Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Jul 15;62(11):14121–14139. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-05191-y

Fermented Soybean Pulp Alleviates Disease Progression of 5×FAD Model Mice

Chun-Yen Yang 1, Yu-Hsuan Liu 1, Ta-Chun Lin 1, Kuo-Hsuan Chang 2, Hsiu Mei Hsieh-Li 1,
PMCID: PMC12511221  PMID: 40663268

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system, characterized by memory loss and cognitive decline. The two main hypotheses regarding AD involve the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) forming plaques and the intracellular hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, leading to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT). These processes are accompanied by neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, and eventual neuronal death. While soy foods are widely recognized for their nutritional benefits, soybean pulp (okara), the residue left over from making tofu or soybean milk, is mostly discarded as kitchen waste, despite being rich in nutrients such as dietary fiber, protein, and isoflavones. This underutilized byproduct may serve as a valuable resource for functional food development and sustainable resource use. In this study, fermented soybean pulp (FS) demonstrated neuroprotective effects. In vitro, FS at concentrations of 0.001 µg/mL and 0.01 µg/mL significantly improved cell viability in Aβ-induced HT-22 cells and reduced lipid peroxidation. Further, in vivo oral administration of FS attenuated the cognitive deficits of 5 × FAD mice, enhancing both short and long-term memory and reducing anxiety-like behaviors. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the FS-treated 5 × FAD mice group significantly reduced hippocampal amyloid plaque accumulation and gliosis. FS also upregulated the expression levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), PSD95, and synaptophysin, while preventing hippocampal neuronal loss. Mechanistically, FS may activate the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway and NF-κB-mediated inflammation through the modulation of the Akt/GSK3β signaling axis in the hippocampus. These molecular actions likely contribute to increased antioxidant enzymes and suppressed neuroinflammatory responses. Overall, this study suggests that FS has therapeutic potential for alleviating cognitive and behavioral impairments in AD. Moreover, the repurposing of soybean pulp, which would otherwise be discarded, enhances its utilization value and supports sustainable green recycling.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12035-025-05191-y.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, 5 × FAD, Cognition, Fermented soybean pulp, AKT/GSK3β/NRF2, BDNF

Introduction

According to statistics from the World Health Organization, over 50 million people worldwide are affected by dementia. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form, accounting for approximately 60–80% of all cases [1]. Early symptoms of AD include anxiety and apathy, progressing to memory loss and the inability to manage daily living activities [2]. Although the exact etiology of AD remains complex and multifactorial, two widely accepted pathological hypotheses involve the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein [3, 4]. Additionally, increasing evidence has demonstrated that impaired antioxidant defense and neuroinflammation play a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of AD [5, 6]. Both Aβ plaque and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are known to trigger chronic neuroinflammatory responses and impair antioxidant defense systems, exacerbating neurotoxicity. These pathological processes ultimately result in acetylcholine depletion, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal death [7].

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) is a key transcription factor that regulates inflammatory and oxidative stress [8]. NRF2 activates a variety of downstream antioxidant enzymes, including heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), which are essential for mitigating oxidative damage [9]. NRF2 also plays a crucial role in maintaining neuronal survival and promoting neuroplasticity [10, 11]. It has been observed in AD patients that a significant reduction in nuclear NRF2 expression in the CA1 region of the hippocampus [12] leads to decreased expression of genes of antioxidant enzymes and renders neurons more vulnerable to oxidative stress-induced damage [13]. Moreover, NRF2 deficiency has been shown to exacerbate cognitive impairments in AD mouse models [14, 15]. A key upstream regulator of NRF2 is the AKT/GSK3β signaling pathway [16]. Activated GSK3β inhibits NRF2 by preventing its nuclear translocation, promoting its ubiquitination, and targeting it for proteasomal degradation [17, 18]. Conversely, activation of the AKT signaling pathway leads to phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK3β, thereby preventing its inhibitory effect on NRF2 [19]. Various compounds have been reported to influence the AKT/GSK3β signaling, leading to NRF2 activation and mitigation of AD-related symptoms [2022]. It suggests that the AKT/GSK3β/NRF2 pathway may offer a promising therapeutic strategy for AD treatment.

Fermentation has been used to enhance the bioavailability of minerals, vitamins, and isoflavones within soy products [23, 24]. It also reduces the levels of anti-nutritional factors, such as protease inhibitors, phytic acid, and phenolic compounds, thereby improving nutritional value and facilitating nutrient absorption [25, 26]. Recent studies have shown that various fermented soy products exhibit beneficial effects in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases [27]. Fermentation with Bacillus licheniformis enhances cognitive function and blood sugar regulation in AD and type 2 diabetes rats [28]. Similarly, fermented soybean products such as Cheonggukjang, produced using Bacillus subtilis MC31 and Lactobacillus sakei 383, were found to increase nerve growth factor (NGF) levels and SOD activity, leading to improved cognitive performance in mice [29]. In addition to preclinical findings, clinical studies have further highlighted the neuroprotective potential of fermented soy. A notable example is DW2009, a product of soybean fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum C29, which enhanced cognitive function in individuals with mild cognitive impairment, associated with a significant correlation between cognitive improvement and serum BDNF level [30].

These findings suggest the potential protective effects of fermented soybeans against AD. FS used in this study is rich in genistein, an isoflavone known for its neuroprotective properties, including the reduction of Aβ aggregation, suppression of inflammation, enhancement of antioxidant activity, and modulation of stress behavior [3133]. Additionally, fermented products are rich in antioxidants and various bioactive compounds, which may influence brain function through the gut-brain axis [34, 35]. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that FS has the potential to prevent neuronal damage and slow the progression of neurodegenerative disorders. This study investigated the potential of FS in preventing or mitigating AD using HT-22 hippocampal neuronal cell lines and 5 × FAD transgenic mice. In addition, the underlying molecular mechanisms of FS-mediated neuroprotection were systematically investigated.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of FS

Soybean pulp was mixed with a Levilactobacillus brevis BCRC12310 solution (106 CFU/mL) at a ratio of 15:1 (w/v) and homogenized for 3 min. The homogenized mixture (150 g) was placed into a sterilized 5-L glass flask and incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. After fermentation, the soybean pulp was dried using a drum dryer. To prepare the solution, 0.1 g of FS was dissolved in 10 mL of PBS, centrifuged at 160 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected and diluted to the required concentrations for experiments.

Composition Analysis of FS

Determination of isoflavone contents was performed as previously reported [36]. Briefly, 100 mg of FS was extracted with 1.0 mL of acetone/water/acetic acid (70:29.5:0.5, v/v/v) at 30 °C for 3 h with continuous shaking. The extract was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 min. The resulting supernatant was subjected to HPLC analysis using a C18 column. Gradient elution was conducted using water and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 2 mL/min, with detection at 262 nm. Determination of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content was conducted based on the method of Rossetti and Lombard [37], with minor modifications (manuscript in preparation). Briefly, 100 mg of FS was extracted with 1.0 mL of 70% ethanol by shaking for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 1530 × g for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-µm nylon filter and analyzed by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-2 C18 column. Isocratic elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min for 30 min, and detection was carried out at 254 nm using a UV/VIS detector. Anthocyanin content was analyzed according to Huang et al. [38]. Cellulose content was determined according to the AOAC method [39].

Cell Cultures

HT-22 is a mouse hippocampal neuronal cell line derived from differentiated HT-4 mouse hippocampal progenitor cells. HT-22 cells are increasingly recognized as a valuable model for studying AD, particularly in relation to neurotoxicity and cholinergic signaling [40, 41]. The primary components of Aβ plaques in neuronal cells are Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42, both of which contain the Aβ25-35 fragment [42, 43]. Aβ25-35 is known to self-aggregate [42] and exert cytotoxic effects [44, 45]. Therefore, this study uses aggregated oligomeric Aβ25-35 (AnaSpec, USA) to induce neurotoxicity in HT-22 cells. HT-22 cells (3 × 103) were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and cultured for 22 h. Afterward, FS was then added, and the cells were cultured for an additional 2 h. Cell viability was assessed at 24 and 48 h post-Aβ25-35 (20 µM) addition using the MTT assay (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The medium was then removed, and 100 µL of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher, USA) to determine cell viability.

NAD +/NADH Assay

The NAD/NADH levels in HT-22 cells were measured using a commercial NAD/NADH assay kit (Abcam, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a crucial coenzyme that acts as an electron carrier in the tricarboxylic acid cycle to the electron transport chain for ATP production. Therefore, the NAD⁺/NADH ratio reflects mitochondrial activity [46].

Lipid Peroxidation Assay

Lipid peroxides are oxidative byproducts formed when reactive oxygen species (ROS) generate free radicals that oxidize lipids [47]. The oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) generates malondialdehyde (MDA), a well-characterized and stable product of lipid peroxidation. MDA is widely recognized as a biomarker for oxidative damage, with its accumulation reflecting the extent of lipid oxidation and cellular oxidative stress in AD [48, 49]. Lipid peroxidation levels in HT-22 cells were analyzed using an MDA assay kit (Abcam, UK). For each group, 2 × 10⁶ cells were lysed in 303 µL of Lysis Solution (300 µL of Lysis Buffer with 3 µL of BHT). The lysates were homogenized and centrifuged at 13,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min to collect the supernatant. The supernatant was then mixed with 600 µL of TBA solution and heated at 95 °C for 1 h. The resulting solution was transferred to a 96-well plate, and absorbance was measured at 532 nm to quantify lipid peroxidation.

Protein Carbonyl Content Assay

Protein carbonylation is an irreversible oxidative modification that primarily affects the side chains of proline, lysine, arginine, and valine residues, resulting in the formation of carbonyl groups (− CO) within proteins [50]. As a hallmark of protein oxidation, carbonyl content is widely used to evaluate the extent of oxidative damage [51]. Protein carboxylation in HT-22 cells was measured using a Protein Carbonyl Content Assay Kit (Abcam, UK). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, colorimetric analysis was performed using a microplate reader that measures absorbance at 375 nm.

Neurite Outgrowth Staining

Neurite outgrowth in HT-22 cells was analyzed using the Neurite Outgrowth Staining kit (Thermo Fisher, USA). A total of 1500 cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and cultured for 36 h. After the medium was removed, the cells were washed three times with PBS and fixed with PFA for 30 min. Following three additional PBS washes, the working stain solution was applied to the cells and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The stain solution was then removed, and the nuclei were stained with DAPI (1:10,000 in PBS) for 5 min. After removing DAPI, background suppression dye was added. Fluorescent images were captured using a fluorescence microscope, and neurite outgrowth was quantified using MetaXpress software (Molecular Devices, USA).

Experimental Animals

This experiment used the 5 × FAD mouse model, B6.Cg-Tg (APPSwFlLon,PSEN1*M146L*L286V) 6799Vas) purchased from Jackson Laboratory (#008703; ME, USA). Wild-type (C57BL/6) mice were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Center (Taipei, Taiwan). The 5 × FAD mouse model carries three mutations in the APP genes, K670N/M671L (Swedish), I716V (Florida), and V717I (London), and two in the PS1 genes, M146L and L286V, which collectively facilitate the accumulation of Aβ and result in early onset of AD pathology [52]. Amyloid plaques appear in the mouse hippocampus by 2 months of age, following the short-term and spatial memory deficits emerging between 3 and 6 months [53, 54]. All experiments were conducted on 5-month-old 5 × FAD and wild-type mice. Animals were grouped based on body weight and balanced for sex (n = 12/group). Four groups were established: wild-type mice with saline (WT + S), wild-type mice with FS (WT + FS), 5 × FAD with saline (TG + S), and 5 × FAD with FS (TG + FS). After 1-week acclimatization, mice were administered orally 4.2 mg/0.1 mL FS or 0.1 mL saline (0.9% NaCl) for 57 days. The dosage of FS was determined based on previous studies using fermented extracts in mice, in which an oral dose of 200 mg/kg was commonly applied [5557]. This was converted to a daily dose of 4.2 mg for the mouse, formulated in 0.1 mL for oral administration. Behavioral tasks, including open field test (OFT), Barnes maze 1 (BM1), Y maze, elevated plus test (EPM), and BM2, were performed on days 45–55. Mice were sacrificed on day 57. Body weight was measured at five time points during the experiment. All of the animal experiments were conducted according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (Permit number: NTNU112017), and all effort was made to minimize animal suffering. All behavioral data were collected and analyzed by EthoVision XT (Noldus Information Technology, Netherlands).

Open Field Test (OFT)

The OFT was conducted to assess motor activity and anxiety-related behavior as described by Lee et al. [58] and Chiang et al. [59]. Mice were habituated to the testing room in their home cages for 30 min before testing. Each mouse was then individually placed in the center of a white acrylic box (30 × 30 × 30 cm) and allowed to explore freely for 10 min under 6 lx illumination. The box was divided into central (15 × 15 cm) and peripheral areas. During the first 5 min, the total distance traveled by each mouse was measured as an indicator of locomotor activity. In the subsequent 5 min, the time each mouse spent in the central area was recorded to assess its anxiety level.

Elevated Plus Maze (EPM)

The EPM test was conducted to assess the anxiety behavior based on mice’s aversion to open elevated spaces. The maze was elevated 50 cm above the ground and consisted of two open arms (L 30 cm, W 5 cm), two enclosed arms (L, 30 cm; W, 5 cm; H, 15 cm), and a central platform (L, 5 cm; W, 5 cm). The task was performed as per previous report [59], with each mouse individually placed at the center and allowed to explore freely for 5 min. The time spent in the open arms was recorded as an anxiolytic level [60, 61].

Y Maze

The Y maze test was performed to evaluate short-term memory based on mice’s natural preference for exploring novel environments [62, 63]. The maze consisted of three identical arms (34 × 5 × 20 cm). The task was conducted as described by Chiang et al. [59], with each mouse placed in the central area and allowed to explore freely for 8 min. The sequence and number of arm entries were recorded. Spontaneous alternation rate was calculated using the formula NumberofuniquetripletarmentriesTotalnumberofarmentries-2×100% serving as an indicator of the mouse’s short-term memory performance.

Barnes Maze (BM)

The BM was utilized to evaluate spatial learning and long-term memory, capitalizing on mice’s aversion to bright and open spaces [64, 65]. The maze consisted of a white circular platform (92 cm diameter, 100 cm elevated) with 20 equally spaced holes (5 cm diameter) around the perimeter. A hole was randomly selected to be the escape hole, beneath which a dark escape box (17.5 × 11 × 3 cm) was placed. The platform was divided into four quadrants, with distinct visual cues surrounding the maze for orientation. The experiment was performed in two phases: training (learning) and probe (memory retrieval). During the training phase (days 1–5, 1 trial/day), each mouse was trained to locate the escape hole. Each trial began with the mouse being placed inside a white box (12.5 × 12.5 × 5 cm) at the center of the maze for 30 s to prevent directional bias. The box was then lifted, allowing the mouse to explore the maze for up to 4 min. If the mouse failed to locate the escape box within the time limit, it was gently guided to the target hole and placed inside the escape box for 30 s to reinforce learning. For the probe phase (days 6 and 9), the escape box was removed. The time that the mouse spent in the target quadrant within 4 min was recorded as an indicator of long-term memory retrieval.

Histopathology and Serology Analysis

Liver and kidney tissues were isolated from sacrificed mice and fixed in 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Blood samples were collected via submandibular vein puncture using microtainers (Becton Dickinson, USA). The blood was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min to isolate serum, which was then stored at − 80 °C. Liver and kidney tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for the evaluation of inflammation and pathological lesions. All samples were sent to the National Animal Research Center for biochemical and pathological assessment. Serum biochemical parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine (CREA), were measured.

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from the hippocampi of mice or HT-22 cells using RNAzol (Molecular Research Center, USA). The RNA was then dissolved in nuclease-free water and stored at − 80 °C. RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, USA). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher, USA), with the following thermal protocol: 25 °C for 5 min, 42 °C for 60 min, and 70 °C for 5 min. Quantitative PCR was conducted using the StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) in a total volume of 20 µL containing specific primers (100 nM) (Table 1), cDNA (100 ng), PowerTrack SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, USA), and nuclease-free water. The thermal cycling conditions were initially heated at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 25 s. Melting curve analysis was then performed one cycle with 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 95 °C for 15 s. Data were analyzed using StepOne software (Applied Biosystems, USA) and Gapdh was used as an internal control for normalization.

Table 1.

Primers used in this study

Locus Primer sequence Product size (bp)
SOD1 Forward AACCAGTTGTGTTGTCAGGAC 139
Reverse CCACCATGTTTCTTAGAGTGAGG
SOD2 Forward CAGACCTGCCTTACGACTATGG 113
Reverse CTCGGTGGCGTTGAGATTGTT
Catalase Forward GGAGGCGGGAACCCAATAG 104
Reverse GTGTGCCATCTCGTCAGTGAA
GPx-4 Forward CCTCCCCAGTACTGCAACAG 147
Reverse GCACACGAAACCCCTGTACT
HO-1 Forward GCCTCCAGAGTTTCCGCATA 275
Reverse AGGAAGCCATCACCAGCTTAAA
GSH-Px Forward GTGCAATCAGTTCGGACACCA 77
Reverse CACCAGGTCGGACGTACTTG
BDNF Forward CCTGCATCTGTTGGGGAG 175
Reverse GCCTTGTCCGTGGACGTTT
IL-1β Forward GAATGCCACCTTTTGACAGTG 119
Reverse TGGATGCTCTCATCAGGACAG
IL-6 Forward CCGGAGAGGAGACTTCACAG 129
Reverse TTGCCATTGCACAACTCTTT
IL-10 Forward AAGGCCATGAATGAATTTGA 198
Reverse TTCGGAGAGAGGTACAAACG
iNOS Forward GTTCTCAGCCCAACAATACAAGA 127
Reverse GTGGACGGGTCGATGTCAC
Bax Forward GATCCAAGACCAGGGTGGCT 198
Reverse CCTTCCCCATTCATCCCAG
Bcl-2 Forward GAACTGGGGGAGGATTGTGG 241
Reverse GCTGAGCAGGGTCTTCAGAG
Gapdh Forward CATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGACTG 153
Reverse ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAG

Western Blot (WB)

Each mouse hippocampal tissue was homogenized using lysis buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40 and 5 mM EDTA], supplemented with protease (Thermo Fisher, USA) and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The homogenized tissue was centrifuged at 13,200 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected. Protein concentration was measured using the Pierce BCA Protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher, USA). For WB, 25 µg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Germany). Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibodies (Table 2) overnight at 4 °C. After washing with TBST, membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Table 2) for 1 h. Target protein signals were developed with ECL detection reagents (Millipore, Germany) and observed using the E-blot Touch Imager (e-Blot Photoelectric Technology, China). Quantification was performed with Image Studio Lite Ver 5.2 software (LICOR Biosciences, USA), and Gapdh was used as an internal loading control.

Table 2.

Antibodies used in this study

Antibodies Manufacturer Catalog Titer of IHC or WB
Primary antibodies
NeuN Millpore MAB377 1:500 (IHC)
6E10 Biolegend 803001 1:500 (IHC)
GFAP GeneTex GTX108711 1:500 (IHC)
Iba-1 FUJIFILM Wako 019–19741 1:500 (IHC)
Phospho-Akt (Ser473) Cell Signaling 4060S 1:1000 (WB)
Akt Cell Signaling 9272S 1:1000 (WB)
NRF2 GeneTex GTX103322 1:1000 (WB)
IDE Abcam ab32216 1:1000 (WB)
NF-κB p65 Cell Signaling 8242S 1:1000 (WB)
Phospho-p65 (Ser536) GeneTex GTX133899 1:1000 (WB)
SOD1 Santa cruz sc-11407 1:1000 (WB)
SOD2 Millpore 06–984 1:1000 (WB)
PSD95 Cell Signaling 2507S 1:1000 (WB)
Synaptophysin Abcam ab14692 1:1000 (WB)
BDNF Abcam ab108319 1:1000 (WB)
GSK3β Cell Signaling 9315S 1:1000 (WB)
Phospho-GSK3β (Ser9) Cell Signaling 9336S 1:1000 (WB)
Bace1 Millpore MAB5308 1:1000 (WB)
Bax BD 556,467 1:1000 (WB)
Bcl-2 Santa cruz ac-7382 1:1000 (WB)
Caspase-3 Cell Signaling 9662S 1:1000 (WB)
Beta-amyloid Invitrogen 700254 1:500 (WB)
GAPDH Arigo ARG66330 1:2000 (WB)
Secondary antibodies
Anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked Cell Signaling 7076S 1:2000 (WB)
Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Cell Signaling 7074S 1:2000 (WB)
Goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L, Biotinylated Vector Laboratories BA-1000 1:500 (IHC)
Goat anti-mouse IgG H&L, biotinylated Abcam ab6788 1:500 (IHC)
Goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 488) Abcam ab150077 1:500 (IHC)

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining

After anesthetizing with 0.4 g/kg Avertin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), mouse perfusion was performed to remove the blood, followed by brain collection, dehydration, and sectioning. The brain sections were rinsed with PBS solution three times and then treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at room temperature for 30 min. The sections were blocked using 2% normal horse serum in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Primary antibodies (Table 2) were then applied to the sections at room temperature overnight, followed by secondary antibodies (Table 2) at room temperature for 1 h, and then incubated with Avidin–biotin complex (Vector Laboratories, USA) for 1 h. Sections were stained with DAB substrate kits (Vector Laboratories, USA), mounted onto slides, visualized using a microscope (Leica SP2, Germany) and quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA).

Statistical Analysis

All experimental data were obtained from at least three independent experiments and expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) tests for multiple comparisons. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Effects of FS on Aβ-Induced HT-22 Neurotoxicity

We used the MTT assay to evaluate the FS cytotoxicity and its protective effects against Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in HT-22 cells, as shown in the diagram (Fig. 1a and Fig. S1a). After 48 h of treatment, FS at concentrations of 0.001 µg/ml and 0.01 µg/ml significantly improved HT-22 cell viability under 20 µM Aβ toxicity (Fig. S1b). These results suggest that FS may exert neuroprotective effects in this in vitro model (Fig. 1b). Additionally, a lipid peroxidation assay was performed to assess oxidative damage to cellular lipids. FS-treated groups (0.001 and 0.01 µg/ml) significantly reduced MDA levels compared to the Aβ-only group (Fig. 1c), indicating that FS effectively mitigated lipid oxidative stress induced by Aβ. In contrast, regarding protein oxidation, although the Aβ group showed significantly higher oxidative stress compared to the control, no significant difference was observed in the levels of protein oxidation between the FS-treated group and the Aβ group (Fig. 1d), suggesting that FS has a limited impact on protein oxidative damage. We also examined the effect of FS on mitochondrial activity with the NAD+/NADH ratio. Mitochondrial activity was markedly decreased in the Aβ group compared to the control group. However, FS treatment did not significantly improve the NAD⁺/NADH ratio (Fig. S1c), implying that FS may not influence mitochondrial function under these conditions.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Effects of FS on in vitro HT-22 cell AD model under Aβ-induced neurotoxicity. a The experimental flow chart. b Cells were pretreated with FS for 2 h and then co-incubated with 20 μM Aβ for 48 h to assess viability using MTT assay. c Results of lipid oxidation stress analysis. d Results of protein oxidation stress analysis. e Results of neurite outgrowth quantitative. f Representative photographs of neurite outgrowth staining observed by microscope. White arrows point to cells with abnormal morphologies; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to the TG + S group (n = 3)

Effects of FS on Neurite Outgrowth in Aβ-Treated HT-22 Cell

We measured the neurite outgrowth of HT-22 cells to evaluate whether FS treatment exerts a neuronal protective effect. The mean neurite outgrowth in the two concentrations of FS-treated groups was significantly increased compared to the control group, whereas the TG + S group showed no significant difference from the control group (Fig. 1e and f). Morphological analysis revealed that Aβ (20 µM) treatment led to a higher proportion of cells with abnormal morphology, while FS-treated groups showed a notable reduction in the morphological deficit (Fig. 1f). These observations suggest that FS treatment may promote neurite outgrowth and improve neuroplasticity under Aβ damage.

Evaluation of Toxicity of FS in Mice

To assess the toxic effect of FS in mice, body weight was monitored at five time points throughout the experiment. No significant differences were observed among the four groups (Fig. S2a). Serum biochemical analysis also showed no significant differences between groups (Fig. S2b-e). Histopathological examination of liver and kidney tissues revealed that all indicators in the FS-treated groups remained below moderate levels (Table S2). Interestingly, moderate glycogen accumulation observed in the TG + S group was reduced to a mild level following FS treatment. Additionally, the OFT conducted to assess motor activity showed no significant differences among the groups (Fig.  S2f). These findings suggest that a long-term administration of FS is well tolerated and does not induce significant toxicity in mice.

Effects of FS on Spatial Cognitive Function in Mice

The experimental design of the animal study is shown in Fig. 2a. During the training phase of BM, both WT and TG mice with FS treatment exhibited a significantly reduced latency to locate the escape box compared to their respective saline-treated controls on day 5 (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the number of animals successfully entering the escape box in the FS-treated group was higher than in the saline-treated group (Fig. S3a). In the first minute of the BM probe 1, the TG + S group spent significantly less time in the target hole compared to the WT + S group, whereas the TG + FS group spent significantly more time, indicating improved memory retention (Fig. S3b). In both BM probes 1 and 2, the TG + S group spent significantly less time in the target zone compared to the WT + S group, and the FS treatment slightly increased the period (Fig. 2c and d and S3c, d). Moreover, the TG + S group exhibited a significantly longer latency to first reach the target hole compared to the WT + S group, and this delay was significantly reduced in the TG + FS group (Fig. 2e). These results suggest that FS administration improves the performance of long-term spatial memory in 5 × FAD mice.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effects of FS on mouse behavioral changes. a The timeline of the animal experimental process. b The time mice required to enter the escape box during the BM training phase. c Heatmap of mice location during the BM probe 2. Red arrows indicate the target, while the white arrow points to a highly intensive non-target area. d Time spent by mice in the target and non-target quadrants during the BM probe 2. e The latency to first reach the target hole. f The short-term memory determined by the spontaneous alternation ratio in the Y maze. g The time mice spent in the center zone of the OFT. h The open arm/closed arm ratio of EPM; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to the TG + S group (n = 12)

Effects of FS on Short-Term Memory and Anxiety Levels

The Y-maze test was performed to evaluate short-term memory. The spontaneous alternation rate of the WT + FS and TG + FS groups was significantly higher than their respective saline-treated controls, suggesting that FS treatment may enhance short-term memory (Fig. 2f). There were no significant differences found in the number of arm entries among the groups (Fig. S4), indicating comparable locomotor activity. The level of anxiety in mice was assessed using the OFT and EPM. In the OFT, the TG + S group spent significantly less time in the center area compared to the WT + S group, while FS treatment significantly increased center zone exploration (Fig. 2g). Similarly, in the EPM, the TG + FS group spent significantly longer time in the open arms compared to the TG + S group (Fig. 2h). Together, these results suggest that FS treatment may alleviate anxiety-like behavior in TG mice.

Effects of FS on the Amyloid Plaque Accumulation in Mouse Hippocampus

Amyloid plaque accumulation is a hallmark of AD pathology, primarily resulting from an imbalance between Aβ production and clearance [66, 67]. IHC staining revealed that the TG + S group exhibited a significant amyloid plaque burden in the hippocampus compared to the WT + S group, whereas FS treatment markedly reduced plaque accumulation (Fig. 3a and b). To investigate whether FS modulates amyloid pathology through the regulation of Aβ production and clearance, we assessed the expression of β-secretase (Bace1) and insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) in the hippocampus of 5 × FAD mice. WB analysis showed Bace1 expression was significantly increased in the TG + S group compared to the WT + S group. FS treatment significantly reduced Bace1 expression in the TG mice (Fig. 3c and d). In contrast, IDE expression was significantly reduced in the TG + S group compared to the WT + S group. FS treatment significantly restored IDE expression levels in the TG mice (Fig. 3c and e). Moreover, FS treatment significantly reduced soluble Aβ oligomers in the hippocampi of 5 × FAD mice (Fig. S5a-c). These findings suggest that FS reducing the amyloid plaque burden could be mediated by inhibiting Bace1 expression to reduce Aβ production and by promoting IDE expression to enhance Aβ clearance.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

FS treatment ameliorates Aβ pathology in the hippocampi of 5 × FAD mice. a Representative IHC analysis using 6E10 antibody in the hippocampus. b Quantification of the 6E10.+ area in hippocampi of mice (n = 4). c WB of IDE and Bace1. Statistical analysis of Bace1 (d) and IDE (e); *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05 compared to the TG + S group (n = 3)

Effects of FS on Synaptic and BDNF Proteins in Mouse Hippocampus

We investigated whether FS treatment activates BDNF signaling in the hippocampus and promotes the expression of synaptic plasticity-related proteins in mice. Both WB and qPCR analyses showed that BDNF levels were significantly reduced in the TG + S group compared to the WT + S group, whereas FS treatment significantly restored BDNF expression in the TG + FS group (Fig. 4a–c). In addition, WB results showed that the levels of PSD95 and synaptophysin were decreased in the TG + S group but were significantly restored following FS treatment (Fig. 4a, d, and e). These findings suggest that FS may modulate BDNF expression and thereby enhance synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus of 5 × FAD mice.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

FS enhances synaptic-associated protein and BDNF expression in hippocampi of 5 × FAD mice. a Results of WB analyses of PSD95, synaptophysin, mature BDNF, and Gapdh. b The mRNA level of BDNF in the mouse hippocampus. Statistical analysis of WB results of mature BDNF (c), PSD95 (d), and synaptophysin (e); *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to the TG + S group (n = 3)

Effects of FS on the NF-κB Signaling and Gliosis in Mouse Hippocampus

NF-κB is a transcription factor composed of p50 and p65 subunits that regulates the expression of various pro-inflammatory cytokines and iNOS genes [68, 69]. To investigate whether the protective effects of FS involve anti-neuroinflammatory mechanisms, we examined the NF-κB pathway and inflammation-related markers in the hippocampus. WB analysis revealed that the TG + S group exhibited significantly elevated phosphorylated p65 (p-p65) compared to the WT + S group. FS treatment significantly reduced p-p65 expression in TG mice (Fig. 5a and b). A similar trend was observed for iNOS expression, which was significantly downregulated following FS treatment (Fig. S6a). However, the increased pro-inflammatory IL-1β and IL-6, and the reduced anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 gene expression in the TG + S group were not significantly altered by the administration of FS (Fig. S6b-d). Immunohistochemical staining for neuroinflammation markers, including Iba-1 (a microglial marker) and GFAP (an astrocyte marker) showed that gliosis was significantly increased in the TG + S group compared to the WT + S group. FS treatment significantly mitigated the levels of both Iba-1 and GFAP, suggesting that FS effectively alleviates neuroinflammation in 5 × FAD mice (Fig. 5c–f). These results suggest that FS treatment inhibits NF-κB signaling and alleviates gliosis in the hippocampus of 5 × FAD mice.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

FS inhibits the NF-κB signaling and gliosis in the hippocampi of 5 × FAD mice. a Expressions of p-p65 and p65 in the hippocampi of mice were analyzed by WB. b Statistical analysis of p-p65/p65 ratio of the 4 groups. c Immunoreactivity of Iba-1 in the hippocampus. d Quantification of Iba-1+ area in the hippocampus (n = 4). e Immunoreactivity of GFAP in the hippocampus. f Quantification of GFAP+ area in the hippocampus (n = 4); ***p < 0.001 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ###p < 0.001 compared to the TG + S group

Effects of FS on the Neuronal Loss in Mouse Hippocampus

IHC analysis was performed to evaluate NeuN expression in the hippocampus. Compared to the WT + S group, NeuN expression was reduced in the TG + S group but significantly restored in the TG + FS group (Fig. 6a and b). Furthermore, the TG + FS group showed decreased apoptosis-related indicators, including Bax, Cleaved-Caspase-3, as well as the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio compared to the TG + S group (Fig. 6c–i). These findings suggest that FS treatment may mitigate neuronal apoptosis and help preserve neuronal survival in 5 × FAD mice.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

FS treatment ameliorates neuronal loss in 5 × FAD mouse hippocampus. a IHC analysis of NeuN in hippocampal neurons. b Quantification of the optical density of NeuN.+. c Immunoblots of Bax, Bcl-2, and Caspase-3 in hippocampal tissues of mice. Statistical analysis of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (d), Caspase-3 (e), and Cleaved-Caspase-3 (f) from the WB. The mRNA expression of Bax (g), Bcl-2 (h), and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (i) in hippocampi of mice; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to the TG + S group (n = 3)

Effects of FS on the Akt/GSK3β/Nrf2 Pathway in Mouse Hippocampus

The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway plays a critical role in regulating cell metabolism, survival, and apoptosis, and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of AD [70, 71]. Activation of this pathway influences various downstream processes, with glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) serving as a key regulator [72, 73]. Inhibition of GSK3β has been reported to enhance nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activity and modulate NF-κB signaling [74, 75]. Therefore, we investigated whether FS modulates the Akt/GSK3β/Nrf2 pathway to promote antioxidant enzyme expression and inhibit NF-κB-mediated neuroinflammation. WB analysis showed that the level of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) was significantly increased in the TG + FS group compared to the TG + S group (Fig. 7a and b). Additionally, in the TG + S group, p-GSK3β and Nrf2 expression levels were significantly lower than those in the WT + S group (Fig. 7a, c, and d), suggesting that FS activated the Akt/GSK3β/Nrf2 pathway in the hippocampi of 5 × FAD mice.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

FS rescues the inactivation of the Akt/GSK3β/Nrf2 pathway in the 5 × FAD hippocampus. a Results of WB analysis of p-Akt, p-GSK3β, and Nrf2. Statistical analysis of p-Akt (b), p-GSK3β (c), and Nrf2 (d); *p < 0.05 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared to the TG + S group (n = 3)

Effects of FS on the Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes in Mouse Hippocampus

Aβ accumulation is known to induce oxidative stress in the AD brain [76, 77]. To investigate the antioxidant effects of FS and its potential involvement in Nrf2 pathway activation, we examined the expression of several antioxidant enzymes’ mRNA levels in the hippocampus of mice. In TG + FS mice, FS treatment significantly upregulated the gene expression levels of SOD1 (Fig. 8a), SOD2 (Fig. 8b), HO-1 (Fig. 8c), GSH-Px (Fig. 8d), and GPx4 (Fig. 8e), but had no significant effect on Catalase expression (Fig. 8f). In addition, WB analysis showed that SOD1 expression was significantly elevated in both the WT-FS and TG-FS groups compared to their respective saline-treated controls (Fig. S7a, b). Although not statistically significant, SOD2 expression exhibited a similar upward trend in FS-treated groups (Fig. S7a, c).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

FS increases the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes in 5 × FAD hippocampus. The relative mRNA expression levels of SOD1 (a), SOD2 (b), HO-1 (c), GSH-Px (d), GPx4 (e), and Catalase (f); *p < 0.05 compared to the WT + S group; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01; ###p < 0.01 compared to the TG + S group (n = 3)

Discussion

AD is the most common neurodegenerative disease, characterized by progressive cognitive decline, synaptic dysfunction, and Aβ plaque accumulation in the brain [78]. It has become an increasingly severe global public health challenge, imposing significant economic and social burdens [79]. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved AD drugs show potential in improving disease outcomes, but the long-term efficacy and safety of these drugs still require further validation. Therefore, the search for safe and effective preventive or therapeutic strategies for AD remains an urgent priority. Research has shown that diet plays a crucial role in modulating the risk and progression of neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [80, 81]. Soybeans and their derived components, such as isoflavones and phytosterols, have been reported to reduce oxidative stress, attenuate inflammation, and improve cognitive functions [82, 83]. This study investigates the potential preventive/therapeutic effects of FS, a fermented soybean pulp, on the progression of AD pathologies in 5 × FAD mice. Research focused on safety and its underlying mechanisms in reducing amyloid plaque accumulation, alleviating neuroinflammation, and enhancing antioxidant defenses.

First, no significant differences were observed in mouse body weight, serum biochemical parameters, liver and kidney histology, or motor activity in the OFT. These findings suggest that long-term administration of FS is safe. An interesting finding was the moderate glycogen accumulation in the livers of 5 × FAD mice reduced by FS treatment. It was reported that AD is associated with metabolic dysfunction, including insulin resistance and impaired glucose regulation, which can affect hepatic glycogen storage [84]. Disruptions in glycogen metabolism may contribute to brain energy deficits seen in AD. We hypothesize that the reduction in hepatic glycogen storage following FS treatment suggests improved glycogen metabolism, leading to increased glucose availability to support the brain’s high energy demands and may repair AD pathology.

The 5 × FAD model shows early Aβ deposition, gliosis, and synaptic dysfunction [85], making it a widely used model in AD research [85, 86]. FS significantly reduced amyloid plaque accumulation in the hippocampus. Mechanistically, FS reduced the expression of BACE1, a key enzyme in Aβ production, and promoted the expression of IDE, an Aβ degradation enzyme, suggesting FS’s dual action in reducing Aβ accumulation. In addition, Aβ deposition induces oxidative stress, which plays a crucial role in AD pathogenesis [76, 87]. FS treatment upregulated expression levels of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD1, SOD2, HO-1, and GSH-Px, in the hippocampus of 5 × FAD mice. However, no significant upregulation was observed in WT + FS mice. This may be due to the intrinsic lower oxidative stress levels in wild-type mice [88, 89].

The NF-κB signaling pathway is a pivotal regulator of many pathways, including neuroinflammation, activation of microglia, oxidative stress-related complications, and apoptosis, all of which have significant implications in AD [9092]. FS treatment reduced p-p65 levels and downregulated iNOS mRNA expression in the hippocampus. IHC analysis showed that FS significantly suppressed gliosis, indicated by reducing the levels of Iba-1 and GFAP. These results suggest that FS mitigates AD-associated neuroinflammation, at least in part, via inhibition of NF-κB signaling. Furthermore, FS treatment rescued the expression of synaptic proteins, PSD95 and synaptophysin, and restored the levels of mature BDNF, which are essential for synaptic plasticity [93]. FS likely exerts its effects by modulating the BDNF-associated AKT/GSK3β/NRF2 pathway [94, 95], as evidenced by increased levels of pAKT/AKT, pGSK3β/GSK3β, and NRF2. This pathway not only promotes antioxidant defense but also suppresses NF-κB-mediated inflammation and Bace1 expression [9698], suggesting that FS achieves its neuroprotective effects by targeting coordinated mechanisms involved in AD pathogenesis. Furthermore, FS contains several bioactive components, including genistein and GABA, which have been individually associated with neuroprotective effects [99102]. In addition to these identified compounds, we cannot exclude the possibility that other components within FS may exert beneficial effects through microbial metabolism or physiological regulation, which could indirectly impact brain function. This is especially relevant considering the complex interaction between diet, gut microbiota, and the central nervous system.

In the animal behavioral experiments, FS improved both short- and long-term memories, as evidenced by increased spontaneous alternation rate in the Y maze and reduced the latency to locate the escape box during BM tests. Additionally, FS reduced anxiety-like behaviors, as shown by increased exploration time in the open arms of the EPM and the central area of the OFT. These findings highlight FS’s potential to counteract the cognitive and emotional impairments associated with AD.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that FS treatment effectively alleviates AD-associated pathologies in 5 × FAD mice by targeting several key mechanisms, including Aβ metabolism, synaptic plasticity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. The multi-targeted actions of FS, particularly its modulation of the Akt/GSK3β/Nrf2 pathway, support its potential as a promising therapeutic strategy for AD. Furthermore, this study highlights the current environmental awareness; the repurposing of soybean pulp not only enhances its potential application in neurodegenerative disease prevention but also promotes sustainable green recycling.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful the assistance of the Molecular Imaging Core Facility of National Taiwan Normal University under the auspices of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Taiwan. We thank Ms. Jui-Hsin Shih and Mr. Ching-Hwa Chang for assisting with behavioral experiments.

Abbreviations

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ACOC

Association of Official Analytical Chemists

Akt

Protein kinase B

APP

Amyloid precursor protein

Amyloid beta

BACE1

β-Secretase

BBB

Blood-brain barrier

BDNF

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BM

Barnes maze

CAT

Catalase

CNS

Central nervous system

EPM

Elevated plus maze

FAD

Familial Alzheimer’s disease

FS

Fermented soybean pulp

GFAP

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

GPx4

Glutathione peroxidase 4

GSH-Px

Glutathione peroxidase

GSK3β

Glycogen synthase kinase 3β

HO-1

Heme oxygenase-1

Iba-1

Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1

IDE

Insulin-degrading enzyme

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

IL-1β

Interleukin 1 beta

IL-6

Interleukin 6

iNOS

Inducible nitric oxide synthase enzyme

NeuN

Neuronal nuclei

NFT

Neurofibrillary tangles

NF-κB

Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

NRF2

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2

OFT

Open field test

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SOD1

Superoxide dismutase type 1

SOD2

Superoxide dismutase type 2

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor-α

WB

Western blot

Author Contribution

CYY designed and conducted the experiments, wrote the manuscript and analyzed data. YHL designed and conducted the experiments and analyzed data. TCL coordinated the study and conducted the experiments. KHC designed the experiments and analyzed the pathology. HMH conceptualized the study, wrote and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by National Taiwan Normal University. This research was supported by grants from the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 112–2622-B-003–001).

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

All of the animal experiments were conducted according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (Permit Number: NTNU112017).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Authors approve for submitting the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chételat G, Teunissen CE, Cummings J, van der Flier WM (2021) Alzheimer’s disease. TLancet 397(10284):1577–1590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johansson M, Stomrud E, Lindberg O, Westman E, Johansson PM, van Westen D, Mattsson N, Hansson O (2020) Apathy and anxiety are early markers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 85:74–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Soria Lopez JA, González HM, Léger GC (2019) Chapter 13 - Alzheimer’s disease. In: Dekosky ST, Asthana S (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, vol 167. Elsevier, pp 231–255. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00013-3 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Ashrafian H, Zadeh EH, Khan RH (2021) Review on Alzheimer’s disease: inhibition of amyloid beta and tau tangle formation. Int J Biol Macromol 167:382–394. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bai R, Guo J, Ye X-Y, Xie Y, Xie T (2022) Oxidative stress: the core pathogenesis and mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev 77:101619. 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Firdous SM, Khan SA, Maity A (2024) Oxidative stress–mediated neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 397(11):8189–8209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xia X, Jiang Q, McDermott J, Han JDJ (2018) Aging and Alzheimer’s disease: comparison and associations from molecular to system level. Aging Cell 17(5):e12802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.He F, Ru X, Wen T (2020) NRF2, a transcription factor for stress response and beyond. Int J Mol Sci 21(13):4777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nguyen T, Nioi P, Pickett CB (2009) The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 284(20):13291–13295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davies DA, Adlimoghaddam A, Albensi BC (2021) Role of Nrf2 in synaptic plasticity and memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 10(8):1884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xiong W, Garfinkel AEM, Li Y, Benowitz LI, Cepko CL (2015) NRF2 promotes neuronal survival in neurodegeneration and acute nerve damage. J Clin Investig 125(4):1433–1445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramsey CP, Glass CA, Montgomery MB, Lindl KA, Ritson GP, Chia LA, Hamilton RL, Chu CT et al (2007) Expression of Nrf2 in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 66(1):75–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Plano LM, Calabrese G, Rizzo MG, Oddo S, Caccamo A (2023) The role of the transcription factor Nrf2 in Alzheimer’s disease: therapeutic opportunities. Biomolecules 13(3):549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Branca C, Ferreira E, Nguyen T-V, Doyle K, Caccamo A, Oddo S (2017) Genetic reduction of Nrf2 exacerbates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 26(24):4823–4835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tarantini S, Valcarcel-Ares MN, Yabluchanskiy A, Tucsek Z, Hertelendy P, Kiss T, Gautam T, Zhang XA et al (2018) Nrf2 deficiency exacerbates obesity-induced oxidative stress, neurovascular dysfunction, blood–brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, amyloidogenic gene expression, and cognitive decline in mice, mimicking the aging phenotype. J Gerontol Ser A 73(7):853–863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salazar M, Rojo AI, Velasco D, de Sagarra RM, Cuadrado A (2006) Glycogen synthase kinase-3β inhibits the xenobiotic and antioxidant cell response by direct phosphorylation and nuclear exclusion of the transcription factor Nrf2. J Biol Chem 281(21):14841–14851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chowdhry S, Zhang Y, McMahon M, Sutherland C, Cuadrado A, Hayes JD (2013) Nrf2 is controlled by two distinct β-TrCP recognition motifs in its Neh6 domain, one of which can be modulated by GSK-3 activity. Oncogene 32(32):3765–3781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cuadrado A (2015) Structural and functional characterization of Nrf2 degradation by glycogen synthase kinase 3/β-TrCP. Free Radical Biol Med 88:147–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen X, Liu Y, Zhu J, Lei S, Dong Y, Li L, Jiang B, Tan L et al (2016) GSK-3β downregulates Nrf2 in cultured cortical neurons and in a rat model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Sci Rep 6(1):20196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Kanninen K, White AR, Koistinaho J, Malm T (2011) Targeting glycogen synthase kinase-3β for therapeutic benefit against oxidative stress in Alzheimer’ s disease: involvement of the Nrf2-ARE pathway. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2011(1):985085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gameiro I, Michalska P, Tenti G, Cores Á, Buendia I, Rojo AI, Georgakopoulos ND, Hernández-Guijo JM et al (2017) Discovery of the first dual GSK3β inhibitor/Nrf2 inducer. A new multitarget therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific reports 7(1):45701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ali T, Kim T, Rehman SU, Khan MS, Amin FU, Khan M, Ikram M, Kim MO (2018) Natural dietary supplementation of anthocyanins via PI3K/Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 pathways mitigate oxidative stress, neurodegeneration, and memory impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 55:6076–6093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singh P, Kumar R, Sabapathy S, Bawa A (2008) Functional and edible uses of soy protein products. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety 7(1):14–28 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rekha C, Vijayalakshmi G (2010) Bioconversion of isoflavone glycosides to aglycones, mineral bioavailability and vitamin B complex in fermented soymilk by probiotic bacteria and yeast. J Appl Microbiol 109(4):1198–1208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cao Z-H, Green-Johnson JM, Buckley ND, Lin Q-Y (2019) Bioactivity of soy-based fermented foods: a review. Biotechnol Adv 37(1):223–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xue J, Wu J, Ji Y, Sun S, Gao Y, Yang H, Wu J (2024) Effect of microbial fermentation on the quality of soybean meal. Int J Food Sci Technol 59(1):72–83 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Domańska A, Orzechowski A, Litwiniuk A, Kalisz M, Bik W, Baranowska-Bik A (2021) The beneficial role of natural endocrine disruptors: phytoestrogens in Alzheimer’s disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021(1):3961445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang HJ, Kwon DY, Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Jung DY, Kang HJ, Kim DS, Kang S et al (2015) Fermenting soybeans with Bacillus licheniformis potentiates their capacity to improve cognitive function and glucose homeostaisis in diabetic rats with experimental Alzheimer’s type dementia. Eur J Nutr 54:77–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Go J, Kim JE, Kwak MH, Koh EK, Song SH, Sung JE, Kim DS, Hong JT et al (2016) Neuroprotective effects of fermented soybean products (Cheonggukjang) manufactured by mixed culture of Bacillus subtilis MC31 and Lactobacillus sakei 383 on trimethyltin-induced cognitive defects mice. Nutr Neurosci 19(6):247–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hwang Y-H, Park S, Paik J-W, Chae S-W, Kim D-H, Jeong D-G, Ha E, Kim M et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus plantarum C29-fermented soybean (DW2009) in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a 12-week, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Nutrients 11(2):305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Soni M, Rahardjo TBW, Soekardi R, Sulistyowati Y, Yesufu-Udechuku A, Irsan A, Hogervorst E (2014) Phytoestrogens and cognitive function: a review. Maturitas 77(3):209–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Uddin MS, Kabir MT (2019) Emerging signal regulating potential of genistein against Alzheimer’s disease: a promising molecule of interest. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology 7:197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Duan X, Li Y, Xu F, Ding H (2021) Study on the neuroprotective effects of Genistein on Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and behavior 11(5):e02100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schneider E, Balasubramanian R, Ferri A, Cotter PD, Clarke G, Cryan JF (2024) Fibre & fermented foods: differential effects on the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Proc Nutr Soc: 1–16. 10.1017/S0029665124004907 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Balasubramanian R, Schneider E, Gunnigle E, Cotter PD, Cryan JF (2024) Fermented foods: harnessing their potential to modulate the microbiota-gut-brain axis for mental health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 158:105562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huang C, Kuo M-I, Chen B-Y, Lu C-P, Yeh C-C, Jao C-H, Lai Y-C, Hsieh J-F (2024) Effect of radio-frequency drying on the physicochemical properties and isoflavone contents of fermented black bean Dregs. Processes 12(7):1294 [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rossetti V, Lombard A (1996) Determination of glutamate decarboxylase by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 681(1):63–67. 10.1016/0378-4347(96)88202-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jhan JK, Chung YC, Chen GH, Chang CH, Lu YC, Hsu CK (2016) Anthocyanin contents in the seed coat of black soya bean and their anti-human tyrosinase activity and antioxidative activity. Int J Cosmet Sci 38(3):319–324. 10.1111/ics.12300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Redondo-Cuenca A, Villanueva-Suárez MJ, Mateos-Aparicio I (2008) Soybean seeds and its by-product okara as sources of dietary fibre. Measurement by AOAC and Englyst methods. Food Chemistry 108:1099–1105 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Liu J, Li L, Suo WZ (2009) HT22 hippocampal neuronal cell line possesses functional cholinergic properties. Life Sci 84(9–10):267–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Prasansuklab A, Sukjamnong S, Theerasri A, Hu VW, Sarachana T, Tencomnao T (2023) Transcriptomic analysis of glutamate-induced HT22 neurotoxicity as a model for screening anti-Alzheimer’s drugs. Sci Rep 13(1):7225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Naldi M, Fiori J, Pistolozzi M, Drake AF, Bertucci C, Wu R, Mlynarczyk K, Filipek S et al (2012) Amyloid β-peptide 25–35 self-assembly and its inhibition: a model undecapeptide system to gain atomistic and secondary structure details of the Alzheimer’s disease process and treatment. ACS Chem Neurosci 3(11):952–962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Song Y, Li P, Liu L, Bortolini C, Dong M (2018) Nanostructural differentiation and toxicity of amyloid-β25-35 aggregates ensue from distinct secondary conformation. Sci Rep 8(1):765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Harris ME, Hensley K, Butterfield DA, Leedle RA, Carney JM (1995) Direct evidence of oxidative injury produced by the Alzheimer’s β-amyloid peptide (1–40) in cultured hippocampal neurons. Exp Neurol 131(2):193–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen G-f, Xu T-h, Yan Y, Zhou Y-r, Jiang Y, Melcher K, Xu HE (2017) Amyloid beta: structure, biology and structure-based therapeutic development. Acta Pharmacol Sin 38(9):1205–1235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mayevsky A, Chance B (2007) Oxidation–reduction states of NADH in vivo: from animals to clinical use. Mitochondrion 7(5):330–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ayala A, Muñoz MF, Argüelles S (2014) Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2014(1):360438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bradley-Whitman MA, Lovell MA (2015) Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation in Alzheimer disease (AD): an update. Arch Toxicol 89:1035–1044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Buccellato FR, D’Anca M, Fenoglio C, Scarpini E, Galimberti D (2021) Role of oxidative damage in Alzheimer’s disease and neurodegeneration: from pathogenic mechanisms to biomarker discovery. Antioxidants 10(9):1353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dalle-Donne I, Aldini G, Carini M, Colombo R, Rossi R, Milzani A (2006) Protein carbonylation, cellular dysfunction, and disease progression. J Cell Mol Med 10(2):389–406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fedorova M, Bollineni RC, Hoffmann R (2014) Protein carbonylation as a major hallmark of oxidative damage: update of analytical strategies. Mass Spectrom Rev 33(2):79–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Girard SD, Jacquet M, Baranger K, Migliorati M, Escoffier G, Bernard A, Khrestchatisky M, Féron F et al (2014) Onset of hippocampus-dependent memory impairments in 5XFAD transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hippocampus 24(7):762–772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jawhar S, Trawicka A, Jenneckens C, Bayer TA, Wirths O (2012) Motor deficits, neuron loss, and reduced anxiety coinciding with axonal degeneration and intraneuronal Aβ aggregation in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of aging 33(1):196.e129-196.e140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pádua MS, Guil-Guerrero JL, Lopes PA (2024) Behaviour hallmarks in Alzheimer’s disease 5xFAD mouse model. Int J Mol Sci 25(12):6766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee HJ, Hwang YH, Kim DH (2018) Lactobacillus plantarum C29-fermented soybean (DW2009) alleviates memory impairment in 5XFAD transgenic mice by regulating microglia activation and gut microbiota composition. Mol Nutr Food Res 62(20):1800359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yang X, Chen J, Zhang C, Chen H, Liu Y (2012) Evaluation of antioxidant activity of fermented soybean meal extract. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 6(24):1774–1781 [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hu T, Chen R, Qian Y, Ye K, Long X, Park K-Y, Zhao X (2022) Antioxidant effect of Lactobacillus fermentum HFY02-fermented soy milk on D-galactose-induced aging mouse model. Food Sci Human Wellness 11(5):1362–1372. 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.04.036 [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee Y-S, Lai D-M, Huang H-J, Lee-Chen G-J, Chang C-H, Hsieh-Li HM, Lee G-C (2021) Prebiotic lactulose ameliorates the cognitive deficit in Alzheimer’s disease mouse model through macroautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy pathways. J Agric Food Chem 69(8):2422–2437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chiang M-K, Lin T-C, Lin K-H, Chang Y-C, Hsieh-Li HM, Lai D-M (2024) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy attenuated the motor coordination and cognitive impairment of polyglutamine spinocerebellar Ataxia SCA17 mice. The cerebellum 23(2):401–417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Katha UTA, Begum Y, Mortuza MG, Sharmin S, Rafiquzzaman M, Biswas S, Saleh MA (2024) Phytoconstituents of Chloranthus elatior as a potential adjunct in the treatment of anxiety disorders: in vivo and in silico approaches. Heliyon 10(23):e40728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Sakai M, Yu Z, Picotin R, Kasahara T, Kikuchi Y, Ono C, Hino M, Kunii Y et al (2025) Experimenters’ sex modulates anxiety-like behavior, contextual fear, and microglial oxytocin transcription in mice. Behavioural Brain Research 483:115480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liang Y, Xie S, Jia J (2025) Pathway-based network medicine identifies novel natural products for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s research & therapy 17:43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Qi Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhu H, Wang J, Xu X, Jin S, Wang C et al (2025) Curcuma wenyujin extract alleviates cognitive deficits and restrains pyroptosis through PINK1/Parkin mediated autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease. Phytomedicine 139:156482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jo D, Choi SY, Ahn SY, Song J (2025) IGF1 enhances memory function in obese mice and stabilizes the neural structure under insulin resistance via AKT-GSK3β-BDNF signaling. Biomed Pharmacother 183:117846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Cong P, Wu Q, Wan H, Huang X, Li X, Li Z et al (2025) Connexin 43 contributes to perioperative neurocognitive disorder by attenuating perineuronal net of hippocampus in aged mice. Cell Mol Life Sci 82(1):37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wildsmith KR, Holley M, Savage JC, Skerrett R, Landreth GE (2013) Evidence for impaired amyloid β clearance in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s research & therapy 5:1–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cai W, Wu T, Chen N (2023) The amyloid-beta clearance: from molecular targets to glial and neural cells. Biomolecules 13(2):313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sivamaruthi BS, Raghani N, Chorawala M, Bhattacharya S, Prajapati BG, Elossaily GM, Chaiyasut C (2023) NF-κB pathway and its inhibitors: a promising frontier in the management of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines 11(9):2587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Verma Y, Sachdeva H, Kalra S, Kumar P, Singh G (2023) Unveiling the complex role of NF-κB in Alzheimer’s disease: insights into brain inflammation and potential therapeutic targets. Georgian Med News 342:133–141 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kumar M, Bansal N (2022) Implications of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt (PI3K-Akt) pathway in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 59(1):354–385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pan J, Yao Q, Wang Y, Chang S, Li C, Wu Y, Shen J, Yang R (2024) The role of PI3K signaling pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in aging neuroscience 16:1459025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Llorens-Marítin M, Jurado J, Hernández F, Ávila J (2014) GSK-3β, a pivotal kinase in Alzheimer disease. Front Mol Neurosci 7:46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shri SR, Manandhar S, Nayak Y, Pai KSR (2023) Role of GSK-3β inhibitors: new promises and opportunities for Alzheimer’s disease. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin 13(4):688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yousef MH, Salama M, El-Fawal HA, Abdelnaser A (2022) Selective GSK3β inhibition mediates an Nrf2-Independent anti-inflammatory microglial response. Mol Neurobiol 59(9):5591–5611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kaur K, Narang RK, Singh S (2025) Role of Nrf2 in oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease: regulation of Nrf2 by different signaling pathways. Curr Mol Med 25(4):372–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tamagno E, Guglielmotto M, Vasciaveo V, Tabaton M (2021) Oxidative stress and beta amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Which comes first: the chicken or the egg? Antioxidants 10(9):1479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Karapetyan G, Fereshetyan K, Harutyunyan H, Yenkoyan K (2022) The synergy of β amyloid 1–42 and oxidative stress in the development of Alzheimer’s disease-like neurodegeneration of hippocampal cells. Sci Rep 12(1):17883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Beata BK, Wojciech J, Johannes K, Piotr L, Barbara M (2023) Alzheimer’s disease-biochemical and psychological background for diagnosis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci 24(2):1059. 10.3390/ijms24021059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li X, Feng X, Sun X, Hou N, Han F, Liu Y (2022) Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2019. Frontiers in aging neuroscience 14:937486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Arora S, Santiago JA, Bernstein M, Potashkin JA (2023) Diet and lifestyle impact the development and progression of Alzheimer’s dementia. Front Nutr 10:1213223. 10.3389/fnut.2023.1213223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kheirouri S, Alizadeh M (2019) Dietary Inflammatory potential and the risk of neurodegenerative diseases in adults. Epidemiol Rev 41(1):109–120. 10.1093/epirev/mxz005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lu Y, An Y, Lv C, Ma W, Xi Y, Xiao R (2018) Dietary soybean isoflavones in Alzheimer’s disease prevention. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 27(5):946–954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sharma N, Tan MA, An SSA (2021) Phytosterols: potential metabolic modulators in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci 22(22):12255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Huang Z, Lin HWK, Zhang Q, Zong X (2022) Targeting Alzheimer’s disease: the critical crosstalk between the liver and brain. Nutrients 14(20):4298. 10.3390/nu14204298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 85.Forner S, Kawauchi S, Balderrama-Gutierrez G, Kramár EA, Matheos DP, Phan J, Javonillo DI, Tran KM et al (2021) Systematic phenotyping and characterization of the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific data 8(1):270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ismeurt C, Giannoni P, Claeysen S (2020) The 5× FAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Diagnosis and management in dementia. Academic Press, pp 207–221
  • 87.Guglielmotto M, Giliberto L, Tamagno E, Tabaton M (2010) Oxidative stress mediates the pathogenic effect of different Alzheimer’s disease risk factors. Frontiers in aging neuroscience 2:1276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pandareesh MD, Chauhan V, Chauhan A (2018) Walnut supplementation in the diet reduces oxidative damage and improves antioxidant status in transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 64(4):1295–1305. 10.3233/jad-180361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Peng A, Gao Y, Zhuang X, Lin Y, He W, Wang Y, Chen W, Chen T et al (2019) Bazhu decoction, a traditional Chinese medical formula, ameliorates cognitive deficits in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Pharmacol 10:1391. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 90.Jha NK, Jha SK, Kar R, Nand P, Swati K, Goswami VK (2019) Nuclear factor-kappa β as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 150(2):113–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jong Huat T, Camats-Perna J, Newcombe EA, Onraet T, Campbell D, Sucic JT, Martini A, Forner S et al (2024) The impact of astrocytic NF-κB on healthy and Alzheimer’s disease brains. Sci Rep 14(1):14305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Thakur S, Dhapola R, Sarma P, Medhi B, Reddy DH (2023) Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: current progress in molecular signaling and therapeutics. Inflammation 46(1):1–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lu B, Nagappan G, Lu Y (2014) BDNF and synaptic plasticity, cognitive function, and dysfunction. Neurotrophic factors: 220:223–250 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 94.Lu B, Nagappan G, Guan X, Nathan PJ, Wren P (2013) BDNF-based synaptic repair as a disease-modifying strategy for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci 14(6):401–416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Culbreth M, Aschner M (2018) GSK-3β, a double-edged sword in Nrf2 regulation: implications for neurological dysfunction and disease. F1000Research 7:1043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ly PT, Wu Y, Zou H, Wang R, Zhou W, Kinoshita A, Zhang M, Yang Y, Cai F, Woodgett J (2012) Inhibition of GSK3β-mediated BACE1 expression reduces Alzheimer-associated phenotypes. J Clin Invest 123(1):224–235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 97.Lauretti E, Dincer O, Praticò D (2020) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-molecular cell research 1867(5):118664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Limantoro J, de Liyis BG, Sutedja JC (2023) Akt signaling pathway: a potential therapy for Alzheimer’s disease through glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta inhibition. The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 59(1):147 [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Wan MLY, Monteiro AR, Nutt DJ, Swinny JD (2024) From bugs to brain: unravelling the GABA signalling networks in the brain–gut–microbiome axis. Brain 148(5):1479–1506. 10.1093/brain/awae413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Braga JD, Thongngam M, Kumrungsee T (2024) Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a potential postbiotic mediator in the gut–brain axis. npj Science of Food 8(1):16. 10.1038/s41538-024-00253-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Devi KP, Shanmuganathan B, Manayi A, Nabavi SF, Nabavi SM (2017) Molecular and therapeutic targets of genistein in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 54(9):7028–7041. 10.1007/s12035-016-0215-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Fuloria S, Yusri MAA, Sekar M, Gan SH, Rani NNIM, Lum PT, Ravi S, Subramaniyan V et al (2022) Genistein: a potential natural lead molecule for new drug design and development for treating memory impairment. Molecules 27(1):265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Molecular Neurobiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES