, 1722 | 1 | 8 |
| 44 | 1 | June 20, 1737 | September 29, 1786 | 49 | 9 |
| 45 | 1 | March 17, 1745 | August 22, 1795 | 50 | 9 |
| 46 | 2 | August 16, 1756 | May 29, 1757 | 0 | 10 |
| 47 | 2 | August 30, 1761 | March 12, 1773 | 11 | 10 |
| 48 | 1 | December 10, 1762 | April 10, 1779 | 16 | 10 |
| 49 | 1 | February 1, 1763 | April 28, 1763 | 0 | 10 |
| 50 | 1 | April 26, 1796 | June 10, 1799 | 3 | 11 |
| 51 | 2 | April 20, 1789 | July 13, 1817 | 28 | 11 |
| 52 | 2 | November 7, 1790 | November 8, 1790 | 0 | 11 |
| 53 | 1 | August 30, 1792 | July 31, 1793 | 0 | 11 |
| 54 | 2 | August 13, 1796 | May 13, 1798 | 1 | 11 |
| 55 | 1 | June 22, 1793 | August 26, 1853 | 60 | 11 |
| 56 | 1 | June 6, 1794 | June 6, 1794 | 0 | 11 |
| 57 | 1 | January 19, 1796 | April 8, 1797 | 1 | 11 |
| 58 | 1 | April 13, 1798 | September 4, 1798 | 0 | 11 |
| 59 | 2 | January 10, 1800 | May 26, 1800 | 0 | 11 |
| 60 | 2 | June 6, 1802 | April 25, 1803 | 0 | 11 |
| 61 | 2 | November 14, 1796 | May 20, 1797 | 0 | 11 |
| 62 | 2 | September 14, 1798 | July 26, 1799 | 0 | 11 |
| 63 | 2 | May 27, 1800 | August 30, 1853 | 53 | 11 |
| 64 | 1 | October 16, 1801 | July 1, 1846 | 44 | 11 |
| 65 | 2 | November 28, 1803 | July 30, 1804 | 0 | 11 |
| 66 | 2 | January 23, 1806 | June 17, 1807 | 1 | 11 |
| 67 | 2 | June 3, 1801 | July 3, 1802 | 1 | 11 |
| 68 | 1 | September 16, 1803 | November 4, 1805 | 1 | 11 |
| 69 | 1 | March 30, 1806 | October 29, 1810 | 4 | 11 |
| 70 | 1 | April 6, 1809 | June 29, 1813 | 4 | 11 |
| 71 | 1 | July 14, 1810 | August 23, 1845 | 35 | 11 |
| 72 | 2 | February 14, 1813 | September 6, 1830 | 17 | 11 |
| 73 | 1 | September 17, 1815 | November 24, 1817 | 2 | 11 |
| 74 | 2 | January 22, 1804 | June 10, 1857 | 53 | 11 |
| 75 | 2 | April 19, 1806 | September 5, 1806 | 0 | 11 |
| 76 | 2 | September 1, 1808 | September 18, 1821 | 13 | 11 |
| 77 | 2 | December 12, 1807 | September 14, 1811 | 3 | 11 |
| 78 | 2 | August 20, 1809 | April 20, 1837 | 27 | 11 |
| 79 | 2 | February 15, 1811 | August 18, 1811 | 0 | 11 |
| 80 | 2 | February 23, 1813 | September 4, 1814 | 1 | 11 |
| 81 | 1 | June 18, 1818 | May 5, 1821 | 2 | 11 |
| 82 | 1 | June 8, 1820 | April 19, 1849 | 28 | 11 |
| 83 | 1 | September 19, 1822 | April 8, 1823 | 0 | 11 |
| 84 | 1 | January 10, 1810 | July 3, 1827 | 17 | 11 |
| 85 | 2 | May 4, 1811 | April 24, 1847 | 35 | 11 |
| 86 | 1 | May 14, 1812 | April 20, 1826 | 13 | 11 |
| 87 | 1 | September 12, 1814 | March 23, 1891 | 76 | 11 |
| 88 | 1 | March 7, 1817 | July 27, 1817 | 0 | 11 |
| 89 | 2 | August 9, 1818 | February 5, 1869 | 50 | 11 |
| 90 | 1 | December 11, 1819 | August 1, 1839 | 19 | 11 |
| 91 | 1 | October 14, 1821 | January 30, 1868 | 46 | 11 |
| 92 | 2 | April 27, 1813 | June 20, 1868 | 55 | 11 |
| 93 | 2 | November 17, 1815 | July 7, 1817 | 1 | 11 |
| 94 | 2 | October 28, 1817 | December 1, 1872 | 55 | 11 |
| 95 | 1 | October 25, 1813 | May 23, 1814 | 0 | 11 |
| 96 | 2 | August 1, 1815 | February 8, 1816 | 0 | 11 |
| 97 | 2 | February 8, 1819 | September 23, 1875 | 56 | 11 |
| 98 | 1 | October 30, 1820 | October 16, 1838 | 17 | 11 |
| 99 | 1 | March 10, 1823 | July 4, 1841 | 18 | 11 |
| 100 | 1 | April 26, 1825 | June 17, 1844 | 19 | 11 |
| 101 | 1 | July 20, 1819 | May 9, 1839 | 19 | 11 |
| 102 | 2 | November 20, 1827 | February 2, 1843 | 15 | 11 |
| 103 | 1 | November 22, 1813 | October 9, 1814 | 0 | 12 |
| 104 | 2 | March 27, 1815 | March 28, 1815 | 0 | 12 |
| 105 | 2 | December 11, 1816 | December 14, 1816 | 0 | 12 |
| 106 | 2 | November 5, 1814 | January 19, 1819 | 4 | 12 |
| 107 | 1 | September 12, 1819 | May 1, 1820 | 0 | 12 |
| 108 | 1 | May 1, 1825 | July 10, 1838 | 13 | 12 |
| 109 | 1 | July 11, 1822 | July 15, 1822 | 0 | 12 |
| 110 | 2 | February 18, 1826 | August 19, 1826 | 0 | 12 |
| 111 | 1 | May 6, 1824 | September 14, 1858 | 34 | 12 |
| 112 | 1 | March 17, 1826 | November 15, 1827 | 1 | 12 |
| 113 | 1 | October 18, 1828 | April 27, 1829 | 0 | 12 |
| 114 | 2 | May 21, 1824 | April 8, 1829 | 4 | 12 |
| 115 | 2 | June 24, 1826 | June 7, 1840 | 13 | 12 |
| 116 | 1 | July 25, 1829 | August 25, 1830 | 1 | 12 |
| 117 | 1 | April 5, 1832 | January 15, 1834 | 1 | 12 |
| 118 | 2 | August 8, 1835 | July 29, 1836 | 0 | 12 |
| 119 | 1 | July 15, 1838 | July 4, 1839 | 0 | 12 |
| 120 | 2 | July 11, 1842 | June 28, 1843 | 0 | 12 |
| 121 | 2 | September 13, 1833 | August 11, 1834 | 0 | 12 |
| 122 | 2 | May 8, 1836 | September 14, 1837 | 1 | 12 |
| 123 | 2 | November 2, 1839 | June 22, 1840 | 0 | 12 |
| 124 | 1 | October 7, 1843 | October 7, 1843 | 0 | 12 |
| 125 | 2 | October 9, 1844 | August 9, 1845 | 0 | 12 |
| 126 | 1 | January 4, 1846 | September 20, 1846 | 0 | 12 |
| 127 | 2 | March 8, 1848 | October 24, 1848 | 0 | 12 |
| 128 | 1 | October 13, 1852 | September 18, 1853 | 0 | 12 |
| 129 | 1 | November 10, 1849 | November 11, 1849 | 0 | 12 |
| 130 | 2 | August 28, 1858 | August 28, 1858 | 0 | 15 |
| 131 | 1 | August 15, 1871 | June 27, 1872 | 0 | 15 |
| 132 | 2 | June 2, 1873 | September 29, 1893 | 20 | 15 |
| 133 | 2 | October 27, 1875 | December, 10 1921 | 46 | 15 |
| 134 | 1 | August 28, 1877 | January 1, 1948 | 70 | 15 |
| 135 | 1 | August 17, 1878 | November 28, 1878 | 0 | 15 |
| 136 | 2 | August 24, 1880 | September 29, 1880 | 0 | 15 |
| 137 | 2 | September 23, 1882 | August 18, 1939 | 56 | 15 |
| 138 | 1 | September 2, 1884 | January 22, 1922 | 37 | 15 |
| 139 | 2 | March 22, 1887 | July 5, 1924 | 37 | 15 |
| 140 | 1 | August 23, 1888 | July 17, 1932 | 43 | 15 |
| 141 | 1 | October 21, 1871 | April 17, 1872 | 0 | 15 |
| 142 | 1 | November 5, 1872 | July 5, 1873 | 0 | 15 |
| 143 | 1 | February 21, 1874 | June 12, 1930 | 56 | 15 |
| 144 | 2 | April 3, 1875 | July 22, 1875 | 0 | 15 |
| 145 | 2 | July 14, 1876 | November 30, 1907 | 31 | 15 |
| 146 | 2 | August 17, 1878 | October 8, 1978 | 0 | 15 |
| 147 | 2 | September 17, 1880 | January 13, 1954 | 73 | 15 |
| 148 | 2 | January 23, 1882 | September 11, 1942 | 60 | 15 |
| 149 | 2 | September 18, 1883 | October 11,1953 | 70 | 15 |
| 150 | 1 | September 22, 1885 | July 2, 1886 | 0 | 15 |
| 151 | 1 | October 30, 1887 | November 11, 1968 | 81 | 15 |
Since the date system used during the Tokugawa Shogunate period was based on the lunar calendar until the Meiji Restoration, we converted the dates in historical records to the solar calendar for a demographic comparison with modern populations. For this conversion, we utilized the Japanese calendar date database from the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (https://eco.mtk.nao.ac.jp/cgi-bin/koyomi/caldb.cgi). Our study is pioneering in that it is the first to convert the birth and death dates from the lunar to the solar calendar, a step that has not been undertaken in previous paleodemographic studies of Edo period populations. LE was then calculated by sex, and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, we evaluated the months of birth and death.
RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the name, sex, date of birth, date of death, and age at death for members of the Tokugawa Shogun family. The mean LE at birth for males is 20.93±25.03 years, and for females, it is 20.53±25.16 years. The sex-pooled mean LE at birth is 20.75±25.00 years (Table 2). A t-test revealed no significant difference in LE at birth between males and females (p=0.9228).
Table 2.
Average age at death on the Tokugawa Shogun family
| Male | Female | Sex-pooled | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of individuals | 83 | 68 | 151 |
| Minimum value | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum value | 91 | 73 | 91 |
| Class width | 13 | 10.4 | 11.4 |
| Average age at death | 20.9277 | 20.5294 | 20.7483 |
| Standard deviation | 25.0257 | 25.1595 | 25.0030 |
| level of significance | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Survival rates and survival curves, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, are presented in Table 3 and Fig. 1, respectively. These analyses reveal that approximately 30% of individuals died at age 0, and nearly 50% had died by age 3. This is visually represented by the age-at-death distributions in Fig. 2A and 2B. Our estimates of LE for Tokugawa Shogun children (n=102) at age 1 are 30.71±24.88 years (30.47±24.92 years for males, 31.02±25.12 years for females), and at age 2 (n=87), the LE is 35.83±23.38 years (34.6±23.8 years for males, 37.51±22.97 years for females). The LE at age 2 closely aligns with the findings of Hayami.17) Fig. 3A and 3B depict the months of birth and death for the Tokugawa Shogun family, respectively, showing a lower mortality rate in winter and a higher rate in summer.
Table 3.
Survival rate at age in males and females of children of Tokugawa Shogun family
| Male |
Female |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at death | Survival probability (%) | Age at death | Survival probability (%) |
| 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| 0 | 68.6746988 | 0 | 66.17647059 |
| 1 | 68.6746988 | 1 | 66.17647059 |
| 1 | 60.24096386 | 1 | 54.41176471 |
| 2 | 60.24096386 | 3 | 54.41176471 |
| 2 | 56.62650602 | 3 | 50 |
| 3 | 56.62650602 | 4 | 50 |
| 3 | 55.42168675 | 4 | 47.05882353 |
| 4 | 55.42168675 | 11 | 47.05882353 |
| 4 | 49.39759036 | 11 | 45.58823529 |
| 6 | 49.39759036 | 13 | 45.58823529 |
| 6 | 48.19277108 | 13 | 42.64705882 |
| 13 | 48.19277108 | 15 | 42.64705882 |
| 13 | 45.78313253 | 15 | 41.17647059 |
| 16 | 45.78313253 | 17 | 41.17647059 |
| 16 | 44.57831325 | 17 | 39.70588235 |
| 17 | 44.57831325 | 20 | 39.70588235 |
| 17 | 42.1686747 | 20 | 38.23529412 |
| 18 | 42.1686747 | 23 | 38.23529412 |
| 18 | 40.96385542 | 23 | 36.76470588 |
| 19 | 40.96385542 | 27 | 36.76470588 |
| 19 | 36.14457831 | 27 | 32.35294118 |
| 26 | 36.14457831 | 28 | 32.35294118 |
| 26 | 34.93975904 | 28 | 30.88235294 |
| 28 | 34.93975904 | 31 | 30.88235294 |
| 28 | 33.73493976 | 31 | 29.41176471 |
| 33 | 33.73493976 | 35 | 29.41176471 |
| 33 | 32.53012048 | 35 | 27.94117647 |
| 34 | 32.53012048 | 36 | 27.94117647 |
| 34 | 30.12048193 | 36 | 26.47058824 |
| 35 | 30.12048193 | 37 | 26.47058824 |
| 35 | 28.91566265 | 37 | 25 |
| 37 | 28.91566265 | 46 | 25 |
| 37 | 27.71084337 | 46 | 23.52941176 |
| 38 | 27.71084337 | 49 | 23.52941176 |
| 38 | 26.5060241 | 49 | 22.05882353 |
| 43 | 26.5060241 | 50 | 22.05882353 |
| 43 | 24.09638554 | 50 | 20.58823529 |
| 44 | 24.09638554 | 53 | 20.58823529 |
| 44 | 22.89156627 | 53 | 17.64705882 |
| 46 | 22.89156627 | 55 | 17.64705882 |
| 46 | 20.48192771 | 55 | 14.70588235 |
| 49 | 20.48192771 | 56 | 14.70588235 |
| 49 | 16.86746988 | 56 | 11.76470588 |
| 50 | 16.86746988 | 60 | 11.76470588 |
| 50 | 14.45783133 | 60 | 10.29411765 |
| 52 | 14.45783133 | 62 | 10.29411765 |
| 52 | 13.25301205 | 62 | 8.823529412 |
| 56 | 13.25301205 | 65 | 8.823529412 |
| 56 | 10.84337349 | 65 | 7.352941176 |
| 57 | 10.84337349 | 68 | 7.352941176 |
| 57 | 9.638554217 | 68 | 5.882352941 |
| 60 | 9.638554217 | 70 | 5.882352941 |
| 60 | 8.43373494 | 70 | 1.470588235 |
| 62 | 8.43373494 | 73 | 1.470588235 |
| 62 | 6.024096386 | 73 | 0 |
| 68 | 6.024096386 | - | - |
| 68 | 4.819277108 | - | - |
| 70 | 4.819277108 | - | - |
| 70 | 3.614457831 | - | - |
| 76 | 3.614457831 | - | - |
| 76 | 2.409638554 | - | - |
| 81 | 2.409638554 | - | - |
| 81 | 1.204819277 | - | - |
| 91 | 1.204819277 | - | - |
| 91 | 0 | - | - |
Two equal ages indicate when that age was just reached and when it was the last of that age. Thus, the difference indicates a decrease in survival rate at that age.
Fig. 1.

Survival curves of Tokugawa Shogun children, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Fig. 2.

Plot of age at death for (A) females and (B) males in the Tokugawa Shogun family.
Fig. 3.

(A) Birth month and (B) death month of the Tokugawa Shogun family.
DISCUSSION
Previous Reports on Edo People’s LE
To date, there have been several reports on the LE of Japanese populations prior to the 20th century, covering various groups. In summary, Kobayashi18) estimated the LE for males and females in Toraiwa Village (during the late Edo period) to be 36.8 years and 36.5 years, respectively. In his study, an individual's birth year was set to age 0 using a simple method that downgraded traditional age 1 to age 0. Hayami19) used Edo-period documents (Shumon-Ninbetsuaratame-cho) to estimate the LE of people at the time. While he was unable to calculate LE at birth, he reported the LE at age 2 as 32.0 years for males and 30.0 years for females. Narimatsu15) reported a LE of 37.7 years for males and 36.4 years for females in Niida Village, and a LE of 44.7 years for males and 43.3 years for females in Shimomoriya Village.20) Kalland and Pedersen21) reported an average LE of 44.7 years for males and 43.3 years for females in Senpukuji Village. Based on these reports, the average LE for Edo-period populations is generally estimated to have been in the late 30s to early 40s.
In this study, we estimate that the LE at birth for the Tokugawa Shogun family was around 20 years (male, 20.93 years; female, 20.53 years). This finding is particularly intriguing because the Tokugawa Shogun family was at the height of political and economic power during the Edo period. Given their superior standard of living compared to ordinary people, it is unusual that they might have had a shorter life expectancy than commoners of the time.
However, there are important considerations when comparing our Tokugawa data to previous reports. One key factor is the different methods of age calculation. Traditionally, in Japan, a person’s age was counted as 1 at birth. In the Edo period, according to the lunar calendar, the most significant issue is that there was no concept of "age 0"; individuals were considered to be 1 year old at birth.22) As a result, the life expectancy of Edo-period people may have been overestimated in previous studies. This not only complicates comparisons with modern populations, but also introduces potential inaccuracies in paleodemographic analyses. In our study, we estimate LE by converting all birth dates to the solar calendar and treat the birth year as age 0. We believe this approach largely corrects the errors in previous studies, providing a more accurate representation of life expectancy.
Comparison to Modern Japanese old population
According to the Simple Life Tables published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2023), the LE of modern Japanese is 81.09 years for males and 87.14 years for females, among the highest in the world. The infant mortality rate in modern Japan is approximately 0.2%, meaning about 1.8 deaths per 1,000 live births occur before the age of 1 year.23)
In our study, the infant mortality rate for the Tokugawa Shogun family was much higher: 31.33% for males and 33.85% for females by the end of age 0 (Table 3). This translates to roughly 313 male deaths and 339 female deaths per 1,000 live births before the age of 1. The high infant mortality rate during the Tokugawa period suggests that such rates were likely consistent across pre-modern Japan, as clearly illustrated in the report by Kobayashi.18) In his study, the mortality rates for Toraiwa Village, Nagano Prefecture, during the late Edo period were 49.4% for males (at age 4) and 50% for females (at age 3), indicating that half of all children born in the Edo period did not survive past age 3 or 4.
Following this early period of very high infant mortality, individuals from the Tokugawa Shogun family seem to experience a slower decline in survival rates up to age 10, with the trend continuing into their 70s and 80s (Fig. 1). Since the survival curve after age 10 is nearly linear with a gradual downward slope, it suggests that the mortality rate remained relatively stable throughout this period. According to the classification of survival curves by Pearl and Miner,24) the Tokugawa Shogun family’s survival curve resembles a Type III curve from age 0 to 3 and a Type II curve after age 10. In summary, the death rates of the Tokugawa Shogun family after age 10 were significantly lower than during their infancy.
Causes of Death
In this study, the Tokugawa Shogun family exhibited a lower mortality rate in winter and a higher rate in summer. This pattern is likely due to the fact that, while they were able to stay warm in the elaborately constructed Edo Castle during the winter months, there were no measures to address the heat during the summer. According to Kito,25) in his study of farmers in the Edo and Meiji periods, digestive system diseases were the most common cause of death in summer, while cold weather-related illnesses were the leading cause of death in winter. The causes of death within the Tokugawa Shogun family may not have differed significantly from Kito’s findings. Additionally, it can be inferred that specific causes of death for the Tokugawa Shogun family likely included respiratory infections, bacterial and viral diarrhea, parasitic diseases, and other health issues prevalent throughout the year.2,12,26)
We also consider lead poisoning as a potential cause of death for the Tokugawa Shogun family. Anthropological studies suggest that high-ranking individuals in Edo-period Japan may have been exposed to elevated levels of lead.27-29) But where did this high level of lead come from? One likely source is the cosmetics used during the Edo period. White makeup powder (Oshiroi; 白粉), which is thought to have originated in China, began to be used in Japan as early as the Asuka-Nara period. During the Keicho period (1596–1615), the production of white makeup powder became widespread in Sakai City30) and continued to be used by the Japanese population until the 1970s.31)
We disagree with the notion that the lead in white makeup powder significantly contributed to the high infant mortality rate during the Edo period. This is because children of high-ranking individuals, such as Shoguns and Daimyos, were not breastfed by their noble mothers, who typically used white makeup powder, but rather by nannies from middle- and lower-class warrior families (or sometimes townspeople).32-34) However, for adults, the possibility of lead poisoning as a cause of death cannot be entirely ruled out, particularly for high-ranking females of the Edo period. We believe that further investigation into this issue is necessary in the future.
Conclusion
In this study, we focused on the records of the Tokugawa Shogun family, for which the dates of birth and death are clearly and accurately documented. While records of other high-ranking families, such as the Daimyo or Hatamoto, are often biased, the well-managed records of the Shogun family throughout the Edo period are particularly valuable for estimating the LE of Edo-period Japanese. To eliminate biases caused by the lunar calendar and the traditional concept of age 0, we converted the date records to the solar calendar and counted the birth year as age 0. Our findings reveal that the LE of the Tokugawa family was much lower than that of modern Japanese, despite their status as the supreme elite class during the Edo period. This low LE is primarily attributed to the high infant mortality rate, while the mortality rate after age 10 remained relatively stable.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The researchers claim no conflicts of interest in the article.
FUNDING
This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 22H00020), Japan.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization, HF, DHS; Dara curation, HF, SM, HT; Writing_original draft, HF, DHS; Writing_review & editing, HF, DHS.
REFERENCES
- 1.Crimmins EM. Lifespan and healthspan: past, present, and promise. Gerontologist. 2015;55:901–11. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fujita H. In: Search on Jomon Society. Editorial Committee for the 70th Anniversary Article Collection of Professor Ryuzaburo Takahashi, editor. Tokyo: Rokuichi-Shobo; 2024. [Paleopathology in Jomon period] pp. 445–450. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pearson K. On the methematical theory of errors of judgement, with special reference to the personal equation. P Philos Trans R Soc Lond A. 1902;198:235–99. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1902.0005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Macdonell WR. On the expectation of life in ancient Rome, and in the provinces of Hispania and Lusitania, and Africa. Biometrika. 1913;9:366–80. doi: 10.2307/2331898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Russell HN. Molecules in the sun and stars. Astrophys J. 1964;79:317. doi: 10.1086/143539. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yuan IC. Life tables for a southern Chinese family from 1365 to 1849. Hum Biol. 1931;3:157–79. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nagaoka T, Hirata K, Yokota E, Matsu'ura S. Paleodemography of a medieval population in Japan: analysis of human skeletal remains from the Yuigahama-minami site. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;131:1–14. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nagaoka T, Hirata K. Reconstruction of paleodemographic characteristics from skeletal age at death distributions: perspectives from Hitotsubashi, Japan. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;134:301–11. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nagaoka T, Hirata K. Demographic structure of skeletal populations in historic Japan: a new estimation of adult age-at-death distributions based on the auricular surface of the ilium. J Archaeol Sci. 2008;35:1370–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nagaoka T, Sawada J, Hirata K. Did the Jomon people have a short lifespan?: evidence from the adult age-at-death estimation based on the auricular surface of the ilium. Anthropol Sci. 2008;116:161–9. doi: 10.1537/ase.070724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nagaoka T, Sawada J, Hirata K. Demographic and pathological characteristics of the medieval Japanese: new evidence from human skeletons from Kamakura, Japan. Anthropol Sci. 2013;121:203–16. doi: 10.1537/ase.131010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fujita H. [Paleopathology and morphological futures on Jomon skeletal remains]. In: Jomon Society from scientific inquiry. Tokyo, Japan: Doseisha; 2022. pp. 73–99. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hayami A. [The population, economy and society of Nobi-area in premodern Japan] Tokyo, Japan: Soubunsha; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakajima M. The possibility of “family” from the standpoint of Shumon Aratame Cho. Sociol Rev. 2018;69:287–302. doi: 10.4057/jsr.69.287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Narimatsu S. [Northeastern agriculture village in the Edo Period: Niida Village, Nihonmatsu Clan] Tokyo, Japan: Doubunkan-shuppan; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takeuchi M. [Tokugawa Shogunate encyclopedia] Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo-do Shuppan; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hayami A. [Japan through historical demography] Tokyo, Japan: Bungeishunjyu; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kobayashi K. On the expectation of life in the late Tokugawa period. J Anthropol Soc Nippon. 1956;65:32–43. doi: 10.1537/ase1911.65.32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hayami A. [An application of the family reconstruction method to the historical demography in Tokugawa Japan] Keio J Econ. 1967;60:1159–76. doi: 10.14991/001.19671001-0053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Narimatsu S. [People of rural Tohoku in the Early Modern Period: Shimomoriya Village, Asaka District, Oshu] Kyoto, Japan: Mineruba-Shobo; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kalland A, Pedersen J. Famine and population in Fukuoka domain during the Tokugawa period. J Jpn Stud. 1984;10:31–72. doi: 10.2307/132181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nagasawa K. [Life tables of common people in the early 19th century] Bull Inst Res Humanit Ritsumeikan Uni. 2006;87:215–26. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare . Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; 2023. Overview of the annual population dynamics statistics report (provisional) for 2023 (Reiwa 5) [Internet] [cited 2025 Jan 9]. Available from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai23/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pearl R, Miner JR. Experimental studies on the duration of life: XIV. The comparative mortality of certain lower organisms. Q Rev Biol. 1935;10:60–79. doi: 10.1086/394476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kito H. [Lifespans and life cycles of people in the Edo period] Science (Kagaku) 2004;74:1438–42. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shin DH, Fujita H, Hong JH. In: Quarterly Archaeology Special Issue 44: Paleopathology of urbanization. Fujita H, Shin DH, editors. Tokyo, Japan: Yuzankaku; 2023. Urbanization and parasitic infections in human history; pp. 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ueno Y, Watanabe M. Section 2: An examination of toilet sites based on excavation report 4, Archaeological Research Division, The University of Tokyo. Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo; 1990. pp. 364–8. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kakinuma Y, Jun Yoshinaga J, Kondo O, Katayama K, Fujisawa T, Yoneda Y. [Study on the source of lead pollution at the time by lead analysis of ancient human bones from the Edo period] Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2008;63:407. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoshinaga J, Hisada A, Yoneda M, Ishida H. [Lead content of bones excavated from archaeological sites in Hokkaido] Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2013;68:53–7. doi: 10.1265/jjh.68.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Niitsu H. About face powder part 1. Kaji to Eisei. 1930;6(5):17–22. [Google Scholar]
- 31.O'Malley GF, O'Malley R. Lead Poisoning (Plumbism) Rathway, NJ: Merck and Co. Inc; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yamamoto H. [Real images of the Edo period shoguns and samurai that do not appear in textbooks] Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo-Shoseki; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sawayama M. [Milk and children in Edo] Tokyo, Japan: Yoshikawa-Koubunkan; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fukuda C. Kasuga no tsubone. Tokyo, Japan: Mineruba; 2017. pp. 151–3. [Google Scholar]
