Skip to main content
Reumatologia logoLink to Reumatologia
. 2025 May 28;63(4):266–273. doi: 10.5114/reum/196745

Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in the course of systemic sclerosis successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab

Julia Kołodziejczyk 1,2,✉, Izabella Ławińska 1,2, Wiktor Schmidt 3,4, Piotr Leszczyński 3,4, Katarzyna Pawlak-Buś 3,4
PMCID: PMC12503151  PMID: 41064378

Abstract

Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is an infrequent and menacing complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). While researchers report positive impact of rituximab (RTX) on CIPO in paraneoplastic syndrome, no case reports exist for SSc-associated CIPO. The aim of this case-based review is to analyses current literature in context of particular CIPO case description.

This analysis was based on PubMed/MEDLINE database and was conducted using the selected key terms. Finally 40 studies/case reports and one case description from authors clinical experience were included into comparison and discussion.

As conclusion description of successfuly treatment with RTX and intravenous immunoglobulins can confirm the suggestions from other studies that B-cells participate in the pathogenesis of SSc, making RTX a potentially effective therapeutic option also in coexisting CIPO.

Keywords: systemic sclerosis, intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab, intestinal pseudo-obstruction

Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease characterised by inflammation and vasculopathy leading to overproduction and deposition of collagen into the skin and visceral organs [1]. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the second most affected organ system, both in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis (dSSc) and in those with localised SSc, concerning about 90% of SSc patients [2]. The oesophagus is the most commonly affected structure of the GI tract (80–90%) [3], followed by the stomach and intestines (40–88%) [4] (Table I). Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a rare, life-threatening phenomenon characterised by a recurrent intestinal obstruction without any mechanical causes [5]. Its pathophysiology is not fully understood [6], but 4 main stages of CIPO in SSc can be distinguished: vasculopathy, neural dysfunction, smooth muscle atrophy, and muscle fibrosis [7]. The main manifestations, such as abdominal pain, distension, vomiting and diarrhoea or constipation, are non-specific; hence, the troublesome diagnostic process, delayed diagnosis, and high mortality [8]. The fundamental diagnostic tools are X-ray or computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enterography presenting air-fluid levels and dilated intestinal loops with exclusion of other obstruction and pseudo-obstruction causes [9].

Table I.

Gastrointestinal manifestations in systemic sclerosis

Part of gastrointestinal tract Clinical manifestations
Oral cavity Microstomia, microcheilia
 Xerostomia
 Dental diseases
Oesophagus Dysmotility with reflux
 Oesophageal strictures with dilatation
 Barrett oesophagus
Stomach Gastroparesis
 Gastric antral vascular ectasia
 Gastric strictures
Small intestine Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth
 Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction
 Jejunal diverticulosis
 Malabsorption syndrome
Intestinal structures
 Large intestine Colonic hypomotility
 Diverticulosis
 Anal canal Rectum and sphincter dysfunction

Primary treatment of CIPO, including prokinetic drugs, oral antibiotics, and probiotics, are not effective when SSc is the underlying cause, especially late in the disease course [10–12]. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been used successfully in the treatment of severe SSc manifestations, such as skin sclerosis, lung fibrosis, myopathy, and CIPO, although the exact mechanism is not fully understood [10, 13, 14]. Intravenous immunoglobulins are thought to act in several mechanisms, such as neutralisation of pathogenic autoantibodies, modulation of lymphocyte activity, interference with antigen presentation, and interaction with Fc receptors, cytokines, and the complement system [15]. There is evidence of rituximab (RTX) alleviating CIPO symptoms in different conditions such as anti-Hu paraneoplastic syndrome, typically associated with neuroblastoma, either in paediatric or adult patients [16–19], but we have not found any case report of treating SSc-associated CIPO with RTX. Therefore, our objective is to report a relevant case regarding a patient with SSc and CIPO, successfully treated with IVIG and RTX as a salvage therapy, as well as to provide a clinical discussion on the management of the disease.

Material and methods

A comprehensive narrative review was conducted to address the following questions: “What is a CIPO?”, “What is the course of CIPO in systemic sclerosis?”, and “How can we treat patients with CIPO in the course of SSc?”. To find related literature a systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database was conducted using the terms “chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction AND systemic sclerosis” OR “gastrointestinal AND systemic sclerosis” OR “gastrointestinal AND scleroderma”, which yielded 54 results as of May 2024. To ensure comprehensive coverage of this rare condition, the only applied data restrictions were Polish or English language and relevance to the subject. Articles were allowed if they focused on CIPO in SSc (pathoaetiology, prevalence, epidemiology, clinical implications, and especially available treatment). Articles were case reports, case series, review articles, and original research papers.

We omitted several articles that mainly focused on CIPO in non-rheumatologic patients or were lacking treatment details.

Following this initial screening, the reference lists of selected key articles were examined to identify additional relevant manuscripts not captured in the initial database search. This citation searching process allowed us to include important studies that might have been missed in the original PubMed search (Fig. 1). After careful assessment based on established selection parameters 40 articles were considered eligible and included in the final review. These included 15 reviews, 9 experimental studies, 7 case-control studies, 6 case reports, 2 case series, and 1 case-based review of literature.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the article selection process.

Case description

A 42-year old male patient, admitted to Department of Internal Diseases and Metabolic Disorders, J. Strus Municipal Hospital in Poznan (Poland), was diagnosed with dSSc in June 2021, presenting skin thickening of the arms, legs, trunk, and face (modified Rodnan skin score, mRSS = 13), Raynaud’s phenomenon, multiple telangiectasias, microstomia with microcheilia, digital tip ulcers, abnormal nailfold capillaries (Fig. 2), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), and anti-Ku antibodies fulfilling 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) SSc classification criteria. Additionally, he suffered from hypertension and chronic pancreatitis. He was initially treated with methotrexate, but due to pancreatitis exacerbation and severe skin involvement, to intensify immunomodulation, cyclophosphamide was introduced. Low disease activity with skin improvement was achieved, and mycophenolate mofetil was initiated in remission consolidation. However, it was not tolerated due to abdominal pains and diarrhoea. Eventually the patient’s condition exacerbated with skin progression and multiple ulcerations on the fingertips, eyelids, scrotum and elbows; IVIG were administered. To manage Raynaud’s phenomenon firstly sildenafil was administered, but then due to poor improvement it was exchanged with tadalafil and subsequently titrated up to 20 mg per day. In September 2023 he was admitted to the A & E (Accident and Emergency) Department due to lower abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhoea, and general malaise. Laboratory findings indicated slightly elevated C-reactive protein, white blood counts, and procalcitonin levels. On physical examination painful, tender, distended abdomen and decreased bowel sounds were noticed. The small and large intestinal passage was evaluated using contrast radiography. Ultrasound and CT scan were performed. Subileus features, such as dilated intestinal loops in the middle abdomen, were discovered. Moreover, imaging tests indicated existing pneumatosis intestinalis (Fig. 3). The patient was classified for RTX treatment due to the progression of the disease and GI manifestations with weight loss. In October 2023 the drug was first administered intravenously according to the scheme: 2 doses of 1,000 mg with 2 weeks between them. The results of a small intestine biopsy indicated lymphocytic infiltration but without features of fibrosis. The patient has remained under the care of the rheumatology department. The skin condition has improved, and pre-existing ulcerations have healed completely. There have been no recurrent CIPO episodes since the RTX initiation, as of July 2024 (Fig. 4). Figure 5 presents the patient’s disease activity.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Baseline nailfold capillaroscopy of presented patient with characteristics of systemic sclerosis late pattern (reduced capillary density, avascular areas, disorganised architecture, abnormally shaped and enlarged capillary vessels, neovascularisation).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A) Frontal abdominal CT scan during pseudo-obstruction episode in July 2023 showing dilated intestines, stomach, and pneumatosis intestinalis. B) Frontal abdominal CT scan after 12 months (July 2024) of treatment showing improvement in intestinal and stomach dilatation. C) Transverse chest CT scan in July 2023 showing oesophageal dilatation and D) transverse chest CT scan in July 2024 showing its regression.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Intestinal follow-through (radiography with barium based oral contrast) showing no signs of obstruction: A) stomach and jejunum, B) ileum and colon, C) colon.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Graph showing the patient’s disease activity (measured with modified Rodnan skin score and number of digital ulcers), pseudo-obstruction episodes, and instituted treatment in 36-month follow-up.

CYC IV – intravenous cyclophosphamide, DU – number of digital ulcers, IVIG – Intravenous immunoglobulins, MMF – mycophenolate mofetil, mRSS – modified Rodnan skin score, MTX – methotrexate, RTX – rituximab, SSc – systemic sclerosis.

Discussion

Successful treatment of SSc complications is challenging and requires close collaboration between many different medical specialists. The disease is associated with various comorbidities, but almost every patient will experience GI manifestations [20]. Eight percent of manifestations are severe, including malabsorption syndrome, repeated episodes of pseudo-obstruction, and hyperalimentation [21]. There are a few possible causes of the high number of fatal outcomes in patients with GI involvement due to SSc, including recurrent aspiration pneumonia, pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis, or sepsis [10]. The most relevant condition seems to be malabsorption, which increases the 10-year mortality rate by 50% and is usually caused by the bacteria overgrowth [22]. Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction prevalence in SSc patients varies from 3.7% [23] to 5.0% [24] and is more common in females [6]. Prospective causes include infiltrative or fibrotic myopathic and/or neuropathic process [25]. Normal motor intestinal function is disturbed, which causes difficulties in the digestion process and nutrient absorption [26]. Steen et al. [21] concluded that GI changes are the main cause of death in 5–10% of SSc patients. Domsic et al. [26] claim that the 5-year mortality rate due to severe GI manifestations in SSc exceeds 50%. Mayes et al. [27] reported that the mortality due to severe GI symptoms in SSc patients is between 5% and 12% of patients.

The most significant diagnostic tool is X-ray or CT/MRI enterography presenting intestinal dilatation and air-fluid level without any anatomic lesions [28]. To complete the diagnostic process, the evaluation of GI motility, using manometry, scintigraphy, and endoscopic studies, is highly recommended [29], but it is not always possible due to the severity of the patient’s condition. Eventually, a full-thickness biopsy can be performed to rule out other possible underlying conditions, such as infections [28]. Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction can eventually be diagnosed when any other possible causes are excluded (Table II). Pneumocystis intestinalis (PI) is a rare condition defined as the presence of gas in the intestinal wall. Two types of PI could be distinguished: primary and secondary [30]. The underlying mechanism is not fully understood. The mechanical theory assumes that due to increased pressure in the intestinal lumen, which might be the result of intestinal pseudo-obstruction, the gas dissects into the intestinal wall [31]. In patients with SSc local peristaltic malfunctions can lead to CIPO, and this condition could be the origin of secondary PI [32]. In the diagnostic process a CT scan is recommended because it has higher sensitivity than other imaging techniques. Due to a proper diagnosis, some patients do not have to undergo unnecessary surgeries [31].

Table II.

Prospective causes of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction relevant in differential diagnosis

Affected organ system Potential cause of CIPO
Nervous system Stroke
Encephalitis
Neurofibromatosis type 1
Hirschsprung’s disease
Immune system Paraneoplastic syndrome (small cell lung cancer, ganglioneuroblastoma)
Scleroderma
Dermatomyositis/polymyositis
Amyloidosis
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Endocrine system Diabetes
Pheochromocytoma
Hypothyroidism
Hypoparathyroidism
Iatrogenic causes Clonidine
Antidepressant drugs
Phenothiazine
Bronchodilators (inhaled tiotropium bromide)

CIPO – chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction.

Standard CIPO treatment includes prokinetic drugs, oral antibiotics, and probiotics. The most well-known prokinetic drug in CIPO management is erythromycin, a motilin agonist that alleviates the symptoms by inducing strong phase III-like activity in the small intestine [33]. The same mechanism is indicated by another drug – octreotide, which was used successfully in SSc-associated CIPO treatment. Moreover, it reduced the bacterial overgrowth, alleviating GI symptoms [34]. Oral antibiotics are used empirically to reduce the bacterial overgrowth [35]. As mentioned before, standard CIPO treatment is usually not effective when SSc is the underlying cause, especially late in the disease course [10–12]. Recent studies indicate that B-cells play an important role in SSc pathogenesis by producing autoantibodies, activating other immune system elements, and secreting proinflammatory cytokines [36]. Hence, RTX, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the B-cell specific antigen CD20, has been administered successfully to achieve B-cell depletion and improve various SSc manifestations, including skin involvement or lung fibrosis [37]. Due to progression of the disease and GI manifestations causing severe weight loss, our patient was classified for RTX treatment as a salvage therapy. Simultaneously, IVIG in a dose of 2 mg/kg/cycle were administered, because Kazuki et al. [10] proved this strategy successful.

Systemic sclerosis is often associated with disease-specific autoantibodies, such as anti-centromere, anti-Th/To, anti-topoisomerase I, anti-RNA polymerase III, and anti-fibrillarin antibodies, which are powerful tools to stratify patients including disease severity and further prognosis. Nevertheless, < 10% of SSc patients do not present any disease-specific antibodies. Anti-Ku antibodies could be found in 2–7% of SSc patients and were strongly related to the polymyositis-systemic sclerosis (PM-SSc) overlap syndrome; however, they are not specific and can be found in many different autoimmune diseases [38]. Anti-Ku antibodies are antibodiesagainst the Ku (Ku-70/Ku-80) DNA-binding protein involved in DNA repair, regulation of the transcription process, and telomere activity, which can be found in the nucleus, in the cytoplasm, and on the cellular surface [39]. The presence of anti-Ku antibodies has been proven to be highly associated with synovitis, joint contractures, and myositis. Moreover, they were negatively associated with vascular manifestations [38].

Conclusions

Although in the general population CIPO is a rare condition, SSc promotes GI involvement in the course of this disease. The underlying causes of GI manifestations are difficult to differentiate; hence, a careful diagnostic process should be always conducted. In patients with SSc, who are unable to take standard CIPO treatment (including prokinetic drugs, oral antibiotics, and probiotics), IVIG as well as RTX should be considered, not only to increase the patient’s quality of life, but also to decrease risk of malabsorption, weight loss, and subsequent high mortality rate. Against the background of the current knowledge and collected articles, the presented case description is extraordinary not only because of its rare prevalence, but also due to carefully and distinctly selected treatment for a life-threatening condition.

Funding Statement

Funding No external funding.

Disclosures

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Volkmann ER, Andréasson K, Smith V. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 2023; 401: 304–318, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01692-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nassar M, Ghernautan V, Nso N, et al. Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: an updated review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101: e31780, DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alastal Y, Hammad TA, Renno A, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations associated with systemic sclerosis: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30: 498–503, DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marie I, Ducrotté P, Denis P, et al. Outcome of small-bowel motor impairment in systemic sclerosis – a prospective manometric 5-yr follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 150–153, DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valenzuela A, Li S, Becker L, et al. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction in patients with systemic sclerosis: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 55: 654–658, DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pamarthy R, Berumen A, Breen-Lyles M, et al. Comparing Clinical, Imaging, and Physiological Correlates of Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction: Systemic Sclerosis vs Amyloidosis and Paraneoplastic Syndrome. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2020; 11: e00206, DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vigone B, Beretta L. Abatacept to treat chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in five systemic sclerosis patients with a description of the index case. J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2019; 4: NP5–NP9, DOI: 10.1177/2397198318766819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zenzeri L, Tambucci R, Quitadamo P, Giorgio V, et al. Update on chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2020; 36: 230–237, DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang H, Cong JC, Chen CS. Ileum perforation due to delayed operation in obturator hernia: a case report and review of literatures. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 126–130, DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matsuda KM, Yoshizaki A, Kuzumi A, et al. Rapid improvement of systemic sclerosis-associated intestinal pseudo-obstruction with intravenous immunoglobulin administration. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62: 3139–3145, DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Folwaczny C, Läritz M, Meurer M, et al. Effects of various prokinetic drugs on gastrointestinal transit times in patients with progressive systemic scleroderma. Z Gastroenterol 1997; 35: 905–912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vigone B, Caronni M, Severino A, et al. Preliminary safety and efficacy profile of prucalopride in the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related intestinal involvement: results from the open label cross-over PROGASS study. Arthritis Res Ther 2017; 19: 145, DOI: 10.1186/s13075-017-1340-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang DX, Shu XM, Tian XL, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in adult patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis: a systematic literature review. Clin Rheumatol 2012; 31: 801–806, DOI: 10.1007/s10067-012-1940-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sanges S, Rivière S, Mekinian A, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulins in systemic sclerosis: data from a French nationwide cohort of 46 patients and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16: 377–384, DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Briani C, Visentin A. Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Chronic Autoimmune Demyelinating Neuropathies. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19: 874–884, DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01222-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Badari A, Farolino D, Nasser E, et al. A novel approach to paraneoplastic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20: 425–428, DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1305-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drukker CAM, Heij HA, Wijnaendts LCD, et al. Paraneoplastic gastro-intestinal anti-Hu syndrome in neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009; 52: 396–398, DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coret F, Bosca I, Fratalia L, et al. Long-lasting remission after rituximab treatment in a case of anti-Hu-associated sensory neuronopathy and gastric pseudoobstruction. J Neurooncol 2009; 93: 421–423, DOI: 10.1007/s11060-008-9787-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shams’ili S, de Beukelaar J, Gratama JW, et al. An uncontrolled trial of rituximab for antibody associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. J Neurol 2006; 253: 16–20, DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0882-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Volkmann ER, McMahan Z. Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: pathogenesis, assessment, and treatment. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2022; 34: 328–336, DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr. Severe organ involvement in systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 2437–2444, DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200011)43:11<2437::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jaovisidha K, Csuka ME, Almagro UA, Soergel KH. Severe gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: report of five cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2005; 34: 689–702, DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mecoli C, Purohit S, Sandorfi N, Derk CT. Mortality, Recurrence, and Hospital Course of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-related Acute Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction. J Rheumatol 2014; 41: 2049–2054, DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Muangchan C, Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, Baron M, et al. The 15% Rule in Scleroderma: The Frequency of Severe Organ Complications in Systemic Sclerosis. A Systematic Review. J Rheumatol 2013; 40: 1545–1556, DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.121380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sjogren RW. Gastrointestinal motility disorders in scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 1265–1282, DOI: 10.1002/art.1780370902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Domsic R, Fasanella K, Bielefeldt K. Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1163–1174, DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-0018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mayes MD, Lacey JV Jr, Beebe-Dimmer J, et al. Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 2246–2255, DOI: 10.1002/art.11073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Piao X, Ying GW, Chaney MJ. Chronic Idiopathic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction. Cureus 2021; 13: e16563, DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zenzeri L, Tambucci R, Quitadamo P, et al. Update on chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2020; 36: 1, DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mareth K, Alsaad AA, Roy A. Pneumatosis intestinalis in small bowel obstruction. BMJ Case Rep 2018; 2018: bcr2018224684, DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-224684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ho LM, Paulson EK, Thompson WM. Pneumatosis Intestinalis in the Adult: Benign to Life-Threatening Causes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1604–1613, DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Seket B, Kaczmarek D, Tiffet O. Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction and Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis in a Scleroderma Patient. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205: 180–181, DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Emmanuel AV, Shand AG, Kamm MA. Erythromycin for the treatment of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: description of six cases with a positive response. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19: 687–694, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Soudah HC, Hasler WL, Owyang C. Effect of octreotide on intestinal motility and bacterial overgrowth in scleroderma. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1461–1467, DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199111213252102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shindo K, Machida M, Koide K, et al. Deconjugation ability of bacteria isolated from the jejunal fluid of patients with progressive systemic sclerosis and its gastric pH. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 1643–1650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Numajiri H, Kuzumi A, Fukasawa T, et al. B Cell Depletion Inhibits Fibrosis via Suppression of Profibrotic Macrophage Differentiation in a Mouse Model of Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73: 2086–2095, DOI: 10.1002/art.41798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ebata S, Yoshizaki A, Fukasawa T, et al. Rituximab therapy is more effective than cyclophosphamide therapy for Japanese patients with anti-topoisomerase I-positive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. J Dermatol 2019; 46: 1006–1013, DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rozman B, Cucnik S, Sodin-Semrl S, et al. Prevalence and clinical associations of anti-Ku antibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis: a European EUSTAR-initiated multi-centre case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1282–1286, DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.073981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Abbasi S, Parmar G, Kelly RD, et al. The Ku complex: recent advances and emerging roles outside of non-homologous end-joining. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021; 78: 4589–4613, DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03801-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Reumatologia are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation

RESOURCES