Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1981 Jun;315:203–215. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013742

Effects of efferent stimulation on the saccule of goldfish.

T Furukawa
PMCID: PMC1249377  PMID: 7310707

Abstract

1. The effect of single or repetitive stimulation applied to efferent nerve fibres on afferent nerve activity and microphonic potentials was studied in the saccule of goldfish. 2. The sound-evoked excitatory post-synaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.s) recorded intracellularly from afferent eighth nerve fibres were reduced in size or completely abolished by efferent stimulation. The maximum inhibitory effect produced by repetitive efferent stimulation was equivalent to reducing the sound intensity by 10-25 db. Spontaneous miniature e.p.s.p.s were also suppressed by efferent stimulation. 3. The effect of single efferent stimulation appeared with a delay of 607 msec and lasted for about 40 msec, reaching its peak at about 12 msec. The slow and prolonged time course makes a sharp contrast with the very fast time course of afferent synaptic action. 4. The application of hyperpolarizing current through the recording micro-electrode revealed no sign of a post-synaptic increase in membrane conductance during inhibition. Hence, the inhibition was mostly attributable to a presynaptic action, i.e. to a suppression of transmitter release from hair cells. 5. Individual e.p.s.p.s were evoked in response to each wave of sound without any change in latency, but reached their peak much earlier during inhibition than in the control period. A likely explanation for this finding is that transmitter is released from hair cells during inhibition only in the early part of the stimulatory phase of the sound wave. 6. The extracellularly recorded microphonic potentials showed a slight increase in amplitude during efferent stimulation. 7. The nature and site of action of efferent nerve action are discussed along with some drug effects.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bobbin R. P., Konishi T. Action of cholinergic and anticholinergic drugs at the crossed olivocochlear bundle-hair cell junction. Acta Otolaryngol. 1974 Jan-Feb;77(1):56–65. doi: 10.3109/00016487409124598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corey D. P., Hudspeth A. J. Ionic basis of the receptor potential in a vertebrate hair cell. Nature. 1979 Oct 25;281(5733):675–677. doi: 10.1038/281675a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DESMEDT J. E., DELWAIDE P. J. FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF THE EFFERENT COCHLEAR BUNDLE OF THE PIGEON REVEALED BY STEREOTAXIC STIMULATION. Exp Neurol. 1965 Jan;11:1–26. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(65)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Desmedt J. E., Robertson D. Ionic mechanism of the efferent olivo-cochlear inhibition studied by cochlear perfusion in the cat. J Physiol. 1975 May;247(2):407–428. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FEX J. Augmentation of cochlear microphonic by stimulation of efferent fibres to the cochlea; preliminary report. Acta Otolaryngol. 1959 Nov-Dec;50:540–541. doi: 10.3109/00016485909129230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fay R. R. Coding of information in single auditory-nerve fibers of the goldfish. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Jan;63(1):136–146. doi: 10.1121/1.381705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fex J. Efferent inhibition in the cochlea related to hair-cell dc activity: study of postsynaptic activity of the crossed olivocochlear fibres in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am. 1967 Mar;41(3):666–675. doi: 10.1121/1.1910395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flock A., Russell I. J. The post-synaptic action of efferent fibres in the lateral line organ of the burbot Lota lota. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):591–605. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Flock A., Russell I. Inhibition by efferent nerve fibres: action on hair cells and afferent synaptic transmission in the lateral line canal organ of the burbot Lota lota. J Physiol. 1976 May;257(1):45–62. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Furukawa T., Ishii Y., Matsuura S. An analysis of microphonic potentials of the sacculus of goldfish. Jpn J Physiol. 1972 Dec;22(6):603–616. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.22.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furukawa T., Ishii Y., Matsuura S. Synaptic delay and time course of postsynaptic potentials at the junction between hair cells and eighth nerve fibers in the goldfish. Jpn J Physiol. 1972 Dec;22(6):617–635. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.22.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Furukawa T., Ishii Y. Neurophysiological studies on hearing in goldfish. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Nov;30(6):1377–1403. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.6.1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Furukawa T., Matsuura S. Adaptive rundown of excitatory post-synaptic potentials at synapses between hair cells and eight nerve fibres in the goldfish. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:193–209. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Furukawa T. Sites on termination on the saccular macula of auditory nerve fibers in the goldfish as determined by intracellular injection of procion yellow. J Comp Neurol. 1978 Aug 15;180(4):807–814. doi: 10.1002/cne.901800411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GALAMBOS R. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol. 1956 Sep;19(5):424–437. doi: 10.1152/jn.1956.19.5.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hama K. A study on the fine structure of the saccular macula of the gold fish. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;94(2):155–171. doi: 10.1007/BF00339353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ishii Y., Matsuura S., Furukawa T. An input-output relation at the synapse between hair cells and eighth nerve fibers in goldfish. Jpn J Physiol. 1971 Feb;21(1):91–98. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.21.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Llinás R., Precht W. The inhibitory vestibular efferent system and its relation to the cerebellum in the frog. Exp Brain Res. 1969 Aug 19;9(1):16–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00235449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nakajima Y., Wang D. W. Morphology of afferent and efferent synapses in hearing organ of the goldfish. J Comp Neurol. 1974 Aug 15;156(4):403–416. doi: 10.1002/cne.901560403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rossi M. L., Prigioni I., Valli P., Casella C. Activation of the efferent system in the isolated frog labyrinth: effects on the afferent EPSPs and spike discharge recorded from single fibres of the posterior nerve. Brain Res. 1980 Mar 3;185(1):125–137. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90677-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Russell I. J. Influence of efferent fibres on a receptor. Nature. 1968 Jul 13;219(5150):177–178. doi: 10.1038/219177a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Russell I. J., Sellick P. M. Intracellular studies of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. J Physiol. 1978 Nov;284:261–290. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Russell I. J. The pharmacology of efferent synapses in the lateral-line system of Xenopus laevis. J Exp Biol. 1971 Jun;54(3):643–658. doi: 10.1242/jeb.54.3.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. SMITH C. A., RASMUSSEN G. L. Recent observations on the olivo-cochlear bundle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1963 Jun;72:489–506. doi: 10.1177/000348946307200218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmidt T., Wellhöner H. H. The reflex influence of a group of slowly conducting vagal afferents on alpha and gamma discharges in cat intercostal nerves. Pflugers Arch. 1970;318(4):333–345. doi: 10.1007/BF00586973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Teas D. C., Konishi T., Nielsen D. W. Electrophysiological studies on the spatial distribution of the crossed olivocochlear bundle along the guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972 Apr;51(4):1256–1264. doi: 10.1121/1.1912969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wiederhold M. L., Kiang N. Y. Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970 Oct;48(4):950–965. doi: 10.1121/1.1912234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wiederhold M. L., Peake W. T. Efferent inhibition of auditory-nerve responses: dependence on acoustic-stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am. 1966 Dec;40(6):1427–1430. doi: 10.1121/1.1910243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wiederhold M. L. Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970 Oct;48(4):966–977. doi: 10.1121/1.1912235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES