Skip to main content
Infectious Diseases & Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Infectious Diseases & Clinical Microbiology
. 2025 Sep 25;7(3):273–282. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2025.513

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on CLABSI Rates and Antibiotic Resistance: A Multicenter Study in Türkiye

Elif Sargın-Altunok 1,*, Şiran Keske 2, Ayşe Batırel 1, Hüseyin Bilgin 3, Ezgi Gülten 4, Şirin Menekşe 5, Abdullah Gölbol 6, Petek Konya 7, Lütfiye Nilsun Altunal 8, Deniz Özer 9, Ali Asan 10, Ayşe Deniz-Yüksel 11, Özlem Akdoğan 12, Tuğba Yanık-Yalçın 13, Fethiye Akgül 14, Işıl Deniz Alıravcı 15, Taliha Karakök 16, Ahmet Şahin 17, İlknur Erdem 18, Esra Gürbüz 19, Fatma Yekta-Ürkmez 20, Zehra Çağla Karakoç 21, Bahar Kaçmaz 22, Özge Eren-Korkmaz 23, Meltem Karslıoğlu 24, Merve Arslan 25, Müge Toygar-Deniz 26, Mehtap Aydın 8, Neşe Demirtürk 7, Alpay Azap 4, Önder Ergönül 2
PMCID: PMC12532015  PMID: 41111492

Abstract

Objective

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted infection control practices in healthcare settings. Previous studies have reported increased rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), particularly during the early stages and peak periods of the pandemic. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CLABSI rates in Türkiye over a four-year period from 2019 to 2022.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected CLABSI data from hospitals across various regions of Türkiye between 2019 and 2022. The study period was divided into three phases: pre-pandemic, early pandemic, and late pandemic. Demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality rates, and microbiological data were analyzed. Pathogen distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns were compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. 

Results

A total of 25 hospitals participated in the study. The CLABSI rates per 1000 catheter days were 4.26 in 2019, 4.13 in 2020, 3.68 in 2021, and 3.53 in 2022. Across all periods, 3238 pathogens were identified. Gram-negative bacteria predominated both before and during the pandemic, with Acinetobacter baumannii (18.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.8%) being the most common. Notably, an increase in carbapenem and colistin resistance in K. pneumonia was observed during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period.

Conclusions

In Türkiye, the predominant causative agents of CLABSI did not change during the pandemic, with Klebsiella spp. and A. baumannii being most frequently isolated. However, the rise in CLABSI-associated mortality during the pandemic highlights the broader impact of healthcare system disruptions. 

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, COVID-19 pandemic, central line-associated bloodstream infections, healthcare-associated infections


Highlights.

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced compliance with infection control practices and inappropriate antimicrobial use in healthcare settings negatively affected central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates.

  • Central line-associated bloodstream infection-related mortality increased during both early and late pandemic periods compared to the pre-pandemic period. 

  • In Türkiye, the distribution of CLABSI pathogens remained predominantly Gram-negative throughout the pandemic, with Acinetobacter baumannii

  • Centralline-associated bloodstream infection caused by K. pneumoniae

  • Resistance to colistin and carbapenems in K. pneumoniae

Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are common yet largely preventable through adherence to evidence-based guidelines. In 2005, Türkiye implemented a national infection control program, which led to significant reductions in HAI rates, including a 50% decrease in central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) between 2008 and 2017 (1). This result was in parallel with data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), which also showed significant progress in HAI prevention (2).

However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted infection control practices in healthcare settings worldwide. In particular, the rapid surge in critically ill patients overwhelmed hospital capacities, making it difficult to sustain proper infection control protocols (3). Multiple studies have reported increased CLABSI rates during the pandemic, particularly in its early phases and at the height of COVID-19 prevalence (4-10).

Central line-associated bloodstream infections are a significant ongoing problem, contributing to increased mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and higher healthcare costs. Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CLABSI rates may help inform infection prevention priorities and guide future preparedness efforts in the event of new epidemics or pandemics. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CLABSI in Türkiye, a country with one of the highest antibiotic resistance rates among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member states, over a four-year period from 2019 to 2022 (11).

Materials and Methods

Study Population

Study Design

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population, as well as CLABSI-related fatality rates, were analyzed. Microorganism distributions and antibiotic resistance rates were compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Additionally, trends in resistance rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens were examined across the same time intervals. 

Definitions

Microorganisms were identified using automated systems routinely used in each center. Antibiotic susceptibility was assessed via disc diffusion or minimum inhibitory concentration testing, and results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines (14). Multidrug-resistant pathogens were defined as those exhibiting acquired resistance to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories (15). According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Enterobacteriaceae are critical and high-priority MDR pathogens due to the urgent need for new antibiotics (16).

Statistical Analysis

Time series analysis was performed to show trends in CLABSI and catheter utilization rates throughout the study period. All analyses were performed using STATA software (version 15, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA), with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Results

Central line–associated bloodstream infection rates per 1000 catheter days were 4.26 in 2019, 4.13 in 2020, 3.68 in 2021, and 3.53 in 2022. Catheter utilization and CLABSI rates by year are presented in Table 1. There was no significant correlation between CLABSI and catheter utilization rates (Pearson’s r = –0.725; p=0.275). 

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics, clinical signs and symptoms, and surgical procedures in patients with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) (n=28).

Parameter 2019 2020 2021 2022
CLABSI (n) 807 787 770 866
Patients-days 2,451,665 2,051,339 2,386,990 2,423,418
Catheter-days 189,179 190,343 209,171 245,091
Catheter utilization rate (catheter-days/patient-days) 0.077 0.092 0.087 0.101
CLABSI rate (per 1000 catheter-days) 4.26 4.13 3.68 3.53

A total of 2863 CLABSI cases were included in the study, of which 2666 (93%) occurred in intensive care units (ICUs). Of these, 28.4% occurred during the pre-pandemic period, 44.6% during the early pandemic, and 27% during the late pandemic period. Time series analysis revealed a statistically significant decrease in CLABSI rates over the study period (multiple R²=0.9475; adjusted R²= 0.9212; F (1, 2)=36.07; p=0.027). However, the change in catheter utilization rates was not statistically significant (multiple R²=0.7463; adjusted R²=0.6195. F(1, 2)=5.883; p=0.136).

The gender distribution of patients with CLABSI was consistent across the three periods: 470 of 812 (57.9%) in the pre-pandemic period, 744 of 1276 (58.3%) in the early pandemic period, and 452 of 775 (58.3%) in the late pandemic period (p=0.97). The median age of the patients was 66 years during the pre-pandemic period, 65 years during the early pandemic, and 68 years during the late pandemic (p=0.0001). A total of 392 patients had been diagnosed with COVID-19 within 30 days prior to their CLABSI diagnosis, and 321 of these had a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR test. Hospital mortality rates increased from 60.1% the pre-pandemic period to 70.8% and 71.7% in the early and late pandemic periods, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical features of the study population.

Pre-pandemic n=812 n (%) Early pandemic n=1276 n (%) Late pandemic n=775 n (%) p
Age, median (IQR), years 66 (53–77) 65 (53–74) 68 (57–79) 0.0001
Sex (male) 470 (57.9) 744 (58.3) 452 (58.3) 0.97
Chronic illness 525 (64.7) 831 (65.1) 544 (70.2 0.03
Cancer 111 (13.7) 166 (13) 122 (15.7) 0.22
Immunosuppressive drug use 60 (7.4) 111 (9.3) 72 (9.3) 0.28
Neutropenia 38 (3.5) 49 (3.8) 31 (4) 0.84
Diabetes mellitus 220 (27.1) 362 (28.4) 247 (31.9) 0.09
Hypertension 283 (34.9) 505 (39.6) 350 (45.2) <0.001
Chronic kidney disease 116 (14.3) 148 (11.6) 96 (12.4) 0.19
Hemodialysis 68 (8.4) 102 (8) 64 (8.3) 0.95
Chronic liver disease 8 (1) 24 (1.9) 11 (1.4) 0.25
Autoimmune disease 9 (1.1) 26 (2) 14 (1.8) 0.27
Catheter insertion site
Jugular 241 (29.7) 440 (34.5) 266 (34.3) 0.052
Subclavian 166 (20.4) 157 (12.3) 65 (8.4) <0.001
Femoral 193 (23.8) 329 (25.8) 183 (23.6) 0.43
Unknown 212 (26.1) 350 (27.4) 261 (33.7) -
Additional central catheter insertion 519 (63.9) 813 (63.7) 498 (64.3) 0.97
ICU admission 750 (92.4) 1198 (93.9) 719 (92.8) 0.36
Fatality 488 (60.1) 903 (70.8) 556 (71.7) <0.001

