Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982;323:437–447. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014083

Inputs to testosterone-sensitive stria terminalis neurones in the rat brain and the effects of castration.

K M Kendrick
PMCID: PMC1250367  PMID: 7097580

Abstract

1. The inputs to cortico-medial amygdala neurones which project directly to the area of the medial preoptic/anterior hypothalamic junction were studied electrophysiologically in urethane anaesthetized male rats. 2. In experiments with fifteen male rats it was found that none of these neurones was responsive to electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral olfactory bulb or accessory olfactory bulb or odour stimulation. 3. Experiments with four rats showed that electrical stimulation of the lateral portion of the contralateral fimbria excited 81% of these cortico-medial amygdala neurones. Their typical response to stimulation of the contralateral fimbria was a single action potential followed by an inhibitory period (20-100 ms). 4. Analysis of the polarity of evoked waves in the amygdala suggested that the fimbria input terminated in the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala and that this nucleus subsequently projected to the cortico-medial amygdala. The fimbria input was found to be contralateral in origin, crossing the mid line in the anterior fornical commissure. 5. In a further experiment 118 identified cortico-medial amygdala neurones were recorded from twelve rats (six gonadally intact and six castrated). Castration significantly decreased the percentage of these neurones responding to stimulation of the ipsilateral fimbria (20 vs. 97%) and lengthened post-excitatory inhibitory periods. 6. Results are discussed with respect to the initial finding by Kendrick & Drewett (1979) of testosterone-sensitive absolute refractory periods in cortico-medial amygdala neurones.

Full text

PDF
437

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cain D. P., Bindra D. Responses of amygdala single units to odors in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1972 Apr;35(1):98–110. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(72)90062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emery D. E., Sachs B. D. Copulatory behavior in male rats with lesions in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Physiol Behav. 1976 Nov;17(5):803–806. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(76)90044-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GREEN J. D., MACHNE X. Unit activity of rabbit hippocampus. Am J Physiol. 1955 May;181(2):219–224. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1955.181.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gary-Bobo E., Bonvallet M. Commissural projection to the amygdala thourgh the fimbria fornix system in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1977 Jan 18;27(1):61–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00234825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris V. S., Sachs B. D. Copulatory behavior in male rats following amygdaloid lesions. Brain Res. 1975 Mar 28;86(3):514–518. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90906-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kendrick K. M., Drewett R. F. Testosterone reduces refractory period of stria terminalis neurons in the rat brain. Science. 1979 May 25;204(4395):877–879. doi: 10.1126/science.220709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kendrick K. M., Drewett R. F., Wilson C. A. Effect of testosterone on neuronal refractory periods, sexual behaviour and luteinizing hormone: a comparison of time-courses. J Endocrinol. 1981 Apr;89(1):147–155. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0890147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malsbury C. W. Facilitation of male rat copulatory behavior by electrical stimulation of the medial preoptic area. Physiol Behav. 1971 Dec;7(6):797–805. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(71)90042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murphy M. R., Schneider G. E. Olfactory bulb removal eliminates mating behavior in the male golden hamster. Science. 1970 Jan 16;167(3916):302–304. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3916.302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ottersen O. P., Ben-Ari Y. Afferent connections to the amygdaloid complex of the rat and cat. I. Projections from the thalamus. J Comp Neurol. 1979 Sep 15;187(2):401–424. doi: 10.1002/cne.901870209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Raisman G., Cowan W. M., Powell T. P. An experimental analysis of the efferent projection of the hippocampus. Brain. 1966 Mar;89(1):83–108. doi: 10.1093/brain/89.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Scalia F., Winans S. S. The differential projections of the olfactory bulb and accessory olfactory bulb in mammals. J Comp Neurol. 1975 May 1;161(1):31–55. doi: 10.1002/cne.901610105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scott J. W., Pfaffmann C. Characteristics of responses of lateral hypothalamic neurons to stimulation of the olfactory system. Brain Res. 1972 Dec 24;48:251–264. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Segal M. Convergence of sensory input on units in the hippocampal system of the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Jul;87(1):91–99. doi: 10.1037/h0036581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Teyler T. J., Vardaris R. M., Lewis D., Rawitch A. B. Gonadal steroids: effects on excitability of hippocampal pyramidal cells. Science. 1980 Aug 29;209(4460):1017–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.7190730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Dis H., Larsson K. Induction of sexual arousal in the castrated male rat by intracranial stimulation. Physiol Behav. 1971 Jan;6(1):85–86. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(71)90021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES