Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Sep 23;15(19):16917–16923. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c05469

Photochromic Oxime Directing Groups for Spatially Controlled Pd-Catalyzed C–H Difunctionalization with Tandem Electrophiles

Mahmoud R Saleh 1, Mahmoud Afrasi 1, Ajay H Bansode 1, Poulami Ghosh 1, Dan E Wise 1, Marvin Parasram 1,*
PMCID: PMC12501948  PMID: 41063805

Abstract

Herein, we report the employment of oxime ethers as photochromic directing groups for the controlled functionalization of spatially and inherently distinct C­(sp2)–H/C­(sp3)–H bonds. Our approach features a semi-two-pot protocol for Pd-catalyzed C­(sp2)–H oxygenation, photoisomerization, and Pd-catalyzed C­(sp3)–H arylation for the synthesis of difunctionalized oxime derivatives in a highly selective and controlled manner. Notably, we illustrate the rare utilization of hypervalent iodine reagents as tandem electrophiles for C–H difunctionalization. The reverse sequence of functionalization events can be achieved thermally, thereby providing a platform for full directing group-controlled C–H difunctionalization. Overall, this work highlights that photochromic directing groups can provide an avenue for positionally controlled C–H difunctionalization.

Keywords: C−H functionalization, oximes, photochromism, photocatalysis, palladium catalysis, hypervalent iodine


graphic file with name cs5c05469_0008.jpg


graphic file with name cs5c05469_0007.jpg


C–H bonds are ubiquitous in most organic molecules. Thus, the functionalization of C–H bonds, especially with transition-metal (TM) catalysts, has become a burgeoning area in synthetic chemistry. Numerous examples of late-stage C–H functionalization reactions have been implemented in the synthesis of a range of bioactive and natural products. Existing approaches rely on employing directing groups (DGs) for site-selective C–H functionalization. There are many classes of DG types employed for C–H functionalization based on the nature of the activated C–H bond and the synthetic utility of the transformation. DGs can either be monodentate or bidentate, possess strong or weak chelation, removable or transient, and/or templated. In most cases, DGs are flat and rigid, which restricts directionality control and enables predisposed C–H sites to undergo functionalization. For most directed C–H functionalization processes, the DG binds to the transition metal to enable proximal C–H bond activation through either direct insertion or a concerted metalation-deprotonation (CMD) mechanism (Scheme A, top). The formed metallacycle intermediate then undergoes functionalization through reaction with an electrophile (R–X), or via transmetalation with nucleophiles, resulting in the C–H functionalized product. However, this becomes increasingly difficult for the 2-fold functionalization of spatially distinct C–H bonds when different electrophiles are present with a singular DG (Scheme A, bottom). This often leads to a statistical mixture of C–H functionalized products due to a lack of DG control. While recent reports have demonstrated that C–H difunctionalization can be achieved selectively by altering the DG identity or relying on steric effects after the first C–H functionalization event, controlling the DG directionality for C–H functionalization remains an unresolved challenge.

1. Directed C–H Functionalization and Photochromism.

1

Photochromism is the ability to promote reversible structural changes of conjugated organic molecules at different wavelengths of light (Scheme B). Based on this phenomenon, we hypothesize that a DG with inherent photochromic features could engender spatial control for unsymmetrical, directed C–H difunctionalization under visible light and/or with a thermal stimulus (Scheme C). The ability to control the directionality of the DG would permit controlled, site-selective C–H functionalization of spatially distinct C–H bonds and empower multifunctionalization of organic molecules effectively. Common photochromic groups include azobenzene, stilbene derivatives, spirooxazines, and oximes. Seminal works by Shaw, Sanford, and others illustrated that oximes are effective directing groups for C–H functionalization. However, they are seldom used as photochromic groups in organic synthesis owing to the high energy required to trigger photoswitching of the oxime stereoisomers. Padwa and Albrecht reported low stereoisomeric ratios in the photostationary state, and deleterious N–O bond cleavage of the oxime was observed under UV-irradiation. , Recently, Rovis and co-workers reported that triplet sensitization with an Ir-photocatalyst under visible light could enable one-way photoisomerization of aryl oximes with up to >20:1 Z:E ratios. Inspired by these reports, we postulated that oxime ethers could be employed as a photochromic DG to facilitate two separate Pd-catalyzed C–H functionalization events of spatially different C­(sp2)–H and C­(sp3)–H bonds with readily available hypervalent iodine (HVI) reagents as tandem electrophiles to generate difunctionalized oxime derivatives (Scheme D). During the development of this project, Yoshino, Matsunaga, and co-workers reported the discrete C­(sp2)–H and C­(sp3)–H functionalization of oximes, enabled by Ir-catalysis, an Ir-photosensitizer, and sequential electrophiles. While complementary, our approach features a practical workflow with inexpensive reagents. Moreover, the C–H difunctionalization event, featuring C­(sp2)–H oxygenation and C­(sp3)–H arylation, occurs sequentially in a semi-two-pot fashion with excellent stereocontrol and chemoselectivity.

We began our optimization studies of each individual step – Pd-catalyzed C­(sp2)–H oxygenation, photoisomerization, and Pd-catalyzed C­(sp3)–H arylation, with oxime substrate ( E )-1a (Tables S1–S3). Based on the geometry of 1a, it is predisposed to functionalize the ortho C­(sp2)–H bond of the aromatic ring. It was found that exposure of ( E )-1a to modified literature conditions for Pd-catalyzed acetoxylation conditions with PIDA (3.0 equiv) in HFIP [0.2 M] was successful in generating the desired product in a 71% NMR yield. Next, the photoswitching step was achieved with thioxanthone (TX) photosensitizer in quantitative yield (Table S1), and the final C­(sp3)–H arylation step was achieved with Pd­(OAc)2, AgTFA, and a pyridone ligand (Ligand L) (Tables S2–S3). After optimization of each step, we carried out the optimization studies through a more practical semi-two-pot protocol for the C–H difunctionalization with oxime substrate ( E )-1a (Table ). After the first C­(sp2)–H acetoxylation step, the crude reaction mixture was subjected to photoisomerization with an organophotosensitizer (TX) with MeOH as cosolvent, leading to the Z-oxime intermediate (99% NMR yield) after filtration and concentration (no silica gel purification). The new conformation can now allow C­(sp3)–H functionalization to occur with the iodobenzene byproduct produced from the first functionalization event. New Pd­(OAc)2, AgTFA, and ligand L were added to the reaction flask to enable the Pd-catalyzed C­(sp3)–H arylation of the Z-oxime substrate, resulting in ( Z )-2a (74% NMR yield). To the best of our knowledge, this outcome represents the first example of PIDA serving as a tandem electrophile for C–H functionalization reactions. Attempts to recycle the Pd-catalyst after the first step, however, resulted in Pd-black formation, leading to inconsistent results (Table S4). Overall, this semi-two-pot protocol resulted in the desired difunctionalized oxime product 2a in 53% NMR yield over three transformative steps (Table , entry 1). Decreasing the PIDA equivalents led to a decrease in the yield of 2a with concomitant 2a’ from the first step (entry 3). Attempts to suppress 2a’ formation by lowering the temperature, reducing the reaction time, and increasing concentration were unsuccessful (Table S5). Employment of HFIP as solvent for all steps was unsuccessful, as the photoisomerization was inefficient (entry 4). Fortunately, we found that a mixture of HFIP/MeOH (1:1) worked well for the photoisomerization step with TX. Screening various photosensitizers for the second step resulted in a lower yield of 2a (entries 5–7). Ligand L was found to be crucial for the third step of the reaction; other common ligands for Pd-catalyzed C­(sp3)–H arylation were less efficient (entry 8 and Table S2). Control studies indicated that all the reaction components are necessary for the controlled difunctionalization of 1a (entries 9–12).

1. Optimization of the Reaction Parameters.

graphic file with name cs5c05469_0004.jpg

Entry Deviation from standard conditions 2a NMR Yield, % 2a’ NMR Yield, %
1 None 53 10
2 1.5 equiv of PIDA 21 9
3 2.0 equiv of PIDA 29 12
4 HFIP [0.10 M] 0 20
5 with [Ir] , 46 12
6 with Benzil 0 7
7 with 4CzIPN 13 17
8 L1 33 11
9 No Pd 0 0
10 No light 0 13
11 No PC 0 8
12 No AgTFA 0 <5

graphic file with name cs5c05469_0006.jpg

a

1H NMR yield using CH2Br2 as an internal standard.

b

HFIP was used as solvent for all three steps.

c

1 mol % loading.

d

427 nm was used.

After uncovering the optimized conditions for the C­(sp2)–H/C­(sp3)–H difunctionalization of oxime ethers, the scope of the transformation was interrogated (Table ). Difunctionalization of oxime derivatives possessing electron-donating groups reacted efficiently (2b-2c, 2f); however, low yields were obtained with electron-withdrawing substituents (2e and 2g) due to the low-yielding C­(sp3)–H arylation step. To transcend conventional acetoxylation and arylation of PIDA, we illustrated that replacing HFIP with MeOH for the first step of the reaction led to the C­(sp2)–H methoxylation/C­(sp3)–H arylation difunctionalization product (2h) via methanolysis of PIDA. Notably, this highlights that in situ derivatization of commercially available PIDA to other useful HVIs can potentially avoid the need for independent synthesis of these tandem reagents (vide infra). Oximes ethers possessing fused aromatic rings, 1i and 1j, underwent efficient C­(sp2)–H acetoxylation/C­(sp3)–H arylation difunctionalization, leading to 2i and 2j, respectively. Installation of the methyl group at the ortho position of the oxime ether (1k) completely shut down the reaction (2k), as the photoisomerization step failed due to the steric effects. Subjecting aryl oxime ether with branched alkyl substituents to the reaction conditions proceeded smoothly (2l-2m). Cyclic oxime 1n furnished the C­(sp2)–H acetoxylation/C­(sp3)–H arylation 2n in 44% yield. Heterocyclic oxime ether possessing a benzothiophene unit (1o) reacted modestly under our protocol, resulting in 2o in low yield, featuring preferential functionalization at the C-4 position over C-2.

2. Reaction Scope .

graphic file with name cs5c05469_0005.jpg

a

Condition A: First step = 1 (1 equiv), PhI­(OAc)2 (3 equiv), Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), HFIP [0.20 M], 40 °C; Second step = TX (10 mol %), HFIP/MeOH, 405 nm, 25 °C, 4 h; Third step = Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), L (20 mol %), AgTFA (2.0 equiv), HFIP [0.1 M], 70 °C, 24 h.

b

PhI­(OAc)2 (1.5 equiv).

c

MeOH used instead of HFIP for the first step.

d

1H NMR yield.

e

Reaction temperature = 60 °C for the first step, and reaction time = 36 h for the first step, and 48 h for the third step.

f

Third step condition = Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), AgOAc (1 equiv), tBuCO2H (1.0 equiv), HFIP (0.10 M), 90 °C, and 48 h.

g

Using ArI­(OR)2 instead of PhI­(OAc)2.

h

Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), TX (10 mol %), Ph2IOTf (2.0 equiv), dry MeOH [0.10 M], N2, 390 nm Kessil lamp, 25 °C, 24 h; then, Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), L (20 mol %), AgTFA (2.0 equiv), HFIP [0.10 M], 70 °C, 24 h.

Next, related photochromic DGs were tested under this successive C–H acetoxylation/arylation difunctionalization protocol. Oxo-oxime 1p resulted in the difunctionalized product 2p in 30% yield. Interestingly, exposure of amino acid-derived oxime ether 1q to the reaction resulted in the desired difunctionalization product 2q, with the arylation event occurring at the γ-position of the alkyl substituent (46% yield). This outcome is likely due to the bidentate coordination ability of 1q for the C–H arylation step. Oxime-acetimidate1r was examined under the reaction conditions and led to the corresponding difunctionalized product 2r in good yield. These results illustrate that analogous photochromic DGs could be employed under this paradigm.

Other HVIs and related tandem electrophiles were tested under our protocol. C­(sp2)–H pivaloxylation and O-benzoylation, followed by successive C­(sp3)–H arylation of 1s and 1t, proceed efficiently to yield 2s and 2t with phenyliodine­(III) dipivalate and -benzyloxy, respectively. Installation of trifluoroethanol via C­(sp2)–H etherification and C­(sp3)–H arylation via in situ formation of phenyliodine­(III) ditrifluoroethoxy, leading to 2u transpired effectively. Next, the aromatic ring scope of the HVIs was then investigated. HVIs possessing electron-donating groups (2w-2z) and inductive groups (2v, 2aa-2ab) were the most effective for the C­(sp2)–H oxygenation/(C­(sp3)–H arylation difunctionalization of the oxime substrates. Notably, employment of diphenyl iodonium salt resulted in the formation of diarylated oxime product 2ac (Table S6). However, difunctionalization via C­(sp2)–H alkynylation/C­(sp3)–H arylation with TIPS-ethynylbenziodoxolone (TIPS-EBX) failed under the reaction conditions (2ad).

The proposed mechanism of the transformation is shown in Scheme . Based on the E-geometry of the oxime ( E )-1, the preference of the DG allows the nitrogen lone pair of the oxime to directly activate the β-C­(sp2)–H bond via Pd-catalyzed concerted metalation deprotonation (CMD) to generate a palladacycle 3 that undergoes oxidative addition with the HVI electrophile to give Pd (IV) complex 4. Reductive elimination of the latter generates the β-C­(sp2)–H oxygenation product 5 and the aryl iodide (Ar–I) byproduct. Then, the reaction is irradiated in the presence of a thioxanthone to empower the photoisomerization of ( E )-5 to give ( Z )-6. The oxime-ether photoisomerization step via an energy transfer pathway was confirmed using UV–vis and PhotoNMR studies (Figures S1–S2). Following the addition of new Pd-catalyzed conditions, ( Z )-6 undergoes a directed CMD at the β’-C­(sp3)–H bond based on the new directionality of the DG to furnish Pd (II) complex 7. Next, the latter undergoes oxidative addition with aryl iodide, recycled from the first step, to give Pd (IV) complex 8. Subsequent reductive elimination of 8 yields the difunctionalized product ( Z )-2.

2. Proposed Mechanism.

2

Finally, the synthetic utility of the transformation was investigated (Scheme ). We aimed to reverse the C–H difunctionalization sequence with the Z-oxime isomer (Scheme A). However, photoswitching of the Z-oxime can be challenging since the system is deconjugated, resulting in a high triplet energy. Thus, the reverse C–H difunctionalization was performed under thermal conditions. Subjecting ( Z )-1p to the C­(sp3)–H arylation conditions at 70 °C and then heating to 110 °C for an additional 6 h resulted in the trans arylation product ( E )-9. Notably, the C­(sp3)–H arylation and isomerization occurred successively in a single pot. With the appropriate geometry of ( E )-9, the subsequent C­(sp2)–H acetoxylation occurred productively, leading to 10 in 44% overall yield. The formed oxime products were further derivatized (Scheme B). Beckmann-type rearrangement of 2h furnished aniline 11 in 91% yield. Photoinduced, nitroarene-promoted anaerobic cleavage of 2h to ketone 12 occurred in modest yield. Lastly, our concept was demonstrated in the synthesis of antiarrhythmic propafenone (Scheme C). Oxime condensation of 13, followed by our C–H difunctionalization strategy via C­(sp2)–H acetoxylation and C­(sp3)–H arylation, and subsequent global hydrolysis, led to 14. Next, etherification of 14 with 2-(chloromethyl)­oxirane, followed by nucleophilic ring-opening of the installed epoxide with propyl amine, furnished propafenone (15) in 7.6% yield over 7 linear steps.

3. Synthetic Utility .

3

a Conditions: (a) Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), 4–F-C6H4I (2 equiv), L (20 mol %), AgTFA (2.0 equiv), HFIP [0.1 M], 70 °C, 48 h, then 110 °C, 6 h. (b)­Pd­(OAc)2 (10 mol %), PhI­(OAc)2 (2 equiv), HFIP [0.2 M], 60 °C, 16 h. (c) DIBAL-H (4 equiv), Toluene, −10 °C, 2 h.(d) 4-Nitrophthalonitrile (3 equiv), CH3CN:H2O, 390 nm, 23 °C, 48 h. (e) O-methylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.5 equiv), sodium acetate (2 equiv), EtOH:H2O (reflux), 16 h, 85% yield of 11:1 E:Z-oxime ether. (f) Condition A, Table 1, 43% yield. (g) 37% HCl, Et2O, 23 °C, 12 h, 93% yield. (h) 2-(chloromethyl)­oxirane, NaOH, 110 °C, 18 h, 49% yield. (i) Propyl amine, CH3OH, 6 h, 50% yield.

In conclusion, we have illustrated the implementation of oxime ethers as effective photochromic DGs for spatially controlled C–H difunctionalization of distinct C–H bonds. The benefits of our protocol involve photocontrolled functionalization using simple Pd-catalyzed conditions with HVI as tandem electrophiles and the employment of an organocatalytic photosensitizer. All three transformative steps of the reaction, C­(sp2)–H functionalization, photoisomerization, and C­(sp3)–H functionalization, occur in a fully controlled manner in a semi-two-pot fashion. Also, the reverse functionalization events can be achieved under thermal control. We anticipate that this work on the merger of photochromism and directed transition metal-catalyzed C–H functionalization will provide the synthetic community with a powerful platform for the controlled multifunctionalization of organic molecules.

Supplementary Material

cs5c05469_si_002.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Farhan Chowdhury and Dr. Waseem Hussain for their helpful advice during the early stages of this work.

Glossary

ABBREVIATIONS

PC

photocatalyst

Pd

palladium

HVI

hypervalent iodine

TX

thioxanthone

PIDA

phenyliodine diacetate.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.5c05469.

  • Experimental details, optimization studies, characterization data, and NMR spectra (PDF)

The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

‡.

These authors contributed equally.

Funding was provided through the generous start-up funds from the Department of Chemistry at New York University (NYU), the Amgen Young Investigator Award (M.P.), the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award (M.P.), and the National Science Foundation Career Award (#2443095).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. a Lucas E. L., Lam N. Y. S., Zhuang Z., Chan H. S. S., Strassfeld D. A., Yu J.-Q.. Palladium-Catalyzed Enantioselective β-C­(sp3)–H Activation Reactions of Aliphatic Acids: A Retrosynthetic Surrogate for Enolate Alkylation and Conjugate Addition. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:537–550. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sambiagio C., Schönbauer D., Blieck R., Dao-Huy T., Pototschnig G., Schaaf P., Wiesinger T., Zia M. F., Wencel-Delord J., Besset T., Maes B. U. W., Schnürch M.. A Comprehensive Overview of Directing Groups Applied in Metal-Catalysed C-H Functionalisation Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:6603–6743. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00201K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Meng G., Lam N. Y. S., Lucas E. L., Saint-Denis T. G., Verma P., Chekshin N., Yu J. Q.. Achieving Site-Selectivity for C-H Activation Processes Based on Distance and Geometry: A Carpenter’s Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:10571–10591. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Wang P., Verma P., Xia G., Shi J., Qiao J. X., Tao S., Cheng P. T. W., Poss M. A., Farmer M. E., Yeung K.-S., Yu J.-Q.. Ligand-Accelerated Non-Directed C–H Functionalization of Arenes. Nature. 2017;551:489–493. doi: 10.1038/nature24632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gutekunst W. R., Baran P. S.. C–H functionalization logic in total synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:1976–1991. doi: 10.1039/C0CS00182A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Abrams D. J., Provencher P. A., Sorensen E. J.. Sorensen, E. J. Recent Applications of C–H Functionalization in Complex Natural Product Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:8925–8967. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00716K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zhang Y., Szostak M.. Synthesis of Natural Products by C–H Functionalization of Heterocycless. Chem.Eur. J. 2022;28:e202104278. doi: 10.1002/chem.202104278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Shim S. Y.. Late-Stage C–H Activation of Drug (Derivative) Molecules with Pd­(ll) Catalysis. Chem.Eur. J. 2023;29:e202302620. doi: 10.1002/chem.202302620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Sun H., Huang Y.. Recent Progress in the Development of Multitasking Directing Groups for Carbon–Hydrogen Activation Reactions. Synlett. 2015;26:2751–2762. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1560169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Murali K., Machado L. A., Carvalho R. L., Pedrosa L. F., Mukherjee R., Da Silva Júnior E. N., Maiti D.. Decoding Directing Groups and Their Pivotal Role in C–H Activation. Chem.Eur. J. 2021;27:12453–12508. doi: 10.1002/chem.202101004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Dey A., Sinha S. K., Achar T. K., Maiti D.. Accessing Remote meta- and para-C­(sp2)–H Bonds with Covalently Attached Directing Groups. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:10820–10843. doi: 10.1002/anie.201812116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Meng G., Lam N. Y. S., Lucas E. L., Saint-Denis T. G., Verma P., Chekshin N., Yu J.-Q.. Achieving Site-Selectivity for C–H Activation Processes Based on Distance and Geometry: A Carpenter’s Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:10571–10591. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Lapuh M. I., Mazeh S., Besset T.. Chiral Transient Directing Groups in Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Enantioselective C–H Bond Functionalization. ACS Catal. 2020;10:12898–12919. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Chen Z., Wang B., Zhang J., Yu W., Liu Z., Zhang Y.. Transition Metal-Catalyzed C–H Bond Functionalizations by the Use of Diverse Directing Groups. Org. Chem. Front. 2015;2:1107–1295. doi: 10.1039/C5QO00004A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Lyons T. W., Sanford M. S.. Palladium-Catalyzed Ligand-Directed C–H Functionalization Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:1147–1169. doi: 10.1021/cr900184e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Daugulis O., Roane J., Tran L. D.. Bidentate, Monoanionic Auxiliary-Directed Functionalization of Carbon–Hydrogen Bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48:1053–1064. doi: 10.1021/ar5004626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Rej S., Ano Y., Chatani N.. Bidentate Directing Groups: An Efficient Tool in C–H Bond Functionalization Chemistry for the Expedient Construction of C–C Bonds. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:1788–1887. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yang X., Shan G., Wang L., Rao Y.. Recent advances in transition metal (Pd, Ni)-catalyzed C­(sp3)H bond activation with bidentate directing groups. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:819–836. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engle K. M., Mei T.-S., Wasa M., Yu J.-Q.. Weak Coordination as a Powerful Means for Developing Broadly Useful C–H Functionalization Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012;45:788–802. doi: 10.1021/ar200185g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Parasram M., Gevorgyan V.. Silicon-Tethered Strategies for C–H Functionalization Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50:2038–2053. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Usman M., Zhang X.-W., Liu W.-B.. Silicon-Tethered Frameworks as Directing Groups for Carbon–Carbon and Carbon–Heteroatom Bond Formation. Synthesis. 2019;51:1529–1544. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1612123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Font M., Quibell J. M., Perry G. J. P., Larrosa I.. The Use of Carboxylic Acids as Traceless Directing Groups for Regioselective C–H Bond Functionalisation. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:5584–5597. doi: 10.1039/C7CC01755C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Sadeghi M.. Advances in Palladium-Catalyzed C­(sp3)–H Functionalization: The Role of Traceless Directing Groups. ACS Catal. 2024;14:15356–15373. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c04801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Gandeepan P., Ackermann L.. Transient Directing Groups for Transformative C–H Activation by Synergistic Metal Catalysis. Chem. 2018;4:199–222. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Jacob C., Maes B. U. W., Evano G.. Transient Directing Groups in Metal–Organic Cooperative Catalysis. Chem.Eur. J. 2021;27:13899–13952. doi: 10.1002/chem.202101598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Lam N. Y. S., Fan Z., Wu K., Park H. S., Shim S. Y., Strassfeld D. A., Yu J.-Q.. Empirical Guidelines for the Development of Remote Directing Templates through Quantitative and Experimental Analyses. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:2793–2803. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dey A., Sinha S. K., Achar T. K., Maiti D.. Accessing Remote meta- and para-C­(sp2)–H Bonds with Covalently Attached Directing Groups. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:10820–10843. doi: 10.1002/anie.201812116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yang G., Zhu D., Wang P., Tang R.-Y., Yu J.-Q.. Remote C–H Activation of Various N-Heterocycles Using a Single Template. Chem.Eur. J. 2018;24:3434–3438. doi: 10.1002/chem.201800105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Zhang Z., Tanaka K., Yu J.-Q.. Remote site-selective C–H activation directed by a catalytic bifunctional template. Nature. 2017;543:538–542. doi: 10.1038/nature21418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Leow D., Li G., Mei T.-S., Yu J.-Q.. Activation of Remote Meta-C–H Bonds Assisted by an End-on Template. Nature. 2012;486:518–522. doi: 10.1038/nature11158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Chu L., Shang M., Tanaka K., Chen Q., Pissarnitski N., Streckfuss E., Yu J.-Q.. Remote Meta-C–H Activation Using a Pyridine-Based Template: Achieving Site-Selectivity via the Recognition of Distance and Geometry. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015;1:394–399. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Chu L., Shang M., Tanaka K., Chen Q., Pissarnitski N., Streckfuss E., Yu J.-Q.. Correction to “Remote Meta-C–H Activation Using a Pyridine-Based Template: Achieving Site-Selectivity via the Recognition of Distance and Geometry”. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015;1:463–463. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Zhang F.-L., Hong K., Li T.-J., Park H., Yu J.-Q.. Functionalization of C­(sp3)–H bonds using a transient directing group. Science. 2016;351:252–256. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Topics in Current Chemistry: C–H Activation; Yu, J.-Q. , Shi, Z. , Eds.; Springer, Berlin, 2010, Vol. 292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Gandon V., Hoarau C.. Concerted vs Nonconcerted Metalation–Deprotonation in Orthogonal Direct C–H Arylation of Heterocycles with Halides: A Computational Study. J. Org. Chem. 2021;86:1769–1778. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Gorelsky S. I., Lapointe D., Fagnou K.. Analysis of the Concerted Metalation-Deprotonation Mechanism in Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Arylation Across a Broad Range of Aromatic Substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:10848–10849. doi: 10.1021/ja802533u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Walsh A. P., Jones W. D.. Mechanistic Insights of a Concerted Metalation–Deprotonation Reaction with [Cp*RhCl2]2 . Organometallics. 2015;34:3400–3407. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00369. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Davies D. L., Macgregor S. A., McMullin C. L.. Computational Studies of Carboxylate-Assisted C-H Activation and Functionalization at Group 8–10 Transition Metal Centers. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:8649–8709. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Xia G., Weng J., Liu L., Verma P., Li Z., Yu J. Q.. Reversing Conventional Site-Selectivity in C­(sp3)–H Bond Activation. Nat. Chem. 2019;11:571–577. doi: 10.1038/s41557-019-0245-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nadres E. T., Santos G. I. F., Shabashov D., Daugulis O.. Scope and Limitations of Auxiliary-Assisted, Palladium-Catalyzed Arylation and Alkylation of Sp2 and Sp3 C-H Bonds. J. Org. Chem. 2013;78:9689–9714. doi: 10.1021/jo4013628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Shabashov D., Daugulis O.. Auxiliary-Assisted Palladium-Catalyzed Arylation and Alkylation of Sp2 and Sp3 Carbon-Hydrogen Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:3965–3972. doi: 10.1021/ja910900p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Gulevich A. V., Melkonyan F. S., Sarkar D., Gevorgyan V.. Double-Fold C–H Oxygenation of Arenes Using PyrDipSi: a General and Efficient Traceless/Modifiable Silicon-Tethered Directing Group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:5528–5531. doi: 10.1021/ja3010545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Sarkar D., Melkonyan F. S., Gulevich A. V., Gevorgyan V.. Twofold Unsymmetrical C–H Functionalization of PyrDipSi-Substituted Arenes: A General Method for the Synthesis of Substituted meta-Halophenols. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013;52:10800–10804. doi: 10.1002/anie.201304884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Sarkar D., Gulevich A. V., Melkonyan F. S., Gevorgyan V.. Synthesis of Multisubstituted Arenes via PyrDipSi-Directed Unsymmetrical Iterative C–H Functionalizations. ACS Catal. 2015;5:6792–6801. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Sarkar D., Gevorgyan V.. Pd-Catalyzed C–H Alkylation of Arenes Using PyrDipSi, a Transformable and Removable Silicon-Tethered Directing Group. Chem.Eur. J. 2016;22:11201–11204. doi: 10.1002/chem.201602513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Kang G., Xiao L.-J., Hesp K. D., Huh C. W., Lian Y., Richardson P., Schmitt D. C., Hong K., Yu J.-Q.. Synthesis of Highly Substituted Aminotetrahydropyrans Enabled by Stereospecific Multivector C–H Functionalization. Org. Lett. 2024;26:2729–2732. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c01439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Luan R., Lin P., Li K., Du Y., Su W.. Remote-Carbonyl-Directed Sequential Heck/Isomerization/C­(sp2)–H Arylation of Alkenes for Modular Synthesis of Stereodefined Tetrasubstituted Olefins. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46051-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. a Irie, M. ; Yokoyama, Y. ; Seki, T. . New Frontiers in Photochromism; Springer: Tokyo, 2013. [Google Scholar]; b Blanco V., Leigh D. A., Marcos V.. Artificial Switchable Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:5341–5370. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00096C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Klán P., Šolomek T., Bochet C. G., Blanc A., Givens R., Rubina M., Popik V., Kostikov A., Wirz J.. Photoremovable Protecting Groups in Chemistry and Biology: Reaction Mechanisms and Efficacy. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:119–191. doi: 10.1021/cr300177k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Stoll R. S., Peters M. V., Kuhn A., Heiles S., Goddard R., Bühl M., Thiele C. M., Hecht S.. Photoswitchable Catalysts: Correlating Structure and Conformational Dynamics with Reactivity by a Combined Experimental and Computational Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:357–367. doi: 10.1021/ja807694s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Göstl R., Senf A., Hecht S.. Remote-controlling chemical reactions by light: Towards chemistry with high spatio-temporal resolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:1982–1996. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60383k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Goulet-Hanssens A., Eisenreich F., Hecht S.. Enlightening Materials with Photoswitches. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:1905966. doi: 10.1002/adma.201905966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. a Dugave C., Demange L.. Cis–Trans Isomerization of Organic Molecules and Biomolecules: Implications and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2475–2532. doi: 10.1021/cr0104375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Konrad D. B., Frank J. A., Trauner D.. Synthesis of Redshifted Azobenzene Photoswitches by Late-Stage Functionalization. Chem.Eur. J. 2016;22:4364–4368. doi: 10.1002/chem.201505061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Beharry A. A., Woolley G. A.. Azobenzene Photoswitches for Biomolecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:4422–4437. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15023e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Beharry A. A., Sadovski O., Woolley G. A.. Azobenzene Photoswitching without Ultraviolet Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:19684–19687. doi: 10.1021/ja209239m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Neveselý T., Wienhold M., Molloy J. J., Gilmour R.. Advances in the E → Z Isomerization of Alkenes Using Small Molecule Photocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2022;122:2650–2694. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Padwa A., Albrecht F.. Photoisomerization about the Carbon-Nitrogen Double Bond of an Oxime Ether. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972;94:1000–1002. doi: 10.1021/ja00758a053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Baas P., Cerfontain H.. Photochemistry of α-Oxo-Oximes. Part 1. Photoisomerization of Biacetyl Mono-Oxime Ethyl Ether. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1977;2:1351–1353. doi: 10.1039/P29770001351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. a Constable A. G., McDonald W. S., Sawkins L. C., Shaw B. L.. Attempts to Cyclopalladate Some Aliphatic Oximes, NN-dimethylhydrazones, Ketazines, and Oxime O-allyl ethers. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1980:1992–2000. doi: 10.1039/DT9800001992. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Desai L. V., Malik H. A., Sanford M. S.. Oxone as an Inexpensive, Safe, and Environmentally Benign Oxidant for C-H Bond Oxygenation. Org. Lett. 2006;8:1141–1144. doi: 10.1021/ol0530272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Desai L. V., Hull K. L., Sanford M. S.. Palladium-Catalyzed Oxygenation of Unactivated Sp3 C-H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:9542–9543. doi: 10.1021/ja046831c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Topczewski J. J., Sanford M. S.. Carbon-Hydrogen (C-H) Bond Activation at Pd­(IV): A Frontier in C-H Functionalization Catalysis. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:70–76. doi: 10.1039/C4SC02591A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Kalyani D., Deprez N. R., Desai L. V., Sanford M. S.. Oxidative C-H Activation/C-C Bond Forming Reactions: Synthetic Scope and Mechanistic Insights. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:7330–7331. doi: 10.1021/ja051402f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Gao P., Guo W., Xue J., Zhao Y., Yuan Y., Xia Y., Shi Z.. Iridium­(III)-Catalyzed Direct Arylation of C–H Bonds with Diaryliodonium Salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(38):12231–12240. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Peng J., Chen C., Xi C.. β-Arylation of oxime ethers using diaryliodonium salts through activation of inert C­(sp3)–H bonds using a palladium catalyst. Chem. Sci. 2016;7(2):1383–1387. doi: 10.1039/C5SC03903G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang X., Rovis T.. Photocatalyzed Triplet Sensitization of Oximes Using Visible Light Provides a Route to Nonclassical Beckmann Rearrangement Products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:21211–21217. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c10148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hirata Y., Kimura S., Higashida K., Yoshino T., Matsunaga S.. Site-Selective C­(sp3)–H and Switchable C­(sp3)–H/C­(sp2)–H Functionalization Enabled by Electron-Deficient Cp*CF3Ir­(III) Catalyst and Photosensitizer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202421026. doi: 10.1002/anie.202421026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. a Pan L., Wang L., Chen Q., He M.. Palladium-Catalyzed Oxime Ether Directed Regioselective C-H Alkoxylation of Arenes. Synth. Commun. 2016;46:1981–1988. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2016.1242749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Varala R., Seema V., Dubasi N.. Phenyliodine­(III)­diacetate (PIDA): Applications in Organic Synthesis. Organics. 2023;4:1–40. doi: 10.3390/org4010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Modha S. G., Greaney M. F.. Atom-Economical Transformation of Diaryliodonium Salts: Tandem C–H and N–H Arylation of Indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:1416–1419. doi: 10.1021/ja5124754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Yoshimura A., Zhdankin V. V.. Recent Progress in Synthetic Applications of Hypervalent Iodine­(III) Reagents. Chem. Rev. 2024;124:11108–11186. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Zhdankin V. V.. Organoiodine­(V) Reagents in Organic Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:1185–1197. doi: 10.1021/jo1024738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Strieth-Kalthoff F., James M. J., Teders M., Pitzer L., Glorius F.. Energy Transfer Catalysis Mediated by Visible Light: Principles, Applications, Directions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:7190–7202. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00054A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Strieth-Kalthoff F., Glorius F.. Triplet Energy Transfer Photocatalysis: Unlocking the Next Level. Chem. 2020;6:1888–1903. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Dutta S., Erchinger J. E., Strieth-Kalthoff F., Kleinmans R., Glorius F.. Energy Transfer Photocatalysis: Exciting Modes of Reactivity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024;53:1068–1089. doi: 10.1039/D3CS00190C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. a Wang P., Farmer M. E., Huo X., Jain P., Shen P.-X., Ishoey M., Bradner J. E., Wisniewski S. R., Eastgate M. D., Yu J.-Q.. Ligand-Promoted Meta-C–H Arylation of Anilines, Phenols, and Heterocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(29):9269–9276. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Fedulin A., Jacobi von Wangelin A.. 2-Pyridonates: A Versatile Ligand Platform in 3d Transition Metal Coordination Chemistry and Catalysis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2024;14:26–42. doi: 10.1039/D3CY01190A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Mandal N., Datta A.. Harnessing the Efficacy of 2-Pyridone Ligands for Pd-Catalyzed (β/γ)-C­(sp3)–H Activations. J. Org. Chem. 2020;85:13228–13238. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaur K., Srivastava S.. Beckmann Rearrangement Catalysis: A Review of Recent Advances. New J. Chem. 2020;44:18530–18572. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ02034F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. a Göttemann L. T., Wiesler S., Sarpong R.. Oxidative Cleavage of Ketoximes to Ketones using Photoexcited Nitroarenes. Chem. Sci. 2023;15:213–219. doi: 10.1039/D3SC05414D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wise D. E., Gogarnoiu E. S., Duke A. D., Paolillo J. M., Vacala T. L., Hussain W. A., Parasram M.. Photoinduced Oxygen Transfer Using Nitroarenes for the Anaerobic Cleavage of Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:15437–15442. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ruffoni A., Hampton C., Simonetti M., Leonori D.. Photoexcited Nitroarenes for the Oxidative Cleavage of Alkenes. Nature. 2022;610:81–86. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05211-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. a Somberg J. C., Tepper D., Landau S.. Propafenone: A new antiarrhythmic agent. Am. Heart J. 1988;115:1274–1279. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90021-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ecker G., Noe C. R., Fleischhacker W.. Improved Synthesis of the Enantiomers of Propafenone using Chiral Building Blocks. Monatsh. Chem. 1997;128:53–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00807638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Patil V. D., Viswanathan C. L.. Synthesis of Propafenone, an Antiarrhythmic Agent. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 1997:98–100. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cs5c05469_si_002.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Catalysis are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES