Abstract
The concept of en bloc removal of tissue surrounding the esophagus was applied to intrathoracic esophageal cancers, and the first 80 cases were operated on by this technique between 1969 and 1981. Analysis of prognostic factors showed that only penetration through the esophageal wall and lymph node spread influenced survival. Since 1981, a new staging system based on wall penetration (W) and lymph nodes (N), as well as systemic metastases (M), and similar to the modified Dukes' system for colon cancer has been used to select patients before and during surgery for en bloc resection if favorable pathology (W1, N0, or N1) could be anticipated. When curative resection was not attainable, based on preoperative and operative staging, a standard esophagectomy was considered for relief of symptoms when necessary. From July 1981 to June 1984, 68 esophageal cancers were referred to us, and 31 were resected by the en bloc method, 21 by standard esophagectomy, and 16 were not resected. The success of preoperative staging was confirmed, as only nine of the 31 en bloc cases demonstrated both W2 and N2 pathology. The proportion of W2N2 cases subjected to en bloc esophagectomy was less (p less than 0.01) than that in the preceding series. This selection of cases showed a favorable deviation in the survival curve following en bloc esophagectomy since 1981 compared to the earlier interval. Patients treated by en bloc esophagectomy had a significantly greater survival than they did following standard esophagectomy at all time intervals after 6 months. There was no difference in hospital mortality or complications between the two operations. Further evidence for the value of the new staging system was shown by the significant difference in survival curves between those with favorable versus unfavorable staging and treated by en bloc esophagectomy. Among all cases resected between 1981 and 1984, 18-month survival in W1 stage was 67% compared to 35% for W2 disease. Survival with N0 disease was 58% versus 43% for N1 stage and 21% for N2 stage. The favorable survival rates after en bloc resection in those with limited (less than W2N2) disease support the concept of selecting patients for curative surgery based on preoperative and operative staging. Preoperative radiation therapy caused a significant decline in patient survival at 6 and 12 months and has been abandoned.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Akiyama H., Kogure T., Itai Y. The esophageal axis and its relationship to the resectability of carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 1972 Jul;176(1):30–36. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197207000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belsey R., Hiebert C. A. An exclusive right thoracic approach for cancer of the middle third of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1974 Jul;18(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65712-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Copeland E. M., Miller L. D., Jones R. S. Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg. 1968 Dec;116(6):875–881. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(68)90458-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOGAN A. THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963 Aug;46:150–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orringer M. B. Palliative procedures for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 1983 Aug;63(4):941–950. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skinner D. B., Dowlatshahi K. D., DeMeester T. R. Potentially curable cancer of the esophagus. Cancer. 1982 Dec 1;50(11 Suppl):2571–2575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skinner D. B. En bloc resection for neoplasms of the esophagus and cardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Jan;85(1):59–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skinner D. B., Walther B. C., Riddell R. H., Schmidt H., Iascone C., DeMeester T. R. Barrett's esophagus. Comparison of benign and malignant cases. Ann Surg. 1983 Oct;198(4):554–565. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198310000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]