Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1986 Aug;204(2):133–135. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198608000-00006

Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma.

I K Pedersen, J Christiansen, K Hint, P Jensen, J Olsen, P E Mortensen
PMCID: PMC1251253  PMID: 3741004

Abstract

Anorectal function was studied in 13 patients with carcinoma of the rectum 6-12 cm from the anal verge, which was treated by low anterior resection (LAR), and in 13 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Patients were studied before and 3 and 12 months after operation. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were the same in patients and control subjects and were decreased only moderately after surgery, with a slight increase in maximum squeeze pressure 12 months after operation. Three of the patients had an inverse rectoanal reflex before operation, and two had no reflex at all. After operation, only two patients showed a normal rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and none gained a normal reflex within 12 months after surgery. Rectal compliance was significantly reduced before operation, compared to control subjects, and was still significantly lower 3 months after operation. After 12 months, however, rectal compliance had returned to preoperative level in all but two patients with coloanal anastomosis, who still emptied the bowel 4-5 times daily.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cortesini C. Anorectal reflex following sphincter-saving operations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980 Jul-Aug;23(5):320–326. doi: 10.1007/BF02586838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Heppell J., Kelly K. A., Phillips S. F., Beart R. W., Jr, Telander R. L., Perrault J. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1982 Apr;195(4):435–443. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198204000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iwai N., Hashimoto K., Yamane T., Kojima O., Nishioka B., Fujita Y., Majima S. Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982 Oct;25(7):652–659. doi: 10.1007/BF02629534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Keighley M. R., Matheson D. Functional results of rectal excision and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1980 Oct;67(10):757–761. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800671021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirkegaard P., Christiansen J., Hjortrup A. Anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument. Am J Surg. 1980 Aug;140(2):312–314. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Luke M., Kirkegaard P., Lendorf A., Christiansen J. Pelvic recurrence rate after abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection for rectal cancer before and after introduction of the stapling technique. World J Surg. 1983 Sep;7(5):616–619. doi: 10.1007/BF01655339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nicholls R. J., Ritchie J. K., Wadsworth J., Parks A. G. Total excision or restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1979 Sep;66(9):625–627. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800660908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Suzuki H., Matsumoto K., Amano S., Fujioka M., Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg. 1980 Sep;67(9):655–657. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Williams N. S., Price R., Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg. 1980 Mar;67(3):203–208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES