Abstract
Candidozyma auris (formerly known as Candida auris) (C auris) is a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that has emerged as a significant threat to global health. Shifts in climatic conditions may be driving its adaptation and pathogenicity. Its increased ability to tolerate higher temperatures has been suggested as the first adaptation led by anthropogenic climate change in a pathogenic organism. In this study, we analyzed 801 whole-genome sequences isolated in clinical settings from the New York-New Jersey region from 2016 to 2024. Using Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression models, we identified previously described antifungal resistance genes, their associated point mutations, heat tolerance genes, and their link with key climatic variables using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Our analysis revealed that the heat tolerance genes HSP90 and HSP104 were present in >98% of isolates. Among the antifungal resistance-related genes, several showed significant associations with climatic variables, particularly with precipitation and temperature. Elevated precipitation was consistently linked to increased prevalence in antifungal resistance genes and their associated point mutations, suggesting that elevated moisture levels may promote favorable conditions for fungal growth and biofilm formation. Additionally, the interaction between climatic variables showed a stronger association with the presence of resistance genes, evidencing the multifactorial nature of climate change in shaping pathogen adaptations. These findings emphasize the influence of climatic variables on the resistome of C auris, which is crucial for predicting the spread and resistance patterns of C auris as climate change continues.
Keywords: antifungal resistance, Candida auris, climatic drivers of resistance, multivariate climatic analysis
Candidozyma auris (formerly known as Candida auris) (C auris) is an emergent fungus that causes severe healthcare-associated infections and outbreaks [1, 2]. C auris was first described in 2009 [3]. Since its emergence, C auris has been isolated from all continents except for Antarctica, with more than 4733 reported infection cases from at least 33 countries between 2009 and 2019 [4, 5]. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classified C auris as an urgent public health threat, the first fungal pathogen to be classified as such [6]. This classification arises because of several concerning characteristics, including its high levels of antifungal resistance [7], efficient transmission within healthcare settings, ability to survive in the environment, high rates of mortality, and the challenge to detection via routine diagnostic tests [8, 9]. In healthcare settings, patients colonized with C auris are an important source of transmission as they can shed large concentrations of the pathogen to surrounding environmental surfaces and equipment [10]. The reasons behind C auris emergence and its original ecological niche outside healthcare settings remain unknown.
The low number of human fungal pathogens compared to other taxonomic groups has been proposed to result from the combination of advanced host-defense mechanisms and mammal high basal temperatures, which create a restriction zone [11]. The optimal growth temperature of Candida is 37°C, preferentially colonizing the cooler skin. However, C auris’ tolerance is higher than other phylogenetically related species [12] and can reach up to 42°C, moving it closer to internal mammalian temperatures and, therefore, facilitating infection [13, 14]. The thermal restriction zone that protects mammals from fungal infections is based on the difference between their basal and environmental temperatures, and therefore, climate change-induced global warming will reduce the magnitude of the gradient between them [14], leading to the positive selection of more thermotolerant fungal lineages [12]. It has been previously suggested that every 1°C gained in the global average temperature will reduce this gradient by about 5% [14]. The differential capacity of C auris to survive at higher temperatures than its phylogenetic counterparts has been proposed as a recent acquisition, suggesting that this species could be the first example of a pathogenic fungus emerging from human-induced global warming [12].
Previous literature has suggested that the increase in temperature and antifungal resistance in Candida are interlinked and may be related to the presence and acquisition of genes and point mutations such as HSP90 [15] or HSP104 [16]. These genes play a critical role in both heat tolerance and drug resistance in C auris, particularly resistance to azoles [17]. The high level of baseline antifungal resistance present in C auris has been suggested as 1 of the leading causes of its emergence because of the widespread use of antifungal drugs in agriculture worldwide, which could have modified and expanded the ecological niche of C auris [7, 18]. It has been described that the influence of climate change on agricultural fungicide use leads to cross-resistance between environmental and clinical antifungal treatments, exacerbating the problem of C auris resistance [19]. Furthermore, there is evidence that increased heat stress accelerates the appearance of genetic mutations in fungi, promoting the appearance of antifungal resistance by enhancing transposable DNA elements, which contribute to the development of thermotolerance and drug resistance [20]. However, these hypotheses have not yet been quantitatively demonstrated for C auris, and thus, the genomic landscape of this fungi and its relationship with environmental variables needs further investigation.
In this study, we used 801 whole-genome clinical isolates of C auris from the states of New York and New Jersey to explore the potential relationship between the presence of genes and point mutations associated with heat tolerance and antifungal resistance and the changes in variables related to climate over 8 years. This study highlights the critical need for active environmental surveillance of C auris in its natural environment and may serve as the reference for future research aiming to link the presence of antifungal and heat tolerance genes and point mutations in fungi with climatic patterns once a more extensive body of genomic data is available.
METHODS
Data Collection and Curation
Our dataset comprises 801 whole-genome C auris sequences isolated in the states of New York (87.4%) and New Jersey (12.6%) from April 2016 to February 2024 (Supplementary Table 1). The raw whole-genome sequences were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Entrez database [21] in Sequence Read Archive format [22]. The quality assessment of the raw sequences was done using FastQC v0.12.1 [23], followed by their trimming using Trimmomatic [24]. The resulting high-quality reads were then assembled into contigs using SPAdes v3.15.5 [25]. We then evaluated the assembly quality using QUAST v5.2.0 [26].
Gene Selection and Detection
We searched the literature to find the most relevant genes and point mutations conferring antifungal resistance and heat tolerance in C auris. Gene sequences were downloaded from the Candida Genome Database [27] (accession numbers available in Supplementary Table 2). To scan for the presence of the selected genes and point mutations (Table 1), we used NCBI-BLASTn, a specific version of NCBI-BLAST focused on nucleotide-nucleotide sequence alignments [28]. The search was conducted considering 100% coverage and identity. This process allowed us to prepare a comprehensive presence-absence matrix for the selected antifungal resistance and heat tolerance genes and point mutations.
Table 1.
List of All Genes and Their Point Mutations Associated With Antifungal Resistance
| Class | Gene | Point Mutation(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Azoles | CDR1 | V704L |
| ERG11 | K143R, Y132F, F126L, V125A, K177R, N335S, E343D, I466 M, F444L, F126T, K143F, Y132H, G458S | |
| MRR1 | N647T, P683S | |
| TAC1a | A640V | |
| TAC1b | A640 V, A651T, A657 V, F214L, F214S, K247E, M653 V, R495G, S611P | |
| Flucytosines | ADE17 | G45V |
| FCY2 | M128fs | |
| FUR1 | F211I, Q64* | |
| Echinocandins | FKS1 | F635C, S638Y, S639Y, S639F, S639P, D642Y |
| FKS2 | … |
The complete pipeline used in this study is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Project workflow illustrating the step-by-step processes involved in both the bioinformatic pipeline for processing genomic data and the climatic variables pipeline for processing environmental data. Abbreviations: NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; SRA, Sequence Read Archive; USGS, United States Geological Survey; VIF, variance inflation factor; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.
Climatic Analysis Pipeline
We performed a literature search to identify the most relevant climatic variables for fungal spread. Our final section included the following 11 variables: average precipitation, average temperature, average wind speed, extreme maximum temperature for the period, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, number of days with maximum temperature > 70°F (21.1°C), number of days with maximum temperature > 90°F (32.2°C), number of days with greater than or equal to 0.1 inches of precipitation, number of days with greater than or equal to 1.0 inch of precipitation, and runoff, which quantifies water discharged in surface streams.
We then gathered these climatic data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center [29] using the R package “httr” [30]. The variable runoff was downloaded using the R package “dataRetrieval” [31]. The collected information underwent processing, data manipulation, and quality control measures using the R packages “dplyr” [32] and “lubridate” [33].
To maintain a higher number of isolates per unit of time and to include the effect of climatic seasonality on the models, we divided the time periods into seasonal quarters, where Q1 = December, January, and February, Q2 = March, April, and May, Q3 = June, July, and August, and Q4 = September, October, and November.
Association Between Genes and Climatic Variables
To assess the association between gene presence and climatic variables while accounting for multiple comparisons, we employed a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model using PyMC version 5.12 [34]. In this model, each isolate's binary variable (gene presence vs. absence) was treated as a Bernoulli random variable with a logit link. The linear predictor is composed of 3 key components: first, a global intercept representing the baseline log-odds of gene presence; second, fixed effects for the 11 climatic variables, all centered and scaled to unit standard deviation so that reported offs ratios (ORs) correspond to a 1-standard deviation increase, for which we imposed independent Laplace (L1) priors to shrink small coefficients toward zero, thereby effectively performing variable selection and reducing the risk of spurious associations; and third, a random intercept for “quarter year” that captures temporal clustering and unobserved heterogeneity across different quarters, with the random intercept assumed to follow a normal distribution with mean zero and an unknown standard deviation (σ_q). We performed posterior sampling using the No-U-Turn Sampler, running 4 chains with 2000 post-warmup draws per chain (after 1000 tuning iterations) and setting the target acceptance rate to 0.95 to improve convergence. Convergence diagnostics, including Rhat values and effective sample sizes, were evaluated using ArviZ [35], and all key parameters (global intercept, climate coefficients, and σ_q) demonstrated satisfactory convergence (Rhat < 1.01). Posterior summaries comprising means, standard deviations, and 94% highest density intervals (HDI) were computed for each parameter, and forest plots were generated to visually represent the estimated effects of climatic variables using the Matplotlib Python library version 3.5.1 [36]. Prior-versus-posterior overlays for every coefficient whose 94% HDI excluded zero (Supplementary Fig. 2) and trace plots with effective-sample statistics (Supplementary Fig. 3) provide additional convergence and information-content diagnostics.
The code of the pipeline used for these analyses is available at https://github.com/manuelncsu/C_auris-climate_change/tree/main.
RESULTS
Distribution of Antifungal Resistance and Heat Tolerance Genes and Point Mutations
Across all our isolates, we identified varying levels of presence for the 29 antifungal resistance plus relevant point mutations. These results show a widespread prevalence of several key antifungal resistance genes, particularly those associated with azoles and flucytosines (most genes present in >98% of isolates). However, specific resistance mutations, such as FKS1 (S639F) and ERG11 (Y132F) were less frequent (<5%). Regarding the prevalence of heat tolerance genes, notably, HSP90 and HSP104, were found to be highly prevalent, with >98% occurrence in our dataset, and therefore were not suitable to use for further analysis (Supplementary Figure 1).
Interactions Between Climate and Resistance Genes and Point Mutations
Our analysis revealed several significant associations between the presence of specific resistance genes in Candida auris and climatic variables (Supplementary Table 3). Our results show that hydrological variables were the dominant drivers. Higher total precipitation (PRCP) raised the odds of detecting FKS1 (OR = 1.7; 1.4–2.1), its point mutant D642Y (1.9; 1.4–2.6), ADE17 (1.6; 1.3–1.9), and FUR1 (F211I) (1.7; 1.3–2.2). Surface runoff showed parallel positive effects on FKS1 (1.5; 1.2–1.8), FKS1 (S639F) (2.0; 1.5–2.7), FLO8 (2.1; 1.4–3.0), and again FUR1 (F211I) (1.6; 1.2–2.1). The frequency of light-rain days (DP01) likewise increased the odds of FLO8 (1.8; 1.3–2.4). On the other hand, temperature exerted gene-specific effects. Warmer nightly minima (TMIN) reduced ADE17 prevalence (OR = 0.55; 0.43–0.70), whereas warmer daily maxima (TMAX) elevated the odds of the CDR1 V704L variant (1.7; 1.3–2.3); a higher mean temperature (TAVG) increased FUR1 F211I (1.5; 1.2–2.0). No other climatic covariate showed a credible association after Laplace shrinkage. These findings are supported by the prior-posterior overlays in Supplementary Figure 2, which show minimal prior influence, and by the trace-mixing diagnostics in Supplementary Figure 3. These findings underscore the multifactorial role of climate in shaping the C auris resistome, highlighting the importance of considering climatic contexts in genomic epidemiology studies (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Forest plots of climatic effects on gene presence for genes with the highest associations. These genes were chosen based on their strong evidence of association with climatic factors in our Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression analysis, which incorporated a random intercept for quarter-year and Laplace (L1) priors on the climate coefficients to control for multiple comparisons. Each panel shows posterior odds ratios (OR, blue points ± 94% highest-density interval) for 1 focal gene; the vertical dashed line marks the null value OR = 1. Climate covariates were z-scaled, so ORs correspond to a 1-standard deviation increase. Parameters whose 94% HDI excludes 1 are highlighted in orange. AWND, average wind speed; DP01, number of days with precipitation ≥ 0.1 inch; DP10, number of days with precipitation ≥ 1.0 inch; DX70, number of days with maximum temperature > 70°F (21.1°C); DX90, number of days with maximum temperature > 90°F (32.2°C); Abbreviations: EMXT, extreme maximum temperature for the period; PRCP, average precipitation; TAVG, average temperature; TMAX, maximum temperature; TMIN, minimum temperature; RUNOFF, water discharged in surface streams.
DISCUSSION
Over the past decade, the emergence and spread of C auris as an antifungal-resistant pathogen and its elevated thermotolerance have become significant concerns for modern medicine [37]. This study aimed to identify climatic variables associated with the presence of antifungal resistance and heat tolerance genes and point mutations in C auris using isolates from the New York and New Jersey areas. By combining genomic data with high-resolution climatic information, this study identified associations between climate and resistance at gene level, supporting previously proposed hypotheses about C auris evolutionary adaptation and revealing novel insights into the interconnection between environment and the genetic basis of resistance in this pathogen.
Global warming has previously been proposed as the driver for C auris to efficiently overcome the mammalian thermal barrier, leading to its emergence as a human pathogen [37, 38]. Although climate change is a known driver for species adaptations [39], the acquisition of thermotolerance in C auris has been suggested to be the first caused by anthropogenic climate change in a pathogenic organism [38, 40, 41], highlighting the importance of further studies on the relationship between climate change and the pathogenicity of emerging C auris strains. Previous studies have stated the essential roles in stress responses (i.e., heat tolerance) of the HSP90 and HSP104 genes in C auris [17, 42]. This was reflected in the high prevalence of these genes among our isolates (>98% of our whole database), which were collected from symptomatically infected patients in clinical settings, supporting their key role in the adaptation of C auris to surpass the thermal barrier imposed by homeotherm organisms [12].
Heat tolerance and antifungal resistance in C auris have been described to be interlinked due to the function of genes such as HSP90, which is associated with C auris growth and tolerance to azole antifungals, which block ergosterol biosynthesis [17]. Furthermore, numerous studies have described the association between the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and climate change in fungi [20] and bacteria [43], particularly in relation to global warming, supporting our observed positive associations between the presence of antifungal resistance genes and point mutations in C auris with variations in average temperature.
Our findings reinforce that temperature extremes and moisture significantly influence the genetic makeup of C auris. Particularly, lower minimum temperatures negatively correlated with genes such as ADE17, whereas higher average temperatures increased the odds of detecting genes like FKS1 and the variant CDR1_V704L, indicating selective pressures imposed by temperature fluctuations. We also found a strong positive association between precipitation and the rise of antifungal resistance genes in C auris, which can be attributed to moisture fostering fungal proliferation, creating favorable conditions for its growth and survival [44]. Humidity associated variables (i.e., precipitation, runoff) produced the most consistent associations, where in some genes it doubled the odds of harboring resistance determinants, including ADE17, FKS1, FKS1 (D642Y), FKS1 (S639F), and FUR1 (F211I) (Figure 2, Supplementary Table 3). The CDR1 gene has a critical role in antifungal resistance and is also present in >98% of our isolates. This gene facilitates biofilm formation, which protects the fungus from environmental stressors [45, 46]. Past studies have explored how precipitation and its influence on local humidity contribute to the formation and maintenance of biofilms in natural and clinical settings [44, 47, 48], providing a protective niche where resistant strains of C auris can proliferate.
However, climate change is a multifactorial process [49], and therefore, evolutionary adaptations are generally driven by the interconnection of multiple variables. In the case of C auris emergence, it has been previously described that the optimal conditions for its survival and propagation also include the combination of humidity with temperature, evidencing an important contribution to its spread inside and outside of healthcare settings [40, 50]. The seasonality found in the presence of antifungal resistance genes and its association with variations in precipitation and temperature suggests that C auris may be adapting in response to predictable environmental changes. For that reason, understanding seasonal dynamics is crucial for the prediction of potential outbreaks and the implementation of control and prevention strategies for this fungus based on historical patterns and trends of these variables.
Although our study provides valuable insights, there were still some limitations. Primarily, even though the area combining New York and New Jersey is one of the regions with the highest number of detected cases in the United States [51], this small geographical sector represents a limitation for this type of study. Future studies should include expanding the access to genomic datasets to other regions with contrasting environmental conditions. The second limitation faced by this study is the lack of information from nonclinical environments. The analysis of mostly clinical isolates from symptomatic patients likely poses a bias toward genomes that are suspected to be thermally tolerant based on their isolation source, which would be explained by the generalized presence of genes as HSP90 and HSP104. This potential relationship has been suggested in previous work, where clinical samples present increased HSP90 expression under heat stress and during infection, supporting survival in febrile and host-imposed stress conditions [52]. Access to isolates from nonclinical sites would be an indicator of the most likely environmental reservoirs of C auris, would provide a more comprehensive picture of the genomic diversity of C auris strains in a region, and better inform of the differences in gene presence between pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains. In that context, an additional limitation to consider is that without antifungal susceptibility testing, there is no way of knowing whether the presence of the gene or the necessary mutation will lead to the expression of a resistant phenotype; thus, studies that combine genomic and phenotypic testing are needed. Finally, our analysis time frame (8 years) is constrained by the new emergence of the pathogen. Because of this short period, our results are arguably exploratory, and further analysis over a longer period will be needed to validate our findings and provide more robust estimations of the identified relationships. Additionally, the period studied was influenced by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, which particularly affected healthcare systems and increased the number of detected cases of C auris worldwide [53].
In conclusion, this study applied an integrative method that allowed us to investigate the potential climate-dependent trends in the temporal and genomic evolution of C auris. Our results support previously proposed hypotheses on the relationship between climatic variables and the appearance of antifungal resistance in C auris, particularly temperature and precipitation. The associations found between the presence of resistance genes and point mutations and the seasonality of these climatic variables emphasize the adaptation plasticity of this pathogen. This study highlights the need for increased surveillance of C auris and provides a starting point for the development of future studies in other geographical areas, including isolates from both hospital and external environments that could better capture the ecological niche and evolutionary trajectory of C auris in response to climate change.
Supplementary Material
Notes
Acknowledgments. This material is based upon work supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (U01CK000587) and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R35GM134934). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.
Patient Consent Statement. No patient-related data were used in this project. Thus, no ethical committee approval was required.
Contributor Information
Manuel Jara, Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Alba Frias-De-Diego, Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Robert A Petit, Department of Statistics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Yiqiao Wang, Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Maria Frias, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Lanzas, Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
References
- 1. Pfaller MA, Diekema D. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20:133–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. McNeil MM, Nash SL, Hajjeh RA, Phelan MA, Conn LA, Plikaytis BD, et al. Trends in mortality due to invasive mycotic diseases in the United States, 1980–1997. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:641–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol 2009; 53:41–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rhodes J, Fisher MC. Global epidemiology of emerging Candida auris. Curr Opin Microbiol 2019; 52:84–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chen J, Tian S, Han X, Chu Y, Wang Q, Zhou B, et al. Is the superbug fungus really so scary? A systematic review and meta-analysis of global epidemiology and mortality of Candida auris. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. CDC . CDC's antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA: Center of Disease Control (CDC), 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chaabane F, Graf A, Jequier L, Coste AT. Review on antifungal resistance mechanisms in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chakrabarti A, Singh S. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris: an epidemiological review. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18:551–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Emergence of Candida auris: an international call to arms. New York, NY: Oxford University Press US, 2017:141–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sexton DJ, Bentz ML, Welsh RM, Derado G, Furin W, Rose LJ, et al. Positive correlation between Candida auris skin-colonization burden and environmental contamination at a ventilator-capable skilled nursing facility in Chicago. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:1142–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Casadevall A. Fungi and the rise of mammals. 2012. e1002808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12. Casadevall A, Kontoyiannis DP, Robert V. On the emergence of Candida auris: climate change, azoles, swamps, and birds. mBio 2019; 10:e01397–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rossato L, Colombo AL. Candida auris: what have we learned about its mechanisms of pathogenicity? Front Microbiol 2018; 9:3081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Garcia-Solache MA, Casadevall A. Global warming will bring new fungal diseases for mammals. MBio 2010; 1:e00061–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ilie MI, Mahler B, Ciolan G, Stoichiță A, Popescu O, Preda M, et al. Candida auris: the unwelcome superfungus. Farmacia 2023; 71:225–35. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Allert S, Schulz D, Kämmer P, Großmann P, Wolf T, Schäuble S, et al. From environmental adaptation to host survival: attributes that mediate pathogenicity of Candida auris. Virulence 2022; 13:191–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kim SH, Iyer KR, Pardeshi L, Muñoz JF, Robbins N, Cuomo CA, et al. Genetic analysis of Candida auris implicates Hsp90 in morphogenesis and azole tolerance and Cdr1 in azole resistance. mBio 2019; 10:e02529–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Jackson BR, Chow N, Forsberg K, Litvintseva AP, Lockhart SR, Welsh R, et al. On the origins of a species: what might explain the rise of Candida auris? Journal of Fungi 2019; 5:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Misseri G, Ippolito M, Cortegiani A. Global warming “heating up” the ICU through Candida auris infections: the climate changes theory. Critical Care 2019; 23:1–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Williams SL, Toda M, Chiller T, Brunkard JM, Litvintseva AP. Effects of climate change on fungal infections. PLoS Pathog 2024; 20:e1012219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Maglott D, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Tatusova T. Entrez gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(suppl_1):D52–D7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Katz K, Shutov O, Lapoint R, Kimelman M, Brister JR, O'Sullivan C. The sequence read archive: a decade more of explosive growth. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50(D1):D387–D90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Andrews S. Fastqc: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Babraham Bioinformatics, Babraham Institute, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. Spades: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ondov BD, Starrett GJ, Sappington A, Kostic A, Koren S, Buck CB, et al. Mash screen: high-throughput sequence containment estimation for genome discovery. Genome Biol 2019; 20:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Skrzypek MS, Binkley J, Binkley G, Miyasato SR, Simison M, Sherlock G. The Candida Genome Database (CGD): incorporation of assembly 22, systematic identifiers and visualization of high throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 45:gkw924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36(suppl_2):W5–W9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. NOAH . National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center; Monthly climate data for the United States; 2024.
- 30. Wickham H. httr: Tools for Working with URLs and HTTP. R package version 05. 2014. Available at: http://CRANR-project org/package=httr.
- 31. DeCicco L, Hirsch R, Watkins D, Johnson M. dataRetrieval: R packages for discovering and retrieving water data available at: US federal hydrologic web services. Version 2.7. 15. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA; 2024. Available at: https://code usgs gov/water/dataRetrieval.
- 32. Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D. dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1. 2. Computer software. 2023.
- 33. Grolemund G, Wickham H. Dates and times made easy with lubridate. J Stat Softw 2011; 40:1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Salvatier J, Wiecki TV, Fonnesbeck C. Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Comput Sci 2016; 2:e55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kumar R, Carroll C, Hartikainen A, Martin O. Arviz a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in Python. J Open Source Softw 2019; 4:1143. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 2007; 9:90–5. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Stephenson JC, Garza DR, Bouklas T. A fungus for our time: Candida auris emerges into the anthropocene. Curr Trop Med Rep 2023; 10:244–51. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Garcia-Bustos V, Cabañero-Navalon MD, Ruiz-Gaitán A, Salavert M, Tormo-Mas MÁ, Pemán J. Climate change, animals, and Candida auris: insights into the ecological niche of a new species from a One Health approach. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:858–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Osborne M. Ten species that are evolving due to the changing climate. Smithsonian Magazine. 2023. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/this-fungus-is-quickly-spreading-and-climate-change-may-be-to-blame-180982631/ [Google Scholar]
- 40. Casadevall A, Kontoyiannis DP, Robert V. Environmental Candida auris and the global warming emergence hypothesis. MBio 2021; 12:e00360–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ellwanger JH, Chies JAB. Candida auris emergence as a consequence of climate change: impacts on Americas and the need to contain greenhouse gas emissions. The Lancet Regional Health–Americas 2022; 11:100250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Xiao W, Zhang J, Huang J, Xin C, Li MJ, Song Z. Response and regulatory mechanisms of heat resistance in pathogenic fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2022; 106:5415–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Meinen A, Tomczyk S, Wiegand FN, Sin MA, Eckmanns T, Haller S. Antimicrobial resistance in Germany and Europe–a systematic review on the increasing threat accelerated by climate change. J Health Monit 2023; 8(Suppl 3):93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Silva I, Miranda IM, Costa-de-Oliveira S. Potential environmental reservoirs of Candida auris: a systematic review. Journal of Fungi 2024; 10:336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kean R, Delaney C, Sherry L, Borman A, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, et al. Transcriptome assembly and profiling of Candida auris reveals novel insights into biofilm-mediated resistance. Msphere 2018; 3:e00334–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. de Jong AW, Hagen F. Attack, defend and persist: how the fungal pathogen Candida auris was able to emerge globally in healthcare environments. Mycopathologia 2019; 184:353–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Arora P, Singh P, Wang Y, Yadav A, Pawar K, Singh A, et al. Environmental isolation of Candida auris from the coastal wetlands of Andaman Islands, India. MBio 2021; 12:e03181–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Escandón P. Novel environmental niches for Candida auris: isolation from a coastal habitat in Colombia. Journal of Fungi 2022; 8:748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Srivastav A, Srivastav N, Nishida. The science and impact of climate change. London, UK: Springer, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Chowdhary A, Jain K, Chauhan N. Candida auris genetics and emergence. Annu Rev Microbiol 2023; 77:583–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Lyman M, Forsberg K, Sexton DJ, Chow NA, Lockhart SR, Jackson BR, et al. Worsening spread of Candida auris in the United States, 2019 to 2021. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:489–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Khalili V, Shokri H, Akim AM, Khosravi AR. Differential gene expression of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) of Candida albicans obtained from Malaysian and Iranian patients. Malays J Med Sci 2016; 23:64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Najeeb H, Siddiqui SA, Anas Z, Ali SH, Usmani SUR, Jawed F, et al. The menace of Candida auris epidemic amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Diseases 2022; 10:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


