Abstract
Aquaporin (Aqp) 10 is a member of the aquaglyceriporin family, which transports small, uncharged solutes in addition to water. Although the solute selectivity of aquaglyceroporins varies, the mechanism of solute selectivity has not yet been fully elucidated. The common ancestor of ray-finned fish possessed two paralogous genes for aquaporin 10, aqp10.1 and aqp10.2, which produce Aqps with different solute selectivities. Most teleosts possess one or more ohnologs derived from aqp10.1 and aqp10.2; however, the common ancestor of Anguilliformes species lost all aqp10.1-derived ohnologs. Anguilliformes species, except Anguilla species, have one aqp10.2b, but recent tandem duplications in the European eel have generated three aqp10.2b paralogs (aqp10.2b1–aqp10.2b3), whose activities remain ambiguous. In this study, we found that the four sites forming the aromatic/arginine (ar/R) selectivity filter in European eel Aqp10.2b1 were identical to those in Aqp10.2b of other species. However, the Y residue at position 3 was replaced with G in the ar/R selectivity filter of Aqp10.2b2 and b3. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, Aqp10.2b2 and b3 showed higher permeability to urea and boric acid than Aqp10.2b1, indicating that Aqp10.2b2 and b3 acquired broad solute selectivity similar to that of Aqp10.1, which was lost in the ancestral Anguilliformes species. Urea and boric acid permeabilities of Aqp10.2b1 increased when the Y residue at position 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter was replaced with G. Overall, our results outline the history of the loss and gain of Aqp10 paralogs with broad solute selectivity in anguillid eels.
Keywords: aquaporin 10, European eel, tandem duplication, solute selectivity, neo-subfunctionalization
Significance.
During evolution, vertebrate gene families have undergone various duplications and losses, known as birth-and-death evolution. Vertebrate aquaporin gene (aqp) family has undergone several lineages- and species-specific duplications and losses; however, their roles have not been fully understood. In this study, we evaluated the deletion of an aqp10 paralog specifically observed in Anguilliformes species and a lineage-specific tandem duplication of another aqp10 paralog in Anguilla. We measured the activity of the protein encoded by each aqp10 paralog and identified a process by which Anguilla species reacquired the gene encoding Aqp10 with solute selectivity similar to that of the Aqp lost in ancestral Anguilliformes species. This study provides insights into the gain, loss, and sub-neofunctionalization of aqp genes in Anguilla species approximately 16 million years ago, which is the estimated time of divergence of aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2/b3.
Introduction
Aquaporins (Aqps) are a family of water channels that involve water-specific aquaporins that are only permeable to water and aquaglyceroporins that are permeable to water and uncharged low-molecular-weight substances, such as glycerol (Agre et al. 2002; Login and Nejsum 2023). In mammals, Aqp-3, -7, -9, and -10 are aquaglyceroporins that have been shown to contribute to glycerol handling and urea metabolism in the skin, intestines, kidneys, liver, and adipose tissue (Agre et al. 2002; Login and Nejsum 2023). (Note that, in this article, protein name abbreviations of all species are shown with the first letter capitalized, and gene names of all species are shown as lowercase and italicized.) Aqp10 is one of the members of the aquaglyceroporin subfamily of water channels, and is widely distributed in vertebrates (Finn et al. 2014; Finn and Cerda 2015; Yilmaz et al. 2020). Aqp10 plays an important role in glycerol metabolism and is expressed in the human intestine and adipose tissues (Mobasheri et al. 2004; Gotfryd et al. 2018). Aqp10 paralogs exhibit diversity in the number of genes and solute selectivity among different species. Lobe-finned fish and most tetrapods possess a single aqp10 gene, whereas mice, cattle, and whales lack or pseudogenize aqp10 (Morinaga et al. 2002; Tanaka et al. 2015; Nagashima et al. 2025a). Owing to the absence of aqp10 in mice, prior research on aqp10 analysis using knockout mice has not been conducted. Yilmaz et al. (2020) showed that ray-finned fish tandemly duplicated aqp10 in their ancestral species and acquired aqp10.1 and aqp10.2. Polypterus and gar, known as basal ray-finned fishes, retain aqp10.1 and aqp10.2 in tandem. Therefore, the ancestral teleost species presumably acquired two ohnologs each and four aqp10 paralogs (aqp10.1a and aqp10.1b from aqp10.1 and aqp10.2a and aqp10.2b from aqp10.2) (Yilmaz et al. 2020) via teleost-specific whole-genome duplication (Glasauer and Neuhauss 2014; Ravi and Venkatesh 2018). In previous studies, names for aqp10.1, aqp10.1a, and aqp10.1b were aqp10a (or aqp10aa), aqp10aa, and aqp10ba, respectively (Tingaud-Sequeira et al. 2010; Yilmaz et al. 2020). aqp10.2, aqp10.2a, and aqp10.2b were previously known as aqp10b (or aqp10ab), aqp10ab, and aqp10bb, respectively. In this study, the gene symbols of tandem duplicates are appended with “.1” or “.2,” whereas those of ohnologs—gene duplicates originating from whole-genome duplication—are indicated by “a” or “b,” following the Zebrafish Nomenclature Conventions (http://zfin.org/) (Imaizumi et al. 2024; Nagashima et al. 2025b). Subsequent gene deletions left 2 to 3 aqp10 paralogs in teleost species (Yilmaz et al. 2020). Many teleosts, such as zebrafish, tilapia, medaka, stickleback, and pufferfish, possess aqp10.1a and aqp10.2b on separate chromosomes. Cod and electric eel possess two aqp10.1 ohnologs and one aqp10.2 ohnolog. Herring and shad possess one aqp10.1 ohnolog and two aqp10.2 ohnologs. Analysis of the activity of the aqp10 gene products has shown that Sarcopterygii Aqp10s and Aqp10.1-derived Aqps in ray-finned fish exhibit broad solute selectivity, as they are permeable to water, glycerol, urea, and boric acid, whereas Aqp10.2-derived Aqps in ray-finned fish exhibit narrow solute selectivity, as they are only permeable to water and glycerol, but not or weakly permeable to urea and boric acid (Imaizumi et al. 2024). These results indicate that water, glycerol, urea, and boric acid permeabilities are plesiomorphic activities of Aqp10s and that most ray-finned fish-specific Aqp10.2 paralogs have secondarily reduced or lost urea and boric acid permeability.
The mechanisms that control the permeability of both water and solutes through aquaporins have been clarified through structural biological analyses such as X-ray crystallography, molecular dynamics, and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) (Hub and de Groot 2008; Eriksson et al. 2013; Kreida and Törnroth-Horsefield 2015; Gotfryd et al. 2018; Kozai et al. 2025). Some aquaporins can form homotetramers in the membrane with one channel pore in each subunit. Each subunit forms a narrow pore with six transmembrane domains. The narrow pore region is formed from four amino acid residues containing aromatic and arginine residues and is called an aromatic/arginine (ar/R) selectivity filter. The pore size plays an important role in controlling the permeability of water and other molecules and determines the differences between water-selective aquaporins and aquaglyceroporins, whereas the amino acid residues in the ar/R selectivity filter play an important role in determining the specificity between water-specific aquaporins and aquaglyceroporins. There are two types of aquaglyceroporins: those with relatively high solute selectivity that are highly permeable to glycerol, and those with low solute selectivity that are highly permeable to glycerol, urea, and boric acid. Aqp3 is highly permeable to glycerol and exhibits some urea permeability; however, Aqp7, Aqp9, and Aqp10 are highly permeable to urea, boric acid, and glycerol (Kitchen et al. 2019; Ushio et al. 2022; Kumagai et al. 2023; Nagashima et al. 2025b). Although Aqp8 is not typically classified as an aquaglyceroporin owing to its inability to transport glycerol, some fish Aqp8 channels have been shown to permeate glycerol (Engelund et al. 2013). Furthermore, fish Aqp8 channels are permeable to urea (Tingaud-Sequeira et al. 2010; Engelund et al. 2013; Kumagai et al. 2023). Thus, the solute selectivity of aquaporins is diverse; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood.
Recent studies have shown that the size of the amino acid residues in the ar/R selectivity filter and pore width are involved in the solute selectivity of aquaglyceroporins (Hub and de Groot 2008), and it has become clear that this selectivity can be predicted by the primary sequence (Hub and de Groot 2008; Kitchen et al. 2019; Nagashima et al. 2025b). Human Aqp3 is highly permeable to glycerol but not urea, and the four amino acid residues of the ar/R selectivity filter are F, G, Y, and R. The Y to A mutant at position 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter of human Aqp3 shows good permeability to urea and glycerol (Kitchen et al. 2019). In regard to Aqp10 in bony vertebrates, position 2 of the ar/R selectivity filter of Aqp10 is conserved as a small amino acid residue, and position 4 is conserved as an R (Nagashima et al. 2025b). However, there was diversity between positions 1 and 3. Xenopus Aqp10 and ray-finned fish Aqp10.1 exhibit high permeability to glycerol and urea, showing broad solute selectivity. Positions 1 and 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter of Xenopus Aqp10 are G and Y, respectively, and those of ray-finned fish Aqp10.1 are F and A, respectively. On the other hand, positions 1 and 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter of the ray-finned fish Aqp10.2, which selectively permeates glycerol and exhibits narrow solute selectivity, are F and Y, respectively, and the mutants in which one of these two positions is replaced with G acquire high urea permeability and broad solute selectivity (Nagashima et al. 2025b). These results show that the presence of bulky amino acid residues at positions 1 and 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter determines the narrow solute selectivity and reduces permeability to urea and boric acid. Furthermore, a known correlation exists between the Aqp permeability to urea and boric acid: Aqps with high urea permeability also exhibit high boric acid permeability, while those with low urea permeability show low boric acid permeability. Nevertheless, a certain degree of independence exists between the permeability of Aqp to glycerol and urea or boric acid (Kumagai et al. 2023). At the same time, it has been suggested that the breadth of solute selectivity of Aqp10 can be predicted by examining the amino acid residues at positions 1 and 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter encoded in the genomic databases of a large number of bony vertebrate species (Nagashima et al. 2025b).
Among ray-finned fish, Yilmaz et al. (2020) showed that Anguilliformes are exceptionally deficient in aqp10.1-derived genes. The giant moray, Kaup's arrowtooth eel, and European conger only have aqp10.2b as an aqp10 ortholog. Yilmaz et al. also found that Anguilla species, such as the European eel (Anguilla anguilla), Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica), and American eel (Anguilla rostrata), acquired multiple aqp10 genes via tandem duplication of aqp10.2b. Therefore, ancestral Anguilliformes lost all aqp10 paralogs, other than aqp10.2b, and the ancestral Anguilla species acquired the lineage-specific multiple aqp10.2b paralogs. However, to date, no studies have examined the differences in the functions of the Aqp10.2b paralogs in Anguilla species.
In a previous study, we analyzed 293 amino acid sequences of Aqp10s in the genome databases of various bony vertebrates, classified them as Sarcopterygii Aqp10, Actinopterygii Aqp10.1, and Actinopterygii Aqp10.2, and extracted the amino acid residues at positions 1 and 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter (Nagashima et al. 2025b). Almost all Sarcopterygii Aqp10s and Actinopterygii Aqp10.1s had one or no aromatic residues at positions 1 and 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter. In contrast, most Actinopterygii Aqp10.2s had two aromatic residues at positions 1 and 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter. A few exceptions to this analysis include the European eel Aqp10.2b2 and b3. As described by Yilmaz et al. (2020), these Anguilla-specific paralogs are generated via tandem duplications in the ancestral Anguilla species. However, European eel Aqp10.2b2 and b3 have F and G residues at positions 1 and 3, respectively, in the ar/R selectivity filter. In contrast, European eel Aqp10.2b1 had F and Y residues at positions 1 and 3, respectively, in the ar/R selectivity filter, as observed in most other Actinopterygii Aqp10.2s. This result suggests that the solute selectivities of European eel Aqp10.2b2 and b3 are different from that of Aqp10.2b1 and that the European eel acquired Aqp10 paralogs with different solute selectivities via tandem gene duplication. To verify this hypothesis, we analyzed the activity of European eel Aqp10.2b paralogs expressed in Xenopus oocytes and found that Aqp10.2b2 and b3 acquired high urea and boric acid permeabilities by substituting an aromatic amino acid residue for a glycine residue in the ar/R selectivity filter.
Results
aqp10 Genes in Anguilliformes Species
Composition of aqp10 in Anguilliformes has been previously reported (Yilmaz et al. 2020). Here, we confirmed the results using synteny and phylogenetic analyses. Synteny analysis results of Anguilliformes (Kaup's arrowtooth eel [Synaphobranchus kaupii], giant moray [Gymnothorax javanicus], European conger [Conger conger], giant mottled eel [Anguilla marmorata], Japanese eel [A. japonica], American eel [A. rostrata], and European eel [A. anguilla]) and their related species, such as Roundjaw bonefish (Albula glossodonta in Albuliformes) and Indo-Pacific tarpon (Megalops cyprinoides in Elopiformes), are shown in Fig. 1a and Table S1. Similar to many other teleost species, roundjaw bonefish and Indo-Pacific tarpon had one aqp10.1a and one aqp10.2b at separate chromosomal loci (Fig. 1a). As reported by Yilmaz et al., aqp10.1a was not found at the same locus in Anguilliformes species (Fig. 1a). One aqp10.2b was present in Kaup's arrowtooth eel, giant moray, and European conger, whereas three paralogs for aqp10.2b, aqp10.2b1, aqp10.2b2, and aqp10.2b3, were tandemly present in the European eel (Fig. 1a). In Japanese and American eels, two paralogs, aqp10.2b, aqp10.2b1, and aqp10.2b2, were found at the same locus. Due to the short assembly, synteny analysis of the giant mottled eel could not be performed in this study. However, a BLAST search confirmed the presence of two paralogs, aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2, in giant mottled eel. The accession numbers for the amino acid sequences derived from the predicted protein-coding regions are listed in Table 1.
Fig. 1.
Synteny and phylogenetic analyses of aqp10.2b paralogs in European eel. a) Synteny analyses of aqp10 in Indo-Pacific tarpon, roundjaw bonefish, and Anguilliformes. (+) and (−) (right and left orientations, respectively) genome sequences of various species in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Ensembl databases are illustrated by horizontal lines. Arrow-shaped boxes indicate the orientation of each gene. Phylogeny of bony vertebrate species based on the TimeTree database (http://www.timetree.org/) (Kumar et al. 2017) is shown on the left. The four amino acid residues in the aromatic/arginine (ar/R) selectivity filter in each Aqp10 are shown below the synteny data. Accession numbers of genes are listed in Table S1. b) Phylogenetic analyses of Aqp10 amino acid sequences in Elopomorpha species. The amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW software, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method with MEGA software. Numbers indicate the bootstrap values, and scale bar represents the genetic distance of amino acid substitutions per site. Accession numbers of proteins are listed in Table 1. c) Molecular clock analysis of aqp10.2b paralogs in European eel. Divergence time between Elopiformes (Indo-Pacific tarpon) and Anguilliformes (European conger and European eel) species 175 Mya was used as a reference. Numbers indicate the estimated time points in Mya.
Table 1.
Aquaglyceroporins (Aqp10s) analyzed/identified in this study
| Species | Protein name in this study | Accession no. | Other name in past studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indo-pacific tarpon (Megalops cyprinoides) | Aqp10.1a | XM_036538676.1 | Aqp10aa (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Aqp10.2b | XM_036516187.1 | Aqp10bb (Yilmaz et al. 2020) | |
| Roundjaw bonefish (Albula glossodonta) | Aqp10.1a | BR002456 | Aqp10aa (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Aqp10.2b | BR002457 | Aqp10bb (Yilmaz et al. 2020) | |
| Kaup's arrowtooth eel (Synaphobranchus kaupii) | Aqp10.2b | KAJ8335135.1 (amino-acid residues 281 to 599) | Aqp10bb (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Giant moray (Gymnothorax javanicus) | Aqp10.2b | KAJ8273543.1 | Aqp10bb (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| European conger (Conger conger) | Aqp10.2b | XM_061254624.1 | Aqp10bb (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Giant mottled eel (Anguilla marmorata) | Aqp10.2b1 | BR002453 | Aqp10bb1 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Aqp10.2b2 | BR002454 (5′ end incomplete) | Aqp10bb2 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) | |
| Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) | Aqp10.2b1 | AB378503.1 | Aqp10 (Kim et al. 2010) Aqp10bb1 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Aqp10.2b2 | BR002452 | Aqp10bb2 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) | |
| American eel (Anguilla rostrata) | Aqp10.2b1 | XM_064348527.1 | Aqp10bb1 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Aqp10.2b2 | XM_064348525.1 | Aqp10bb2 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) | |
| European eel (Anguilla anguilla) | Aqp10.2b1 | XM_035428387.1 | AQPe (AJ784153) (Martinez et al. 2005b) Aqp10bb1 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
| Aqp10.2b2 | XM_035430495.1 | Aqp10bb2 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) | |
| Aqp10.2b3 | XM_035430494.1 | Aqp10bb3 (Yilmaz et al. 2020) |
Each sequence is shown in Table S3.
Yilmaz et al. reported aqp10bb1, aqp10bb2, and aqp10bb3 as paralogs of the Anguilla aqp10, we refer to them as aqp10.2b1, aqp10.2b2, and aqp10.2b3, respectively, as described in the Introduction. In this study, we have used A. rostrata EN2019 (GCA_018555375.3) genome data, registered in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Genome Data Viewer as the genome database for the American eel. This is one of the two genome datasets for the American eel and the other is A. rostrata LakeOntario-01-2011 (GCA_001606085.1). In the A. rostrata EN2019 (GCA_018555375.3) analyzed in this study, there were two aqp10.2b paralogs, aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2, that are tandemly located (Fig. 1a). In an analysis by Yilmaz et al. (2020), three aqp10 paralogs of the American eel were reported and named aqp10bb1, aqp10bb2, and aqp10bb3; however, we were unable to find the three aqp10 paralogs within the same genome database of A. rostrata. The sequences in the genome database A. rostrata LakeOntario-01-2011 (GCA_001606085.1) were too short to observe the two aqp10.2b paralogs within a single scaffold, but we were able to obtain a partial sequence corresponding to aqp10.2b1 (aqp10bb1) and one sequence corresponding to aqp10.2b2 (aqp10bb2) from the BLAST analysis of the genome data A. rostrata LakeOntario-01-2011 (GCA_001606085.1). At present, there are no data indicating the presence of three aqp10.2b paralogs within the same individual of A. rostrata. The nucleotide sequence of aqp10.2b2 in A. rostrata LakeOntario-01-2011 (GCA_001606085.1) was 98% identical to that of aqp10.2b2 in A. rostrata EN2019 (GCA_018555375.3) and 100% identical to the American eel aqp10bb2 sequence reported by Yilmaz et al. (2020). A dot plot analysis of aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3 from the European eel and aqp10.2b2 from the two American eel genomes revealed that the European eel aqp10.2b2 and the American eel aqp10.2b2 (EN2019, GCA_018555375.3) are closely related, and the European eel aqp10.2b3 and the American eel apq10.2b2 (LakeOntario-01-2011, GCA_018555375.3) appear to be closely related (Fig. S1). It is unclear at this point whether the A. rostrata has aqp10.2b2 with polymorphisms at the gene or allelic level, or if it has aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3; however, the presence of these genes has not been demonstrated in a single A. rostrata individual. Further analyses are required to resolve this issue. Yilmaz et al. (2020) also reported that A. rostrata aqp10bb1 is a pseudogene; however, this conclusion is likely based on an analysis of a partial aqp10.2b1 sequence present in the A. rostrata LakeOntario-01-2011 (GCA_001606085.1) genome data. The A. rostrata EN2019 (GCA_018555375.3) genome data contains full-length aqp10.2b1, thus suggesting that this gene is not a pseudogene.
Altered Amino Acid Residues in the ar/R Selectivity Filters of Aqp10.2b2 and b3 in Anguilla Species
Amino acid sequences of Aqp10 s in Anguilliformes, Roundjaw bonefish, and Indo-Pacific tarpons were aligned, as shown in Fig. S2. Four sites forming the ar/R selectivity filter were predicted from this alignment (Fig. 1a). The amino acid residues at positions 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the ar/R selectivity filter were conserved as F, S, A, and R, respectively, in Aqp10.1a of the Indo-Pacific tarpon and Roundjaw bonefish (Fig. 1a). The same residues were conserved as F, G, Y, and R, respectively, in Aqp10.2b of the Indo-Pacific tarpon, Roundjaw bonefish, and Anguilliformes species, and Aqp10.2b1 of Anguilla species (Fig. 1a). In contrast, they were F, G, G, and R, respectively, in Aqp10.2b2 and b3 of Anguilla species. These results suggest that the Y-to-G substitution at position 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter has occurred in Aqp10.2b2 and b3 and that the substitution may alter the solute selectivity of these Aqp10s.
Phylogenetic and Molecular Clock Analyses of the European Eel Aqp10.2b Paralogs
Next, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the amino acid sequences of Aqp10s in Anguilliformes species, Roundjaw bonefish, and Indo-Pacific tarpon (Fig. 1b). The Aqp10.2b paralogs in Anguilla species formed a single clade after separation from Aqp10.2b in the European conger, confirming that the tandem duplication of Aqp10.2b is specific to Anguilla species in Anguilliformes. Subsequently, we constructed another phylogenetic tree based on the nucleotide sequences of Aqp10s and performed molecular clock analysis to estimate the age of gene duplication using the 175 Mya divergence time between Anguilliformes and Indo-Pacific tarpon as a reference (Fig. 1c). The divergence time of aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2/b3 was estimated as 16.2 Mya, whereas that of the European eel aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3 was estimated as 3.2 Mya.
The relationships between aqp10.2b1, aqp10.2b2, and aqp10.2b3 in Anguilla species were also confirmed by dot plot analysis (Fig. S3). As these genes were located in tandem at the same chromosomal locus (Fig. 1a), the corresponding regions were compared among European, Japanese, and American eels. The region encoding aqp10.2b1 was well conserved among the three Anguilla species, thus confirming that the aqp10.2b1 genes in these species are orthologs. Additionally, the regions encoding European eel aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3 and Japanese and American eel aqp10.2b2 were well conserved, confirming that these genes are closely related.
Difference in Solute Permeabilities Between European Eel Aqp10.2b1, b2, and b3
In order to confirm whether the differences in the ar/R selectivity filter between Anguilla Aqp10.2b paralogs caused differences in solute selectivity, three European eel Aqp10.2b paralogs (Aqp10.2b1, b2, and b3) were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and their activity was then analyzed using a swelling assay. First, we analyzed the water permeability of oocytes expressing European eel Aqp10.2b1, b2, or b3. Oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b paralogs showed significant volume gain and increase in Pwater in hypoosmotic solution (Fig. 2), confirming that these Aqp10s act as water channels in the plasma membranes of oocytes.
Fig. 2.
Activities of Aqp10.2b orthologs in European eel, Kaup's arrowtooth eel, European conger, and Indo-Pacific tarpon. a) Water and solute permeabilities of AanAqp10.2b1, AanAqp10.2b2, AanAqp10.2b3, SkaAqp10.2b, CcoAqp10.2b, and McyAqp10.2b. Water (Pwater), glycerol (Pglycerol), urea (Purea), and boric acid (Pboric acid) permeabilities of oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b orthologs compared to those of control oocytes. Data were plotted using box-and-whisker plots (median: 25% to 75%ile; 1.5× interquartile). Statistical significance was assessed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Holm–Sidak post-hoc test (****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05). All samples are listed in Tables S4 and S6. b) Scatter plots and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) values for water, glycerol, urea, and boric acid permeabilities of oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b orthologs. The average water and solute permeabilities (Pwater, Pglycerol, Purea, and Pboric acid; Table S6) of oocytes expressing Aqp10.2bs are plotted in blue, whereas those of water-injected oocytes are plotted in gray. The correlations (r) calculated from the average values of Aqp10.2bs and control (n = 17 to 20) are shown with the P values in black. Aan, Anguilla anguilla; Ska, Synaphobranchus kaupii; Cco, Conger conger; Mcy, Megalops cyprinoides; A1, AanAqp10.2b1; A2, AanAqp10.2b2; A3, AanAqp10.2b3; S, SkaAqp10.2b; C, CcoAqp10.2b; M, McyAqp10.2b.
Glycerol, urea, and boric acid permeabilities of oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b paralogs were similarly analyzed using a swelling assay with an iso-osmotic solution containing the solutes. In an iso-osmotic solution containing glycerol, all oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b paralogs showed significant volume gain and increased Pglycerol (Fig. 2), indicating that these Aqp10 s are permeable to glycerol. In an iso-osmotic solution containing urea and boric acid, Aqp10.2b2 and b3, but not b1, showed significant volume gain and increased Purea and Pboric acid (Fig. 2), indicating that Aqp10.2b2 and b3, but not b1, are permeable to urea and boric acid.
In a previous study by MacIver et al. (2009), the European eel Aqpe (Aqp10.2b1) expressed in Xenopus oocytes exhibited permeability to water, glycerol, and urea. However, our swelling assay showed that the European eel Aqp10.2b1, expressed in Xenopus oocytes, has low permeability to urea. MacIver et al. performed uptake experiments using [14C]urea in solution containing 5 mM urea (2009), while a solution containing 180 mM urea was used in the swelling assay. Therefore, to analyze urea permeability at low concentrations of urea, we examined the uptake of 15N2-urea by oocytes expressing Aqp10.2 paralog. Using mass spectrometry, we detected the uptake of 15N2-urea by oocytes at the pmol/oocyte level. 15N2-urea was nearly undetectable in control oocytes, but Aqp10.2b1 oocytes took up urea, although the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 3). The oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b2 and Aqp10.2b3 absorbed more urea (Fig. 3). These results suggested that Aqp10.2b2 and Aqp10.2b3 were more permeable to urea than Aqp10.2b1 at both low and high urea concentrations.
Fig. 3.
Uptake assays for 15N-labeled urea by oocytes expressing European eel Aqp10.2b paralogs. Oocytes that express the European eel Aqp10.2bs were incubated in a solution containing 5 mM of 15N2-urea for 3 or 6 min. The amount of 15N2-urea absorbed by the oocytes was then quantified using LC–MS. Values for the 15N-labeled urea content are presented as mean ± SD and also compared to oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b paralogs and control oocytes. Statistical significances (P values) were calculated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test (****P < 0.0001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05). All samples are listed in Table S7.
Solute and Water Permeabilities of Aqp10.2b in Anguilliformes Species, other than Anguilla Species
Anguilliformes species, other than Anguilla species, have a single Aqp10.2b. Here, we analyzed the activity of Aqp10.2b in Kaup's arrowtooth eel and European conger using a swelling assay. For comparison, we analyzed Aqp10.2b in the Indo-Pacific tarpon. Oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b of these three species showed significant volume gain and increased Pwater in a hypoosmotic solution (Fig. 2), confirming that these Aqp10s act as water channels in the plasma membrane of oocytes.
In an iso-osmotic solution containing glycerol, all oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b of these three species showed significant volume gain and increased Pglycerol (Fig. 2), indicating that these Aqp10s are permeable to glycerol. In an iso-osmotic solution containing urea and boric acid, all oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b of these three species showed weak or no increase in Purea and Pboric acid (Fig. 2).
Effects of Y205G Mutation on the Urea and Boric Acid Permeabilities of European Eel Aqp10.2b1
Activity analyses of European eel Aqp10 paralogs revealed that European eel Aqp10.2b2 and b3 underwent a Y-to-G substitution at position 3 of the ar/R selectivity filter and acquired solute selectivity with high Purea and Pboric acid. Previously, we demonstrated that the sum of the molecular weights of the amino acid residues in the ar/R selectivity filter and pore size influence urea and boric acid permeabilities (Nagashima et al. 2025b). Our prior work also demonstrated that mutant of Aqp10.2bs with a Y-to-G change at position 3 had a larger pore and enabled transport of urea and boric acid. In accordance with this observation, the estimated pore radius of AanAqp10.2b2 and AanAqp10.2b3 was 1.8 Å, which is larger than the 1.4 Å estimated pore radius of AanAqp10.2b1 (Fig. 4a). Similarly, the AanAqp10.2b1 Y to G mutant at position 3 exhibited a comparatively substantial estimated pore radius of 1.7 Å (Fig. 4a). Therefore, we confirmed whether this Y-to-G substitution directly modified the solute selectivity by expressing European eel Aqp10.2b1Y205G in Xenopus oocytes and analyzing its activity.
Fig. 4.
Structural and functional characterization of European eel Aqp10.2bs. a) Model subunit structures of AnaAqp10.2b1, 10.2b2, 10.2b3, and 10.2b1Y205 and their MOLE (pore) predictions. The ar/R region residues are shown as sphere at the top (positions 1 to 4 are indicated in AanAqp10.2b1). Each ar/R selectivity region is indicated by an arrow and its pore radius is shown below it at the bottom. b) Activities of European eel Aqp10.2b1 and its mutant. Water and solute permeabilities of AanAqp10.2b1 and AanAqp10.2b1Y205G. Water (Pwater), glycerol (Pglycerol), urea (Purea), and boric acid (Pboric acid) permeabilities of oocytes expressing AanAqp10.2b1 and its mutant compared to those of control oocytes. Data were plotted using box-and-whisker plots (median: 25% to 75%ile; 1.5× interquartile). Statistical significance was assessed via one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (****P < 0.0001 and *P < 0.05). All samples are listed in Tables S5 and S6. Aan, Anguilla anguilla.
Oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b1Y205G showed significant volume gain and increased Pwater in the hypoosmotic solution (Fig. 4b), confirming that this mutant acted as a water channel in the plasma membrane of oocytes. In an iso-osmotic solution containing glycerol, urea, and boric acid, oocytes expressing Aqp10.2b1Y205G showed significant volume gain and increased Pglycerol, Purea, and Pboric acid (Fig. 4b), suggesting that the Y205G mutation increased Purea and Pboric acid of European eel Aqp10.2b1.
Tissue Distribution of Aqp10.2b1 and b2 in Japanese Eel
Martinez et al. (2005a, 2005b) analyzed the expression of European eel Aqpe (Aqp10.2b1) in the intestine and kidney using northern blotting, and Kim et al. (2010) analyzed the expression of Japanese eel Aqp10 (Aqp10.2b1) in several tissues using RT-PCR. The aqp10.2b paralogs in European eels have a high nucleotide sequence identity (96% to 99%) in the coding region, suggesting that northern analysis may not be able to distinguish between them. The RT-PCR analysis performed by Kim et al. (2010) used a set of primers that matched 100% with Japanese eel aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2. Therefore, the results of Martinez et al. (2005a, 2005b) and Kim et al. (2010) are likely to detect the total expression levels of all aqp10.2b paralogs in European and Japanese eels, respectively. To analyze the tissue distribution of aqp10.2b paralogs, we performed semiquantitative RT-PCR on various tissues of the Japanese eel that are readily available in Japan. The nucleotide sequences of the coding regions of aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2 in the Japanese eel were 97% identical, and primers could not be designed in order to distinguish between them. Therefore, a set of primers that amplify both genes was designed (Fig. 5a). Semiquantitative RT-PCR revealed the expression of aqp10.2b in the urinary bladder, posterior intestine, anterior intestine, and kidney of the Japanese eel (Fig. 5b). The PCR products derived from aqp10.2b1 contained NcoI sites, whereas those derived from aqp10.2b2 contained BglI sites (Fig. 5a). Therefore, the PCR products were digested with NcoI and BglI and analyzed by electrophoresis. Digestion products derived solely from aqp10.2b1 were detected in the urinary bladder, posterior intestine, and anterior intestine, whereas digestion products derived from both aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2 were detected in the kidneys (Fig. 5c). Direct sequencing of the PCR products revealed that the sequence derived from aqp10.2b1 was present in the PCR products derived from the urinary bladder, posterior intestine, and anterior intestine, whereas both aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2 sequences were detected in the PCR products derived from the kidney (Fig. 5d). These results indicate that the urinary bladder, posterior intestine, and anterior intestine of the Japanese eel express only aqp10.2b1, whereas the kidney expresses both aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2.
Fig. 5.
Tissue distribution of aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2 in Japanese eel. a) Primer design for Japanese eel aqp10. Schematic representation of the positions of the two aqp10 cDNA paralogs in Japanese eel are shown with the primers used for the RT-PCR. The primers (arrows) were designed within the conserved region between the two aqp10 cDNA paralogs to amplify both. The PCR products include paralog-specific restriction enzyme sequences, NcoI and BglI (arrowheads). Numbers indicate the size in base pairs (bp) of the PCR products with or without restriction enzyme digestion. b) Tissue distribution of apq10 paralogs in Japanese eel reared in fresh water. PCR products were analyzed by a microchip electrophoresis without restriction enzyme digestion. The generation of pseudo-gel images of the PCR products was facilitated by the microchip electrophoresis system, and the β-actin gene (actb) was utilized as an internal control. The whole images of the gels are shown in Fig. S6. c) Expression of apq10 paralogs in freshwater-reared Japanese eels. PCR products were digested with NcoI and BglI and then similarly analyzed by microchip electrophoresis. d) Direct sequencing of the PCR products. The PCR products derived from the urinary bladder, anterior intestine, posterior intestine, and kidney of Japanese eel shown in (b) were analyzed by direct sequencing.
Relatively Rapid Nonsynonymous Substitution (dN) Rates in Anguilla aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3
Activity analyses results of European eel Aqp10 paralogs revealed that the function of European eel Aqp10.2b1 is similar to that of Aqp10.2b in other Anguilliformes species, and is similar to the typical activity of Aqp10.2s in ray-finned fishes (Imaizumi et al. 2024), whereas Aqp10.2b2 and b3 acquired new functions after tandem duplication of the genes encoding these proteins. We hypothesized that the dN rates in aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3 may be altered compared to that in aqp10.2b1. To calculate the dN and synonymous substitution (dS) rates, we analyzed the nucleotide sequences of aqp10.2b paralogs in four Anguilla species: giant mottled, Japanese, American, and European eels. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the alignment of the nucleotide sequences, as shown in Fig. 6. The Anguilla Aqp10.2b paralogs with Y at position 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter and those with G at the same position formed two different clades, which are indicated as groups 1 (Gp1) and 2 (Gp2), respectively, as shown in Fig. 6. Using this alignment, we constructed the most probable sequences for the root of Anguilla Aqp10 s as ancestral sequences, N20 in Fig. 6. The amino acid residue at position 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter of the estimated ancestral sequence, N20, was Y. These results suggest that in the ancestral Anguilla species, one of the tandem duplicates of aqp10.2b underwent a Y-to-G substitution, which is conserved in aqp10.2b paralogs in Gp2 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Rapid evolution of Aqp10.2b2 and Aqp10.2b3 in eels. Phylogenetic analyses of the nucleotide sequences of Aqp10s in Elopomorpha species. Numbers indicate the bootstrap values, and scale bar represents the genetic distance of nucleotide substitutions per site. Average Jukes–Cantor (JC) distances of Aqp10-coding regions within the same or among different groups are shown in the phylogenetic tree. Variants were estimated using the bootstrap method with 500 replicates. Nucleotide sequences used for analysis are shown in Fig. S5. dN, nonsynonymous substitutions per site; dS, synonymous substitutions per site.
dN and dS were calculated for N20, Gp1, and Gp2 based on the Nei–Gojobori (NG) method (Nei and Gojobori 1986), and the results are shown in Fig. 6. The dN between N20 and Gp2 was 0.030, which was approximately nine times higher than that between N20 and Gp1 (0.0034). dS between N20 and Gp2 was 0.055, which was not significantly different from that between N20 and Gp1 (0.058). The dN/dS ratio between N20 and Gp2 was 0.51, whereas that between N20 and Gp1 was 0.06. These results indicated high dN values in Aqp10.2b2 and Aqp10.2b3 of Anguilla species.
Discussion
The common ancestor of ray-finned fish acquired an additional aqp10 paralog through tandem duplication (Yilmaz et al. 2020). Owing to amino acid substitutions, these paralogs have diversified in solute permeability, resulting in two main types: one with broad solute permeability and the other with glycerol-specific permeability (Imaizumi et al. 2024). As most teleosts retain at least one ortholog from each of these ancient paralogs, the functional diversity in aqp10 appears to be crucial for their physiology. These genes make excellent models for studying gene duplication and neo-subfunctionalization. Notably, Anguilla species have a unique evolutionary history for these genes. Their common ancestor lost all aqp10.1-derived paralogs; however, new paralogs have been reacquired within the Anguilla species through recent tandem duplications of aqp10.2b. In the present study, we investigated these newly duplicated genes. By comparing the amino acid sequences and solute permeabilities of the three Aqp10.2b paralogs in European eels, we found that the eels have reacquired an aqp10 paralog with broad solute selectivity (aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3). This compensated for the ancestral loss of the Aqp10.1-derived broad permeability through recent gene duplications (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
Proposed timeline of the loss and gain of Aqp10 paralogs with broad solute selectivity in Anguilla species. A schematic representation of the evolutionary history leading to the identification of aqp10 paralogs in European eel compared with that in other Anguilla species, European conger, Kaup's arrowtooth eel, and Indo-Pacific tarpon, is shown. The names of extant species are indicated. The analyzed and estimated solute selectivities of the protein product of each gene are shown on white (broad solute selectivity) or gray (narrow solute selectivity) backgrounds.
Analysis of the amino acid sequences of eel Aqp10.2b paralogs revealed that one of the four amino acid residues forming the ar/R selectivity filter was substituted from Y to G in two of three European eel paralogs. Previous studies have reported that the two aromatic amino acid residues at positions 1 and 3 of the four sites forming the ar/R selectivity filter are important for reducing urea and boric acid permeability, but not for glycerol permeability, in Aqp10 (Nagashima et al. 2025b). Aromatic amino acid residues have relatively large molecular weights, and the two aromatic amino acid residues in the ar/R selectivity filter reduce the pore size, limiting the transport of solutes. The results of the activity analysis and structural modeling showed that the European eel Aqp10.2b paralog with Y at position 3 in the ar/R selectivity filter, Aqp10.2b1, exhibited narrow transport solute selectivity and possessed an relatively small estimated pore radius similar to those of other Aqp10.2s, whereas the Y-to G-substituted paralogs, Aqp10.2b2 and b3, exhibited high urea and boric acid transport activity and possessed a relatively large estimated pore radius similar to that of Aqp10.1s. These findings imply that recent gene duplication in ancestral Anguilla species resulted in the acquisition of an Aqp10 paralog with broad solute selectivity, similar to the previously lost Aqp10.1.
Analysis of the substitution rates of aqp10 in Anguilliformes showed a relatively low dN/dS ratio of ∼0.06 between the estimated ancestral Anguilla aqp10.2b sequence N20 and Anguilla aqp10.2b1. In contrast, the dN/dS ratio between N20 and Anguilla aqp10.2b paralogs with high urea and boric acid permeability (eg European eel aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3) was ∼0.5. In general, adaptive evolution is indicated by a dN/dS ratio greater than 1. In the present study, the dN/dS ratio of ∼0.5, in the Anguilla aqp10.2b2 and aqp10.2b3, was less than 1, but this can be considered as a result of simultaneously observing the purifying selection of amino acid residues that contribute to the structure essential for channel formation and adaptive selection that altered transport solute selectivity.
In this study, we clarified that Anguilla species reacquired a type of Aqp10 with broad transport substrate selectivity, which they had previously lost. However, this result raises a new question. Given that other Anguilliformes lineages, such as Kaup's arrowtooth eel and the European conger, appear to survive well without these aqp10 paralogs, what selective advantage do these duplications confer on Anguilla species? Most ray-finned fish species typically possess at least one gene derived from both aqp10.1 and aqp10.2 (Yilmaz et al. 2020), but the order Anguilliformes is a rare exceptions to this rule. Although it is plausible that other aquaglyceroporins compensate for the transport functions of lost aqp10.1 paralogs in other anguilliform species, the specific benefits of these duplications in Anguilla remain unclear. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that possessing extra Aqp10 paralogs offers an evolutionary advantage by enabling the precise regulation of transport pathways through altered expression or functional differentiation. Further research is needed to determine these advantages and their physiological implications precisely.
Mammalian Aqp10 is thought to contribute to glycerol transport in intestinal epithelial cells and adipocytes (Mobasheri et al. 2004; Gotfryd et al. 2018). In teleost fish, the primary expression site of aqp10 is the intestine, as demonstrated in both European and Japanese eels (Martinez et al. 2005a; Kim et al. 2010), zebrafish (Tingaud-Sequeira et al. 2010), Atlantic salmon (Tipsmark et al. 2010), and Japanese pufferfish (Kumagai et al. 2023), suggesting that one of the primary roles of fish Aqp10 is the transport of water and solutes in the intestine (Takei 2021). The intestines of zebrafish and Japanese pufferfish express both aqp10.1a and aqp10.2b (Tingaud-Sequeira et al. 2010; Kumagai et al. 2023). In the Japanese eel, this study demonstrated that the intestine expresses only one aqp10 paralog, aqp10.2b1, which may be considered a characteristic of the Anguilliformes. The role of Aqp10 in freshwater and seawater acclimation remains unclear (Madsen et al. 2015; Takei 2021). Aqp10 expression in the kidney has been observed in zebrafish (Tingaud-Sequeira et al. 2010) and European eels (Martinez et al. 2005a), and was also observed in Japanese eels in this study. Unlike other organs, the kidneys of the Japanese eel express both aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2. Currently, the kidney of the Japanese eel is the only organ in which aqp10.2b2 expression has been confirmed in Anguilla species. Thus, Aqp10.2b1 and Aqp10.2b2 are important targets for the physiological analysis of functional differentiation.