IQR: Interquartile range, ICU: Intensive care unit.

In total, 3238 pathogens were identified. Gram-negative bacteria were the most common pathogens in both the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. The most prevalent pathogens were A. baumannii (18.6%), K. pneumoniae (17.8%), and Candida non-albicans (11.5%). Among Gram-positive organisms, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) were most common in the pre-pandemic and early pandemic periods, while Enterococcus faecium predominated in the late pandemic period. The other pathogens are presented in Table 3

Table 3.

Distribution of pathogens isolated from patients with central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) by study period.

Microorganism Pre-pandemic n (%) Early pandemic n (%) Late pandemic n (%) Total n (%)
Gram-negative bacteria 437 (48.2) 779 (53.7) 466 (52.9) 1682 (51.9)
A. baumannii 158 (17.4) 291 (20) 153 (17.4) 602 (18.6)
K. pneumoniae 150 (16.5) 248 (17.1) 180 (20.4) 578 (17.8)
P. aeruginosa 62 (6.8) 79 (5.4) 58 (6.6) 199 (6.1)
Stenotrophomonas spp. 21 (2.3) 92 (6.3) 26 (3) 139 (4.3)
E. coli 27 (3) 50 (3.4) 28 (3.2) 105 (3.2)
Enterobacter spp. 19 (2.1) 19 (1.3) 21 (2.4) 59 (1.8)
Gram-positive bacteria 192 (21.2) 313 (21.6) 202 (22.9) 707 (21.8)
E. faecium 50 (5.5) 81 (5.6) 74 (8.4) 205 (7.2)
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 64 (7.1) 107 (7.4) 46 (5.2) 217 (6.7)
E. faecalis 41 (4.5) 90 (6.2) 54 (6.1) 185 (5.7)
S. aureus 37 (4.1) 35 (2.4) 28 (3.2) 100 (3.1)
Fungi 180 (19.8) 234 (16.1) 156 (17.7) 570 (17.6)
C. non-albicans 111 (12.2) 160 (11) 103 (11.7) 374 (11.5)
C. albicans 69 (7.6) 74 (5.1) 53 (6) 196 (6.3)
Other pathogens* 98 (10.8) 124 (8.6) 57 (6.5) 279 (8.6)
Total (n) 907 1450 881 3238

*Other pathogens include Aeromonas

Although quinolone resistance in Gram-negative pathogens showed a continuous upward trend, the change was not statistically significant (p=0.2). A. baumannii exhibited the highest carbapenem ­resistance, increasing from 94% to 97%. Notably, K. pneumonia showed a significant increase in resistance to both carbapenems (p=0.015) and colistin (p=0.004) during the pandemic periods compared to the pre-pandemic period. Changes in colistin resistance in Escherichia coli (p=0.39) and P. aeruginosa (p=0.1) were not statistically significant. 

Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in K. pneumoniae also increased during the pandemic, and resistance was detected in 33% of P. aeruginosa isolates. The changes in antibiotic resistance rates of pathogens between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.

Antibiotic resistance rates of selected pathogens causing central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in thepre-pandemic and pandemic periods.

Quinolone resistance


Meropenem resistance


Colistin resistance


Pathogen Pre-pandemic (%) Early pandemic (%) Late pandemic (%) p Pre-pandemic (%) Early pandemic (%) Late pandemic (%) p Pre-pandemic (%) Early pandemic (%) Late pandemic (%) p
K. pneumoniae 111/144 (77) 208/245 (85) 151/178 (85) 0.1 84/146 (58) 170/237 (72) 120/176 (68) 0.015 23/112 (21) 69/188 (37) 55/142 (39) 0.004
E. coli 14/24 (58) 29/47 (62) 20/27 (74) 0.4 2/22 (9) 3/44 (7) 2/25 (8) 0.9 2/15 (13) 1/34 (3) 1/14 (7) 0.39
P. aeruginosa 28/58 (48) 37/75 (49) 32/58 (55) 0.7 29/58 (50) 34/74 (46) 33/57 (58) 0.4 7/45 (15) 2/54 (4) 3/43 (7) 0.1
A. baumannii 147/150 (98) 281/283 (99) 145/148 (98) 0.5 147/156 (94) 278/282 (99) 145/150 (97) 0.38 4/148 (3) 17/255 (7) 5/130 (4) 0.84

Discussion

The surge in critically ill patients in ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic had a detrimental effect on essential infection control practices within healthcare institutions. Several factors contributed to the rise in healthcare-associated infections, including the restructuring of hospitals to accommodate increasing admissions, heightened workloads for healthcare workers, the use of immunomodulatory treatments in COVID-19 patients, and prolonged catheter use.

Studies from various countries have demonstrated that CLABSI showed the most significant increase among HAIs during the pandemic (4-10). In our multicenter study, which included four years of data from 25 hospitals across TÜrkiye, 44.6% of all CLABSI cases occurred during the early pandemic period. However, unlike many international reports, we did not observe an overall increase in CLABSI rates during the pandemic in Türkiye. 

One potential reason for the stable CLABSI rates is the disruption of routine surveillance practices, particularly during the early stages of the pandemic. Central line-associated bloodstream infection cases may have been underdiagnosed due to hesitancy in obtaining blood cultures—especially during periods of patient surges—and because bacteremia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia often did not meet standardized diagnostic surveillance criteria. 

This finding contrasts with other studies. For instance, a seven-country evaluation examining the impact of COVID-19 on HAIs in ICUs reported an 85% increase in CLABSI rates during the pandemic's first year compared to 2019 (17). Similarly, national data from the United States indicated significant increases in HAI rates during the first year of the pandemic, with CLABSI showing the most pronounced rise (10). A global review assessing the impact of COVID-19 on CLABSI revealed that 17 out of 21 studies reported a significant increase in CLABSI incidence and rates during the pandemic (18). 

Recurrent risk factors identified in previous studies, such as increased workloads, the redeployment of staff, and overwhelmed healthcare personnel, negatively impacted essential infection control practices and likely contributed to the globally increased CLABSI rates during the pandemic. In contrast, the absence of a marked increase in CLABSI rates in our study may be partly explained by the heterogeneity of the participating centers. Several of the hospitals included were state institutions with lower patient volumes, and many experienced significant decreases in hospital admissions during the peak phases of the pandemic.

Studies conducted during the pandemic period indicate that CLABSI developed more readily in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. One study from Türkiye demonstrated that, despite shorter lengths of stay in COVID-19 ICUs, CLABSI rates were higher compared to general ICUs, with infections developing more quickly in patients with COVID-19 (19). Central line-associated bloodstream infection significantly increases patient morbidity and mortality. A multinational study comparing CLABSI outcomes between critically ill patients with ot without COVID-19 found that those with SARS-CoV-2 were more susceptible to CLABSI and had significantly higher mortality rates (58.7% vs 40%) (20). In line with these findings, our study observed an increase in CLABSI-related mortality during both the early and late pandemic periods compared to the pre-pandemic period.

In TÜrkiye, the distribution of CLABSI pathogens remained predominantly Gram-negative during the pandemic, with A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae being the most frequently identified pathogens (19,21,22). In contrast, some studies reported a predominance of Gram-positive bacteria, particularly Enterococcus species and coagulase-negative staphylococci, during the pandemic period (20,23-25). The pandemic also significantly impacted global patterns of antibiotic resistance. Our findings demonstrated a notably high and increasing rate of colistin resistance in K. pneumoniae, along with rising trend in carbapenem resistance. A systematic review of studies published from December 2019 to May 2022 reported colistin resistance rates during the pandemic period as 2.5% for A. baumannii, 21.1% for K. pneumoniae, and 4% for P. aeruginosa (26). In comparison, our study found higher colistin resistance among K. pneumoniae isolates, with resistance continuing to rise following the pandemic. In Türkiye, Ergönül et al. (27) reported a colistin resistance rate of 6% in K. pneumoniae in 2013, whereas our study documented a rate of 39% in 2022. Similarly, carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae increased sharply, from 38% in 2013 to 68% in 2022.

Our study has several limitations. Firstly, in addition to hospitals that managed COVID-19 patients during the pandemic, state hospitals not designated as pandemic centers were also included. Second, because of its retrospective design, data on patients’ baseline clinical severity, prognostic scores, and antimicrobial treatment regimens were not available. Third, CLABSI rates were not compared separately for wards and ICUs, which may introduce variability due to heterogeneity in care settings. Finally, our findings could not be directly compared with national surveillance data, which are reported annually and stratified by ICU type, whereas our study was based on pandemic phases.

In conclusion, this multicenter study demostrated that CLABSI rates in Türkiye decreased from 4.26 to 3.53 per 1000 catheter days between 2019 and 2022, contrary to global trends that reported increases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gram-negative bacteria—notably A. baumannii (18.6%) and K. pneumoniae (17.8%)—remained the most common pathogens. A significant increase in antimicrobial resistance was observed, especially for carbapenems (68%) and colistin (39%) in K. pneumoniae, compared to pre-pandemic levels. Additionally, hospital mortality linked to CLABSI increased from 60.1% pre-pandemic to 71.7% in the late pandemic period. These findings underscore the importance of sustained infection prevention efforts and antimicrobial stewardship, particularly during disruptions to the healthcare system, such as pandemics.

Additional Information

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital on April 27, 2023, with the approval number 2023/514/248/6.

Informed Consent

N.A.

Peer-review

Externally peer-reviewed

Author Contributions

Concept – E.S.A., Ş.K., Ö.E., M.A.; Design – E.S.A., Ş.K.; Supervision – E.S.A., Ş.K.; Data Collection and/or Processing – All authors; Analysis and/or Interpretation – E.S.A., Ş.K.; Literature Review – All authors; Writer – All authors; Critical Reviews – All authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Acknowledgement

We dedicate this report to Asst. Prof. Dr. Emel Azak, who passed away on July 29, 2024, in honor of her significant contributions to this study.

Scientific Presentation

This study was presented as an oral presentation by Elif Sargın Altunok at the 24th Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Congress (KLIMIK 2024), held on March 6–9, 2024.

References

  1. Gozel MG, Hekimoglu CH, Gozel EY, Batir E, McLaws ML, Mese EA. National Infection Control Program in Turkey: The healthcare associated infection rate experiences over 10 years. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(7):885–892. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Data summary of HAIs in the US: assessing progress 2006–2016. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [Jul 31, 2024]. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/data-summary-assessing-progress.html
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2020 national and state healthcare-associated infections progress report. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [Jul 31, 2024]. 2021. https://arpsp.cdc.gov/profile/national-progress/united-states
  4. Lastinger LM, Alvarez CR, Kofman A, Konnor RY, Kuhar DT, Nkwata A, et al. Continued increases in the incidence of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) during the second year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44(6):997–1001. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fakih MG, Bufalino A, Sturm L, Huang RH, Ottenbacher A, Saake K, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): The urgent need to refocus on hardwiring prevention efforts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(1):26–31. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Advani SD, Sickbert-Bennett E, Moehring R, Cromer A, Lokhnygina Y, Dodds-Ashley E, et al. The disproportionate impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare-associated infections in community hospitals: Need for expanding the infectious disease workforce. CDC Prevention Epicenters Program Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3) doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buetti N, Ruckly S, de Montmollin E, Reignier J, Terzi N, Cohen Y, et al. COVID-19 increased the risk of ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: a case-cohort study from the multicentric OUTCOMEREA network. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(2):180–187. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06346-w. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(5):640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwaber MJ, Temkin E, Lobl R, Schechner V, Nutman A, Carmeli Y. Hospital-acquired bacterial infections in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Israel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44(9):1437–1442. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alsuhaibani M, Kobayashi T, McPherson C, Holley S, Marra AR, Trannel A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on an infection prevention and control program, Iowa 2020-2021. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(3):277–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Weiner-Lastinger LM, Pattabiraman V, Konnor RY, Patel PR, Wong E, Xu SY, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections in 2020: A summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(1):12–25. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.362. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(1):137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Embracing a One Health framework to fight antimicrobial resistance. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Jul 31, 2024]. 2023. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/embracing-a-one-health-framework-to-fight-antimicrobial-resistance_ce44c755-en.html
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN): bloodstream infection event (central line-associated bloodstream infection and non-central line associated bloodstream infection) Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [Jul 31, 2024]. 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/4psc_clabscurrent.pdf
  13. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü Ulusal sağlık hizmeti ilişkili enfeksiyonlar sürveyans rehberi. Ankara: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. [Jul 31, 2024]. 2017. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/bulasici-hastaliklar-ve-erken-uyari-db/Dokumanlar/Rehberler/Ulusal_Saglik_Hizmeti_Iliskili_Enfeksiyonlar_Surveyans_Rehberi_Versiyon_1.pdf
  14. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) EUCAST guidelines and documents. Växjö: The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [Jul 31, 2024]. http://www.eucast.org
  15. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO bacterial priority pathogens list. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO) [Jul 31, 2024]. 2024. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/376776/9789240093461-eng.pdf?sequence=1
  17. Rosenthal VD, Myatra SN, Divatia JV, Biswas S, Shrivastava A, Al-Ruzzieh MA, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on health care-associated infections in intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;(118):83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Satta G, Rawson TM, Moore LSP. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) impact on central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI): a systematic review. Infect Prev Pract. 2023;5(4):100313. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sargın-Altunok E, Batırel A, Ersöz Z, Akay-Güven D, Öztürk-Aydemir S. [Does COVID-19 increase the risk of central-line-associated bloodstream infections_?] Klimik Derg. 2022;35(3):191–195. doi: 10.36519/kd.2022.4272. Turkish. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Buetti N, Tabah A, Loiodice A, Ruckly S, Aslan AT, Montrucchio G, et al. Different epidemiology of bloodstream infections in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 critically ill patients: a descriptive analysis of the Eurobact II study. Eurobact 2 study group. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04166-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Aydın M, Azak E, Bilgin H, Menekse S, Asan A, Mert HTE, et al. Changes in antimicrobial resistance and outcomes of health care-associated infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(8):1737–1742. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04140-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Menekşe Ş, Deniz S. Secondary infections in COVID-19 patients: A two-centre retrospective observational study. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022;16(8):1294–1301. doi: 10.3855/jidc.15637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weiner-Lastinger LM, Haass K, Gross C, Leaptrot D, Wong E, Wu H, et al. Pathogens attributed to central-line-associated bloodstream infections in US acute-care hospitals during the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44(4):651–654. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Giacobbe DR, Labate L, Tutino S, Baldi F, Russo C, Robba C, et al. Enterococcal bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a case series. Ann Med. 2021;53(1):1779–1786. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1988695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bonazzetti C, Morena V, Giacomelli A, Oreni L, Casalini G, Galimberti LR, et al. Unexpectedly high frequency of enterococcal bloodstream infections in coronavirus disease 2019 patients admitted to an Italian ICU: An observational study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(1) doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sulayyim HJA, Ismail R, Hamid AA, Ghafar NA. Antibiotic resistance during COVID-19: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):11931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ergönül Ö, Aydin M, Azap A, Başaran S, Tekin S, Kaya Ş, et al. Healthcare-associated Gram-negative bloodstream infections: antibiotic resistance and predictors of mortality. Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; Healthcare-Related Infections Study Group. J Hosp Infect. 2016;94(4):381–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Diseases & Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

RESOURCES