Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is marked by accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and abnormal tau, associated with subsequent neurodegeneration. Validated markers of neurodegeneration include brain glucose metabolism, perfusion and atrophy. Dual-phase amyloid PET imaging allows to assess both Aβ buildup and perfusion changes through a single tracer injection. Increasing evidence supports the comparability of early-phase amyloid PET scans and glucose metabolism changes assessed by 18F-FDG PET at group and individual levels, regardless of the amyloid tracers and the disease, emphasizing the added value of dual-phase amyloid PET imaging protocols for clinical and research settings.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, imaging
Amyloid PET, which assesses brain amyloid deposition, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET, which assesses glucose metabolism, provide valuable and complementary information for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases. 1 Extensive research indicates that integrating multiple biomarkers—whether PET-based or not—enhances diagnostic precision. 2 While a recent set of diagnostic criteria proposes that a positive amyloid status, assessed by amyloid PET or fluid biomarkers, could be necessary and sufficient for AD diagnosis, 3 18F-FDG PET as measure of neurodegeneration adds important steps in terms of disease staging, clinical outcomes and presence of other pathologies. 4 18F-FDG PET also allows assessment of the extent and location of hypometabolism specific for neurodegenerative diseases other than AD, helping in differential diagnosis and giving insight about heterogeneity. 2 The importance of this additional information is well consolidated in the recent intersocietal recommendations for a biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders, which gives a prominent role to 18F-FDG PET. 2
Dual-phase protocol for amyloid PET data acquisition has proven to be able to evaluate brain amyloidosis and neurodegeneration at the same time, adding to the reference late acquisition a short acquisition of the tracer distribution immediately after injection. The optimal early time frame has been usually investigated based on the best within- or inter-subject correlation with 18F-FDG PET, achieving the best association with a 5- to 10-min acquisition with some tracer-related differences.5–7 In this way, dual-phase protocol provides a perfusion measure very close to metabolism through the early-phase scan because of the high lipophilicity of the tracers8,9 and the neurovascular coupling for which cerebral perfusion is strongly related to metabolic consumption in aging and dementia conditions.10,11 Using different amyloid tracers, early-phase amyloid PET has demonstrated strong concordance with 18F-FDG PET uptake at the group level, supporting its potential as a surrogate marker for neuronal dysfunction in AD and non-AD.5–7,12–20 Some differences in underlying biological mechanisms and regional uptakes between the two modalities have been recognized without impacting on the overall good concordance. For instance, 18F-FDG-PET has a slow and steady uptake, while blood flow has a high extraction in the first passage, which is however tracer-specific. 18F-FDG-PET is associated with active cellular uptake, likely involving glial cells, which may not be observed in perfusion examinations.21,22 Regarding regional differences between the two modalities, low cerebellar metabolism was found on 18F-FDG-PET and higher medial temporal perfusion and perfusion in the thalamus and the brainstem in early-phase amyloid PET. 23
The applicability of dual-phase amyloid PET at single-subject level has been first demonstrated using 18F-Florbetapir and 18F-Flutemetamol tracers, showing a comparable distribution of perfusion to metabolism and a comparable ability in excluding the presence of neurodegeneration. 24 In line with the strong relationship between hypometabolism and cognitive performance, 4 perfusion also showed a comparable good correlation with Mini-Mental State Examination scores. 24 Lojo-Ramírez and colleagues confirmed the applicability of dual-phase amyloid-PET at single-subject level also using 18F-Florbetaben. 25 They further supported the robustness of early-phase 18F-Florbetaben PET as a surrogate biomarker for neurodegeneration, independent of amyloid and clinical status. Indeed, the hypoperfusion patterns found by single-subject voxel-wise t-maps identified neurodegenerative patterns similar to those seen in 18F-FDG PET, allowing neuroimaging experts to have the same rating for two image modalities and supporting clinical translation. 25 An important added value of this additional measure of neurodegeneration is the ability to assess, in amyloid positive cases, the presence of neurodegeneration that allows linking the underlying pathology with the presence of clinical signs and symptoms, while in amyloid negative cases the presence or absence of specific hypoperfusion patterns can provide elements supporting alternative degenerative or non-degenerative etiologies. 19
The sample included in the study by Lojo-Ramirez et al. 25 evaluated mainly prodromal and dementia patients, leaving open the question about the suitability of early-phase PET for individuals in preclinical phases, such as subjective cognitive decline, when brain metabolic changes can be already present 26 and 18F-FDG PET might be more accurate. 24 In this framework, the sensitivity of early-phase amyloid PET to predict clinical progression in a specific preclinical population needs to be addressed.
Other open issues still need to be considered. Semi-quantification is strongly recommended in conjunction with visual reading by several clinical consensus, the official recommendations by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), to perform high-quality reads of 18F-FDG-PET in the clinical setting and freeware and commercial software are available on different methods for 18F-FDG-PET. Among semi-quantification methods, voxel-based single-subject analysis has been suggested in common practice guidelines for supporting visual interpretation of brain 18F-FDG-PET,27,28 and a comparable approach is likewise desirable for perfusion imaging. However, a healthy control (HC) dataset is essential for achieving strong performance in voxel-wise analyses and methods for early-phase images are less developed compared to those for 18F-FDG-PET. The use of 18F-FDG-PET HC datasets for the analysis of early-phase images has been tested but is suboptimal given the systematic differences in regional uptakes of the tracers. Although artificial intelligence strategies have been tested to correct these systematic differences, 29 public datasets of normal controls for early-phase imaging are desirable, largely encouraged and in development by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). In this view, formal training of physicians in the field would also be necessary for perfusion PET scans. 27 Moreover, it is important to consider that perfusion images as well as 18F-FDG-PET can suffer from biases in the presence of severe atrophy and cerebral vascular disease.11,24 Thus, structural images acquired in combination with PET or close to it are crucial for adequate image interpretation. In addition, blood glucose level limits 18F-FDG uptake in the brain and thus its use in diabetic patients, 30 and its effect on early-phase amyloid scanning, which is expected to be lower, should be explored.
Lastly, the lack of reimbursement for amyloid PET can represent a limit for its wide clinical implementation for some countries that needs to be taken into account.
Overall, the possibility of acquiring information about amyloidosis and neurodegeneration with a single tracer injection offered by dual-phase PET protocol represents a clear advantage in terms of radiation exposure and potentially in terms of costs. Multiple studies at group and individual levels support the readiness of dual-phase amyloid PET to be included in routine clinical practice, and emerging evidence is also paving the way toward achieving similar results for the early-phase imaging of tau PET.31–34
Acknowledgements
The authors have no acknowledgments to report.
Footnotes
ORCID iDs: Cecilia Boccalini https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3518-436X
Valentina Garibotto https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2422-698X
Author contributions: Cecilia Boccalini: Conceptualization; Investigation; Writing – original draft.
Valentina Garibotto: Conceptualization; Investigation; Resources; Supervision; Validation; Writing – review & editing.
Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Competitive research projects have been funded by: H2020 (projects n. 667375), Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI contract n. 115736 and 115952), IMI2, Swiss National Science Foundation ((projects 320030_169876, 320030_185028, and 320030_220099), VELUX Foundation, and the Schmidheiny foundation.
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: VG received research support and speaker fees through her institution from GE Healthcare, Siemens Healthineers, and Novartis.
References
- 1.Chételat G, Arbizu J, Barthel H, et al. Amyloid-PET and 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19: 951–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Frisoni GB, Festari C, Massa F, et al. European intersocietal recommendations for the biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23: 302–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jack CR, Jr, Andrews JS, Beach TG, et al. Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s association workgroup. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20: 5143–5169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boccalini C, Ribaldi F, Hristovska I, et al. The impact of tau deposition and hypometabolism on cognitive impairment and longitudinal cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20: 221–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hsiao IT, Huang CC, Hsieh CJ, et al. Correlation of early-phase 18F-florbetapir (AV-45/Amyvid) PET images to FDG images: preliminary studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39: 613–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vanhoutte M, Landeau B, Sherif S, et al. Evaluation of the early-phase [18F]AV45 PET as an optimal surrogate of [18F]FDG PET in ageing and Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 31: 102750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ottoy J, Verhaeghe J, Niemantsverdriet E, et al. 18F-FDG PET, the early phases and the delivery rate of 18F-AV45 PET as proxies of cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer’s disease: validation against 15O-H2O PET. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 15: 1172–1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gjedde A, Aanerud J, Braendgaard H, et al. Blood-brain transfer of Pittsburgh compound B in humans. Front Aging Neurosci 2013; 5: 70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Garibotto V, Morbelli S, Pagani M. Dual-phase amyloid PET: hitting two birds with one stone. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 43: 1300–1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jueptner M, Weiller C. Does measurement of regional cerebral blood flow reflect synaptic activity?—Implications for PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 1995; 2: 148–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Silverman DHS. Brain 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias: comparison with perfusion SPECT and with clinical evaluations lacking nuclear imaging. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 594–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Forsberg A, Engler H, Blomquist G, et al. The use of PIB-PET as a dual pathological and functional biomarker in AD. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1822: 380–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Carter SF, Chiotis K, et al. Comparison of early-phase 11C-deuterium-L-deprenyl and 11C-Pittsburgh compound B PET for assessing brain perfusion in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med 2016; 57: 1071–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tiepolt S, Hesse S, Patt M, et al. Early [18F]florbetaben and [11C]PiB PET images are a surrogate biomarker of neuronal injury in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 43: 1700–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seiffert AP, Gómez-Grande A, Villarejo-Galende A, et al. High correlation of static first-minute-frame (fmf) pet imaging after18f-labeled amyloid tracer injection with [18f]fdg pet imaging. Sensors 2021; 21: 5182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meyer PT, Hellwig S, Amtage F, et al. Dual-biomarker imaging of regional cerebral amyloid load and neuronal activity in dementia with PET and11C-labeled Pittsburgh compound B. J Nucl Med 2011; 52: 393–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rostomian AH, Madison C, Rabinovici GD, et al. Early 11C-PIB frames and 18F-FDG PET measures are comparable: a study validated in a cohort of AD and FTLD patients. J Nucl Med 2011; 52: 173–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Leuzy A, Chiotis K, et al. Comparability of [18F]THK5317 and [11C]PIB blood flow proxy images with [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017; 37: 740–749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Daerr S, Brendel M, Zach C, et al. Evaluation of early-phase [18F]-florbetaben PET acquisition in clinical routine cases. Neuroimage Clin 2017; 14: 77–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peretti DE, García DV, Reesink FE, et al. Relative cerebral flow from dynamic PIB scans as an alternative for FDG scans in Alzheimer’s disease PET studies. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0211000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chételat G, Arbizu J, Barthel H, et al. Amyloid-PET and 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19: 951–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zimmer ER, Parent MJ, Souza DG, et al. [18f]FDG PET signal is driven by astroglial glutamate transport. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20: 393–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carneiro CdG, Faria DdP, Coutinho AM, et al. Evaluation of 10-min post-injection 11C-PiB PET and its correlation with 18F-FDG PET in older adults who are cognitively healthy, mildly impaired, or with probable Alzheimer’s disease. Brazilian J Psychiatry 2022; 44: 495–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boccalini C, Peretti DE, Ribaldi F, et al. Early-phase 18 F-Florbetapir and 18 F-Flutemetamol images as proxies of brain metabolism in a memory clinic setting. J Nucl Med 2022; 64: 266–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lojo-Ramírez JA, Fernández-Rodríguez P, Guerra-Gómez M, et al. Evaluation of early-phase F-Florbetaben PET as a surrogate biomarker of neurodegeneration: in-depth comparison with 18 F-FDG PET at group and single patient level. J Alzheimers Dis 2025; 106: 304–316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tondo G, Boccalini C, Vanoli EG, et al. Brain metabolism and amyloid load in individuals with subjective cognitive decline or pre–mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2022; 99: e258–e269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arbizu J, Morbelli S, Minoshima S, et al. SNMMI Procedure standard/EANM practice guideline for brain [18F]FDG PET imaging, version 2.0. J Nucl Med 2025; 66: S45–S60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guedj E, Varrone A, Boellaard R, et al. EANM Procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [18F]FDG, version 3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49: 632–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanaat A, Boccalini C, Mathoux G, et al. A deep learning model for generating [18F]FDG PET images from early-phase [18F]Florbetapir and [18F]Flutemetamol PET images. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51: 3518–3531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Apostolova I, Lange C, Suppa P, et al. Impact of plasma glucose level on the pattern of brain FDG uptake and the predictive power of FDG PET in mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45: 1417–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boccalini C, Peretti DE, Mathoux G, et al. Early-phase 18F-Flortaucipir tau-PET as a proxy of brain metabolism in Alzheimer's disease: a comparison with 18F-FDG-PET and early-phase amyloid-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025; 52: 1958–1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Völter F, Beyer L, Eckenweber F, et al. Assessment of perfusion deficit with early phases of [18F]PI-2620 tau-PET versus [18F]flutemetamol-amyloid-PET recordings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 50: 1384–1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Beyer L, Nitschmann A, Barthel H, et al. Early-phase [18F]PI-2620 tau-PET imaging as a surrogate marker of neuronal injury. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47: 2911–2922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hammes J, Leuwer I, Bischof GN, et al. Multimodal correlation of dynamic [18F]-AV-1451 perfusion PET and neuronal hypometabolism in [18F]-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44: 2249–2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
