Abstract
Background
Calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neuraxis (CAPNON) are benign and slowly growing fibro-osseous lesions of the nervous system.
Methods
We report two rare cases of spinal CAPNON and provide a literature review.
Results
A 33-year-old woman with back pain underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealing a large intradural mass (1.5 × 0.9 × 10.6cm3) at L2-S1. Postoperative MRI scan performed 3 years after surgery confirmed no recurrence. A 64-year-old woman with lower limb numbness and gait instability underwent lumbar MRI, revealing an L3 intradural mass (1.1 × 0.3 × 1.6cm3). Lower limb numbness were resolved after surgery during 1 year follow-up.
Conclusion
Accurate recognition of CAPNON is essential to guide appropriate surgical intervention due to its favorable prognosis. In these situations, complete resection and radiological follow-up are highly recommended.
Keywords: Calcifying pseudoneoplasm, Spine, Surgery, Case report
Highlights
-
•
The first case of 10.6 cm intradural CAPNON in the lumbosacral canal spanning five spinal segments and we review the literature briefly.
-
•
Current recommendations for the management of spinal CAPNON are discussed.
-
•
Differentiation of spinal CAPNON from true tumors is critical to avoid unnecessary treatments due to its favorable prognosis.
1. Introduction
Calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neuraxis (CAPNON) are heavily calcified parenchymal lesions upon histopathology involving the central nervous system. The etiology of CAPNON is hypothesized to be reactive to trauma, inflammation, or hemorrhage. CAPNON rarely occurs in the spine and is seldom reported in the literature since the first description by Rhodes and Davis in 1978. To our knowledge, no previously reported CAPNON has exceeded three spinal segments in length. We herein describe the first case of an intradural CAPNON in the lumbosacral canal, measuring approximately 14 cm3 and spanning five spinal segments. This case report has been reported in line with the SCARE checklist [1].
2. Clinical presentation
2.1. Case 1
A 33-year-old woman with a 5-year history of progressively worsening low back pain without myelopathy/radiculopathy. On examination, her vital signs were stable. A neurological examination revealed normal muscle reflexes and negative lasegue's test. A renal computed tomographic (CT) scan incidentally identified a hyperdense lesion in the lumbosacral canal. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large intradural mass (1.5 × 0.9 × 10.6 cm3) at L2-S1. The lesion exhibited hypointensity on T1-weighted images, mixed signal intensity on T2-weighted images and no contrast enhancement (Fig.1). We obtained consent from the patient, and then surgical resection was performed via a posterior midline approach. After partial removal of L2-S1 lamina using high-speed burr without foraminotomy and facetectomy, a stonelike mass was found in the interlayer between the connective tissue membrane and the dura while being noted to be firmly adherent to the dura mater and roots, encased in a layer of connective tissue membrane resembling the dura mater in appearance. The lesion was meticulously dissected and completely resected for pathological examination. Subsequently, a watertight dural closure was obtained using a combination of sutures and fibrin sealant, with laminoplasty using titanium miniplates alone. Pathological examination showed amorphous calcifying masses with osseous metaplasia in a fibrovascular stroma. Immunohistochemistry revealed focal EMA positivity in spindle-formed stromal cells, suggesting arachnoid/choroidal plexus fibroblastic origin. Postoperatively, the patient's pain resolved completely with no recurrence at 3-year follow-up MRI.
Fig. 1.
(A) Pre-operative sagittal T1-weighted images demonstrating a hypointense intradural mass at the L2-S1 levels.(B) Sagittal T2-weighted images revealing a mixed-signal lesion. (C) Post-contrast sequences showing the mass within the right lateral aspect of the spinal canal. (D) Post-operative sagittal T1-weighted images showing the extradural mass was completely removed.(E) Axial T2-weighted images confirming the remaining cavity in the surgery area. (F) Post-contrast sequences illustrating no enhancement after surgery. (G) Intraoperative images demonstrating the lesion being completely resected along with its external capsule for pathological examination. (H)Tumor specimen showing prominent calcification and firm consistency, which complicated resection. (I) Immunohistochemical EMA showing positive expression of some spindle-shaped stromal cells, suggesting that the tumor may originate from fibroblasts in the arachnoid or choroidal plexus stroma.
2.2. Case 2
A 64-year-old woman presented with a two-month history of bilateral lower limb numbness and unsteady gait. Vital signs (BP, HR, RR, Spo2) were all within normal limits. Bilateral leg were elevated over 70° without pain. Symmetric reflexes were graded 2+. Lumbar MRI demonstrated a T1 hypointense, T2 heterogeneously intense intradural mass (1.1 × 0.3 × 1.6cm3) at L3, without contrast enhancement. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position. After partial removal of L3 lamina without foraminotomy and facetectomy, gross total resection was achieved through microscopic manipulation. The hypovascular mass was noted intraoperatively to be hard, greyish-white, and non-adherent to the dura or roots. Finally, we reattached the lamina using titanium miniplates and performed intradermic suture. Tumor specimen showed well-demarcated calcification alongside ossification, featuring palisading spindle-to-epithelioid cells, fibrous stroma, and multinucleated giant cells. Immunostaining revealed epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) positivity in spindle cells and CD68 (KP1) positivity in interstitial histiocytes (Fig.2). Postoperatively, pain resolved completely, with no recurrence during 1 year follow-up.
Fig. 2.
(A) Pre-operative sagittal T1-weighted images revealing a hypointense intradural mass at the L3 level. (B) Axial T2-weighted images showing the mass within the left posterolateral aspect of the spinal canal. (C) Post-contrast sequences demonstrating peripheral enhancement. (D) Post-operative sagittal T1-weighted images confirming the extradural mass was completely removed. (E) Axial T2-weighted images showing no remaining mass. (F) Post-contrast sequences revealing no postoperative enhancement. (G) Intraoperative images demonstrating resection via a posterior approach with a sharp scalpel blade through microscopic manipulation. (H) EMA immunostaining highlighting positive expression in interstitial spindle cells. (I) CD68 (KP1) immunostaining showing positivity in interstitial histiocytes.
3. Discussion
CAPNON are benign fibro-osseous lesions that mimic tumors but lack malignant potential [2]. Our literature review identified 296 potentially relevant publications. After applying inclusion criteria, only 83 histologically confirmed spinal CAPNON cases were reported (Table 1) [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. CAPNON most frequently occurred in adults (age range: 7–90 years), with female predilection (47 females, 36 males). Yet it's worth noting that most of the lesions in the spine were in the extradural space (55 located as extradural, 17 intradural, 2 transdural) (p < 0.0001). Further, CAPNONs were more likely to be located in the lumbar spine (41 cases) compared to cervical (19 cases) or thoracic (16 cases) (p < 0.0001).
Table 1.
Demographic, clinical, radiological and result of published cases of CAPNON, including our current cases.
| Case | Author | Age, sex | Clinical sign | Location | Radiographic findings Size |
Pathological findings | Surgical resection | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bertoni, 1990 | 23, M | Back pain 5 years | T10, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | HE: The granulomas were either nodular or confluent, producing a large mass with peripheral lobular configuration. Extrathelioid cells and giant cells bordered the granulomas. | ST | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 2 | 58, M | Intermittent low back pain 15 years, progressive stiffness 3 months | C2–3, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | Died | ||
| 3 | 12, M | Neck stiffness and pain 1 month | C6, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | No recurrence at 3 years | ||
| 4 | 32, M | Back pain many years | L4–5, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | No recurrence at 7 years | ||
| 5 | 33, F | Mid Back pain 3 months | T9, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | No recurrence at 1 mo | ||
| 6 | 68, F | Sciatica 5 months | L4–5, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | No recurrence at 1 year | ||
| 7 | 20, F | Incidental back pain 2 month | C1–2, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | Died | ||
| 8 | 56. F | Back pain 1 year | L4–5, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | ST | No recurrence at 1 mo | ||
| 9 | Moser, 1994 | 68, M | Left arm radicular pain 1 month | C7-T1, extradual | Hypointense on T1w, hyperintense on T2w with minimal peripheral enhancement | None | GT | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 10 | Smith, 1994 | 49, M | Left leg radicular pain 4 years | L2–3, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | GFAP(+) | ST | No recurrence at 4 mo |
| 11 | Qian, 1999 | 59, M | Neck pain 30 years | C1–2, extradual | N | None | GT | No recurrence at 4 years |
| 12 | 49, M | Left upper limb pain and sensory loss | Clivirus region | N | None | GT | No recurrence at 90 months | |
| 13 | Shrier,1999 | 59, M | Longstanding neck pain presented with shuffling gait and decreased sensation in the left hand | Foramen magnum | Hypointense on T1w and T2w with prominent contrast enhancement | GFAP(−),S100(−), HE:mature lamellar bone in a fibrous stroma. | GT | No recurrence at 2 years |
| 14 | Chang, 2000 | 60, M | Neck pain and stiffness 4 years | C2,intradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w with contrast enhancement, increased isotope uptake on bone scintigraphy | None | ST | No recurrence at 2 years |
| 15 | Mayr, 2000 | 58, M | Progressive jerkiness in lower extremities and worsening back pain 1 year | T10–12, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w with minimal peripheral enhancement | HE:Central calcified granular debris surronded by reactive tissue containing multinucleated giant cells | Debulking and biopsy | Non't mentioned |
| 16 | 63, M | Loss of feeling in arms below the elbows and gait dysfunction 3 months | C3–4, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | HE: degenerated calcified granular material surrounded by osteoclast-like giant cells | ST | No recurrence at 5 years | |
| 17 | Liccardo, 2003 | 40, M | Thoracic/chest pain 2 months | T8, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w without contrast enhancement | HE: a fibrotic area comprising calcifications and multinucleate giant cells | GT | No recurrence at 3 years |
| 18 | Park, 2008 | 59, F | Neck pain and left arm radicular pain 4 months | C7-T1, extradual | Isointense on T1w and T2w with minimal peripheral enhancement | HE: basophilic plates arranded in parallel with few nuclei scattered with them | GT | No recurrence at 1 mo |
| 19 | Apostolopoulos,2009 | 53, M | A long history of low back pain and a few months of occasional left groin pain | L1, intradural | With contrast enhancement | S100(−). HE:proliferation of spin- dle-shaped fibroblastic cells (F) and collections of calcified but not ossified matrix | GT | A small area of numbness of the left groin |
| 20 | Tong, 2010 | 67, F | Chronic lower back pain and inability to walk | L4–5, extradual | Multiple calcified foci on CT | HE: calcified fibro-osseous fragments and a nearly acellular chondromyxoid matrix | Debulking and biopsy | Non't mentioned |
| 21 | Rulseh, 2011 | 43, F | Recurrent low back pain and radicular pain | L3, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | HE: a calcified lesion consisting of primitive bone trabeculae and islets of choroid tissue in a moderately cellular matrix, scattered psammoma bodies and a fibrous stroma | GT | No recurrence at 10 mo |
| 22 | Ozdemir,2011 | 53,M | Left side of face pain 1 year | Foramen magnum | With contrast enhancement | None | GT | None |
| 23 | Muccio, 2012 | 57, M | Low back pain 4 years | T10–11, extradual | Hypointense on T1w, T2w and STIR without contrast enhancement | HE: the abnormal tissue is com- posed of mature bone (single asterisk) encincling a granulomatous tissue made up of nodular and confluent structures. | GT | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 24 | Kwan, 2012 | 48, M | Left chest and lower limb radicular pain 8 weeks | T9–10, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w without contrast enhancement | None | Indomethacin | No recurrence at 4 mo |
| 25 | Naidu, 2012 | 43, M | Low back pain and left leg radicular pain | L4, extradual | Iso-hyperintense on T1w, mixed hypointense and hyperintense on T2w, with diffuse reticular postcontrast enhancement | HE: numerous areas of osseous metaplasia | GT | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 26 | Nathoo,2012 | 44, F | Progressive left- sided flank pain 1 year | L4–5,extradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | HE: g concentric calcospherites (psammoma bodies) within the paucicellular, fibrosclerotic spindle cells | GT | No recurrence at 18 mo |
| 27 | Jentoft, 2012 [2] | 26, F | Low back pain | L1–2,intradural | Hypointense on T2w with minimal contrast enhancement | EMA and SMA (+). S100(+): An axon bundle within the substance of the pseudoneoplasm is highlighted. |
GT | No recurrence at 3 mo |
| 28 | Bartanusz, 2013 [3] | 22mo, F | Lateralized neck pain and torticollis | C1–2, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w with minimal peripheral contrast peripheral enhancement | CD68(+). S100(+): a fragment of dorsal root ganglion was involved by the lesion in addition to a fragment of nerve root. |
Debulking and biopsy | Non't mentioned |
| 29 | Song, 2015 [4] | 77, F | Low back pain and both legs radicular pain 2 years | T12, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | HE: fibrous collagenesis with granular calcification | GT | No recurrence at 5 mo |
| 30 | 67, F | Right leg radicular pain 2 months | L2–3, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | HE: extratheloid cells in a granuloma-like pattern, fibrocellular stroma with spindled fibroblastic cells, and calcified materials | GT | No recurrence at 2 mo | |
| 31 | 78, F | Low back pain 2 months | L1, extradual | Calcification of the lesion on CT | HE: chondromyxoid matrix in a nodular pattern, palisading spindle to extrathelioid cells, fibrous stroma, calcification, osseous metaplasia, or scattered psammoma bodies, and foreign body type reaction with giant cell | GT | No recurrence at 1 mo | |
| 32 | Reinard, 2015 [5] | 44, M | Low back pain with left anterior thigh and left lateral calf radicular pain 3 years | L4, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w with minimal contrast enhancement | EMA (+). The stromal component was non-reactive with CD34, a vascular marker. |
GT | No recurrence at 4 years |
| 33 | Kocovski, 2015 [6] | 64, F | Left low back pain with left leg radicular pain 6 months | L5-S1, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | HE: An extradural lesion with widespread amorphous and granular calcifying material and fibrous tissue | ST | No recurrence at 6 mo |
| 34 | Tao, 2015 [7] | 56, M | Low back pain 1 year | L1, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w, with minimal contrast enhancement | CD68(+),LCA(+),CD34(+), Desimin(−),EMA(−),Ki-67(1–10 %),PR9-,S-100(−), Vimentin(+), CK(−). | GT | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 35 | Singh, 2016 [8] | 90, F | Worsening lower extremity weakness 2–3 months | C7-T1, extradual | Isohypointense on T2w | HE: nodules composed of dense fibrous connective tissue with irregular layers of calcification, heavy central calcification, and a more cellular zone at the periphery of the nodule | ST | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 36 | Lopes, 2016 [9] | 72, F | Longstanding history of low back pain, cauda equina syndrome 20 days | L2,intradural | Hyperdense lesion on CT hypointense on T1w and T2w without contrast enhancement, no oedema |
GFAP(+), EMA(+), SMA(+) | GT | No recurrence at 3 mo |
| 37 | Duque, 2016 [10] | 51, F | Low back pain and both legs radicular pain 3 months | L2, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w without contrast enhancement, no oedema | HE: extratheloid cells in a granuloma- like pattern, fibrocellular stroma with spindled fibroblastic cells, and calcified materials | GT | No recurrence at 3 years |
| 38 | 46, F | Posterior neck pain 1 year | C3,intradural | Calcified intraosseous lesion on CT | HE: a typical chondromyxoid matrix in a nodular pattern with palisading spindles and extrathelioid and scattered psammoma bodies | GT | No recurrence at 2 years | |
| 39 | 73, M | Progressive paraparesis 6 month | T2, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | HE: a chondroid matrix with abundant fibrovascular stroma and a focal area of osseous metaplasia, | GT | No recurrence at 1 year | |
| 40 | Giardinaet, 2016 [11] | 68, M | Low back pain radiating into his right leg 6 month | L4–5,intradural | Isoipointense to the spinal cord on both T1w and T2w, without surrounding edema | HE: Spindle and extrathelioid cells bordered the chondromyxoid matrix nodules | GT | No recurrence at 5 years |
| 41 | Wu, 2017 [12] | 39, F | Intermittent sacrococcygeal pain 17 years | S2,intradural | Calcification of the lesion and erosion of the vertebral arch on CT, hypointense on T1w, isohypointense on T2w with minimal contrast enhancement | HE: characteristic acellular chondromyxoidmatrix, including spindle extrathelial cells with calcium deposits and psammomatous bodies | GT | No recurrence at 3 years |
| 42 | Boschi, 2020 [13] | 44, F | Back pain 2 months | T6–7, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | None | Indomethacin | No recurrence at 3 mo |
| 43 | Yang,2020 [14] | 64, F | Left-sided neck pain 2 years following a fall | C2–4,extradual | Calcified nodules on CT and heterogeneous contrast enhancement on MRI | Neurofilament-light(+++) | GT | Stable at 2 years |
| 44 | 60, M | Cervical myelopathy 3 weeks | C7,extradural | Isointense on T1w and T2w | Neurofilament-light(+++) | GT | Stable at 7 mos, improved myelopathy | |
| 45 | 51, F | Lower back pain 2 years | L3–4,extradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | Neurofilament-light(+++) | Debulking and biopsy | Stable at 2 mos | |
| 46 | 64, F | Lower back pain 6 months | L5-S1, extradural | Hypointense on T1w and signal void on T2w | Neurofilament-light(++), Neurofilament-phosphorylated(−) | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo | |
| 47 | Lu, 2020 [15] | 51, F | Lower back pain over 2 years | L3–4,extradural | Hypointense on T1w, mixed hypointense and hyperintense on T2w | HE: fibrous connective tissue containing granular amorphous or dystrophic calcified cores with palisading spindle to extrathelioid cells, fibrous stroma, and scattered CD68+ macrophages including occasional multinucleated giant cells | GT | No recurrence at 2 mo |
| 48 | Ho,2020 [16] | 75, M | None | T11 | None | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, no surrounding meningothelial cells | None | None |
| 49 | 52, M | T7–8 | None | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 50 | 74, F | L5-S1 | None | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding no meningothelial cells | ||||
| 51 | 68, F | L4–5 | None | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding no meningothelial cells | ||||
| 52 | 49, M | L4–5, intradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | Classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, no surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 53 | 43, F | T10–11, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and hypointense on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 54 | 70, F | L4–5, transdural | Hypointense on T1w and hyperintense on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 55 | 67, F | L4–5, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and T2w | Classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 56 | 83, F | L3–4, extradural | Hypointense on T1w and hyperintense on T2w | Classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 57 | 71, F | L5-S1,transdura | Hyperintense on T1w and T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 58 | 50, F | L5, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and hypointense on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 59 | 39, F | T9–10, Extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and hypointense on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 60 | 65, M | L2–3, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 61 | 7, F | T2–3, extradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 62 | 78, M | T9–10, extradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 63 | 58, M | L2–3, intradural | Hyperintense on T1w and hypointense on T2w | Classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 64 | 77, M | C7-T1, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and hypointense on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 65 | 65, M | L3–4, transdural | Hypointense on T1w and on T2w | Classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 66 | 71, F | L1–2, intradural | Hypointense on T1w and on T2w | Classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 67 | 86, M | Atlantooccipital, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 68 | 82, F | L4–5, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 69 | 56, F | L4–5, transdural | Hyperintense on T1w and on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, no surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 70 | 45, F | L4–5, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, no coarse and amorphous calcification, no surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 71 | 43, M | T9-10, extradural | Hyperintense on T1w and on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding no meningothelial cells | ||||
| 72 | 52, F | C7-T1, extradural | Hypointense on T1w and on T2w | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, no surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 73 | 64,M | C6 | None | NO classic chondromyxoid matrix, coarse and amorphous calcification, surrongding meningothelial cells | ||||
| 74 | Ravi, 2021 [17] | 53, F | Back pain with right leg radicular pain 3 years | L5,intradural | Isointense on T1w and T2w | HE: histiocytes and giant cells at the periphery of a chondromyxoid area. | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo |
| 75 | Lu,2022 [18] | 64,F | Lateralized neck pain and torticollis 2 months | C3–4, extradual | Internal cystic components on T2w and heterogeneous enhancement on coronal T1 post-contrast enhanced | NF-L(+++), 7 CD8+ cells of 10 consecutive high-power fields in the most frequent positive cells | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo |
| 76 | 60,M | Back pain with right leg radicular pain 1 years | L2-3, extradual | Isointense on T1w and T2w | NF-L(++), 37 CD8+ cells of 10 consecutive high-power fields in the most frequent positive cells | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo | |
| 77 | 71,F | Back pain 2 months | L2–4,intradural | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | NF-L(++), 25 CD8+ cells of 10 consecutive high-power fields in the most frequent positive cells | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo | |
| 78 | 51,F | Neck pain and left arm radicular pain 3 months | C3–5, extradual | Isointense on T1w and T2w | NF-L(+++), 181 CD8+ cells of 10 consecutive high-power fields in the most frequent positive cells | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo | |
| 79 | 64,F | Right leg radicular pain 3 months | L3-5, extradual | Hypointense on T1w and T2w | NF-L(++), 14 CD8+ cells of 10 consecutive high-power fields in the most frequent positive cells | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo | |
| 80 | Omar,2024 [19] | 35, M | Neck pain 6 months | C1, intradual extramedullary | Isointense on T1w and T2w | HE: peripheral cell palisading with multinucleatd giant cells | GT | No recurrence at 6 mo |
| 81 | Ajay,2024 [20] | 66,F | Back pain and burning sensation in thigh | T11–12, intradual | Hypotense on T1w and T2w | HE: abundant hypocellular basophilic amorphous to fibrillated material with ghost cells, consistent with the characteristic chondromyxoid fibrillary matrix of CAPNON | GT | No recurrence at 6 weeks |
| 82 | Current cases | 33,F | Back pain 5 years | L2-S1, intradual | Hypointense on T1w and mixed-signal on T2w | EMA(+). HE: Amorphous calcifying masses with osseous metaplasia and fibrovascular stroma in the lesion. | GT | No recurrence at 4 years |
| 83 | 64,F | Lower limb numbness and walking unstable 2 moths | L3, intradural | hypointense on T1w and mixed-signal on T2w | EMA(+). HE: Tumor nodular growth with clear boundaries, visible calcification and ossification. Granular amorphous cores with calcification, peripheral palisading of spindle to extrathelioid cells, fibrous stroma and multinucleated giant cells. | GT | No recurrence at 1 year |
Abbreviations CT, computed tomography; EMA, extrathelial membrane antigen; F, female; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GT, gross total resection; M, male; mo, months; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SMA, smooth muscle actin; ST, subtotal resection; T1w, T1-weighted imaging; T2w, T2-weighted imaging; yrs., years.
Clinical presentation of radicular pain and sensorimotor deficits correlated with lesion location along dermatomal/myotomal distributions (Table 1). Patients were more likely to present with back pain (30 cases) than neck pain(11 cases) or leg pain(13 cases) (p = 0.0001), consistent with the lumbar predominance of these lesions. Notably, gait dysfunction occurred in one patient with a C3-C4 lesion and another with an L4-L5 level lesion, likely due to spinal cord or nerve root compression.
Imaging plays a crucial role in differentiating CAPNON from meningioma, oligodendroglioma, metastasis of calcified hematoma. CT typically reveals hyperdense calcifications. On MRI, lesions exhibit T2-weighted hypointensity due to calcification and may show variable enhancement, but lack typical meningioma features such as dural tails. Psammomatous meningiomas generally exhibit isointensity on T1 and heterogenous signal on T2, while metaplastic meningiomas show hypo-to isointensity on T1 or hypointensity on T2. Calcified meningiomas display perilesional edema more prominently than CAPNON. Additional entities like chordoma, chondrosarcoma and vestibular schwannoma typically appear as high signal on T2 with variable enhancement.
CAPNONs manifest as firm, well-circumscribed, and calcified lesions, which complicate surgical resection and necessitate prolonged operative times particularly for lengthy lesions such as case 1. Histopathology reveals a nodular chondromyxoid matrix with palisading spindles-to-epithelioid forms, fibrous stroma, psammoma bodies, and foreign-body reaction with giant cells. Focal EMA expression localized to arachnoid-related cells helps distinguish CAPNON from meningiomas, which show diffuse EMA positivity. The histologic variety supports a reactive etiology, possibly triggered by trauma, bacterial involvement, or inflammation. Meantime, the absent ribbon-like cells and vacuolated cytoplasmic textures renders chordomas unlikely. Finally, the lack of lymphocytes and Langhans giant cells excludes tuberculoma and bacterial pathogenesis. In our case, we report two positive focal EMA staining with one positive CD68 staining, which optimally established a consistent and steadfast immunohistochemical marker relevant to spinal CAPNON lesions.
Surgical excision remains the primary remedy, excluding two cases managed successfully with indomethacin 25 mg three times daily through inhibition of prostaglandin PGE2 which is an agent associated with heterotopic ossification processes. Misdiagnosis could lead to unnecessarily aggressive resection planned for chordomas, while CAPNON allows capsular preservation to avoid neurovascular injuries. Adjuvant therapies are ineffective. Gross total resection (38 cases) surpasses subtotal resection (13 cases) in frequency(p < 0.0001). Overall, an average follow-up time lasted approximately 12.4 months. Remarkably, our case study documented symptomatic relief upon discharge, adding to the large number of cases that indicate prompt ameliorative outcomes after operative CAPNON excisions.
4. Conclusions
Spinal CAPNON mostly located within the lumbar vertebrae, presented with low back pain and typically appeared T2-weighted hypointense on MRI sequences. Given that surgical excision is curative, differentiation from malignant tumors is required to avoid adjuvant therapy. Ongoing research is expected to further elucidate its underlying pathogenesis and refine optimal treatment strategies.
Ethical approval
Ethics approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Changzheng Hospital (IRB number 2025-13).
Guarantor
The guarantor (Zhang Dan-Feng) and all other authors agree with the work of the study to publish.
Research registration number
No.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271396).
Author contribution
Han Shuo: Writing-original draft, Supervision. Wang Guang-Ming: Conceptualization, Methodology. Dai Da-Wei: Supervision, Data curation and original data provision. Zhang Dan-Feng: Editing-original draft, Fund provision.
Conflict of interest statement
No.
Contributor Information
Da-Wei Dai, Email: 18217755580@139.com.
Dan-Feng Zhang, Email: 18964152882@163.com.
References
- 1.Kerwan A., Al-Jabir A., Mathew G., Sohrabi C., Rashid R., Franchi T., Nicola M., Agha M., Agha R.A. Revised Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guideline: an update for the age of artificial intelligence. Prem. J. Sci. 2025;10(5):100079. doi: 10.70389/PJS.100079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jentoft M.E., Scheithauer B.W., Bertoni F., Abood C., Chang H.T. Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis with single nerve rootlet involvement. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2012;39(November(39)):840–842. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100015730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bartanusz V., Ziu M., Jimenez D.F., Henry J.M. Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the atlantoaxial joint in a child. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2013;18(April(4)):367–371. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.spine12810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Song S.Y., Ahn S.Y., Rhee J.J., Lee J.W., Hur J.W., Lee H.K. Three cases of calcifying Pseudoneoplasm which involve the epidural space of the spine. Korean. J. Spine. 2015;September(12:235–238. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2015.12.3.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reinard K., Seyfried D., Gutierrez J., Rock J. A rare intradural extramedullary calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the spine presenting with radiculopathy. British. J. Med. R. 2015;7:419–424. doi: 10.9734/BJMMR/2015/16543. (Marh 93) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kocovski L., Parasu N., Provias J.P., Popovic S. Radiologic and histopathologic features of calcifying Pseudoneoplasm of the neural Axis. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2015;66(May(2)):108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ben-Zhang T., Hai-Hao G., Wei-Jun W., Fu-Lin W., Ai-Jia S., O D. Neurosurgery: diagnosis and treatment of calcifying pseudoneoplasm of thoracic spine. J. Regional. Ana. 2015;37(June(6)):112–115. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Singh H., Zengou R., Moss I.L. Intradural calcifying pseudoneoplasm. Spine J. 2016;16(January(1)) doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lopes A.J., Brock R.S., Martins T.G., de Medeiro R.S., Montezzo D., de Oliveira M.F., Teixeira M.J. Intradural calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis presenting as a cauda equina syndrome. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2016;7(December26):S1102–s1105. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.196771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.García Duque S., Medina Lopez D., Ortiz de Méndivil A., Fernández J. Diamantopoulos. Calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neuraxis: report on four cases and review of the literature. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2016;143(April(5)):116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.G. G. Giardina F., Righi A., Bertoni F. Calcifying Pseudotumor of the spine: a case report, clinics. In. Surgery. 2016;1(June(4)):1042–1044. doi: 10.25107/2474-1647.1042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu H.G., Yue L., Luo C.J., Wei Z.H., Wang S., Zheng N.D. Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis arising from the sacral canal: case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2017;98(Febuary(875)) doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boschi A., Pisano A., Romoli S. Calcifying Pseudoneoplasms of the neuraxis: not only surgical treatment. Asian. J. Neurosurg. 2020;15(August(28)):796–797. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_113_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang K., Reddy K., Wang B.H., Cenic A., Lu J.Q. Immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021;48(MArch(2)):1–20. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lu J.Q., Popovic S., Provias J., Cenic A. Collision lesions of calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis and rheumatoid nodules: a case report with new pathogenic insights. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2021;29(3):314–320. doi: 10.1177/1066896920941939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ho M.L., Eschbacher K.L., Paolini M.A., Raghunathan A. New insights into calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis (CAPNON): a 20-year radiological-pathological study of 37 cases. Histopathology. 2020;76(7):1055–1069. doi: 10.1111/his.14066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ravi V., Srinath P. A rare case of calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neural axis in Lumbar Spine. Indian. J. Neurosurgery. 2021;11(1):177–180. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lu J.Q., Al Mohammadi W.J.B., Fong C., Yang K., Moodley J., Provias J., Popovic S., Chebib I., Cenic A. Spinal calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis (CAPNON) and CAPNON-like lesions: CAPNON overlapping with calcified synovial cysts. Pathology. 2022;54(august(5)):573–579. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Atallah O., Kurian K.M., Teo M. Calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neuraxis (CAPNON) in foramen magnum (cervicomedullary junction) region: a case report and review of the literature. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2024;13(April(3)):1–6. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2024.2339354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chatrath A., Lemieux M., Patel R.P., Roberts K.F., Dahiya S., Pennicooke B. Spinal calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neuraxis: a case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurgery: X. 2024;23(febuary(23)) doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


