Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982;323:463–472. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014085

Remote pattern reversal reduces the proximal negative response of the goldfish retina.

B T Olsen, T Seim, A Valberg
PMCID: PMC1250369  PMID: 7097582

Abstract

1. Using the eyecup preparation, proximal negative responses (PNR) to small test spots of different irradiance were recorded with (a) a stationary peripheral black and white grating surrounding the test spot, and (b) with contrast reversal of the same grating. In the latter case, the PNR-amplitude was reduced by a magnitude that was dependent on the frequency of contrast reversal. The reduction was maximum (approximately 50%) for a frequency of 8-10 Hz. 2. The attenuation was constant for PNR-amplitudes greater than half the maximum value, but increased for smaller responses. The fact that the intensity-response curve was not merely shifted towards higher values on the log intensity axis, indicates that the suppression was an effect neither of stray light nor of adaptive processes in the distal retina. 3. The effect of a single shift of the grating (by half a cycle) on the PNR was studied at different delays between grating shift and test spot presentation. Strong suppression of the PNR was found for delays between 100 ms (shift preceding test spot) and -50 ms (test spot preceding grating shift), with a maximum at about 30 ms. 4. This long-range effect of peripheral transient stimulation is of inhibitory nature, and probably related to Werblin's windmill effect.

Full text

PDF
463

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breitmeyer B. G., Valberg A. Local foveal inhibitory effects of global peripheral excitation. Science. 1979 Feb 2;203(4379):463–464. doi: 10.1126/science.760201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breitmeyer B., Valberg A., Kurtenbach W., Neumeyer C. The lateral effect of oscillation of peripheral luminance gratings on the foveal increment threshold. Vision Res. 1980;20(9):799–805. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks B., Holden A. L. Suppression of visual signals by rapid image displacement in the pigeon retina: a possible mechanism for "saccadic" suppression. Vision Res. 1973 Jul;13(7):1387–1390. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90216-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burkhardt D. A., Berntson G. G. Light adaptation and excitation: lateral spread of signals within the frog retina. Vision Res. 1972 Jun;12(6):1095–1111. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90100-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burkhardt D. A., Mooney R. Electrical responses in the inner retina of teleosts and reptiles. Vision Res. 1977;17(1):154–156. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90215-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burkhardt D. A. Proximal negative response of frog retina. J Neurophysiol. 1970 May;33(3):405–420. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.3.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burkhardt D. A. Sensitization and centre-surround antagonism in Necturus retina. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;236(3):593–610. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Donner K. O., Reuter T. The dark-adaptation of single units in the frog's retina and its relation to the regeneration of rhodopsin. Vision Res. 1965 Dec;5(11):615–632. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer B., Krüger J. Continuous movement of remote patterns and shift-effect of cat retinal ganglion cells. Exp Brain Res. 1980;40(2):229–232. doi: 10.1007/BF00237541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaneko A. Receptive field organization of bipolar and amacrine cells in the goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;235(1):133–153. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krüger J., Fischer B. Strong periphery effect in cat retinal ganglion cells. Excitatory responses in ON- and OFF- center neurones to single grid displacements. Exp Brain Res. 1973 Oct 26;18(3):316–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00234601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levine M. W., Shefner J. M. X-like and not X-like cells in goldfish retina. Vision Res. 1979;19(1):95–97. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MCILWAIN J. T. RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF OPTIC TRACT AXONS AND LATERAL GENICULATE CELLS: PERIPHERAL EXTENT AND BARBITURATE SENSITIVITY. J Neurophysiol. 1964 Nov;27:1154–1173. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.6.1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McIlwain J. T. Some evidence concerning the physiological basis of the periphery effect in the cat's retina. Exp Brain Res. 1966;1(3):265–271. doi: 10.1007/BF00234346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Naka K. I., Rushton W. A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):536–555. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thibos L. N., Werblin F. S. The properties of surround antagonism elicited by spinning windmill patterns in the mudpuppy retina. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:101–116. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Valberg A., Breitmeyer B. The lateral effect of oscillation of peripheral luminance gratings: test of various hypotheses. Vision Res. 1980;20(9):789–798. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Werblin F. S., Copenhagen D. R. Control of retinal sensitivity. 3. Lateral interactions at the inner plexiform layer. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Jan;63(1):88–110. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.1.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wunk D. F., Werblin F. S. Synaptic inputs to the ganglion cells in the tiger salamander retina. J Gen Physiol. 1979 Mar;73(3):265–286. doi: 10.1085/jgp.73.3.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES