Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Biochemistry logoLink to Journal of Medical Biochemistry
. 2025 Sep 5;44(6):1297-1304. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-57574

Apoptosis in prostate carcinoma tissue: The role of caspase-3, caspase-1, and alkaline DNase activity

Apoptoza u tkivu karcinoma prostate - značaj aktivnosti kaspaze-3, kaspaze-1 i alkalne DNaze

Andrej Veljkovic 1, Jovan Hadzi-Djokic 2, Gordana Kocic 2, Xiaobo Li 3, Stefanos Roumeliotis 4, Dušan Sokolović 1, Aleksandra Klisic 5
PMCID: PMC12497462  PMID: 41054578

Abstract

Background

Prostate glandular tissue maintains a delicate balance between cellular proliferation and programmed cell death (apoptosis), ensuring the preservation of normal glandular architecture in healthy individuals. Disruption of this equilibrium - whether due to excessive proliferation or impaired apoptotic mechanisms - can contribute to the initiation and progression of prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expression and activity of caspase-3, caspase-1, and alkaline deoxyribonuclease (DNase) in prostate cancer tissue and tumour-adjacent tissue in comparison to clinically healthy prostate tissue. The aim was to determine whether alterations in these parameters could serve as early biomarkers for the transformation of surrounding tissue into a precancerous phenotype.

Methods

The concentration of caspase-3 and caspase-1, as well as the activity of alkaline DNase, were examined in prostate tissue samples, including cancerous tissue, adjacent tissue near the tumour, and surrounding healthy tissue.

Results

The results revealed a significant reduction in caspase-3 levels in cancerous tissue (p<0.05), with an even more pronounced decrease in the adjacent peritumoural tissue (p<0.05). In contrast, caspase-1 levels were markedly elevated in both cancerous tissue (p<0.00001) and the surrounding non-malignant peritumoural tissue (p<0.0005). Similarly, alkaline DNase activity (both total and specific) was significantly increased in cancerous tissue (p<0.00001), with a moderate but statistically significant elevation in the tumour-adjacent tissue (p<0.000017) compared to control tissue.

Conclusions

These findings suggest a disruption in the interplay between caspase-3 and alkaline DNase, potentially as a consequence of necrotic processes or enzyme release from inhibitory complexes. Furthermore, the increased expression of caspase-1 implies that inflammatory responses may play a role in tumourigenesis.

Keywords: prostate cancer, caspase-3, caspase-1, alkaline DNase

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PC) is the leading cause of cancer- related mortality in men, with an increasing incidence. Despite continuous advancements in clinical, biochemical, histopathological, and radiological techniques for early detection and modern therapies, incidence is still growing [1]. Due to its highly aggressive nature, rapid proliferation, high metastatic potential, and resistance to therapy, a major challenge in elucidating the mechanisms of development of the PC. The high mortality rate is primarily attributed to metastasis in bone and lymphatic tissue. The tendency for rapid progression depends on both androgendependent and androgen-independent tumour growth [2]. Prognosis is determined by histopathological findings, including the Gleason score and specific tumour markers, primarily prostate-specific antigen (PSA) [3].

Among the known risk factors contributing to prostate cancer development are advanced age (with a significantly higher incidence after the age of 50), race (with a higher prevalence in African Americans), family history, diet (i.e., a diet rich in meat and dairy products), and chronic prostate infections [4] [5] [6] [7]. From the earliest insights into prostate cancer pathogenesis to the current level of understanding regarding its development, progression, and prognosis, there has been an ongoing effort to define and establish an ideal or earlier tumour marker that could have a significant impact on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and potential treatment [1] [2] [3].

Regarding the compartmentalization of prostate cancer within the prostate gland, the peripheral zone represents a typical localization for both carcinoma and inflammatory processes. Therefore, it is not surprising that chronic infections and inflammation frequently coexist with early carcinogenesis. The inflammatory process can promote tumour progression by inducing DNA damage and inadequate DNA repair, whether mediated by viruses, bacteria, harmful dietary substances, hormones, urine reflux, or as a result of an autoimmune response [4] [5].

As a gland, the prostate undergoes continuous proliferation and tissue apoptosis, ensuring a balance between these two opposing processes in healthy males. Those processes maintain normal glandular volume. If this balance is disrupted, the potential emergence of carcinoma is a likely consequence [8].

Apoptosis is a distinct form of programmed cell death that takes place during both normal physiological processes and pathological conditions. A defining feature of apoptosis is its confinement to individual cells or small cell groups, in contrast to necrosis, which involves the death of large cell populations and is typically accompanied by inflammation.

Alongside biochemical markers of apoptosis, a highly characteristic histomorphological pattern is also evident, marked by chromatin condensation caused by DNA fragmentation, cell shrinkage, and the subsequent formation of distinct apoptotic bodies. These apoptotic bodies are subsequently phagocytosed, thereby preventing an inflammatory response.

From a biochemical perspective, the process of apoptosis is characterized by the proteolytic activity of caspases. The active site of these enzymes contains cysteine, and they specifically cleave aspartate bonds within proteins – hence their name (Cysteine-ASpartate). In a healthy cell, these enzymes exist in an inactive form as procaspases, while their activation involves the formation of a heterotetramer consisting of two large and two small subunits. The activation of the caspase cascade occurs through a series of sequential reactions. Based on protein structure and activation mechanism, caspases can be divided into initiator and executioner caspases. Initiator caspases include caspase-2, -8, -9, and -10. Executioner caspases are caspase-3, -6, and -7. Other caspases (caspase-1, -4, -5, and -12) are structurally related to caspases but primarily play a role in the process of inflammation. Among the three known types of cell death (apoptosis, necrosis, and pyroptosis), pyroptosis is triggered by the activation of caspase-1 [9] [10] [11].

Caspase-1 is present in tissues in an inactive form, and in order to become functional, it is activated through association with the inflammasome complex. Inflammasomes are cytosolic multiprotein complexes that are released in response to external signals associated with pathogenic noxae (pathogen-associated molecular patterns – PAMP) and/or damage (damage-associated molecular patterns – DAMP), induced by immune cells. Immune cells can detect these stimuli through recognition receptors [12] [13]. Caspase-1 is a well-studied inflammatory caspase that plays a crucial role in the maturation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (pro-interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18) into IL-1β and IL-18 [14].

Although the exact molecular mechanism of prostate cancer development associated with chronicinflammation is not entirely clear, it is believed that the main contributing factors are the production of inflammation-related cytokines, such as the IL-1 family, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), as well as the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The released cytokines further amplify cellular damage, which serves as a significant stimulus for carcinogenesis [15].

The process of DNA degradation in cells involves a family of enzymes known as deoxyribonucleases (DNases). Alkaline DNase is the enzyme predominantly responsible for DNA degradation, which occurs in an alkaline pH environment. This family of various endonucleases with deoxyribonuclease activity is identified, but many proteins can also acquire DNase-like properties when pH conditions change. Degradation and fragmentation of nuclear DNA are common occurrences during apoptosis. It has been established that during apoptosis, a cell undergoes epigenetic reprogramming. In the D1 phase of programmed cell death, double-stranded DNA activation occurs, leading to DNA fragmentation, which significantly alters nuclear morphology in the F phase [16]. DNA fragmentation during apoptosis is considered to have a protectivefunction, as it reduces the likelihood of transmitting mutation-carrying genes from potentially active sites to the nuclei of healthy neighbouring cells [17].

Understanding the imbalance between apoptosis and proliferation is fundamental to revealingthe process of carcinogenesis. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the expression of caspase-3, caspase-1, and alkaline DNase in prostate cancer tissue and to assess whether their expression and activity could serve as early markers of tissue alteration toward a precancerous phenotype compared to healthy tissue.

Materials and methods

The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, approved the proposed study protocol, and all the patients provided informed consent (No. 12-8818-2/18). This pilot study was conducted at the University Clinical Center Niš, where 26 patients who underwent total prostatectomy were analyzed. The diagnosis was confirmed based on clinical symptoms, findings from digital rectal examination (DRE), and elevated PSA levels beyond the agespecific reference range.

Tissue preparation

After radical prostatectomy, the next step was sampling, which involved excising sections of prostate cancer tissue, adjacent macroscopically healthy tissue, and macroscopically healthy tissue located at least 2 cm away from the tumour. This resulted in a total of 78 samples. The obtained samples were homogenized on ice, prepared as 10% homogenates, and frozen at -80°C until biochemical analyses were conducted.

Enzyme analyses

The protocols used for determining caspase-3 and caspase-1 activity were based on the enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. The tests were obtained from Elabscience (Catalog No. E-EL-H0017, USA) for caspase-3, with a detection range of 0.31–20 ng/mL, and Elabscience (Catalog No. E-EL-H0016, USA) for caspase-1, with a detection range of 78.13–5000 pg/mL.

The protocols used for DNase activity determination were optimized in the laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry and were previously published for tissue and cell culture samples [18] as well as for plasma samples [19]. The method is specific for nucleases and is based on spectrophotometric measurement of released acid-soluble nucleotides from the appropriate substrates (in this case, DNA), which are read at 260 nm after the precipitation of undegraded nucleic acids. The DNA substrate was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Germany.

Enzyme activity was expressed as total activity (IU/L homogenate) and specific activity (IU/g protein of fresh tumour tissue). Protein content in tissue homogenates was measured using the method by Popovic et al. [20].

Results

The study results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1 and Figure 2. Table 1 summarizes patient characteristics, including age, PSA levels, Gleason score, and TNM stage.

Table 1. Patient age and tumor marker values in prostate cancer.

Examined parameters Arithmetic mean ± SD
Years of age 68.05±4.55<br>(range 35–77)
tPSA (ng/mL) 17.98±10.94<br>(range 5.66–36.47)
Gleason score 6.65±0.61<br>(range 6–8)
Tumour stage (TNM) 2.34±0.48<br>(range 2–3)

Figure 1. Concentration of caspase-3 and caspase-1 in prostate cancer, surrounding tissue adjacent to the carcinoma, and distant (healthy) prostate tissue.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Alkaline DNase activity (total and specific) in prostate cancer, surrounding tissue adjacent to the carcinoma, and distant (healthy) prostate tissue.

Figure 2

Figure 1 displays the concentrations of caspase-3 and caspase-1 in the samples. Caspase-3 levels show a significant decrease in cancerous tissue. Notably, the reduction is also present in adjacenttissue, where the decline appears even more pronounced. Caspase-1 levels are significantly elevated in both the cancerous tissue and the adjacent healthy tissue near the tumour.

Figure 2 shows the total and specific activity of alkaline DNase. DNase activity is significantly elevated in cancerous tissue compared to both adjacent and healthy tissue. However, DNase activity in adjacent tissue is also increased relative to healthy tissue.

Discussion

In the conducted study, the concentration of caspase-3 and caspase-1, as well as the activity of alkaline DNase, were examined in prostate tissue samples, including cancerous tissue, adjacent tissue near the tumour, and surrounding healthy tissue. The diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer were verified through clinical symptoms, abnormal findings from digital rectal examination, elevated PSA levels, TNM staging – based on T (size of the primary tumour), N (spread to nearby lymph nodes), and M (distant metastases) – and Gleason score assessment (6 indicating low grade, 7 intermediate, and 8-10 high grade), according to histopathological findings. PSA is an example of a tissue-specific but not entirely tumour-specific antigen, widely used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. However, its specificity for cancer is not absolute, and it lacks high sensitivity in distinguishing highly aggressive cancer forms. The Gleason score is commonly used in the prognostic evaluation of prostate cancer [21] [22].

The concentration of caspase-3 was significantly lower in prostate cancer tissue when compared to distant healthy tissue, with a decrease also observed in the macroscopically healthy adjacent tissue located near the tumour (Figure 1). Considering that a hallmark of tumourigenesis is stimulated and uncontrolled tissue growth, it is logical to assume that genomic reprogramming would favour apoptosis suppression, particularly through the downregulation of executor caspases such as caspase-3. Supporting this hypothesis, evidence suggests that genomic reprogramming of the healthy cells towards apoptosis suppression leads to uncontrolled proliferation. Apoptosis involves various cellular signalling mechanisms, and in this context, malignant tissue can develop multiple strategies to evade apoptosis. This not only promotes the survival of malignant cells but also increases resistance to antineoplastic drugs, ultimately contributing to disease progression.

The cysteine protease 32 protein, known as caspase-3, has been studied in various modalities of prostate cancer [23] [24] [25]. However, literature data indicate that genomic reprogramming accompanied by gene-programmed silencing of caspase-3 has not been documented in prostate cancer to date [26] [27]. There are even conflicting reports suggesting that increased caspase-3 expression in prostate and breast cancer correlates with cancer aggressiveness [28] [29] [30]. In certain epithelial carcinomas, such as mucosal cancer, as well as in acute myeloid leukaemia, increased caspase-3 expression has also been observed [31] [32]. These findings confirm that caspases do not strictly belong to the tumour suppressor protein family. Based on clinical and experimental data, the most plausible conclusion is that the loss of caspase activity is neither a prerequisite nor a trigger for carcinogenesis. So, caspases are not tumour suppressor proteins in the strict sense. On the other hand, post-transcriptional modifications do not exclude the possibility of reduced activity and apoptotic response.

Among the potential alterations that may occur, the following hypothetical mechanisms have been proposed: 1) Alternative splicing leading to the formation of mRNA that produces a caspase protein with reduced functional activity; 2) Increased presence of caspase inhibitors; 3) Inhibition of downstream pathways leading to cell death during caspase activation; 4) Existence of alternative apoptosis pathways that regulate programmed cell death in cancer independently of caspases. Regarding alternative splicing, studies have demonstrated alternative caspase-3 isoforms in colon cancer (Caspase-3s). This protein is truncated at the C-terminal end, containing the catalytically active cysteine residue [33]. Such splicing prevents the synthesis of functionally active caspase-3, even in cases of extremely high gene expression, as observed in certain breast cancers [34]. Notably, specific inhibitors of caspase-3, known as XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein), have been identified. XIAP contains specialized BIR domains that bind to caspase-3, inhibiting its activity. Despite these inhibitory mechanisms, the presence of apoptotic cells within tumours, as well as DNA fragmentation, has been documented [35]. Unlike caspase-3 concentration, caspase-1 concentration was significantly increased in prostate cancer tissue, as well as in macroscopically healthy tissue adjacent to the tumour, compared to distant healthy tissue (Figure 1). Caspase-1, also known as ICE (interleukin-1 converting enzyme), is an initiator caspase initially identified as the enzyme responsible for generating active IL-1 from its inactive pro-interleukin-1 precursor [36]. The expression of caspase-1 is not uniformly present across different tumour cells. Studies have shown low expression levels in colorectal, ovarian, and prostate cancers [37].

Pyroptosis is characterized by membrane rupture, pore formation, and the release of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, which can further trigger a cascade of inflammatory responses involving other cytokines. During this process, DNA fragmentation, nuclear chromatin condensation, and nuclear shrinkage may also occur. Additionally, a potential mechanism of carcinogenesis consists of the inactivation of tumour suppressor genes, genomic instability, replication errors, microsatellite instability, and telomere shortening. DNA repair mechanisms, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), and DNA mismatch repair (MMR), are also impaired. These processes are further supported by increased production of free radicals, which have been detected in prostate cancer [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]. It has been shown that, in prostate tissue, caspase-1 triggers transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)-induced apoptosis. However, high expression of caspase-1 and activation of IL-1β are frequently observed in melanoma, mesothelioma, and epithelial cancers of the digestive tract, promoting carcinogenesis. Experimental data from breast cancer models also suggest that IL-1β activation is strongly associated with tumour cell progression and metastasis [43]. Given the dual role of caspase-1 in carcinogenesis, it is crucial to determine the specific cell type exhibiting high caspase-1 expression. For instance, high expression in inflammatory cells promotes carcinogenesis, whereas high expression in antigen-presenting cells suppresses it. The results obtained in this study may be explained by the coincidence of prostate cancer occurrence with inflammation in the peripheral zone of the prostate. This coexistence strongly supports the notion that inflammation often precedes cancer development. Inflammation can promote tumour growth by inducing DNA damage, usually linked to inadequate DNA repair. Conversely, inflammation can also activate immune defence cells, potentially protecting tissues from malignant cells carrying DNA damage [44] [45] [46] [47] [48].

In the conducted study, alkaline DNase activity significantly increased (nearly threefold) in prostate cancer tissue and the adjacent macroscopically healthy tissue compared to the activity in distant healthy tissue. This increase was observed in both total and specific enzymatic activity. Most immunohistochemical studies conducted in the 1970s demonstrated reduced DNase expression in cancerous tissues and premalignant lesions, including kidney, colon, and liver cancers. Based on these findings, a hypothesis emerged that alkaline DNase expression negatively correlates with cancer development [49] [50] [51]. However, the landscape of cancer biology is far more complex. It has been shown that alkaline and acid DNase activity is markedly increased in malignant tissues that, due to inadequate nutrient supply during proliferation, reach a necrotic stage. Necrosis of the tissue is one of the processes that end in cancer. Paradoxically, the reactivation of endonucleases occurs due to the abundance of necrotic foci. It is believed that the release of enzymes from complexes with inhibitors is a key phenomenon in this process [52] [53]. This has also been confirmed in the case of poly(A) deadenylase in prostate cancer [54]. Regarding enzyme activity in the serum of cancer patients, a significant increase in serum DNase activity has been observed in lung cancer, with a notable decrease following therapy.

Changes in the levels of these markers may have clinical significance in assessing the effectiveness of therapies that induce apoptosis. Reduced expression may be associated with therapy resistance and a more aggressive tumour phenotype. Increased concentration of caspase-1 contributes to the inflammatory tumour microenvironment. Its expression may influence prostate cancer progression, as well as the therapeutic response, particularly in the context of immuno-oncological approaches. Furthermore, further studies with a larger number of patients are necessary for these markers to potentially serve as prognostic indicators of disease aggressiveness and, eventually, theranostic markers.

The limitations and strengths

Our study is a pilot study. We examined the expressions of caspase-3, caspase-1, and alkaline DNase in prostate cancer patients. Studies addressing other caspase cascades and intracellular calcium levels need to support the current study’s results.

Conclusion

The concentration of caspase-3 was significantly reduced in prostate cancer, while the concentration of caspase-1 and the activity of alkaline DNase were markedly increased. Given that caspase-3 is considered an executioner caspase in the activation of DNase and DNA fragmentation, these findings suggest that their interdependence is lost, either due to the presence of necrosis or the release of enzymes from complexes with inhibitors. The data obtained regarding caspase-1 imply that the inflammatory response may play a role as a promoter of carcinogenesis.

Dodatak

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia (Project 451-03-137/2025-03/200113), and Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Nis branch (Projects O-06-17 and -28-22).

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this work.

List of abbreviations

PC, prostate cancer;<br>PAMP, pathogenassociated molecular patterns;<br>DAMP, damage-associated molecular patterns;<br>ROS, reactive oxygen species;<br>Dnases, deoxyribonucleases;<br>PSA, prostate-specific antigen;<br>XIAP, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein;<br>ICE, interleukin-1 converting enzyme.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors stated that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

  • 1.Siegel R L, Miller K D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Litwin M S, Tan H. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2532. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, Heidenreich A, Ost P, Procopio G, Tombal B, Gillessen S. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(9):1119. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Serrano N A, Anscher M S. Favorable vs Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the New Classification System and Its Impact on Treatment Recommendations. Oncology (Williston Park) 2016;30(3):229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kretschmer A, Tilki D. Biomarkers in prostate cancer - Current clinical utility and future perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;120:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cai T, Santi R, Tamanini I, Galli I C, Perletti G, Bjerklund J T E, Nesi G. Current Knowledge of the Potential Links between Inflammation and Prostate Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(15):3833. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sciarra A, Gentilucci A, Salciccia S, Pierella F, Del Bianco F, Gentile V, Silvestri I, Cattarino S. Prognostic value of inflammation in prostate cancer progression and response to therapeutic: A critical review. J Inflamm (Lond) 2016;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12950-016-0143-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hashemi M, et al . In: Prostate Cancer: Molecular Events and Therapeutic Modalities. Sethi G, Ashrafizadeh M, Ebrahimi N, editors. Springer; 2024. Prostate Cancer, Apoptosis, Autophagy and Ferroptosis: Cell Death Mechanisms and Their Cross-talk [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jäger R, Zwacka R M. The Enigmatic Roles of Caspases in Tumor Development. Cancers (Basel) 2010;2(4):1952. doi: 10.3390/cancers2041952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mirzayans R. Changing the Landscape of Solid Tumor Therapy from Apoptosis-Promoting to Apoptosis-Inhibiting Strategies. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024;46(6):5379. doi: 10.3390/cimb46060322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun G. Death and survival from executioner caspase activation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2024;156:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fu J, Schroder K, Wu H. Mechanistic insights from inflammasome structures. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24(7):518. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-00995-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kayagaki N, Warming S, Lamkanfi M, Walle L V, Louie S, Dong J, Newton K, Qu Y, Liu J, Heldens S, Zhang J, Lee W P, Roose-Girma M, Dixit V M. Non-canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase-11. Nature. 2011;479(7371):117. doi: 10.1038/nature10558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dawson R E, Jenkins B J. The Role of Inflammasome-Associated Innate Immune Receptors in Cancer. Immune Netw. 2024;24(5):e38. doi: 10.4110/in.2024.24.e38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molla M D, Akalu Y, Geto Z, Dagnew B, Ayelign B, Shibabaw T. Role of Caspase-1 in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory-Associated Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases. J Inflamm Res. 2020;13:749–764. doi: 10.2147/jir.s277457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma C, Gurkan-Cavusoglu E. A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024;10(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00397-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arends M J, Morris R G, Wyllie A H. Apoptosis: The role of the endonuclease. Am J Pathol. 1990;136:593–608. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kocić G, Pavlović R, Nikolić G, Veljković A, Panseri S, Chiesa L M, Anđelković T, Jevtović-Stoimenov T, Sokolović D, Cvetković T, Stojanović S, Kocić H, Nikolić R. Effect of commercial or depurinized milk on rat liver growth-regulatory kinases, nuclear factor-kappa B, and endonuclease in experimental hyperuricemia: Comparison with allopurinol therapy. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(7):4029. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kocić G, Bjelaković G, Šaranac L, Kocić R, Jevtović T, Sokolović D, Nikolić G, Pavlović D, Stojanović S. Altered degradation of circulating nucleic acids and oligonucleotides in diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;79(2):204. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Popović D, Kocić G, Katić V, Jović Z, Zarubica A, Janković V L, Nikolić V, Jović A, Kundalić B, Rakić V, Ulrih N P, Skrt M, Sokolović D, Dinić L. Protective effects of anthocyanins from bilberry extract in rats exposed to nephrotoxic effects of carbon tetrachloride. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;304:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Humphrey P A, Moch H, Cubilla A L, Ulbright T M, Reuter V E. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):106. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ferraro S, Bussetti M, Panteghini M. Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Managing the Gap between Clinical and Laboratory Practice. Clin Chem. 2021;67(4):602. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu M, Liu D, Liu G, Zhang M, Pan F. Caspase-Linked Programmed Cell Death in Prostate Cancer: From Apoptosis, Necroptosis, and Pyroptosis to PANoptosis. Biomolecules. 2023;13(12):1715. doi: 10.3390/biom13121715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodríguez-Berriguete G, Torrealba N, Ortega M A, Martínez-Onsurbe P, Olmedilla G, Paniagua R, Guil-Cid M, Fraile B, Royuela M. Prognostic value of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) and caspases in prostate cancer: Caspase-3 forms and XIAP predict biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1839-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Acar V, Couto Fernandez F L, Buscariolo F F, Novais A A, Matheus Pereira R A, de Campos Zuccari D A P. Immunohistochemical Evaluation of PARP and Caspase-3 as Prognostic Markers in Prostate Carcinomas. Clin Med Res. 2021;19(4):183. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2021.1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim M S, Park S W, Kim Y R, Lee J Y, Lim H W, Song S Y, Yoo N J, Lee S H. Mutational analysis of caspase genes in prostate carcinomas. APMIS. 2010;118(4):308. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Souza M R, de Souza M F, de Nóbrega M, Cilião H L, Dos Reis M B, Fuganti P E, Cólus I M D S. Polymorphic variants of the CASP3, CASP9, BCL-2 and NKX3-1 genes as candidate markers for prostate cancer susceptibility and poor prognosis. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(9):9079. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07654-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anwar S, Ambros R A, Jennings T A, Ross J S, Beza A, Mian B, Nazeer T. Expression of Cysteine Protease Protein 32 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Correlates With Tumor Grade. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(6):649. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-649-eocppi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pu X, Storr S J, Zhang Y, Rakha E A, Green A R, Ellis I O, Martin S G. Caspase-3 and caspase-8 expression in breast cancer: Caspase-3 is associated with survival. Apoptosis. 2017;22(3):357. doi: 10.1007/s10495-016-1323-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang Z, Zhang H, Li D, Zhou X, Qin Q, Zhang Q. Caspase-3-mediated GSDME induced Pyroptosis in breast cancer cells through the ROS/JNK signalling pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(17):8159. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kozłowska A, Kozera P, Majewski M, Godlewski J. Co-expression of caspase-3 or caspase-8 with galanin in the human stomach section affected by carcinoma. Apoptosis. 2018;23(9-10):484. doi: 10.1007/s10495-018-1470-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Montiel-Cervantes L A, Reyes-Maldonado E, Garcia-Chavez J, Hernandez-Caballero A, Molina-Aguilar R, Garcia-Ruiz E M A, Vela-Ojeda J. Prognostic Value of CD95, Active Caspase-3, and Bcl-2 Expression in Adult Patients with De Novo Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Arch Med Res. 2018;49(1):44. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eskandari E, Eaves C J. Paradoxical roles of caspase-3 in regulating cell survival, proliferation, and tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol. 2022;221(6):e202201159. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202201159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu X, Jiang S, Tian X, Jiang Y. Expression of cleaved caspase-3 predicts good chemotherapy response but poor survival for patients with advanced primary triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(9):4363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cong H, Xu L, Wu Y, Qu Z, Bian T, Zhang W, Xing C, Zhuang C. Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (IAP) Antagonists in Anticancer Agent Discovery: Current Status and Perspectives. J Med Chem. 2019;62(12):5750. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Afonina I S, Müller C, Martin S J, Beyaert R. Proteolytic Processing of Interleukin-1 Family Cytokines: Variations on a Common Theme. Immunity. 2015;42(6):991. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Winter R N, Kramer A, Borkowski A, Kyprianou N. Loss of caspase-1 and caspase-3 protein expression in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(3):1227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tsuchiya K. Inflammasome-associated cell death: Pyroptosis, apoptosis, and physiological implications. Microbiol Immunol. 2020;64(4):252. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lai X H, Xu Y, Chen X M, Ren Y. Macrophage cell death upon intracellular bacterial infection. Macrophage (Houst) 2015;2:e779–e779. doi: 10.14800/macrophage.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qu F, Li R, He X, Li Q, Xie S, Gong L, Ji G, Lu J, Bao G. Short telomere length in peripheral blood leukocyte predicts poor prognosis and indicates an immunosuppressive phenotype in gastric cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2015;9(3):727. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Morris L G, Chan T A. Therapeutic targeting of tumor suppressor genes. Cancer. 2015;121(9):1357. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Veljković A, Hadži-Dokić J, Sokolović D, Bašić D, Veličković-Janković L, Stojanović M, Popović D, Kocić G. Xanthine Oxidase/Dehydrogenase Activity as a Source of Oxidative Stress in Prostate Cancer Tissue. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10(9):668. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tu S, Bhagat G, Cui G, Takaishi S, Kurt-Jones E A, Rickman B, Betz K S, Penz-Oesterreicher M, Bjorkdahl O, Fox J G, Wang T C. Overexpression of Interleukin-1b Induces Gastric Inflammation and Cancer and Mobilizes Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Mice. Cancer Cell. 2008;14(5):408. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.de Nunzio C, Presicce F, Tubaro A. Inflammatory mediators in the development and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(10):613. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.de Bono J S, Guo C, Gurel B, de Marzo A M, Sfanos K S, Mani R S, Gil J, Drake C G, Alimonti A. Prostate carcinogenesis: Inflammatory storms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(8):455. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0267-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ying X, Chen J, Huang X, Huang P, Yan S. Association between polymorphisms in selected inflammatory response genes and the risk of prostate cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016:223–29. doi: 10.2147/ott.s91420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Porter C M, Shrestha E, Peiffer L B, Sfanos K S. The microbiome in prostate inflammation and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;21(3):345. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fort L, Taper H S, Brucher J M. Gastric carcinogenesis in rat induced by methylnitrosourea (MNU). morphology, and histochemistry of nucleases. Z Krebsforsch Klin Onkol Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1974;81(1):51. doi: 10.1007/bf00303600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xiao Y, Yang K, Liu P, Ma D, Lei P, Liu Q. Deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3 Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Inducing Apoptosis and Reprogramming Glucose Metabolism. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(1):82. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.57919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alekseeva L, Mironova N. Role of Cell-Free DNA and Deoxyribonucleases in Tumor Progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12246. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lauková L, Konečná B, Janovičová Ľ, Vlková B, Celec P. Deoxyribonucleases and Their Applications in Biomedicine. Biomolecules. 2020;10(7):1036. doi: 10.3390/biom10071036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Asano T. Drug Resistance in Cancer Therapy and the Role of Epigenetics. J Nippon Med Sch. 2020;87(5):244. doi: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2020_87-508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kocić G, Hadzi-Djokić J, Veljković A, Roumeliotis S, Janković-Veličković L, Šmelcerović A. Template-Independent Poly(A)-Tail Decay and RNASEL as Potential Cellular Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Development. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(9):2239. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Economidou-Karaoglou A, Opsomer M, Petit G, Lans M, Taper H S, Roberfroid M B. Characteristic variations of serum alkaline DNase activity in relation to response to therapy and tumor prognosis in human lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988;24(8):1337. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia

RESOURCES