Abstract
Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) is a rare but serious complication of acute mastoiditis in children. Early diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific symptoms. This study aimed to identify clinical and laboratory predictors of CSVT in children with mastoiditis to support timely imaging and treatment. We performed a retrospective case–control study across two university-affiliated centers from 1999 to 2022 of children with acute mastoiditis who underwent neuroimaging. Clinical, laboratory, imaging, and treatment data from 81 children (40 with CSVT and 41 without) were compared. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of CSVT. Four variables were independently associated with CSVT: abnormal neurologic findings (OR 18.24, 95% CI 3.12–150.62, p < 0.01), persistent fever > 72 h despite antibiotic treatment (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.23–19.92, p = 0.03), prior antibiotic use (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.27–21.16, p = 0.03), and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (OR 1.14 per mg/dL, 95% CI 1.05–1.27, p = 0.03). The model had strong discrimination (AUC = 0.85). Thrombus resolution was documented in 25 of 32 children (median, 3.8 months). Anticoagulation was safe and effective. Thrombophilia testing had limited diagnostic yield. Conclusion: Abnormal neurologic signs, prolonged fever, elevated CRP, and recent antibiotic use are key predictors of CSVT in pediatric mastoiditis. Early imaging and timely anticoagulation contribute to favorable outcomes. Routine thrombophilia screening may have limited utility. These findings may help general pediatricians identify children who need timely referral for neuroimaging and specialist care.
| What is known: |
| • Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) is a rare complication of mastoiditis in children. |
| • Diagnosis of CSVT may be delayed due to nonspecific symptoms. |
| • Anticoagulation is generally safe in children. |
| What is new: |
| • We identified four independent clinical predictors of CSVT. |
| • Early MRI follow-up may allow shorter anticoagulation duration. |
Keywords: Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis, Mastoiditis, Anticoagulation, Thrombophilia, Pediatrics, Predictors
Introduction
Cerebral sinus vein thrombosis (CSVT) is a rare and potentially life-threatening disorder in children that acutely impairs cerebral venous outflow. It can lead to severe complications, including long-term neurological sequelae, and requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The estimated incidence rate of pediatric CSVT is 0.34–0.67 cases per 100,000 children per year and is higher in neonates compared to children [1–5]. CSVT in children outside the neonatal period presents with a wide spectrum of symptoms, including toxic appearance, headache, seizures, paresis, papilledema, and altered mental status [6–9]. Most children diagnosed with CSVT have favorable outcomes, although chronic disability is reported in 25–74% of children with CSVT, and mortality rates range from 4 to 12% [2, 6, 9–12]. However, there is considerable heterogeneity among study populations, etiologies of CSVT, and outcome reports. Additionally, the lack of standardized outcome measurements and the generally short follow-up durations in most studies further complicate the interpretation of these findings.
Most cases of CSVT in otherwise healthy children are associated with acute head and neck infections, particularly as a complication of acute otitis media (AOM) by mastoiditis [2–4, 9]. While the majority of AOM cases are mild and self-limiting, intracranial complications such as meningitis, epidural or intracerebral abscesses, mastoiditis, and, rarely, CSVT may occur in approximately 0.3–3% of cases. However, reported rates of otogenic CSVT vary depending on the population studied and the definitions of complications used [1, 13–15]. Neurological signs of otogenic CSVT in children are often nonspecific, and in very young children, mild neurological symptoms can be misattributed to concurrent acute infections [8, 16–18]. Imaging studies are crucial for diagnosing CSVT, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the preferred modality [19]. However, MRI is not routinely performed in acute settings and is not universally available. Consequently, CSVT is most frequently diagnosed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans [16, 20–22].
The treatment for otogenic CSVT includes antibiotic therapy, along with either conservative or more extensive surgical interventions. Although the use of anticoagulation in pediatric otogenic CSVT was previously debated, and despite the absence of randomized control trials in children, major guidelines in both the USA and Europe now recommend its use. These recommendations are based on observational studies, expert opinion, and extrapolation from data in adult populations [19, 20, 23–28]. Anticoagulation agents in the acute phase include unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), followed by continued treatment with LMWH or vitamin K antagonists. Recent studies have also evaluated the use of oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of pediatric CSVT. Both the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban are now approved for the treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE), based on their equivalence in efficacy and safety compared to standard of care [24, 29, 30]. However, the optimal duration of anticoagulation remains unclear, with current data supporting a treatment duration ranging from 6 weeks to 6 months [20, 25, 31].
In this study, we aimed to evaluate differences in clinical presentation, laboratory markers, and infectious agents between children with acute mastoiditis, with or without associated CSVT. Our primary objective was to identify risk factors for mastoiditis-related CSVT in children in order to improve the diagnosis and early treatment of this rare complication.
Methods
This retrospective, two-center case–control study was conducted at two university-affiliated medical centers. The study population included children (< 18 years) diagnosed with acute mastoiditis between 1999 and 2022 who underwent neuroimaging (CT or MRI) during their initial hospitalization. Children without neuroimaging were excluded because CSVT status could not be ascertained reliably. Indications for neuroimaging were categorized into three groups: (1) persistent fever, defined as a fever lasting more than 72 h after starting parenteral antibiotic therapy and/or a surgical procedure; (2) abnormal neurologic findings, either at presentation or during hospitalization, identified by the treating pediatrician and including specific abnormal neurologic findings (e.g., cranial nerve deficits, ataxia, meningismus) or a global assessment of altered mental status or lethargy; and (3) evaluation by the otorhinolaryngology team for cases with clinical deterioration or lack of improvement at the infection site despite appropriate antibiotic treatment, raising concern for local extension of infection (e.g., subperiosteal abscess, petrositis, or intracranial spread).
Study population
During the study period, a total of 181 children at Kaplan Medical Center and 529 at Shaare Zedek Medical Center were hospitalized with acute mastoiditis. Among these, only those who underwent neuroimaging (n = 54 at Kaplan, n = 105 at Shaare Zedek) were included in the study cohort. Children without neuroimaging were not analyzed, and therefore, the proportion of CSVT among imaged children is not an estimate of incidence among all mastoiditis admissions. For the case–control analysis, we compared children with mastoiditis-related CSVT confirmed on neuroimaging (cases) to children with mastoiditis who underwent neuroimaging but had no evidence of CSVT (controls). All children, from both centers, diagnosed with CSVT (n = 40) were included as cases. Children from Kaplan Medical Center (n = 41) who underwent neuroimaging during the same period and were not diagnosed with CSVT were included as controls, without additional selection (Fig. 1). No differences in the management of acute mastoiditis were noted between the two centers.
Fig. 1.
Study population flowchart
Data were extracted from electronic medical records and included dates of AOM and mastoiditis diagnoses, presenting signs and symptoms, inflammatory markers, radiologic findings (CT and MRI), antibiotic regimens, surgical interventions, neurologic complications, hearing test results, thrombophilia workups, microbiological cultures, viral studies, vaccination history, and clinical outcomes. The institutional review boards of both medical centers approved the study design.
Statistical methods
Continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations or median and ranges, while categorical variables were summarized as counts and percentages. Between-group comparisons were conducted using Student’s t-tests and Mann–Whitney U test, as applicable for continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables, as appropriate. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to quantify the effect of potential risk factors on the probability of CSVT. Variables associated with CSVT at a significance level of p < 0.1 in univariate analysis were selected for multivariate modeling. Statistical significance was set at a two-sided p-value of < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using the R software (version 2024.12. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
The study included 81 children (34 boys), with a median age of approximately 2 years, with a wide age range (Table 1). There were no significant differences in age or sex between children with or without CSVT (Table 1). Similarly, no differences were observed between the groups in terms of underlying rates of recurrent otitis media, prior vaccination status, or antibiotic treatment before hospital admission. The time from admission to CT imaging was comparable between groups, with a median of 3 days. However, the indication for imaging differed significantly. Most children in the control group underwent CT based on expert otorhinolaryngology evaluation, whereas children diagnosed with CSVT were imaged mainly due to persistent fever (Table 1). The majority of children with mastoiditis had a normal neurological examination at presentation, slightly higher in those without CSVT (Table 1).
Table 1.
Comparison of demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics between children with and without CSVT
| Overall N = 81 |
CSVT N = 40 |
Control N = 41 |
p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males, n (%) | 36 (44.4) | 16 (40) | 20 (48.8) | 0.568 |
| Age, months* | 22 (4–156) | 20 (4–156) | 22 (8–130) | 0.657 |
| Recurrent ear infections, n (%) | 23 (28.4) | 13 (32.5) | 10 (24.4) | 0.574 |
| Fully vaccinated, n (%) | 58 (71.6) | 26 (65) | 32 (78) | 0.399 |
| Antibiotic treatment prior to admission, n (%) | 49 (60.5) | 28 (70) | 21 (51.2) | 0.133 |
| Abnormal neurologic findings, n (%) | 15 (18.5) | 11 (27.5) | 4 (9.8) | 0.077 |
| CRP, mg/dL* | 15 (0.95–48.4) | 17.81 (2.9–48.4) | 11.25 (0.95–31.8) | 0.004 |
| WBC × 10⁹/L* | 17.5 (2.4–36) | 16 (2.4–36) | 18.4 (5.8–31.4) | 0.272 |
| Days for admission to CT* | 3.0 (0–17) | 3 (0–17) | 3.0 (1–8) | 0.152 |
| Indication for CT | 0.002 | |||
| a. Prolonged fever | 29 (36.7) | 20 (50) | 9 (23.1) | |
| b. Neurological symptoms | 15 (19) | 10 (25) | 5 (12.8) | |
| c. Otorhinolaryngology evaluation | 35 (44.3) | 10 (25) | 25 (64.1) | |
| Follow-up duration, months* | 28.5 (0–192) | 24 (1–144) | 44 (0–192) | 0.218 |
CSVT cerebral sinus venous thrombosis, CRP C reactive orotein, WBC white blood cells, CT computed tomography
*Median (range)
Bacterial cultures, obtained either from middle ear aspirates or mastoid drainage, were available for 62 children. Of these, 35 yielded positive results, with no significant difference in positive culture between the CSVT and non-CSVT groups. However, the type of bacteria found in aspirates differed between the groups. Fusobacterium necrophorum was significantly more frequent in the CSVT group (37.0% vs. 5.7%), while group A streptococcus (GAS) was more common in the non-CSVT group (20% vs. 3.7%), p < 0.001 (Fig. 2). Notably, 43.5% of all cultures were negative, likely due to prior initiation of parenteral antibiotic therapy, potentially reducing culture yield.
Fig. 2.
Distribution of bacteria isolated from ear cultures among children with mastoiditis-associated CSVT and those without CSVT. Each pie chart illustrates the relative frequency and percentage of bacterial isolates. “Others” includes organisms isolated in fewer than five patients across both groups
All children with mastoiditis-related CSVT received parenteral antibiotic treatment and underwent mastoidectomy as part of their management. Data on anticoagulation were available for 26 children of whom 25 were treated with LMWH. One additional child was documented as not having received anticoagulation; however, no explanation for this deviation was recorded in the medical chart. The median (range) duration of anticoagulation was 3.8 (1.5–12) months. Follow-up MRI was performed in 32 patients at a median (range) of 3.8 (1–9) months, with documented thrombus resolution in 25 cases. None of the children had major bleeding at diagnosis or follow-up. Laboratory evaluation for genetic and acquired thrombophilia was performed in 33 children; 11 had evidence for transient protein S deficiency (n = 5), protein C deficiency (n = 3), or positive lupus anticoagulants (n = 3). Three children with positive lupus anticoagulants and one boy with protein S deficiency were not retested at follow-up. Two children were found to be heterozygotes for factor V Leiden (FVL). On follow-up, two children with CSVT and five children without CSVT had abnormal hearing examinations. One child with CSVT had sixth cranial nerve palsy. There were no clinically meaningful differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the two participating hospitals. Both institutions followed similar imaging practices to confirm CSVT, and adhered to comparable treatments for mastoiditis and CSVT, supporting the validity of pooling data from both sites.
Risk factor analysis for CSVT was performed using both univariate and multivariate approaches (Table 2). Univariate logistic regression analysis identified four clinical variables associated with CSVT in children with mastoiditis: abnormal neurologic findings, prolonged fever, prior antibiotic treatment, and elevated CRP levels with no evidence for multicollinearity. These four variables were subsequently included in a multivariable model, where all four remained independently associated with CSVT. Abnormal neurologic findings emerged as the strongest predictor. White blood cell count was not significantly associated with CSVT and was excluded from the final model. The final model performed well, demonstrating excellent discrimination (AUC 0.85) and good overall fit (AIC 71.4),
Table 2.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for predictors of CSVT
| Univariate OR (95% CI) | Univariate p | Multivariate OR (95% CI) | Multivariate p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormal neurologic findings | 5.00 (1.42–19.77) | 0.01 | 18.24 (3.12–150.62) | < 0.01 |
| Prolonged fever | 5.56 (1.96–17.05) | 0.002 | 4.67 (1.23–19.92) | 0.03 |
| CRP | 1.09 (1.03–1.18) | 0.004 | 1.04 (1.01–1.17) | 0.03 |
| Previous antibiotic treatment | 2.22 (0.91–5.65) | 0.09 | 4.74 (1.27–21.16) | 0.03 |
| WBC count | 0.92 (0.9–1.04) | 0.42 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, CRP C reactive protein, WBC white blood cells
Discussion
In this retrospective case–control study, we identified clinical and microbiological factors associated with CSVT in children with acute mastoiditis. Abnormal neurologic findings, prolonged fever, elevated CRP levels, prior antibiotic treatment, and the isolation of Fusobacterium necrophorum from middle ear aspirates or mastoid drainage were significantly associated with CSVT and may serve as important indicators prompting early neuroimaging in this population. The robust association with abnormal neurologic findings (adjusted OR > 18) highlights the importance of close neurologic monitoring, even in the absence of alarming local findings. While abnormal neurologic findings emerged as the strongest independent predictor of CSVT in our cohort, the wide confidence interval (OR 18.2, 95% CI 3.12–150.62) reflects variability that likely stems from the relatively small number of cases and the low prevalence of neurologic signs at presentation. Although this limits the precision of the effect size estimate, the consistent direction and magnitude of association across univariate and multivariate analyses reinforce the clinical relevance of this finding. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the strength of this association and refine its predictive value. In our cohort, the most common neurologic abnormalities were subtle, primarily lethargy symptoms that are easily overlooked in young children. This observation aligns with the findings of Coutinho et al., who reported that children with CSVT most commonly presented with mild neurologic symptoms such as lethargy [8]. Notably, none of the children in our study presented with seizures, diplopia, or focal neurologic signs on admission, as was previously reported in children with mastoiditis-associated CSVT [16, 32, 33]. However, papilledema and cranial nerve palsy were noted during hospitalization in four children who had normal neurologic evaluation at presentation. As most of the children in our study were very young, we could not effectively evaluate for headaches that were reported in older children, emphasizing the relatively subtle neurologic deficits in younger children [17, 32–34]. Prolonged fever (> 72 h despite parenteral antibiotics) and elevated CRP levels were also significant predictors of CSVT in our analysis, aligning with prior studies demonstrating its association with delayed resolution of infections [16, 35].
Microbiologic findings in our study reveal a significant proportion of negative cultures, likely influenced by the frequent initiation of parenteral antibiotics before sample collection. This observation aligns with prior reports and reinforces the importance of timely sample acquisition [8]. Fusobacterium necrophorum was notably more common among CSVT cases, in agreement with previous studies identifying this organism as a virulent pathogen associated with invasive head and neck infections and thrombotic complications [16]. While our study did not demonstrate a statistically significant association between Fusobacterium necrophorum and CSVT, its known link to thrombogenic infections, as well as other intracranial complications, supports the practice of empirical antibiotic coverage for anaerobic bacteria in suspected cases. Moreover, isolation of Fusobacterium necrophorum, even without definitive causality, should heighten clinical suspicion for CSVT and may aid in decisions regarding early neuroimaging.
The safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy were reaffirmed in our study, with none of the children experiencing major bleeding complications during treatment. This aligns with findings from the systematic review by Wong et al., which reported only eight bleeding events among 190 children with otogenic CSVT [36]. This supports international guidelines and prior reports that also demonstrated the safety of LMWH in pediatric CSVT management [16, 17, 19, 26].
Thrombophilia testing yielded variable results, and its clinical utility remains a topic of debate. Only two children in this cohort were identified with genetic thrombophilia, a stark contrast to prior studies reporting higher rates of 20–96% of prothrombotic abnormalities in pediatric CSVT [16, 17, 36, 37]. Acute transient findings, including lupus anticoagulants or protein S deficiency, were more common in our cohort. Variations in the timing and specific laboratory tests included in the thrombophilia evaluation between different studies limit the ability to draw conclusions on the routine evaluation of thrombophilia in mastoiditis-associated CSVT. However, current guidelines increasingly discourage thrombophilia testing in provoked venous thromboembolism, as supported by recent systematic reviews and international consensus statements [26, 38, 39].
Outcomes in our cohort were excellent, with recanalization observed in most of children undergoing follow-up MRI, achieved within a median time of 3 months. High rates of recanalization following mastoiditis-associated CSVT were already reported, although mostly requiring longer treatment duration [34, 36]. The combination of early diagnosis, prompt initiation of anticoagulation therapy, and multidisciplinary management likely contributed to these favorable outcomes. The relatively short median time to recanalization observed in our study highlights the importance of early follow-up imaging after discharge. Prompt imaging at 6 weeks post-diagnosis could identify children who have achieved complete thrombus resolution, potentially allowing for shorter durations of anticoagulation therapy without compromising safety or efficacy. This approach aligns with the findings of the Kids-DOTT trial, which demonstrated noninferiority of a 6-week anticoagulation course compared to 3 months for children with provoked venous thromboembolism, with no significant increase in recurrence or bleeding risks [31].
The strengths of this study include the relatively large sample size for such a rare complication, and the careful selection of controls to match disease severity and surgical intervention. However, our study has several limitations. As a retrospective analysis, it is subject to inherent biases, including incomplete data and variability in medical record documentation. The inclusion of only children with acute mastoiditis who underwent neuroimaging based on physician-determined clinical indications likely selected for more severe cases, which may limit the applicability of our findings to all children with mastoiditis. Moreover, cases were drawn from the centers, whereas controls came from a single center, potentially introducing unmeasured institutional differences. Although the multivariate model showed strong discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.85), the relatively small number of CSVT cases (n = 40) raises concerns about overfitting. While VIFs were low and no collinearity was detected, the wide confidence intervals, particularly for neurologic symptoms, suggest limited statistical power. Validation in larger, prospective cohorts is needed to confirm these findings. Finally, despite matching for disease severity, unmeasured confounders may have influenced outcomes, and restricting the study to two centers may limit the generalizability of the results to other settings or populations.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of recognizing subtle neurological abnormalities, prior antibiotic treatment, elevated CRP levels, and prolonged fever as key predictors of CSVT in children with mastoiditis. The final model performed well, suggesting it may serve as a clinically useful tool to support early identification of children at risk for CSVT and guide imaging decisions in complex cases.
Our findings reaffirm the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy, while the limited utility of thrombophilia screening suggests a shift towards more targeted evaluations. Early follow-up imaging at 6 weeks post-diagnosis could enable shorter anticoagulation durations in children with complete thrombus resolution, reducing treatment burden without compromising safety.
Abbreviations
- CSVT
Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis
- CT
Computed tomography
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- LMWH
Low-molecular-weight heparin
- CRP
C reactive protein
- WBC
White blood cells
- AOM
Acute otitis media
Authors’ contributions
Y. S, E.Z, M.G, S. R.V, A.E.W, G.L, N.B, Y. L, A.G, I. K, E.S, A. N and T.B.A contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, data collection and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y.S. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kaplan Medical Center and Shaare Zedek Medical Center.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Yael Sellam and Elchanan Zloczower contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Groth A, Enoksson F, Hultcrantz M, Stalfors J, Stenfeldt K, Hermansson A (2012) Acute mastoiditis in children aged 0–16 years—a national study of 678 cases in Sweden comparing different age groups. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(10):1494–1500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.deVeber G, Andrew M, Adams C, Bjornson B, Booth F, Buckley DJ et al (2001) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med 345(6):417–423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heller C, Heinecke A, Junker R, Knofler R, Kosch A, Kurnik K et al (2003) Cerebral venous thrombosis in children: a multifactorial origin. Circulation 108(11):1362–1367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grunt S, Wingeier K, Wehrli E, Boltshauser E, Capone A, Fluss J et al (2010) Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis in Swiss children. Dev Med Child Neurol 52(12):1145–1150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Proano JS, Martinez PA, Sendi P, Totapally BR (2023) Characteristics and outcomes of children with cerebral sinus venous thrombosis. Neurocrit Care 39(2):331–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ichord RN, Benedict SL, Chan AK, Kirkham FJ, Nowak-Gottl U, International Paediatric Stroke Study G (2015) Paediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis: findings of the International Paediatric Stroke Study. Arch Dis Child 100(2):174–9 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Caksen H, Yilmaz SY, Guven AS, Guldibi F, Acikgozoglu S (2023) Risk factors in pediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Childs Nerv Syst 39(1):21–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Coutinho G, Julio S, Matos R, Santos M, Spratley J (2018) Otogenic cerebral venous thrombosis in children: a review of 16 consecutive cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 113:177–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sebire G, Tabarki B, Saunders DE, Leroy I, Liesner R, Saint-Martin C et al (2005) Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children: risk factors, presentation, diagnosis and outcome. Brain 128(Pt 3):477–489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Friefeld SJ, Westmacott R, Macgregor D, Deveber GA (2011) Predictors of quality of life in pediatric survivors of arterial ischemic stroke and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. J Child Neurol 26(9):1186–1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Schryver EL, Blom I, Braun KP, Kappelle LJ, Rinkel GJ, Peters AC et al (2004) Long-term prognosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol 46(8):514–519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kenet G, Waldman D, Lubetsky A, Kornbrut N, Khalil A, Koren A, et al (2004) Paediatric cerebral sinus vein thrombosis. A multi-center, case-controlled study. Thromb Haemost 92(4):713–8 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Leskinen K, Jero J (2004) Complications of acute otitis media in children in southern Finland. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68(3):317–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thompson PL, Gilbert RE, Long PF, Saxena S, Sharland M, Wong IC (2009) Effect of antibiotics for otitis media on mastoiditis in children: a retrospective cohort study using the United Kingdom general practice research database. Pediatrics 123(2):424–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smolinski NE, Djabali EJ, Al-Bahou J, Pomputius A, Antonelli PJ, Winterstein AG (2024) Antibiotic treatment to prevent pediatric acute otitis media infectious complications: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 19(6):e0304742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ulanovski D, Yacobovich J, Kornreich L, Shkalim V, Raveh E (2014) Pediatric otogenic sigmoid sinus thrombosis: 12-year experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(6):930–933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scorpecci A, Massoud M, Giannantonio S, Zangari P, Lucidi D, Martines F et al (2018) Otogenic lateral sinus thrombosis in children: proposal of an experience-based treatment flowchart. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(8):1971–1977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vieira JP, Luis C, Monteiro JP, Temudo T, Campos MM, Quintas S et al (2010) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children: clinical presentation and extension, localization and recanalization of thrombosis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 14(1):80–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mandel-Shorer N, Sabapathy CA, Krishnan P, Sharma M, Goldenberg NA, Brandão LR et al (2022) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in infants and children: a practical approach to management. Semin Pediatr Neurol 44:100993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr, Bushnell CD, Cucchiara B, Cushman M et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42(4):1158–1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Capecchi M, Abbattista M, Martinelli I (2018) Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 16(10):1918–1931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Siag K, Mazzawi S, Koren A, Colodner R, Masalha M, Biener R et al (2021) Pediatric otogenic cerebral sinus vein thrombosis and thrombophilia. Isr Med Assoc J 23(2):99–106 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Biss TT, Chalmers EA (2021) Addendum to British Society for Haematology guideline on the investigation, management and prevention of venous thrombosis in children (Br. J. Haematol. 2011; 154: 196–207). Br J Haematol 194(6):996–998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Connor P, Sanchez van Kammen M, Lensing AWA, Chalmers E, Kallay K, Hege K, et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis (EINSTEIN-Jr CVT). Blood Adv 4(24):6250–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Ferriero DM, Fullerton HJ, Bernard TJ, Billinghurst L, Daniels SR, DeBaun MR et al (2019) Management of stroke in neonates and children: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 50(3):e51–e96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Monagle P, Cuello CA, Augustine C, Bonduel M, Brandao LR, Capman T et al (2018) American society of hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv 2(22):3292–3316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rebelo J, Nayan S, Choong K, Fulford M, Chan A, Sommer DD (2016) To anticoagulate? Controversy in the management of thrombotic complications of head & neck infections. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 88:129–135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lebas A, Chabrier S, Fluss J, Gordon K, Kossorotoff M, Nowak-Gottl U et al (2012) EPNS/SFNP guideline on the anticoagulant treatment of cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children and neonates. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 16(3):219–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Male C, Lensing AWA, Palumbo JS, Kumar R, Nurmeev I, Hege K et al (2020) Rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 7(1):e18–e27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Halton J, Brandao LR, Luciani M, Bomgaars L, Chalmers E, Mitchell LG et al (2021) Dabigatran etexilate for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children (DIVERSITY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2b/3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol 8(1):e22–e33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goldenberg NA, Kittelson JM, Abshire TC, Bonaca M, Casella JF, Dale RA et al (2022) Effect of anticoagulant therapy for 6 weeks vs 3 months on recurrence and bleeding events in patients younger than 21 years of age with provoked venous thromboembolism: the Kids-DOTT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 327(2):129–137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vergadi E, Velegrakis S, Raissaki M, Bitsori M, Karatzanis A, Galanakis E (2021) Acute mastoiditis complicated by cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 141:110508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Havali C, Ince H, Gundogdu EB, Gurkas E, Karal Y, Ekici A et al (2022) The management of elevated intracranial pressure and sinus vein thrombosis associated with mastoiditis: the experience of eighteen patients. Childs Nerv Syst 38(2):421–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ghosh PS, Ghosh D, Goldfarb J, Sabella C (2011) Lateral sinus thrombosis associated with mastoiditis and otitis media in children: a retrospective chart review and review of the literature. J Child Neurol 26(8):1000–1004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trapani S, Stivala M, Lasagni D, Rosati A, Indolfi G (2020) Otogenic lateral sinovenous thrombosis in children: a case series from a single centre and narrative review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 29(10):105184 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.Wong BY, Hickman S, Richards M, Jassar P, Wilson T (2015) Management of paediatric otogenic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 40(6):704–714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Narcy L, Durand S, Grimaud M, Leboucq N, Grevent D, Cambonie G et al (2023) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis associated with head/neck infection in children: clues for improved management. Dev Med Child Neurol 65(2):215–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kenet G, Lutkhoff LK, Albisetti M, Bernard T, Bonduel M, Brandao L et al (2010) Impact of thrombophilia on risk of arterial ischemic stroke or cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in neonates and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Circulation 121(16):1838–1847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meyer MR, Witt DM, Delate T, Johnson SG, Fang M, Go A et al (2015) Thrombophilia testing patterns amongst patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 136(6):1160–1164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