Yilmaz et al. (2020) revealed that tandem duplication of aqp genes occurred many times at various ages during vertebrate evolution and diversification. The major ones include the tandem duplication of aqp9/13-like in Hyperoartia, aqp3 and aqp10 in cartilaginous fishes, aqp10 in ray-finned fishes, aqp3b in Gadidae teleosts, aqp3a in Cichlidae teleosts, aqp10.2b in Anguillidae teleosts, aqp10.1a in Cyprinodontiformes teleosts, aqp7 in Homininae, aqp10 in select amphibian, reptile, and avian lineages. However, physiological significance of these tandem duplications remains unclear. Based on the findings of our previous report, we analyzed aqp10 paralogs in ray-finned fish and showed that their biochemical activity can be estimated using the four amino acid residues forming the ar/R selectivity filter (Nagashima et al. 2025b). Our approach can help in predicting the activity and solute selectivity of aquaglyceroporins of other species using the four amino acid residues forming the ar/R selectivity filter estimated from the genomic data of various species.
Materials and Methods
Synteny and Phylogenetic Analyses
The presence and number of aqp10.1 and aqp10.2 orthologs were determined via synteny analysis. Genome databases of Elopomorpha species, Indo-pacific tarpon (Megalops cyprinoides; GCA_013368585.1), roundjaw bonefish (Albula glossodonta; GCA_019788955.1) (Pickett et al. 2022), Kaup's arrowtooth eel (Synaphobranchus kaupii; GCA_029718625.1) (Parey et al. 2023), giant moray (Gymnothorax javanicus; GCA_029692085.1) (Parey et al. 2023), European conger (Conger conger; GCA_963514075.1) (Parey et al. 2023), Japanese eel (A. japonica; GCA_025169545.1) (Wang et al. 2022), American eel (A. rostrata; GCA_018555375.3) (Pavey et al. 2017), and European eel (A. Anguilla; GCA_013347855.1) (Henkel et al. 2012), were browsed using the Ensembl genome browser (https://www.ensembl.org) (Martin et al. 2023) and National Center for Biotechnology Information genome data viewer (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/gdv/) (Rangwala et al. 2021). The aqp10.1 and aqp10.2 loci were manually examined. Accession numbers of all genes are listed in Table S1. The aqp10.2 orthologs in giant mottled eel (A. marmorata; GCA_901111315.1) (Barth et al. 2020) were identified via tBLASTn analysis using the genome database.
The amino acid sequences and accession numbers of the Aqp10s of Elopomorpha species were collected from the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ or Ensembl genome browsers (Table 1). Giant mottled eels Aqp10.2b1 and b2 and Japanese eel Aqp10.2b2 were not annotated; thus, they were manually annotated and registered as third-party annotations (TPA) in the DDBJ (accession numbers: BR002453, BR002454, and BR002452, respectively). We also manually annotated the roundjaws Aqp10.1a and Aqp10.2b and registered them as TPA to the DDBJ (BR002456 and BR002457, respectively). The amino acid sequences were aligned with ClustalW software (Chenna et al. 2003) and ESPript (Robert and Gouet 2014) was used to produce graphical display of the results. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method and the JTT matrix-based model (Jones et al. 1992). The tree with the highest log likelihood (−2,830.67) is shown. The percentages of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered together are shown below the branches. The initial trees for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying the Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the JTT model and selecting the topology with a superior log likelihood value. The tree was drawn to scale with branch lengths measured as the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 10 amino acid sequences. The final dataset contained 332 positions. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA11 software (Tamura et al. 2021).
Dot Plot Analysis
aqp10 loci were compared among European, Japanese, and American eels via dot plot analysis using the EMBOSS dotmatcher program (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher/emboss) (Madeira et al. 2024) with a window size of 20 and a threshold score of 70. All analyzed genomic regions are presented in Table S2.
Molecular Clock Analysis
All nucleotide sequences encoding Aqp10s listed in Table 1 and Table S3 were aligned with those of using ClustalW software (Chenna et al. 2003), and sites containing gaps were deleted manually without shifting the reading frame (Fig. S4). A time tree was generated using multiple alignment data and the RelTime method (Tamura et al. 2012). Divergence time points for all branching points in the topology were calculated using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model (Tamura and Nei 1993). The estimated log likelihood value of the topology shown was –3,644.82. The tree was drawn to scale with branch lengths measured as the relative number of substitutions per site. Six nucleotide sequences were analyzed. The final dataset contained 976 positions. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA11 software.
Expression Vector Construction and Site-Directed Mutagenesis
Full-length cDNAs with 15-bp sequences complementary to the ends of the linearized pGEMHE of Aqp10s from the European eel, Kaup's arrowtooth eel, European conger, and Indo-Pacific tarpon and a site-directed mutagenesis sequence (AanAqp10.2b1Y205G) were chemically synthesized (Eurofins Genomics, Tokyo, Japan), as previously described (Imaizumi et al. 2024; Nagashima et al. 2025b). The cDNAs were subcloned into pGEMHE (Liman et al. 1992) using the NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and sequenced.
Expression of Aqp10 in Xenopus Oocytes
Plasmids were linearized with NotI (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), and capped RNAs (cRNAs) were transcribed in vitro using the T7 Message Machine kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Xenopus laevis oocytes were dissociated with collagenase, as previously described (Romero et al. 1998), and injected with 50 nL of water or a solution containing 0.5 ng/nL cRNA (25 ng/oocyte) using the Nanoject-II injector (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, PA, USA). Oocytes were incubated in the OR3 medium at 16 °C and observed for 4 to 5 d after injection. The OR3 medium (1 L) consisted of 0.7% w/v powdered Leibovitz L-15 medium with L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 50 mL of 10,000 U penicillin, 10,000 U streptomycin solution in 0.9% NaCl (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan), and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.50) (Romero et al. 1998). Osmolality was adjusted to 200 mOsmol/kg using NaCl powder. All animal protocols and procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Experiment Committee of the Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Xenopus Oocyte Swelling Assay
Oocyte swelling was monitored using a stereomicroscope (SZX9; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a charge-coupled device camera (DS-Fi2; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described (Ushio et al. 2022; Kumagai et al. 2023; Imaizumi et al. 2024). The oocyte volume was calculated assuming a spherical geometry. Oocytes incubated with ND96 (approximately 200 mOsmol/kg) were transferred to 2-fold diluted ND96 (approximately 100 mOsmol/kg) for water transport assays. For glycerol, urea, and boric acid transport assays, oocytes were transferred to an isotonic solution containing ND96 supplemented with 180 mM glycerol, urea, or boric acid instead of NaCl and adjusted to an osmolality of approximately 200 mOsmol/kg. Water permeability (Pwater) was calculated from the osmotic swelling data and the molar volume of water (Vw = 18 cm3/mol) as follows (Preston et al. 1992): Pwater = [Vo × d(V/Vo)/dt]/[S × Vw × (osmin − osmout)], where S is the initial oocyte surface area. Solute permeability (Psolute) was calculated from the swelling data, total osmolality of the system (osmtotal = 200 mOsmol/kg), and solute gradient (solout − solin) as follows (Carbrey et al. 2003): Psolute = osmtotal × [Vo × d(V/Vo)/dt]/[S × (solout − solin)]. The water, glycerol, urea, and boric acid transport activities of each Aqp10 strain were evaluated using oocytes from the same animal, and the experiment was repeated using at least three frogs. The list of plot data is shown in Tables S4 and S5. Quantitative data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation in Table S6. Pwater and Psolute values were compared between the Aqp10-expressing and control oocytes, and statistical significance was assessed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Holm–Sidak test or Tukey's test using GraphPad Prism software (version 8; GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) to visualize the results in box plots.
Uptake Assays for 15N-labeled Urea by Oocyte Expressing aqp10
Oocytes expressing European eel Aqp10.2b paralogues or control oocytes injected with water were placed in ND96 medium containing 5 mM 15N-labeled urea (15N2-urea; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Each oocyte was washed twice with ND96 and the wash solution was removed after 10 oocytes were collected in a tube. To frozen Xenopus oocytes 500 μL methanol containing 50 μM morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES) and 100 μM methionine sulfone were added as internal standards, then this was homogenized with BioMasher II and 250 μL ultrapure water was added. To 600 μL of the suspension, 400 μL of chloroform was added, mixed and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The 450 μL supernatant was collected and concentrated by centrifugation for 30 min. To this sample, 300 μL of ultrapure water was added and ultrafiltrated with Amicon Ultra 3k (Merk Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and all the filtrate was collected. The samples were frozen at −80 °C for approximately 15 min, lyophilized for 6 h, and dissolved in 66 μL of ultrapure water for liquid chromatography (LC)–Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis.
The list of plot data is shown in Table S7. Quantitative data for oocytes from at least three frogs are presented as mean ± SD. Values for 15N-labeled urea content were compared between oocytes expressing European eel Aqp10.2bs and control oocytes. Statistical significance (P values) was calculated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test using GraphPad Prism software (version 8; GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) to visualize the results in bar plots.
Chromatographic Conditions for Liquid Chromatography Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry System
An LC-triple quadrupole MS system (LCMS-8030; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used for 15N-urea quantification after extraction. 15N-urea was separated on a PFPP column (Discovery HS F5, 2.1 mm I.D. × 150 mm L, 3 μm; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid were used as mobile phases. The gradient was programmed to hold at 0% B for the first 2 min, rise from 0% to 25% B for 3 min, from 25% to 35% B for 6 min, from 35% to 95% B for 4 min, and finally held at 95% B for 5 min at a flow rate of 250 μL/min. Fragments were detected by electrospray ionization in the positive ion mode. Mass spectra (63.00 > 19.05 m/z) were obtained in MRM scan modes. Data were acquired and analyzed using the LabSolutions software (Shimadzu).
Structural Modeling of AanAqp10s
For the pore analysis, structural models of AnaAqp10.2b1, 10.2b2, 10.2b3 and 10.2b1Y205G were first generated using the AlphaFold 3 server (Abramson et al. 2024). Then, according to previous studies (Ushio et al. 2022; Nagashima et al. 2025b), pore analysis was performed on the TMD core part (residues 14 to 261) of each model structure using MOLE online (Pravda et al. 2018).
Semiquantitative RT-PCR and Sequence Analysis
Total RNA from freshwater-acclimated Japanese eels (Nakada et al. 2005) was used in this study. First-strand complementary DNA was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with oligo(dT) primers. The samples were then analyzed by RT-PCR, as previously described (Tran et al. 2006; Motoshima et al. 2023) using GoTaq Green Master Mix (2×; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and a set of primers: 5′-ccgagtgtttgggagtctacgtcttg-3′ and 5′-tagagccagtttgttgtccacggtt-3′. These primers were designed to amplify Japanese eel aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2. β-Actin (actb) was similarly analyzed as an internal control using a set of primers: 5′-ccttcctgggtatggagtcctg-3′ and 5′-cggagtatttgcgctcaggtg-3′ (Wong et al. 2016).
The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; 33 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s (denaturation); 52 °C for 30 s (annealing); 72 °C for 1 min (extension); and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Five microliter of the PCR mixture was two times diluted and loaded onto a microchip electrophoresis system for DNA/RNA analysis (MCE-202 MultiNA, Shimadzu) using a DNA-2500 reagent kit (Shimadzu) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Electrophoresis results were analyzed using MultiNA Viewer software (Shimadzu).
The PCR products of Japanese eel aqp10 cDNA were purified using the Fast Gene Gel/PCR extraction kit (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan) and sequenced directly with one of the primers used for aqp10 cDNA amplification using a Big Dye Terminator ver3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence data were visualized using the MEGA11 software.
Restriction Enzyme Digestion of PCR Products Derived From Japanese Eel aqp10.2b1 and aqp10.2b2 cDNAs
Under the same aforementioned conditions, 25 μL of the 38-cycle PCR products of Japanese eel aqp10 cDNA were purified using the Fast Gene Gel/PCR extraction kit (Nippon Genetics). The eluates were digested with 15 U NcoI (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) and 12 U BglI (Nippon Gene) in the H buffer at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by re-purification using the Fast Gene Gel/PCR extraction kit. Aliquots (5 μL) of the eluates were diluted 2-fold and analyzed using the microchip electrophoresis system and DNA-2500 reagent kit as described above.
Calculation of the Nucleotide Substitution Rate
Protein coding sequences of Aqp10s listed in Table 1 were aligned with those of using ClustalW software (Chenna et al. 2003), and the sites containing gaps were deleted manually without shifting the reading frame as described above.
Ancestral states were inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method (Nei and Kumar 2000) and Tamura–Nei model (Tamura and Nei 1993). The tree shows a set of possible nucleotides (states) at each ancestral node based on their inferred likelihood at Site 1. The rates among the sites were treated as uniform (uniform rate option). The analysis included 12 nucleotide sequences. The final dataset contained 603 positions. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA11 software.
Protein-coding sequences of Aqp10s listed in Table 1 were aligned with those of predicted ancestral sequences using ClustalW software (Fig. S5), sites containing gaps were manually deleted without shifting the reading frame, and the alignment was used to calculate the nucleotide substitution rates.
The mean distance values between groups for dN and dS were calculated based on the NG method (Nei and Gojobori 1986) using an alignment composed of 13 sequences and 522 positions with the MEGA11 software. Standard errors were computed using the bootstrap method with 500 replicates.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Nodoka Nagai, Yoko Yamamoto, Nana Shinohara, the Integrative Bioscience Facility, and the Open Research Facilities for Life Science and Technology at the Institute of Science Tokyo for their technical assistance. We also thank Tomomi Ueda of the Department of Food and Physiological Models, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo for technical support. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, grant numbers 21H02281 (to A.K.) and 21K14781 (to A.N.), Lotte Research Promotion Grant (to A.N.), Institute of Science Tokyo Challenging Research Award (to A.N.), and Temporary Assistant Program by the Support for Work-Life Balance, DEI Section, Office of Communications and DEI, Institute of Science Tokyo (to A.N.).
Contributor Information
Ayumi Nagashima, School of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan; School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan.
Shinichiro Hidaka, School of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan; School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan.
Chihiro Ota, School of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan; School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan.
Daisuke Yamanaka, Department of Food and Physiological Models, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kasama, Ibaraki 319-0206, Japan; Y's Data Science Co., Ltd., Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Koichi Ito, Department of Food and Physiological Models, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kasama, Ibaraki 319-0206, Japan.
Tsutomu Nakada, Division of Instrumental Analysis, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Tadaomi Furuta, School of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan; School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan.
Akira Kato, School of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan; School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material is available at Genome Biology and Evolution online.
Author Contributions
A.N. and A.K. conceived and designed the study, interpreted the experimental results, and drafted and edited the manuscript. A.N., S.H., C.O., D.Y., K.I., T.N., T.F., and A.K. performed the experiments. A.N., S.H., C.O., D.Y., T.F., and A.K. analyzed the data. A.N., S.H., C.O., D.Y., K.I., T.N., T.F., and A.K. approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data Availability
Data generated/analyzed in this study are available in this article and Supplementary Materials. All identified sequences have been deposited into GenBank under the accession numbers BR002452 to BR002454 and BR002456 to BR002457 as indicated in Materials and Methods section.
Literature Cited
- Abramson J et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024:630:493–500. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agre P et al. Aquaporin water channels–from atomic structure to clinical medicine. J Physiol. 2002:542:3–16. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.020818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barth JMI et al. Stable species boundaries despite ten million years of hybridization in tropical eels. Nat Commun. 2020:11:1433. 10.1038/s41467-020-15099-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbrey JM et al. Aquaglyceroporin AQP9: solute permeation and metabolic control of expression in liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003:100:2945–2950. 10.1073/pnas.0437994100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chenna R et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003:31:3497–3500. 10.1093/nar/gkg500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engelund MB et al. Differential expression and novel permeability properties of three aquaporin 8 paralogs from seawater-challenged Atlantic Salmon smolts. J Exp Biol. 2013:216:3873–3885. 10.1242/jeb.087890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eriksson UK et al. Subangstrom resolution X-ray structure details aquaporin-water interactions. Science. 2013:340:1346–1349. 10.1126/science.1234306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finn RN, Cerda J. Evolution and functional diversity of aquaporins. Biol Bull. 2015:229:6–23. 10.1086/BBLv229n1p6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finn RN, Chauvigne F, Hlidberg JB, Cutler CP, Cerda J. The lineage-specific evolution of aquaporin gene clusters facilitated tetrapod terrestrial adaptation. PLoS One. 2014:9:e113686. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glasauer SM, Neuhauss SC. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol Genet Genomics. 2014:289:1045–1060. 10.1007/s00438-014-0889-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gotfryd K et al. Human adipose glycerol flux is regulated by a pH gate in AQP10. Nat Commun. 2018:9:4749. 10.1038/s41467-018-07176-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henkel CV et al. Primitive duplicate Hox clusters in the European eel's genome. PLoS One. 2012:7:e32231. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hub JS, de Groot BL. Mechanism of selectivity in aquaporins and aquaglyceroporins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008:105:1198–1203. 10.1073/pnas.0707662104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imaizumi G et al. Functional divergence in solute permeability between ray-finned fish-specific paralogs of aqp10. Genome Biol Evol. 2024:16:evad221. 16:10.1093/gbe/evad221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992:8:275–282. 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim YK et al. Expression of aquaporins 3, 8 and 10 in the intestines of freshwater- and seawater-acclimated Japanese eels Anguilla japonica. Fish Sci. 2010:76:695–702. 10.1007/s12562-010-0259-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kitchen P et al. Water channel pore size determines exclusion properties but not solute selectivity. Sci Rep. 2019:9:20369. 10.1038/s41598-019-56814-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozai D et al. Narrowed pore conformations of aquaglyceroporins AQP3 and GlpF. Nat Commun. 2025:16:2653. 10.1038/s41467-025-57728-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreida S, Törnroth-Horsefield S. Structural insights into aquaporin selectivity and regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015:33:126–134. 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumagai S et al. Boric acid transport activity of marine teleost aquaporins expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Physiol Rep. 2023:11:e15655. 10.14814/phy2.15655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Hedges SB. TimeTree: a resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol Biol Evol. 2017:34:1812–1819. 10.1093/molbev/msx116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liman ER, Tytgat J, Hess P. Subunit stoichiometry of a mammalian K+ channel determined by construction of multimeric cDNAs. Neuron. 1992:9:861–871. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90239-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Login FH, Nejsum LN. Aquaporin water channels: roles beyond renal water handling. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023:19:604–618. 10.1038/s41581-023-00734-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maclver B et al. Expression and functional characterization of four aquaporin water channels from the European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Journal of Experimental Biology. 2009:212:2856–2863. 10.1242/jeb.025882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madeira F et al. The EMBL-EBI job dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024:52:W521–W525. 10.1093/nar/gkae241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madsen SS, Engelund MB, Cutler CP. Water transport and functional dynamics of aquaporins in osmoregulatory organs of fishes. Biol Bull. 2015:229:70–92. 10.1086/BBLv229n1p70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin FJ et al. Ensembl 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023:51:D933–D941. 10.1093/nar/gkac958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez AS et al. Cloning and expression of three aquaporin homologues from the European eel (Anguilla anguilla): effects of seawater acclimation and cortisol treatment on renal expression. Biol Cell. 2005a:97:615–627. 10.1042/BC20040111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez AS et al. Regulation of expression of two aquaporin homologs in the intestine of the European eel: effects of seawater acclimation and cortisol treatment. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005b:288:R1733–R1743. 10.1152/ajpregu.00747.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mobasheri A, Shakibaei M, Marples D. Immunohistochemical localization of aquaporin 10 in the apical membranes of the human ileum: a potential pathway for luminal water and small solute absorption. Histochem Cell Biol. 2004:121:463–471. 10.1007/s00418-004-0657-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morinaga T, Nakakoshi M, Hirao A, Imai M, Ishibashi K. Mouse aquaporin 10 gene (AQP10) is a pseudogene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002:294:630–634. 10.1016/S0006-291x(02)00536-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motoshima T et al. Na+/Cl− cotransporter 2 is not fish-specific and is widely found in amphibians, non-avian reptiles, and select mammals. Physiol Genomics. 2023:55:113–131. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00143.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagashima A et al. Aquaporin 10 paralogs exhibit evolutionarily altered urea and boric acid permeabilities based on the amino acid residues at positions 1 and 3 in the ar/R region. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2025b:329:R423–R436. 10.1152/ajpregu.00212.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagashima A, Nagai N, Ota C, Ushio K, Kato A. Retention and pseudogenization of aquaporin-10 in Rodentia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025a:756:151608. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakada T et al. Roles of Slc13a1 and Slc26a1 sulfate transporters of eel kidney in sulfate homeostasis and osmoregulation in freshwater. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005:289:R575–R585. 10.1152/ajpregu.00725.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M, Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986:3:418–426. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Parey E et al. Genome structures resolve the early diversification of teleost fishes. Science. 2023:379:572–575. 10.1126/science.abq4257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pavey SA et al. Draft genome of the American Eel (Anguilla rostrata). Mol Ecol Resour. 2017:17:806–811. 10.1111/1755-0998.12608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickett BD et al. Genome assembly of the roundjaw bonefish (Albula glossodonta), a vulnerable circumtropical sportfish. GigaByte. 2022:2022:1–29. 10.46471/gigabyte.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pravda L et al. MOLEonline: a web-based tool for analyzing channels, tunnels and pores (2018 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018:46:W368–W373. 10.1093/nar/gky309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Preston GM, Carroll TP, Guggino WB, Agre P. Appearance of water channels in Xenopus oocytes expressing red cell CHIP28 protein. Science. 1992:256:385–387. 10.1126/science.256.5055.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rangwala SH et al. Accessing NCBI data using the NCBI sequence viewer and Genome Data Viewer (GDV). Genome Res. 2021:31:159–169. 10.1101/gr.266932.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravi V, Venkatesh B. The divergent genomes of teleosts. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2018:6:47–68. 10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robert X, Gouet P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014:42:W320–W324. 10.1093/nar/gku316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romero MF, Fong P, Berger UV, Hediger MA, Boron WF. Cloning and functional expression of rNBC, an electrogenic Na+-HCO3− cotransporter from rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1998:274:F425–F432. 10.1152/ajprenal.1998.274.2.F425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takei Y. The digestive tract as an essential organ for water acquisition in marine teleosts: lessons from euryhaline eels. Zoological Lett. 2021:7:10. 10.1186/s40851-021-00175-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K et al. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012:109:19333–19338. 10.1073/pnas.1213199109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial-DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993:10:512–526. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11 molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021:38:3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka Y, Morishita Y, Ishibashi K. Aquaporin10 is a pseudogene in cattle and their relatives. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2015:1:16–21. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tingaud-Sequeira A et al. The zebrafish genome encodes the largest vertebrate repertoire of functional aquaporins with dual paralogy and substrate specificities similar to mammals. BMC Evol Biol. 2010:10:38. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tipsmark CK, Sorensen KJ, Madsen SS. Aquaporin expression dynamics in osmoregulatory tissues of Atlantic Salmon during smoltification and seawater acclimation. J Exp Biol. 2010:213:368–379. 10.1242/jeb.034785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran YH et al. Spliced isoforms of LIM-domain-binding protein (CLIM/NLI/Ldb) lacking the LIM-interaction domain. J Biochem. 2006:140:105–119. 10.1093/jb/mvj134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ushio K et al. Boric acid transport activity of human aquaporins expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Physiol Rep. 2022:10:e15164. 10.14814/phy2.15164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H et al. A chromosome-level assembly of the Japanese eel genome, insights into gene duplication and chromosomal reorganization. Gigascience. 2022:11:giac120. 10.1093/gigascience/giac120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong MK, Pipil S, Kato A, Takei Y. Duplicated CFTR isoforms in eels diverged in regulatory structures and osmoregulatory functions. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2016:199:130–141. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yilmaz O et al. Unravelling the complex duplication history of deuterostome glycerol transporters. Cells. 2020:9:663. 10.3390/cells9071663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data generated/analyzed in this study are available in this article and Supplementary Materials. All identified sequences have been deposited into GenBank under the accession numbers BR002452 to BR002454 and BR002456 to BR002457 as indicated in Materials and Methods section.







