Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1985 Jun;201(6):695–704. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198506000-00005

Appendicitis in mature patients.

R P Burns, J L Cochran, W L Russell, R M Bard
PMCID: PMC1250797  PMID: 4004382

Abstract

All patients greater than 50 years of age (N = 96) admitted with a pre- or postoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis from 1971 to 1980 were reviewed. A comparative series of 91 patients aged 25 to 50 years was similarly reviewed. Noninflammatory diseases of the appendix and incidental appendectomies were excluded. Detailed study of symptoms, clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, radiographic evaluation, concomitant diseases, hospital course, surgical findings, complications, and mortality were completed. Comparison of patients aged 25 to 50 to patients older than 50 years revealed a statistically significant increased incidence of perforation in the older group (p less than 0.0001). Sixty-five per cent of the older group showed greater incidence of perforation. Further analysis of this series yields the hypothesis that the increased incidence of perforation is related to a significant decrease in the frequency of classic presentation in the greater-than-50 age group, a significant decrease in frequency of correct admission diagnosis and a significant delay between admission and surgical procedure in the older group. A more rapid pathophysiologic progression of appendicitis with increasing age was noted. A much higher percentage of older patients was undiagnosed until the surgical procedure. In this group, there was a longer duration of symptoms, less frequent classic presentation, and decreased frequency of right lower quadrant guarding and tenderness as compared to patients with correct diagnosis prior to surgery. Complications were much more frequent in older patients and higher still in those with perforation. Analysis of findings by decade of life revealed an anticipated high incidence of perforated appendicitis in patients greater than 50, but also showed a continuation of the high incidence of perforation into the decade 40 to 50. There were three deaths in the entire study group (1.6%) all occurring in the older age group with postoperative sepsis.

Full text

PDF
695

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berry J., Jr, Malt R. A. Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg. 1984 Nov;200(5):567–575. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198411000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchman T. G., Zuidema G. D. Reasons for delay of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984 Mar;158(3):260–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coller F. A., Valk W. L. THE DELAYED CLOSURE OF CONTAMINATED WOUNDS: A PRELIMINARY REPORT. Ann Surg. 1940 Aug;112(2):256–270. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194008000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooperman M. Complications of appendectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1983 Dec;63(6):1233–1247. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43185-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham F. G., McCubbin J. H. Appendicitis complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Apr;45(4):415–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards F. H., Davies R. S. Use of a Bayesian algorithm in the computer-assisted diagnosis of appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984 Mar;158(3):219–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Freund H. R., Rubinstein E. Appendicitis in the aged. Is it really different? Am Surg. 1984 Oct;50(10):573–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GOLDENBERG I. S. Acute appendicitis in the aged. Geriatrics. 1955 Jul;10(7):324–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haller J. A., Jr, Shaker I. J., Donahoo J. S., Schnaufer L., White J. J. Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 1973 May;177(5):595–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jona J. Z., Belin R. P., Selke A. C. Barium enema as a diagnostic aid in children with abdominal pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977 Mar;144(3):351–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koepsell T. D., Inui T. S., Farewell V. T. Factors affecting perforation in acute appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Oct;153(4):508–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lau W. Y., Teoh-Chan C. H., Fan S. T., Yam W. C., Lau K. F., Wong S. H. The bacteriology and septic complication of patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg. 1984 Nov;200(5):576–581. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198411000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis F. R., Holcroft J. W., Boey J., Dunphy E. Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):677–684. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110223039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mittelpunkt A., Nora P. F. Current features in the treatment of acute appendicitis: an analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases. Surgery. 1966 Nov;60(5):971–975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Owens B. J., Hamit H. F. Appendicitis in the elderly. Ann Surg. 1978 Apr;187(4):392–396. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197804000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peltokallio P., Jauhiainen K. Acute appendicitis in the aged patient. Study of 300 cases after the age of 60. Arch Surg. 1970 Feb;100(2):140–143. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340200028006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rajagopalan A. E., Mason J. H., Kennedy M., Pawlikowski J. The value of the barium enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1977 Apr;112(4):531–533. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370040183029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scher K. S., Coil J. A. The continuing challenge of perforating appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Apr;150(4):535–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schisgall R. M. Use of the barium swallow in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 1983 Nov;146(5):663–667. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schwartz M. Z., Tapper D., Solenberger R. I. Management of perforated appendicitis in children. The controversy continues. Ann Surg. 1983 Apr;197(4):407–411. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198304000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Silberman V. A. Appendectomy in a large metropolitan hospital. Retrospective analysis of 1,013 cases. Am J Surg. 1981 Nov;142(5):615–618. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90437-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Søreide O. Appendicitis--a study of incidence, death rates and consumption of hospital resources. Postgrad Med J. 1984 May;60(703):341–345. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.60.703.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thorbjarnarson B., Loehr W. J. Acute appendicitis in patients over the age of sixty. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 Dec;125(6):1277–1280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Way C. W., 3rd, Murphy J. R., Dunn E. L., Elerding S. C. A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Nov;155(5):685–688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams G. R. Presidential Address: a history of appendicitis. With anecdotes illustrating its importance. Ann Surg. 1983 May;197(5):495–506. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198305000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Winslow R. E., Dean R. E., Harley J. W. Acute nonperforating appendicitis. Efficacy of brief antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Surg. 1983 May;118(5):651–655. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390050117023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yusuf M. F., Dunn E. Appendicitis in the elderly: learn to discern the untypical picture. Geriatrics. 1979 Sep;34(9):73–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES