Abstract
Background
Malaria remains a significant public health challenge in District Shangla, Pakistan, exacerbated by ecological diversity, seasonal transmission, and limited health infrastructure. This 5-year epidemiological study aimed to assess malaria trends, species distribution, risk factors, and intervention outcomes from 2020 to 2024.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed on 130,401 laboratory-confirmed malaria cases identified from 572,696 febrile individuals screened between 2020 and 2024. Data were collected through district health surveillance systems and field-based reports. Epidemiological indicators, including Annual Parasite Incidence (API), Test Positivity Rate (TPR), and Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER), were analyzed alongside demographic, diagnostic, seasonal, and behavioral data. The impacts of interventions were assessed by comparing trends before and after the interventions.
Results
Malaria incidence increased sharply from 2020 to 2023, with API rising from 2 to 61 per 1000 populations, TPR from 3 to 32%, and ABER from 5 to 19%. In 2024, these indicators declined (API: 46/1000; TPR: 27%; ABER: 18%) following targeted interventions. Plasmodium vivax comprised 95% of cases, followed by Plasmodium falciparum (4.6%) and mixed infections (0.4%). Only 18% of cases were microscopy-confirmed; the remainder relied on rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Adults ≥ 15 years accounted for 67% of cases, with a male predominance (54%). Seasonal peaks varied: P. vivax peaked in July–August, while P. falciparum peaked in October–November. Risk factors included poor treatment adherence (only 14% completed primaquine regimens), absence of G6PD screening, misinformation, reliance on informal providers, and population mobility.
Discussion
The rise in malaria burden reflects climate-sensitive transmission, diagnostic gaps, and inadequate treatment adherence. The decline in 2024 corresponds to coordinated responses, including deploying 78 diagnostic and treatment centers, expanded IRS, LLIN distribution, and health education campaigns. However, persistent gaps in vector surveillance, diagnostic accuracy, primaquine adherence, and health worker training hinder progress.
Conclusion
Malaria control in Shangla requires an integrated, climate-adaptive elimination strategy. Priorities include enhanced vector control, improved diagnostic access, universal G6PD testing, community-based health education, and use of short-course antimalarial regimens with full primaquine adherence to sustain control and advance toward elimination.
Keywords: Plasmodiumvivax, Plasmodiumfalciparum, Malaria epidemiology, Shangla, Primaquine adherence, Seasonal transmission, Vector control, G6PD deficiency, Climate change, Pakistan
Background
Malaria remains a significant global public health challenge, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, with an estimated 249 million cases and 608,000 deaths reported globally in 2022, the majority of which occurred in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Underage children (below 5 years) and pregnant women continue to bear the highest burden of the disease. Despite progress in prevention and treatment, emerging drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains and insecticide-resistant mosquito vectors threaten malaria control efforts [2]. Climate change further exacerbates the risk by expanding the geographic range of Anopheles mosquitoes [3].
In Pakistan, malaria is among the top 5 diseases by burden, in rural and peri-urban regions where climatic and socioeconomic conditions favor transmission. It is reported that 3.5 million suspected cases and over 400,000 confirmed cases occurred in [4]. The current study area (district) has one of the highest incidences of malaria reported. Malaria in Pakistan is unevenly distributed, with the highest incidence reported in Baluchistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Sindh, and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). Baluchistan reported the highest malaria burden, with an API of approximately 70.3 per 1000 population, reflecting widespread transmission and limited access to preventive services [5]. Sindh province, which accounted for nearly 49.4% of the national malaria cases, had a high API, though lower than Baluchistan, due to persistent transmission in riverine and flood-prone districts [6]. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), including the merged tribal areas (formerly FATA), the API ranged between 11.0 and 12.9 per 1000, placing it among the moderately high transmission zones [1]. These values underscore the urgent need for region-specific interventions under Pakistan’s National Malaria Strategic Plan 2021–2035 [7]. The districts bordering Afghanistan and Iran account for 37% of cases and annual parasite incidence (API) exceeding 4.5 per 1000 population [8]. Plasmodium vivax dominates (79.1% of cases), though Plasmodium falciparum prevalence has risen to 16.3%, particularly in regions where P. vivax was historically endemic [9]. Recent estimates indicate a national pooled prevalence of 23.3%, with extreme variability across districts—ranging from 1.7% in Larkana to 99.8% in Karachi. Malaria transmission in Pakistan follows seasonal patterns, peaking in the post-monsoon period (July–November) due to increased mosquito breeding sites. The primary vector, Anopheles stephensi, thrives in irrigated agricultural areas and urban water storage containers, facilitating transmission in both rural and urban settings [10]. Recent climate shifts, including erratic rainfall and rising temperatures, have expanded malaria’s geographic range, with previously low-risk districts now reporting outbreaks [11]. Socioeconomic factors, such as low-income households with limited access to bed nets and healthcare services [4], and behavioral factors, such as outdoor nighttime activities and delays in seeking treatment [12], further exacerbate disease transmission.
Pakistan has implemented multifaceted control strategies, achieving a 45% reduction in malaria cases between 2015 and 2020 through the expanded use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) [13]. Nonetheless, significant challenges remain, including climate-driven increases in transmission—malaria cases are projected to rise by 0.8–3.5% by the 2060 s under high-emission scenarios [9], and gaps in surveillance, particularly in regions like Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir [10].
In districts such as Shangla, assessing the malaria burden is essential for protecting public health and improving socioeconomic conditions. The region’s population primarily depends on daily wages, making households particularly vulnerable during outbreaks. In endemic areas, malaria transmission seasons can severely impact entire families, with multiple members—sometimes all—becoming ill and unable to work. This not only endangers health but also disrupts livelihoods.
The present study investigated the underlying causes of the recent surge in malaria cases despite routine control interventions. It aims to assess current epidemiological trends, identify key risk factors contributing to transmission, and evaluate the effectiveness of existing control strategies in order to propose more targeted and sustainable solutions.
Methods
Study design, area, and period
This cross-sectional, epidemiological sero-surveillance study was conducted in the Shangla part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. The total population of the area is about 891,252, with approximately 524,480 in the endemic area of four tehsils, like Besham, Chakisar, Martung, and Puran. This study was done from January 2020 to December 2024.
Investigation of the socio-economic status of the study area
The economy of the study area mainly relies on subsistence farming and labour migration. Widespread poverty, limited healthcare access, and poor infrastructure increase the region’s vulnerability to infectious disease spread.
Sample selection and risk factors
A total of 78 health facilities were selected for the study; five offered microscopy-based malaria diagnosis, while the remaining facilities relied on rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in malaria-endemic areas. Epidemiological data were obtained from each designated malaria health facility. The data were categorized by gender, age group, pregnancy status, Plasmodium species, diagnostic method, and associated risk factors.
Microscopy services for malaria diagnosis
Microscopy remains a gold standard for malaria diagnosis in many resource-limited settings. In Shangla district, only five public health facilities are equipped with microscopy services for malaria diagnosis. As per established WHO guidelines, standard procedures for preparing thick and thin blood smears, staining with Giemsa, and microscopic examination are followed for the detection and identification of Plasmodium species. The identification of Plasmodium species is based on morphological characteristics and staining properties. Detailed protocols for these methods are well-documented in WHO manuals and other authoritative sources [4, 14, 15].
Rapid diagnostic tests
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are critical in malaria detection, especially in remote settings where microscopy services are unavailable. In this study, SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.v test kits (Abbott) were used, which are widely recognized for their ease of use, minimal training requirements, and quick results [16]. Detailed protocols and performance evaluations are available in the WHO and manufacturer documentation [17, 18]. These tests have been widely adopted in field epidemiology due to their portability, reliability, and effectiveness in enabling rapid treatment decisions and strengthening disease surveillance.
Questionnaire
A structured questionnaire was administered to 1000 laboratory-confirmed malaria-positive patients in identified hotspot areas as part of an epidemiological survey designed to assess trends and identify consistent increases in case burden (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
Fig. 1.
This structured questionnaire was used to collect detailed epidemiological data from 1000 laboratory-confirmed malaria-positive patients in hotspot areas of District Shangla. It includes demographic, environmental, behavioral, and treatment-related variables to assess trends, risk factors, and patterns in malaria transmission
Fig. 2.
Yearly trends in key malaria surveillance indicators in Shangla District (2020–2024). The graph illustrates variations in (ABER), Test Positivity Rate (TPR), (API), and P. falciparum ratio. A marked increase in all indicators peaked in 2023, followed by a decline in 2024
Fig. 3.
Seasonal trends in malaria species distribution over 3 years in Shangla District
Fig. 4.
Five-year trend of malaria cases in Shangla District (2020–2024). The graph illustrates a steady increase in all types of malaria cases—Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, and mixed infections—reaching a peak in 2023, followed by a notable decline in 2024, likely reflecting the impact of intensified intervention and treatment strategies
Fig. 5.

Microscopic view of Plasmodium spp. parasites in stained blood smears
Data analysis
Data from the designated health facilities were collected during routine monitoring and recorded in the maintained FM-2 and FM-3 registers. FM-2 documents outpatient consultations, while FM-3 captures details of disease-specific cases, including confirmed malaria diagnoses, treatments provided, and follow-up outcomes. These standardized national formats ensure consistency and accuracy in health data reporting across both public and private sector facilities [5].
Graph Pad Prism version 9.0.2 was used for data analysis. For continuous variables, means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated, while frequencies and percentages were reported for categorical variables. The chi-squared (χ2) test was applied to assess associations between categorical variables, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant (Tables 1, 2).
Table 1.
Tabulated values of Annual trends of ABER, TPR, API, and P. Falciparum ratio
| Years | Annual blood examination rate (ABER) (%) | Test positivity rate (TPR) (%) | Annual parasite incidence (API) (%) | Pf ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 2021 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 4 |
| 2022 | 13 | 22 | 28 | 7 |
| 2023 | 19 | 32 | 61 | 6 |
| 2024 | 18 | 27 | 46 | 3 |
Table 2.
Treatment history and primaquine adherence among 1000 confirmed P. vivax malaria cases in Shangla District
| Total cases | 1000 | Only chloroquine no primaquine | Incomplete dose of primaquine | Completed primaquine with improper dosage | Complete dosage of primaquine and chloroquine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | 135 | – | – | – | – |
| Previously reported | 865 | 360 (41.6%) | 221 (25.5%) | 164 (18.95%) | 120 (13.87%) |
Results
Epidemiological surveillance of malaria in Shangla
From 2020 to 2024, a total of 572,696 individuals were screened for malaria, of which 129,401 (22.6%) were confirmed positive. Of these, 23,239 cases (18%) were diagnosed using microscopy, while 107,162 cases (82%) were confirmed through rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Plasmodium vivax was the predominant species, accounting for 123,646 cases (95%), followed by P. falciparum (6154 cases; 4.6%) and mixed infections (601 cases; 0.4%).
Regarding gender distribution, 70,641 cases (54.18%) were reported in males and 59,760 cases (45.82%) in females, including 1034 pregnant women (1.7%). Age-wise, 8239 cases (6%) occurred in children aged 0–4 years, 35,313 cases (27%) in the 5–14 age group, and the majority, 86,849 cases (67%), were in individuals aged 15 years and older.
Chi-square analysis showed that the distribution of malaria species over the 5-year period was statistically significant (χ2 = 724.4, p < 0.001). A notably higher prevalence was also seen in individuals over 15 years old (χ2 = 1193, p < 0.0001) and among males compared to females (χ2 = 385.8, p = 0.0001). These results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3.
Annual malaria screening and diagnostic outcomes in District Shangla (2020–2024)
| Years | RDTs | Microscopy | Total positive | P. vivax | P. falciparum | Mixed cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1441 | 178 | 1621 | 1586 | 33 | 02 |
| 2021 | 5395 | 301 | 5697 | 5462 | 232 | 03 |
| 2022 | 23,882 | 1575 | 25,457 | 23,747 | 1576 | 134 |
| 2023 | 45,024 | 9927 | 55,330 | 51,890 | 3036 | 404 |
| 2024 | 31,420 | 11,258 | 42,296 | 40,961 | 1277 | 62 |
| Total | 107,162 | 23,239 | 130,401 | 123,646 | 6154 | 601 |
Table 4.
Demographic characteristics of population, Gender-, age-, and pregnancy-specific distribution of malaria cases in Shangla District from 2020 to 2024
| Years | Male | Female | Pregnant women | 0–4 years | 5–14 years | 15 + years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1089 | 533 | 8 | 13 | 124 | 1505 |
| 2021 | 3365 | 2332 | 133 | 446 | 1360 | 3891 |
| 2022 | 13,840 | 11,612 | 192 | 2038 | 6598 | 16,819 |
| 2023 | 29,491 | 25,841 | 467 | 4061 | 15,615 | 35,654 |
| 2024 | 22,856 | 19,442 | 234 | 1681 | 11,616 | 28,999 |
| Total | 70,641 (54.%) | 59,760 (46%) | 1034 (1.7%) | 8239 (6.3%) | 35,313 (27%) | 86,849 (66.6%) |
This table summarizes key malaria surveillance indicators and trends over a 5-year period.
Epidemiological survey
An additional epidemiological survey using structured questionnaires was conducted at the start of 2024, in malaria hotspot health facilities, to gather information not typically captured during routine data collection. The survey included 1000 confirmed P. vivax cases. Among these, 865 individuals (86.5%) reported a previous history of malaria infection, while 135 cases (13.5%) were newly diagnosed. Among the 865 patients with prior infections, 360 patients (41.6%) had received only chloroquine and avoided primaquine, instead resorting to non-recommended antimalarial treatments, 221 patients (25.5%) initiated primaquine therapy but failed to complete the full course, and 164 individuals (18.95%) completed treatment but received incorrect dosages. Only 120 individuals (13.87%) adhered to the full recommended regimen of both primaquine and chloroquine; however, they experienced reinfection, likely due to new transmission events rather than relapse.
Seasonal trends & year-wise burden
Here is the seasonal trends graph, which shows the peaks of Plasmodium species. Plasmodium vivax cases peaked consistently during the mid-monsoon months of July and August. Plasmodium falciparum and mixed infections showed delayed peaks in the post-monsoon period, primarily in October and November, reflecting differences in vector ecology and parasite biology.
The number of confirmed cases increased significantly each year. In 2020, 48,836 individuals were screened, and 1621 (3.3%) tested positive. In 2021, 66,678 were screened, with 5697 (8.5%) confirmed cases. In 2022, 118,249 individuals were screened, and 25,457 (21.5%) tested positive.
The upward trend continued in 2023, with 175,410 screenings and 55,330 (31.5%) confirmed cases, and 163,523 individuals were screened, with 42,296 (25.9%) confirmed positive for malaria in 2024.
Plasmodium species distribution (P. vivax, P. falciparum)
The table presents a 5-year overview (2020–2024) of malaria surveillance in Shangla District, Pakistan, including total screenings, diagnostic methods used (RDTs and microscopy), and species-specific breakdown of confirmed positive cases. A total of 572,696 individuals were screened, with 130,401 (23%) testing positive for malaria. Malaria cases rose significantly between 2020 and 2023, peaking at 55,330 cases 2023. A notable decline occurred in 2024, with 42,296 cases, potentially indicating the impact of primaquine mass administrations (Tables 5, 6).
Table 5.
Year-wise distribution of malaria diagnostic methods used in Shangla District
| Years | Total Screenings | RDTs | Microscopy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 48,836 | 1441 | 178 |
| 2021 | 66,678 | 5395 | 301 |
| 2022 | 118,249 | 99,491 | 18,758 |
| 2023 | 175,410 | 45,024 | 9902 |
| 2024 | 163,523 | 31,295 | 11,233 |
| Total | 572,696 | 107,037 | 23,189 |
Table 6.
Stock received from provincial government 2024
| Name of items | Total stock received |
|---|---|
| Fendona 10% SC | 167 Letters |
| Icon (2.5 E.C) | 88 letters |
| Temephose liq 500 EC | 50 kg |
| LLINs | 11,250 |
| Thermal fogger hand held | 2 |
| Spray pumps | 14 |
| PPEs | 24 KITS |
Risk factors
The table below shows the gender- and age-wise distribution of confirmed malaria cases in Shangla District over a 5-year period (2020–2024), with special emphasis on vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and children. Among females, 1.7% occurred in pregnant women, a high-risk group for malaria complications. Children aged 0–4 years represented 6.3% of total cases. The 15+ age group consistently showed the highest burden, indicating occupational or behavioral exposure risks.
Microscopy services
In District Shangla, microscopy-based malaria diagnosis was conducted at five key public health facilities, accounting for 18% of the total confirmed cases. Microscopy confirmed infections of P. falciparum, P. vivax, and mixed species, while also providing detailed demographic insights. This technique enabled accurate identification of species, as well as gender- and age-specific distributions, supporting targeted treatment and surveillance efforts.
Rapid diagnostic tests
In the study area, a total of 67 health facilities—including both public and private centers—utilized Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) as the primary method for malaria screening. These facilities accounted for the diagnosis of approximately 82% of all confirmed malaria cases from 2020 to 2024. RDTs proved essential in enhancing early detection and case management, particularly in remote or resource-limited settings where microscopy services are unavailable. Their ease of use, rapid turnaround time (15–30 min), and minimal training requirements enabled widespread deployment, contributing significantly to the timely diagnosis and treatment of P. vivax, P. falciparum, and mixed infections across diverse populations.
Malaria control strategies
The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) provides national guidelines and technical support. In 2023, the UNICEF provided 11,250 LLINS, which were distributed in the hotspot areas. The provincial government provides technical and logistic support to the district team for anti-vectors activities, awareness campaigns, health education programmes, also in collaboration with The Indus Hospital Network backed by Global funds, support in Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) in tehsil Puran, also their district team established 78 malaria free diagnostic and treatment centers across the endemic areas. The district administration involved the line departments in multi-tasking approaches to control the VBDs in the district.
Discussion
This 5-year surveillance and survey-based investigation revealed a sustained rise in P. vivax malaria burden in District Shangla, Pakistan, from 2020 to 2023. This increase was driven by a convergence of socio-economic, behavioural, and systemic health factors. The Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER) rose from 5 to 19%, reflecting expanded surveillance, while the Test Positivity Rate (TPR) increased from 3 to 32%, and the Annual Parasite Incidence (API) escalated from 2 to 61 per 1000 populations, indicating high levels of transmission. In 2024, following targeted public health interventions, these indicators declined—ABER to 18%, TPR to 27%, and API to 46 per 1000—suggesting a measurable impact of the response.
The economic consequences of the malaria surge were substantial, with an estimated loss of PKR 550 million in 2023 alone due to direct medical costs, transportation, and lost income. Post-COVID changes in health-seeking behavior further complicated control efforts, as many patients bypassed formal health systems in favor of informal or unqualified practitioners. Misinformation surrounding primaquine—a key component of the radical cure for P. vivax—led to widespread treatment non-adherence and high relapse rates.
A supplementary epidemiological survey in early 2024 revealed that only 14% of previously infected individuals had completed the full course of primaquine and chloroquine. Over 86% either never initiated treatment, received sub-therapeutic doses, or discontinued prematurely. Reluctance was largely due to the treatment's duration, lack of awareness, and misinformation propagated by unregulated providers. Although G6PD testing infrastructure was not directly identified as a barrier in this study, its general absence in endemic regions remains a recognized constraint for primaquine prescription.
In response, WHO-trained personnel and local health authorities introduced targeted interventions: training healthcare workers on accurate primaquine dosing, patient counseling, and adherence monitoring; expanding diagnostic services; and enhancing community awareness. These actions coincided with a reduction in API and TPR in 2024, indicating the positive impact of coordinated, multisectoral efforts.
Throughout the study, P. vivax accounted for 95% of confirmed cases, consistent with its dominance in the region and its ability to relapse due to dormant hypnozoites. Plasmodium falciparum remained comparatively rare, peaking at 7% in 2022 and declining to 3% in 2024. These trends align with regional patterns in South Asia [1, 19].
Shangla’s north–south ecological gradient was key in shaping transmission patterns. The warmer southern lowlands support prolonged Anopheles breeding and transmission from May to November, whereas high-altitude northern areas experience seasonal interruption due to sub-15 °C winter temperatures. Nonetheless, malaria transmission persists through two main mechanisms: (1) relapses from P. vivax hypnozoites during low-transmission seasons and (2) reintroduction via returning migrant labourers from endemic regions, such as Punjab and Sindh [20, 21].
Distinct seasonal peaks were observed: P. vivax transmission peaked in July–August, coinciding with early monsoon rains and rapid development in vectors like Anopheles culicifacies, while P. falciparum peaked later in October–November and was linked to post-monsoon breeding of Anopheles stephensi and its higher thermal development threshold. These observations align with other South Asian reports [19, 22].
Diagnostic trends revealed widespread reliance on rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), which accounted for 82% of confirmed cases, while microscopy confirmed only 18%. Although RDTs have improved access in remote settings, limited microscopy use may hinder species differentiation and detection of low-parasitemia cases [23]. Furthermore, without routine confirmatory testing or external quality assurance, diagnostic reliability remains a concern.
In 2024, the reduction in malaria cases coincided with a coordinated response involving WHO-trained teams, the Indus Hospital Network, and the Global Fund. Key interventions included the establishment of 78 diagnostic and treatment centers, mass distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), targeted indoor residual spraying (IRS), and community-level awareness campaigns. These efforts, alongside strengthened primaquine adherence monitoring, likely contributed to the observed decline in transmission.
Despite progress, critical challenges persist. Continued reliance on RDTs without confirmatory microscopy, the influence of informal providers, low community health literacy, and stock limitations of IRS chemicals and PPEs pose significant threats to sustained control. Misinformation about primaquine continues to undermine adherence, while the absence of G6PD testing infrastructure may constrain safe prescription practices. These systemic barriers are consistent with findings from other endemic regions [1, 24].
This study had several limitations. It relied primarily on passive facility-based surveillance, potentially underestimating asymptomatic or unreported cases. The 2024 behavioural survey, while informative, focused only on confirmed P. vivax cases and may not capture broader community practices. Additionally, molecular diagnostics (PCR) were not uniformly applied, limiting confirmation in suspected mixed infections.
Overall, this investigation underscores the multifactorial drivers of malaria resurgence in highland South Asia, particularly in ecologically diverse and resource-limited regions like Shangla. Sustainable control will require continued investment in surveillance, diagnostic infrastructure, community engagement, and targeted treatment strategies. The Shangla experience illustrates both the vulnerabilities and opportunities inherent in malaria control and may serve as a model for context-specific P. vivax elimination efforts.
Conclusion
Shangla District in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa remains a high-burden malaria zone, with P. vivax responsible for the vast majority of (95%) of confirmed cases between 2020 and 2024, followed by P. falciparum (4.6%) and mixed infections (0.4%). The persistent transmission is driven by multiple, interconnected factors: incomplete adherence to primaquine treatment (leading to a 74.5% relapse rate), inadequate G6PD deficiency screening, climate warming, and frequent population movement, especially labor migration from endemic regions. Environmental changes, such as rising temperatures and erratic rainfall, have expanded mosquito habitats into higher altitudes, further complicating control efforts.
Although a significant decline in malaria cases was observed in 2024 following targeted interventions, including improved primaquine compliance, intensified vector control, and public health education, significant challenges remain. These include limited diagnostic capacity, insufficient coverage of long-lasting insecticidal nets, and behavioral barriers to treatment adherence.
Sustainable malaria elimination in Shangla will require integrated, locally adapted strategies that address clinical, environmental, and socioeconomic determinants. Priority actions should include expanding G6PD testing, strengthening vector surveillance, promoting radical cure adherence, scaling up community-based education, and a short-duration treatment anti-malarial drug is the key need for preventing and eradicating malaria. This multifaceted approach is essential to effectively reduce malaria transmission and address the unique vulnerabilities of mountainous regions like the Shangla region.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the District Health Office Shangla, malaria field staff Shangla, facilities in charge, WHO country technical officers, the TIH district Shangla staff, and the Department of Infectomics & Molecular Pathogenesis at Cinvestav Mexico for their support. Special thanks go to the patients who voluntarily participated in the study.
Author contributions
The authors thank the District Health Office Shangla, malaria field staff Shangla, facilities in charge, WHO country technical officers, the TIH district Shangla staff, and the Department of Infectomics & Molecular Pathogenesis at Cinvestav Mexico for their support. Special thanks go to the patients who voluntarily participated in the study.
Funding
The Global Fund partly supported this study to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and the Indus Hospital Network as part of a malaria control initiative. The District Health Department of Shangla provided additional support. The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Ihsan Ullah, Email: Gawri2019@gmail.com.
Rosa Maria Del Angel Nunez, Email: rmangel@cinvestav.mx.
References
- 1.Rehman A, Hussain M, Ahmad S, Khan I. Malaria prevalence in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2006–2021). Prev Med Rep. 2023;10: 10133748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sarma DK, Prakash A, O’Loughlin SM, Bhattacharyya DR, Mohapatra PK, Mahanta J. Seasonal prevalence of Anopheles mosquitoes and their association with meteorological factors in northeastern India. Acta Trop. 2019;191:243–51.30659804 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Directorate of Malaria Control (DMC), Pakistan. Malaria Annual Report. 2023.
- 4.Ahmed A, Khan H, Shah S. Epidemiological impact of labor migration on vector-borne diseases in northern Pakistan. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7:45–54.35324592 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khan NH, Bile KM, Qazi J. Malaria control in Pakistan: new tools at hand but challenging epidemiological realities. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;20:102–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khan MB, Hussain S, Iqbal Z. Socioeconomic determinants of malaria in rural Pakistan. Malar J. 2021;20: 112.33632220 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martens P, Hall L. Malaria on the move: human population movement and disease transmission. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:103–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Basharat R. Pakistan almost halves malaria cases in five years. Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance; 2022. https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/pakistan-almost-halves-malaria-cases-five-years. Accessed 10 July 2024.
- 9.WHO. Malaria microscopy quality assurance manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204266. Accessed 10 July 2024.
- 10.Rocklöv J, Dubrow R. Climate change: an enduring challenge for vector-borne disease prevention and control. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:479–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:498–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.WHO. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: Round 7 (2015). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204114. Accessed 10 July 2024
- 13.Gosling R, Okell L. Malaria RDTs: improving access but limiting precision. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:e142–7.32386611 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Common Management Unit (CMU) for AIDS, TB & Malaria, Pakistan; 2023. www.cmu.gov.pk. Accessed 10 July 2024.
- 15.Fatima SH, Zaidi F, Rafiq J, Bhandari D, Ali A, Bi P. Impact of temperatures on malaria incidence in vulnerable regions of Pakistan: empirical evidence and future projections. Epidemiol Infect. 2025;153: e33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abbott Diagnostics. SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.v package insert; 2022. https://www.globalpointofcare.abbott. Accessed 10 July 2024.
- 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malaria diagnosis (United States); 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/diagnosis.html. Accessed 10 July 2024
- 18.Dev V, Phookan S, Sharma VP, Anand SP. Physiological responses of Anopheles species to changing climate and their role in malaria transmission dynamics in northeastern India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2015;52:187–94. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ali S, Khan A, Malik S. Climate change and malaria expansion in Pakistan: a spatiotemporal analysis. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023;13:45–59. [Google Scholar]
- 20.White NJ, Imwong M, Dondorp AM. Plasmodium vivax relapse. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;390:131–51. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Das MK, Laman M, Moore L, Benjamin JM, Yadi G, Bona C, et al. Operational challenges and opportunities for malaria elimination. Trop Med Int Health. 2021;26:250–63. [Google Scholar]
- 22.WHO. World Malaria Report 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240079923. Accessed 10 July 2024.
- 23.Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation & Coordination (MoNHSR&C). National malaria strategic plan 2021–2035; 2021.
- 24.Ashley EA, Phyo AP, Woodrow CJ. Malaria. Lancet. 2023;391:1608–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.




