Skip to main content
JSES International logoLink to JSES International
. 2025 Jun 3;9(5):1781–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.013

Trends of shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair in Japan: national database analysis

Masataka Minami a,b,, Masamitsu Kido b, Yoshikazu Kida b, Ausberto R Velasquez Garcia a,c, Kenji Takahashi b, Shawn W O'Driscoll a
PMCID: PMC12490621  PMID: 41049679

Abstract

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was introduced to Japan in 2014, principally to treat cuff tear arthropathy and irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. Its indications have expanded significantly worldwide since then. This study aimed to analyze the annual trends in shoulder arthroplasties and rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) from 2014 to 2022 and to examine differences by sex and age group using a publicly available national database.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare in Japan. The surgical categories analyzed included shoulder arthroplasty and RCR between 2014 and 2022. The annual number of surgeries was reported according to sex and age group. Age-specific incidence was calculated per 100,000 people using age group population data. Descriptive statistics and the independent t-test were used for comparisons by sex and age, and linear regression analysis was applied to assess trends.

Results

Shoulder arthroplasties increased dramatically from 1,246 in 2014 to 5,439 in 2022. From 2014 to 2022, the number of RCRs did not decrease; in fact, they continued to increase steadily from 17,553 to 21,183, except for a dip in 2020. Shoulder arthroplasties were nearly twice as common in females, whereas RCRs were more frequent in males. Shoulder arthroplasties peaked in the 75-79 age group, with an average age of 78 years, whereas RCRs were most frequent in the 70-74 age group, averaging 67 years.

Discussion and Conclusion

Despite the substantial increase in shoulder arthroplasties, the number of RCRs has also slightly increased. These findings demonstrate that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty did not simply replace RCRs but complement conventional RCR in the treatment spectrum of shoulder disorders. The findings indicated that females had a higher prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty procedures, whereas males were more likely to undergo RCR. In addition, the patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty tended to be older than those who underwent RCR. These observations may be attributed to sex-specific differences in the progression of shoulder conditions and the accessibility of various treatment approaches or possibly a difference in indications for surgery in females and males. This study demonstrated substantial increases in shoulder arthroplasties in Japan over the past decade, with notable differences in age and sex distributions compared with conventional RCR.

Keywords: Rotator cuff tear, Rotator cuff repair, Shoulder arthroplasty, Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, National database, Epidemiology


Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are among the most common shoulder disorders, particularly affecting middle-aged and elderly patients, leading to pain and functional disability.18,40 In Japan, the aging population has increased the incidence of RCT, making effective management a critical public health concern.25,46 Conservative treatments are often the first line of management for RCT; however, surgical intervention becomes necessary when nonoperative management fails.20,22,28 Although rotator cuff repair (RCR) is the most frequently performed surgical procedure for these injuries,42 shoulder arthroplasty is often required in cases in which functional cuff repair is not feasible or in the presence of cuff tear arthropathy.1,5,6

Developed by Grammont et al in 1987, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has revolutionized the treatment of complex shoulder conditions,9 demonstrating excellent clinical outcomes across various patient populations, especially those with massive irreparable RCT and with cuff tear arthropathy.6 Owing to its efficacy, the adoption of rTSA has increased dramatically worldwide, particularly in the United States.2, 3, 4,8 In Japan, rTSA was approved much later in 2014, which may have influenced the surgical trends for RCT surgeries.38

According to an annual report by the Japanese Society for Replacement Arthroplasty (JSRA), the number of rTSA in Japan has increased from 630 in 2014 to 4,679 in 2022, accounting for over 84% of all shoulder arthroplasties in recent years.10,12 Despite this remarkable increase, there is limited data on how the introduction of rTSA has impacted the overall trends in RCRs and shoulder arthroplasties in Japan.

The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare in Japan operates the NDB Open Data Japan, one of the most expansive health-care databases on a national level globally, encompassing more than 95% of all insurance claims.14,16,17,26

This study aimed to analyze the annual trends in shoulder arthroplasties and RCRs from 2014 to 2022 using data from the national database to determine any significant changes in trends for rotator cuff surgery or shoulder arthroplasty in Japan. We also examined differences by sex and age group to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of RCT surgeries in Japan. We hypothesized that the advent of rTSA has substantially altered treatment options for RCTs, affecting not only the frequency of arthroplasty procedures but also RCR.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a retrospective study using the following 2 databases. We mainly used the NDB Open Data Japan, public data with compiled claims information, operated by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare in Japan.26 The NDB guidelines stipulate that fewer than 10 procedures per year should be masked to ensure the confidentiality of the patients and avoid the identification of personal information. To supplement more detailed data, we also used the annual report of the JSRA.12

Data collection

Data were retrieved from the NDB Open Data Japan website for 2014-2022. We used Microsoft Excel files titled “Number of calculations by division, sex, and age group” under “Surgery (code K). The numbers of outpatient and inpatient surgeries were summed for each year. We included 1) shoulder arthroplasty and 2) RCR as surgeries for RCT. Humerus head replacement (hemi shoulder arthroplasty), removal of arthroplasty, revision of arthroplasty, and arthroplasty for joints other than the shoulder were excluded. Finally, we extracted data for the following surgical procedures (Table I):

  • 1)
    Total shoulder arthroplasty
    • Arthroplasty (code K082)
  • 2)
    RCR
    • RCR (code K080-3),
    • Arthroscopic RCR (code K080-4).

Table I.

Associated surgical codes used in this study.

Surgical code Classification Specification
K080-3 Rotator cuff repair Simple
Complex
K080-4 Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Simple
Complex
K082 Arthroplasty Arthroplasty (shoulder)

Rotator cuff repair includes cuff tear repair regardless of additional procedures, such as tenotomy and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps, but does not include only débridement, synovectomy, acromioplasty, and bursectomy.

Complex rotator cuff repair is defined as the procedure that is performed for cuff tears of 5 cm or more, involving fascia transplantation or muscle transfer, superior capsular reconstruction, patch replacement, and muscle advancement.

Both categories of RCR surgery include simple and complex procedures. In general, RCR includes cuff tear repair regardless of additional procedures, such as tenotomy and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps but does not include only débridement, synovectomy, acromioplasty, and bursectomy. Complex RCRs are defined as procedures that are performed for cuff tears of 5 cm or more, involving fascia transplantation or muscle transfer, superior capsular reconstruction, patch replacement, and muscle advancement. In NDB Open Data Japan, shoulder arthroplasty combines both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and rTSA. To distinguish between rTSA and aTSA, we extracted data from the annual report of the replacement arthroplasty national registry published on the JSRA website.12 JSRA data were derived from reports performed directly by orthopedic surgeons and could have distinguished between rTSA and aTSA only since 2016.

Data analysis

For each surgical procedure, shoulder arthroplasty and RCR, we extracted the following:

  • Total annual numbers: The total number of surgeries performed yearly from 2014 to 2022.

  • Annual numbers by sex: The number of surgeries performed annually stratified by sex (male and female).

  • Annual numbers by age group: The number of surgeries performed annually, categorized into 5-year age intervals (eg, 50-54 and 55-59 years).

Age-specific incidence rates were calculated by dividing the number of surgeries in each age group by the 2015 Japan Standard Population, based on the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications website data.33,39

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and identify the annual trends in surgical procedures. The number of surgeries between the surgical types (shoulder arthroplasty vs RCR, open RCR vs arthroscopic RCR, and simple RCR vs complex RCR) were compared using independent t-tests. The mean age for each surgery type was calculated based on the age group distributions and compared between sexes and surgery types using an independent t-test. Age-specific incidence rates were expressed as the number of surgeries per 100,000 people. Linear regression analysis assessed trends in the number of surgeries and mean age within the groups over time. We used data from 2014 to 2022 to project the shoulder arthroplasty and RCR counts and incidence rates through 2030. Linear regression models (Python 3.13 and scikit-learn 1.5.2; Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE, USA) projected gradual increases for the younger age groups in both procedures.31 For shoulder arthroplasty, conservative adjustments were applied to older age groups (75+ years) to control growth due to saturation trends, while standard linear models were used for RCR across all age groups. The remaining statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 29.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For independent t-tests, the results were presented using mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For linear regression analyses, the results were reported using coefficients and their 95% CI.

Results

Annual number of surgeries

According to the NDB Open Data Japan, the number of shoulder arthroplasties increased dramatically each year from 1,246 in 2014 to 5,439 in 2022, more than fourfold (annual increase: 531 surgeries; 95% CIs: 530-532). (Fig. 1, A, Table II). Our projections indicate that this upward trend will continue, with procedures expected to reach approximately 7,644 by 2027 and 9,166 by 2030, driven primarily by rising demand in patients over 60 years of age (Fig. 2). According to the annual report of the JSRA, the percentage of arthroplasties that were rTSA was 94%, 87%, 85%, and 85% from 2016 to 2019, respectively (Fig. 3, A). From 2020 to 2022, the number of rTSA surgeries increased by nearly 800 surgeries each year to 3,074, 3,850, and 4,679, and the percentage of rTSA surgeries increased gradually to 84%, 86%, and 87%, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Annual number of surgeries by sex in Japan between 2014 and 2022. (A) The line and bars for each year indicate the number of shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. The blue bars indicate the number of surgeries for males, the pink bars indicate the number of surgeries for females, and the green line indicates the total number of surgeries for males and females combined. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved. (B) The line and bars indicate the number of rotator cuff repair surgeries. The blue bars indicate the number of surgeries for males, the pink line indicates the number of surgeries for females, and the orange line indicates the total number of surgeries for males and females combined. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

Table II.

Annual number of shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair based on the NDB Open Data Japan between 2014 and 2022.

Procedure 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Shoulder arthroplasty 1,246 1,578 2,009 2,454 3,008 3,548 3,834 4,559 5,439 27,675
Total rotator cuff repair 17,553 17,531 17,562 19,065 20,412 21,058 20,144 20,565 21,183 175,073
 Open rotator cuff repair 2,923 2,836 2,528 2,503 2,393 2,188 2,053 1,932 1,825 21,181
 Simple 2,349 2,364 2,091 2,101 2,028 1,855 1,740 1,657 1,584 17,769
 Complex 574 472 437 402 365 333 313 275 241 3,412
 Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair 14,630 14,695 15,034 16,562 18,019 18,870 18,091 18,633 19,358 153,892
 Simple 12,490 12,918 13,269 14,671 15,986 16,732 16,159 16,693 17,710 136,628
 Complex 2,140 1,777 1,765 1,891 2,033 2,138 1,932 1,940 1,648 17,264

NDB, the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The number of rotator cuff repairs and shoulder arthroplasty from 2014 to 2022 and the prediction from 2023 to 2030. The solid line indicates the actual number of surgeries from 2014 to 2022, and the dotted line indicates the prediction for 2023 to 2030. The orange line indicates rotator cuff repair and the green indicates shoulder arthroplasty. The prediction was based on changes in the number of surgeries and Japanese population distribution data from 2014 to 2022. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Annual number of surgeries in Japan between 2014 and 2022. (A) The bars for each year indicate the number of shoulder arthroplasty based on the 2 different databases. The light green and dark green bars on the Left indicate the number of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) based on the annual report of the Japanese Society for Replacement Arthroplasty (JSRA), respectively. The green bars on the Right indicate the number of shoulder arthroplasty, including rTSA and aTSA, based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups (NDB). Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved. (B) The bars for each year indicate the number of rotator cuff repair surgeries. The yellow and gray bars on the Left indicate the number of open simple and complex surgeries, respectively, and the orange and black bars on the Right indicate the number of arthroscopic simple and complex surgeries, respectively. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

The overall number of RCRs did not decrease as rTSA became more popular, but actually increased gradually steadily from 17,553 in 2014 to 21,183 in 2022 (Fig. 1, B). The total number of RCRs was significantly greater than the number of shoulder arthroplasties (mean difference: 16,378; 95% CI: 14,901-17,854). The overall breakdown of RCRs showed that arthroscopic surgeries were more common than open surgeries in all years, with at least 4 times as many surgeries performed each year (mean difference: 14,746; 95% CI: 13,276-16,216) (Fig. 3, B, Table II). The number of arthroscopic RCRs increased gradually from 14,630 in 2014 to 19,358 in 2022 (annual increase: 643 surgeries; 95% CI: 642-644), whereas the number of open RCRs declined from 2,923 in 2014 to 1,825 in 2022 (annual decrease: 140 surgeries; 95% CI: 140-141). Comparing simple and complex RCR, simple RCR has been gradually increasing, with an annual increase of 565 surgeries (95% CI: 386-745) (Fig. 4, A, Table III). On the other hand, the number of complex RCR surgeries gradually tended to decrease from 2,714 in 2014 to 1,889 in 2022, although this trend was not statistically significant (annual decrease: 52 surgeries; 95% CI: −4 to 109). Due to this opposite trend, the proportion of complex RCR surgeries in the total number of RCR surgeries significantly decreased from 16% to 9% (annual decrease: 0.6%; 95% CI: 0.4-0.8) (Fig. 4, B). The projections indicate that the total number of RCRs is increasing at a rate of 513 per year and will reach approximately 25,000 by 2030 (Fig. 2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Annual number and percentage of rotator cuff repair in Japan between 2014 and 2022. (A) Annual number of rotator cuff repair in Japan between 2014 and 2022. The lines for each year indicate the number of rotator cuff repair surgeries. The orange line indicates the number of simple rotator cuff repair surgeries and the black line indicates the number of complex rotator cuff repair surgeries. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved. (B) The percentage of rotator cuff repair in Japan between 2014 and 2022. The bars for each year indicate the percentage of the 2 types of rotator cuff repair surgery in total rotator cuff repair surgery. The orange bars indicate the percentage of simple rotator cuff repair surgery, and the black bars indicate the percentage of complex rotator cuff repair surgery. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

Table III.

The number of surgeries and incidence of simple and complex rotator cuff repair between 2014 and 2022.

Procedure and age group 2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc.
Simple rotator cuff repair 14,839 11.8 15,360 12.2 15,360 12.3 16,772 13.4 18,014 14.4 18,587 14.8 17,899 14.3 18,350 14.6 19,294 15.4
Complex rotator cuff repair 2,714 2.2 2,249 1.8 2,202 1.8 2,293 1.8 2,398 1.9 2,471 2.0 2,245 1.8 2,215 1.8 1,889 1.5

No., number; Inc., incidence.

Incidence rates represent the number of surgeries per 100,000 people and were calculated by dividing by 2015 Japan standard population.

Surgeries stratified by sex

Over the 9-year period, the total number of shoulder arthroplasties performed was 8,139 (30%) in males and 19,253 (70%) in females. Shoulder arthroplasty was almost twice as common in females in all 9 years (mean difference: 1,235; 95% CI: 456-2,014) (Fig. 1, A).

However, during the 9-year period, the total number of RCRs was 98,992 (57%) in males and 75,018 (43%) in females. Throughout the 9-year period, RCRs were significantly more common in males (mean difference: 2,664; 95% CI: 1,887-3,440) (Fig. 1, B).

Surgeries stratified by age and sex

For shoulder arthroplasty, the most common age group for males and females over 9 years was 75-79, with a mean age of 78 years (Fig. 5, A). In males, the mean age was 76 years, while in females, it was 79 years, with a high trend (mean difference: 2.8 years; 95% CI: 2.4-3.2). Looking at the 9-year change in the combined figures for males and females, the mean age of shoulder arthroplasty slightly increased from 77 years in 2014 to 78 years in 2022 (annual increase: 0.12 years; 95% CI: 0.07-0.17) (Fig. 6, A). The 9-year trend shows a uniform increase in the number of shoulder arthroplasties in all age groups.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Total numbers of surgeries by age groups between 2014 and 2022. (A) The bars for each age group indicate the number of shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. Blue bars indicate the number of surgeries for males, pink bars indicate the number of surgeries for females, and green bars indicate the total number of surgeries for males and females combined. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved. (B) The bars for each age group indicate the number of rotator cuff repair surgeries. Blue bars indicate the number of surgeries for males, pink bars indicate the number of surgeries for females, and orange bars indicate the total number of surgeries for males and females combined. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Changes in the number of surgeries in Japan between 2014 and 2022. (A) The green bars indicate the number of shoulder arthroplasty. The number of surgeries in each age group from left to right from 2014 to 2022. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved. (B) The orange bars indicate the number of rotator cuff repairs. The number of surgeries in each age group from left to right from 2014 to 2022. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

The most common age group of RCR over the 9-year period was 70-74 years, with a mean age of 67 years (Fig. 5, B). In males, the most common age group of RCR over a 9-year period was 65-69 years, with a mean age of 65 years, while in females, the most common age group of RCR was 70-74 years, with a mean age of 68 years, showing a tendency for females to be older (mean difference: 3.3 years; 95% CI: 3.1-3.4). Looking at the 9-year change in the combined figures for males and females, the average age was 66 years in 2014 and 67 years in 2022, without significant change in the average age (annual increase: 0.02 years; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.05) (Fig. 6, B). There was an increasing trend in the 50-54, 55-59, 70-74, 75-79, and 80-84 age groups, while there was little change in the 60-64 age group, and the number of surgeries in the 65-69 age group has been declining since 2020.

Age-specific incidence

The incidence of surgery per 100,000 people in each age group is shown in Tables III and IV. Shoulder arthroplasty was performed most frequently in the 75-79 or 80-84 age group, with an incidence as high as 29 per 100,000 population by age group. RCR was performed most frequently in the 70-74 age group, with an incidence of 44-57 per 100,000 people throughout the 9 years. The incidence of RCRs in the total population remained between 14 and 17 for RCR (Fig. 7). In contrast, it was much lower for shoulder arthroplasty than for RCR (mean difference: 13.0; 95% CI: 11.7-14.2), although the trend increased from 1 to 4. Across all 9 years, males had a higher incidence of RCR (mean difference: 5.0; 95% CI: 3.7-6.4), while females had a higher incidence of shoulder arthroplasty (mean difference: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.6-3.0).

Table IV.

The number of surgeries and age-specific incidence of shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair between 2014 and 2022.

Procedure and age group 2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc. No. Inc.
Shoulder arthroplasty
 Under 44 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
 45-49 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
 50-54 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.1 24 0.3 12 0.1 24 0.3 17 0.2
 55-59 0 0.0 0 0.0 13 0.1 26 0.3 28 0.3 40 0.5 49 0.6 39 0.4 49 0.6
 60-64 46 0.5 48 0.5 68 0.7 62 0.7 70 0.8 63 0.7 86 0.9 116 1.3 129 1.4
 65-69 121 1.3 136 1.5 139 1.5 182 2.0 217 2.3 241 2.6 295 3.2 333 3.6 391 4.2
 70-74 272 3.4 357 4.5 442 5.6 487 6.2 574 7.3 638 8.1 735 9.3 900 11.4 1,096 13.9
 75-79 361 5.7 456 7.2 576 9.1 762 12.1 970 15.4 1,192 18.9 1,170 18.6 1,295 20.5 1,486 23.6
 80-84 303 6.4 386 8.2 480 10.2 555 11.8 726 15.4 877 18.6 926 19.6 1,129 23.9 1,389 29.4
 85-89 104 3.3 137 4.4 227 7.2 293 9.3 325 10.4 379 12.1 437 13.9 561 17.9 705 22.5
 Over 90 0 0.0 25 1.3 40 2.0 43 2.2 55 2.8 76 3.9 78 4.0 139 7.1 143 7.3
 Total 1,246 1.0 1,578 1.3 2,009 1.6 2,454 2.0 3,008 2.4 3,548 2.8 3,834 3.1 4,559 3.6 5,439 4.3
Rotator cuff repair
 Under 44 465 0.8 484 0.8 446 0.8 483 0.8 514 0.9 532 0.9 513 0.9 451 0.8 445 0.8
 45-49 628 7.7 630 7.8 722 8.9 780 9.6 839 10.3 894 11.0 948 11.7 927 11.4 913 11.3
 50-54 1,100 13.0 1,119 13.2 1,101 13.0 1,206 14.3 1,428 16.9 1,499 17.7 1,449 17.1 1,606 19.0 1,648 19.5
 55-59 1,661 18.9 1,692 19.2 1,706 19.4 1,865 21.2 2,029 23.1 2,117 24.1 2,053 23.3 2,157 24.5 2,297 26.1
 60-64 2,909 31.8 2,765 30.3 2,684 29.4 2,789 30.5 2,941 32.2 2,923 32.0 2,933 32.1 3,024 33.1 2,985 32.7
 65-69 3,864 41.8 4,021 43.5 4,121 44.6 4,328 46.8 4,341 47.0 4,259 46.1 3,778 40.9 3,744 40.5 3,771 40.8
 70-74 3,758 47.6 3,663 46.4 3,442 43.6 3,810 48.3 3,987 50.5 4,362 55.3 4,325 54.8 4,523 57.3 4,501 57.0
 75-79 2,183 34.6 2,230 35.4 2,311 36.6 2,674 42.4 3,030 48.0 3,149 49.9 2,827 44.8 2,769 43.9 3,082 48.9
 80-84 747 15.8 717 15.2 786 16.7 848 18.0 1,001 21.2 1,010 21.4 988 20.9 1,011 21.4 1,160 24.6
 85-89 139 4.4 114 3.6 112 3.6 204 6.5 189 6.0 194 6.2 196 6.3 232 7.4 209 6.7
 Over 90 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 13 0.7
 Total 17,553 14.0 17,531 14.0 17,562 14.0 19,065 15.2 20,412 16.3 21,058 16.8 20,144 16.1 20,565 16.4 21,183 16.9

No., number; Inc., incidence.

Incidence rates represent the number of surgeries per 100,000 people and were calculated by dividing by 2015 Japan standard population.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Changes in the incidence of the surgery in the Japanese population between 2014 and 2022. The solid line and circle graphs indicate rotator cuff repair, and the dotted line and square graphs indicate shoulder arthroplasty. Orange indicates rotator cuff repair, green indicates shoulder arthroplasty for males and females combined, and pink and blue indicate males and females for each procedure, respectively. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, all rights reserved.

Discussion

This nationwide analysis of shoulder surgery trends in Japan from 2014 to 2022 reveals 2 main findings. First, shoulder arthroplasty procedures demonstrated a substantial rise, more than quadrupling throughout the period. This was predominantly due to the increase in utilization of rTSA. Secondly, this increase in rTSA was not reflected by a decrease in RCR surgeries. The annual number of RCR surgeries, including primary repairs and joint-preserving procedures, steadily increased during the same time frame, while the proportion of complex RCR procedures showed a decreasing trend over this period.

Taken together, these findings suggest 2 things. The first is that the indications for rTSA expanded after its introduction in Japan to conditions beyond cuff tear arthropathy and irreparable massive cuff tears. This has been recognized elsewhere in the world, where rTSA is becoming preferred over aTSA for revision arthroplasty,34 sequelae of proximal humeral fractures,29 and for Walch B2 glenoid defects.32

The second implication is that the steady increase in RCR, particularly simple RCR, aligns with global trends and probably reflects advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques, improved patient outcomes, and increased surgeon proficiency and training.13,15,44 The fact that the proportion of complex RCRs observed in this study tended to decrease over the 9-year period is consistent with the increased utilization of rTSA.

Several factors may explain the observed trends. Japan presents a unique scenario due to the delayed approval of rTSA until 2014, in contrast to the United States and Europe, where rTSA has been widely adopted since the early 2000s. Katano et al analyzed the trends in arthroplasty in Japan between 2014 and 2017, including joints other than the shoulder.14 In contrast to other joint replacement procedures, the annual number of shoulder arthroplasties increased significantly. The authors suggest that the arrival of rTSA may have influenced the dramatic increase in shoulder arthroplasties observed in this study.

The sustained increase in rTSA likely stems from its proven efficacy in treating cuff tear arthropathy and irreparable RCT, which are more prevalent in the aging population. Japan's aging demographic, with a growing elderly population, may contribute to the increased demand for arthroplasty.23 Age-specific trends in our study revealed that RCRs were most frequent in the 70-74 age group, while arthroplasties were most common in patients aged 75-79 years. The findings demonstrated that rTSA is becoming a preferred option for older patients, likely due to its efficacy in treating cuff tear arthropathy and other complex conditions characteristic of these age groups.

Another important finding of this study is related to sex differences in surgical procedure distribution. We found that RCR was consistently performed more frequently in males, accounting for 57% of all procedures. This finding was consistent with the study by Li et al, who also found that 57% of RCR was performed in males.19 This result could be explained by the higher incidence of RCT found in males in previous studies.11,46 But it is also possible that RCRs in postmenopausal women are considered more likely to fail, and so are not as likely to be recommended for repair.7,48

In contrast, the distribution of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty procedures was higher in females (70%) than in males (30%). In addition, patients treated with shoulder arthroplasties (78 years) were generally older than those undergoing RCR (67 years). These results are consistent with that of Petel et al, who found that 59% of patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty in the United States were female and significantly older than males.30 This may be related to the fact that females had longer life expectancy and the female population is more significant among older people.37,41 It might also be related to patients or surgeons having a higher threshold for joint replacement in men, especially if they are still quite active.

Our findings reveal a markedly lower incidence of RCR and shoulder arthroplasty in Japan compared to other countries. In the United States, RCR incidence per 100,000 people was 165 between 2007 and 2016 and is increasing.47 In Europe, Italy reported 62 per 100,000 over a 14-year period,36 and Latin America showed an increase from 25 to 49 per 100,000 from 2008 to 2018.43 Shoulder arthroplasty incidence was 197 per 100,000 in the United States in 2017,8 while multiple European countries averaged 20 per 100,000 in 2014.21 In Japan, RCR and shoulder arthroplasty incidence rates remain much lower (15 and 2 per 100,000 in 2017, respectively). This may be due to different approaches in medical decision-making, rehabilitation systems, and insurance structures.35,45 In addition, Japanese surgeons predominantly utilized joint-preserving surgeries for complex shoulder conditions until rTSA became available.38 In such an environment, distinctive surgeries such as patch autograft,27 superior capsule reconstruction,24 and muscle advancement28 included in complex RCR have been developed. Our study predicts a future rise in shoulder arthroplasty surgeries in Japan, warranting close monitoring of potential shifts in complex RCR frequency.

Our findings suggest that the introduction of rTSA in Japan has broadened the surgical options for managing severe shoulder conditions, such as RCTs and shoulder arthropathy, especially in elderly patients. Clinicians can use these data to better inform patients of their surgical options, particularly when conservative or joint-preserving treatments fail. The remarkable growth in rTSA procedures, supported by encouraging clinical results in a diverse patient demographic and various conditions, is becoming a reliable alternative for appropriate patients.

This study has several limitations. First, this study relies on publicly available national data, which does not include detailed patient-specific information such as comorbidities, surgical outcomes, or postoperative recovery. Also, fewer than 10 surgical procedures are masked to secure patients' anonymity so that the numbers could be more accurate. In terms of age-specific incidence, the result of this study may be influenced by the aging trend in Japan. The higher life expectancy of females may also be relevant. In addition, the NDB Open Data Japan include both rTSA and aTSA in shoulder arthroplasty. Although the annual report of the JSRA can distinguish between rTSA and aTSA, there was a significant discrepancy between the JSRA report and the actual NDB open data from 2016 to 2019. It is thought that the JSRA report during this period did not entirely reflect the exact number reported by orthopedic surgeons. Finally, although the increase in rTSA coincides with a decrease in complex RCR surgeries, suggesting a correlation, we could not calculate the specific percentage of rTSA performed due to RCT-derived conditions. As a result, the observed trend may overestimate the actual impact of rTSA on the number of complex RCR procedures. However, since the JSRA annual report states that 58%-69% of diagnoses of rTSA surgeries were due to irreparable RCT or cuff tear arthropathy, it is reasonable to assume that more than half of shoulder arthroplasty surgeries were consistently RCT-derived.12 Future studies should incorporate more specific data to assess patient characteristics, diagnosis, and clinical outcomes in greater detail.

Conclusion

This study showed that shoulder arthroplasty increased dramatically over the 9 years from 2014 to 2022 following the introduction of rTSA in Japan, while RCR increased steadily but at a much lower rate. This study also revealed that shoulder arthroplasty was more common among females, RCR was more common among males, and the mean age at surgery was higher for shoulder arthroplasty than for RCR. These findings highlight the importance of shoulder arthroplasty, including rTSA, in expanding treatment options for complex shoulder disorders, particularly among older patients, while affirming the continued relevance of RCR.

Disclaimers

Funding: No funding was disclosed by the authors.

Conflicts of interest: Shawn W. O'Driscoll, PhD, MD, and the research foundation with which he is affiliated received royalties from Acumed, LLC; otherwise, he and his immediate family did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. All the other authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Footnotes

This study was exempt from Institutional Board approval and informed consent requirements due to its retrospective design and the use of legally anonymized public data.

References

  • 1.Allert J.W., Sellers T.R., Simon P., Christmas K.N., Patel S., Frankle M.A. Massive rotator cuff tears in patients older than sixty-five: indications for cuff repair versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2018;47 doi: 10.12788/ajo.2018.0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aurich M., Farkhondeh Fal M., Albers S., Krane F., Kircher J. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty policy in Germany - an analysis of the health care reality from 2010 to 2022. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024;34:294–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bacle G., Nové-Josserand L., Garaud P., Walch G. Long-term outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a follow-up of a previous study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:454–461. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.16.00223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Colvin A.C., Egorova N., Harrison A.K., Moskowitz A., Flatow E.L. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:227–233. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.J.00739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cvetanovich G.L., Waterman B.R., Verma N.N., Romeo A.A. Management of the irreparable rotator cuff tear. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:909–917. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ernstbrunner L., Andronic O., Grubhofer F., Camenzind R.S., Wieser K., Gerber C. Long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff dysfunction: a systematic review of longitudinal outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28:774–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fancher A.J., Mok A.C., Vopat M.L., Templeton K., Kimbrel B.K., Tarakemeh A., et al. Comparing sex-specific outcomes after rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10 doi: 10.1177/23259671221086259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Farley K.X., Wilson J.M., Kumar A., Gottschalk M.B., Daly C., Sanchez-Sotelo J., et al. Prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States and the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. JB JS Open Access. 2021;6 doi: 10.2106/jbjs.Oa.20.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grammont P., Trouilloud P., Laffay J., Deries X. Study and development of a new shoulder prosthesis [in French] Rhumatologie. 1987;39:407–418. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inagaki K., Ochiai N., Hashimoto E., Hattori F., Hiraoka Y., Ise S., et al. Postoperative complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study in Japan. JSES Int. 2023;7:642–647. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jain N.B., Higgins L.D., Losina E., Collins J., Blazar P.E., Katz J.N. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal upper extremity ambulatory surgery in the United States. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Japanese Society for Replacement Arthroplasty Annual report; 2024. https://jsra.info/about/surveyreport/ Available at:
  • 13.Jithesh K., Meleppuram J.J., Raju A., Nair A.V., Mundakkal A., Thankappan A., et al. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open double row rotator cuff repair - a prospective randomised control study based on functional and radiological outcomes. J Orthop. 2024;51:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katano H., Ozeki N., Kohno Y., Nakagawa Y., Koga H., Watanabe T., et al. Trends in arthroplasty in Japan by a complete survey, 2014-2017. J Orthop Sci. 2021;26:812–822. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kholinne E., Jeon I.-H. Open rotator cuff repair: where does it stand now? Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7 doi: 10.1177/2325967119S00449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kido M., Ikoma K., Kobayashi Y., Maki M., Ohashi S., Shoda K., et al. The inter-prefectural regional disparity of healthcare resources and representative surgical procedures in orthopaedics and general surgery: a nationwide study in Japan during 2015-2019. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:726. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06820-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kido M., Okada S., Takashima N., Yan L., Uchibori A., Sensaki K., et al. Inter-prefectural and urban-rural regional disparities in lung cancer surgery: a Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2017 to 2019. Surg Today. 2024;54:1428–1436. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02864-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuhn J.E., Dunn W.R., Sanders R., Baumgarten K.M., Bishop J.Y., Brophy R.H., et al. The predictors of surgery for symptomatic, atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears change over time: ten-year outcomes of the MOON shoulder prospective cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106:1563–1572. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li L., Bokshan S.L., Ready L.V., Owens B.D. The primary cost drivers of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a cost-minimization analysis of 40,618 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28:1977–1982. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Longo U.G., Franceschi F., Berton A., Maffulli N., Droena V. Conservative treatment and rotator cuff tear progression. Med Sport Sci. 2012;57:90–99. doi: 10.1159/000328910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lübbeke A., Rees J.L., Barea C., Combescure C., Carr A.J., Silman A.J. International variation in shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017;88:592–599. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1368884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mall N.A., Kim H.M., Keener J.D., Steger-May K., Teefey S.A., Middleton W.D., et al. Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2623–2633. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.I.00506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matsuoka H., Nanmo H., Nojiri S., Nagao M., Nishizaki Y. Projected numbers of knee and hip arthroplasties up to the year 2030 in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2023;28:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mihata T., Lee T.Q., Hasegawa A., Fukunishi K., Kawakami T., Fujisawa Y., et al. Five-year follow-up of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:1921–1930. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Minagawa H., Yamamoto N., Abe H., Fukuda M., Seki N., Kikuchi K., et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: from mass-screening in one village. J Orthop. 2013;10:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ministry of Health LaW NDB open data; 2024. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177182.html Available at:
  • 27.Mori D., Funakoshi N., Yamashita F. Arthroscopic surgery of irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears with low-grade fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus: patch autograft procedure versus partial repair procedure. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:1911–1921. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morihara T., Kida Y., Furukawa R., Sukenari T., Kabuto Y., Kurokawa M., et al. Therapeutic outcomes of muscular advancement by an arthroscopic-assisted modified Debeyre-Patte procedure for irreparable large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23:495–503. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Palsis J.A., Simpson K.N., Matthews J.H., Traven S., Eichinger J.K., Friedman R.J. Current trends in the use of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. Orthopedics. 2018;41:e416–e423. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180409-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Patel A.P., Gronbeck C., Chambers M., Harrington M.A., Halawi M.J. Gender and total joint arthroplasty: variable outcomes by procedure type. Arthroplast Today. 2020;6:517–520. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pedregosa F., Varoquaux G., Gramfort A., Michel V., Thirion B., Grisel O., et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Machine Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–2830. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Polisetty T.S., Swanson D.P., Hart P.J., Cannon D.J., Glass E.A., Jawa A., et al. Anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for management of type B2 and B3 glenoids: a matched-cohort analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32:1629–1637. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Portal site of official statistics of Japan (e-Stat). Official Statistics of Japan; 2024. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en/ Available at:
  • 34.Roche C.P., Flurin P.H., Wright T.W., Zuckerman J.D. Comparison of survivorship and failure modes between anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty across multiple government joint registries for a single platform shoulder system. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2023;81:141–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ruhnke G.W., Wilson S.R., Akamatsu T., Kinoue T., Takashima Y., Goldstein M.K., et al. Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. Chest. 2000;118:1172–1182. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Salvatore G., Longo U.G., Candela V., Berton A., Migliorini F., Petrillo S., et al. Epidemiology of rotator cuff surgery in Italy: regional variation in access to health care. Results from a 14-year nationwide registry. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020;104:329–335. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00625-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shadyab A.H., Macera C.A., Shaffer R.A., Jain S., Gallo L.C., Gass M.L., et al. Ages at menarche and menopause and reproductive lifespan as predictors of exceptional longevity in women: the Women's Health Initiative. Menopause. 2017;24:35–44. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sugaya H. The history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty policy in Japan. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024;34:286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tanaka H., Tanaka S., Togawa K., Katanoda K. Practical implications of the update to the 2015 Japan standard population: mortality archive from 1950 to 2020 in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2023;33:372–380. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20220302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Teunis T., Lubberts B., Reilly B.T., Ring D. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:1913–1921. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tokudome S., Hashimoto S., Igata A. Life expectancy and healthy life expectancy of Japan: the fastest graying society in the world. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:482. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2281-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Varkey D.T., Patterson B.M., Creighton R.A., Spang J.T., Kamath G.V. Initial medical management of rotator cuff tears: a demographic analysis of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in the United States Medicare population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:e378–e385. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vidal C., Lira M.J., de Marinis R., Liendo R., Contreras J.J. Increasing incidence of rotator cuff surgery: a nationwide registry study in Chile. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:1052. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04938-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yadav H., Nho S., Romeo A., MacGillivray J.D. Rotator cuff tears: pathology and repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:409–421. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0686-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamada T., Chen C.C., Zeng W., Levine B., Carter J.M. Global perspectives of different healthcare systems and health: income, education, health disparity, health behaviors and public health in China, Japan and USA. Curr Overv Dis Health Res. 2022;8:86–121. doi: 10.9734/bpi/codhr/v8/6523F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yamamoto A., Takagishi K., Osawa T., Yanagawa T., Nakajima D., Shitara H., et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yanik E.L., Chamberlain A.M., Keener J.D. Trends in rotator cuff repair rates and comorbidity burden among commercially insured patients younger than the age of 65 years, United States 2007-2016. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021;1:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zeng G.J., Hao Y., Lie D.T.T. Gender-based differences in mid-term clinical outcomes and patient acceptable symptomatic state attainment after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: minimum 2-year follow up. J ISAKOS. 2024;9 doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSES International are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES