Skip to main content
BMC Veterinary Research logoLink to BMC Veterinary Research
. 2025 Oct 2;21:559. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04980-w

Fusion membrane proteins derived subunit vaccine candidates effectively protect against Mycoplasma bovis challenge in mice

Yong Xuan Wang 1,2, Hong Song Cheng 1,2, Jun Yue 3, Qian Hu 1,2, Shuai Bo Han 1,2, Ying Fen Li 1,2, Yu Jie Chen 1, Er Peng Zhu 1,2,, Zhen Tao Cheng 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12492813  PMID: 41039518

Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is the causative agent of bovine mycoplasmosis, a disease that can lead to respiratory issues, otitis media, mastitis, and arthritis in cattle and causes huge economic losses to the cattle breeding industry. Although vaccination represents the most effective method for the prevention of M. bovis, there is a lack of commercially available subunit vaccines that are effective against this disease. Here, we developed several subunit vaccine candidates using different combinations of membrane proteins M27, M32, M498, and M663 derived from a M. bovis strain isolated in Guizhou Province, China. Subsequently, the immune efficacy of the subunit vaccine candidates was evaluated in mice through immunization and challenge experiments. The results showed that the M. bovis subunit vaccines constructed from different protein fusions (M27-32, M27-498, M27-663, M27-32–498, M27-32–663, M27-498–663, and M27-32–498-663) were capable of eliciting the secretion of specific antibodies in mice. Furthermore, these candidates also induced robust TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6 in the serum of mice, suggesting the induction of Th1- and Th2-type immune responses. Microscopically, these M. bovis subunit vaccine candidates were also effective in reducing lung tissue damage caused by M. bovis infection, suggesting that they provide good protection against challenge with virulent M. bovis. Among the tested vaccine candidates, the M27-498–663 and the M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine candidates demonstrated the most robust immune efficacy, laying the foundation for the effective control of M. bovis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-025-04980-w.

Keywords: Mycoplasma bovis, Subunit vaccine, Immune efficacy, Membrane proteins

Background

Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) was first isolated from sick cows with mastitis in the United States in 1961 [1]. In China, the first isolation of M. bovis from the lungs of calves with pneumonia was reported in 2008 [2]. Infection with M. bovis can manifest in a number of ways, including mastitis, pneumonia, arthritis, keratoconjunctivitis, otitis media, and genital disorders that may result in infertility and abortion [3]. Therefore, M. bovis represents a significant threat to cattle health and productivity, with a global prevalence that has resulted in considerable economic losses for the cattle industry [4].

The membrane proteins on the surface of the Mycoplasma cell membrane play a crucial role in the invasion process, due to the absence of cell walls. The latest research indicates that M. bovis primarily disrupts the function of membrane surface receptors on host cells by secreting inflammatory chemicals and activating inflammatory signaling pathways through membrane protein cilia. Such an interaction may result in damage to the host cell membrane and, in some cases, may even lead to apoptosis [5]. A genomic cluster of variable surface lipoproteins (Vsp) genes (VspA, VspB, VspC, VspF, VspO, and VspL) mediated high-frequency phenotypic switching of surface lipoprotein antigens in the bovine pathogen M. bovis. This alteration serves to enhance the ability of the organism to colonize, attach to, and evade host immune defenses. These membrane proteins are highly immunogenic and induce mucosal immunity [6]. Given the absence of a cell wall, the antibiotic arsenal available for the treatment of M. bovis infections is constrained [7]. The increasing resistance of M. bovis to multiple antibiotics is a growing concern, as it places a financial burden on farmers due to the elevated cost of treatments. Consequently, vaccination represents a valuable alternative for the prevention and control of M. bovis infection [8]. To achieve effective control of M. bovis infection, structurally conserved membrane proteins with multiple antigenic epitopes can be utilized for diagnostic characterization and vaccine development [6]. However, there is a lack of commercially available subunit vaccines that are effective against this disease currently. In mycoplasmas, the integral and membrane-associated proteins are exposed to the external environment and play an important role in the survival and pathogenesis of the agent. Mycoplasmas possess a number of several lipid-associated membrane proteins (LPPs) that are able to modulate immune responses [7]. In light of the research trend concerning membrane proteins of M. bovis and the previous research outcomes on M. bovis within our research group, this experiment was carried out with the four well-conserved M. bovis-associated membrane proteins (M27, M32, M498, and M663) that have numerous antigenic epitopes related to adhesion screened previously [8]. The objective of this study was to develop multi-protein subunit vaccine candidates using different combinations of four M. bovis membrane proteins (M27, M32, M498, and M663) with conserved and antigenic properties. The efficacy of the vaccine candidates was assessed through immunization and challenge tests in mice. These results will serve as references for further research into the development of novel M. bovis vaccines.

Materials and methods

Strains, cells, plasmid, and serum

The M. bovis Guizhou strain used in this study was isolated and preserved in our laboratory (Yuan et al. 2017). The prokaryotic expression vector pCold Ⅰ and recombinant expression vectors pCold-M27, pCold-M32, pCold-M498, and pCold-M663 were stocked in our laboratory. The Escherichia coli DH5α and BL21 (DE3) strains were purchased from Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, (Beijing, China). The premium horse serum (16,050,122) was purchased from Gibco (USA).

Expression, purification, and characterization of the recombinant fusion proteins

Specific primers (GenBank: NC_014760.1) were designed to amplify the M27, M32, M498, and M663 genes using the pCold-M27, pCold-M32, pCold-M498, and pCold-M663 plasmid as templates, respectively. Next, the fusion genes M27-32 (1 020 bp), M27-498 (1 167 bp), M27-663 (1 248 bp), M32-498 (870 bp), M32-663 (951 bp), M498-663 (1 101 bp), M27-32–498 (1 526 bp), M27-32–663 (1 620 bp), M27-498–663 (1 770 bp), M32-498–663 (1 473 bp), and M27-32–498-663 (2 160 bp) were amplified using splicing by overlap extension-polymerase chain reaction (SOE-PCR). Primer information is listed in Table 1. These genes were then subcloned into the pCold I vector using restriction enzymes Hind Ⅲ and Xba I (TaKaRa, Japan), respectively. Based on the nucleotide sequence of FAdV-4 ON1 strain (GenBank: GU188428). The obtained constructs (pCold-M27-32, pCold-M27-498, pCold-M27-663, pCold-M32-498, pCold-M32-663, pCold-M498-663, pCold-M27-32–498, pCold-M27-32–663, pCold-M27-498–663, pCold-M32-498–663, and pCold-M27-32–498-663) were identified and transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) and then cultured in a shaker at 170 r/min and 37 ℃. Once D600nm reached 0.6–0.8, the culture was induced with 1 mmol/L isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 3 h at 170 r/min and 16 ℃ for the expression of recombinant proteins.

Table 1.

Primers used for the PCR reactions

Primer name Primer sequence (5’−3’)
M27-F1 GG GGTACC ATGAAAGGTAAAAAGCCAGAAAGT
M27-R1 GCTTCCGCCACCGCCGCTTCCACCGCCACCATTTATTTTCTCATTATTAAT
M32-F1 GG GGTACC ATGATAAAAAAATCTAATAACAAT
M32-R1 GCTTCCGCCACCGCCGCTTCCACCGCCACCGTGAACAATTAACTTGGAAT
M32-R2 GGTGGCGGTGGAAGCGGCGGTGGCGGAAGCATGATAAAAAAATCTAATAACAAT
M32-R3 CG GGATCC TTAGTGAACAATTAACTTGGAAT
M498-F1 GG GGTACC ATGAAAAAGCATAAATTAGAAA
M498-R1 GGTGGCGGTGGAAGCGGCGGTGGCGGAAGCAAAAAGCATAAATTAGAAA
M498-R2 GGGGGGGGAGGTAGCGGAGGCGGAGGTAGCAAAAAGCATAAATTAGAAA
M498-R3 CG GGATCC TTATTCACCTCTGAATAATGCGCT
M663-F1 GG GGTACC ATGAAAGGTAAAAAGCCAGAAAGT
M663-R1 GGGGGGGGAGGTAGCGGAGGCGGAGGTAGCTTTCTTTTGCGTACTTTGA
M663-R2 GGTGGCGGTGGAAGCGGCGGTGGCGGAAGCAAAGGTAAAAAGCCAGAAAGT
M663-R3 CG GGATCC TTATTTCTTTTGCGTACTTTGA

Note: “___” indicates the linker; The Italic letter indicates restriction enzyme cleavage site

The samples were prepared and then analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). For the sake of convenience, the recombinant fusion membrane proteins were named as fusion proteins M27-32, M27-498, M27-663, M32-498, M32-663, M498-663, M27-32–498, M27-32–663, M27-498–663, M32-498–663, and M27-32–498-663, respectively. These proteins were purified using the His-Tag protein purification kit (OMEGA, USA), and the purified products were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis and Western blotting using a Rabbit-derived positive serum against M. bovis and a goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG)-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Biosynthesis Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China).

Immunization and challenge experiment

Protein concentration was determined using the BCA protein quantification kit. The subunit vaccine candidates were prepared by combining the expressed fusion proteins with Freund's adjuvant (1:1) for emulsification. To assess the immune effects of different M. bovis subunit vaccine candidates, experimental SPF female mice (n = 420) aged 4 weeks of age were randomly divided into 12 groups (n = 35). The vaccine candidates were administered via hypodermic injection (i.h.) into the neck and back. Likewise, subsequent booster immunizations were conducted at two-week intervals for a total of three injections. The detailed immunization procedures are listed in Table 2. The mice in each group were raised separately. Serum was collected separately from each group of mice (n = 3) per week. Serum was collected eight times from the pre-immunization period to the seventh week after immunization. One week after the final immunization, four mice were randomly selected from each group and then challenged via intramuscular injection in the leg with a minimum infectious dose (1 × 1010 CCU·mL−1) of M. bovis. The detailed immunization procedures in Table 2. The clinical symptoms of mice were recorded within 7 days. The presence of abnormal signs was judged to be morbid. The morbidity rate of mice in each experimental group was counted. The lungs were collected from mice euthanized two weeks after the challenge for histopathological analysis. Briefly, the lungs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde fixative and subsequently underwent a graded dehydration process with ethanol. The tissue block was made transparent using xylene and paraffin embedding, after which it was sliced, patched, and baked. The sections were dewaxed and stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE). Finally, the slices were sealed with neutral gum and then observed under the microscope to examine the pathological changes in the lung tissue. The experimental design is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 2.

The detailed immunization procedures in this study

Groups Dosage per mice Numbers of mice Immunization
Times Route
PBS 100 μL 35 3 i.h
M27-32 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M27-498 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M27-663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M32-498 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M32-663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M498-663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M27-32–498 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M27-32–663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M27-498–663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M32-498–663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h
M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine 100 μg 35 3 i.h

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the immunization and challenge experiment in mice. 420 mice were randomly divided into 12 groups (n = 35 per group) and immunized intramuscularly thrice with PBS or different subunit vaccine candidates. The immunizations were administered at two-week intervals. One week after the final immunization, mice (n = 4) were randomly selected from each group and then challenged by i.m. in the leg with a minimum infectious dose (1 × 1010 CCU·mL−1) of M. bovis. The lungs were collected from mice euthanized two weeks after the challenge for histopathological analysis

Detection of fusion protein-specific antibody and cytokine secretion by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

In this study, an indirect ELISA method was established for the detection of fusion protein specific antibody. Briefly, the purified fusion protein M27-32–498-663 was diluted as coated antigen and incubated in a 96-well plate overnight at 4 °C. After a one-hour blockage at 37 °C with 5% skim milk and three washes with Phosphate-Buffered Saline with Tween 20 (PBST), diluted serum samples were added to the coating plates and incubated for one hour at 37 °C. Blank control wells were set up. After three washes, the goat anti-mouse IgG HRP conjugate was added to each well, and incubation was performed for 1 h at 37 °C. After three washes, 50 μL of the chromogenic solution was added to each well and incubated in a light-protected environment at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 50 µL of terminator solution to each well, and the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm. Samples with an OD450 nm value less than 0.268 are considered negative, while those with an OD450 nm value greater than 0.268 are considered positive.

The secretion of Th1-type cytokines TNF-α (JYM0218Mo), IFN-γ (JYM0540Mo), and Th2-type cytokines IL-4 (JYM0011Mo), IL-5 (JYM0191Mo), and IL-6 (JYM0012Mo) (Wuhan Colorful-Gene biological technology Co., Ltd, China) in mouse serum was respectively measured according to the instructions for the mouse cytokine ELISA kits. Finally, the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm. A standard curve was plotted using the concentration of the standard sample on the abscissa and the OD450nm value on the ordinate. A regression equation for the standard curve was obtained. According to the OD450nm of the sample, the actual concentration of cytokines in each sample can be measured.

Statistical analysis

The results are shown as mean ± standard deviations (SD) of at least three independent experiments and were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA tests using the Prism 7.0 software. P-value < 0.05 denotes the statistical significance of the data.

Result

Expression and identification of the fusion proteins of M. bovis

Recombinant plasmids were transformed into E.coli BL21 (DE3), and the recombinant proteins were expressed through IPTG induction. Subsequently, the expression of each fusion protein was detected by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that a total of seven fusion proteins were obtained in this study. The purified fusion proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis, which exhibited specific bands of target proteins at the expected positions (Fig. 2A-G). These results suggest that the purified fusion proteins possess good reactogenicity, laying foundations for the development of the M. bovis fusion membrane protein subunit vaccine candidates.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion proteins. M: Protein marker. Lane 1: Unpurified fusion proteins. Lane 2: pColdⅠ empty plasmid bacterial culture. A SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-32 (43 kDa). B SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-498 (46 kDa). C SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-663 (53 kDa). D SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-32–498 (62 kDa). E SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-32–663 (69 kDa). F SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-498–663 (72 kDa). G SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the purified fusion protein M27-32–498-663 (88 kDa)

M. bovis membrane protein subunit vaccine candidates induce high-level specific antibodies in mice sera

To evaluate humoral immune response elicited by the different M. bovis subunit vaccines, the levels of specific antibodies in the sera of the immunized mice were determined by ELISA. Compared to the PBS group (control), all M. bovis subunit vaccine candidates induced a statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) in specific antibody levels, reaching a peak at 2 weeks post-immunization (wpi). These data indicate that all fusion protein subunit vaccines induced robust humoral immune responses (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Dynamics of fusion protein specific antibodies in the serum of immunized mice (n = 35). Mice were immunized three times at 2-week intervals with PBS or subunit vaccines (M27-32, M27-498, M27-663, M27-32–498, M27-32–663, M27-498–663, and M27-32–498-663). Serum samples were collected 7 days after each immunization, and antigen-specific antibodies were measured by indirect ELISA. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was denoted by different lowercase letters (P < 0.05), while Ns and same lowercase letters indicated no significant difference

M. bovis membrane protein subunit vaccine candidates induce robust Th1- and Th2-type responses in mice sera

To investigate the vaccine-induced cellular immune responses, secretion levels of Th1-type cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) in the sera of the immunized mice were determined by ELISA. Compared with the PBS group (control), all fusion protein subunit vaccine candidates stimulated robust expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α in mice. The highest levels of TNF-α secretion were observed in the immunized group at 5 wpi, while the peak levels of IFN-γ secretion were reached at 7 wpi in all experimental groups. These results indicate that the fusion protein vaccine candidates were all efficacious in stimulating Th1-type cellular immune responses in mice. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of the amount and trend of TNF-α and IFN-γ secretion throughout the trial period revealed that the vaccine candidates based on the M27-498–663, and M27-32–498-663 fusion proteins possess better immunization effects than other groups(P < 0.05) (Fig. 4 A and B).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Vaccination elevates the production of Th1-type cytokines in mice serum. A Vaccination induces the dynamic changes of TNF-α in mice serum. B Vaccination induces the dynamic changes of IFN-γ in mice serum. Mice were immunized three times at 2-week intervals with PBS or subunit vaccines (M27-32, M27-498, M27-663, M27-32–498, M27-32–663, M27-498–663, and M27-32–498-663). Serum samples were collected 7 days after each immunization, and Th1-type cytokines levels were measured by indirect ELISA. Comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was denoted by different lowercase letters (P < 0.05), while Ns and same lowercase letters indicated no significant difference

To further evaluate the humoral immune responses induced by the prepared vaccine candidates, the levels of Th2-type cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6) in the serum of immunized mice were measured by ELISA. Compared with the PBS group, all vaccine candidates enhanced ability to stimulate IL-4 secretion in mice, with the M27-498–663 subunit vaccine having the best effect on IL-4 secretion in mice (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, all vaccine immunization groups increased secretion IL-5 in comparison with the PBS group, among which the M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine group exhibited more effective stimulation of IL-5 secretion in mice (Fig. 5B). Additionally, all vaccine groups stimulated mice to produce high levels of IL-6, which remained high throughout the test period. Among them, the M27-498–663 and the M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccines were more effective in stimulating IL-6 secretion in mice (Fig. 5C). Collectively, the results displayed above indicate tests showed that all the prepared M. bovis subunit vaccines were able to stimulate Th1 and Th2-type cellular immune responses in mice.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Vaccination induces the production of Th2-type cytokines in mice serum. A Vaccination induces the levels of IL-4 in mice serum. B Vaccination induces the levels of IL-5 in mice serum. C Vaccination induces the levels of IL-6 in mice serum. Mice were immunized three times at 2-week intervals with PBS or subunit vaccines (M27-32, M27-498, M27-663, M27-32–498, M27-32–663, M27-498–663, and M27-32–498-663). Serum samples were collected 7 days after each immunization, and Th2-type cytokines levels were measured by indirect ELISA. Comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was denoted by different lowercase letters (P < 0.05), while Ns and same lowercase letters indicated no significant difference

M. bovis membrane protein subunit vaccine candidates attenuate the damage to the lungs induced by M. bovis challenge in mice

To assess the immunoprotective efficacy of the subunit vaccine candidates, four mice from each test group were infected with the minimum infectious dose (1 × 1010 CCU·mL−1) of M. bovis via intramuscular injection one week following the final immunization. The lung tissues of mice in each group were collected two weeks after the challenge, and tissue sections were prepared according to the conventional method. The pathological alterations in each group were then observed using a microscope after HE staining. The normal mouse alveoli are structurally intact, and no evidence of inflammation is present (Fig. 6A). In mice that had been immunized with PBS and subsequently infected with M. bovis, the alveoli formed fused foci of agglomerates, with degeneration or loss of alveolar structure, fracture of the alveolar wall, and infiltration of a large number of inflammatory cells (Fig. 6B). After M. bovis infection, M27-32–498 subunit vaccine immunized mice exhibited subtle alterations in alveolar structure, such as thickening of alveolar walls, and infiltration of inflammatory cells (Fig. 6C). Mice immunized with the M27-32 subunit vaccine infected with M. bovis showed slight alterations in alveolar structure, including thickening of the alveolar wall and partial infiltration of inflammatory cells (Fig. 6D). The subunit vaccine candidates M27-498, M27-663, and M27-32–663-immunized mice after M. bovis infection demonstrated subtle architectural changes of alveoli featuring focal alveolar wall thickening and minimal inflammatory cell infiltration in pulmonary tissue (Fig. 6E/F/G). M. bovis infection of mice immunized with the M27-498–663 subunit vaccine resulted in a more intact alveolar structure with a slight thickening of the alveolar wall and a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 6H). Of note, mice immunized with the M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine candidate followed by challenge with M. bovis showed a more intact alveolar structure, with no significant thickening of the alveolar wall and merely a minimal amount of inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 6I). Taken together, the subunit vaccine-immunized mice exhibited a relatively intact alveolar structure, a relatively lesser degree of alveolar wall thickening, a reduced number of inflammatory cells infiltrating the lungs, and a diminished extent of inflammatory manifestations in response to M. bovis infection, when compared to the control group. These results indicate that immunization with the vaccine candidates mitigates lung tissue damage caused by M. bovis infection in mice.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine effectively ameliorates M. bovis-induced lung injury in mice. A Lung sections of normal mice. B Lung sections of M. bovis infected mice immunized with PBS. C After M. bovis infection, M27-32–498 subunit vaccine immunized mice showed slight alterations in alveolar structure, thickening of alveolar walls, and inflammatory cell infiltration. D Mice immunized with the M27-32 subunit vaccine infected with M. bovis showed slight changes in alveolar structure, thickening of the alveolar wall, and partial infiltration of inflammatory cells. E/F/G The subunit vaccine candidates M27-498, M27-663, and M27-32–663-immunized mice after M. bovis infection demonstrated subtle architectural changes of alveoli featuring focal alveolar wall thickening and minimal inflammatory cell infiltration in pulmonary tissue. M. bovis infection of mice immunized with the M27-498–663 subunit vaccine resulted in a more intact alveolar structure with a slight thickening of the alveolar wall and a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration. I Mice immunized with the M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine followed by challenge with M. bovis showed a more intact alveolar structure, with no significant thickening of the alveolar wall and merely a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration. Bar: 100 μm

Discussion

M. bovis is highly contagious. And susceptibility of M. bovis to various antimicrobial classes targeting protein synthesis and DNA synthesis is decreased [9]. The main focus in the cattle industry is on the prevention of the disease, so the development of novel M. bovis vaccines is critical [10]. There are two commercially available M. bovis vaccines (Mycomune@R and Pulmo-GuardTMMpB), but they are not very effective [11]. Musa Mulongo et al. prepared two traditional subunit vaccines against M. bovis (M. bovis total extracts and membrane fractions). However, the experimental results show that the vaccines did not offer protection against challenge with an infective dose of M. bovis [12]. In the present study, we developed a series of genetically engineered subunit vaccine candidates using different combinations of four conserved membrane proteins of M. bovis that induced specific antibodies and Th1/Th2-type responses in mice sera, and ameliorated M. bovis-induced lung tissue damage in mice. While murine models provide proof-of-concept, protective efficacy in cattle may differ due to species-specific immune variations. These results support further evaluation of these antigens in bovine vaccine development.

To enhance the immune responses in subunit vaccines, we elected to augment the number of antigenic species. Four membrane protein genes were combined in varying quantities and expressed as fusion membrane proteins using genetic engineering techniques to obtain multiple fusion proteins. The results showed that we successfully expressed a series of fusion proteins, including M27-32, M27-498, M27-663, M27-32–498, M27-32–663, M27-498–663, and M27-32–498-663, respectively.

Mycoplasma can infect poultry, dogs, mice, cattle and other animals [13]. There are many reports of mycoplasmas in hosts that are not perceived as their normal habitat. Sometimes these “crossings” may have a pathological impact particularly where there may be predisposing conditions [14]. Anderson et al. also showed that Mycoplasma bovis exhibited pathogenicity in mice similar to that of cattle [15]. Therefore, BALB/c mice were chosen as test animals for this experiment. Immunization of mice with subunit vaccine prepared from fusion proteins to explore the immunoprotective effect of fusion proteins. Recognizing that immune responses may differ between murine and bovine systems.

Serum-specific antibody levels are a good indicator of humoral response Zhang Y et al. demonstrated that M. bovis can be killed directly by complement and that antibody-dependent complement-mediated killing is more effective than that by complement alone [16]. In this study, we found that all vaccine candidates elicited significantly higher specific antibodies compared to the PBS control group (P < 0.05). This suggested that the respective membrane proteins promoted the production of antigen-specific neutralizing antibodies and stimulated protective immunity. The overall secretion trend showed a peak 14 days after the first immunization, followed by a decline. There was a rebound 14 d after the second immunization, and no significant increase was seen after the third immunization, but it was relatively stable. The M27-498–663 subunit vaccine antibody was secreted at the highest level.

Cytokines, primarily produced by macrophages, antigen presenting cells and lymphocytes, activate the immune system in response to infection, particularly infection occurring at mucosal surfaces. TNF-α and IFN-γ expression it should be associated with increased clinical course and severity of lung lesions during M. Bovis pneumonia [16]. M. bovis induces mixed Th1-Th2 cytokine responses in M. Bovis-associated lung lesions. Rodríguez et al. demonstrated consistent upregulation of TNF-α, IL-4, and IFN-γ expression during M. bovis-associated pneumonic lesions. These cytokines can participate in the immune and inflammatory responses during the pulmonary defense mechanisms against M. bovis infection [17]. Vanden Bush TJ et al. suggest that experimental lung infection of cattle with M. bovis results in a Th2-skewed immune response [18]. In the present study, all the M. bovis subunit vaccines prepared stimulated the body to produce Th1 (TNF-α and IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6) type cellular immune responses. The inflammatory response in the lungs of mice in each vaccine-immunized attack group was attenuated compared with the control attack group. This suggests that each M. bovis membrane protein vaccine immunization group increased the resistance of mouse lungs to M. bovis infection. This may be related to an increase in antigens, or some combination of specific antigens. In addition, the pathological examination revealed that all vaccine groups exhibited less severe lung tissue damage compared to the control group, with the M27-32–498-663 subunit vaccine group showing the most preserved pulmonary architecture. These findings suggest that immunization with these membrane protein formulations was associated with attenuated inflammatory responses to M. bovis challenge in this murine model. While histological assessments were qualitative, future studies would benefit from quantitative metrics (e.g., alveolar wall thickness or standardized inflammatory scoring) to enhance objectivity, though sample constraints precluded this analysis herein.

While these results are promising, several considerations should be noted: (1) the protective efficacy was evaluated only in a murine model, (2) the immunological correlates of protection remain to be fully elucidated, and (3) the optimal adjuvant formulation requires further optimization. Subsequent studies will focus on refining the vaccine production process and investigating alternative adjuvant combinations in expanded mouse trials before progressing to bovine studies.

Conclusion

Results indicate that all M. bovis membrane protein subunit vaccine candidates constructed in this study induce significant specific antibodies and Th1 and Th2-type cytokine responses in mice. Of these, M27-498–663 and M27-32–498-66 subunit vaccine candidates demonstrate better potential as effective M. bovis subunit vaccine candidates in the future. While these murine data provide proof-of-concept, further studies are needed to: (1) optimize adjuvant formulations, (2) evaluate efficacy in the natural bovine host, and (3) assess long-term protection.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. (699.7KB, zip)
Supplementary Material 2. (27.7KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Guizhou University, the Key Laboratory of Animal Diseases and Veterinary Public Health of Guizhou Province, and the Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center of Guizhou Province.

Authors’ contributions

Yong Xuan Wang write up; Hong Song Cheng data collection and write up; Qian Hu, Shuai Bo Han, Ying Fen Li, Yu Jie Chen, data collection, analysis; Jun Yue, Er Peng Zhu and Zhentao Cheng supervision.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

We thank the following funds for the support in this work: The Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province (Nos. QKHZC[2021]1Y161); The Science and Technology Support Program of Guizhou Province (Nos. QKHPTRC[2021]5646).

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Specific pathogen-free(SPF) BALB/c female mice (n = 420, 4-week-old) were purchased from Topgene Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China). Animals were acclimatized for at least 5 days before initiation of the study. All animals were allowed free access to water and diet and provided with a 12 h light/dark cycle (temperature: 16–26 ℃, humidity: 40–70%). The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Guizhou University and the Committee for the Protection and Use of Experimental Animals EAE-GZU-2024-E039 (protocol number).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Er Peng Zhu, Email: zhu13782701756@126.com.

Zhen Tao Cheng, Email: ztcheng@gzu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Hale HH, Helmboldt CF, Plastridge WN, Stula EF. Bovine mastitis caused by a Mycoplasma species. Cornell Vet. 1962;52:582–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xin JQ, Li Y, Guo D, Song NH, Hu SP, Chen C, Pei J, Cao PL. First isolation and identification of mycoplasma bovis from dairy calves with pneumonia in China. Chin J of Prev Vet Med. 2008;(09):661–4.
  • 3.Calcutt MJ, Lysnyansky I, Sachse K, Fox LK, Nicholas RAJ, Ayling RD. Gap analysis of Mycoplasma bovis disease, diagnosis and control: an aid to identify future development requirements. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(Suppl 1):91–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu QY, Pan Q, Wu Q, Xin JQ. Mycoplasma Bovis adhesins and their target proteins. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1016641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fu P, Sun Z, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Zhang H, Su D, Jiang F, Wu W. Development of a direct competitive ELISA for the detection of Mycoplasma bovis infection based on a monoclonal antibody of P48 protein. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nussbaum S, Lysnyansky I, Sachse K, Levisohn S, Yogev D. Extended repertoire of genes encoding variable surface lipoproteins in Mycoplasma bovis strains. Infect Immun. 2002;70(4):2220–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Borchsenius SN, Daks A, Fedorova O, Chernova O, Barlev NA. Effects of mycoplasma infection on the host organism response via p53/NF-kappaB signaling. J Cell Physiol. 2018;234(1):171–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pitcher DG, Nicholas RAJ. Mycoplasma host specificity: fact or fiction? Vet J. 2005;170(3):300–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lysnyansky I, Ayling RD. Mycoplasma bovis: mechanisms of resistance and trends in antimicrobial susceptibility. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perez-Casal J, Prysliak T, Maina T, Suleman M, Jimbo S. Status of the development of a vaccine against Mycoplasma bovis. Vaccine. 2017;35(22):2902–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bokma J, Gille L, De Bleecker K, Callens J, Haesebrouck F, Pardon B, Boyen F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of mycoplasma bovis isolates from veal, dairy and beef herds. Antibiotics-Basel. 2020;9(12):882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maunsell FP, Woolums AR, Francoz D, Rosenbusch RF, Step DL, Wilson DJ, Janzen ED. Mycoplasma bovis infections in cattle. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25(4):772–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Soehnlen MK, Aydin A, Lengerich EJ, Houser BA, Fenton GD, Lysczek HR, Burns CM, Byler LI, Hattel AL, Wolfgang DR, et al. Blinded, controlled field trial of two commercially available Mycoplasma bovis bacterin vaccines in veal calves. Vaccine. 2011;29(33):5347–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mulongo M, Prysliak T, Perez-Casal J. Vaccination of feedlot cattle with extracts and membrane fractions from two Mycoplasma bovis isolates results in strong humoral immune responses but does not protect against an experimental challenge. Vaccine. 2013;31(10):1406–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anderson JC, Howard CJ, Gourlay RN. Experimental mycoplasma mastitis in mice. Infect Immun. 1976;13(4):1205–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Y, Li X. Antibodies specific to membrane proteins are effective in complement-mediated killing of mycoplasma bovis. Infect Immun. 2019;87(12):e00740–e819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rodriguez F, Castro P, Poveda JB, Afonso AM, Fernandez A. Immunohistochemical labelling of cytokines in calves infected experimentally with Mycoplasma bovis. J Comp Pathol. 2015;152(2–3):243–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vanden Bush TJ, Rosenbusch RF. Characterization of the immune response to Mycoplasma bovis lung infection. Vet Immunol Immunop. 2003;94(1–2):23–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1. (699.7KB, zip)
Supplementary Material 2. (27.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.


Articles from BMC Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES