Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Oct 3;20(10):e0328443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328443

Clinical & laboratory profiles and treatment outcome of Kawasaki disease in children: Experience from a tertiary care hospital

Shareen Khan 1,*, Md Abid Hossain Mollah 1, Abdul Baki 1, Nabila Tabassum 2, Nasreen Islam 1, Amrita Lal Halder 1, Tasnima Ahmed 1, Nurun Nahar Fatema 3, Jebun Nahar 1, Fauzia Mohsin 1, Mohammod Jobayer Chisti 4
Editor: Jyoti Sharma5
PMCID: PMC12494243  PMID: 41042754

Abstract

Background

A total of 40 cases of Kawasaki Disease (KD), diagnosed & categorized on the basis of criteria set by the American Heart Association were studied. We sought to evaluate their clinical and laboratory analysis along with their treatment.

Methods

After inclusion, they underwent thorough clinical and laboratory analysis and were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and aspirin. Their clinical & laboratory findings and treatment outcome were analyzed further using Epi info and at a probability of (p value) < 0.05, was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of the cases was 4.1 ± 2.9 years and boys outnumber the girls (57% vs. 43%). Most (65%) of the cases were incomplete KD compared to 35% as complete KD. The mean duration of fever was 11.7 ± 5.53 days. The frequency of the different classic clinical findings of KD were- cracking of lips & redness of oral cavity (72%), polymorphous skin rash (50%), conjunctival injection (45%), changes in the distal extremities (38%), cervical lymphadenitis (30%) and erythema on BCG scar (7.5%). High C-Reactive protein (CRP > 10 mg/dl), thrombocytosis, anaemia and leukocytosis were 85%, 45%, 43%, 38% respectively. Echocardiography showed coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) dilatation and aneurysm in 82.5% and 12.5% cases respectively which came down to 68% and 10% after receiving treatment with IVIg and Aspirin.

Conclusion & Recommendation

Diagnosis of KD is essentially clinical and criteria-based and 95% were complicated with CAA. Timely intervention with IVIG was mostly effective. Therefore, high index of suspicion of a long-continued febrile child is recommended to reach the diagnosis and to initiate timely intervention so as to potentially prevent CAA.

Introduction

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute febrile illness of childhood seen worldwide and highest among the Asians [1]. The aetiology of KD is unknown but certain genetic markers (such as HLA-B51 and HLA-Bw22j2 serotypes, chemokine receptor gene-cluster CCR2-CCR5 haplotypes and FCGR3A polymorphism of the IgG receptor IIIa) show a predisposition to the disease. Clinical and epidemiological patterns suggest that it follows exposure to infectious agents like human coronaviruses, bacteria, fungi, house mites but to date, no single agent has been identified as the leading cause [2,3]. Clinical features are characterized by fever lasting for at least five days along with changes in the oral cavity, erythema of hands and feet, bilateral non-purulent conjunctivitis, polymorphous skin rash and cervical lymphadenopathy [1]. Additional symptoms include gastrointestinal symptoms, aseptic meningitis, mild hepatitis, urethritis, uveitis, sterile pyuria and arthritis. Patients vaccinated with BCG vaccine may show reactivation of the inoculation site. KD shock syndrome is a rare but severe form of the illness in which patients present with vasodilatory shock, hypotension, and poor perfusion, with or without myocardial dysfunction [4]. Kawasaki disease is an acute inflammatory vasculitis of medium sized elastic arteries that has a high predilection for the coronary arteries [5]. It is the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children and approximately 20−25% of untreated and less than 5% of the treated KD patients develop coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) [1]. The initial treatment of KD includes single dose of IVIg and first at a moderate anti thrombotic dose till the patient is afebrile followed by a low antiplatelet dose [1].However, children with high risk (Z score ≥ 2.5 on initial echocardiogram and age < 6 months) may benefit from intensification of therapy with IVIg plus adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapy (corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (e.g., infliximab and etanercept,interleukin-1 inhibitor, e.g., anakinra, cyclosporine) to reduce the risk of coronary artery aneurysm. IVIg resistance KD (persistent or recrudescent of fever at least 36 hours and < 7 days after completion of 1st IVIg infusion) are treated with 2nd dose of IVIg or IVIg plus methylprednisolone, infliximab, Anakinra, Cyclosporine, Cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange [4].

The incidence of KD has been increasing rapidly globally. In North America, Europe and Australia, the incidence is 5–22 per 100,000 children <5 years old [6]. Countries like Japan, Korea and Taiwan report an incidence of more than 10 times greater than North America, Australia and Europe [7]. In countries like India, China, Srilanka, the incidence of KD has been gradually increasing. Before 1990, there were only three reported cases in almost all regions of India but after that it has been reported in almost all cities of India with 4.5 cases per 100,000 children less than 15 years. In China, the reported incidence varies between 7.06 & 55.1 per 100,000 children < 5 years [8]. Although, a study from the Department of Paediatrics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) in Bangladesh showed that there was an increase in the number of KD cases over the last 5 years, the exact evidential incidence of KD in this country is still unknown [9]. Therefore, the objective of the study was to see the clinical & laboratory profile of KD patients and their response to treatment.

Rationale of the study

Considering the high incidence of acquired heart disease (coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) among untreated children with KD, awareness of the physicians/ pediatricians on case detection of this growing problem will help non-missing of the cases and thereby prevention of CAA through appropriate management

Knowledge gap

Lack of awareness of the physicians on the case definition of KD.

Objectives of the study

  • To study the clinical profile of children diagnosed as KD

  • To study the patterns of coronary artery abnormalities

  • To study other laboratory findings

  • To study the treatment outcome

Materials & methods

This cross-sectional (retrospective) study was done in the Department of Paediatrics in BIRDEM General Hospital from June 2019 to April 2023. A total of forty diagnosed KD patients according to the criteria of American Heart Association were included in this study [5]. After inclusion a thorough clinical evaluation were done to exclude any other problems. Patients were categorized as complete or typical KD if they had fever >5 days and ≥ 4 of the 5 of the following classic criteria of KD.

  • i

    Erythema and cracking of lips, strawberry tongue, and/or erythema of oral and pharyngeal mucosa

  • ii

    Bilateral bulbar conjunctival injection without exudates.

  • iii

    Rash: maculopapular, diffuse erythema, or erythema multiforme- like.

  • iv

    Erythema and edema of the hands and feet in acute phase and/or periungual desquamation in subacute phase

  • v

    Cervical lymphadenopathy (≥1.5 cm diameter), usually unilateral

Incomplete or atypical KD diagnostic criteria.

  • i. Prolonged unexplained fever and 2-3/5 clinical criteria

OR.

  • ii. infants with unexplained fever 7 days AND compatible laboratory or echocardiographic findings:

    • ◦ CRP ≥ 3 mg/dl or ESR ≥ 40 mm/hr, or both; + 3 or more of the following:

      • Anaemia for age

      • Platelet ≥ 4,50000

      • Albumin ≤ 3 g/dl

      • Elevated ALT

      • Elevated WBCs ≥ 15,000/cmm

      • Urine WBCs ≥ 10/hpf

    • Z score of LAD (Left anterior descending) Coronary artery or RCA (Right Coronary artery) ≥ 2.5

    • ◦ Or ≥ 3 other suggestive features exist, including decreased left ventricular function, mitral regurgitation, pericardial effusion or Z scores in LAD or RCA 2-2.5

Age, sex and clinical features of the children were recorded for each patient. Complete blood count (CBC), ESR, C-Reactive protein (CRP), SGPT, S. creatinine, blood C/S, Urine R/ME, C/S, echocardiography and chest X- Ray c were performed for each child and reports were recorded. All patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and aspirin. Other thrombolytic agents and disease modifying drugs were used in a few cases where indicated. After improvement, patents were discharged and followed up in the Paediatric Rheumatology outdoor in BIRDEM. Follow up echocardiography was performed in all patients 6 weeks after treatment.

Ethical statement

Approval of the waiving Ethical Review was taken from the BIRDEM Institutional Review Board. The data were accessed on November 7, 2024 and the authors had access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection. However, the data were deidentified before analysis of data for manuscript writing, and thus, consent from the parents was not taken.

Sample size

Kawasaki disease (KD) exhibits significant geographic variability in incidence, ranging from 5–22 per 100,000 children <5 years in North America and Europe [6]. 4.5 per 100,000 children <15 years in India and 7–55 per 100,000 in China [8]. These findings suggest that a sample size of 33 or fewer patients is sufficient to detect meaningful differences. Since our study included 40 patients, the sample size is more than adequate.

Statistical analysis plan

Statistical analysis of the data was done using Epi info (3.4.1). Both bi-variate and multiple logistic regression analysis were done to disclose the unadjusted and adjusted association between the clinical and laboratory parameters of complete and incomplete KD. A probability (p value) < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and the strength of association was evaluated by calculation odds ratio and their 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Among the 40 confirmed cases of KD, 26 (65%) were diagnosed as incomplete KD and 14 (35%) as complete KD.

There were 23 (57%) males and 17 (43%) females with male to female ratio of 1.3:1. The mean age of the patients was 4.1 ± 2.9 years.

  • S.ALT, S creatinine, S albumin, urine r/m/e & c/s, blood c/s and chest X-ray were within normal limits in all the patients Leukocytosis: White blood cell count more than 11000/mm [10]

  • Thrombocytosis: Platelet count more than 450,000/uL [11]

  • Anaemia: Anemia is defined as a hemoglobin level that is two standard deviations below the mean for age [11]

  • Elevated CRP > 10 mg/dL [12]

  • Raised ESR: > 20 mm in 1st hr [13]

Table 1 shows that all the patients had fever and the mean duration of fever was 11.7 days. Changes in lips and oral cavity, e.g., erythema and cracking of lips, redness of tongue, and/or erythema of oral mucosa was present in 29 (72%) patients, half of the patients (50%) had polymorphous skin rash. Bilateral non-purulent conjunctival injections were noted in 18 (45%) patients, 15 (38%) had changes in distal extremities, e.g., erythema and edema of the hands and feet and periungual desquamation, 12 (30%) had unilateral cervical lymphadenopathy and erythema at BCG scars were noted in 3 (7.5%) cases. Elevated CRP in 34 (85%) patients, raised ESR in 31(78%) patients, thrombocytosis in 18(45%), anaemia in 17 (43%) and leukocytosis in 15(38%) patients.

Table 1. Distribution of patients according to clinical features and laboratory findings (n = 40).

Clinical features Frequency
(number)
Percentage (%)
Fever
*Mean duration 11.7 days ±5.53
40 100
Changes in lips and oral cavity 29 72
Polymorphous skin rash 20 50
Bilateral non-purulent conjunctival injection 18 45
Changes in distal extremities 15 38
Cervical lymphadenopathy 12 30
Erythema on BCG scar 03 7.5
Leukocytosis 15 38
Thrombocytosis 18 45
Anaemia 17 43
Elevated CRP 34 85
Raised ESR 31 78

Table 2 shows, among the forty patients initial echocardiography showed coronary artery dilatation in 33 (82.5%) patients, aneurysm in 5 (12.5%) patients and normal coronary artery in 2(5%) patients. Follow up echocardiography after 6weeks shows 27 (68%) patients had normal echocardiogram after receiving treatment, dilatation still persisted in 9(22%) cases and 4 (10%) still had aneurysm.

Table 2. Distribution of patients according to initial echocardiography findings and after receiving treatment (n = 40).

Initial Echocardiography (before treatment)
Echocardiography findings Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Normal 2 5
Dilatation 33 82.5
Aneurysm 5 12.5
Echocardiography findings (6 weeks after treatment)
Normal 27 68
Dilatation 9 22
Aneurysm 4 10

Table 3 shows, all the patients received IVIg and Aspirin. Four patients received warfarin along with aspirin due to persistence of coronary artery aneurysm. In one of these patients, oral steroid was also given. Two IVIg resistant cases received methyl prednisolone and one also received Infliximab. One of the patients received Tocilizumab due to concurrent KD and COVID-19 in the patient.

Table 3. Distribution of patients according to treatment (n = 40).

Name of the drugs Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
IVIg 40 100
Aspirin in adequate dose 40 100
Warfarin 4 13
Steroid 3 8
Infliximab 1 3
Tocilizumab 1 3

Table 3 shows, all the patients received IVIg and Aspirin. Four patients received warfarin along with aspirin due to persistence of coronary artery aneurysm. In one of these patients, oral steroid was also given. Two IVIg resistant cases received methyl prednisolone and one also received Infliximab. One of the patients received Tocilizumab due to concurrent KD and COVID-19 in the patient.

Number and percentages of the clinical and laboratory parameters are shown in Table 4 between complete and incomplete KD.

Table 4. Clinical and laboratory findings between complete and incomplete KD.

Complete KD (n = 14)
Number (percentage)
Incomplete KD (n = 26)
Number (percentage)
Changes in lips and oral cavity 14 (100) 15(58)
Polymorphous skin rash 14 (100) 6(23)
Changes in distal extremities 13 (92) 2(8)
Bilateral non-purulent conjunctival injection 13 (92) 5(19)
Cervical lymphadenopathy 9(64) 3(12)
Elevated CRP 14(100) 20(77)
Raised ESR 12(86) 19(73)
Thrombocytosis 9(64) 9(35)
Anaemia 8(57) 9(355
Leukocytosis 6(43) 9(35)

After adjustment of confounders in Table 5, children with complete KD more often were associated with polymorphous skin reaction and higher CRP.

Table 5. Bi-variate (unadjusted) and multiple logistic regression (adjusted) analysis to explore the association between complete and incomplete KD.

Unadjusted Adjusted
Characteristic OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Duration of fever 1.00 (0.89, 1.13) 0.993
Leukocytosis
No —
Yes 0.71 (0.18, 2.73) 0.608
Thrombocytosis
No —
Yes 0.29 (0.07, 1.11) 0.078
Lips & redness of oral cavity
No —
Yes 0.12 (0.01, 0.77) 0.060 0.20 (0.00, 33.8) 0.557
Anaemia
No —
Yes 0.40 (0.10, 1.48) 0.174
Conjunctiva
No —
Yes 0.05 (0.01, 0.24) 0.001 0.02 (0.001, 0.21) 0.009
High C-Reactive protein (CRP > 10 mg/dl)
No —
Yes 0.32 (0.02, 2.31) 0.326
Polymorphous skin rash
No —
Yes 0.03 (0.00, 0.18) 0.002 0.02 (0.001, 0.44) 0.027
Raised ESR
No —
Yes 0.91 (0.17, 4.20) 0.905
Extremities
No —
Yes 0.12 (0.02, 0.51) 0.007 0.23 (0.01, 3.64) 0.309
Lymphadenopathy
No — —
Yes 0.14 (0.03, 0.58) 0.009 0.19 (0.01, 2.23) 0.226
Aneurysm
No — —
Yes 0.10 (0.00, 0.78) 0.051
Dilatation
No — —
Yes 3.07 (0.58, 18.1) 0.189

Table 6 shows that Coronary artery aneurysm was significantly higher in Complete KD but there were no significant differences between Coronary artery dilatation and types of KD.

Table 6. Comparison between types of KD and coronary artery abnormalities.

Aneurysm
Types of KD Yes No P value
Complete 4(28.6%) 1(71.4%) 0.04
Incomplete 1(3.8%) 25(96.2%)

Dilatation
Types of KD Yes No P value
Complete 10 (71.4%) 4(28.6%) 0.17
Incomplete 23(88.5%) 3(11%)

Discussion

Kawasaki Disease is an acute systemic vasculitis that occurs predominantly in infants and young children [2]. It occurs mainly in children aged < 5years and predominantly in male [14]. It is a self-limiting childhood illness, but it may cause coronary artery lesion and long-term morbidity [15]. Most studies have shown that percentage of typical KD is more than atypical KD [16]. However, in our study the percentage of atypical KD was more (65%). One of the hands, several studies done in Asian countries have shown that in countries particularly Japan, China, South Korea have reported higher incidence of atypical KD, partly due to genetic predisposition. Variation in environmental factors and infectious agents across the Asian countries might also influence the incidence of atypical KD in this region [17–19]. In our study, all the children with KD presented with fever with average duration of around two weeks. Out of the five cardinal features, the most frequent symptom was changes in lips and oral cavity, followed by skin rash, bilateral conjunctival injection, changes in distal extremities and cervical lymphadenopathy. A study by Hua Zhu, Shao Fei Yu in Mongolia found that among the five cardinal features changes in lips (65.9%) and cervical lymphadenopathy were most common [19]. Another study done in Iran by Yazdan et al. also found that changes in lips and oral cavity were present in 70% of KD patients [17].

Polymorphous skin rash and high CRP were found to be independently associated with complete KD. This result is consistent with several other studies of case series by Guida F et al. [20], Shuai S et al. [21] and Yang X et al. [15].

Cardiac lesion is the single most important complication of Kawasaki disease. In this study, 95% of the children had coronary artery abnormalities with 82.5% patients having dilatation and 12.5% patients having aneurysm. Behmadi M et al. found that 59% of their KD patients had coronary artery lesions [22]. In our study, all the patients except two had coronary artery abnormalities. This high percentage of cardiac involvement was most probably because by the time the patients presented to us were already in an advanced stage of the disease.

Studies have also shown that the percentage of coronary artery involvement is higher among Asian population rather than the western countries. A number of factors play an important part regarding this. The incidence of KD is significantly higher in eastern Asian countries than that of the west, therefore increasing the overall chance of CAA among the Asian population [23]. Genetic predisposition plays an important role in the development of CAA. Studies have shown several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with KD in Asian populations, including genes involved in immune regulation such as ITPKC, CASP3, and FCGR2A, thus contributing to an increased inflammatory response, elevating the risk of coronary complications [24].

All the forty patients with KD were treated with IVIG, Aspirin and other thrombolytics and biological agents according to the guidelines of American Heart Association [5]. Follow up echocardiography done after 6 weeks of treatment showed that 32.5% had cardiac involvement which was previously 95% with dilatation still persisting in 9 patients and aneurysm in four patients.

In two of our IVIG resistant patients, methylprednisolone was given with one of them also received Infliximub due to persistence of fever. Infliximub, a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor is also given for the treatment of IVIG resistant cases, usually if second dose of IVIG or corticosteroid are not effective. A metanalysis study by Yan Pan, Qihong Fan and Luoyi Hu found that Infliximab exhibited remarkable antipyretic effect and they concluded that it was the best option against IVIg resistant KD [23]. One of our patients had COVID-19 and KD concurrently and was afterwards treated with Tocilizumab for COVID-19 infection. Recently published cases have shown association between Kawasaki disease and SARS COVID-2 virus which highlights the value of testing pediatric patients for COVID-19 initially diagnosed with KD [25,26].

Comparison between the clinical features and types of KD showed that all the five cardinal features were significantly more common in complete KD. Gorcyza et al. [27] and Manlhiot C et al. [28] also found similar results in their studies. We found no significant differences between most of the laboratory findings and types of KD which was also similar to the study by Manlhiot C et al. [28]. Several studies regarding coronary artery involvement between typical and atypical KD showed no significant differences between aneurysm and types of KD [28]. However, in this study it was found that coronary artery aneurysm was significantly more in typical KD.

The limitation of the study is the single centered study and provided the limited laboratory information. However, the strength of the study is the adequate sample and power of the study. We had over 90% power to detect the observed difference between groups. This enhances the accuracy and reliability of our results (e.g., narrower confidence intervals) and provides strong statistical power.

Conclusion

This study concluded that-

  • Atypical/incomplete KD were found more than the complete KD

  • Boys affected more than the girls

  • Ninety-five percent of KD children had coronary artery abnormalities, e.g., coronary artery dilatation and aneurysm

  • Coronary artery aneurysm was detected significantly more in typical KD while Coronary artery dilatation was significantly higher in atypical KD

  • Majority (95%) of the patients improved after giving IVIg

  • All the 5 cardinal features were significantly higher in typical KD but no differences were noted on the haematological parameters between the types of KD.

Recommendations

High index of suspicion is required for diagnosis of Kawasaki disease when a child presents with pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO). Echocardiography should be done in cases of suspected KD as timely intervention can prevent long term morbidity.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Brigadier General Dr NNF Begum, Professor of Pediatric Cardiologist of Dhaka CMH, Bangladesh for kindly helping by performing the echocardiography of the patients.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of the fact that the data can only be shared publicly with the permission of Ethics Committee of BIRDEM. Data are available from the BIRDEM Institutional Ethics Committee (contact via professorahm@yahoo.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Son MB, Newburger JW. Kawasaki disease. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, Schor NF, Geme JW, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21 ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2025. p. 1540–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Owens AM, Plewa MC. Kawasaki Disease. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vervoort D, Donné M, Van Gysel D. Pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of Kawasaki disease: An update for the pediatric dermatologist. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(6):743–7. doi: 10.1111/pde.13620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jone P-N, Tremoulet A, Choueiter N, Dominguez SR, Harahsheh AS, Mitani Y, et al. Update on Diagnosis and Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;150(23):e481–500. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long-Term Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(17):e927–99. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elakabawi K, Lin J, Jiao F, Guo N, Yuan Z. Kawasaki Disease: Global Burden and Genetic Background. Cardiol Res. 2020;11(1):9–14. doi: 10.14740/cr993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Makino N, Nakamura Y, Yashiro M, Ae R, Tsuboi S, Aoyama Y, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of Kawasaki disease in Japan, 2011-2012: from the results of the 22nd nationwide survey. J Epidemiol. 2015;25(3):239–45. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiao F, Jindal AK, Pandiarajan V, Khubchandani R, Kamath N, Sabui T, et al. The emergence of Kawasaki disease in India and China. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2017;2017(3):e201721. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2017.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rahman SA, Laila K. Kawasaki disease in children: a brief update. J Bangladesh Coll Phys. 2024;42(1):68–77. doi: 10.3329/jbcps.v42i1.70643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saxena R, Pati HP, Mahapatra M. Haemorrhagic disorders: Capillary and Platelet defects. de Gruchy’s Clinical Haematology in Medical Practice. 6th ed. New Delhi: Wiley. 2013. p. 372. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Baker RD, Greer FR, Committee on Nutrition American Academy of Pediatrics. Diagnosis and prevention of iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia in infants and young children (0-3 years of age). Pediatrics. 2010;126(5):1040–50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mack DR, Langton C, Markowitz J, LeLeiko N, Griffiths A, Bousvaros A, et al. Laboratory values for children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1113–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yim D, Curtis N, Cheung M, Burgner D. Update on Kawasaki disease: epidemiology, aetiology and pathogenesis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49(9):704–8. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bhardwaj P, Yadav V, Sharma M. Clinical profile and outcome of kawasaki disease in children in himalayan region of North India. Indian J Rheumatol. 2016;11(3):149. doi: 10.4103/0973-3698.187418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang X, Zou J, Nie H, Zhang G, Liao Y, Deng J, et al. Identification of clinical risk factors for coronary artery lesions in children with Kawasaki disease: a retrospective cohort study. Cardiol Young. 2024;:1–9. doi: 10.1017/S1047951124000829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Burns JC, Hoshino S, Kobayashi T. Kawasaki disease: an essential comparison of coronary artery aneurysm criteria. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(12):840–1. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30334-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim JS, Kwon SH. Atypical Kawasaki disease presenting as a retropharyngeal abscess. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(4):484–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.04.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu H, Yu S-F, Bai Y-X, Liang Y-Y, Su X-W, Pan J-Y. Kawasaki disease in children: Epidemiology, clinical symptoms and diagnostics of 231 cases in 10 years. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10(1):357–61. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yu X, Yang M-C, Jindal AK, Alias A, Hung L-C, Lin M-T, et al. A collaborative study for incomplete Kawasaki disease in Asia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2023;26(12):2589–91. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guida F, Morana E, Tarì EM, Frazzoni L, Andreozzi L, Baselli LA, et al. Risk factors associated with persistent coronary artery lesions in children with Kawasaki disease in an Italian cohort. Eur J Pediatr. 2025;184(6):377. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06162-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shuai S, Zhang H, Zhang R, Tang M, Luo E, Yang Y, et al. Prediction of coronary artery lesions based on C-reactive protein levels in children with Kawasaki Disease: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023;99(4):406–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Behmadi M, Alizadeh B, Malek A. Comparison of Clinical Symptoms and Cardiac Lesions in Children with Typical and Atypical Kawasaki Disease. Med Sci (Basel). 2019;7(4):63. doi: 10.3390/medsci7040063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pan Y, Fan Q, Hu L. Treatment of immunoglobulin-resistant kawasaki disease: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of different regimens. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1149519. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1149519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xie X, Shi X, Liu M. The Roles of Genetic Factors in Kawasaki Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Genetic Association Studies. Pediatr Cardiol. 2018;39(2):207–25. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1760-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peterson N, Sagdeo K, Tyungu D, Harper C, Mihaylo K, Pollak-Christian E. Discovering Associations: Kawasaki Disease and COVID-19. Case Rep Pediatr. 2020;2020:8880242. doi: 10.1155/2020/8880242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tabakotani H, Ishii M, Ogawa M, Mizuki K, Hoshina T. Characteristics of Kawasaki disease in children with a history of COVID-19. J Infect Chemother. 2025;31(9):102755. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2025.102755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gorczyca D, Postępski J, Olesińska E, Lubieniecka M, Lachór-Motyka I, Opoka-Winiarska V, et al. The clinical profile of Kawasaki disease of children from three Polish centers: a retrospective study. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(6):875–80. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2836-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Manlhiot C, Christie E, McCrindle BW, Rosenberg H, Chahal N, Yeung RSM. Complete and incomplete Kawasaki disease: two sides of the same coin. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(4):657–62. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1631-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jyoti Sharma

12 May 2025

-->PONE-D-24-55276-->-->Clinical & laboratory profiles and treatment outcome of Kawasaki Disease in children: Experience from a tertiary care hospital-->-->PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chisti,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 26 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:-->

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jyoti Sharma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.  Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf   and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the online submission form you indicate that your data is not available for proprietary reasons and have provided a contact point for accessing this data. Please note that your current contact point is a co-author on this manuscript. According to our Data Policy, the contact point must not be an author on the manuscript and must be an institutional contact, ideally not an individual. Please revise your data statement to a non-author institutional point of contact, such as a data access or ethics committee, and send this to us via return email. Please also include contact information for the third party organization, and please include the full citation of where the data can be found.

3. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

-->Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. -->

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)-->

Reviewer #1: This manuscript examines Kawasaki Disease in children at a Bangladeshi tertiary care hospital, providing valuable data through detailed clinical and laboratory profiles of 40 cases. While the study's strengths include clear documentation of treatment outcomes, several concerns need addressing - notably the unusually high rates of incomplete KD and coronary abnormalities, statistical rigor, methodology clarity, and limited discussion of findings in context of current literature. With appropriate revisions, this work could meaningfully contribute to understanding KD in Bangladesh.

Major Comments:

1. While several laboratory tests were performed (CBC, ESR, CRP, SGPT, S. creatinine, blood C/S, Urine R/ME, C/S), the Results section only presents and analyzes a limited subset of these findings, primarily focusing on CRP, ESR, and CBC parameters. The data from other tests like SGPT, creatinine, blood culture, and urinalysis are mentioned in Methods but not reported or analyzed in the Results. To maintain scientific rigor and completeness, either all laboratory data should be presented and analyzed to justify the term "laboratory profiles" in the title, or the title should be modified to reflect the actual scope of reported findings.

2. Your introduction requires updating with literature from 2022-2024 to better contextualize your findings within current Kawasaki Disease research. We recommend incorporating recent epidemiological data (especially from South Asia), modern diagnostic approaches, and contemporary treatment outcomes. While retaining seminal papers, please replace pre-2015 references with current evidence on regional epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, and treatment guidelines to strengthen your manuscript's relevance and contribution to the field.

3. Clarify diagnostic criteria used for incomplete KD.

4. The statistical methodology requires significant revision. While P-values are presented, the specific statistical tests used are not specified, and there is no sample size calculation or power analysis. The authors should clearly state which statistical tests were employed and provide justification for the sample size to ensure scientific validity.

5. Add multivariate analysis of risk factors for coronary involvement.

6. Figure 1 is overly simple - additional figures showing key findings would be valuable.

7. The Discussion section needs substantial revision as it currently focuses too heavily on restating results rather than interpretation and context. We recommend reducing the descriptive content of findings and expanding the analytical discussion, particularly comparing your results with contemporary literature and explaining the high rates of incomplete KD and coronary involvement observed in your study. Include more critical analysis of how your findings contribute to current understanding of Kawasaki Disease in South Asian populations.

8. The authors should strengthen the discussion by citing contemporary literature to explain why their study found unusually high rates of incomplete Kawasaki Disease (65%) and coronary involvement (95%) compared to global data, with particular focus on whether these findings reflect delayed diagnosis, regional genetic factors, or referral bias in their tertiary care setting.

Reviewer #2: 1. The dose of Aspirin in the acute phase may also affect the coronary artery on follow-up. It needs to be kept under consideration and can be included if it varies.

2. The article is an addition to the previous studies where atypical Kawasaki is increasing now.

**********

-->6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .-->

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Zhenglin chang

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Dr.Gunjan Baweja

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Oct 3;20(10):e0328443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328443.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


29 Jun 2025

Responses to the comments of the academic editor

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Response: We have now revised the manuscript to make this technically sound and the data now support the conclusion

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Response: Thanks. We have revised the statistical analysis section to make this more appropriate and rigorous ________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Response: Thanks. ________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Response: Thanks.________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript examines Kawasaki Disease in children at a Bangladeshi tertiary care hospital, providing valuable data through detailed clinical and laboratory profiles of 40 cases. While the study's strengths include clear documentation of treatment outcomes, several concerns need addressing - notably the unusually high rates of incomplete KD and coronary abnormalities, statistical rigor, methodology clarity, and limited discussion of findings in context of current literature. With appropriate revisions, this work could meaningfully contribute to understanding KD in Bangladesh.

Response: Thanks for your constructive review comments. We have revised the manuscript following your kind suggestions.

Major Comments:

1. While several laboratory tests were performed (CBC, ESR, CRP, SGPT, S. creatinine, blood C/S, Urine R/ME, C/S), the Results section only presents and analyzes a limited subset of these findings, primarily focusing on CRP, ESR, and CBC parameters. The data from other tests like SGPT, creatinine, blood culture, and urinalysis are mentioned in Methods but not reported or analyzed in the Results. To maintain scientific rigor and completeness, either all laboratory data should be presented and analyzed to justify the term "laboratory profiles" in the title, or the title should be modified to reflect the actual scope of reported findings.

Response: Thanks. We have provided the information of all mentioned investigations in the results (page 6 under table 1).

2. Your introduction requires updating with literature from 2022-2024 to better contextualize your findings within current Kawasaki Disease research. We recommend incorporating recent epidemiological data (especially from South Asia), modern diagnostic approaches, and contemporary treatment outcomes. While retaining seminal papers, please replace pre-2015 references with current evidence on regional epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, and treatment guidelines to strengthen your manuscript's relevance and contribution to the field.

Response: Thanks. We have revised the introduction section according to your kind suggestions on pages 3 & 3 under introduction.

3. Clarify diagnostic criteria used for incomplete KD.

Response: Thanks. It is now mentioned on pages 4 and 5 under section material and methods section.

4. The statistical methodology requires significant revision. While P-values are presented, the specific statistical tests used are not specified, and there is no sample size calculation or power analysis. The authors should clearly state which statistical tests were employed and provide justification for the sample size to ensure scientific validity.

Response: Thanks. This is an exploratory study where we enrolled all the children (n=40) diagnosed with KD between June 2019 to April 2023. However, we have performed the sample size calculation which has been mentioned on page under sample size on page 5. We have also done the power analysis of the study which is discussed on page 14, prior conclusion, under discussion section. Moreover, we have revised the statistical analysis plan according to the suggestion of the respected reviewer.

5. Add multivariate analysis of risk factors for coronary involvement.

Response: Thanks. We have introduced multiple logistic regression and mentioned this in the statistical analysis plan on page 6 (first paragraph) and results section (table V, page 10 on results section)

6. Figure 1 is overly simple - additional figures showing key findings would be valuable.

Response: Thanks. We have deleted this figure as this information is available in the results on page 6.

7. The Discussion section needs substantial revision as it currently focuses too heavily on restating results rather than interpretation and context. We recommend reducing the descriptive content of findings and expanding the analytical discussion, particularly comparing your results with contemporary literature and explaining the high rates of incomplete KD and coronary involvement observed in your study. Include more critical analysis of how your findings contribute to current understanding of Kawasaki Disease in South Asian populations.

Response: Thanks. We have revised discussion section on pages 11 to 13 addressing the above-mentioned suggestions.

8. The authors should strengthen the discussion by citing contemporary literature to explain why their study found unusually high rates of incomplete Kawasaki Disease (65%) and coronary involvement (95%) compared to global data, with particular focus on whether these findings reflect delayed diagnosis, regional genetic factors, or referral bias in their tertiary care setting.

Response: Thanks. We have done this accordingly throughout the manuscript and also in the reference list.

Reviewer #2: 1. The dose of Aspirin in the acute phase may also affect the coronary artery on follow-up. It needs to be kept under consideration and can be included if it varies.

Response: Thanks. We concur with the concern of the respected reviewer and. It is important to mention that we have used adequate dose of aspirin and mentioned in table III.

2. The article is an addition to the previous studies where atypical Kawasaki is increasing now.

Response: Many thanks for your positive comments.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_PONE-D-24-55276.docx

pone.0328443.s002.docx (17.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Jyoti Sharma

2 Jul 2025

Clinical & laboratory profiles and treatment outcome of Kawasaki Disease in children: Experience from a tertiary care hospital

PONE-D-24-55276R1

Dear Dr.Chisti,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jyoti Sharma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for thoughtfully addressing the reviewers' suggestions. The revisions have significantly enhanced the quality and clarity of the manuscript

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_PONE-D-24-55276.docx

    pone.0328443.s002.docx (17.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because of the fact that the data can only be shared publicly with the permission of Ethics Committee of BIRDEM. Data are available from the BIRDEM Institutional Ethics Committee (contact via professorahm@yahoo.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES