Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Sep 6;17(9):e91730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91730

Checkpoint on Adrenal Insufficiency: Optimizing Screening in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Hima Darapu 1, Navya Konindala 2, Ravi Paluri 3,✉
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12499897  PMID: 41058822

Abstract

Background

Differentiating immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced endocrinopathies from cancer-related symptoms or other treatment toxicities is challenging. Biochemical surveillance is essential, especially in patients with new or worsening fatigue and weakness. Current professional society guidelines differ on recommendations for baseline and follow-up biochemical screening for adrenal insufficiency (AI ), and real-world adherence to these protocols remains uncertain. This study evaluates current screening practices for AI in patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy (a CTLA-4-containing regimen), quantifies the incidence of AI, and identifies gaps in early detection of these endocrinopathies.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received ipilimumab either as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab at a tertiary academic hospital between June 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Data were extracted from the Epic electronic health record and included demographics, cancer type and stage, ICI regimen, and laboratory values, including 8:00 AM cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) obtained at baseline and during follow-up. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients screened for adrenal insufficiency during therapy. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of secondary AI, screening rates for ICI-associated thyroid dysfunction, and timing and clinical setting of AI diagnosis.

Results

A total of 185 patients received ipilimumab-nivolumab during the study period. Only one patient underwent both baseline and interval ACTH and cortisol measurements. All patients had baseline TSH levels, checked prior to starting immunotherapy, and follow-up TSH levels were measured at every treatment cycle. Secondary AI was diagnosed in 17 patients (9.1%). Diagnosis occurred in six patients (35.3%) during inpatient hospitalization, three (17.6%) in the emergency department, and eight (47.1%) in the outpatient setting. The most common presenting symptom was fatigue (35.3%), followed by nausea (29.4%) and vomiting (23.5%). 

Conclusion

Adrenal insufficiency secondary to ICI-induced hypophysitis remains under-recognized in patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy, with most cases identified only after symptom onset in acute care settings. While thyroid function was consistently monitored, adrenal insufficiency screening was rarely performed. Standardized protocols that include baseline and periodic ACTH and cortisol testing are needed to enable earlier detection and intervention, potentially reducing morbidity, hospitalizations, and healthcare utilization in this high-risk population.

Keywords: adrenal insufficiency (ai), checkpoint inhibitor therapy, ctla-4 inhibitor, endocrine irae, hypophysitis immune checkpoint inhibitors (icis), immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced endocrinopathies, immune-related adverse event (irae), ipilimumab, ipilimumab-related adverse events

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple cancers and are now approved for diverse malignancies, including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma [1]. Despite their substantial therapeutic benefit, ICIs are associated with a broad range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect nearly every organ system [1]. The gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and endocrine systems are among the most frequently involved, with endocrinopathies representing particularly serious complications because they can be life-threatening if not promptly recognized and managed [1].

Hypophysitis is a well-recognized endocrine irAE, characterized by pituitary inflammation, resulting in secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI), central hypothyroidism, and sometimes hypogonadotropic hypogonadism [1]. Its incidence ranges from <1% with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to as high as 6-17% with CTLA-4 blockade, particularly in combination regimens [2]. Clinical manifestations, including fatigue, nausea, and generalized weakness, are nonspecific and frequently mistaken for cancer progression or chemotherapy-related toxicities. This overlap often delays diagnosis and treatment. Managing endocrine irAEs remains an increasing clinical challenge, and several professional societies have issued guidelines for their evaluation and management [3-7]. Nonetheless, real-world adherence to standardized screening and monitoring remains limited.

The mechanisms underlying ICI-induced endocrine irAEs are incompletely understood. ICIs are thought to disrupt immune tolerance and promote T-cell activation against self-antigens within endocrine tissues. CTLA-4 expression has been demonstrated on pituitary cells, and PD-L1 expression has been identified in the thyroid, pituitary, and pancreas, suggesting that these sites may be particularly vulnerable to T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity during ICI therapy [8]. This may account for the occurrence of hypophysitis, thyroiditis, and insulin-deficient diabetes.

Epidemiologic data highlight the burden of hypophysitis in patients on ICI therapy. A meta-analysis of 34 studies, including 6,472 patients, reported hypophysitis in 85 cases, with a 6.4% incidence among those receiving combination anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy [9]. Other large retrospective cohorts have described even higher rates, ranging from 6.7% to 13% [10,11]. These findings demonstrate the importance of improved surveillance strategies in high-risk patients. CTLA-4 blockade, either alone or in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, has been linked to dose-dependent immune toxicities, with the incidence and severity of irAEs generally increasing at higher doses [12,13]. Patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders or baseline organ dysfunction appear particularly vulnerable [14].

Given that hypophysitis is more frequently observed with CTLA-4 inhibitors than with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and occurs at even higher rates with dual combination regimens, the present study focuses on patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy, a CTLA-4-containing regimen associated with an elevated risk of hypophysitis. The objective is to evaluate current screening practices for secondary AI in this high-risk population and to identify critical gaps in early detection and management.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center and included patients treated between June 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. The study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB), and all data were handled in accordance with institutional policies on patient confidentiality.

Study population

Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) who received ipilimumab either as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab for any cancer type during the study period. Patients were excluded if they had received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or any CTLA-4 inhibitor other than ipilimumab, to ensure a homogeneous cohort and because ipilimumab is the predominant CTLA-4 inhibitor used at our institution.

Data collection

Data were retrospectively collected through a comprehensive review of patient medical records using the Epic 3 electronic health record (EHR) system. Extracted variables included demographic information (age, sex, and ethnicity), cancer type and stage, and details of the immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen, including start and end dates. Laboratory data comprised baseline measurements performed within 30 days prior to ICI initiation and follow-up measurements obtained during treatment or within 90 days of the final dose. Specifically, results for 8:00 AM serum cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were collected for analysis. Clinical outcome variables focused on secondary adrenal insufficiency and included its incidence, timing of diagnosis, clinical setting at the time of diagnosis (hospitalization, emergency department, or outpatient visit), and presenting symptoms. All data were de-identified prior to analysis to maintain patient confidentiality.

Laboratory procedures

All hormone assays were performed in the Wake Forest Clinical Chemistry Laboratory. Serum cortisol and ACTH were measured using the Roche Elecsys electrochemiluminescence immunoassay platform. The reference range for serum cortisol at 8:00 AM was 6.0-18.4 µg/dL, and for ACTH was 7.2-63 pg/mL. TSH was measured using the same platform, with a reference range of 0.45-4.5 µIU/mL.

Data analysis 

Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, and treatment regimens were presented as counts and percentages. Laboratory screening practices for adrenal and thyroid function were reported as proportions of the total study population. The incidence of adrenal insufficiency was calculated as the number of confirmed cases divided by the total cohort. Clinical presentation and diagnostic setting of adrenal insufficiency (inpatient, emergency department, or outpatient) were tabulated as frequencies and percentages. No inferential statistical testing was performed, as the study objective was to describe screening practices and the incidence of adrenal insufficiency in this cohort.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who underwent baseline and follow-up screening for adrenal insufficiency. This directly reflects our central objective of evaluating real-world adherence to recommended endocrine surveillance practices in patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy.

The secondary outcomes were selected to provide a clinical context and assess the broader implications of screening practices. These included the following: (1) the incidence of secondary AI in the study cohort, which helps quantify the clinical burden of this complication; (2) screening rates for ICI-associated thyroid dysfunction, included for comparison since thyroid monitoring is more consistently embedded in oncology protocols; and (3) the timing and clinical setting of AI diagnosis (inpatient, emergency department, or outpatient), to evaluate where missed or delayed detection of AI most commonly occurs.

Adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed according to standard guideline-based criteria, using established cortisol and ACTH cutoffs, though the present study primarily focused on screening practices rather than the diagnostic process itself.

Results

A total of 185 patients received ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy between June 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024 (Table 1). Only one patient (0.5%) underwent serial screening for adrenal insufficiency with both baseline and follow-up ACTH and morning cortisol measurements. In contrast, thyroid function was consistently monitored, with all patients undergoing baseline TSH testing prior to treatment initiation and follow-up TSH testing at every treatment cycle.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and screening practices in patients receiving ipilimumab-based therapy.

The table summarizes the baseline demographic and oncologic characteristics of the study cohort, along with endocrine screening practices prior to and during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

Abbreviations: ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone; CTLA-4 – cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; ICI – immune checkpoint inhibitor; NSCLC – non-small cell lung carcinoma; TSH – thyroid-stimulating hormone; RCC – renal cell carcinoma. 

Variable Number of Patients (n)
Total study participants 185
Age, mean ± SD (years) 63.0 ± 11.7
Gender Male: 120
Female: 65
Ethinicity Asian: 22
African American: 7
Caucasian: 149
American Indian: 2
Unknown: 5
Primary cancer diagnosis Melanoma: 69/185
RCC: 27/185
NSCLC: 53/185
Other: 36/185
CTLA-4–based ICI regimen Ipilimumab monotherapy: 0/185
Ipilimumab + nivolumab: 185/185
Baseline labs prior to starting ICI TSH: 185/185
AM cortisol: 8/185
ACTH: 4/185
Screening labs prior to each ICI TSH: 185/185
Cortisol and ACTH follow-up: 1/185

Secondary adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed in 17 patients, yielding an incidence of 9.1%. The timing and setting of diagnosis varied: six cases (35.3%) were identified during hospitalization, three (17.6%) in the emergency department, and eight (47.1%) in the outpatient setting. The most common presenting symptom was fatigue (35.3%), followed by nausea (29.4%) and vomiting (23.5%) (Table 2).

Table 2. Adrenal insufficiency screening patterns and outcomes in ipilimumab-treated patients.

The table summarizes secondary adrenal insufficiency outcomes in patients receiving ipilimumab-based therapy, including incidence, screening frequency, timing, setting of AI diagnosis, and presenting symptoms. Values are presented as counts unless otherwise specified.

Abbreviations: ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI – adrenal insufficiency; irAEs – immune-related adverse events; ICI – immune checkpoint inhibitor; ED – emergency department.

Variable Number of patients (n)
Patients diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency 17/185
Serial Cortisol/ACTH screening prior to each ICI cycle 1/185
Timing of diagnosis Inpatient: 6/17
ED: 3/17
Outpatient: 9/17
Presenting symptoms prior to AI diagnosis Fatigue: 6/17
Nausea: 5/17
Vomiting: 4/17

Discussion

Differentiating ICI-induced endocrinopathies from cancer-related symptoms or treatment-related side effects, particularly those of chemotherapy, can be challenging, especially as combination regimens become more common. This overlap in presentation can obscure suspicion of adrenal insufficiency. Biochemical surveillance is therefore critical, particularly in patients with new or worsening fatigue, weakness, or nonspecific symptoms, such as nausea or vomiting. Current recommendations vary: ESE advises a baseline 8:00 AM cortisol before starting ICI therapy, followed by testing every four to six weeks [6], while the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) recommends baseline ACTH and cortisol measurements with subsequent monitoring guided by clinical presentation [7].

Delayed diagnosis is common due to nonspecific symptoms that may be attributed to the malignancy or treatment toxicity. Such delays can result in preventable complications, including higher morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. A US claims database review found that 3.5% of ICI-treated patients experienced severe irAEs requiring hospitalization, and those patients were more likely to be rehospitalized, have higher in-hospital mortality, and be less likely to resume ICI therapy [15,16].

Our study reveals a significant gap in adrenal insufficiency screening among patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab combination regimen, reflecting gaps in endocrine monitoring in CTLA-4 containing therapies. Although all patients were appropriately screened for thyroid dysfunction, only one of 185 underwent both baseline and interval ACTH and cortisol testing. Among the 17 patients diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency, most cases were identified in acute care settings, such as the emergency department or during hospitalization, rather than during routine follow-up. More than half required inpatient care, emphasizing the clinical impact of delayed recognition. These findings call attention to the need for standardized endocrine monitoring protocols, including baseline and periodic ACTH and cortisol measurements in high-risk patients.

Practical barriers to routine adrenal screening include the difficulty of coordinating morning cortisol testing in busy oncology clinics and the challenge of interpreting results in the context of recent corticosteroid use, which can suppress endogenous cortisol. Addressing these issues may involve careful timing relative to the last steroid dose, consideration of steroid half-life, and early involvement of endocrinology when results are equivocal. In contrast, thyroid function testing is consistently performed because TSH measurement is straightforward, not time-dependent, and firmly embedded in standard oncology protocols. This difference explains why adrenal surveillance lags despite the potentially greater morbidity associated with missed adrenal insufficiency. Embedding cortisol and ACTH testing into standardized workflows similar to TSH may help reduce this disparity and promote earlier recognition of adrenal dysfunction.

This study has a few limitations. It was a single-center, retrospective analysis with a relatively small sample size, limiting generalizability. Reliance on electronic medical records and laboratory data may have introduced reporting bias and incomplete capture of external results. Because adrenal insufficiency screening was not standardized during the study period, subclinical or asymptomatic cases may have been missed, leading to an underestimation of the incidence. The focus on ipilimumab-containing regimens, while intentional to maintain a homogeneous cohort, limits applicability to PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapies, which have a lower reported incidence of hypophysitis [17].

In summary, although endocrine irAEs are increasingly recognized in the era of immunotherapy, our study demonstrates that adrenal insufficiency remains under-screened, under-diagnosed, and often identified only after significant delays in real-world oncology practice. Implementing standardized biochemical surveillance can enable earlier detection, reduce morbidity, decrease hospitalizations, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. Strong collaboration between oncology and endocrinology teams is critical to establishing effective monitoring protocols and ensuring comprehensive care for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Future research should focus on prospective studies or pragmatic clinical trials to evaluate whether implementation of standardized endocrine screening protocols improves early detection, reduces morbidity, and lowers healthcare utilization in patients receiving CTLA-4-containing regimens.

Conclusions

Adrenal insufficiency due to ICI-induced hypophysitis, particularly in the setting of ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy (CTLA-4-containing regimens), remains an under-recognized yet clinically significant complication. Our study highlights a notable gap in routine endocrine screening, with most cases identified only after the onset of significant symptoms and often requiring acute care intervention. While thyroid function was consistently monitored, surveillance for adrenal insufficiency was infrequent.

These findings highlight the importance of clinician awareness and the need to emphasize proactive screening in all patients receiving CTLA-4-based therapy, especially if on dual therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab, regardless of symptomatology. This is especially important given the difficulty in distinguishing adrenal insufficiency from the nonspecific symptoms commonly encountered in oncology patients, particularly those undergoing concurrent chemotherapy. Early identification through routine biochemical monitoring in high-risk populations may reduce morbidity, prevent unnecessary hospitalizations, and enhance overall patient care. The adoption of standardized screening protocols, supported by coordinated efforts between oncology and endocrinology teams, is essential to improving outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

Acknowledgments

Hima Darapu and Ravi Paluri contributed equally to the work and should all be considered as co-first authors.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Wake Forest School of Medicine IRB issued approval IRB00131068. Upon review of the research, the IRB finds that this study is classified as Expedited Category 5. This research meets the criteria for a waiver of consent entirely according to 45 CFR 46(d). This research meets the criteria for a waiver of HIPAA authorization according to 45 CFR 164.512. IRB approval is for a period of 12 months from 6/23/2025.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: Ravi Paluri declare(s) personal fees from Exelixis. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers, bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events. Ravi Paluri declare(s) personal fees from Ipsen. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers, bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Ravi Paluri, Navya Konindala, Hima Darapu

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Ravi Paluri, Navya Konindala, Hima Darapu

Drafting of the manuscript:  Ravi Paluri, Navya Konindala, Hima Darapu

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Ravi Paluri, Navya Konindala, Hima Darapu

Supervision:  Ravi Paluri, Hima Darapu

References

  • 1.Elshimy G, Raj R, Akturk HK, et al. Endotext. South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com, Inc.; Immune checkpoint inhibitors related endocrine adverse events. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hypophysitis: an update on the novel forms, diagnosis and management of disorders of pituitary inflammation. Gubbi S, Hannah-Shmouni F, Verbalis JG, Koch CA. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33:101371. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.101371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1714–1768. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events. Brahmer JR, Abu-Sbeih H, Ascierto PA, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:0. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Haanen JB, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J, Jordan K. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:0–42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Endocrine-related adverse conditions in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition: an ESE clinical practice guideline. Husebye ES, Castinetti F, Criseno S, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;187:0–21. doi: 10.1530/EJE-22-0689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.American Association of Clinical Endocrinology disease state clinical review: evaluation and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated endocrinopathies: a practical case-based clinical approach. Yuen KC, Samson SL, Bancos I, Gosmanov AR, Jasim S, Fecher LA, Weber JS. Endocr Pract. 2022;28:719–731. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nava Suarez CC, Anastasopoulou C. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Endocrine-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Incidence of endocrine dysfunction following the use of different immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Garrido-Castro AC, Hodi FS, Min L, Krop IE, Tolaney SM. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:173–182. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: a detailed longitudinal analysis in a large cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma. Faje AT, Sullivan R, Lawrence D, Tritos NA, Fadden R, Klibanski A, Nachtigall L. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:4078–4085. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Systemic high-dose corticosteroid treatment does not improve the outcome of ipilimumab-related hypophysitis: a retrospective cohort study. Min L, Hodi FS, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:749–755. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Toxicities associated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Wang DY, Johnson DB, Davis EJ. Cancer J. 2018;24:36–40. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clinical characteristics and treatment of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Choi J, Lee SY. Immune Netw. 2020;20:0. doi: 10.4110/in.2020.20.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Immune dysregulation in cancer patients developing immune-related adverse events. Khan S, Khan SA, Luo X, et al. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:63–68. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0155-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prediction of severe immune-related adverse events requiring hospital admission in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors: study of a population level insurance claims database from the USA. Kalinich M, Murphy W, Wongvibulsin S, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:0. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Real-world clinical and economic outcomes in selected immune-related adverse events among patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Zheng Y, Kim R, Yu T, et al. Oncologist. 2021;26:0–12. doi: 10.1002/onco.13918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hypophysitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a 10-year assessment. Di Dalmazi G, Ippolito S, Lupi I, Caturegli P. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2019;14:381–398. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2019.1701434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES