Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982;324:135–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014104

Effects of cholinergic drugs on receptive field properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells

M Ariel 1,*, N W Daw 1
PMCID: PMC1250697  PMID: 7097593

Abstract

1. Retinal ganglion cells were recorded extracellularly from the rabbit's eye in situ to study the effects of cholinergic drugs on receptive field properties. Physostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, and nicotine increased the spontaneous activity of nearly all retinal ganglion cell types. The effectiveness of physostigmine was roughly correlated with the neurone's inherent level of spontaneous activity. Brisk cells, having high rates of spontaneous firing, showed large increases in their maintained discharge, whereas sluggish cells, with few or no spontaneous spikes, showed small and sometimes transient increases in spontaneous activity during physostigmine.

2. The sensitivity of ganglion cells to spots of optimal size and position did not change substantially during the infusion of physostigmine. However, the responsiveness to light (number of spikes per stimulus above the spontaneous level) increased. This effect occurred with sluggish and more complex cells, rarely with brisk cells.

3. Another effect of physostigmine on sluggish and more complex cells was to make these cells `on—off'. The additional response to the inappropriate change in contrast had a long latency and lacked an initial transient burst.

4. Complex receptive field properties such as orientation sensitivity, radial grating inhibition, speed tuning and size specificity were also examined. These inhibitory properties were still present during infusion of physostigmine and, in most cases, the trigger feature of each cell type remained.

5. These results are consistent with pharmacological results on ACh release from the retina. There appear to be two types of release of ACh, having their most powerful influences on separate classes of cells. One release (transient), occurs at light onset and offset and acts primarily on sluggish and more complex ganglion cells; the other release (tonic) is not light-modulated and acts primarily on brisk cells. A wiring diagram for the ACh cells is suggested.

Full text

PDF
135

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames A., 3rd, Pollen D. A. Neurotransmission in central nervous tissue: a study of isolated rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):424–442. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel M., Daw N. W. Pharmacological analysis of directionally sensitive rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1982 Mar;324:161–185. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BARLOW H. B., HILL R. M., LEVICK W. R. RETINAL GANGLION CELLS RESPONDING SELECTIVELY TO DIRECTION AND SPEED OF IMAGE MOTION IN THE RABBIT. J Physiol. 1964 Oct;173:377–407. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow H. B., Levick W. R. Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(3):699–718. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boycott B. B., Wässle H. The morphological types of ganglion cells of the domestic cat's retina. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):397–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caldwell J. H., Daw N. W. Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on rabbit retinal ganglion cells: changes in centre surround receptive fields. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:299–310. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caldwell J. H., Daw N. W. New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:257–276. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caldwell J. H., Daw N. W., Wyatt H. J. Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on rabbit retinal ganglion cells: lateral interactions for cells with more complex receptive fields. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:277–298. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R. Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):421–456. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R. Properties of rarely encountered types of ganglion cells in the cat's retina and an overall classification. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):457–492. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dacheux R. F., Miller R. F. An intracellular electrophysiological study of the ontogeny of functional synapses in the rabbit retina. I. Receptors, horizontal, and bipolar cells. J Comp Neurol. 1981 May 10;198(2):307–326. doi: 10.1002/cne.901980209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellias S. A., Stevens J. K. The dendritic varicosity: a mechanism for electrically isolating the dendrites of cat retinal amacrine cells? Brain Res. 1980 Sep 8;196(2):365–372. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90401-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Famiglietti E. V., Jr, Kolb H. Structural basis for ON-and OFF-center responses in retinal ganglion cells. Science. 1976 Oct 8;194(4261):193–195. doi: 10.1126/science.959847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayden S. A., Mills J. W., Masland R. M. Acetylcholine synthesis by displaced amacrine cells. Science. 1980 Oct;210(4468):435–437. doi: 10.1126/science.7433984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirby A. W., Enroth-Cugell C. The involvement of gamma-aminobutyric acid in the organization of cat retinal ganglion cell receptive fields. A study with picrotoxin and bicuculline. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Oct;68(4):465–484. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.4.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lam D. M., Lasater E. M., Naka K. I. gamma-Aminobutyric acid: a neurotransmitter candidate for cone horizontal cells of the catfish retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Dec;75(12):6310–6313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.12.6310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levick W. R., Cleland B. G. Selectivity of microelectrodes in recordings from cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Nov;37(6):1387–1393. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.6.1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levick W. R. Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbits retina. J Physiol. 1967 Feb;188(3):285–307. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Masland R. H., Ames A., 3rd Responses to acetylcholine of ganglion cells in an isolated mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Nov;39(6):1220–1235. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Masland R. H., Livingstone C. J. Effect of stimulation with light on synthesis and release of acetylcholine by an isolated mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Nov;39(6):1210–1219. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Masland R. H., Mills J. W. Autoradiographic identification of acetylcholine in the rabbit retina. J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;83(1):159–178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Massey S. C., Neal M. J. The light evoked release of acetylcholine from the rabbit retina iN vivo and its inhibition by gamma-aminobutyric acid. J Neurochem. 1979 Apr;32(4):1327–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1979.tb11062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller R. F., Dacheux R. F. Synaptic organization and ionic basis of on and off channels in mudpuppy retina. III. A model of ganglion cell receptive field organization based on chloride-free experiments. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Jun;67(6):679–690. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.6.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Naka K. Functional organization of catfish retina. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Jan;40(1):26–43. doi: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nelson R., Famiglietti E. V., Jr, Kolb H. Intracellular staining reveals different levels of stratification for on- and off-center ganglion cells in cat retina. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Mar;41(2):472–483. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.2.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nichols C. W., Koelle G. B. Comparison of the localization of acetylcholinesterase and non-specific cholinesterase activities in mammalian and avian retinas. J Comp Neurol. 1968 May;133(1):1–16. doi: 10.1002/cne.901330102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oyster C. W., Simpson J. I., Takahashi E. S., Soodak R. E. Retinal ganglion cells projecting to the rabbit accessory optic system. J Comp Neurol. 1980 Mar 1;190(1):49–61. doi: 10.1002/cne.901900105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pourcho R. G. Localization of cholinergic synapses in mammalian retina with peroxidase-conjugated alpha-bungarotoxin. Vision Res. 1979;19(3):287–292. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ross C. D., McDougal D. B., Jr The distribution of choline acetyltransferase activity in vertebrate retina. J Neurochem. 1976 Mar;26(3):521–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1976.tb01505.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stone J., Fukuda Y. Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Jul;37(4):722–748. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.4.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stone J., Hoffmann K. P. Very slow-conducting ganglion cells in the cat's retina: a major, new functional type? Brain Res. 1972 Aug 25;43(2):610–616. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90416-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stone J. Sampling properties of microelectrodes assessed in the cat's retina. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Nov;36(6):1071–1079. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.6.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Straschill M., Perwein J. The effect of iontophoretically applied acetylcholine upon the cat's retinal ganglion cells. Pflugers Arch. 1973;339(4):289–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaney D. I., Peichi L., Boycott B. B. Matching populations of amacrine cells in the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers of the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol. 1981 Jul 1;199(3):373–391. doi: 10.1002/cne.901990305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vogel Z., Nirenberg M. Localization of acetylcholine receptors during synaptogenesis in retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1806–1810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES