Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1986 Aug;204(2):122–127. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198608000-00004

Influence of peritoneal lavage on objective prognostic signs in acute pancreatitis.

I Ihse, A Evander, I Gustafson, J T Holmberg
PMCID: PMC1251251  PMID: 2427042

Abstract

In 39 patients with severe attacks of acute pancreatitis, a longitudinal study was done with respect to the influence of peritoneal lavage on objective prognostic signs (WBC, blood-glucose, serum-calcium, hematocrit, serum-creatinine, arterial pO2, base deficit); amylase activities in peritoneal fluid, serum, and urine; serum-hemoglobin, serum-Na, serum-K, and plasma-insulin. In addition to standard care in the ICU, half of the patients (N = 19) were randomly treated with peritoneal lavage. Peritoneal lavage did not influence overall mortality (13%), incidence of major complications (36%), or hospital stay (23 +/- 7 days). None of the prognostic signs was significantly influenced by lavage. Amylase concentration in peritoneal fluid was significantly reduced in the lavaged group after 6 hours compared to 24 hours in controls. Serum and urinary amylase decreased 12 hours earlier in the lavaged group, indicating an efficiency of the lavage procedure per se. Still, this study did not reveal any beneficial clinical effects of peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis.

Full text

PDF
122

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Creutzfeldt W., Schmidt H. Aetiology and pathogenesis of pancreatitis. (Current concepts). Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1970;6:47–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Imrie C. W., Benjamin I. S., Ferguson J. C., McKay A. J., Mackenzie I., O'Neill J., Blumgart L. H. A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1978 May;65(5):337–341. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800650514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lankisch P. G., Koop H., Winckler K., Schmidt H. Continuous peritoneal dialysis as treatment of acute experimental pancreatitis in the rat. I. Effect on length and rate of survival. Dig Dis Sci. 1979 Feb;24(2):111–116. doi: 10.1007/BF01324737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mayer A. D., McMahon M. J., Corfield A. P., Cooper M. J., Williamson R. C., Dickson A. P., Shearer M. G., Imrie C. W. Controlled clinical trial of peritoneal lavage for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1985 Feb 14;312(7):399–404. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198502143120703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Osborne D. H., Imrie C. W., Carter D. C. Biliary surgery in the same admission for gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1981 Nov;68(11):758–761. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800681103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ranson J. H., Rifkind K. M., Turner J. W. Prognostic signs and nonoperative peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Aug;143(2):209–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodgers R. E., Carey L. C. Peritoneal lavage in experimental pancreatitis in dogs. Am J Surg. 1966 Jun;111(6):792–794. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(66)90174-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stone H. H., Fabian T. C. Peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Jun;150(6):878–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES