Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2025 Sep 19;2025:10.17912/micropub.biology.001812. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001812

Exclusion of the endoplasmic reticulum from the C. elegans meiotic spindle controls spindle size

Alma Aquino 1, Francis McNally 1,§
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC12495482  PMID: 41050326

Abstract

The nuclear envelope is composed of sheet-like ER that separates chromatin from tubulin during interphase. During oocyte maturation in C. elegans , a fenestrated envelope of sheet-like ER continues to envelope the meiotic spindle through metaphase I. ER is thus excluded from the nuclear/spindle volume during spindle assembly. To test the importance of this exclusion, we forced ER into the meiotic spindle by coupling kinesin motor domains to the ER. Forcing ER into the spindle interior caused a statistically significant increase in metaphase spindle width. Exclusion of ER from the spindle thus affects spindle geometry.


Figure 1. Optogenetically attaching kinesin motor heads to the ER leads to the ER invading the meiotic spindle space, increasing spindle width.

Figure 1. Optogenetically attaching kinesin motor heads to the ER leads to the ER invading the meiotic spindle space, increasing spindle width.

A-E. Representative images from time-lapse sequence of F22B5.10 (ER)::GFP::SSPB (green) and mKate tubulin (red) in -1 oocytes and metaphase I meiotic embryos. Magnified images of the spindle region are shown in A'-C'. F. Metaphase I spindle length measurements. G. Metaphase I spindle width measurements. H-K. Normalized fluorescence intensity along a 5 pixel wide line drawn down the length of the metaphase I spindle. Red = mKate::tubulin. Green = GFP::ER. Solid line is the mean of 10 spindles. Shaded region is the standard error of the mean of 10 spindles. Bar: 10um. ns not significant, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p< 0.001, **** p<0.0001 One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons test conducted with Graphpad Prism.

Description

During interphase, the nuclear envelope separates tubulin from chromatin thus providing one universal mechanism preventing spindle assembly before DNA replication. Upon entry into M-phase in many cell types, a remnant of the nuclear envelope consisting of fenestrated ER sheets continues to envelope the mitotic spindle as it assembles, allowing entry of tubulin dimers but excluding ER and other membranes from the spindle (Lu et al., 2009; Smyth et al., 2012; Schweizer et al., 2015). ER sheets also envelope the C. elegans oocyte meiotic spindle as it assembles and ER, mitochondria, and yolk granules are all excluded from the nuclear/spindle volume through metaphase I (Gong et al. 2024). The significance of excluding ER and other organelles from the spindle interior has been difficult to test. In Hela cells, expression of a non-phosphorylatable STIM1 caused penetration of ER into the mitotic spindle but no effect on spindle structure or function was demonstrated (Smyth et al., 2012).

Here we caused penetration of the ER into the C. elegans metaphase I female meiotic spindle by optogenetically coupling kinesin motor domains to either of two transmembrane proteins of the ER, ZK418.5 (homologous to human TMEM147) or F22B5.10 (homologous to human TMCO1). iLID and SSPB are proteins engineered to bind with higher affinity when exposed to blue light (Guntas et al., 2015). Co-expression of K420::mKate::iLID (kinesin motor domains with no cargo-binding tail) with ZK418.5 ::GFP::SSPB was previously shown to transiently pack ER into the center of the most mature prophase-arrested oocytes adjacent to the spermatheca (-1 oocytes) (Aquino et al., 2025) because microtubule plus ends are thought to extend inward from the plasma membrane. Co-expression of K420::mKate::iLID with F22B5.10 ::GFP::SSPB also caused inward packing of ER in -1 oocytes ( Fig. 1D arrowhead). Co-expression of either of these transgene pairs also caused the ER to invade the metaphase I spindle volume ( Fig. 1A '-C', Fig. 1H- 1K). Neither transgene pair caused a significant reduction in hatch rates (Aquino et al., 2025) indicating that meiosis proceeded somewhat normally. Expression of each transgene pair caused a significant increase in spindle width ( Fig. 1G ) but not length ( Fig. 1F ) relative to each transgene alone. This result indicates that failure to exclude ER from the spindle volume causes a change in spindle geometry that is not essential for meiotic progression. Because we did not monitor chromosomes and because trisomies are viable in C. elegans (Gong and McNally, 2023), we cannot conclude whether meiotic chromosome segregation was completely normal.

Methods

Optogenetic chimaeras were assembled with germline-optimized (Fielmich et al., 2018), versions of GFP, mKate, SSPB and iLID, and PCR amplified genomic regions of UNC-116 , F22B5.10 and mex-5 promoter and tbb-2 3'UTR in the RMCE vector pLF3FShC (Nonet, 2020) as described previously (Aquino et al., 2025). K420::mKate::iLID was inserted at the jsTi1490 chromosome IV landing site in NM5176 . All SSPB transgenes were inserted at the jsSi1579 chromosome II landing site in NM5402 and FLP recombinase was removed by outcrossing.

For time-lapse imaging, anesthetized worms were mounted between an agarose pad and coverslip as described in (Danlasky et al., 2020) and subjected to single plane time-lapse imaging on a Yokogawa CSU10 spinning disk confocal microscope equipped with an Olympus 100X 1.3 PlanApo objective and a Hammamatsu Orca Quest qCMOS detector. Exposures were captured every 5 seconds. Metaphase spindle length and width measurements were collected on spindles before the initiation of shortening.

ER enrichment at the poles and exclusion from the meiotic spindle in Figs. 1H-1K was documented by displaying GFP fluourescence intensity along a 5 pixel wide line drawn down the length of the spindle with the line tool on Image J (FIJI). The data was then normalized to have the brightest pixel equal 100 while the lowest pixel would be 0. The fluorescence intensity of the meiotic spindle was measured in a similar fashion but displaying the normalized fluorescence intensity of mKate::tubulin. The solid lines in Fig. 1H- 1K represent the mean intensity from 10 spindles and the colored shaded regions indicate the SEM from 10 spindles.

Reagents

C. elegans Strains

Strain #

Genotype

Figure

FM1010 ( F22B5.10 )

duSi29[pFM1994 ( F22B5.10 ::GFP::SSPB(nanoGLO))] II;

duSi14[pFM1953(K420::mKateGLO::iLID)]IV; ItIs44pAA173 [pie-1p-mCh::PH(PLC1delta1) + unc-119 (+)]V; wjIs76 [Cn_ unc-119 (+) pie-1p::mKate2:: tba-2 ]

Figure 1C- 1E and 1C'

FM1043

duSi14[pFM1953 (K420::mKate-GLO::iLID)IV;

ItIs44pAA173 [pie-1p-mCh::PH(PLC1delta1) + unc-119 (+)]V; wjIs76 [Cn_ unc-119 (+) pie-1p::mKate2:: tba-2 ]

Figure 1B and 1B'

FM1135 ( ZK418.5 )

duSi31[pFM1968 ( ZK418.5 ::GFP::SSPB(nanoGLO)]II; duSi14[pFM1953(K420::mKateGLO::iLID)]IV; ItIs44pAA173 [pie-1p-mCh::PH(PLC1delta1) + unc-119 (+)]V; wjIs76 [Cn_ unc-119 (+) pie-1p::mKate2:: tba-2 ]

Figure 1K

FM1221 ( F22B5.10 )

duSi29[pFM1994; F22B5.10 ::GFP(GLO)::SSPB(nanoGLO)]II; ItIs44pAA173 [pie-1p-mCh::PH(PLC1delta1) + unc-119 (+)]V; wjIs76 [Cn_ unc-119 (+) pie-1p::mKate2:: tba-2 ]

Figure 1A and 1A'

FM1267 ( ZK418.5 )

duSi31[pFM1968 ( ZK418.5 ::GFP::SSPB(nanoGLO)]II; ItIs44pAA173; [pie-1p-mCh::PH(PLC1delta1) + unc-119 (+)]V; wjIs76 [Cn_ unc-119 (+); pie-1p::mKate2:: tba-2 ]

Figure 1J

Acknowledgments

Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

Funding Statement

This work was funded by grant R35GM136241 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

References

  1. Aquino AP, Li W, Lele A, Lazureanu D, Hampton MF, Do RM, Lafrades MC, Barajas MG, Batres AA, McNally FJ. Inward transport of organelles drives outward migration of the spindle during C.&nbsp;elegans meiosis. Cell Rep. 2025 Mar 22;44(4):115458–115458. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Danlasky BM, Panzica MT, McNally KP, Vargas E, Bailey C, Li W, Gong T, Fishman ES, Jiang X, McNally FJ. Evidence for anaphase pulling forces during C. elegans meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2020 Dec 7;219(12) doi: 10.1083/jcb.202005179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fielmich LE, Schmidt R, Dickinson DJ, Goldstein B, Akhmanova A, van den Heuvel S. Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo. Elife. 2018 Aug 15;7 doi: 10.7554/eLife.38198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gong T, McNally FJ. Caenorhabditis elegans spermatocytes can segregate achiasmate homologous chromosomes apart at higher than random frequency during meiosis I. Genetics. 2023 Apr 6;223(4) doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gong T, McNally KL, Konanoor S, Peraza A, Bailey C, Redemann S, McNally FJ. Roles of Tubulin Concentration during Prometaphase and Ran-GTP during Anaphase of Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis. Life Sci Alliance. 2024 Jul 3;7(9) doi: 10.26508/lsa.202402884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guntas G, Hallett RA, Zimmerman SP, Williams T, Yumerefendi H, Bear JE, Kuhlman B. Engineering an improved light-induced dimer (iLID) for controlling the localization and activity of signaling proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 22;112(1):112–117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417910112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lu L, Ladinsky MS, Kirchhausen T. Cisternal organization of the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Jun 3;20(15):3471–3480. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e09-04-0327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nonet ML. Efficient Transgenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans Using Flp Recombinase-Mediated Cassette Exchange. . Genetics. 2020 Jun 8;215(4):903–921. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schweizer N, Pawar N, Weiss M, Maiato H. An organelle-exclusion envelope assists mitosis and underlies distinct molecular crowding in the spindle region. J Cell Biol. 2015 Aug 24;210(5):695–704. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201506107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smyth JT, Beg AM, Wu S, Putney JW Jr, Rusan NM. Phosphoregulation of STIM1 leads to exclusion of the endoplasmic reticulum from the mitotic spindle. Curr Biol. 2012 Jun 28;22(16):1487–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES